ML20151N225
| ML20151N225 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook, 05000000, Shoreham |
| Issue date: | 04/26/1988 |
| From: | Weiss B NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD) |
| To: | Donovan D Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151N202 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-280 NUDOCS 8808080146 | |
| Download: ML20151N225 (31) | |
Text
E. T 4
, g * # t <..
- mp::
i i fi NUCLE AR REGUL ATOR Y CO'4 MISSION g Dy[ !.
c.
.. : m a e ;m s
A 1
April 26, 1988 NOTE T0:
Dick Donovan, FEMA RX FROM:
Bernie Weiss, NRC/AEOD
SUBJECT:
DRAFT SHOREHAM CONTROL PLAN As we agreed in our telephone conversation of April 22, I have combined, cur draf t Seabrook control plan, the 1986 Shoreham control plan, my draf t of a new Shoreham control plan and our discussions and have developed the draf t tnat is enclosed.
As you can see, I have changed the format somewhat but have kept the essential information and expanded the guidance a bit for the Control Cell.
I have dropped two items that were in the 1986 control plan and now seem out of place in this version, i.e., Control Cell Information and Guidance for Players / Observers.
Almost all of the Control Cell information was included in the body of the plan.
In addition, anything pertinent with regard to guidance for the simulators should be in the body of the plan and not in an appendix.
Therefore, the few thing that were not covered in the body of the plan were moved up.
Guidance for Players / Observers did not seem to fit in here, so I lef t it out.
It may be useful for them to have this information.
If so, this should be part of the controller training at the site.
)
I would like you to review this ca efully. ~ If we can come to an agreement on this control plan, I i11 then modify it to cover the Seabrect situation.
I think it would be best if they are as similar as possible since we expect to get the NRC controllers to participate in both exercises.
.n addition, I have it on my word processing system and it then becomes easy to make the changes and let you worry about one less thing for Seabrook.
For obvious reasons, I have not provided you with the bulk of Appendices E, F, G, H, and I.
You do not need to bt burdened with more paper. While you are reviewing this draft, I am also previding a copy to Ihor and other NRC offices for their review.
I also plan to provide each controller with pertinent sections of the New York State plan, and/or the Suffolk County Emergency Operating Procedures for other emergencies, and/or other New York County plans, and/or the State of Conrecticut plans.
We have made requests for experienced NRC HQs and regional staff to participate in both the Seabrook and Shoreham exercisas.
I believe that the NRC managers will be cooperative.
I expect to have the names in the next week to ten days.
I will then begin to start sending out material for their review.
You should start thinking what would be useful for them to review right after they finish the Shoreham exercise.
Let me heaf-r m you, as soon as feasible.
2 e
f Bernie Weiss, NRC/AE00 880B000146 0G0707 PDR FOI A PDR BELAIRe8-2OO
CRAFT WORKING PAPER - 00 NOT QUOTE, COPY, OR CITE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATICN GRADED EXERCISE JUNE 7-9, 1988 0FFSITE FEDERAL CONTROL PLAN FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGMENT AGENCY - REGION II l
DRAFT - 4/26/88 DRAFT WORKING PAPER - 00 NOT QUOTE, COPY, OR CITE I
5-OREHAM EXERCISE OFFSITE FEDERAL CONTROL PLAN CONTENTS SECTION 1.
INTRODUCTION.
SECTICN 2.
CONTROL ORGANIZAT:0N INFORMATION......
SECTION 3.
FACILITY & FIELD CONTROLLER INSTRUCTIONS...........
SECTION 4.
CONTROL CELL OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS..................
SECTION 5.
CO NTRO L L E R T R A I N I NG..................................
APPENDICES APPENDIX A CONT RO LLE R A S SIGNMENTS...............................
APPENDIX B SUGGESTED CONTROLLER QUESTIONS.......................
APPENDIX C FACILITY AND FIELD CONTROLLER L0G....................
APPENDIX D CONT RO L C E L L I N FO RMAT ION F0 RM........................
APPENDIX E FINAL EXERCISE OBJ ECTIVES............................
APPENDIX F SHOREHAM EXERCISE SCENARIO EXERPTS...................
