ML18018A565
| ML18018A565 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1983 |
| From: | Mcduffie M CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TASK-3.D.1.1, TASK-TM LAP-83-113, NUDOCS 8306270241 | |
| Download: ML18018A565 (252) | |
Text
RKGULAT( INFORMATION DISTR ISUTION+STKM (RIOR)
AGCKSSION NBRs8306270241 DOCGDATE: 83/06/22 NOTARIZED! NO DOCKET FAOIL:50.000 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Planti Unit lr Carolina *05000400
- 50 401 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plantg Unit BYNAME 2~ Carolina 05000401 AUTH AUTHOR AFFILIATION MCOUFFIEfMNA~ Carolina Power 8 Light Co, "RK'CIP ~ NAMEI RECIPIENT AFFILIATION OENTONrH ~ RE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulationg Director SU8JECT
- - Forwards draft SER open 'item 100gproviding ref to correspondence 8 status info Addi open items include NRC
~
8300ili0503 8, 24 ltrs< 8 telecopied Q~list itemsraudit items 8 evaluation of THI Item III.Decisis D'ISTRIBUTION CODE: 8001S. COPIES RECEIVED:LTR, ENCL I SIZE' TITLE Licensing Submi t tal: PSAR/FSAR Amdts 8 Related Correspondence NOTKS: M~ SW RECIPIENT .
COPIES REC IP IENT COPIES IO COOK/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL NRR/DL/ADL 0 NRR L83 BC 1 0 NRR L83 LA 1 0 KADAMBIz P 01 .1 1 INTERNALs ELD/HOSl 1 0 IE FILE 1 1 IE/DEPER/EPB 36 IE/DEPER/IRB 35 1 1 IE/DFQA/QAB 21 NRR/DE/AEAB 1 0, NRR/DE/CEB NRR/DE/EQB il 13 2 1
1 "2
NRR/DE/EHEB NRR/DK/GB 28 1
2 1
2 NRR/DE/MEB 18 1 NRR/OE/HTEB 17 1 NRR/OE/SAB 20 1 NRR/DE/SGEB =25 1 1 ~
NRR/OHFS/HFEBuo 1 1 NRR/DHFS/LQB
,NRA/OHFS/PSRB 1 NRR/DL/SSPB 1 0 NRR/osi/AEB 2e 1 1 NRR/DS I/ASB NRR/DS I/CPB 10 1 NRR/DSI/CSB 09 1 1
~ NRR/DS I/ICSB 16 1 NRR/DSI/METB 12 1 1 NRR/OSI/PSB. 19 1 RAB 22' NRR/DSI/RSB 23 1. IL 04 1 1
'3 RGN2 3 3 M /MIB 1 0 EXTERNALR ACRS Ql e BNL(AMDTS ONLY) 1 1 FEMA~REP DIV 39 .1 DMB/OSS (AMOTS)
LPOR 05 1
,1 1
1 NSIC 1 1 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRFD; LTTR 53 ENCL 46
o I ~ 1 N
9( 191 t I>>t << ~ 1>> I i WC r IIII 9(
rf>>99 r ((>> ~ q )I 9(
I'I 4 !>>. I W WT
'1 I (w 3 1 r W'
( W g . ~ " ~
r w l
<<ll ' 1'I W') 9 99'I (i ~ .9 y
<<t 9
9' li If ii I 9>>
tl >>
W it << ~ W '9 9
It It It H
ii<< t >>
k
CRQD CaroHna Power 8 Light Company SERIAL: LAP-83-113 MON g 3 )Bg3 Mx. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NOS ~ 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS ~ 50-400 AND 50-401 DRAFT SAFETX EVALUATION REPORT OPEN ITEM LOG
Dear Mr. Denton:
Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L) is herewith submitting to the Staff our Draft Safety Evaluation Report (DSER) Open Item Log for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SHNPP) Unit Nos. 1 and 2. This log was pxepared aftex receipt of the DSER from the Staff in order to identify open items and txack their status. Many items are from DSER Table 1.2, and others were identified in the DSER text. We used a sequential numbering system.
The CP&L Log is formatted by NRC Branch (alphabetically) and reviewer, and it shows both an "NRC Branch/reviewer" identification system and the CP&L sequential numbering system in the left column. We are transmitting our "Open Items Index" which,is a cross reference of the two numbering systems.
The CP&L Log has a column titled "Date of Submittal to NRC" which gives the date of correspondence to NRC responding to each Open Item, if appropriate. This log will provide each NRC Branch reviewer with a reference to correspondence and status information for that reviewer's items.
Appropriate pages of the attached log are being sent directly to each individual NRC Branch reviewer as shown on the log sheets.
Recently, CP&L has received additional open items from NRC. These include letters dated April 11, 1983 (LgB), May 3, 1983 (JAB and MTEB) and May 24, 1983 (MTEB) in addition to telecopied items received recently (MEB Q-list items, SEB audit items, and METB's evaluation of TMI Item III.D.1.1).
Please expedite completion of branch reviews and formal transmittal of newly-identified open items. This will allow CP&L to support timely issuance of the Safety Evaluation Report by responding to all open items as quickly as possible.
8306270241 8530004200 PDR ADQCK 050 PgR' P,
p,at 411 Fayettevllle Street o P. O. Box 1551 o Raleigh, N. C. 27602
s k
ss A fi
Mr. H. R. Denton Please contact my staff should you or the individual reviewers have any questions regarding the attached information.
Yours very truly,
+ ~ Pal'~
M. A. McDuffie Senior Vice President Engineering 6 Construction JAM/kj r (6673 JAM)
At tachments cce Mr. N. Prasad Kadambi (NRC) Mr. Wells Eddleman Mr. G. F. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP) Dr. Phyllis Lotchin Mr. J. P. O'Reilly (NRC RII) Mr. John D. Runkle Mr. Travis Payne (KUDZU) Dr. Richard D. Wilson Mr. Daniel F. Read (CHANGE/ELP) Mr. G. 0. Bright (ASLB)
Chapel Hill Public Library Dr. J. H. Carpenter (ASLB)
Wake County Public Library Mr. J. L. Kelley (ASLB)
~ w (
I
~ 'I )4k,W oil ' .IC I" IKh< 4 Ll 4
~ 4 1
OPEN ITEM INDEX Open Item Open Item Open Item Open Item CPGL No Branch/Reviewer No. CPGL No. NRC Branch/Reviewer No.
1 SEB/SBK-1 43 MTEB/BE-9 2 SEB/ SBK-2 44 MTEB/BE-10 3 SEB/ SBK-3 45 RSB/Crh-1 4 SEB/ SBK-4 46 RSB/8N-15 5 SEB/SBK-5 47 RS B/6N-16 6 SEB/ SBK-6 48 RSB/CIIi -20 7 SAB/CF-1 49 RSB/BN-8 8 MTEB/JL-1 50 RSB/<+-9 9 MTEB/JL-2 51 RSB/~N-2 10 MTEB/J L-3 52 RSB/am-10 ll EHEB/RG-1 EHEB/RG-2 53 54 RS B/5h-11 AEB/KD-2 12 13 EHEB/RG-3 55 AEB/KD-5 14 EHEB/ RG-4 56 RSB/f +-1 2 15 EHEB/RG-5 57 RSB/5+-19 16 EHEB/RG-6 58 CSB/ JH-1 17 GSB/PS-1 59 CSB/JH-2 18 GSB/PS-2 60 CSB/JH-3 19 SGEB/OOT-1 61 CSB/JH-4 20 S GEB/OOT-2 62 CSB/ JH-5 21 SGEB/OOT-3 63 CSB/JH-6 22 SGEB/OOT-4 64 CSB/JH-7 23 SGEB/OOT-5 65 CSB/JH-8 24 SGEB/OOT-6 66 CSB/JH-9 25 SGEB/OOT-7 67 CSB/JH-10 26 SGEB/OOT-8 68 CSB/JH-11 27 CPB/ JV-1 69 CSB/JH-12 28 CPB/ JV-2 70 CSB/JH-13 29 CPB/JV-3 71 CSB/JH-14 30 CPB/JV-4 72 CSB/JH-15 31 CPB/JV-5 73 RSB/ -17 32 CPB/JV-6 74 RSB/ -18 33 CPB/JV-7 75 ICSB/HL-1 34 MTEB/ BE-1 76 ICSB/HL-2 35 MTEB/ BE-2 77 ICSB/HL-3 36 MTE8/ 3 E-3 78 ICSB/HL-4 37 MTEB/BE-4 79 ICSB/HL-5 38 MTEB/JH-1 80 ICS B/ HL-6 39 MTEB/BE-5 81 ICSB/HL-7 40 MTEB/ BE-6 82 ICS B/ HL-8 41 MTEB/BE-7 83 ICSB/HL-9 42 MTEB/ BE-8 84 ICSB/HL-10
Open Item ~ Open Item Open Item Open Item CP&L No. NRC Branch/Reviewer No. CP&L No. Branch/Reviewer No.
85 ICSB/HL-11 126 PSB/ET-25 86 ICSB/HL-12 127 PSB/ET-26 87 ICSB/HL-13 128 ASB/NW-1 88 ICSB/HL-14 129 ASB/NW-2 89 ICSB/HL-15 130 ASB/NW-3 90 ICSB/HL-16 131 ASB/NW-4 91 ICSB/HL-17 132 ASB/NW-5 92 ICSB/HL-18 133 ASB/NW-6 93 ICSB/HL-19 134 AS B/NW-7 94 ICSB/HL-20 135 ASB/NW-8 95 ICSB/HL-21 136 ASB/NW-9 96 ICSB/HL-22, 137 ASB/ NW-10 97 ICSB/HL-23 138 ASB/NW-11 98 ICSB/HL-24 139 ASB/NW-12 99 ICSB/HL-25 140 ASB/NW-13 100 ICSB/HL-26 141 ASB/NW-20 101 ICSB/HL-27 142 ASB/NW-21 102 PSB/ET-1 143 ASB/HW-22 103 PSB/ET-2 144 CMEB/JW-1 104 PSB/ET-3 145 CMEB/JW-2 105 PSB/ET-4 146 CMEB/JW-3 106 PSB/ET-5 147 CMEB/JW-4 107 PSB/ET-6 148 CMEB/JW-5 108 PSB/ET-7 149 SPB/ET-27 109 PSB/ET-8 150 PSB/ET-28 110 PSB/ET-9 151 PSB/ET-29 111 PSB/ET-10 152 PSB/ET-30 112 PSB/ET-11 153 PSB/ET-31 113 PSB/ET-12 154 PSB/ET-32 114 PSB/ET-13 155 METB/JH-1 115 PSB/ET-14 156 METB/JH-2 116 PSB/ET-15 157 METB/JH-3 117 PSB/ET-16 158 METB/JH-4 118 ESB/ET-17 159 METB/JH-5 119 PSB/ET-18 160 METB/JH-6 120 P SB/ET-19 161 METB/JH-7 121 PSB/ET-20 162 METB/JH-8 122 PSB/ET-21 163 METB/JH-9 123 PSB/ET-22 164 METB/JH-10 124 PSB/ET-23 165 METB/JH-11 125 PSB/ET-24 166 METB/JH-12
l
.?" w Open Item Open Item Open Item Open Item CP&L No. NRC Branch/Reviewer No. CP&L No. Branch/Reviewer No.
