ML20082E799

Forwards Responses to NRC Questions Re Scope of Plan to Verify Quality of Const Raised in Encl 1 to 831115 Submittal

ML20082E799
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	11/21/1983
From:	Williams J CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20082E801	List: ML20082E799 ML20082E814
References
LOZ-83-0234, LOZ-83-234, NUDOCS 8311280321
Download: ML20082E799 (3)

Text

_ _ _ . - _ _ _ - . _ _ _

.. O

• 5 4

• THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CIT CINCINN ATI.OMIO 45201 November 21, 1983 LOZ-83-0234 J. WILUAMS, J81

... . c. - ... *"'

_ .. .. _ . E PRINCIP,AL STAFF _

Docket No. 50-358 y@/KA hP

\ _

s-"

7 TNA S

~ cs 48-3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission iA9 v_

~

Region III Tc 799 Roosevelt Road  %"E l

gjo l J Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 E Attention: Mr. J.G. Keppler Regional Administrator Gentlemen:

RE: WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 1 COURSE OF ACPION W.O. 57300, JOB E-5590, FILE NO. 956C, Attached are responses to NRC iplestions contained in Enclosure 1 of your letter dated November 15, 1983. Responses to Enclosure 2 will be supplied with submittal of the Plan for the Verification of the Quality of Construction (PVOC) and the Continuation of Construction Plan (CCP ) .

Very truly yours, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

RekeerRr/

j$ENIOR VICE PRESpDENT GCF/sfr gjkih!i OO $ g'4 %

A ib

e -

Mr. J.G. Keppler Regional Administrator November 21, 1983 LOZ-83-0234 Page 2 cc: NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement Washington, D.C. 20555 NRC Resident Site Supervisor ATTN: W.M. Hill

.NRC Zimmer Project Inspector, Region III ATTN: E. R. Schweibinz NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations Division of Licensing ATTN: D.G. Eisenhut

L.L. Kintner l

ENCLOSURE 1 ,

Questions & Comments on the Course'of Action (COA)

1. With regard to the PVQC inspection program, certain elements -

of your program are still not clear to us. We believe your program of reinspection of accessible work must contain the following:

a. A 100% visual' inspection of all accessible structures, systems, and components. This inspection should be sufficiently comprehensive to assure that attributes that can be seen visually are in conformance with applicable drawings and specifications, codes and standards, and quality records.

b. Physical inspections (nondestructive and destructive) for those cases where the quality records have been questioned.

c. Additionally, sampling physical inspections (as proposed in your October 5, 1983 COA) of structures, systems, and components where the quality records have not been questioned.

Please provide clarification of your intentions with respect to the above three items.

Our intent is as you have stated in your comment. The details will be included in the PVOC. See also the

. discussion of physical inspections in our letter (LOZ 0233) to Mr. Keppler dated November 18, 1983 (copy attached).

.