ML19347E967: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:hy
{{#Wiki_filter:hy
  .*
(-    m i    lhA              vn.tu;'      f 93                          --
(-    m i    lhA              vn.tu;'      f
  *
        -
93                          --
..
hfa
hfa
                                                                             /t .L5iF rA :c.:-_ -- t ''-M3 fb C
                                                                             /t .L5iF rA :c.:-_ -- t ''-M3 fb C
   ." ,THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COh!PANY                              CINC6HN Atl.OHto 45704
   ." ,THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COh!PANY                              CINC6HN Atl.OHto 45704 f~,
                                                        ,
f~,
March 18, 1981 V                                                                    QA-1408
March 18, 1981 V                                                                    QA-1408
: c.  ,o.ouw, u . ec ..c. . ,
: c.  ,o.ouw, u . ec ..c. . ,
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region lII 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region lII 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Attention: Mr. C. E. Morelius, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection RE: WM. H. ZIM'4ER NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT I NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 81 DOCKET NO.
                  '
50-358, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. CPPR-88, W. O. #57300-957, JOB E-5590 Gentlemen:
  .
This letter consututes our response to tne subject inspection report.      It is our opinion that nothing in the report or in this letter is of a proprietary nature.                                            '
Attention: Mr. C. E. Morelius, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection RE: WM. H. ZIM'4ER NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT I NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 81 DOCKET NO.
___
50-358, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. CPPR-88, W. O. #57300-957, JOB E-5590
                                                                    .              .
Gentlemen:
This letter consututes our response to tne subject inspection report.      It is our opinion that nothing in the report or in this letter is of a proprietary
                                                                ,
nature.                                            '
Our response to the item of noncompliance cited in Appendix "A" of the report is as follows:
Our response to the item of noncompliance cited in Appendix "A" of the report is as follows:
: 1. Corrective A_ction Taken and Results Achieved _                        ,
: 1. Corrective A_ction Taken and Results Achieved _                        ,
Weld HP-16 The weld package which identified Line fi-HP-03-A 14 and the radiographic report as HP-08-C3 has been reviewed and the PSK checked to verify that the proper line number is 1-HP-08-C3.
Weld HP-16 The weld package which identified Line fi-HP-03-A 14 and the radiographic report as HP-08-C3 has been reviewed and the PSK checked to verify that the proper line number is 1-HP-08-C3.
              ,
The film package has been changed to represent the proper number.                                              .
The film package has been changed to represent the proper number.                                              .
Weld FC-46-B The June,1980 radiograph has been reviewed, the repair area verified during the review and the "R-1" etched on the film to reflect the fact that the film included the repaired area.
Weld FC-46-B The June,1980 radiograph has been reviewed, the repair area verified during the review and the "R-1" etched on the film to reflect the fact that the film included the repaired area.
         .              Weld HP-15
         .              Weld HP-15 Following the repair of the three (3) areas, the entire weld has been re-shot. The second radiograph was performed with
    .
Following the repair of the three (3) areas, the entire weld has been re-shot. The second radiograph was performed with
                                                                               ~~
                                                                               ~~
t            8105140 N
t            8105140 N