167 METB/JH-13 207 PSRB/SM-10 168 RAB/RPS/SB-1 208 PSRB/SM-11 169 RAB/RP S/ SB-2 209 RSB/EM-13 170 RAB/RPS/SB-3 210 RSB/EM-14 171 RAB/RPS/SB-4 211 AEB/KD-1 172 RAB/RPS/ SB-5 212 RSB/EM-3 173 RAB/RPS/ SB-6 213 RSB/EM-4 174 METB/JH-14 214 RSB/EM-5 175 METB/JH-15 215 RSB/EM-6 176 METB/JH-16 216 RSB/EM-7 177 METB/JH-17 217 PSRB/RJU-2 178 METB/JH-18 218 AEB/KD-3 179 METB/JH-19 219 RSB/EM-21 180 METB/JH-20 220 QAB/JG-1 181 METB/JH-21 221 HFEB/RJE-1 182 METB/JH-22 222 Deleted 183 METB/JH-23 223 ICSB/HL-28 184 METB/JH-24 224 ASB/HW-14 185 METB/JH-25 225 .
ASB/NW-15 thru 19 186 METB/JH-26 226 METB/JH-34 187 METB/JH-27 227 Deleted 188 METB/JH-28 228 METB/JH-36 189 METB/JH-29 229 METB/JH-37 190 METB/JH-30 230 .METB/JH-38 191 METB/JH-31 231 METB/JH-39 192 METB/JH-3 2 232 Deleted 193 METB/JH-33 233 Deleted 194 PSRB/RJU-1 234 Deleted 195 PSRB/RJU-3 235 ~
RSB/EM 196 SGPR/DK-1 236 Deleted 197 EPLB/Js-1 237 CPB/DP-8 198 PSRB/SM-1 238 MEB/QAB 199 PSRB/SM-2 239 Deleted 200 P SRB/ SM-3 240 Deleted 201 PSRB/SM-4 241 RSB/ EM-25 202 PSRB/SM-5 242 CSB/JH-17 203 PSRB/SM-6 243 MEB/DT-1 204 PSRB/SM-7 244 MEB/DT-2 205 PSRB/SM-8 245 MEB/DT-3 206 P SRB/ SM-9 246 MEB/DT-4
Open Item Open Item Open Item Open Item CP6L No. NRC Branch/Reviewer No. CP&L No. Branch/Reviewer No.
247 MEB/DT-5 287 MEB/DT-45 248 MEB/DT-6 288 Deleted 249 MEB/DT-7 289 EQB/RW/AM-1 250 MEB/DT-8 290 EQB/RW/AH-2 251 MEB/DT-9 291 EQB/ RW/A%a-3 252 MEB/DT-10 292 Deleted 253 MEB/DT-ll 293 MTEB/JH-2 254 MEB/DT-1 2 294 RSB/EM-22 255 MEB/DT-13 295 Deleted 256 MEB/DT-14 296 Deleted 257 MEB/DT-15 297 Deleted 258 MEB/DT-16 298 RSB/ EM-23 259 MEB/DT-17 299 RSB/EM-24 260 MEB/DT-18 300 Deleted 261 MEB/DT-19 301 Deleted 262 MEB/DT-20 302 Deleted 263 MEB/DT-21 303 CSB/JH-16 264 MEB/DT-22 304 PSB/9C-1 265 MEB/DT-23 305 PSB/OC-2 266 MEB/DT-24 306 PSB/OC-3 267 MEB/DT-25 307 PSB/OC-4 268 HEB/DT-26 308 PSB/OC-5 269 MEB/DT-27 309 PSB/OC-6 270 HEB/DT-28 310 PSB/OC-7 271 MEB/DT-29 311 PSB/OC-8 272 MEB/DT-30 312 CMEB/ RE-1 273 MEB/DT-31 313 CPB/HR-1 274 MEB/DT-3 2 314 EPB/JS-1 275 MEB/DT-33 315 EPB/JS-2 276 MEB/DT-34 316 LQB/FA-1 277 MEB/DT-35 317 LQB/FA-2 278 MEB/DT-36 318 LQB/FA-3 279- MEB/DT-37 319 LQB/FA-4 280 MEB/DT-38 320 LQB/FA-5 281 MEB/DT-39 321 LQB/FA-6 282 MEB/DT-40 322 LQB/FA-7 283 MEB/DT-4 1 323 . LQB/FA-8 284 MEB/DT-4 2 324 MTEB/DS-1 285 MEB/DT-43 325 MTEB/DS-2 286 HEB/DT-44 326 HTEB/DS-3
Open Item Open Item CPGL No. i%RC Branch/Reviewer No.
327 MTEB/DS-4 328 MTEB/DS-5 329 MTEB/DS-6 330 MTEB/DS-7 331 MTEB/DS-8 332 MTEB/JS-1 (6374PSAkj r)
c6!litJ KjPfQMA~~~~/
ATTACHMENT 1
I 0
l
SHNPP-1 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO THE DCPDR SUMY~Y REPORT ENTITLED nHUMAN FACTORS DESIGN EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE SHEARON HARRIS UNIT 1 CONTROL ROOM" MAY 13, 1983
I ij t
r"
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
- 1. Introduction 1-1
- 2. DCRDR Program Plan 2-1
- 3. Implementation of DCRDR Recommendations 3-1
- 4. Evaluation Team Composition 4-1 APPENDICES A. Human Factors Evaluation Group Resumes (Essex)
B. Human Factors/Operations Support Group Resumes (Essex)
C. Project Management/Nuclear Operations/Plant Engineering and Design Group Resumes (CP&L)
l I
I I
\
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Shearon Harris Unit 1 Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) was discussed at a 4'arch 25, 1983 meeting between the NRC Human Factors Engineering Branch and the Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L). During the meeting, CP&L agreed to provide the following additional information to the NRC on the DCRDR:
o Description of the DCRDR Program Plan o Disposition of the DCRDR Summary Report recommendations o Description of DCRDR team composition and their qualifications Sections 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 of this submittal provide the requested information. Zn addition, Appendices A, B, and C provide the detailed resumes of the key members of the DCRDR team.
The information included in this submittal supplements the DCRDR Summary Report filed with the NRC Staff on December 7, 1982. As supplemented, CP&L believes that the DCRDR Summary Report meets the requirements of Sections 5.2(a) and 5.2(b) of Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737 (Generic Letter No. 82-33) dated December 17, 1982. Furthermore, CP&L believes that the information provided to the Staff on the DCRDR attests to the extensive, good faith efforts initiated by CP&L to incorporate human factors engineering concepts into the control room design prior to the promulgation of the DCRDR regulatory requirements; describes the commitment by CP&L to major revisions to control room design, arrangement, hardware and procedures; and demonstrates that the SHNPP Unit 1 control room will enhance the safety of plant operations.
1-1
2.0 DCRDR PROGRAM PLAN 2.1 Introduction The Shearon Harris Unit 1 Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) was conducted from April 1980 to January 1981.
Draft NUREG CR-1580 was used as the primary source of criteria and the review was conducted using human factors test and evaluation methods and procedures. The test procedures were modified as required for the conduct of a design review as opposed to evaluating a.plant in operation.
The SHNPP-1 DCRDR Summary Report was completed prior to the September 1981 issuance of NUREG-0700, which provided NRC
~uidance for conducting a ncRCR. CRaL is confident that the SHNPP-1 DCRDR will provide results comparable to those that could be achieved by following strictly the ~uidance contained in NUREG-0700. The SHNPP-1 DCRDR will meet all NUREG-0737.
Due to the stage of construction, the majority of the review was conducted using engineering drawings, vendor documentation, and other plant design documents. The Harris simulator was also used where applicable. This was primarily for component surveys and to perform an assessment. of emergency procedures and operator tasks and activities.
A review process was initiated by CP&L to ensure the highest quality DCRDR possible. This process consisted of Essex Corporation personnel generating the Human Engineering Discrepancies (HEDs) based on criteria in Draft NUREG/CR 1580 and the Essex Corporation field project manager providing the first review and verification. Next the CP&L project manager and his assistant reviewed the HEDs for accuracy and completeness and concurred w'th the potential operational problems the HEDs indicated. After this review, Essex Corporation management reviewed and initialed the HEDs. HEDs were then presented to a group of people at the site for review and resolution. These people consisted of Essex Corporation, Ebasco, Westinghouse, and CP&L training, engineering, construction, and operations personnel.
A number of features could not be assessed due to the early stages of construction, such as light and noise levels. These features were defined in Human Engineering Requirements Specifications. These specifications, or HERSs, will be used during final design evaluation, construction, or procurement.
The DCRDR addressed three major areas of Human Factors Engineering (HFE) when evaluating the control room design features. These are:
2-1
(
I l
I I
(
o The main control board layout and design, including annunciator arrangements o Anthropometrics and workspace which addressed reach and vision envelopes on equipment and equipment arrangement in the control room.
o Emergency procedures, operator tasks, and a systems operation review The DCRDR was not conducted in three independent sequential processes. Rather, these three areas were reviewed and evaluated in a coordinated parallel manner, as data and information generated in one area was frequently needed in another. As an example, it is essential for an adequate control board layout review to include procedural information and anthropometric data.
2.2 MCB Review The Main Control Board (MCB) review revealed a number of component grouping and sequencing problems. A redesign effort for the control board layout which corrected all of the identified discrepancies was performed as directed by the CP&L Project Manager. This redesign effort required a system-by-system reconfiguration of all components on the board and was accomplished by CP&L and Essex personnel using a scaled 2-dimensional mockup with movable components.
Demarcation, mimics, and labels were also developed during this activity. The developed layouts were translated into engineering drawings and given a final review by CP&L, Westinghouse, Ebasco, and Essex.
During the MCB redesign effort all annunciator windows were reviewed for message content, function, and MCB location.
The current MCB reflects the component layout, panel labels, demarcation and mimic lines, and the rearranged annunciators which resulted from this redesign work.
Essex Corporation and CP&L believe that when the Westinghouse Owner's Group task analysis and generic guidelines become available and SHNPP EOPs are written, that a verification and validation will reveal few if any Human Factors concerns with the current MCB.
2.3 Anthropometrics and Workspace The anthropometrics and workspace review involved two separate activities. First, reach and vision envelopes were developed for the MCB profile and for vertical panel consoles. This was done prior to the MCB component rearrangement work and is described in Appendix C of the 2 2
I E
l 0
f I
Summary Report.'hese data were based upon existing information for the 5th percentile female through the 95th percentile male general population. The data then served as reach and vision criteria for MCB layout and the other control room equipment.
The control room workspace was evaluated using preliminary control room equipment arrangement drawings, draft vendor drawings, and sketches of the backpanel configurations.