APPENDIX G SUMARY O F L E RO P LAN..........................
APPENDIX H FEMA EX-3 AMENDMENT, MARCH 7, 1988...................
APPENDIX I NU R EG- 06 54, R E V.1, S U P. 1..........................
l I
1 i
l SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION This FEMA Region 11 document establishes the policy, procedures, and management structure for the use of Federal controllers during the full participation emergency preparedness exercise scheduled for June 7-9, 1988 at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
In addition, reference material for use by the con-trollers has been provided in Appendices E, F, G, H, and I.
The State of New York, Suf folk County, and Nassau County governments have declined to participate in emergency planning and exercises for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
In response to this situation, the utility has prepared its own of fsite emergency plan which utilizes utility resources in place of some of those normally provided by State and local governments and the assumed "best efforts" response of these governments in an actual event.
The utility offsite plan is titled the Local Off'.ite Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
The State of Connecticut has also declined to participate in this exercise.
.g.
SECTION 2. CONTROL ORGANIZATION In this exercise, as in o ner REP exercises, the NRC Region I spection team will evaluate the onsite efforts of LILCO.
The FEMA Region 11 esaluation team will evaluate the offsite efforts of the LILCO Loval Emergency 3esponse Organ-ization (LER0) and support agencies.
The offsite portion of the exercise is being conducted to test :ne capability of the LERO plan, e.g., of fsite activities asss tiated with the 'Tiplementation of the LERO plan (activation of LERO facilities, support equipmt. personnel, etc.).
Because of the non participation of offsite authorities, contrc'lers will need to be utilized to assist in conducting the normal FEMA evaluati:1 of the objec-tives of the exercise.
Certain offsite exercise control functicns will be exe-cuted through FEMA directed controllers who will: 1) assure that the exercise is progressing as designed to accomplish the necessary evaluaticn; 2) inject messages to assist in the evaluation of the exercise; and 3) sinulate non-participating government positions which LERO is prepared to interface with in an actual event. The purpose of the simulation is to provide a opportunity for the FEMA Region II evaluation teams to determine if the LERC plan, pro-j cedures, facilities, and preparedness can: 1) accomodate and su: cort the needs of State and local personnel; and, 2) provide appropriate coordination and i
supply adequate information to State and local officials so that they can carry out their responsibilities in a "best efforts" response to an actual event.
At the request of FEMA, NRC has agreed to support FEMA by provicing the bulk of this control support so that FEMA's limited resources can be used for the exercise evaluation portion of the exercise.
These Federal control functions will be performed primarily at :.ne LERO E0C, control cell, and with the raaiation monitoring teams dispatche: by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL).
A list of the controller positions and assignments i
is provided in Appendix A.
I The overall responsibility for the conduct of the FEMA offsite evaluation of the Shorehas exercise is 19e responsibility of the FEMA RII RAC :hairman, Ihor i
Husar, who will also supervise and monitor the actions of the cc1 trollers as the Exercise Evaluation Coordinator.
Reporting to him will be Eernard Weiss who will directly monitor and supervise the control cell operati:ns. Figure 1 j
provides a graphical depiction of the control organization for t.9e exercise i
evaluation.
As in other exercises, LERO has designated a Master Controller a.1d a control organization. The FEM 4 Exercise Evaluation Coordinator nas coordinated these efforts with LER0's efforts in order to minimize the potential for conflict.
They will be collocated during the exercise in order to provide a point of control / interface in the event an issue / conflict needs to be resalved, or if certain limiting coditions need to be placed upon exercise play.
At all times, the LER0 Master Controller and control organization will :e in charge of the exercise scenario (timeline/ initiating events and extent :f exercise play / demonstration).
.g.
l i
l FIGURE 1 l
FEMA REGION II CCNTROLLER ORGANIZATION 1
l FEMA EXERCISE EVALUATION COORDINATOR l
IHOR HUSAR LOCATION: LERO EOC 1
LERO E0C FIELD TEAM MONITORING CONTROL CELL Chief Controller, Bernard H. Weiss Controller:
Controllers:
Controllers:
l
SECTION 3. FACILITY AND FIELO CONTROLLER INSTRUCTIONS CONTROLLER ASSIGNMENTS Facility and field controllers are responsible for inputting exercise messages and exercise data to specific designated exercise participants.