         /
         /
    -
                    .
              -
       .                                                                                                                        ;
       .                                                                                                                        ;
   >,        Mr. C. E. Norelius, Acting Director
   >,        Mr. C. E. Norelius, Acting Director
           - Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection                                                                    l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III M2rch 18, 19 81, QA-1408 Pcge 62
           - Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection                                                                    l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III M2rch 18, 19 81, QA-1408 Pcge 62 s
                              -
five (5) re-shots measuring the circumference of the                    "R-1" pipe. Although                all five areas are identified as shots, the repaired areas are not identified as such.
s five (5) re-shots measuring the circumference of the                    "R-1" pipe. Although                all five areas are identified as shots, the repaired areas are not identified as such.
The inspector noted that the original film sho' ring the                            We rejected portions of this weld was not available.
The inspector noted that the original film sho' ring the                            We rejected portions of this weld was not available.
have not always retained film showing rejected areas after a successful repair has been made and an accept-
have not always retained film showing rejected areas after a successful repair has been made and an accept-able radiograph obtained.
  .
able radiograph obtained.
Weld FWK-31__
Weld FWK-31__
The penetrameters in the area of interest were identified during the NES audit and the subject weld was re-shot on May 28, 1980, and records            The indicate acceptable technique film  for this RT done on May 28, and weld integrity.
The penetrameters in the area of interest were identified during the NES audit and the subject weld was re-shot on May 28, 1980, and records            The indicate acceptable technique film  for this RT done on May 28, and weld integrity.
19 80, has not been located,                  therefore,      the field weld FWK-31 was re-shot on March 16, 1981, and was found acceptable.
19 80, has not been located,                  therefore,      the field weld FWK-31 was re-shot on March 16, 1981, and was found acceptable.
: 2. Corrective Action To Be Taken To Avoid Further Noncompliance Henry J. Kaiser Company has undertaken a review of all This review has been undertaken packages for HJK welds.to verify that problems similar to those identified b inspector do not exist in other packages already accepted.
: 2. Corrective Action To Be Taken To Avoid Further Noncompliance Henry J. Kaiser Company has undertaken a review of all This review has been undertaken packages for HJK welds.to verify that problems similar to those identified b inspector do not exist in other packages already accepted.
All radiograph packages are reviewed before being trans-
All radiograph packages are reviewed before being trans-ferred to the Site Document Center.                                                              .
                                                                                                                      .
ferred to the Site Document Center.                                                              .
: 3. Date When Full Compliance            ^~v=      -
: 3. Date When Full Compliance            ^~v=      -
Will Be Achieved
Will Be Achieved
:-t .~ -                  .
:-t .~ -                  .
_
_.:                                                                _
[* 5 _ ,3 _ _i t djy JgriL30,J,[
[* 5 _ ,3 _ _i t djy JgriL30,J,[
g-KJhe,gve. review'is ~ expected 'to be comp c e 4 % .1931,_and_this item will.be_in_qompliance at test ~ time _.ac >
g-KJhe,gve. review'is ~ expected 'to be comp c e 4 % .1931,_and_this item will.be_in_qompliance at test ~ time _.ac >
We trust that the above will constitute an acceptable response to the
We trust that the above will constitute an acceptable response to the 4
                                                                  '
4
{
{
_ _ _ _ .
__,,sm ee *7 m-..
_
__,,sm ee *7
                                                                        ,_
m-..
_.:_.._..,_.,;,__ . - - _ . .
_.:_.._..,_.,;,__ . - - _ . .
                                                   , _ , _ 7 m _- -
                                                   , _ , _ 7 m _- -
                                                        -
  -- . _ _
                                                                                                                              --


               /                                                    .
               /                                                    .
      .
             /      Mr. C. E. Ilorclius, Actino Director Division of Ennineerino and T<rchnical Inspection U. S. fluclear Regulatory Comission
             /      Mr. C. E. Ilorclius, Actino Director
                  -
Division of Ennineerino and T<rchnical Inspection
      -
U. S. fluclear Regulatory Comission
   /;,              Region III
   /;,              Region III
             .      flarch 18, 1931, OA-1400 Page #3
             .      flarch 18, 1931, OA-1400 Page #3 subject Inspection Report.
                                .
subject Inspection Report.
  >
          ,
Very truly yours.
Very truly yours.
Tile CIfiCIllflATI GAS & ELECTRIC C0:!PA'lY Dy E. A. P.ORG"Nr;                      .
Tile CIfiCIllflATI GAS & ELECTRIC C0:!PA'lY Dy E. A. P.ORG"Nr;                      .
Line 120: Line 74:
()p          & / 7l o d l / Y                              hI tMtary Public                      ~~
()p          & / 7l o d l / Y                              hI tMtary Public                      ~~
                                                                                                       '' ,/ .vf.l\.Q '.. ' . .... '..,,' f. .
                                                                                                       '' ,/ .vf.l\.Q '.. ' . .... '..,,' f. .
                                                                                                                                        -
                                                                                                                                          , , ,
s _-. . .              w, v
s _-. . .              w, v
* a-              "                    '
* a-              "                    '
VIRGINIA P. T/UMLHOFEil' -( " i                            HOI Notary Pu'./.:. I:::t CT b':h',k, * ,' . '-s
VIRGINIA P. T/UMLHOFEil' -( " i                            HOI Notary Pu'./.:. I:::t CT b':h',k, * ,' . '-s My Co nt:ts;.cn E. pires Je, ?f;. Vi/s *./        :
                                                                                                                  ,.
My Co nt:ts;.cn E. pires Je, ?f;. Vi/s *./        :
f I' f 1/ I, *
f I' f 1/ I, *
                                                                                                            '
                                                                                                               .,                          /
                                                                                                               .,                          /
                                                                                                              '
                                                                                                                     ,,# [/*.':.,;,o' s ,,, torn o s p a a . . C ,,.
                                                                                                                                      .
ATT*N        NOTCD tiETUCN TO.                                                            P00R ORIGWR                                                          l I
                                                                                                                     ,,# [/*.':.,;,o'
                                                                                                                .
                                                                                                .
s ,,, torn o s p a a . . C ,,.
ATT*N        NOTCD
,
'
tiETUCN TO.                                                            P00R ORIGWR                                                          l I
__
_
l e4u0240                                                                                                  . .
l e4u0240                                                                                                  . .
g-    J
g-    J
_}}
_}}