This evaluation is described in Appendix D of the summary report. Operator visual and physical access to these backpanels were evaluated and recommended rearrangements were reviewed by CP&L, Ebasco, and Westinghouse. Final rearrangement recommendations were implemented with appropriate changes made to cable trays and conduit penetrations during control room floor construction. Major changes made to the arrangement improved operator physical access by shortening the pathways between various locations at the MCB to each backpanel. Physical obstacles were also eliminated which blocked many pathways on the original arrangement. Visual access was improved by moving backpanels closer to various MCB locations and arranging equipment so visual line-of-sights from various locations were not blocked. The current arrangement represents a significant improvement not only over the original SHNPP-1 layout but over many of the traditional arrangements found throughout the industry. The rearrangement eliminated long rows of backpanels, which, due to their component configur-ations, frequently present large homogeneous visual fields to the operator; eliminated visual and physical obstacles between the operator MCB positions and the backpanels; and also located backpanels relative to their related areas on the MCB. As an example, startup and generator relay back-panels were originally located across the room and closest to the nuclear safety systems on the MCB. The rearrangement placed them much closer to the turbine-generator area of the MCB and separated them out from an original string of 10 backpanel cabinets.
2.4 EOPs and Systems Review Emergency Operator Procedure (EOP) performance and systems operations were assessed continually during the course of the DCRDR. Harris emergency operating procedures were not available during the review period; however, CPaL revised and modified a set of H. B. Robinson Unit 2 EOPs for use on the SHNPP-1 simulator. These modified H. B. Robinson procedures were also reformatted to incorporate human factors concerns such as readability and comprehensibility.
These procedures were used at the simulator to video-tape operator act'vities during simulated real-time and slowed time emergencies. Abnormal and normal operations 2-3
t I
l J
t 0,
were also video recorded. These video tapes were given an in-depth, iterative review by senior human factors specialists. Developed task flows were analyzed for various human factors concerns such as operator task loading, operator information/ action coordination, and operator-operator interactions.
Other operational information was obtained from H. B. Robinson operators cross-trained to SHNPP-1 and through document reviews such as the FSAR and system descriptions.
SHNPP-1 symptom-based EOP's are currently under development and will be task analyzed prior to implementation. The results of this analysis will be fed back into the EOP's and the DCRDR.
2.5 Human Engineering Requirements Specifications (HERS)
Development and Use As stated earlier, a number of design features such as light, noise levels, and components yet to be purchased could not be evaluated. Instead, Human Engineering Requirements Specifications, called HERSs, were developed and then applied as controls for construction and procurement. Data collected at the simulator on such items as controls and meters were used as input into these HERSs.
A complete list of the HERSs developed include:
0 Annunciator Systems 0 Color Codes or Strip Chart Recorders Pens and Pointers 0 Computer Systems 0 Demarcation and Mimic Lines 0 Labeling 0 Rotary Selector Switches 0 Status/Monitor Light Boxes 0 Vertical Indicators 0 Ambient Illumination 0 Control Room Furnishings 0 Control Room Temperature, Humidity, and Ventilation 0 Emergency Procedures 0 Noise 0 Procedures 0 Protective Equipment 0 Temporary Labels 0 Voice Communications, Unaided and Telephone CPSL is utilizing the HERS. to ensure human factors principles are considered in the areas which could not be evaluated during the SHNPP-1 DCRDR.
r I
l I
- 3. 0 IMPLEYiENTATION OF DCRDR RECOK~iENDATIONS The Shearon,Harris Unit 1 DCRDR report provided a series of recommendations. CPaL has acted on each of those recommendat'ons. Table 3-1 provides a summary of CPaL resolutions for each DCRDR recommendation.
3-1
l
(
j f
I l
t t
'I p
TABLE 3-1 CPSL RESOLUTION OF SHNPP-1 DCRDR RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY
REPORT SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION RESOLUTION 2.4 Use the Human Engineering Require- The HERSs are being utilized to ensure ments Specifications (HERS) to ensure Human Factors principles are considered in the incorporation of good Human the areas which could not be evaluated Factors Engineering (HFE) design during the SHNPP-1 DCRDR. Exceptions to concepts to the SHNPP-1 Control Room. the HERSs will be justified and approved by CPGL management. on a case-by-case basis.
3.4a The MCB design developed by CP&L in The redesigned MCB resulting from the response to the DCRDR Human Factors SHNPP-1 DCRDR has been implemented.
Discrepancy (HED) reports be imple-mented.
The design techniques and review The design techniques and review process process used to revise the MCB design u ed in the MCB design will be utilized for in response to the HED reports be changes in the MCB.
implemented when making any subse-quent MCB modifications.
3.4b All discrepancies identified on All HED reports generated during the DCRDR remaining HED reports should be have been reviewed and resolved. The resolved. resolution of the 134 HED reports is as follows:
49 HEDs resolved by rearrangement of the control board ll HEDs resolved by a hardware change on the main control board
t RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY
REPORT SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION RESOLUTION o 8 HEDs resolved by a label or meter scale change o 3 HEDs resolved by an administrative or maintenance procedure change o 33 HEDs were withdrawn. They were unique to the simulator and not applicable for the SHNPP-1 Control Room o 4 HEDs were withdrawn. Each HED was defined as not applicable by peer review o 2 HEDs corrective action was taken but the action did not totally resolve the HED. Justification was provided and approved by CP&L management on a case-by-case basis.
o 24 HEDs no corrective action was taken.
Justification was provided and approved by CP&L management on a case-by-case basis. None of these HED's were considered to have safety significance.
- 4. 4a The redesigned annunciator light The revised annunciator light box design boxes developed by CP&L in response is being implemented.
to the DCRDR should be implemented.
4.4b The applicable HERS should be used The HERS are being utilized for this to control the physical character- purpose.
istics, such as labeling, when these annunciators are incorporated into the actual MCB.
I t
I I
I
(
f f
l
RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY
REPORT SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION RESOLUTION
- 5. 4a Pushbutton controls should be located These criteria were met during the MCB design no higher than 64 inches and hand with the exception of the lamp test push-grasp controls should be located no buttons for the SLBs, MLBs, and TSLBs. CPsL higher than 60 inches on the vertical believes these pushbuttons should remain with portion of the MCB. each box as designed and will provide a safe step stool to reach these pushbuttons when necessary.
5.4b Meters requiring a high degree of This recommendation was incorporated into the numerical accuracy when reading, design of the MCB.
should be located no higher than 63 inches (meter center) on the vertical portion of the MCB.
5.4c The control room equipment should be The modified SHNPP-1 CR arrangement has been located as shown in Figure 2 of the implemented.
DCRDR report.
6.4 Complete systems operations and .task This analysis will be performed when the analysis should be conducted when room is fully functional and the 'ontrol final versions of the procedures and EOP's are implemented and is currently the MCB (actual or mockup) become within the scope of the Emergency Procedures available to verify the findings of development.
the DCRDR.
7.4 The reformatted set of modified H. B. The HBR-2 procedures and the HERS are being Robinson Unit 2 (HBR-2) procedures used as guidelines for the development of-and the HERSs should be used as the SHNPP-1 procedures.
guidelines for the development of the SHNPP-1 procedures.
f I
1)
I t
r I
4.0 EVALUATION TEAM COMPOSITION 4.1 Introduction The SHNPP-1 Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) evaluation team was composed of Essex Corporation and CPGL personnel, which represented a cross-section of the required disciplines. In addition, AE and NSSS vendor representatives provided any required review and comments on design philosophies, discrepancy analysis, and change implementation requirements. The evaluation team can be most easily described as three functionally different groups which were: the Human Factors Evaluation Group, the Human Factors/Operations Support Group, and the Project Management/Nuclear Operations/Plant Engineering and Design Group. The first two groups were composed primarily of Essex Corporation Human Factors Specialists, while the third group was composed of CPaL personnel representing Nuclear Operations, Construction Engineering, various Design Engineering disciplines, Training, and Industrial Engineering. This three-group configuration does not imply that separate, non-communicative roles were performed.
Quite the reverse; this structure imposed an administrative coordination over the review which allowed maximum flexibility. CP&L provided the Project Management/
Coordination function during the course of the DCRDR evalu-ation. Interaction on an individual or group basis was constant throughout the evaluation period. Subsequent paragraphs address the roles of these groups, respon-sibilities of the group members, and the member's qualifi-cations.
4.2 Human Factors Evaluation Group
'This group was composed of six intermediate- and junior-level human factors specialists from Essex Corporation, located in Raleigh, North Carolina. The group's responsibilities were to conduct the data collec-tion, data reduction, and preliminary data analysis phases of the design evaluation. The senior member of this group was also responsible for the Essex administration and management of the Raleigh-based personnel, scheduling and coordination of the evaluation activities, reporting progress to the CP&L Project Manager, and representing the human factors position at HED review meetings.
This group was composed of the following individuals (re sume s are contained in Appendix A):
o Walter T. Talley - Group Supervisor, Research Scientist
l I
I t
t I
0 John Farbry, Jr. Research Scientist 0 Jessica Haher Research Associate 0 Danna Beith Research Associate 0 Thomas Amerson Research Associate Trudy Justice Research Assistant 4.3 Human Factors/Operations Support Group This group was composed of Essex Corporation home office personnel and varied in size and make-up based upon support, requirements of the primary evaluation group. It had a total composition of five senior human factors specialists, one nuclear engineer, two eactor operators; and a data collection team of three junior human factors specialists, one procedures specialist, and one photography specialist. This support group's responsibilities were:
o Essex contract support and management o Review, in-depth analysis, discrepancy definition and discrepancy resolution recommendations, as required o Data collection support o Operational and engineering analysis, if needed This group was composed of the following individuals (resumes are contained in Appendix B):
0 Thomas Malone Behavioral Science Division Director, Senior Research Scientist 0 Kenneth Mallory Director, Energy Systems Programs and Project Manager, Senior Research Scientist Mark Kirkpatrick III Principle Senior Research Scientist Investigator, 0 Robert Kinkade Senior Research Scientist Douglas Metcalf Nuclear Engineering Support Tom Harding Operations Support
t 4
l
Albert Strong Operations Support 0 Elliot Steele Research Assistant, Procedures Specialist 0 Carol Kain Research Assistant Candace Krick Pesearch Assistant 0 Diane Jeorling Research Assistant Timothy O'Donaghue Research Assistant 0 John Jacoby Photographer 4.4 Project Management/Nuclear Operations/Plant Engineering and Design Group This group was principally composed of CP&L personnel and varied in size and make-up based on support requirements as defined by the Project Manager. In addition to the CP&L personnel, this group was supported by AE (Ebasco) and NSSS vendor (Westinghouse) representatives to provide any required review and comments on design philosophies, discrepancy analysis, and change implementation requirements, as directed by the Project Manager.
Two CP&L personnel were assigned on a full-time basis to the DCRDR evaluation team. The Project Manager had multiple roles. In addition to serving as contract adminis-trator, he coordinated the Essex, CP&L, A&E, and NSSS activities to provide the required interaction between the various groups, and he represented the Nuclear Operations Department as an operations specialist on the evaluation team. Assisting the Project Manager as a full-time team member was an Industrial Engineer from the System Planning and Coordination Department. The two full-time CP&L evalu-ation team members were (resumes are contained in Appendix C):
o W. T. Gainey, Jr. Project Manager and Project Specialist Special Projects o D. L. Phipps Senior Industrial Engineer Other CP&L personnel from various disciplines parti-cipated with the evaluation team on a part-time basis to complement the multi-discipline team skill mix, as required.
