ML20138P143

Rev 0 to Procedure CP-QP-11.5, General Procedure for Random Insp

ML20138P143
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date:	12/19/1979
From:	TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138M609	List: ML20138M606 ML20138M651 ML20138M794 ML20138M800 ML20138M811 ML20138M820 ML20138M824 ML20138M832 ML20138M839 ML20138M847 ML20138M852 ML20138M864 ML20138M881 ML20138M892 ML20138M899 ML20138M915 ML20138M926 ML20138M943 ML20138M955 ML20138M959 ML20138M964 ML20138M970 ML20138M974 ML20138N671 ML20138N674 ML20138N677 ML20138N681 ML20138N686 ML20138N697 ML20138N700 ML20138N703 ML20138N708 ML20138N712 ML20138N716 ML20138N821 ML20138N861 ML20138N868 ML20138N872 ML20138N876 ML20138N888 ML20138N994 ML20138P014 ML20138P087 ML20138P090 ML20138P094 ML20138P098 ML20138P112 ML20138P114 ML20138P116 ML20138P122 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 CP-QP-11.5, NUDOCS 8511060433
Download: ML20138P143 (3)

Text

,- ,

PROCEDURE ISSUE NUMBER REVISION PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO DATE CPSES CP-qP-11.5 0 12-19-79 1 of 3 GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR RANDOM INSPECTION PREPARED BY: j ec

/? f//f IfATE' APPROVED BY:

/7!8/'/[

6 ATE

1.0 REFERENCES

CONTROL h 0.%WA 1-A CP-QP-15.0, " Tagging System" _1 ww i , p 1-B CP-QP-16.0, "Nonconformances and Deficiencies" O#

2.0 CENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE 6

The purpose of this procedure is to outline the basic approach to be employed by QA/QC persoi...al in developing and performing random inspection (QA/QC Surveillance) of construction activities.

2.2 DEFINITIONS 2.2.1 Lot A collection of product or work activities from which a sample is to be drawn and inspected in accordance with specified g requirements and written directives.

2.2.2 Sample A statistically sound unit of product or work activities drawn from a lot at random (and without bias) to be inspected in depth as a means of assessing or evaluating the acceptability of the product or work activities.

2.2.3 Inspection The process of measuring, examining, testing, observing or otherwise comparing the unit. of product or work activitics with the specified requirements.

8511060433 851016

.' PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR p,,,,. . 3. 3 Tur3CO OA m~ - = m . - . - w e- v;. _,

-- _,-  ;-.-.g m . .:.

PR U NU BER REVISION PAGE E

TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.

CPSES CP-QP-ll.5 0 12-19-79 2 of 3 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 SPECIFIC DIRECTIVES Specific written directives for random inspection activities shall be jointly developed by the Quality Engineering and Quality Control Supervisors or their designees. Other principal staff personnel may also generate directives applicable to their area of responsibility. These directives shall clearly define to assigned QA/QC personnel the methods and techniques to be imple=ented to obtain the objectives of the inspection (surveillance) effort. These directives shall include the rational to be employed in selecting the lot and guidelines or directives in establishing an appropriate sample from the lot to be inspected. Directives shall be formalized through formal or informal memorandum or through formal Quality Instructions supplementing this procedure. If directives are formalized by memorandum, appropriate controls shall be. established to assure that assigne3 QA/QC personnel are kept aware of and utilize the latest directives.

3.2 DOCUMENTATION METHODS AND REPORTING Written directives shall specify the documentation methods to be employed by QA/QC personnel to report the results of random inspection activities. The inspection results shall be documented by the assigned QA/QC personnel in the prescribed manner and the completed records shall be submitted to the Quality Engineering (QE) Supervisor for further processing and ultimate filing in accordance with CPSES requirements for QA Records.

3.3 . MANAGEMENT REPORTS The Quality Engineering Supervisor or his designee shall review the results of the random inspection activities for completeness and accuracy prior to filing in the Records Vault. Inspection results shall also be summarized by the QE group in a manner suitable for analysis of the significance of the inspection results and to assess the need for corrective action necessary to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected. The provisions of Ref. 1-A and/or 1-B shall be implemented by the QE group where deemed necessary

- TUCCO C 4

Y TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.

CPSES CP-QP-ll.5 0 12-19-79 3 of 3 to properly control nonconforming materials, parts or components.

The inspection summaries shall be formally reported to the Site QA Supervisor and Manager, Quality Assurance at a minimum quarterly frequency. Recommendations for corrective action shall be included if warranted by the inspection (surveillance) results.

i I

.s

~. ~,c c o r _ ~,

, ._ . . . . . _ .