ML20203G488: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = MEETING MINUTES & NOTES--CORRESPONDENCE, MEETING SUMMARIES-INTERNAL (NON-TRANSCRIPT)
| document type = MEETING MINUTES & NOTES--CORRESPONDENCE, MEETING SUMMARIES-INTERNAL (NON-TRANSCRIPT)
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
| project = TAC:62897
| stage = Meeting
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:,
July 28,' l!r86 i    Docket No.: 50-412                                                  DISTRIBUTION
                                                                      ; Docket F,11e    P. Tam NRC PDR        OGC APPLICANT:            DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY ET.AL.                Local PDR      E. Jordan PAD #2 Rdg      B. Grimes                        >
FACILITY:            BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2                        J. Partlow      ACRS (10)
L. Rubenstein  D. Miller
 
==SUBJECT:==
 
==SUMMARY==
OF MEETING ON JULY 1, 1986 - PREPARATION FOR ONSITE EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION (EQ) AUDIT In the October 1985 Safety Evaluation Report, the staff indicated that an EQ audit will be conducted (confirmatory issue 14). By {{letter dated|date=May 23, 1986|text=letter dated May 23, 1986}}, the applicant submitted the Equipment Qualification Report, and requested a meeting with the staff in preparation for the staff's EQ audit.
The requested meeting was held on July 1, 1986 in Bethesda. Enclosure 1 is the agenda and Enclosure 2 is the attendee list of the meeting. Enclosure 3 contains informal comments transmitted to the applicant prior to the meeting.
The applicant provided copies of an informal document entitled "Duquesne Light Company Responses to NRC Comments on the BVPS-2 Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Report Dated May 1986." Since that document is not yet considered formal, and since the applicant expects to eventually submit the material in that document in the near future, it is not being included as an enclosure to this sumary. Those who wish to receive a copy of that draft document should contact the project manager.
Technical discussion was centered on the material in the draft document.
Staff coments and technical concerns were noted by applicant personnel. These                                        4 concerns are expected to be addressed by the applicant before or during the EQ                                        )
audit.
The audit may take place in August but the exact date has not been picked. It is expected to last three days and will be performed by three to four auditors.
Peter. S. Tam, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
==Enclosures:==
l As stated f'
cc: See next page L:      #2          PM: PAD
                                                }
D: PAD #2 j
ler              PTam:h        LRubenstein 7/ /86                7/23/8        7/2//86 8608010181 860728 PDR        ADOCK 05000412 A                        PDR
 
Mr. J. J. Carey Duquesne Light Company                  Beaver Valley 2 Power Station cc:
Gerald Charnoff, Esq.                  Mr. R. E. Martin, Manager Jay E. Silberg, Esq.                    Regulatory Affairs Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge      Duquesne Light Company 1800 M Street, N.W.                    Beaver Valley Two Project Washington, DC 20036                    P. O. Box 328 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. C. W. Ewing, Quality Assurance      Zori Ferkin Manager                                Assistant Counsel Quality Assurance Department            Governor Energy Council Duquesne Light Company                  1625 N. Front Street P. O. Box 186                          Harrisburg, PA 15105 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Room B-151 Transportation & Safety Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. T. J. Lex                          Mr. Thomas Gerusky Westinghouse Electric Corporation      Bureau of Radiation Protection Power Systems                          PA Department of Environmental P. O. Box 355                          Resources Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230          P. O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. P. Raysircar Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation BVPS-2 Records-Management Supervisor P. O. Box 2325                          Duquesne Light Company Boston, Massachusetts 0?107            Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. W. Troskoski U. S. NRC                              John A. Lee, Esq.
P. O. 181                              Duquesne Light Company              i Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077        1 0xford Centre                      l 301 Grant Street Mr. Thomas E. Murley, Regional Admin. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15279 U. S. NRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 15229 l
 
