|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20212J9991999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Clinton,H Clinton, Chairman Jackson &/Or Wd Travers Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Plant to Ensure That Public Health & Safety Adequately Protected ML20212L1831999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Wd Travers Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Millstone to Ensure Adequate Protection to Public Health ML20212L2081999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance ML20212L2171999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners,Wd Travers & Ferc,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island ML20212L1971999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Chairman Jackson & Commissioners Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance to Ensure Public Health & Safety ML20212K1241999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to Chairman Jackson,Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performace of Millstone to Ensure That Public Health & Safety,Adequately Protected ML20112E8911996-05-24024 May 1996 FOIA Request to Inspect & Copy Original OL Issued by Aec/Nrc for Util & EPP Issued as App B to Plant OL SNRC-2192, Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank1995-05-15015 May 1995 Forwards Both Copies,Signed by Util President Cv Giacomazzo, of Amend 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-87.Util Returning Copies Because Effective Date Left Blank ML20082B9131995-03-13013 March 1995 Submits Corrected Page for Insertion Into Final Rept Re Confirmatory Survey of RB & Phase 4 Systems at Plant ML20081A9321995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-81, Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6531995-03-0707 March 1995 Forwards Final Rept Orise 95/B-80, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A6841995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081B5801995-02-21021 February 1995 Forwards Final Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7001995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg,Suppression Pool,Phase 2 & Phase 3 Sys, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny ML20081A7111995-01-30030 January 1995 Forwards Rev 1 to Draft Rept Confirmatory Survey of Reactor Bldg & Phase 4 Sys,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2189, Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 19941995-01-20020 January 1995 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept, Jan-June 1994 SNRC-2188, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey1995-01-20020 January 1995 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Certain Elevated Levels Found During Phase 4 Confirmatory Survey SNRC-2187, Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring1995-01-11011 January 1995 Forwards Snps Annual Man-Rem Rept, Including Individuals for Whom Personnel Monitoring Provided During CY94,per 10CFR20.407(a) & (B).Rept Also Includes Individuals Identified in 10CFR20.202(a),who Require Monioring SNRC-2182, Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning1994-11-0101 November 1994 Forwards Final Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Cy 1994, Including Last Revised Copies of ODCM & Pcp.Rept Prepared for Closeout Purposes as Part of Completion of Plant Decommissioning ML20077L3331994-10-25025 October 1994 Forwards Revised Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny ML20076K3881994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Reactor Bldg, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny,For Review & Comment ML20077M8351994-10-20020 October 1994 Forwards Draft Rept, Confirmatory Survey of Radwaste Bldg, Suppression Pool & Phase 2 Systems,Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2184, Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld1994-10-12012 October 1994 Forwards Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 4. Portions Withheld SNRC-2185, Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-10-0404 October 1994 Summarizes Results from Revised Exposure Pathway Analysis Using Corrected Dcf for External Exposure for Cs-137.Rev 1 to Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl ML20076F9251994-09-26026 September 1994 Forwards Final Rept Orise 94/I-80, Confirmatory Survey of Turbine Bldg,Site Grounds & Site Exteriors Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Brookhaven,Ny SNRC-2183, Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-871994-09-23023 September 1994 Forwards Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-87 SNRC-2181, Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 11994-09-14014 September 1994 Notifies of Equipment Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Rept on Phase I Final Survey Status,Provided in Util .Equipment Changes Described in Encl Table 1 SNRC-2180, Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-021994-09-0101 September 1994 Forwards 940829 Memo Entitled, Technical Evaluation of Dusting from Concrete Blocks, Addressing Issue Discussed in Insp Rept 50-332/94-02 SNRC-2179, Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl1994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposes That Release Criterion for Soil Be Applied to Certain Other Bulk Matls Which Will Remain at Plant Upon Completion of Decommissioning.Analysis of Bulk Matl Reconcentration Potential & Possible Exposure Pathways Encl SNRC-2178, Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4))1994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Proprietary Response to NRC Concerns Re Survey Instruments Used for Termination Survey.Extensive Discussion Provided in Interest of Rapidly Bringing Outstanding Concerns to Close.Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(4)) ML20072P1591994-08-17017 August 1994 Forwards Revised, Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Bldg & Suppression Pool for Plant SNRC-2176, Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-821994-08-0404 August 1994 Informs of near-term Completion of Decommissioning of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station & Hereby Respectfully Requests Support in Achieving Timely Termination of Facility possession-only License NPF-82 SNRC-2177, Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld1994-08-0404 August 1994 Forwards Rev 3 to Shoreham Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan. Portions of Rept Withheld ML20071L8741994-07-29029 July 1994 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Radwaste Building & Suppression Pool for Review & Comment SNRC-2175, Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively1994-07-18018 July 1994 Provides Notification of Survey Location Changes to Shoreham Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Repts on Phases 1,2 & 3 Final Survey Status Provided in Refs 1,2 & 3 Respectively SNRC-2173, Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)1994-06-14014 June 1994 Forwards Termination Survey Final Rept Phase 3. Proprietary Pages to Rept Also Encl.Proprietary Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) SNRC-2172, Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-821994-06-0707 June 1994 Certifies That All SNM as Irradiated Fuel Permanently Removed from Site & That Decommissioning/Decontamination Work on Biological Shield Wall Complete,In Accordance W/Nrc Approving Amend 11 to Pol NPF-82 SNRC-2171, Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel1994-06-0202 June 1994 Submits Resolution of Items Identified by NRC Region I Project Inspector,Pertaining to Planned Final Draindown & Discharge of Spent Fuel Storage Pool,Following Complete Removal of Irradiated Fuel SNRC-2170, Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan1994-05-20020 May 1994 Requests Approval of Proposed Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan for Addl Remedial Decontamination of Shoreham Spent Fuel Storage Pool Beyond That Originally Specified in Decommissioning Plan SNRC-2168, Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc1994-05-13013 May 1994 Notification to NRC of Transfer of Device Containing 30 Uci Cs-137 Source.Device Transferred to JW Merkel,Terra Analytics,Inc SNRC-2169, Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project1994-05-11011 May 1994 Advises of Listed Clarification to Util Re Resignation of Jc Brons from Position of Executive Vice President of Shoreham Decommissioning Project ML20029E1731994-05-11011 May 1994 Informs That Based on Recent Discussions Between Officials, Licensee Decided to Retain Organizational Position at Least Until Fuel Removed from Site ML20029D1991994-04-29029 April 1994 Forwards Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1993. ML20029D2571994-04-28028 April 1994 Advises That Jc Brons Resigned to Pursue Employment W/ Another Util Co,Effective 940429 ML20029C7111994-04-22022 April 1994 Submits Technical Info on Biological Shield Wall Blocks to Be Surveyed SNRC-2163, Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util1994-04-21021 April 1994 Provides Notification of Equipment Changes to Facility Which Have Occurred Subsequent to Report on Phase I Final Survey Status Provided in Util ML20065M3701994-04-20020 April 1994 Responds to NRC Verbal Request for Info Re Estimated Cost for Decommissioning SNRC-2161, Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards 1994 Internal Cash Flow Projection for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station SNRC-2160, Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b)1994-03-30030 March 1994 Forwards Financial Info Required by 10CFR50.71(b) SNRC-2148, Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases1994-03-0808 March 1994 Forwards Info Supporting Licensee Proposed Amend,Submitted on 941104.Specifically,info Supports Estimates & Conclusions Re Small Quantity of Remaining Radioactive Matl & Low Radiological Significance of Potential Accident Releases 1999-10-01
[Table view] Category:NRC TO OTHER U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY/DEPARTMENT
