ML20234F471: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20234F471
| number = ML20234F471
| issue date = 10/30/1964
| issue date = 10/30/1964
| title = Forwards Press Release Re Util Decision to Withdraw Application for Bodega Bay Atomic Plant.Partial AEC Press Release & Partial ACRS 641020 Ltr Also Encl
| title = Forwards Press Release Re Util Decision to Withdraw Application for Bodega Bay Atomic Plant.Partial AEC Press Release & Partial ACRS Also Encl
| author name = Whelchel C
| author name = Whelchel C
| author affiliation = PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
| author affiliation = PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Line 12: Line 12:
| case reference number = FOIA-85-665
| case reference number = FOIA-85-665
| document report number = NUDOCS 8709230133
| document report number = NUDOCS 8709230133
| title reference date = 10-20-1964
| package number = ML20234A767
| package number = ML20234A767
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 7
| page count = 7
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 17:47, 6 October 2021

Forwards Press Release Re Util Decision to Withdraw Application for Bodega Bay Atomic Plant.Partial AEC Press Release & Partial ACRS Also Encl
ML20234F471
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 10/30/1964
From: Whelchel C
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Price H
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709230133
Download: ML20234F471 (7)


Text

1 l

e i s'

r 5-

\.,

039 dh P ClFIC GAS AND ELECT.RIC COMPANYJfp l ;l 246 Market Street San Francisco 941o6

..H LCHEL SUtter 1 4212 October 30, 1964 1

1 1

Mr. Harold L. Price Director of Regulation U.S. Atomic Energy Cotamission Washington, D.C. 20545  ;

Dear Mr. Price:

Enclosed is a copy of the release being made to i I

the press this morning on Bodega.  !

Sincerely yours, To .c .

J CCW:ca Enclosure i

l l

P G

!^ i.2 l

> :r

. Z. n.,d_

r

. E! .. . ,

POS N $;.

W.% c]

0.6Es  ?~

E s- '.2 B',.

e, E to s

s 8709230133 851217 ",d M. M*.

PDR FOIA Pog t~ '

FIREGTO o * ** ,85-6,65 Dde & S g"- q3S Thc. y .y g--------

g ,--, -

j

_ . _ . . . . .._...,_7 ,_,,,,y....,,-_..,,_.._.m._...,..,. , , , . . . . , . . . _ . _ . . . _ . . . , , . . . . __,_. ,.4

g P G .a* E; NEK ' BUREAU (

I 245 M A R M.T STR E ET. =

SAN FRANCISCO 6. CALIF.

...... T ELE PHON E SU f.4 211 FOR DOEDIATE RELEASE

  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company President Robert H. Gerdes announced today that the Company has decided to withdraw it$ application to the Atomic Energy Com-mission for the Bodega Bay Atomic plant.

Mr. Gerdes' statement follows:

"We have repeatedly stated that if any reasonable doubt ~ exists about the safety of the proposed Bode 6a plant, we would. not consider going forward with it..

"The Bodega site and the en6ineering 4.eaign of the plant were studied ex-tensively and confirmed as safe by eminent consultants in geology, seismology and i seismic design. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, a;2 independent Group of twelve eminent scientists and engineers established by law to advise the Atomic Energy Commission, came to the same conclusion. We are convinced that these views are sound.

"The regulatory staff of the AEC, however, has recently reported that it ,

+

has some doubt 'at the present state of our knowledge' about the capability of the structure to withstand the maximum assumed earthquake. Although a6reeing that 'the i .>

proposed engineering principles appear reasonable,' the Staff has expressed concern I over the lack of any experimental or experience proof-test of them.

"The doubt raised by the Staff, although a minority view, is sufficient to cause us to withdraw our application. We vould be the last to desire to build a plant with any substantial doubt existin6 as to public' safety.

"We have made provision for adequate electric generating capacity elsewhere to take care of our customers' needs for the several years immediately ahead.

(more) o -

, .w 5, 7=, .ep ru e pestpre. pes.ev==o _,,,-ee., ww.r -m. w '= y* w w. s,+ pew w r== s n

  • P t -w w t*** =**.s p** 4
  • ip e- + te ; ~ e t r '"* N"***'+ & *" 8'M 7 " "'* r' * ~P
-c -

.L .u . 1 ,

4 , , . _. , , _ , ,

j'i .

i 4 I h ,

  • ' , ,, . / ' ' , '

f

,. /.... (

.e. }

., c l

Our decision to withdraw the Bodega application does not mean we have' lost L .;

any confidence whatsoever in nuclear-electric generation.. Atomic plants are safe and- ,1 q

l dependable, as experience in California and elsewhere has shown. Nucleex fuel is -l l."

plentiful and rapidly is becoming the most econcaic heat sourco lfer pcwer generation. -

.,L l

Its application is especially important for meeting the future energy needs of' grow- -

ing California.