Facility and iield controller assignments are as follows:
LERO E0C Controller:
1 This individual will be located at the LERO E0C.
At specific times during the exercise play, the FEMA Exercise Evaluation Coordinator will provide exercise messages for input.
The controller will present the message to i
the appropriate player, log the time on their personal controller log (Appendix C), and inform the FEMA Exercise Evaluation Coordinator (by message number) of the event.
Field Monitoring Team Controller:
Field monitoring team controllers will evaluate Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) field monitoring teams and provide simulated radiological monitoring data to the field monitoring team players as conditions re-quire. For this exercise, the Field Monitoring Team Controllers will also f unction as FEMA evaluators for the BNL activities.
CGNTROLLER INSTRUCTIONS 1.
The LER0 EOC controller and the field monitoring team controllers shall be prepositioned at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the exercise.
2.
Prior to the exercise commencement, communications for the LER0 E0C controller and tne field monitoring tearr controllers shall be tested to ensure satisfactory exercise control.
3.
All controllers will comply with instructions from the LERO controllers and the FEMA Exercise Evaluation Coordinator.
l 4.
The LERO EOC Controller shall have copies of the FEMA exercise messages.
An evaluator will provide messages at appropriate times to the LERO E0C Controller for input.
Messages shall be delivered by the controller at the appropriate times, to the designated individual (s).
If the response of exercise participants necessitates the use of a contingency message, the situation, if possible, should be discussed with the FEMA Exercise Evaluation Coordinator prior to issuance of the message.
A controller will use the following techniques to input messages and data into the exercise play in accordance with the scenario:
a.
Control Messages - Control messages provide information to partici-pants and/or cause participants to take action needed to keep the exercise moving smoothly.
The controller will give a hard copy of the control treessage to the designated participant at a specified time.
Simultaneously, the controller will provide essential informa-tion verbally.
The controller will follow through and clarify the message by answering questions to ensure that the participants do not read extraneous meaning into the message.
Controllers will NOT tell participants what action they are expected to take.
b.
Contingency Messages - Contingency messages will be used only if participants f ail to take the major actions expected from the control messages by the time designated.
A controller will give :ne contingency message to the designated participant and explain in as much detail, as necessary, what actions the participant is expected I
to perform.
Contingency messages are used to keep the exercise o-schedule, though their use may indicate inadequate plan i
implementation.
c.
Control Information - Controllers for health physics and field monitoring teams will provide instrument readings and other infor-mation to players verbally.
In the field, controllers will refer to their current location on the maps and the applicable time period to obtain requested data.
5.
All Controllers shall synchronize their watches to ensure that messages are delivered at the proper time.
Times on messages are given 00:00 (08:00) indicates time zero (start) and 8:00 A.M.
6.
Each Field Team Controller will have copies of radiological parameters (data) corresponding to the development of the exercise scenario.
This information should be issued, when required, to the appropriate exercise participants.
7.
Controllers shall ne provide information to the exercise participants regarding scenario development or resolution of problem areas encountered.
The exercise participants are expected to obtain information through their own organizations or control cell and exercise their own judgments in determining response actions and resolving problems, t
8.
Any inquiries originating from the general public, as a result of exercise activities, will be referred to either the LERO Master Controller or FEMA Exercise Evaluation Coordinator.
An explanation will consist only of stating that a practice drill is underway at the plant and all events are simulated (i.e., not real).
9.
Some exercise participants may insist that certain parts of the scenario are unrealistic. The LERO Master Controller has the sole authority to clarify any questions regarding scenario content.
10.
Each Controller, with the exception of the two (2) Field Team Controllers, is expected to log the time (s) that he/she inputs FEMA Region 11 control messages (Appendix C - Facility and Field Controller Log).
If other controller / player discussions / interactions occur, these times with appro-priate comment (s) should be logged as well (see Appendix).
11.
In the event of a real emergency during the exercise, the exercise may be be iremediately terminated by the LERO Master Controller, if deemed appropriate.