MONTHYEARML20247L2131989-09-15015 September 1989 Responds to Re Future of Plant.At Present,Nrc Does Not Need to Issue Order Halting Activities at Facility But Will Continue Onsite Insp to Ensure Activities Comply W/Ol Requirements & NRC Requlations ML20244C4761989-02-0101 February 1989 Advises That FEMA Testimony in Upcoming Hearing on 1988 Emergency Planning Exercise Should Discuss Listed Matters in Detail IA-89-118, Requests Advisement as to Whether Util Responses Adequately Address Areas Requiring Corrective Action as Identified During Exercise & Outstanding Plan Inadequacies.Licensee Responses to 880607 post-exercise Assessment Encl.W/O Encl1988-12-0505 December 1988 Requests Advisement as to Whether Util Responses Adequately Address Areas Requiring Corrective Action as Identified During Exercise & Outstanding Plan Inadequacies.Licensee Responses to 880607 post-exercise Assessment Encl.W/O Encl ML20245E0851988-12-0505 December 1988 Requests Advisement as to Whether Util Responses Adequately Address Areas Requiring Corrective Action as Identified During Exercise & Outstanding Plan Inadequacies.Licensee Responses to 880607 post-exercise Assessment Encl.W/O Encl ML20245E0501988-11-0707 November 1988 Forwards Util Transmitting Support Documentation Re Ingestion Pathway Brochure for Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan ML20205E7151988-10-0707 October 1988 Advises That Recipient to Zech Re Plant Prohibited Ex Parte Communication Under 10CFR2.780.Ltr Placed in PDR & Served on Parties to Plant Proceeding ML20155B4911988-06-0303 June 1988 Reaffirms Commission Position as Stated in from V Stello to G Peterson That Commission Has No Basis to Recommend That Planned FEMA Evaluated Exercise for Util Offsite Emergency Plan Should Not Proceed as Scheduled ML20154R7041988-06-0101 June 1988 Advises That Commission Has No Basis to Recommend That Exercise Should Not Proceed as Scheduled,Per 880531 Memo.Nrc Has Requested Licensee to Advise Promptly If Plans to Operate Plant Change.Served on 880606 ML20154P0801988-05-26026 May 1988 Documents 880525 Telcon Re Objectives for Plant Exercise. Licensing Board Memo Supports NRC & FEMA Judgement That Plant Exercise Test & Much of Emergency Plans Reasonably Achievable ML20154K7911988-05-23023 May 1988 Discusses FEMA Support for NRC Licensing of Facility Re Rev 10, Snps Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan. Confirms That FEMA Will Evaluate Exercise Scheduled for 880607-09 & Findings on Rev 10 to Be Provided by 880729 ML20154J5861988-05-20020 May 1988 Responds to 880513 Request for Guidance Concerning Proposed Objectives for Upcoming Facility Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Proposed Objectives Sufficient to Demonstrate Capabilities of Util Local Emergency Response Organization ML20151E1771988-05-11011 May 1988 Advises That Commission Recognized That American Red Cross (ARC) Charter from Congress & Natl Policy Require That ARC Provide Aid in Any Radiological or Natural Disaster,W/Or W/O Ltrs of Agreement W/Arc Re Particular Emergency Plan ML20153G7431988-04-29029 April 1988 Advises That Second Graded Plant Exercise Will Be Conducted on 880607-09.State & Local Officials Refuse to Participate in Emergency Response Planning.Nrc Requests Space to Operate Federal Control Cell to Simulate State & Local Officials ML20151N2251988-04-26026 April 1988 Discusses Draft Control Plan & Request Review of Plan.If Agreement Reached,Plan Will Then Be Modified to Cover Seabrook Situation.Draft Control Plan Encl ML20196C8241988-02-0808 February 1988 Requests Review of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Prompt Notification Design Rept, in Conjunction W/Fema Review of Offsite Plan.Util Ltr Transmitting Rept Encl.Rept Provided to Recipient Separately ML20196D3801988-02-0808 February 1988 Forwards Lilco Requesting That full-participation Exercise at Util Offsite Plan Be Scheduled for Earliest Possible Date.Fema Should Conduct Review of Offsite Plan Per Nrc/Fema Memorandum of Understanding ML20210C1581987-04-30030 April 1987 Discusses Util Request for Authorization to Operate Facility at 25% Power.Evaluation of Util Bases for Authorization, Including Immediate Need for Power & Reduction of Dependence on Foreign Oil,Requested by 870522 ML20206J9381987-04-10010 April 1987 Responds to 870227 Request for NRC Views on Whether Authorization of Util Dredging Project Beneficial for Natl Security & Views on Broader Issue Re Benefits of Project to Natl Interest.Natl Policy Findings Listed ML20133M9161985-08-0707 August 1985 Requests Federal Emergency Response Ctr Locations Proposed by FEMA Region II for Nuclear Power Stations on Encl List. Initial Contact Message That Will Be Used to Notify Region Upon Activation of Incident Response Ctr Encl ML20127C3711984-12-19019 December 1984 Requests FEMA Take Lead in Evaluation of Scope & Objectives of Emergency Exercise Proposed for Wk of 850211.Evaluation Involves Outstanding Plan Inadequacies & Legal Authority Issues.Util & Addl Correspondence Encl ML20128R0601984-12-12012 December 1984 Forwards Util Re Emergency Preparedness Plan & Local Emergency Response Organization Exercise Proposed for Wk of 850211.FEMA Review & Determination of Appropriate Level of Excercise Planning Requested ML20128Q8401984-10-0909 October 1984 Responds to Enclosing Correspondence Re Facility Licensing.Util Has Developed Own Offsite Emergency Response Organization W/Personnel Not Ordinarily Performing Such Duties in Event of Emergency.Aslb Decision Expected by 1985 ML20235B9341970-09-30030 September 1970 Forwards ACRS 700923 Repts on Listed Plants.W/O Repts for Indian Point Unit 2 & Midland Units 1 & 2 ML20235C7451968-07-16016 July 1968 Forwards 680618 Amend 1 to Util Application for License,Per 610801 Understandings ML20235C6901968-07-0202 July 1968 Forwards Notice of Receipt of Application for CP & Facility License & Vols I,Ii,Iii & IV of Psar,Per 610801 Understanding ML20235C6971968-07-0202 July 1968 Forwards Vols I,Ii,Iii & IV of PSAR as Part of Util Application for Licenses to Const & Operate Facility,Per Understandings in Udall ML20235D1471968-07-0202 July 1968 Requests Review of Util Application for Licenses to Const & Operate Nuclear Power Reactor Re Meteorological Aspects of Proposed Reactor Location.W/O Stated Encls ML20235D1891968-07-0202 July 1968 Forwards Vols I,Ii,Iii & IV of Facility Psar,Per Understandings Reflected in Udall to Seaborg. Results of Review Re Radiological Effects on Fish & Shellfish Requested ML20235D3111968-07-0202 July 1968 Requests Comments on Info Presented in Vols I,Ii,Iii & IV of Facility PSAR for Proposed Nuclear Power Station,Per Arrangements for Assistance in Evaluating Water Surge & Wave Runup Aspects 1989-09-15