The part-time CP&L evaluation team members were (resumes are contained in Appendix C):
o D. Cothren Nuclear Plant Engineering Department 4-3
i l
E. Evans Nuclear Plant Engineering Department J. H. Smith Nuclear Operations Department Training William C. Cooper - Nuclear Operations Department SHNPP Startup 4-4
APPENDIX A HUMAN FACTORS EVALUATION GROUP RESUMES
0 WALTER T. TALLEY EDUCATION:
1977 M.S. - Applied Psychology, Stevens Institute of Technology 1970 B.A. - General Experimental Psychology, New Mexico State University 1972 A.A. - Arts and Sciences, New Mexico State University Militar Trainin in Electronics:
1962 Refresher Course in Electronic Fundamentals 1960 Radar Fire Control and Bombing Computer Systems, Republic Aviation Corporation 1955 Radar Fire Control and Bombing Systems EXPERIENCE:
December 1978- ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria Virginia Research Scientist - Responsible for the conduct of assigned prolects >n the Behavioral Sciences Division.
At White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, responsible for the conduct of the human factors engineering evaluation of the U.S.
Army Patriot Air Defense System. Directed the work of one Research Associate in the development of a detailed test plan, various interim reports and new field evaluation techniques and procedures applied to the Patriot System testing. Performed the first non-supplier safety study on the Patriot System and produced the Interim Safety Release Study Report which was essential for the continued evaluation of the system.
At Fort Hauchuca, Arizona, as a member of the Essex quick-response team, assisted in the initial contract phases of U.S.
Army Communications System Test and Evaluation projects.
Duties consisted of the performance of human factors engi-neering evaluations of current and prototype communications equipment and satellite telecommunications systems. Collected and evaluated human performance, environmental, and hardware data. Wrote final reports concerning the compliance of various equipment to existing military human factors specifications and requirements.
As a member of the Essexhuman factors staff, analyzed work performance data and developed a summary report for the ATILT
Company's Human Performance Laboratory concerning cor-rective maintenance task times for telephone company central office switchworkers. Assisted in writing the technical areas of contract proposals for the evaluation of Army weapons systems.
3uly 1978- ALLEN CORPORATION OF AMERICA November 1978 Alexandria, Virginia (White Sands, New Mexico)
Senior Human Factors En ineer - As the project manager of the Corporation's White Sands Office, directed the work of two Senior and one 3unior Human Factors Engineers, and one Secretary/Clerk. Work consisted of Human Factors evaluation of current and prototype U.S. Army Weapons systems. Test plans were developed which established the methodology and scheduling of complete human factors evaluations of operation, maintenance and transportability for tactical and strategic weapons.
September 1970 - BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES 3une 1978 Piscataway, New 3ersey Member of Technical Staff - As a member of computer software development groups, developed specifications for the human interface requirements of large computer-based data manage-ment systems used throughout the Bell Telephone System.
Designed and implemented the specific human interface func-tions from the aforementioned requirements. Developed the performance standards and operational (human performance) definitions of the functional allocations for both the human and the machine in these software systems.
May 1971- DYNALECTRON CORPORATION August 1970 Land-Air Division White Sands Test Facility - NASA Las Cruces, New Mexico Electro/Mechanical Desi ner - Developed various new designs and modifications to existing designs for facilities, structures, and equipment used for destructive and nondestructive materials testing. Produced structural, mechanical, and electrical designs on the modifications to cyrogenic storage and pumping systems.
Also produced drafted drawings and technical illustrations to NASA standards for use in documenting the facility's config-uration and for use in test reports.
February 1970 - DYNALECTRON CORPORATION April 1971 Land-Air Division Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico Medical Illustrator - Produced illustrations for publications and technical reports. Illustrations were in the following categories:
I' ff l
Line Graphs, Charts, Cumulative Records, Equipment Layouts and Anatomy Drawings. Using autopsy procedures, produced preliminary drawings of thoracic musculature of the baboon.
Developed comparative Sacrolumbar, and lower trunk compara-tive anatomical drawings of the human, baboon, and chimpanzee.
September 1968 - A. G. SCHOONMAKER COMPANY, INC.
3anuary 1970 Sausalito, California Pro'ect En ineer - Developed all phases of detailed design requirements for diesel and gas turbine powered generator sets.
Set capabilities were usually in the range of 5000 volt, 2000 kilowatt outputs. Also coordinated total design packages including all mechanical aspects of the units and developed electrical requirements and cost analysis for contract bids.
Electrical design details involved the evaluation of customer contract requirements, translation of them into specific com-ponents, ordering the components and materials and designing the circuits, bus connections, enclosures, front panels and controls. Some technical writing was required in the area of maintenance and operating instructions.
September 1967- ELECTRONICS CONSULTING FIRMS August 1968 San Francisco, California Electronics Technician Research and Development Performed a roa range o tec nician esigner uties as a job-shop employee. Most work was involved in the build-up, modification and checkout of production test equipment for testing missile guidance systems. Additional work performed in the construction and testing of U.S. Army field telecommunications equipment.
August 1962- DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC.
August 1967 Santa Monica and Huntington Beach, California Electronics Technician, Research and Development - Worked in vehicle checkout areas at Santa Monica and Huntington Beach on the initial installation of the Ground Support Equipment for the Saturn SIV and SIV-B Space Vehicles. Performed scheduled periodic maintenance and assisted engineering in trouble-shooting, modification, calibration and functional checkout of this equipment. SIV Ground Support Equipment was manually operated, SIV-B equipment was computer controlled.
May 1955- UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 3une 1962 Su ervisor of Fire Control Section RdcD - At the Fighter Weapons Squadron, Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, Nevada, had charge of five technicians in the Research and Development section. Work involved the design and packaging of RRD projects relating to the testing, modification and extension of Radar Fire Control
f f
Ir E
and Bombing Computer Systems'apabilities on the then current fighter aircraf t; the F-100D and F-105D fighter/bombers.
Rocket and missile systems which were modified and tested consisted of conventional 2.5, 2.75 and 3.25 air-to-air rockets, sidewinder (infrared guided) rockets and the GAM-83 air-to-ground BULLPUP missile. (1961-1962)
Fire Control Technician, RRD - Worked in the Research and Development section of the Fighter Weapons Squadron, Nellis Air Force Base, Las Vegas, Nevada. Technical work responsi-bilities were the same as those listed above. (1959-1961)
Fire Control Technician - Maintained Radar Fire Control Systems in fighter aircraft at Turner Air Force Base, Albany, Georgia. (1958-1959)
Test E ui ment Technician - At the USAF Standards Laboratory in Chateauroux, France, worked on all phases of repair and calibration of general and special purpose electronics test equipment. Designed and built test and calibration benches for new types of equipment as needed. Maintained bench stock supply of all necessary spare parts. (1955-1958)
PERSONAL DATA:
Member of Psi Chi, Psychology National Honor Society Member of the Human Factors Society Military Status - Veteran Enlisted USAF, 3une 8, 1950.
Honorably discharged, 3une 7, 1962.
TECHNICAL REPORTS:
Talley, W. T. and Wenger, W. Interim Safet Release Stud Patriot Missile
~Sstem, Tecom Project DAAD07-79-C-0063, Essex Corporation, October 1979.
Talley, W. T. and Eike, D. R. Human Factors Evaluation of the Communication
. Satellite Ground Control Terminal (AN/TSC-85), Final Technical Report un er ontract ssex orporation, March 1979.
Talley, W. T. and Aikens, R. C. Human En ineerin Re ort Development Test II (P T/G) for the Enhanced Cobra Armament Pro ram Interim . Tecom Project DAAD07-78-C-127, Allen Corporation, November 1978.
Talley, W. T. and Aikens, R. C. Human En ineerin Re ort, Development Test II (P T/G) for the Li htwei ht Launcher (LWL . Tecom Project DAAD07-78-C-0127, Allen Corporation, October 1978.
I f
Talley, W. T. and Aikens, R. C. Human En ineerin Re rt Development Test II (P T/G) for the XM1 Tank S stem. Tecom Project DAAD07-78-C-127, Allen Corporation, October 1978.
II fi'
3OHN E. FARBRY, 3R.
EDUCATION:
1978 Ph.D. - Philosophy, major area of concentration in Experi-mental Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 1973 M.A. - University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 1965 Bachelor of Architecture - Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri EXPERIENCE:
1978 - Present HELLMUTH,OBATA, AND KASSABAUM, INC.
Saint Louis, Missouri Architectural Draf tsman/Research - Commerical structures:
preparation of construction documents, statistical research on firms distribution of manpower across different building types.
Client contact, coordination with structural and mechanical engineers, code analysis.
1977 - 1978 CHINN AND ASSOCIATES Columbia, Missouri Architectural Draf tsman - Commercial and residential structures: preparation of construction documents, coordination with structural and mechanical engineers.
1976 - 1977 STEPHENS COLLEGE Columbia, Missouri Instructor - Department of Psychology. Full responsibility for six courses in Basic Psychology and courses in Psychobiology and the Psychology of Language. Also, student advising and staff seminar participation.
1970 - 1976 MID-MISSOURI MENTAL HEALTH CENTER Columbia, Missouri Research Assistant - Coordinated medical, research, and tech-nical staff for psychological research on stress in hospital patients receiving a difficult examination (endoscopy). Also recording of polygraph data before and during examination, pre-and post-patient interviews, data reduction/preliminary analysis, library research, and assistance with the preparation of'a variety of journal articles.
f
(
l
1973 - 1970 CHINN, DARROUGH, AND COMPANY Columbia, Missouri Architectural Draf tsman - Commercial and residential structures: preparauon o construction documents, coordination with structural and mechanical engineers.
1973 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI Columbia, Missouri Teachin Assistant Architectural Design II and Delineation.
1969 - 1973 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI Columbia, Missouri h
Teachin Assistant - Department of Psychology. General Experimental Psychology (Laboratory Instructor); General Psychology (Course Coordinator, Discussion Leader); and Research Methods, The Senses, Applied Psychology (Assistant).
1969 - 1971 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI Columbia, Missouri Research Assistant - Department of Psychology. Design of collection, and assistance with the writing of journal articles.
1966 - 1968 HELLiVlUTH,OBATA, AND KASSABAUM, INC.
Saint Louis, Missouri Architectural Draftsman - Commercial structures: preparation of construction documents.
1965 A.L. AYDELOTT AND ASSOCIATES Memphis, Tennessee Architectural Draf tsman - Commercial structures: preparation of construction documents.
AFFILIATIONS:
American Psychological Association PUBLICATIONS:
Farbry, 3.E., 3r. Evaluative persistence: Salt from the evaporative forgetting process.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979, 39 (No. 8), 0068 B.
Marx, M.H., Witter, D.W., and Farbry, 3. Greater repetition of errors under performance compared to observation in multiple-choice human learning. Perce tual and Motor Skills, 1973, 37, 909-950.
V J
Shipley, R. H., Butt, 3.H., Farbry, 3. and Horwitz, B. Psychological preparation for endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endosco, 1977, 20, 9-13.
Shipleyy R H ~ BUtty 3.H., Horwitz, B. and Farbry, 3. Preparation for a stressful medical procedure: Effect of amount of stimulus preexposure and coping style. 3ournal of Consultin and Clinical Ps cholo, 1978, 06, 099-507.