"RHkE's purpose remains, as' always, to provide our. customers with the most -

efficient, reliable and safe service at the lowest feasible rates. Further develop- ~i ment of this important peaceful use of the atom is essential to' thib objective." <

i e

d j I

4 14 10-30-64 -!

de 8

6 1

\

i 6

9 4- .

. . 1 t___. .__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~_ _ $$ _

_],'"M'***'9' 7

  • }_** "__

__ =_ _, _* =lv

  • e s** p+=- -

1

)

i

/FRfM ' ~

'CONTC Miltct '

Pastila See and Electrie Co, '

N "Acf!ON COMPLETION DEADLINE J<...-

, , g, g, gg g DATE OF DOCUMENT F'

'.OCATION . ~~

'TO

~ .

jg_Q ' ,

t +--

r .-

' % e3 9 I d Ie* b 4

~ ACTION PROCES$ LNG DATE$

Ac knowl.Jp.g INF ORMATIONAL COP 1 0.'$ TRl8 UTION -

  1. I Geirmen O DN5 FOM 3"3* d'P"d rM JDA ts et __

n,,, D g,.

i FJnot 0CC tLR DESCRIPTf,0H E0T @Or'.gan1 A. .D. 11L DCopr 'OO'he, w/atM. REuARgs

' - ut C' Ltr. emelesia4 espy of the relenos being made to the L. psess 10/30/ 4 an,medege. 5 empies for file distribution

'M s ,9 l .

.xEFER.rEO TO Dave

_ gREcA_RE FOR sicHATURE OF, gp E. Psies fAfe 11/3/M CH^'""*" [- -

g jj [/ /g.,

specify) aseder.o. .> . ........... .. .................. i

,- j t

//j 7p g

  • ll

~

' +

DO NOT DETACH THIS COPY DlRECTOR OF REGULATION COMMUNICATIONS CONTROL Form NQ.32 (744) -__ .

U.S.AEC 1FROM . '

( CONTR UMBER 7 # A' 7N COMPT.ETlON DEADLINE-PanNb3, .

N as and Electrfs Co. -h

-g, C,, gebyggg DATE OF DOCUMENT FILE LOCATION i TO

- - - - _ U/Nl$

I ACTION PROCESSING D ATE 5 RAfekt L PT$48 Ac knowledged INFORMATIONAL COPY DISTRIBUTION

  1. h* mon A.DNS t'OM laterim Report. CM A_ D A t$

nep. Dir. nCC (LR P inei l

DESCRIPTION ber A. .D . Jt L u(

$0elginal QCopy D o'her */* M e REMARK 5

- Ltr. enclosias eeP7 *O the wateams bei.e6 made to the 5 espise for isle distribattoa press 10/30/M en Dadese. .

3 s

v '

REPERRED TO DATE.

PREPARE FOR SIGNATURE,0F 4 k 4 4"EJPtrifi~fAfe- 11/3/M N CH ^'" "* "

?, i

. ..gL 3

~_-

DIRECTOR OF leECULATION I

f jN' .e h (specify) r e.n --

3 C -p .5

. .... .... ........... l usaderses g t ..

................ .... 2 00 NOT DETACH THIS COPY DIRECTOR.0F REGULATION -- -

COMMUNICATIONS CONTROL i'5 AEd ( 4 }'* -

s

- - w .e ~s + * - "C*1* #

"

  • i '"~~E" F ' d

L, t

~

dlhlTED STATES h ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIO W A SHI N GTON, D.C. *20545 i

No. G-247 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAdo Tel. 973-3335 or (Tuesday, October 27, 1964) 973-3446 AEC RELEASES TWO REPORTS ON PROPOSED REACTOR AT BODEGA HEAD, CALIFORNIA The Atomic Energy Commission today is making public two reports concerning the safety aspects of a nuclear power plant proposed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company at Bodega Head, approximately 50 miles north of San Francisco.

One report is from the Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, a group estab,lished by law to advise the AEC on safety matters involved in r,eactor construction and operation. The ACRS has concluded that there is reasonable assurance that the proposed reactor can be constructed and operated at the Bodega Head site without undue hazard to the j health and safety of the public.

