ML20127M785
| ML20127M785 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1993 |
| From: | Greger L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Stratman R CENTERIOR ENERGY |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127M789 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9301290014 | |
| Download: ML20127M785 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000440/1992024
Text
.
- %g
UNIT E D STATES
4
%
NUCLEAn REGULATOnY Commission
'i'
$
> ct
'S
REClON 111
r<
'-l
m noostvett aoao
og
g
ctcN ctLvN. scuNois som
,,
"'
JAN 21893
Docket No. 50-440
Centerior Service Company
ATTN: Mr. R. A. Stratman
Vice Presideht
Nuclear - Perry
c/o The Cleveland Electric illuminating
-
Company
10 Center Road
Perry, OH 44081
Dear Mr. Stratman:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. A. Vegel, E. Duncan, and
1 Hopkins of this office on November 21 through December 28, 1992.
The
inspection included a review of activities authorized for your Perry Nuclear
Pe.wer Plant, _ Unit 1, f acility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the-
findings were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the
enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.
Within
these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
activities in progress.
!
Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of
Violation (Notice).
Violations #1 and #2 are of concern because a
contributing causal factor in these events was personnel error. The issue of
i
personnel errors is of continued concern due to past problems in this area.
Concerning violation #3, although we have noted an improvement in the
,
chanliness of some areas of the Perry plant, including the Division 11 and
l
11! diesel generator rooms, the overall general-cleanliness condition of the
plant continues to be of concern.
Durug this inspection, two additional items appeared to be in violation of
NRC requirements. However, as described in the enclosed inspection report,
,
L
you identified these violations.
Therefore, the violations will not be
l
subject to enforcement action because your efforts in identifying and
l
correcting the violations meet the criteria specified in Section VII.B of the
l-
"Gerioral Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
}
(Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1992)).
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. With respect to Violations #1 and #2,
we recognize that your corrective actions for these specific problems were
l
9301290014 930idi
'~
ADOCK 05000440
/,
i.
G
,.
.--
.
-.
JAN 21893
.
Centerior Service Company
2
.
documented in their respectise Licensee Event Reports (LERs).
We do not
require any additional information with respect to those specific items.
We
do however request that you include in your response a summary of your overall
corrective action program to reduce personnel errors, your timetable for full
implementation, and the status of your progress towards achieving this
timetable.
You are also requested to specifically address in your response to
the Notice what actions will be taken to improve and sustain plant
cleanliness.
After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your
proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC
will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure
compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
l
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
.
jf
LGM G-
L. Robert Greger, Chief
'
Reactor Projects Branch 3
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-440/92024(DRP)
4
See Attached Distribution
i
4
J
1
i'
,
.
.
.
.
-
-
,
,.
. - . ,
>
s
.
.
.
.
3
Centerior Service Company;
.
r
g.
Distribution
cc w/ enclosures:
~
~F. R. Stead, Director, Nuclear
.
Support Department
-1
D. P. Igyarto, General Manager,
1
Perry Nuclear Power Plant
K.:P. Donovan, Manager,-
,
licensing and Compliance Section
1
S. F. Kensicki, Director, Perry
. Nuclear Engineering Dept.-
'
H. Ray Caldwell, General-
Superintendent Nuclear Operations
-
DCD/DCB (RIDS):
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspector, RIII
Terry J. Lodge, Esq.
James _R. Williams, State of Ohio
Robert E. Owen, Ohio, Department of Health
A. Grandjean, Ohio Public Utilities Commission
.I
,
,
L
_
-