Witter, D.W., Marx, M.H., and Farbry, 3. Long-term persistence of response-repetition tendencies based on performance or observation. Bulletin of the Ps chonomic Societ, 1978, 8, 65-67.
Farbry, 3.E., 3r., Geen, R.G., and Hays, D.G. Trait Anxiety and induced muscle tension in verbal problem solving. Unpublished manuscript.
PRESENTATIONS:
Shipley, R.H., Butt, 3.H., Horwitz, and Farbry, 3.E. Videotape preparation for a stressful medical procedure: Effects of number of exposures. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York City, December 1976.
3ESSICA G. HAHER EDUCATION 1979 M.S. - Candidate, Experimental Psychology, George Mason University 1978 B.A. - Biology and Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia EXPERIENCE:
1978 ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Research Assistant - Diablo Canyon Short Term Evaluation, Contract to Nuclear-Regulatory Commission Collected data in the form of videotapes, operator interviews, surveys, and checklists. Generated HED's. Participated in oral presentation of results. Contributed to writing of final report.
Indian Point 2 and 3 CR Evaluation, joint contract to Consoli-dated Edison and PASNY Performed on-site data collection in the form of operator interviews, surveys, and checklists.
Observed videotaping of procedures in the simulator. Reduced data into HED and individual component forms. Verified all data against photo mockup. Interfaced with customer in HED review meetings.
Human Engineering Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plants, con-tract to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reviewed human engineering resource documents extracting excerpts relevant to nuclear power plant control rooms. Revised data collection documents.
TIMI-2 CR Evaluation contract, to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Peformed data collection onsite, at a full-scale mockup of the control room in Alexandria, and at the main office in Alexandria from drawings and pictures. Reviewed reference documents extracting relevant data. Organized and reduced data into charts and tables published in the Text and Appendices of the Final Report. Reviewed literature and collected data to compare TMI with Oconee, (Duke Power) and Calvert Cliffs (BGA'E) Nuclear Power Plant Control Rooms.
Subcontract to NASA contract awarded Kenneth Mallory and Associates, Inc., (KMA) "Performance of Specialized Tasks in Life Sciences Payload Planning" (NASA's Space Shuttle/Spacelab Mission, 1981-1983) Proposal processing support included receipt, logging and distribution of proposals received for inclusion in the Flight Experiments Program.
Subcontract to National Public Service Research Institute to establish a model Driver Improvment Program for Department of Transportation Participated in monitoring, evaluation and revision of program presentation. Disseminated coursework material for classes. Contributed to research preparation, data collection, interpretation and statistical analysis.
Contract "Motorcyles Operations Skill Test," Department of Transportation Administered test procedures and assisted in data collection.
Assisted in the establishment of an expanded Technical Library, including ordering of documents and categorization into Dewey Decimal Card Catalog System.
Assisted the Cybernetics Technology Office of the Defense Advanced Reserch Projects Agency to locate information on new products, companies, organizations, and documents; purchased various equipments and publications. Responsible for meeting the DARPA/CTO office's daily requirements.
DANNA L. BEITH EDUCATION:
1976 B.A. - Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California EXPERIENCE:
1973- XEROX CORPORATION Present El Segundo, California and Rochester, New York Associate Human Factors Desi ner Support to the Human Factors Department in the Business Machine and Copier/Duplicator Divisions. Duties included control systems design, behavioral testing, data analysis and new product assessments.
1978 CANYON RESEARCH GROUP, INC.
Westlake, California Assistant Researcher Contract research assistant to Xerox Corp., In ustria Des>gn/Human Factors Department. Support to Human Factors Department in the Business Machines
'he Division. Duties consisted of control system design and behavioral testing.
1976-1978 BIO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Falls Chruch, Virginia Field Investi ator Northern California and Northern Nevada.
Conducted a "Large Truck Accident Study" for the Federal Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation.
Supervised Field Investigators conducting interviews with truck owners, drivers and California Highway Patrol officers and analyzed accident sites and accident reports. Conducted high-way surveys involving road characteristics, traffic density and speed data using remote control cameras and radar equipment.
1976 GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION University of California General Assistant Office of the Dean. Conducted a study of Professor-Student contact hours and general office duties.
1975 :ARNOLD HOMES FOR CHILDREN, INC.
Sacramento, California Counselor Behaviorist for emotionally disturbed children.
Acted as an Assistant to the Administrative'Counselor as a
Project Researcher to refine and update Behavior Modification Programs.
MEMBERSHlPS: Member of the National Human Factors Society and a member of the Western New York State Chapter of the Human Factors Society.
THOMAS L. AMERSON, 3R.
EDUCATION:
1973 B.S., Mathematics, North Carolina State University Present M.S., Psychology (Ergonomics Program), North Carolina State University. Degree award expected during 1981.
EXPERIENCE: ~
December 1979 - FEARSON AND ASSOCIATES Present Raleigh, North Carolina Consultant. Assisted on a project to study safety attitudes and practices at General Electric Company.
May 1978- NAVALAIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER August 1978 Warminster, Pennsylvania Research Assistant - Assisted with data collection, data analysis, and report writing on an MPA project concerning usability fac'tors for night vision goggles.
August 1976- Teachin Assistant De artment of Ps cholo - Instructed Present undergraduates in psychological perception and sensation.
MEMBERSHIPS:
American Psychological Association, Student Affiliate American Association for the Advancement of Science Human Factors Society, Student Affiliate PUBLICATIONS/TECHNICALREPORTS Amerson, T. L., 3r. Habitability/Accommodation and Endurance Baseline: 20PlTM 79-MPA-002 MPA Phase Report. Prepared at NADC, Warminster, Pennsylvania, 1978.
Mershon, D. H., dc Amerson, T. L., 3r. Stability of measures of the dark focus of accommodation. Investi ative 0 thalmolo 4 Visual Science, 1980, 19, 217-221.
Mershon, D. H., Desaulniers, D. H., Mills, 3. T., Amerson, T. L., 3r., 4 Kiefer, S. A.
Perceived loudness and visually-determined auditory distance. In preparation.
Amerson, T. L., 3r., Little, A. D., R 3ustice, T. D. The convex mirror traffic control aid: A preliminary report on human factors considerations.
Unpublished report submitted to the Traffic Division of the City of Raleigh.
Amerson, T. L., 3r. The dark focus of accommodation and dark convergence:
Time-of-day variations. Master's thesis, in preparation.
Amerson, T. L., 3r., 2 Mershon, D. H. Stability of measures of the dark focus of accommodation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological 'Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 1979.
TRUDY D. 3USTICE EDUCATION:
(Current) B.A., Psychology, North Carolina State University (degree award expected 1981)
EXPERIENCE:
August 1979- NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Present Raleigh, North Carolina Summer Conference Assistant De artment of Residence Life.
Assisted in the coordination and scheduling of housing and dormitory assignments. Logged complaints on facilities and scheduled maintenance repairs.
Resident Advisor De artment of Residence Life. Performed the duties of processing applications for campus housing.. Advised applicants on available housing options.
Research Assistant Department of Ps cholo (Student).
Assisted in the data collection and analysis for a study con-cerning the use of convex mirror traffic.
September 1977- UNEMPLOYED (Undergraduate at North Carolina State Univer-3uly 1979 sity).
3une 1977- SILER CITY, NORTH CAROLINA August 1977 Assistant Probation Worker - Assisted the Staff Psychologist at the North Carolina Correctional Center for Women on a project to determine personality and demographic factors in female prisoner escape behavior.
September 1976- ROBBINS-GHANT CORPORATION May 1977 Siler City, North Carolina Textile Worker. Trainee in the retail fabrics manufacturing department.
APPENDIX B HUMAN FACTORS/OPERATIONS SUPPORT GROUP RESUMES
THOMAS B. MALONE EDUCATION:
1964 Ph.D. - Experimental Psychology, Fordham University 1962 M.A. - Experimental Psychology, Fordham University 1958 B.S. - Experimental Psychology, St. 3oseph's College EXPERIENCE:
February 1971 ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Senior Vice President and Technical Director - Behavioral Sciences Division - Responsible for the direction of programs in the Behavioral Sciences Division, including the areas of Human Factors Engineering; Human Resources Development; Human Performance Research, Test and Evaluation; Crew. Systems Development; Space Systems; Training RRD; and Human Factors for Energy Systems.
Responsible Officer for a study to develop human factors engineering guidelines for the nuclear power industry, for the NRC, 1980.
Responsible Officer for a program to provide human factors test and evaluation support to the Army Aviation Test Center, Ft.
Rucker, Alabama, 1979-1980.
Program Manager for a study of the role of human factors engineering in the accident at Three Mile Island, for the NRC under Contract No. 04-79-209, 1979.
Program Manager for an effort to apply human factors engi-neering to the LSD-01 ship and land based test site, for Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company, 1979-1980.
Program Manager for a continuing program to assess and apply human factors engineering technology to the design of surface ships and ship systems for the Naval Sea Systems Command, Contract N00020-76-C-6129, April 1976-1980.
Principle Investigator for an effort to assess and apply Human Factors Engineering Technology to Major Weapon Systems, for the Naval Air Development Center and Naval Sea Systems Command, Contract N00020-76-C-6129, 3uly 1979.
Principal Investigator for Development of Human Engineering Criteria for Modern Control/Display Components and Standard
Parts, Human Engineering Laboratory, U.S. Army Missile RRD Command Detachment, Contract DAAK00-79-C-0100, May 1979.
Responsible Officer for a program to provide human factors test and evaluation support to missile systems, at the Army White Sands Missile Range, Contract DAAD07-79-C-0063, April 1979.
Responsible Officer for a human factors test and evaluation program for Army Command, Control and Communications Systems, U.S. Army Electronic Proving Ground, Ft. Huachuca, Arizona, Contract DAEA18-79-C-0029, February 1979.
Principal Investigator for an effort to apply human engineering concepts and criteria to the design of Naval air systems, Naval Air Development Center, N62269-79-C-0029, February 1979.
Program Manager for Development of Methods for Measuring and assessing human performance reliability of Army Systems during DTRE. U.S. Army, TECOM DAAKN-78-C-0079, October 1978.
Program Manager of a study to apply HFE technology to the Mark-10 Arresting Gear System for Naval Sea Systems Command, Contract N00020-76-C-6129, October 1978.
Program Manager for the Application of HFE Technology to the Mark-13 Catapult System, Navy Air Systems Command, Contract N00020-C-6129, October 1978.
Principal Investigator for an effort for NASA Life Sciences to establish procedures and criteria for selecting shuttle payloads and experiments, March 1978.
Program Manager of a study to apply human factors engineering technology to the Beartrap Helicopter Recovery Assist, Secure and Traverse System for Naval Sea Systems Command, Contract N00020-76-C-6129, january 1978.
Principal Investigator for a study of innovative methods for improving passenger car driver performance for DOT NHTSA, November 1977.
Principal Investigator for a research and development program for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
Cybernetics Technology Office, Contract MDA903-77-C-0355, October 1977.