Gelowee                        (
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 Meeting on EQ July 1,1986 o Opening Statements
                      - NRC
                    - Duquesne Light Co.
o Technical Discussion (the following items and others will be discussed, in any order):
                      - Duquesne Light Co.'s Equipment Qualification Report i                      -
NRC staff / consultant's comments
                      - How EQ Team audit will be done
                      - Dates for EQ audit?
o Caucus (if needed) o Concluding Remark by NRC 1
1
            -    w -    ,- -,w w w-w- -
                                          . , , - -    ~-a    e,-- ,,--- , -+ - w -- -    3 ,- - - - - , - - - ,-r---  --
 
i (n c {os ure  Z BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 Meeting on EQ l
July 1, 1986                                        !
Attendee name                    Organization                            i Q4e,S. Tam                        Licea:.      P<gj.sigc.,      A/R R.
b(A kAI&,r                        PAeEI ,      Pu A-A ,A/ M M*E TA&w3M                          IN6L gag Qf#
Dsue. % h ~                      t NEL    E nge.
KEa u.nassacA                      b uAvxs a u c.a r co em T Etw ANW T)ag uesn e l'7U [* , Jiz. E n g12.  ,
fosg E. (( ARrsu                huguesv6 h64T N'0 A*T* W A/,R,equrnsiz9 e                  Dvqoasur Les ar,engit,cau.sm.r m -
  /2 &        Mn ce n
: 4) Alo"Otr- EYsfery J~M Gw,c;n y                      g &s w o n g          Sig J & //aslam                      s vEC        p a w e c E ,,gi,> . . c-D.K'iNV                        5 u)EC      E.9. engincer e , u).Eu te                    Sufc        E. d. En q i new l
l
 
n      -            -
b losmt      1 BVPS-2 EQ SU8MITTAL                                    ..
SECTION                            REVIEWER'S COMENTS                      __
Letter dated        Discuss how the numbers were arrived at in paragraph 2 May-23, 1986,        of this letter. The reviewer counts approximately 102 from J.J. Carey      packages that contain components located in a harsh on-to H.R. Denton      vironment instead of 88. For those packages that              -
contain NSSS-supplied components where no scow sheets were provided, indicate whether these packages contain equipment located in harsh or mild environments.
1.2.2 &              Provide astypical example of how the Arrhenius 1.2.3                methodology was incorporated by BVPS-2 in establishing a qualified life and post-DBA operability time (preferable a component with a qualified life of 40 years and a post-DBA operability requirement of one year.
Identify those exceptions pointed out'in Section 1.2.2 and the justification for using the normal average service temperature instead of the maximum normal service temperature.
Tables 1-1,1-2,      Provide an in-depth discussion on the methodology 1-3, and 1-4        incorporated by 8VPS in establishing the master list.
It is quite obvious that BVPS has identified their components in their EQ program; however, the staff needs more specifics on how the master list was developed. Because of the number of components on the master. list that are missing pertinent information (see last page of Table 1-2), provide a sunniary of that portion of 2BVM-128 that addresses the class IE mester list.
Spec. # 193 on Table 1-2 is not described in Table 1-1.
2.2.4(3),(6),8(10)  Provide a justification for not assuming plate-out for qualification of equipment inside the containment Paragraph 2.24(6) needs clarification.
2.2.5(3)            The audit of BVps-2 may be deferred until the completion of the review depicted in section 2.2.5(3) regarding the impact of using revised mass / energy release curves.
2.2.7                BVPS-2 position regarding margin in paragraph 1 is in direct contrast to the NRC staff position on margin.
(See resolution to comments 70A-C of NUREG 0588, Part          ,
II.)
2.4(2)              Provide those NS$$ components that do not meet the required one-hour /10% operating time margin requirement, along with the justifications for these components.
 
s BVPS-2 EQ SUBMITTAL      .
SECTION (Continued)                              REVIEWER'S COMMENTS 3.3.2                        Section 3.11 of BVPS-2 FSAR is referenced in regard to the NSSS post-accident requirements and identification of specific long-term periods for each type of                      ,
component. This particular section in 3.11 could not be found by the reviewer.
Appendix A                    Note three states that 2 X 108 rads include gamma 7 Table IV                      and beta doses. For ingide the crane wall, 8.7 X 10                    l rads gammq and 1.5 X 10' rads beta is given for the                    l accident contributors. How was 2 X 108 rads derived as an adequate qualification level from these two doses?
3.3.6                          Provide the project-specific position papert for the                  :
following IE notices / bulletins-IEIN 81-20 IEIN-81-29 IEB 82-04, M IEIN 82-11, IEIN 82-52. IEIN 83-38, IEIN 83-40, IE1N 83-45. IE1N 83-72, IE1N 84-23, IEIN 84-44, IEIN 84-47, IEIN 84-57. IEIN 84-68, IEIN 84-78, IEIN 84-90, IEIN 85-39. IEIN 85-40. IEIN 86-02, and IEIN 86-03.                                  .
l provide 2BVM-114 for review.                                          I General                                                                                            !
O H
I
                                                                                                            - --  -e-  .-}}