5-
SECTION 4. CONTROL CELL OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS ROLE OF CONTROL CELL The role of the control cell is to provide a mechanistr for LERO players to demonstrate their interf ace with government agencies w o would be contacted in an actual emergency but have refused to play in this esercise.
Controllers will not communicate with players f ace-to-f ace, i.e., as stand-ins.
Communi-cations between players and non participating government controllers will be accomplished by telephone, facsimilie, electronic mail. etc.
OESCRIPTION OF CONTROL CELL One control cell representing non participating governnent organizations will
)
be established to comunicate with of ficials at the LEIO E0C.
The Control Cell will also have a location, adjacent to but separate fran the main Control Cell,
)
to accomodate LERO liaisons, described in the LERO pla,.
The positions or I
organizations that the control cell will be prepared t: represent are the following:
SUFFOLK COUNTY.
i County Executive Comissioner of the Department of Fire, Resc;e and Emergency Services Comissioner of the Department of Health Services i
Commissioner of Police
{
Public Information personnel 1
NASSAU COUNTY:
County Executive Nassau County Police Nassau County Medical Center NEW YORK STATE:
i Governor State Department of Health Department of Agriculture and Markets State Police Office of Disaster Preparedness Office of Fire Prevention and Control Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Transportation Sta+.e Emergency Management Of fice Radiological Emergency Preparedness Group (REPG)
STATE OF CONNECTICUT:
l Department of Public Health Department of Emergency Services Department of Environmental Protection AMERICAN RED CROSS SCHOOL DISTilCTS '
l l
l.
The Control Cell will be locatec in Room
, Building at the Br okhaven National Laboratory.
The LERO liaisons will be instructed to also rep: t to j
that location by LILC0 controlle s at the appropriate time.
)
1 CON' ROLLER GUIDANCE:
)
In carrying out their roles in representing positions in non participating government organizations, the controllers must adhere stringently to tre following rules Do NOT make decisions for tre players or prompt the players to make particular decisions; Do NOT assume any command and control authority from LER0; Do NOT interact with members of the public so as to lead someone to balieve that you are actually a State or County official; and Do NOT cause LERO players to carry out or perform functions exclusively reserved to State and County officials by State and 1
County laws.
The plan which establishes the LERO organization is written in such a sanner so as to allow State and local officials to assume certain functions during an emergency or allow the LERO organization to implement these functions.
You I
should not, nowever, allow LERO players to relinquish their position and transfer any decisionmaking or command and control authority to you.
The following assumptions should be made by all controllers who will be representing State or local positions:
1 State roles to be simulated will, as much as possible, be cor.sistent with State of New York and State of Connecticut plans for otter nuclear power plants and the manner in which State personnel have participated in other exercises.
i Local government roles to be simulated wili, as much as possile, be consistent with the manner in which other counties have participated in other facility exercises with the State of New York.
Upon speaking with your LERO counterpart by telephone, you should indicate that you are a representative of State or local government.
You should furtner
)
explain that your purpose is not to make any decisions or direct any aspect of the LERO Plan but, rather to be provided with adequate information to under-stand the situation to be able to comment on any actions LERO might want to take or any actions LERO is requesting fron, the State or local official you represent.
As soon as you make contact with your appropriate LERO counterpart, you should ask for an initial brieifing which will bring you up-to-date.
You should also request periodic briefings.
During these briefings, ask any questions you feel is necessary to understand the situation.
You should act in a professional and deliberate manner.
Do NOT be belligerent. -
Controllers nave the responsibility to receive or intiate calls with LERO players; t e intent will be to understand what the player is communicating or requesting from the government position you represent.
Controllers should ask, sufficient questions to fully satisfy this understanding.
If additional infor-mation or cata is required for a full comprehension, the controller should make such a regt.est and expect that the player will provide the necessary inform-ation or data.
Suggested controller que,tions are provided in Appendix B.
When controllers are requested to provide legal authority to carry out certain functions, centrollers should assure that they fully understand the request so
)
that an incividual in that position would have acauired sufficient information from the LERO player to make an appropriate decision.
When the controller provides tre appropriate legal authority, it should be done on a case-by-case basis. General legal authority should not be provided to LERO players.
In addition, controllers should not provide more legal authority to a player than requested.
