ML20203G768: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, OTHER U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY/DEPARTMENT TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, OTHER U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY/DEPARTMENT TO NRC
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:.
                                        ,g                                                                  U.S. Departmeent tf Justice                                            $
Y&[h                                      .
Antitrust Division Offic,of the Anistent Attomey General                                      Washington. D.C 20330 JUL 0 t 1986 Joseph Rutberg, Esq.
Antitrust Counsel Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.                  20555 Re:  In The Matter Of Seabrook Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 (Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444), Amendment No. 57 to License Application Dated March 30, 1973, Request for a Partial Transfer of Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-135 and CPPR-136
 
==Dear Mr. Rutberg:==
 
You have requected our advice pursuant to Section 105(c) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, in connection with the purchase by EUA Power Company of an ownership interest in the above-captioned nuclear facility.
EUA Power Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eastern Utilities Associates will purchase an interest totalling ap-proximately 12% of the two Seabrook units from Central Vermont Public Service Hydro-Electric, Corporation,  Company, Maine          Central          Maine Public      Power Service      Company  Company, and Bangor Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Co.                                ,
Our review of the information submitted in connection with the present application, as well as other relevant information, has disclosed no evidence that the proposed participation by EUA Power Company in the Seabrook Units would either create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws under Section 105(c).                  We do not, therefore, believe it is necessary for the Commission to hold an antitrust hearing in this matter.
Sincerely, b l1, P l                                                                                2narles F. Ru h
* Acting Assistant Attorney General,                                                                                '
e 8608040050 860725 PDR      ADOCK 05000443 M                          PDR
                                                                                                                              . . _ _ . _ _ _ .      _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ . -__}}

Latest revision as of 10:49, 7 December 2021

Advises That Based on Review of Util 730330 Amend 57 to License Application,Requesting Partial Transfer of CPPR-135 & CPPR-136,proposed Participation by Eua Power Co Would Not Be Inconsistent W/Antitrust Laws
ML20203G768
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/01/1986
From: Rule C
JUSTICE, DEPT. OF
To: Rutberg J
NRC
Shared Package
ML20203G758 List:
References
A, NUDOCS 8608040050
Download: ML20203G768 (1)
v • d • e


Text

.

,g U.S. Departmeent tf Justice $

Y&[h .

Antitrust Division Offic,of the Anistent Attomey General Washington. D.C 20330 JUL 0 t 1986 Joseph Rutberg, Esq.

Antitrust Counsel Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: In The Matter Of Seabrook Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 (Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444), Amendment No. 57 to License Application Dated March 30, 1973, Request for a Partial Transfer of Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-135 and CPPR-136

Dear Mr. Rutberg:

You have requected our advice pursuant to Section 105(c) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, in connection with the purchase by EUA Power Company of an ownership interest in the above-captioned nuclear facility.

EUA Power Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eastern Utilities Associates will purchase an interest totalling ap-proximately 12% of the two Seabrook units from Central Vermont Public Service Hydro-Electric, Corporation, Company, Maine Central Maine Public Power Service Company Company, and Bangor Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Co. ,

Our review of the information submitted in connection with the present application, as well as other relevant information, has disclosed no evidence that the proposed participation by EUA Power Company in the Seabrook Units would either create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws under Section 105(c). We do not, therefore, believe it is necessary for the Commission to hold an antitrust hearing in this matter.

Sincerely, b l1, P l 2narles F. Ru h

  • Acting Assistant Attorney General, '

e 8608040050 860725 PDR ADOCK 05000443 M PDR

. . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ . -__

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20203G768&oldid=3331467"