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20212J9991999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Clinton,H Clinton, Chairman Jackson &/Or Wd Travers Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Plant to Ensure That Public Health & Safety Adequately Protected ML20212K1241999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to Chairman Jackson,Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concern Re Millstone Npps.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performace of Millstone to Ensure That Public Health & Safety,Adequately Protected ML20212L1971999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Chairman Jackson & Commissioners Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance to Ensure Public Health & Safety ML20212L2171999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners,Wd Travers & Ferc,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island ML20212L1831999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltr to Wd Travers Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Emergency Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Performance of Millstone to Ensure Adequate Protection to Public Health ML20212L2081999-10-0101 October 1999 Responds to Recent Ltrs to President Wj Clinton,Chairman Jackson & Commissioners & Wd Travers,Expressing Concerns Re Millstone NPPs & Continued Lack of Mgt Plan for Eastern Long Island.Nrc Continues to Monitor Plant Performance ML20059J8101994-01-26026 January 1994 Responds to 930701 & 16 Ltrs Re Changes to Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Revised Security Plan for Long Term Defueled Condition,Fuel Storage in Spent Fuel Identified as Rev 2. Changes Acceptable ML20058P2831993-12-0808 December 1993 Advises That Rev 2 to Security Plan for Long Term Defueled Condition,Fuel Storage in Spent Fuel Pool Consistent W/ Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable for Inclusion Into Plan W/Encl Exceptions.Exceptions Withheld Per 10CFR73.21 ML20058D1971993-11-22022 November 1993 Forwards Insp Rept 50-322/93-03 on 930801-1008.No Violations Noted.Weaknesses Were Identified in Initial Fuel Shipment at Shoreham Station ML20058K7301993-11-16016 November 1993 Informs That Case 93-4269,State of Nj Vs Long Island Power Authority Filed on 930921,seeking to Prevent Barge Shipments of Slightly Spent Fuel from Defunct Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant to Limerick Plant Dismissed on 931021 ML20062J7981993-11-0505 November 1993 Forwards EA & Finding of No Significant Impact in Response to 930706 Request for Exemption from Revised Requirements of 10CFR20 for Unit 1.Schedular Exemption Granted ML20059B2231993-10-22022 October 1993 Ack Receipt of 931008 Petition Filed W/Edo,Requesting That Commission Take Immediate Action to Halt Ongoing Shipments of Fuel ML20057F2071993-09-30030 September 1993 Forwards Exemption from Emergency Preparedness Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),per 930126 Request & SER ML20057B7201993-09-14014 September 1993 Forwards EA & Finding of No Significant Impact in Response to 930126 Request for Exemption from Emergency Preparedness Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q).Informs That After EA & Fonsi Published in Fr,Exemption Can Be Granted ML20057D8981993-09-13013 September 1993 Forwards Enclosure (8) to SECY-93-166 Re Proposed Characteristics of Design Basis Vehicle.W/O Encl ML20056H5131993-08-26026 August 1993 Accepts Changes to Safeguards Contingency Plan Identified as Rev 6.Changes Consistent w/10CFR50.54(p) ML20056H1991993-08-26026 August 1993 Responds to Re Changes to Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Guard Training & Qualification Plan Identified as Rev 6.Rev Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable for Inclusion Into Plan IR 05000322/19930021993-08-16016 August 1993 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-322/93-02 ML20056C7151993-07-14014 July 1993 Forwards Amend 10 to License NPF-82 & Se.Amend Revises Defueled TS by Deleting Requirement That Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Be Submitted on Semiannual Basis & Eliminates Requirements for Ac Sources ML20056G0041993-06-25025 June 1993 Submits Info Re Implementation of Training Rule 10CFR50.120 for Licensees of Plant in Decommissioning Process ML20058M0361993-04-12012 April 1993 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards Records in App L Which Are Being Withheld Partially for Listed Reasons,(Ref FOIA Exemptions 5) ML20128G6271993-02-0202 