In your discussions with LERO players, they may request support from the State and local official you represent.
Under the "best efforts" concept, it would be assumed that in a real event this support would be provided and the utility would not have to carry out this function.
However, for the purposes of this exercise and for evaluating the LERO plan, as written, if support requested is for a function that the LERO organization is to demonstrate according to the j
exercise objectives (Appendix E), e.g., traffic control, verification of traffic impediments, access control, etc., you should only provide LERO with i
authority to conduct that activity.
You should not indicate that the State and local authorities will assume responsibility for that function.
In addi-tion, you should make note of each of these requests to State and local author-itites on the Control Cell Information Form," Appendix D.
If you are provided information which is not consistent with information you have obtaired from other sources, you should make the discrepancy known to the appropriate LERO player in order to determine how LERO procedures can handle such discrepancies. You should be extremely careful that these discussions of i
discrepancies do not affect the direction fo the exercise or significantly slow down the exercise. You should note these discussions on the Control Cell Information Form, Appendix 0.
In speaking with LERO players, you should not request LER0 to change the protective action recommendations, protective action decisions, or implemen-tation actions, e.g., asking them to actually sound the sirens if they do not intend to do that; asking them to actually direct traffic, suggesting that they exceed posted speed limits; or having bus drivers pick up members of the public.
You should assure that in carrying out this function, you only talk with LERO employees, LILCD controllers, and FEMA controllers and evaluators.
You should not speak with meebers of the public and media or in any way make it possible for some meeber of the public to think you are a State or local official impersonating one.
Controllers must complete a "Control Cell Information Form", Appe* dix D, for each call received or initiated which involves an exercise player The form should be completed in as each detail as possible in order to prc. ice the FEMA evaluators with detailed information on this aspect of the exercise.
Control-1ers should be aware that a FEMA evaluator will be observing the :ther end of the calls, so the summary and perspective of the controller's end of the conversation will be useful to the FEMA evaluator in developing a complete understanding of the interface.
These forms will be collected by the Chief Controller at the control cell immediately af ter each day's exercise play and provided to the FEMA RAC Chairman.
Any time you are not sure of how to respond to a LER0 player or a e concerned that your response could adversely impact the scenario, you shoulc excuse yourself (e.g., "I will be right back to answer that question. I r. ave just been informed that the [ Governor, County Executive, my boss] needs some information immediately.") and confer with the Chief Control Cell Controller, Bernard Weiss.
If at all possible, it is best to delay a response for a few minutes rather than run the risk of having a deleterious effect on the exercise.
LER0 LIAISONS The LERO plan designates at least four liaisons who have the responsibility to report to a State or County emergency response facility. These positions are:
Emergency Preparedness Advisor to the Suffolk County Execuitve Emergency Preparedness Advisor to Nassau County Executive LILCO Representative to New York State EOC LERO Traffic Control Point Coordinator to Suffolk County Police HQs When LERO liaisons are instructed to report to a State or County location, they will be instructed by a LERO controller to report to the Control Cell at the Brookhaven National Laboratory. At that location, the LERO liaison will be provided with a working area, adjacent to but separate from the Cc9 trol Cell, and a telephone capable of making 3 party conference calls.
The ifaison will communicate by telephone with the controller who represents the pcsition with whom the liaison was to interface.
As necessary, the LERO liaisor is to obtain information requested and carry out his/her responsibilities from that loca-tion.
It may be appropriate for the LERO liaison to establish 3-party calls with the controller and a LERO official to have discussions.
This would represent the situation where the LERO liaison and the State or County official were face-to-face comunicating by telephone with a LERO official at the LERO EOC.
These activities will be observed by a FEMA evaluator at the LERO E00.
The controller speaking with the LERO liaison must complete at least one "Control Cell Information Form," Appendix D, for each call. I
SECTICN 5. CONTROLLER TRAINING:
TRAINING OBJECTIVES Training will be provided to each controller to assure that each controller understands the:
1)
LERO Plan; 2)
Unique aspects of this exercise; 3)
Federal control functions in this exercise and their relationship with the FEMA evaluation responsibilities; 4)
FEMA Control Plan and organization; 5)
Instructions for carrying out specific
,s Ignments; 6)
Exercise ground rules; and 7)
Travel and exercise schedule arrangements.