The other report, by the Division of Reactor Licensing, has been issued by the AEC Director of Regulation, whose staff makes safety reviews of reactor licensing applications. The Regulatory Staff has concluded that " Bodega Head is not a suitable location for the proposed nuclear power plant at the present state of our knowledge."

Under AEC regulatory procedures, a decision by the i Commission on PG&E's application will not be made until after the holding of a public hearing and issuance of an initial decision by a three-member atomic safety and licensing board.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company has applied to the Commission for~a permit to construct a 325,000 electrical kilowatt boiling water reactor at the south end of Bodega

, Head, a peninsuka sbparating Bodega harbor from the Pacific Ocean. The proposed reactor site is approximately 1000 feet west of'the western edge of the San Andreas fault zone.

The application for a provisional construction permit was made on December 28, 1962. Nine amendments.to the appli-cation have been received. In addition to information provided (more) /

i- ,

l.

1 4

.,_...-~y ,, , , . ,y.,,_~--- -.-._ _._, _ . .g ..y. ..;~,_.m..,-.. . . , . . . - . . . , . . . . -%

(

. ATTACHMENT #1

.s -

l ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS UNITED STATES ATOMIC Ef4ERGY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 25. O.C.

October 20,1%4

' Honorable Glenn T. Seaborg -

Chairc:an

, U. S. Atomic Energy Com:nission Washington, D. C.

Suh, ject: REPORT ON BODDGA BAY ATOMIC PARK - UIET NO.1

Dear Dr. Seaborg:

At its fifty-fifth meeting'on May 7-9,1%4 at Argonne, Illinois, and at its fifty-eighth meetin6 on October 7-10,1%4, the Advisory Com-mittee on Reactor Safe 6uards again considered the proposal of Pacific Gas & Electric Company to construct and operate a 1008 W(t) boiling vater reactor on Bouaga Head north of San Francisco, California. The Co=mittee had the benefit of oral discussion with representatives of the applicant and its consultants, with the AEC Regulatory Staff and its . consultants,' including staff members of the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the U. S. Coast and' Geodetic Survey (USC&GS) and of the reports cited below. Subcocznittee meetings were held July 31, 1%2 and March 20,1%3 and members of the Cournittee agaib visited the excavated site on June 3,1%4. Numerous information meetings were held with the applicant, the AEC Regulat' o ry Staff, and with consultants.

This propocal had been considered at the Co'm:nitteel s forty-seventh ineeting and reported on in its letter of April 18,1%3 which stated:

" Tentative exploration indicates that the tractor and turbine buildings vill not be located on an active fault line. The Connittee believes that if this point is established, the design criteria for the plant are adequate from the standpoint of hazards associated with earthquakes. Careful examination of the quartz-diorite tock below should be made during building excavation, to confirm this point. Furthermore, the Connittee suggests that,,4uring design, careful attention should be given lo the ability of emergency shutdown systems to operate properly during and subsequent to violent earth shocks, and to the stress effects that might be introduced bece ase the reactor building and the turbine building are to be anchored in different geological forcations. The need for earthquake-induced shutdown und isolation or the prisaary system can be considered at a later time."

.5 g93gai pi g W+ A A g ,, Nw mig dar5P- M uu 44W-*,*4M 4mde @Mg4'$ uWm 4Mi'W% e',3 8' Es -6 m-r9** efMb$ pe W -tey yp e c g y e am paa,e e.g -4 g ug = = 4 que==wa+mSEM p Der WWW W *8-A 99 jer +7

( .

Att #1 - G-247 .

s Honorable Glenn T. Scaborg 3- october 20,19%

of testing or other experimental' verification of structural design features associated with earthquake protection; provisions to assure adequate cooling vater in case of damage to normal and emergency supply systems; core behavior during earthquakes; design and tests of critical plant ' components such as instrumentation, isolation valves, and control rod operating mechanistas to withstand earthquake damage; additional considerations which may be needed if zirconium clad fuel is to be used. .

The C'o mmittee recognizes that the applicant has accepted very conserva-tive values for earth shear movement, earthquake magnitudes, and taurutmi heights as des 18n criteria. These criteria should not be con-strued as precedents for use elsewhere.

  • With due consideration being given to the items discussed above, the Advisory Con:mittee on Reactor Safeguards is of the opinion that the power reactor facility as proposed may be constructed at this site with reasonable assurance that it may be operated without undue hazard l' to the health and safety of the public.

Sincerely yours,

"~

f =

Herbert Kouts Chairman References Attached.

4

-