February 1993 Forwards Insp Rept 50-322/92-05 on 921013-1231.No Violations Noted.One Unresolved Item Described.Decommissioning Activities Generally Well Managed ML20128H2951993-01-29029 January 1993 Informs That NRC Has Reviewed & Approved Licensees Ltr LSNRC-2019 Dtd 921230,requesting Change to Shoreham Decommissioning Plan in Accordance W/Condition 4 for Decommissioning Order ML20126G9351992-12-22022 December 1992 Submits Results of Review of 921204 & 14 Requests for Approval of Changes to Decommissioning Plan Covering Decommissioning of Existing Liquid Radwaste Redundant Sys. Removal of Redundant Sys Approved ML20126F9431992-12-16016 December 1992 Provides Interim Response to Re Transnuclear Inc Application for License to Export Irradiated Fuel from Facility in New York to Cogema in France ML20126G9231992-12-16016 December 1992 Forwards Comments Per Review of Rev 0 to Decommissioning Project Termination Survey Plan,Submitted Via . Addl Info Needed to Complete Review of Proposal to Exclude Fe-55 from Consideration W/Surface Contamination Limits ML20128E1061992-12-0202 December 1992 Forwards Insp Rept 50-322/92-04 on 920627-1012 & Notice of Violation ML20133N0981991-08-27027 August 1991 Forwards Viewgraphs Used by Long Island Lighting Power Assoc During Meeting W/Nrc on 910816 ML20058J0591990-11-19019 November 1990 Forwards NRC Public Notice of 901108 License Amend Request Re Shipment of Fuel Support Pieces to Low Level Radwaste Disposal Repository at Barnwell,Sc ML20058H8091990-11-14014 November 1990 Responds to Indicating Desire to Ship 137 Fuel Support Castings & 12 Peripheral Pieces to Low Level Radwaste Repository ML20062F4301990-11-0808 November 1990 Advises That Ofc of General Counsel Designated to Review & Resolve Six Petitions Filed by Scientists & Engineers for Secure Energy & Stated School District Re Amends to Ol. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 901109 ML20062C1901990-10-24024 October 1990 Advises That Commissioner Jr Curtiss Will Visit Plant on 901113 to Tour Facility & Meet W/Lilco Mgt & Operating Personnel to Review General Status of Activities at Plant. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 901024 ML20058G4471990-10-18018 October 1990 Forwards Sept 1990 Rept to Commission on Implementation of TMI Action Plan Items,Per 900320 Commitment.W/O Encl.Review Concluded for All But Two Units ML20062B6631990-10-12012 October 1990 Extends Invitation to Attend 910220-21 Util Symposium/ Workshop in King of Prussia,Pa Re Engineering Role in Plant Support ML20059M7901990-09-27027 September 1990 Advises That 880708 Response to NRC Bulletin 88-004 Re Potential safety-related Pump Loss Acceptable ML20059M4991990-09-20020 September 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-322/90-02 on 900606-0825.No Violations Noted ML20056B4481990-08-21021 August 1990 Forwards Exemption from fitness-for-duty Requirements Re 10CFR26,per .Exemption Requested to Limit Scope of Program to Persons W/Unescorted Access to Area Containing Equipment Necessary to Support & Maintain Storage of Fuel ML20059A6491990-08-16016 August 1990 Grants Waiver of Compliance from Limiting Condition for Operation 3.7.1.2.b.3 of Tech Spec on Plant Svc Water Sys, Per 900810 & 15 Ltrs.Waiver Allows Performance of Underwater Radiation Survey & Physical Insp of Selected Fuel Elements ML20059A6351990-08-15015 August 1990 Forwards Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amend to License NPF-82 & Proposed NSHC Determination & Opportunity for Hearing Re 900105 Application ML20059A7151990-08-14014 August 1990 Expresses Appreciation for Remarks on Status & Schedules During drop-in Visit at Region I on 900731.Summary of Discussion Encl ML20058N8391990-08-13013 August 1990 Forwards Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 900315 Request for Exemption from Full Scope of Fitness for Duty Requirements of 10CFR26 ML20058P1921990-08-0707 August 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-322/90-03 on 900710-13.No Violations Noted.One Unresolved Item Noted ML20058M5951990-08-0606 August 1990 Discusses Licensee Engineering Initiatives.Encourages Initiation of Initiative Similar to Region V Licensees Establishment of Engineering Mgrs Forum to Foster Disciplined & Coordinated Approach to Initiatives ML20056A1971990-07-31031 July 1990 Forwards Amend 6 to License NPF-82,safety Evaluation,Notice of Issuance & Exemption Re Defueled Emergency Preparedness License Condition.Proposed Changes Would Allow Util to Cease Offsite Emergency Preparedness Activities ML20055G5691990-07-19019 July 1990 Grants Util 15-day Extension of 900619 Waiver of Compliance Re OL Paragraph 2.C.(13) Quarterly Drills License Condition. Extension Will Allow NRC to Complete Review of Associated Request to Cease Offsite Emergency Preparedness Activities ML20055D2911990-06-27027 June 1990 Forwards Review of Util 900105 Request to Amend Tech Specs to Reflect Plant Protracted Defueled Condition.Meeting Should Be Scheduled at Site on 900719 & 20 to Discuss Finalizing Plant Defueled Tech Specs ML20055E3591990-06-25025 June 1990 Forwards Amend 5 to License NPF-82 & Safety Evaluation.Amend Changes Administrative Section of Tech Specs & Moves Procedural Details Involving Radioactive Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation & Equipment Requirements to ODCM ML20055C8281990-06-19019 June 1990 Grants 900530 Request for Waiver of Compliance from License NPF-82,Paragraph 2.C.(13) Re Quarterly Drills License Condition,Pending NRC Action on 891215 Request to Cease Offsite Emergency Preparedness Activities ML20248C0531989-09-26026 September 1989 Forwards Amend 4 to Indemnity Agreement B-87,reflecting Changes to 10CFR140.Amend Reflect Increase in Primary Layer of Nuclear Energy Liability Insurance Provided by ANI & Maelu ML20248G9331989-09-25025 September 1989 Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 50-322/89-08 on 890821-24.No Violations Noted 1999-10-01