TRAINING SCHEDULE The milestones and schedule for accomplisning these objectives are the following:
1)
Appropriate portions of the LERO Plan will be provided to each individual selected to be a controller at the Shoreham exercise as soon as these individual controllers are selected; 2) lhe FEMA Control Plan will be provided to each controller by May 25 for a thorough review prior to the June 1 briefing described in 3) below; i
3)
On June 1 at 10:30 a.m., a briefing will be held in the NRC Opera-tions Center (Executive Team Room) for all controllers (regional staff will participate via teleconference) to:
a)
Describe the material previously provided (LERO Plan l
excerpts, FEMA Control plan, reference material, logistics arrangements, etc.);
b)
Describe the manner of providing control support to FEMA; c)
Describe travel and schedule arrangements; d)
Answer questions about the exercise approach, control functions, logistics arrangements, etc.
4)
On the day preceding the exercise, June 6, there will be a full day of training in the Shoreham area to assure that the controllers understand their specific assignments and are familiar with the locations and facilities at which they will function..-
1 APPENDIX A CONTROLLER ASSIGNMENTS Name Assignment Location Bernard H. Weiss Chief Control Cell Controller Control Cell LER0 E0C Controller LER0 E0C Field Monitoring Team Controller BNL Field Monitroing Team Controller BNL Control Call Controller Control Cell Control Cell Controller Control Cell li il il il ll il il 18 11 18 la il la 11 60 Il Il 10 il 11
APPENDIX B SUGGESTED QUESTI0h5 FOR CCNTROLLERS REQUESTS FOR LEGAL AUTHORITY:
What specific authority are you seeking?
Why are you asking for that authority?
What is the basis for your request?
Who did the analysis? What are the uncertainties in the analysis?
What if (the wind changes, the containment doesn't hold, you loose another pump, I don't give you authority, etc. )?
Have you coordinated with (Nassau County, the State, Suf folk County)?
What did they say?
What resources do you want from this office?
INITIAL NOTIFICATION AND UPDATES:
Has this information been confirmed?
By whom?
I don't understand.
Please repeat the information and do not use so many technical terms and acronyms.
When was a (Alert, Site Area Emergency, General Emergency) declared?
Have you provided this information to anyone else? Has this information been made public? Will it be made public?
i Who did the analysis? How confident are you in this analysis? What are the uncertainties in this analysis?
What is the biggest problem being encountered?
What is the prognosis? When do you expect to make some recommendations?
When do you expect the evacuation to be completed?
i What is the situation with the special facility groups?
Have the schools been notified?
- B CONTROLLER INITIATED CALL:
(Under certain corditions, controllers may initiate cal's to the LERO EOC, e.g., player has suggested a callback procedure, control cell receives infor-mation that needs to be checked out quickly, an incorrect response was made, etc.)
You asked me to call back at this time.
What new information do you have to provide?
We just received information that is in conflict with information you previously gave me.
Please explain or look into this and call me back.
I spoke to you previously and told you...........
That was somewhat in error. On reflection, I should have told you...............
i l
1 l
. B i
APPENDIX C FACILITY AND FIELD CONTROLLER LOG ASSIGNMENT:
Message No.
Input Point Time
APPENDIX 0 CONTROL CELL INFORMATION :0RM OATE:
_/
/19 TIME:
CALL INITIATED CALL CCMPLETED:
LOCATION: CONTROL CELL OTHER INCOMING CALL SELF-INITIATED CALL PLAYER:
NAME EMERGENCY RESPONSE POSITION CONTROLLER:
NAME SIMULATED POSTION PURPOSE OF CALL:
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PLAYER:
ACTION OR RESOURCES REQUESTED BY PLAYER:
INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUESTED BY CONTROLLER:
ADEQUACY OF PLAYER"5 RESPONSE AND DISCUSSION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
CONTROLLER'S INITIALS
--me
-y-
--y--s e,
.vg
- m--
-g e
APPENDIX 0 (Cont.)