Program Manager for Planning and Conduct of a Human Factors Evaluation of the Improved Hawk Missile System, Contract DAAD07-77-0059 for White Sands Missile Range, May 1977.
f Principal Investigator, Development of a Training Film for the Navy Human Factors Test and Evaluation Manual (HFTEMAN),
Contract N00123-77-C- 1000, April 1977.
Program Manager for Development of Test and Evaluation Procedures for Materiel Operated in Cold Regions, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, Contract DAAD05-77-C-0720, 3anuary 1977.
Program Manager for Development of a Course Curriculum for a Selected Maintenance Training Course, N61339-76-C-0128, Naval Training Equipment Center, 1976.
Program Manager for Conduct of a Survey of Power Mower Warning Labels, Consumer Product Safety Commission, CPSC76210900, 1976.
Program Manager for an Effort to Develop Consolidated Human Factors Test and Evaluation Procedures for the Arm Test and Evaluation Command, DAAD05-76-C-0787, October 1976.
Program Manager for the Analysis of Human Factors Require-ments and Development of Design Criteria for Remotely Con-trolled Vehicles, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, NAS8-31808, 1976.
Principal Investigator for a Program to Support the Cybernetics Technology Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Contract MDA903-75-C-0227, 1976-77.
Program Manager, Advance Concepts of Naval Marine Engi-neering Maintenance, Contract N61339-76-C-0015, for the Naval Training Equipment Center, 1976-1977.
Principal Investigator, Field Test Evaluations of Rear Lighting and Signaling Systems, Contract DOT-HS-5-01228, conducted for Department of Transportation, 1975-1977.
Principal Investigator, Identify, Evaluate and Improve On the 3ob Training Program for Navy Food Programs, Contract N00123-76-C-0186, for the Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, 1976.
Program Manager, Development of the Navy Human Factors Test and Evaluation Manual (HFTEMAN), Contract N 00123-75-C-1360, 1976.
Program Manager, Assessment of the Degree of Generalizability in Selected Advanced Maintenance Training Concepts,'ontract N61339-75-C-0097, for the Naval Training Equipment Center, 1975.
Program Manager, Development of Shuttle Payload EVA Requirements, Contract NAS8-31050, conducted for NASA MSFC, 1975.
Program Manager, Research and Development of an Engineering Training Management System, Contract N00200-75-M-AK25, for the Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, 1975.
Program Manager, Tug/SEPS/Free Flying Payloads Simulation Demonstration, Contract NAS8-31051, conducted for NASA MSFC, 1975.
Program Manager of a study to develop advanced techniques of shuttle and spacelab man-machine interface evaluation, for NASA HQ, Contract NASW-2707, 1975.
Principal Investigator for a research study of the role of alcohol in non-fatal motor vehicle accidents involving injury, for DOT NHTSA, Contract No. DOT-HS-0-00950, 1975.
Principal Investigator for an effort to develop and evaluate advanced instructional technology concepts for marine engi-neering maintenance training, for the Navy Training Equipment Center, Contract No. N61339-70-C-0151, 1975.
Program Manager of a study to develop techniques for defining experimenter requirements for Spacelab payloads using network modeling approaches, for NASA MSFC, 1975.
Program Manager for a study to identify roles of EVA and remote manipulator systems for space shuttle and shuttle pay-load support missions, for NASA 3SC, 1970.
Program Manager for development of a human engineering data guide for evaluation (HEDGE), for the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, 1970.
Program Manager for a man-machine evaluation of the M60A2 tank system, Modern Army Special Systems Test Evaluation and Review (MASSTER) and Army Research Institute (ARI), 1979.
Program Manager for an effort at NASA MSFC concerned with planning and conducting man-systems simulation studies to support earth orbital teleoperator systems technology develop-ment; supervision of a team of scientists performing man-system simulation evaluations programs, 1972-70.
Program Manager for a contract with DOT NHTSA to develop standardized control/display location, operation, and coding criteria for cars, buses and trucks, 1973.
Responsible for specifying system requirements and development planning for the National Information System to Psychology, for the American Psychological Association, 1971.
Developed shuttle and sortie lab mission support requirements to support the definition of a Free Flying Teleoperator Flight Experiment Definition, for Bell Aerospace, 1973.
Developed guidelines and decision criteria for determining the role of man in shuttle and sortie lab missions, for NASA HQ, 1972-1973.
Identified specific applications of space teleoperator technology to problems in the medical areas of prosthetics, orthotics, and sensory aids, for NASHA HQ, 1973.
Served on a special NASA task team to investigate technology requirements for shuttle teleoperator retrieval of payloads-responsible for the man-machine interface requirements, 1972.
Served as a special consultant to the NASA Sortie Lab Life Sciences Payload Planning Panel, for human performance evaluation, teleoperators and EVA, 1973.
Presentation of technical papers on teleoperator and EVA for the First National Teleoperator Conference (1972), 'ystems the AAAS Symposium on Shuttle Payloads (1972), the IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Manual Control (1973), Robot and Manipulator Symposium, Udine, Italy (1973), Naval Mainte-nance Conf erence (1975), Maintenance Training Conf erence (1975), Annual Meetings of the Human Factors Society (1973-1975), Congress of the IEA (1976), and to various technical meetings at NASA HQ, NASA MSFC, DOT NHTSA, NTEC, and Army TECOM.
Served as the Technical Program Chairman for the 1973 Human Factors Annual Meeting, and Chairman of the Technical Sessions Subcommittee for the 1976 International Ergonomics Association Congress.
November 1965 URS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Matrix Research Division February 1971 (Formerly MATRIX CORPORATION)
Falls Church, Virginia Vice President and Director, Human Factors Branch - Developed t e NA A Human Factors Researc and Advanced Development Program for teleoperator systems.
Development of requirements for head-up displays for Civil Aircraft'Applications.
Developed an Integrated Pedestrian System in Denville, New 3ersey.
Managed an operating division engaged in man/systems analysis and integration and Human Performance Research.
Leader of a team of scientists for defining requirements for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory Mission Control Center.
Supervised the design and testing of control consoles for high performance aircraft radar homing and warning systems.
Participated in the analysis and design of advanced shipboard electronic warfare systems (SHORTSTOP).
Evaluated human factors design techniques for Naval weapons system design.
Managed the Matrix effort concerned with developing design requirements for the Apollo Telescope Mount.
Determined human performance problems for oil operations on the North Slope of Alaska.
Analysis of astronaut capability on the lunar surface.
Developed design requirements for lunar shelter habitability.
Determined effects of noise and vibration on helicopter pilots.
Determined pedestrian safety requirements and design criteria.
Developed design requirements for remote manipulator systems for aerospace applications.
Analyzed astronaut capability to perf orm extravehicular activity.
Managed a team of human factors specialists concerned with analysis and design of a command/control center for a classified remotely controlled intelligence surveillance system.
3uly 1963 GRUMMAN AEROSPACE November 1965 Long Island, New York Head Crew S stems Simulation Group - Managed and conducted computer base simulation studies of lunar module rendezvous, docking, landing, powered descent and abort.
PUBLICATIONS:
Books:
Malone, T.B. (Editor). Proceedin s of the 6th Con ress of the International Er onomics Association, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. 1976.
Malone, T.B. and Rane, M. (Editors). Proceedin s of the 17th Annual Meetin of the Human Factors Societ, Washington, D.C. 1973.
Perkins, 3.C., Maxey, G.C., (TECOM); Malone, T.B., Shenk, S.W., and Kirkpatrick, M. (Essex Corporation). Human Factors En ineerin: Part I - Test Procedures: Part II - HEDGE. TECOM TOP 1-2-610, 20 December 1977.
Malone, T.B., and Shenk, S.W. Cold Re ions Human Factors En ineerin: Part I - Test Procedures; Part II - HEDGE. TECOM TOP 1-2-611. Prepared under contract DAAD07-77-C0720, 20 3anuary 1978.
Malone, T.B. and Shenk, S.W. Human Factors Test and Evaluation Manual (HFTEMAN): Volume 1 Data Guide Volume 2 Su ort Data Volume 3 Methods and Procedures. Prepared under contract N00123-75-C-1360, for the Navy's Pacific Missile Test Center, 1976.
Published Articles:
Malone, T.B. and Mallory, K.M., 3r. "Deficiencies in Human Engineering Contri-buted to the TMI Experience." Proceedings of the NRC/IEEE Conference on Advanced Electrotechnology Applications to Nuclear Plants, Washington, D.C., 3anuary 1980.
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., Mallory, K.M., 3r., Eike, D., 3ohnson, 3., and Walker, R. "Human Factors Evaluation of Control Room Design and Operator Performance at TMI." NUREG CR-1270, The Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion, January 1980.
Baker, C.C., 3ohnson, 3.H., Malone, M.T., and Malone, T.B., "Identification of HFE Technology Gaps in Addressing HFE Requirements of the Navy Systems Acquisition Process," Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Boston, Massachusetts, 1979.
Malone, T.B. "Research and Development Program Plan, Human Factors Engi-neering Technology for Surface Ships," Naval Sea Systems Command, 3uly 1979.
Malone, T.B., Eike, D.R., Baker, C., and Andrews, P.3. "Human Factors Engineering Technology Integration into the Naval Ship Acquisition Process:
Designing for Operability," Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Detroit, Michigan, 1978.
'I Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., Malone, T.B., Brye, R., and Fredrick, P.N.
"Manipulator System Performance Measurements." Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1977 Vol. 12, pp. 439-450.
Malone, T.B., Andrews, P.3., Lewis, W., and McGuinness, 3. "Human Factors Engineering Technology Integration into the Naval Ship Acquisition Process."
Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, San Francisco, CA, 1977.
Kohl, 3.S., Malone, T.B., and Chernikoff, R. "Field Testing of Alternate Vehicle Rear Lighting Configurations." Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, San Francisco, CA, 1977.
Malone, T.B., Delong, 3., and Farris, R. "Survey, Evaluation and Design of On-the-3ob Training for the Mess Management Specialist Afloat." Naval Personnel Research and Development Center NPRDC SR 77-3, 3anuary 1977.
Shields, N.L., Kirkpatrick, M. and Malone, T.B. "Manipulator Evaluation Criteria."
Proceedin s of the 6th Con ress of the International Er onomics Association, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. 1976.
Malone, T.B., Delong, 3., Farris, R., and Krumm, R.L. "Advanced concepts of Naval engineering maintenance training." NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 74-C-0151, 1976.
Malone, T.B., and Shenk, S.W. "The Navy's Human Factors Test and Evaluation Manual, HFTEMAN." Proceedin s of the 6th Con ress of the International Er onomics Association, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 1976.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., and Malone, T.B. "A Method and Data for Video Monitor Sizing." Proceedin s of the International Er onomics Association, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 1976.
Shields, N.L., Malone, T.B., and Kirkpatrick, M. "Manipulator System Performance Evaluation: Some Problems and Approaches.'" Paper presented to the National Bureau of Standards workshop on performance evaluation of programmable robots and manipulators, Annapolis, MD, October 1975.
Shields, N.L., Kirkpatrick, M., and Malone, T.B., and Huggins, C.T. "Design Parameters for a Stereoptic Teleoperator System Based on Direct Vision Depth Perception Cues." Paper presented to the 19th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Dallas, TX, October 1975.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., Malone, T.B., Fredrick, P.N., and Brye, R.G.