[Table view] |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
14
[
.8 UNITED STATES -
o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(' WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\ . . . . . *[ September 15, 1989 h CHAIRMAN The Honorable James D. Watkins Secretary of Energy Washington, D. C. 20585
Dear Mr. Secretary:
I am responding to your letter of July 27, 1989, concerning the future of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. The Comission is closely monitoring the 4
activities being carried out at the Shoreham facility to ensure compliance with Commission regulations. In that connection,.the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). staff, in public meetings with the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) on June 30 and July 28; 1989, underscored LILC0's obligations to ccnform to all requirements of the license issued by the Commission and all requirements of Comission regulations until such time as the Commission approves changes in l the license. By letter dated August 30, 1989 (copy enclosed), the staff !
formally notified LILC0 of the requirements that a majority of the Comission believes should be met at Shoreham until disposition of the facility is authorized by the NRC.
As is the case with all facility licenses issued by NRC, the plant Technical l Specifications, which are conditions of the license issued to LILCO, provide '
a degree of flexibility with respect to such matters as staffing depending on the operational status of the facility. At present, the fuel has been '
removed from the reactor and placed in the spent fuel pool. This is an i activity routinely carried out at other licensed facilities and is authorized ;
under the existing operating license. With the fuel in the fuel pool, the license requirements for staffing are reduced from those required for operation .
in a critical or power operation mode. However, an adequate number of properly !
trained staff are required to ensure plant safety in the defueled state. You i expressed the concern that the loss of trained staff may result in some delay ,
before the facility could start power operation. However, provided there is {
sufficient staff to satisfy the requirements of the existing operating license ;
to ensure that the plant is safe in its defueled condition, we do not believe !
that reduction in staff at the facility warrants enforcement or sanction. l l
Further, there are limitations on the changes that LILC0 can make without NRC approval concerning emergency planning and the licensee's Local Emergency Response Organization (LER0). Shoreham's operating license imposes conditions i relating to the LERO, and a license a.aendment is required in order to change ,
these conoitions. In addition,10 CFR 50.54(q) authorizes the licensee to make ,
changes in the emergency plan without NRC approval only if such changes do not ;
decrease the effectiveness of the emergency plan. Although LILCO has indicated I that it would like to amend the current license to permit reductions in the LERO in light of the low radiological risk, such amendments would require prior NRC approval. ;
QVO m ), l vpqpotsy R H Rh
4 Admiral Watkins .. .
The NRC staff made clear at the June 30 and July 28 meetings and in the August 30 letter that it is unacceptable to the NRC for LILCO to permit the Shoreham facility to deteriorate. The licensee will be required to maintain all systems needed for safety in the defueled mode in a fully operable con-dition. All other systems required for full-power operation of the facility are to be preserved from degradation, with such maintenance or custodial services as may be necessary to ensure such preservation.
Moreover, NRC regulations require LILCO to obtain C9mmission approval before decommissioning the facility. In evaluating any proposal for decommissioning the Shoreham facility, the Comission will carefully assess all appropriate issues in determining whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with the Comission's regulations in 10 CFR Part 51. Until approval to decommission is granted, the staff has requested a comitment from LILC0 to maintain the Shoreham facility as described above. If LILCO requests transfer of the facility to another person for decommissioning, approval by the Comission is required before such transfer may take place. As in all our actions, NRC will not permit any improper segmentation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process. Finally, as you correctly noted in your letter, the Comission's rules require that we offer an oppor-tunity for public hearing on any proposed license transfer and before NRC approval of decommissioning may be granted.