CONTROL CELL INFORMATION FORM - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION DATE:
_ / _ / 19 _
TIME:
CONTROLLER NAME:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
CONTROLLER'S INITIALS i
APPENDIX E FINAL EXERCISE OBJECTIVES
i i
O
{
APPENDIX F SHOREHAM EXERCISE SCENARIO EXERPTS l
i i
i I
1 l
l APPENC:' G l
EXERPTS FCM i
1 LOCAL OFFSITE RADIOLOGICAL E.WERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN i
J l
J
t APPENDIX H FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM (GM) EX-3 AMENDMEST MARCH 7, 1988 i
d APENDIX I NUREG-0654, REV 1, SUP, 1
(
l d
o
.,m__.,.._y.,,.7,.,
-,,..,,,,y..~,.,-,r_-w__,
,__,m.,,m,_,_,
,,m-.,~
QcesI(uten 4./g(O LONG 1SLAND LIGHTlNG COM PANY w m i tr M E sECvTivE CrFICES 17 5 C Al* 0.0 COUNTay acao. mcm SylLLE ht* YORa 1180 9 April 15,1988 BY CERTIFIEC s.A!L Mr. Frank Mancuso Director Office of Civil Preparedness Departmant of Public Safety State of Connecticut 360 Broad Street Hartford, CT 06105
Dear Mr. Mancuso:
In my January 26, 1988 letter to you, I welcomed the participa-tion of your of fice in emergency preparedness drills and exercises for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
invite your office to participate in the nextThe purpose of this letter is to cise, which will take place sometime during June,f ederally-graded exer-1988.
The exercise vill last demonstrate protective action decisionmaking and implementation fertwo both the 10-mile plume exposure pathway EPZ and the 50-mile ingest;on exposure pathway EPZ.
Of course, ef f ective emergency preparedness for the 50-mile ingestion pathway around Shoreham necessarily involves re-scurces and facilities in the State of Connecticut.
During the June exercise, as in the event of a real emergency at Shoreham, the Director of Local Response of the Local Emergency Re-sponse Organization (LERO) vill notif y your of fice and vill request assistance in implementing protective actions (if necessary)
Connecticut population.
for the We vould hope that tively in the exercise by receiving LERO's phone calls and imple-you vill pa dures for radiological emergencies.menting or simulating the State of Please call LILCO's Manager of Nuclear Preparedness, Doug Crocker, at (516) 436-4238 participation in the June exercise.by April 27 to confirm and arrange your operation.
We very much appreciate your co-Very truly yours,
/j-d 1(
A Ira L. Freilicher Vice President Lav and Corporate Affairs
PN 2 1933 p
STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY j
OFFICE OF CIVIL PREPAREDNESS April 27,1958 Mr. Ira L. Freilicher Vice President, Law & Corporate Aff airs Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801
Dear Mr. Freilicher:
Your letter of April 15, 1988 requested that this office participate in your proposed June exercise.
This office would participate in an intert ate exercise ca.ly in full coordination with the participating states and local governments.
We have not obtained such coordination, i
Therefore, this office will not conduct any evaluation exercise activities or any simulation activities during the proposed exercise conducted by LILCO.
l Sincerely, dM Frank Haneaso Director FM:js cc: Dir., N.Y. Einerg. Mgmt.
Dir., FEMA - One Comissioner,' Conn. DEP OCP Opns (N.Y. file) cf Phone:
566=3180 i
360 Broad Street - Hartford, Connecticut 06W An Equal Opportunity Employer
.gn UNITED STATES
[ ',.-
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/
/. f W ASHINGioN. o C. 20$st
\\ '~-
[:.!
REALISM CONTAINEO IN THE SHOREHAM PLAN The Shoreham plan contains several instances where the LILC0/LERO plan will utilize the resources and capabilities of the State and County governments in response to a reactor accident. In some instances, the LERO plan depends entirely on that response t) carry out a particular function and in other instan es, LERO is prepared to carry out the function alone but can accommodate State and local resources when and if they arrive.
Below is a list of the State and County resources that the LERO plan assumes will be available using the "best efforts" assumptions.
FULL DEPENDENCE ON STATE AND LOCAL l1ESOURCE:
LER0 assumes that Suffolk County will clear the roads of snow, if necessary, and has not provided for that capability.