Latest revision as of 12:06, 7 December 2021

Summary of 860701 Meeting W/Util,Westinghouse & S&W in Bethesda,Md Re Preparation for Onsite Equipment Qualification Audit.Agenda & Attendee List Encl.Audit Expected to Take Place in Aug 1986
ML20203G488
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 07/28/1986
From: Tam P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC-62897, NUDOCS 8608010181
Download: ML20203G488 (6)
v • d • e


Text

,

July 28,' l!r86 i Docket No.: 50-412 DISTRIBUTION

Docket F,11e P. Tam NRC PDR OGC APPLICANT
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY ET.AL. Local PDR E. Jordan PAD #2 Rdg B. Grimes >

FACILITY: BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 J. Partlow ACRS (10)

L. Rubenstein D. Miller

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING ON JULY 1, 1986 - PREPARATION FOR ONSITE EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION (EQ) AUDIT In the October 1985 Safety Evaluation Report, the staff indicated that an EQ audit will be conducted (confirmatory issue 14). By letter dated May 23, 1986, the applicant submitted the Equipment Qualification Report, and requested a meeting with the staff in preparation for the staff's EQ audit.

The requested meeting was held on July 1, 1986 in Bethesda. Enclosure 1 is the agenda and Enclosure 2 is the attendee list of the meeting. Enclosure 3 contains informal comments transmitted to the applicant prior to the meeting.

The applicant provided copies of an informal document entitled "Duquesne Light Company Responses to NRC Comments on the BVPS-2 Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Report Dated May 1986." Since that document is not yet considered formal, and since the applicant expects to eventually submit the material in that document in the near future, it is not being included as an enclosure to this sumary. Those who wish to receive a copy of that draft document should contact the project manager.

Technical discussion was centered on the material in the draft document.

Staff coments and technical concerns were noted by applicant personnel. These 4 concerns are expected to be addressed by the applicant before or during the EQ )

audit.

The audit may take place in August but the exact date has not been picked. It is expected to last three days and will be performed by three to four auditors.

Peter. S. Tam, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

l As stated f'

cc: See next page L: #2 PM: PAD

}

D: PAD #2 j

ler PTam:h LRubenstein 7/ /86 7/23/8 7/2//86 8608010181 860728 PDR ADOCK 05000412 A PDR

Mr. J. J. Carey Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 2 Power Station cc:

Gerald Charnoff, Esq. Mr. R. E. Martin, Manager Jay E. Silberg, Esq. Regulatory Affairs Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Duquesne Light Company 1800 M Street, N.W. Beaver Valley Two Project Washington, DC 20036 P. O. Box 328 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. C. W. Ewing, Quality Assurance Zori Ferkin Manager Assistant Counsel Quality Assurance Department Governor Energy Council Duquesne Light Company 1625 N. Front Street P. O. Box 186 Harrisburg, PA 15105 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Room B-151 Transportation & Safety Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. T. J. Lex Mr. Thomas Gerusky Westinghouse Electric Corporation Bureau of Radiation Protection Power Systems PA Department of Environmental P. O. Box 355 Resources Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 P. O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. P. Raysircar Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation BVPS-2 Records-Management Supervisor P. O. Box 2325 Duquesne Light Company Boston, Massachusetts 0?107 Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. W. Troskoski U. S. NRC John A. Lee, Esq.

P. O. 181 Duquesne Light Company i Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 1 0xford Centre l 301 Grant Street Mr. Thomas E. Murley, Regional Admin. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15279 U. S. NRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 15229 l

Gelowee (

BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 Meeting on EQ July 1,1986 o Opening Statements

- NRC

- Duquesne Light Co.

o Technical Discussion (the following items and others will be discussed, in any order):

- Duquesne Light Co.'s Equipment Qualification Report i -

NRC staff / consultant's comments

- How EQ Team audit will be done

- Dates for EQ audit?

o Caucus (if needed) o Concluding Remark by NRC 1

1

- w - ,- -,w w w-w- -

. , , - - ~-a e,-- ,,--- , -+ - w -- - 3 ,- - - - - , - - - ,-r--- --

i (n c {os ure Z BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 Meeting on EQ l

July 1, 1986  !