At this time, we do not perceive a regulatory need to issue an order halting activities currently going on at the Shoreham facility. Although LILC0 has indicated its intent not to operate Shoreham and the Agreement between LILCO and the State of New York indicates an intent to decommission the facility, thus far the activities that LILCO is carrying out are authorized under the existing license. The Comission will continue on-site inspections to ensure that such activities comply with the requirements of the operating license and our regulations. If necessary, NRC will issue appropriate orders or sanctions to ensure compliance with Commission regulations in the event of improper activities such as safety violations, violations of license conditione, or the start of decommissioning without Commission approval.
I want to assure you that the dismantling or degradation of the Shoreham facility will not be permitted until the Comission has authorized decomis-sioning. Further, the Comission will not authorize decommissioning until the safety and environmental reviews of such a proposal are carried out and the necessary opportunity for public hearing, in accordance with the Comission's regulations, has been provided.
Sincerely, eW.
Kenneth M. Carr '
Enclosure:
As stated
{
l 1
I
_ _ _ _ _ .___________-__________-_______________D
--o LA 4 UNITED STATES -
,, 1[
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .
wAsHWGTON, D. C. 20555 k.....[i_I -
' AUG 3 01989 4
Mr. Anthony F. Early, Jr.
President-
. Long Island Lighting Company LExecutive Offices-175' East Old Country Road
.Hicksville, New York 11801 =,
Dear Mr. Early:
At our meeting on July 28, 1989 LILCO outlined in general terms its plans, over the. coming months,' to reduce expenditures while continuing to assure facility -
' safety and continued compliance with 'the requirements of its Operating License
'NPF-82 and the Commission's regulations. At the meeting..the staff indicated' to you that while the approach outlined does not give the staff near-term concerns, it is not clear that in the longer term the posture outlined by
'LILC0 would be satisfactory. The staff also pointed out that it was unaccept-
. able to the staff to permit the plant to deteriorate. LILC0 responded with its assurance'that it did not intend to permit the plant to deteriorate and >
emphasized that you-were budgeting some $45-55 million for the next year for!
t .the:Shoreham facility.
Now that the reactor has been defueled, we believe it would be valuable to again meet to discuss the specifics of your program for assuring facility
. preservation.- I have asked Mr. Brown, the NRC Shoreham Project Manager, to set up such a meeting with your staff before September 15, 1989.
'In this connection, LILCO is requested to provide the NRC with its written commitment to assure,. for an extended period, (until decommissioning or other disposition of the facility is authorized by NRC) that:
5)- All systems required for safety in the defueled mode are main-tained in fully operable status.
- 2) All systems required for full-power operation of the facility
'are to be preserved from degradation, with such maintenance and custodial services and appropriate documentation as may be necessary to ensure such preservation.
- 3) There shall be an adequate number of properly trained staff to ensure plant safety in the defueled state, including the ability to cope with malfunctions, accidents, and unforeseen events.
At such a meeting LILCO should be prepared to reiterate, but in greater detail, LILCO's specific plans to assure these criteria are satisfied. Such plans ff'0 b O f S
}F M B 8 0 1989
'Mr. Anthony F. Early, Jr. should be provided to the NRC in writing before the meeting, or if this is insufficient time, shortly thereafter.
We also wish to discuss your plans to maintain the approved Emergency Plan and the LERO organization in conformance with the requirements of the license and 10 CFR 50.54(q) until such time as modifications may be authorized by NRC.
Lastly, at the meeting on June 30, 1989, your staff promised to provide Mr. Russell with a written description of the process followed by LILCO in selecting the operating status to be maintained for the various plant systems in the defueled conditions and the process followed in determining the intended staffing changes. This comitment was recognized and reiterated by Mr. Daverio at the meeting on July 28,1989. That information has not yet been
.provided._It_.is important that this information be promptly provided so that the NRC staff has an opportunity to review it before the September meeting.
Sincerely.
0 >
[d.+xs.4> b * "/
Taomas E. Murley, Director 0 ffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation se
h 1 M '
The S'ecretary of Energy .
4 i Washington, DC 20585 l f A
~
p July 27, 1989 Admiral Kenneth M. Carr Chairman, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Admiral Carr:
I undar:;tand that, pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, an application or applications will be filed shortly with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) by the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) and the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) seeking the required consent of the NRC for (1) LILCO's surrender of its full power operating license in favor of a possession-only license for its Shoreham facility; (2) transfer of the possession-only license to LIPA; and (3) the decommissioning of Shoreham by LIP.A utilizing the technical services of the New York Power Authority (NYPA) to perform the decommissioning activities. These NRC authorizations will be sought solely to effectuate an agreement among LILCO, LIPA and New York State pursuant to which the Shoreham facility is to be sold for a token consideration in order to dismantle it before it ever generates electricity commercially.
