ML20207N935: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 22: Line 22:
s                                                                                        l l
s                                                                                        l l
GPU Nuclear Corporation g      gf                                                        Post Office Box 388 Route 9 South Forked River New Jersey 087310388 609 971-4000 Wnter's Direct Dial Number:
GPU Nuclear Corporation g      gf                                                        Post Office Box 388 Route 9 South Forked River New Jersey 087310388 609 971-4000 Wnter's Direct Dial Number:
October 13, 1988 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555 Dear Sir Subjec t:  Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-?!9 Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) No.126, Revision 1 General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation (GFUN), by letter dated February 19, 1988, submitted TSCR No.126, Revision 1 which requested changes to Appendix A of Operating License No. DPR-16. The changes were requested in order to explictly include the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix J.
October 13, 1988 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555 Dear Sir Subjec t:  Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-?!9 Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) No.126, Revision 1 General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation (GFUN), by {{letter dated|date=February 19, 1988|text=letter dated February 19, 1988}}, submitted TSCR No.126, Revision 1 which requested changes to Appendix A of Operating License No. DPR-16. The changes were requested in order to explictly include the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix J.
During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review of this request, a concern relating to rection 4.5.C.2 was identified.                    In a telephone conference call on September 20, 1988, the NRC reviewers stated that deduction of local leak test results from the Primary Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (PCILRT) results is not conservative. GPUN agreed that, since it was acceptable to isolate leakage through a valve by increasing down stream pressure (not to exceed test pressure), section 4.5.C.2 can be deleted from the TSCR.
During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review of this request, a concern relating to rection 4.5.C.2 was identified.                    In a telephone conference call on September 20, 1988, the NRC reviewers stated that deduction of local leak test results from the Primary Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (PCILRT) results is not conservative. GPUN agreed that, since it was acceptable to isolate leakage through a valve by increasing down stream pressure (not to exceed test pressure), section 4.5.C.2 can be deleted from the TSCR.
GPUN has reviewed the 10CFR50.91 determination of no significant hazards considerations which was submitted with TSCR No.126, Revision 1. GPUN has determined the deletion of section 4.5.C.2 does not effect the determination as described in TSCR No.126, Rev.1, since deletion of this section is in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50, Aopendix J.                      For ease of administration, enclosed is a reprint of the TSCR reflecting the deletion of section 4.5.C.2. No other changes have been made to the February 19, 1988 submittal.
GPUN has reviewed the 10CFR50.91 determination of no significant hazards considerations which was submitted with TSCR No.126, Revision 1. GPUN has determined the deletion of section 4.5.C.2 does not effect the determination as described in TSCR No.126, Rev.1, since deletion of this section is in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50, Aopendix J.                      For ease of administration, enclosed is a reprint of the TSCR reflecting the deletion of section 4.5.C.2. No other changes have been made to the February 19, 1988 submittal.

Latest revision as of 17:16, 5 December 2021

Forwards Amended Tech Spec Change Request 126,Rev 1,revising 880219 Application for Amend to License DPR-16 by Deleting Tech Spec Section 4.5.C.2 Since Isolation of Leakage Through Valve by Increasing Down Stream Pressure Acceptable
ML20207N935
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 10/13/1988
From: Fitzpatrick E
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20207N937 List:
References
NUDOCS 8810190487
Download: ML20207N935 (2)
v • d • e


Text

.-

s l l

GPU Nuclear Corporation g gf Post Office Box 388 Route 9 South Forked River New Jersey 087310388 609 971-4000 Wnter's Direct Dial Number:

October 13, 1988 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555 Dear Sir Subjec t: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-?!9 Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) No.126, Revision 1 General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation (GFUN), by letter dated February 19, 1988, submitted TSCR No.126, Revision 1 which requested changes to Appendix A of Operating License No. DPR-16. The changes were requested in order to explictly include the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix J.

During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review of this request, a concern relating to rection 4.5.C.2 was identified. In a telephone conference call on September 20, 1988, the NRC reviewers stated that deduction of local leak test results from the Primary Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (PCILRT) results is not conservative. GPUN agreed that, since it was acceptable to isolate leakage through a valve by increasing down stream pressure (not to exceed test pressure), section 4.5.C.2 can be deleted from the TSCR.

GPUN has reviewed the 10CFR50.91 determination of no significant hazards considerations which was submitted with TSCR No.126, Revision 1. GPUN has determined the deletion of section 4.5.C.2 does not effect the determination as described in TSCR No.126, Rev.1, since deletion of this section is in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50, Aopendix J. For ease of administration, enclosed is a reprint of the TSCR reflecting the deletion of section 4.5.C.2. No other changes have been made to the February 19, 1988 submittal.

As GPUN is currently shutdown for the cycle 12 refueling outage, the next PCILRT will be performed prior to startup. The PCILRT is scheduled to begin on December 19, 1988. Therefore, GPUN requests that TSCR 126 Revision 1 be reviewed as expeditious', as possible so that the PCILRT may be accomplished in conformance with the requested changes.

8810190487 G31013 #

PDR ADOCK 05000219 P PDC , g GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Pubhc Utihties Corporation

If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. George W. Busch at (609) 971-4909.

Very truly yours, L

E. E. Fitz atrick Vice President and Director Oyster Creek EEF/GB/smz (0599A)

Mr. William T. Russell, Administrator Region !

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Alexander W. Dromerick, Project Manager 11.5. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Division of Reactor Projects I/II Washington, DC 20555 NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station forked River, NJ 08731

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20207N935&oldid=3319238"