ML19341D667
| ML19341D667 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19341D657 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-80-36, 50-270-80-32, 50-287-80-29, NUDOCS 8104080372 | |
| Download: ML19341D667 (2) | |
Text
. _,. -
.O APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, Oconee 1, 2, 3 and 50-287 License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55 As a result of the inspection conducted on December 8-12, 1980, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following victations were identified.
A.
Technical Specification 6.4.1 requires that the station shall be operuted and maintained in accordance with approved procedures and that written procedures with appropriate eneck-off lists and instructions be provided for radtation control procedures.
l'echnical Specifications 3.9.3 and 3.10.9 requires sampling, and analysis of liquid and gaseous radioactive wastes for radiostrontium.
Contrary to the above, the station was not operated in accordance with written approved procedures in that on December 10, 1980 there were no written approved procedures for radiostrontium analysis of liquid radio-active wastes and gaseous radioactive wastes.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E. ).
B.
Technical Specification 6.4.1 requires that the station be operated and maintained in accordance with approved procedures and that written procedures with applicable checkoff lists be maintained for radiation control procedures, operation of radioactive waste management system, and nuclear safety-related periodic test procedures.
Contrary to the above, the station was not operated in accordance with written approved procedures in that (1) during the period of September 10, 1980 to December 10, 1980, the daily performance checks were not performed in the manner specified by Procedure HP/0/B/1000/67; (2) on February 6, 1980 and other occasions, the accuracy performance checks for boron analysis were out of limits and were not repeated as required by Procedure CP/0/B/100/3; and (3) during 1980 some precison control (Larts for phosphate; boron, and chloride analysis were not dated as required by Procedure CP/0/B/100/3.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a
written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial 8104080 D D
e Appendix A Docket Nos. 50-209, 50-270 Notice of Violation and 50-2S7 of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) i the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violattens; and (5) the date w h...
full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section IS2 of the Atcraic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, his respcase shall be submittel under oath or a f firnation.
I l
~
Date:
1 e
k
... -