"Manipulator System Performance Measurement." Paper presented to the Second Conference on Remotely Manned Systems, 3uly 1975.
Malone, T.B. "Technological Mixes vs. Other Means of Fully Generalized Mainte-nance Training. Presented at the Naval Maintenance Conference; Orlando, FL, 3une 1975.
Malone, T.B. "Requirements and Concepts for Fully Generalized Maintenance Training Systems. Paper presented at the Naval Personnel and Development Center, August 1975.
Malone, T.B., Shields, N.L., Kirkpatrick, M., and Huggins, C.T. "Optical Range and Range Rate Estimation for Teleoperator Systems." Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Huntsville, AL, October 1970.
Malone, T.B. and Janow, C. "Human Factor Roles in Design of Teleoperator Systems." Paper presented at the 17th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Washington, D.C., October 1973.
Malone, T.B. and Deutsch, S. "The Applications of the Remote Control of the Manipulator in Manned Space Exploration." Paper presented at the Robot and Manipulator Symposium (ROMANSY, '73), Udine, Italy, September 1973.
Malone, T.B. "Teleoperators and EVA for Shuttle Missions." Paper presented to the AAAS and ASA Conference on Shuttle Payloads, Washington, D.C.,
December 1972.
Malone, T.B. "Man-machine Interface for Controllers and End Effectors. Paper presented at the First Nytional Conference on Teleoperators, Pasadena, CA, September 1972.
Malone, T.B. "Evaluation of Human Operator Visual Performance Capability for Teleoperator Missions." Paper presented at the First National Conference on Teleoperators, Pasadena, CA, September 1972.
Technical Re orts:
"'-" "'e.
Malone, T.B. Human Factors En ineerin 1980.
Pro ram Plan and S ecification for the Malone', T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., Mallory, K.M., Eike, D.R., 3ohnson, 3.H., and Walker, R.W. Human Factors Evaluation of Control Room Desi n and 0 erator Performance at Three Mile Island. Final report under Contract NRC-00-79-209, December 1979.
Baker, C., Johnson, 3., Malone, M., and Malone, T.B. Human Factors En ineerin for Nav Ma'or Weapon S stem Ac uisition. Naval Air Development Center and Naval Sea Systems Command, 3uly 1979.
Baker, C., Kosmela, T., and Malone, T.B. Mannin Re uirements Estimation for Mark 86/SEAFIRE Gunfire Control S stem Inte ration. Naval Sea Systems Command, May 1979.
Baker, C., and Malone, T.B. Human Factors En ineerin Evaluation of Catapult
~Sstems. Naval Sea Systems omman eport un er ontract C-6129, November 1978.
Malone, T.B. and Eike, D.R. Human Factors En ineerin Technolo A lied to the Beartra Recover Assist Secure and Traverse RAST S stem LSO Console
~Desi n. Final Report under Contract N00020-76-C-6129, 2une l 978.
Bayol, M.E. and Malone, T.B. Naval Electronic S stems Command De artment Control Point 3oint Electronics T e Desi nation S stem Nomenclature Action Re uest Processin Course. Final Report under Contract N00600-76-D-1687, April 1978.
Malone, T.B. and Baker, C.C. Human Factors En ineerin Technolo for the Mark-10 Arrestin Gear. Final Report under Contract N00020-76-C-61299 March 1978.
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., Kohl, 3.S., and Baker, C.C. Field Test Evaluation of Rear Li htin S stems. Final Report under Contract DOT-HS-5-01228, February 1978.
Malone, T.B., Kohl, 3.S., Eike, D.R., and Shields, N.L. Human Factors En ineerin Evaluation of the Im roved HAWK with Product Im rovements. Final Report under Contract DAAD07-C-0092, August 1977.
Farris, Rep Malone, T.B., and Kirkpatrick, M. Com arison of Alcohol Involvement in Ex osed and In ured, Drivers. Final report under Contract DOT-HS-0-009509 May 1977.
Malone, T.B., and Kohl, 3.S. Field Test of Tail Li ht Confi urations. Midterm report under Contract DOT-HS-5-01228, February 1977.
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., McGuinness, 3., and Kohl, 3.S. Human Factors En ineerin Technolo for Shi Ac uisition. Final report under Contract N00020-76-C-61299 Naval Sea Systems Command, October 1976.
McGuinness, 3., and Malone, T.B. Consumer Surve for Power Mower Hazard Warnin Labels and Power Mower Noise. Under Contract CPSC 76210900 for the Consumer Product Safety Commission, October 1976.
Malone, T.B. Nav Sea S stems Command Pro ram Mana ement Course Curriculum. Under Contract N00000-76-M-62039 October 1976.
Malone, T.B., Delong, 3., and Farris, R. Advanced Conce ts of Naval En ineerin Maintenance Trainin . Final report prepared for the Naval Training Equipment Center, under Contract N61339-70-C-01519 August 15, 1975.
Kirkpatrick, M., and Malone, T.B. Role of Man in Fli ht Ex riment Pa loads-Phase II. Final report on Contract con ucte or!
3uly 1975.
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, Mep and Miccocci, A- Develo ment and Validation of Methods for Man-Machine Interface Evaluation. Final report on Contract NASW-27079 March 109 1975.
Malone, T.B., and Micocci, A. Stud of Roles of Remote Mani ulator S stems and EVA for Shuttle Mission Su ort. Final report on Contract NAS9-13710 for NASA 3ohnson Space Center, October 1970.
Malone, T.B., and Kirkpatrick, M. Role of Man in Fli ht Ex eriment Pa loads-Phase I. Final report prepared for NASA MSFC on Contract NAS8-29917, 3uly 1970.
Kirkpatrick, M., Brye, R., and Malone, T.B. Man-S stems Evaluation of Movin Base Vehicle Simulation Motion Cues. Final report prepared for NASA MSFC on Contract NAS8-29910, April 1970.
Malone, T.B., Shenk, S.W., Weiss, E.C. Human Factors En ineerin Data Guide for Evaluation (HEDGE) and Guidebook Supplement. Prepared under Contract DAAD05-73-0388 for the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, March 1970.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., and Malone, T.B. Earth Orbital Teleo erator S stem Man-Machine Interface Evaluation. Final report prepared for NASA MSFC on Contract NAS8-28298, 3anuary 1970.
Malone, T.B., and Kirkpatrick, M. The Role of Man in Fli ht Experiment Pa load Missions. Final report prepared for NASA MSFC on Contract NASW-2389, August 1973.
Malone, T.B., Shields, N.L., and Kirkpatrick, M. Re rt on Earth Orbital Teleo erator Visual S stem Evaluation Pro ram. NASA MSFC, December 1972.
Malone, T.B. Free Fl in Teleoperator Mission kAnal sis. Report for NASA MSFC, December 1972.
Malone, T.B., Krumm, R., Kao, H., and Shenk, S. Human Factors Criteria for Vehicle Controls and Dis la s. Final report for the Department of Transpor-tation un er Contract DO -HS-120-1-17', August 1972.
Malone, T.B. Teleo erator Man-Machine Interface Re uirements and Conce ts for Satellite etrieva an ervicin . Fina report on Contract NAS -2220, Duly 1972.
Malone, T.B. Teleoperator S stems Human Factors Pro ram. Prepared for NASA, OART HQ, 3anuary 1971.
Malone, T.B., Schowalter, D. and Schweikert, G. Develo ment of an Inte rated Pedestrian S stem for New 3erse Route 06. Prepared for Madigan-Hyland, Long Island City, NY, April 1970.
Malone, T.B., Mallory, K., and Sanger, E. Selection of S stems to Perform Extravehicular Activit - Man and Manipulator. Report prepared for NASA, un er Contract NA -20380, March 1970.
Schowalter, D., Malone, T.B., and Shenk, S.W. Lunar Habitability S stem Desi n.
Report prepared for NASA, Contract NASW-19iil, March 1970.
Maloney T B y Bender, H., and Kahn, M. Anal sis of Astronaut Performance in the Lunar Environment. Report prepared for NASA, Contract NASW-1751, May 1969.
Malone, T.B., Eberhardt, P., and Gloss, D. Human Factors Techni ues Em lo ed in Derivin Personnel Re uirements in Weapon S stem Develo ment. Bureau of Naval Personnel, report PRR-68-3, October 1967.
Malone, T.B., and Tostan, D. Effects of Noise and Vibration on Commercial Helicopter Pilots. Report prepared for NASA, contract NASW-1829, April 1970.
Malone, T.B. A olio 1 Telesco e Mount Pro ram Simulation Plan. Submitted to Brown Engineering Company, Huntsville, AL, May 1967.
Malone, T.B., Tostan, D., and Witas, C. Re ort on Radar Homin and Warnin E ui ment Desi n Criteria. Prepared for ATI, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, May 1966.
Malone, T.B. Manned Orbitin Laborator Mission Control Center Desi n Guide-lines. Prepared for Douglas Aircraft Company, May 1966.
Malone, T.B.
Lunar Module Simulation Requirements
~
A Series of Simulation Malone, T.B. Stimulus and Observer Variables in the Perce tion of the Ames Tra ezoid Illusion. Ph.D. dissertation conducted for United States Navy Training Device Center, 1960.
Malone, T.B. Effect of Stimulus Wavelen th on the Area-Intensit Visual Absolute Threshold Function. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Fordham University, 1962.
KENNETH M. MALLORY,3R.
EDUCATION:
M.S. - Experimental Psychology, Tufts University B.S. - Experimental Psychology and Mathematics, Lynchburg College Intensive course in computer programming and analysis (Assembly language and FORTRAN)
EXPERIENCE:
September 1978- ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Director Essex Ener Pro rams - Plan and manage Essex pro]ects acme at t e esign evelopment, test and evaluation of control rooms for nuclear power plants, and projects to develop standards and criteria for control room man/system interfaces.
Directed an assessment of management factors involved in the design and operation of TMI-2.
Staff Scientist - Human Factors Engineering planning and management. Responsible for the design and development of procedures and documentation; for evaluation and specification of spacecraft habitability; and for operator integration into complex man/computer systems.
3uly 1970- KENNETH MALLORYAND ASSOCIATES, INC.
September 1978 President - Worked on documentation and program planning/
implementation activities Procedures and Prepared user documentation to support NASA's Life Sciences Documentation program. Included were TECHNICAL AND PLANNING GUIDES used by several thousand life scientists; experiment procurement documents; 3OB PERFORMANCE AIDS (3PAs) used to operate Life Sciences data retrieval systems; QUESTIONNAIRES sent to scientists and used by NASA to plan its Life Sciences Program; QUESTIONNAIRES used to collect data on Flight Experiment hardware and vehicle requirements, NEWSLETTER reports published periodically to inform the Life Sciences community on the status of NASA's Life Sciences Program.
Also developed a two volume, fully human engineered QUESTIONNAIRE for General Dynamics/Convair. This question-naire collected information on engineering requirements for the Space Shuttle and Spacelab.
Developed a set of HUMAN ENGINEERING GUIDELINES for documentation design, based on a thorough search of relevant literature.