LERO will depend on the State of New York to distribute information pamphlets to the public regarding the radiological impacts during the recovery phase.
LERO will print the oocuments 'ut will let the u
States of New York and Connecticut make any required distribution.
LERO CAPABILITY WITH RECOGNITION OF STATE AND COUNTY REPLACEMENT OR ENHANCEMENT:
LERO will dispatch Traffic Guides to control traffic.
In an emergency Suffolk County would either dispatch police officers to 1
team with trained LERO Traffic Guides or authorize LERO traffic Guides themselves to control traffic.
LERO has the capability to remove obstructions from public roadways.
i Under the "Best efforts" assumption, the LERO plan assumes that Suffolk County would intervene and prevent the use of emergency equipment LERO would provide.
The LERO plan provides for LILCO active. ting the prcmpt notification system with legal authority provided by the offsite officials.
It is assumed that the offsite officials will be cooperative and no time will be lost in implementing the procedures for sounding the sirens and activating the EBS.
The LERO plan assigns personnel to all major entrances to the EPZ to guide traffic entering and leaving the EPZ. The LERO plan expects that Suffolk County personnel will continue to perform their normal functions by providing access control at the EPZ perimeter and will accommodate this response.
-1 c
- f. <* ) l, '
- r )
- it
- *). G k i Lf
i 0 t
7
[(
p r
/
.w
/
j '*
' ' f -
I xj i c.,,
fff).E.J!(LN0favh00.3Cnw,..b,6jf@(
fl-
/1 0 C
+w NMw.:, Sf f x c. L h ;.-a,,, 2
.d N I be Sola&Y OuS<hcora.e Jn
}m 2 r4 M
L, R $ p h u ~6.3 a s hH'L8
\\
h f N4%~s / Niw hw nido,dQ s m%C%)
hh 1.4$m %-0w ~ n c m u,'~cv
%AnQ N
wwe
%h vwv
+g1q %wp aac
~
sp%% W JA h, u gg und
% dewytlWAMd
= w JG we ~ ~%
Sh
, OPL $ %dM bp y u g t ;9+ _p p % $ p f g b
tgi l 4
s-
_ _u.
+L ~
3A&
A,,wm
%~
%L,
. c h sc d Tk."
d, mas..
/1x
F
\\
A I
,N
'~
~s 13
'Ps>
%., % ; k b := : x.. ')-ca a u.
f l lP.A
'\\,,,
g.
qudh~
g n -
I u A Jng (wd..f Rwy n+L L~L -
1 mJ - pm -,+e.a 3 Etz
- I m m 5?
cC42 m,4 -
V im t
t D
)
W Ku w3S ~%
G ur y
a,
%rm S EttN5 Q ~
i k : N ') Es.bw - af p.
2 % 1 % =
n k G'. 4 ~3 m
hRh d
pU 2e3e M,C A 4 2 E r z D 3 y y
l 971uC-ekt6NL 9 c. & v I t dl a u. a c
- 3. O L 6_s-& %
s' JJ u1 E m - &Jg: L 4
>.5. wh %A B t,dc-s1 % 4
,* 9-Add 4
9 9
e M
s rv.
- s. g.s NU' ( 7tm 1
's Aj A 1d G
J n
~
Iw%
%R l
('h Y 3
\\
~
h M SW G W404Y
~
Y rs&% m -n d
1 i
E IO'e M L1k um In ~~(* d
.fd7
,asNs a -
-Mu C ew.c
- %a -
m _1 6 24 +e L:l I M
\\
- Me.? )3
/
a w
..;cc-p cb a 4 & ~ o u A lu L n o &,
v4 I
._s a
.a a 4 a
.p-
---E
{
-4 8
% f;
~
U L e c n c o -e eu m u a )..- ; c s c L s
ea)GE i
\\
\\
@da b-b y,a L.d,Lec A-L;m5 Aa.,
7 te m ya N bdQ Aw!d n
24 S
w q-
&f Rg ny 7
c s
up a
k
- $ w m N no e h d ~ > T u k,,)
EL L 6 C ~T~A cA al sjs
~
I 4
d i
\\
-- _