Attendee name Organization i Q4e,S. Tam Licea:. P<gj.sigc., A/R R.

b(A kAI&,r PAeEI , Pu A-A ,A/ M M*E TA&w3M IN6L gag Qf#

Dsue. % h ~ t NEL E nge.

KEa u.nassacA b uAvxs a u c.a r co em T Etw ANW T)ag uesn e l'7U [* , Jiz. E n g12. ,

fosg E. (( ARrsu huguesv6 h64T N'0 A*T* W A/,R,equrnsiz9 e Dvqoasur Les ar,engit,cau.sm.r m -

/2 & Mn ce n

4) Alo"Otr- EYsfery J~M Gw,c;n y g &s w o n g Sig J & //aslam s vEC p a w e c E ,,gi,> . . c-D.K'iNV 5 u)EC E.9. engincer e , u).Eu te Sufc E. d. En q i new l

l

n - -

b losmt 1 BVPS-2 EQ SU8MITTAL ..

SECTION REVIEWER'S COMENTS __

Letter dated Discuss how the numbers were arrived at in paragraph 2 May-23, 1986, of this letter. The reviewer counts approximately 102 from J.J. Carey packages that contain components located in a harsh on-to H.R. Denton vironment instead of 88. For those packages that -

contain NSSS-supplied components where no scow sheets were provided, indicate whether these packages contain equipment located in harsh or mild environments.

1.2.2 & Provide astypical example of how the Arrhenius 1.2.3 methodology was incorporated by BVPS-2 in establishing a qualified life and post-DBA operability time (preferable a component with a qualified life of 40 years and a post-DBA operability requirement of one year.

Identify those exceptions pointed out'in Section 1.2.2 and the justification for using the normal average service temperature instead of the maximum normal service temperature.

Tables 1-1,1-2, Provide an in-depth discussion on the methodology 1-3, and 1-4 incorporated by 8VPS in establishing the master list.

It is quite obvious that BVPS has identified their components in their EQ program; however, the staff needs more specifics on how the master list was developed. Because of the number of components on the master. list that are missing pertinent information (see last page of Table 1-2), provide a sunniary of that portion of 2BVM-128 that addresses the class IE mester list.

Spec. # 193 on Table 1-2 is not described in Table 1-1.

2.2.4(3),(6),8(10) Provide a justification for not assuming plate-out for qualification of equipment inside the containment Paragraph 2.24(6) needs clarification.

2.2.5(3) The audit of BVps-2 may be deferred until the completion of the review depicted in section 2.2.5(3) regarding the impact of using revised mass / energy release curves.

2.2.7 BVPS-2 position regarding margin in paragraph 1 is in direct contrast to the NRC staff position on margin.

(See resolution to comments 70A-C of NUREG 0588, Part ,

II.)

2.4(2) Provide those NS$$ components that do not meet the required one-hour /10% operating time margin requirement, along with the justifications for these components.

s BVPS-2 EQ SUBMITTAL .

SECTION (Continued) REVIEWER'S COMMENTS 3.3.2 Section 3.11 of BVPS-2 FSAR is referenced in regard to the NSSS post-accident requirements and identification of specific long-term periods for each type of ,

component. This particular section in 3.11 could not be found by the reviewer.

Appendix A Note three states that 2 X 108 rads include gamma 7 Table IV and beta doses. For ingide the crane wall, 8.7 X 10 l rads gammq and 1.5 X 10' rads beta is given for the l accident contributors. How was 2 X 108 rads derived as an adequate qualification level from these two doses?

3.3.6 Provide the project-specific position papert for the  :

following IE notices / bulletins-IEIN 81-20 IEIN-81-29 IEB 82-04, M IEIN 82-11, IEIN 82-52. IEIN 83-38, IEIN 83-40, IE1N 83-45. IE1N 83-72, IE1N 84-23, IEIN 84-44, IEIN 84-47, IEIN 84-57. IEIN 84-68, IEIN 84-78, IEIN 84-90, IEIN 85-39. IEIN 85-40. IEIN 86-02, and IEIN 86-03. .

l provide 2BVM-114 for review. I General  !

O H

I

- -- -e- .-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20203G488&oldid=3331543"