Revision as of 01:54, 31 January 2020

Responds to NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-358/81-03.Corrective Actions:Henry J Kaiser Co Has Undertaken Review of Weld Packages & Field Weld FWK-31 Reshot on 810316 & Found Acceptable
ML19347E967
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 03/18/1981
From: Borgmann E
CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19347E965 List:
References
QA-1408, NUDOCS 8105140431
Download: ML19347E967 (3)


Text

hy

(- m i lhA vn.tu;' f 93 --

hfa

/t .L5iF rA :c.:-_ -- t -M3 fb C

." ,THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COh!PANY CINC6HN Atl.OHto 45704 f~,

March 18, 1981 V QA-1408

c. ,o.ouw, u . ec ..c. . ,

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region lII 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Attention: Mr. C. E. Morelius, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection RE: WM. H. ZIM'4ER NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT I NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 81 DOCKET NO.

50-358, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. CPPR-88, W. O. #57300-957, JOB E-5590 Gentlemen:

This letter consututes our response to tne subject inspection report. It is our opinion that nothing in the report or in this letter is of a proprietary nature. '

Our response to the item of noncompliance cited in Appendix "A" of the report is as follows:

1. Corrective A_ction Taken and Results Achieved _ ,

Weld HP-16 The weld package which identified Line fi-HP-03-A 14 and the radiographic report as HP-08-C3 has been reviewed and the PSK checked to verify that the proper line number is 1-HP-08-C3.

The film package has been changed to represent the proper number. .

Weld FC-46-B The June,1980 radiograph has been reviewed, the repair area verified during the review and the "R-1" etched on the film to reflect the fact that the film included the repaired area.

. Weld HP-15 Following the repair of the three (3) areas, the entire weld has been re-shot. The second radiograph was performed with

~~

t 8105140 N

/

.  ;

>, Mr. C. E. Norelius, Acting Director

- Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III M2rch 18, 19 81, QA-1408 Pcge 62 s

five (5) re-shots measuring the circumference of the "R-1" pipe. Although all five areas are identified as shots, the repaired areas are not identified as such.

The inspector noted that the original film sho' ring the We rejected portions of this weld was not available.

have not always retained film showing rejected areas after a successful repair has been made and an accept-able radiograph obtained.

Weld FWK-31__

The penetrameters in the area of interest were identified during the NES audit and the subject weld was re-shot on May 28, 1980, and records The indicate acceptable technique film for this RT done on May 28, and weld integrity.

19 80, has not been located, therefore, the field weld FWK-31 was re-shot on March 16, 1981, and was found acceptable.

2. Corrective Action To Be Taken To Avoid Further Noncompliance Henry J. Kaiser Company has undertaken a review of all This review has been undertaken packages for HJK welds.to verify that problems similar to those identified b inspector do not exist in other packages already accepted.

All radiograph packages are reviewed before being trans-ferred to the Site Document Center. .

3. Date When Full Compliance ^~v= -

Will Be Achieved

-t .~ - .

[* 5 _ ,3 _ _i t djy JgriL30,J,[

g-KJhe,gve. review'is ~ expected 'to be comp c e 4 % .1931,_and_this item will.be_in_qompliance at test ~ time _.ac >

We trust that the above will constitute an acceptable response to the 4

{

__,,sm ee *7 m-..

_.:_.._..,_.,;,__ . - - _ . .

, _ , _ 7 m _- -

/ .

/ Mr. C. E. Ilorclius, Actino Director Division of Ennineerino and T<rchnical Inspection U. S. fluclear Regulatory Comission

/;, Region III

. flarch 18, 1931, OA-1400 Page #3 subject Inspection Report.

Very truly yours.

Tile CIfiCIllflATI GAS & ELECTRIC C0:!PA'lY Dy E. A. P.ORG"Nr; .

SEllIOR VICE PRESIDENT JP.!:ec cc: !!RC Resident Ins,'ector .

Attn: F. T. Daniels Henry J. Kaiser Co.

Attn: P. S. Gittings R. f4arshall

  • J. R. Schott S. C. Swain W. W. Schwiers State of Ohio ) ss .

County of Hamilton)

Sworn to and subscribed before ne this <2B d day of March, 1981.

,,n.im.....

()p & / 7l o d l / Y hI tMtary Public ~~

,/ .vf.l\.Q '.. ' . .... '..,,' f. .

s _-. . . w, v

  • a- " '

VIRGINIA P. T/UMLHOFEil' -( " i HOI Notary Pu'./.:. I:::t CT b':h',k, * ,' . '-s My Co nt:ts;.cn E. pires Je, ?f;. Vi/s *./  :

f I' f 1/ I, *

., /

,,# [/*.':.,;,o' s ,,, torn o s p a a . . C ,,.

ATT*N NOTCD tiETUCN TO. P00R ORIGWR l I

l e4u0240 . .

g- J

_