The dismantling of this invaluable energy resource, the safety of which has been affirmed by the NRC through years of technical review and extensive litigation, would be a colossal mistake. Shoreham's destruction would be contrary to every principle associated with the establishment and maintenance of a sensible national energy policy and would be inconsistent with the provision of an adequate and reliable supply of energy in the Northeast. Further, dismantling of this facility will necessitate the increased use of fossil fuels and the concomitant adverse environmental impacts associated with their use--the very impacts which the Bush Administration is striving to mitigate and, where possible, avoid.
The Atomic Energy Act provides that any person whose interests may be affected by the issuance of a proposed operating license amendment may request a public adjudicatory hearing to contest the proposed amendment.
Important questions exist regarding the technical, managerial and financial qualifications of LIPA to hold an NRC license for the purpose sought, and these matters raise considerations of the type which, under the Commission's regulations (10 CFR 50.92), require that a requested adjudicatory hearing be conducted before the Commission approves the proposed amendments.
[$0$h ,
p -
[ -
o -
2 The Commission also has discretion pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act and its regulations to hold a prior hearing if it determines that such a hearing should be held in the public interest. There could hardly be a stronger case than this one for the exercise of such discretion.
Significant issues of first impression are obviously raised by the proposal to transfer a new, baseload electric generating facility, possessing a full power operating license, to an entity with no expertise in and no experience with nuclear facilities for the express purpose of tearing it down. In addition, once the license transfer and dismantling are authorized and commenced, the consequences would be irreversible and the availability of any remedy following a hearing on the significL41 public issues involved would be entirely foreclosed.
In this regard, I am extremely concerned that the plans recently announced by LILCO for defueling the reactor and for drastic reductions in plant staffing will have the effect of disabling the facility before LILCO and LIPA ever approach the NRC with the aforementioned license amendment requests. There have been disturbing reports in the public media that, following dispersal of the Shoreham operations staff as currently planned, it may take as long as two to three years to reassemble the operating staff required to safely operate Shoreham.
LILC0 should not be allowed to disable the facility indirectly prior to formal approval by the NRC of the decommissioning of the plant through the license amendment process. I would urge the Commissior, to monitor closely any actions, such as defueling, destaffing or reduced maintenance, which are intended to commence the dismantling. In this regard, the Department would support the issuance by the NRC of an immediately effective order prohibiting LILC0 from taking actions which, in effect, initiate the decommissioning process for Shoreham before NRC permission is sought and granted for that action following a full adjudicatory hearing.
I also strongly urge the Commission and the NRC staff not to consider the various steps leading to the dismantlement of Shoreham (license surrender, license transfer, and decommissioning) as independent requests for discrete actions which can be segmented for purposes of the NRC's required safety and environmental review. These actions must be viewed as integral parts of the basic and overriding plan to dismantle Shoreham that was actually memorialized in a written agreement. The possession-only license and LIPA's qualifications to hold an NRC license can be assessed properly only in the context of the activities to be authorized under the license. These license amendment requests should only be considered in light of both a full analysis of the decommissioning plan required by the NRC's regulations and a full evaluation of the consequences of destroying Shoreham required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
In this case, the written agreements among the parties clearly establish that the impending request by LILCO for a possession-only license is !
intended to formally initiate the process of dismantling Shoreham.
Certainly the Commission should treat this license amendment no differently than do the parties to this ill-censidered plan. Under
_ _ _ ___ - _______- _ -_ - - -- ~)
3 l these circumstances, approval by the NRC of action leading to the dismantling of a newly completed, licensed nuclear facility in the face of increasing energy reliability problems on Long Island is clearly a
" major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment." Accordingly, NEPA requires that a detailed comprehensive environmental impact statement must be prepared and circulated for public comment prior to the approval of any of the impending license amendment requests. Aside from the significant environmental impacts associated with. alternative energy sources, with the exacerbation of the energy reliability problems on Long Island and with the decommissioning itself, there are alternatives to the impending proposal which are obviously superior.to dismantling the facility.
The Shoreham plant is a significant domestic energy source that is capable of meeting the electricity requirements of Long Island and the surrounding region in a safe, reliable and economical manner for years to come. The dismantling of Shoreham would be a grave mistake even if the energy situation on Long. Island were more favorable. Taking this action under present circumstances would be simply irresponsible. Thus, it is obvious that the proposal for the NRC to authorize the destruction of the plant raises, and requires the NRC to address, issues involving power needs, alternatives and other important environmental considerations in an EIS. Following completion of that document, these matters should be fully evaluated in the public hearing afforded those whose interests may be affected before the NRC determines whether to permit Shoreham to be destroyed. The interests of this Department, the Northeast and the Nation will be affected in a far-reaching manner by the Commission's ultimate decision in this matter.
Sincerely, James D. Watkins Admiral, U.S. Navy (Retired) cc: Commissioner Thomas M. Roberts Commissioner Kenneth C. Rogers Commissioner James R. Curtiss
. _ _ - - _ - - - - _ _ - - _ - - _ - _ - - _ _