Developed and automated a 2000-citation Life Sciences BIBLIOGRAPHY cross-referenced and printed in 88 discipline categories. Report format was human engineered.
Program Designed, specified, tested and used procedures and SOFTWARE Planning to evaluate the suggestions made by several thousand scientists concerning the objectives and implementation of NASA's Life Science Program.
Developed a Monte Carlo MODEL for optimizing the assignment of experiments to several Shuttle/Spacelab missions.
Designed, specified, tested and used SOFTWARE to synthesize free-form text descriptions of 2500 suggested experiment objectives into 27 scientific objectives.
Developed MANAGEMENT PLANS for the Life Sciences Flight tifiedd.
Experiment Program. Plans covered all phases (planning to post-flight) and all three Life Sciences centers and headquarters; responsibilities were allocated to activities; preliminary schedules were outlined; documentation requirements were iden-Hardware Assisted NASA/Headquarters personnel in a critical evaluation of HUMAN ENGINEERING STANDARDS to be applied to manned spacecraft and ground equipment design.
Designed, developed and fabricated a voice recorder CONTROL PANEL for use by a QUADRAPLEGIC. Project involved a complete static/dynamic anthropometric work-up, selection of control surfaces and selection of off-the-shelf hardware that could be operated by chin or shoulder.
May 1967- URS/MATRIX CO.
July 1970 President (1971-1970)
Director Huntsville Division (1967-1968, 1969-1971)
Staff Scientist (1968-1969)
Procedures and Directed the development of CREW PROCEDURES and JOB Documentation PERFORMANCE AIDS for operation of Skylab's solar observ-atory.
Directed the development of PROCEDURES and JOB PERFORMANCE AIDS for Skylab EVA operations.
Participated in the development of NASA HUMAN ENGI-NEERING STANDARDS.
Developed a USER-ORIENTED PROCEDURE for selecting optimum extravehicular systems for spacecraft.
Systems Applied modified DELPHI TECHNIQUE in the selection of the Development final configuration of Skylab's Apollo telescope Mount Control Console.
Participated in design of SIMULATOR for training of MOTOR-CYCLE OPERATIONS.
Managed design of CREW STATION for manned remote manipu-lator system.
Participated in the design and managed the development of a 6 d.f. HANDCONTROLLER suitable for a variety of manual con-trol applications.
Participated in design of general purpose EVA WORKSTATION for the Shuttle space vehicle.
Managed the man/systems design and CREW FAMILIARIZATION of Skylab's Apollo Telescope Mount Control Panel.
Designed and managed design activities on several Skylab EVA WORKSITES.
Developed MODELS for semi-automatic reduction of video tape data on human performance and reliability.
System Testing Developed and managed implementation of technique for IDEN-and Evaluation TIFYING CONTROL PANEL DESIGN DEFICIENCIES through analysis of operational telemetry data.
Participated in and directed development of DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE to locate man/equipment interface deficiencies.
Planned and directed FUNCTIONAL AND TASK ANALYSES on spacecraft man-in-the-loop control system. Verification of design through computer-based visual/kinematic and zero-gravity simulation.
Performed data reduction and STATISTICAL ANALYSES on man-in-the-loop simulation results.
Developed flight experiments, using noninterference testing techniques, to QUANTIFY CREW WORK PERFORMANCE in zero and partial gravity environments.
Developed TAXONOMY for relating human performance to tasks and task environments.
Participated as EXPERIMENTER and TEST MONITOR in human performance tests in the hardware development phase of the Skylab Program.
Designed and managed development of an automatic in-vehicle system to COLLECT VIDEO DATA ON DRIVER PERFORM-ANCE and the causes of traffic accidents.
Participated in design and managed developmental testing of a complete video system for the collection of IN-SITU HUMAN PERFORMANCE data (SPACELAB).
Managed the design of a full-scale simulation of Skylab extrave-hicular solar environment. Later used simulator to EVALUATE EQUIPMENT DESIGN and verify procedures.
Design neutral buoyancy simulation of intravehicular cargo transfer on Skylab. Results closely approximated transit~times and rates on board the spacecraft.
Safety Developed and implemented program to provide OCCU-PATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH SURVEYS to small business enterprises.
P rovided Occupational Saf ety and Health CONSULTING SERVICES to architectural and engineering activities.
Developed a comprehensive SAFETY AND HEALTH LIBRARY with associated information retrieval system.
Managed program to MINIMIZE HAZARDS in Skylab extrave-hicular activities.
Implemented program for TRAINING ENGINEERS in occu-
'ational safety and health.
Performed an analysis of the EFFECTIVENESS of the Occu-pational Safety and Health Administration through April 1970.
Program Planning Participated in the application of a LATTICE TECHNIQUE to the development of research objectives for NASA's Office of Life Sciences.
Participated with ARE firms in the application of human and system engineering techniques to HEALTH CARE facility master planning.
Participated in the development of a MODEL to assess the costs of including EVA on Space Shuttle missions.
Managed effort to DEFINE THE SKILLS which must be provided by crews of future space vehicles.
Participated with ARE firms to INTEGRATE HUMAN ENGI-NEERING into planning and design.
June 1965- GENERAL DYNAMICS/ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION May 1967 and DISPLAY INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES to be used in submarine control systems having ten years'ead time.
Proposed and developed prototype of a REAL-TIME MAN/
COMPUTER INDUCTIVE REASONING SYSTEM for use in submarine attack control systems.
Designed and monitored development of 3-D TV SYSTEM for use with underwater remote manipulators.
Provided MATHEMATICS SUPPORT to submarine training simu-lator development (analog computer).
Participated in series of experiments on DECISION MAKING STRATEGIES in anti-submarine warfare.
March 1963- AVCO/RAD June 1965 Human En ineer - Designed and verified an automated (fault tree method for ASSIGNING RELIABILITYREQUIREMENTS TO HUMAN OPERATORS in re-entry vehicle systems.
Participated in the implementation of a HUMAN ERROR REDUCTION PROGRAM for re-entry vehicle assembly, mainte-nance and test operations.
C Designed a series of experiments aimed at QUANTIFYING HUMAN RELIABILITY,including: readying the connector pins; mating of connectors in close quarters; digital to binary trans-lation; localization of a low-light-level beacon.
Participated in evaluation and re-design of GROUND TEST EQUIPMENT (large scale and multi-man).
Evaluated use of switch setting checks as a means to IMPROVE HUMAN RELIABILITY.
August 1962- PHILCO CO.
March 1963 Com uter Pro rammer/Anal st - Developed computer programs Assembly language for the STATISTICAL REDUCTION of SAGE radar data.
Designed and programmed a DIGITAL SIMULATION of a biological organism responding to the hunger drive.
PUBLICATIONS dc PRESENTATIONS "Human Factors Evaluation of Control Room Design and Operator Performance at Three Mile Island." NRC-00-79-209, December 1979. Co-authored by Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., Eike, D.R., 3ohnson, 3.H., and Walker, R.W.
"Life Sciences Status Report - No. 8." To NASA/Headquarters, Washington, D.C.,
3uly 1979.
"Program Requirements Document - Organization and Management of the (NASA)
Life Sciences Flight Experiments Program." (Draft). To NASA/
Headquarters, Washington, D.C., October 1978.
"Specialized Life Sciences Bibliographies." Fifteen reports prepared for NASA/
Headquarters, Washington, D.C., 3uly 1978.
"Life Sciences in the Shuttle Era." 78-ENAs-30 Co-authored with Dr. Stanley Deutsch/NASA, 1978.
"Space Shuttle Payload Requirements Questionnaire." (Draft) Vol. 1 2 2. To General Dynamics/Convair, San Diego, CA, February 1978.
"Life Sciences Guide to Space Shuttle and Spacelab." (Draf t). To NASA/
Headquarters, Washington, D.C., March 1977.
"Fact Sheet for Proposed Life Sciences Flight Experiments." (Draf t). To NASA/Headquarters, Washington, D.C., March 1978.
"Guide to the Preparation of Life Sciences Flight Experiment Proposals." (Draft).
To NASA/Headquarters, Washington, D.C., March 1978.
"Planning for Life Sciences Research in Space." 76-ENAs-52 Co-authored with Dr.
Stanley Deutsch/NASA.
"An Operations Research Approach to Assigning Flight Experiments to Life Sciences Missions." To NASA/Headquarters, Washington, D.C., 3uly 1976.
"Achievements and Forecasts for Human Factors in Manned Spacef light." 1975 Human Factors Annual Meeting. Co-authored with Dr. Stanley Deutsch/
NASA.
"OSHA - Will it Work?", presentation to New York Academy of Sciences, New York, April 10, 1970.
"The Role of the Human Factors Company in Consumer Product Safety" workshop at the 17th annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, October 16-18, 1973.
"An Artificial Gravity Performance Assessment Experiment," presentation to AIAA Weightlessness and Artificial Gravity Meeting, Williamsburg, VA, August 9-11, 1971.
Selection of Systems to Perform Extravehicular Activity, Final Report on Contract NAS8-20830, April 27, 1970.
Application of Teleoperators to EVA Tasks, Honorarium at the University of Michigan, October 1970.
"Man vs. Manipulator," presentation given to NASA Committee on EVA, Washington, D.C., April 1970.
Serpentine Actuator Man/System Feasibility Analysis Report, Technical Report to Brown Engineering Co., November 1967.
Man/Systems Feasibility of Using the Serpentine Actuator in AAP-O, Final Report, task under NAS8-20073, December 1967.
"Concept Identification - A Critical Comparison of Rote Learning and Inductive Reasoning," presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, March 1967.
Apollo Telescope Mount Dynamic Crew Procedures Demonstration, NASA MSFC Report 10M33202, September 1968.
Controller Comparison for the ATM Experiment Pointing Control System, NASA MSFC Report 10M33209, 3uly 1968.
Automated Link Analysis Model, Technical Report to Brown Engineering (under NAS8-20073), 3anuary 1968.
A Submarine Tactics Evaluation System, Technical Report, General Dynamics Corporation, March 1967.
Description of a Real-Time Statistical Technique to Determine Level of Training, Technical Report to Brown Engineering (under NAS8-20073), October 1967.
The Integration of Two Non-Metric Scaling Techniques, Technical Report, Tufts University, February 1967.
A Fault Tree Technique for Assigning Reliability Requirements to Operator Tasks, Technical Report, AVCO Corporation, August 1965.
An Experimental Assessment of Illumination Requirements for Human Operator Detection of a Blinking Light in a Low Light Level Environment, Technical Report, AVCO Corporation, February 1965.
"Experimental Comparison of Connector Coding Techniques", paper presented to Air Force Conference on Electrical Connectors, Los Angeles, California, May 1960.
"Human Operator Connector Torqueing Capabilities", paper presented to Air Force Conference on Electrical Connectors, Los Angeles, California, May 1960.
MARK KIRKPATRICK III EDUCATION:
1971 Ph.D. - Experimental Psychology, The Ohio State University 197 M.A. - Engineering Psychology, IThe Ohio State University 1965 B.A. - Psychology, The Ohio State University EXPERIENCE:
3anuary 1977 ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Vice President and Technical Director - Responsible for project management of efforts performed under contracts to NRC, NASA, and DOT. Responsible for technical support and periodic review of all human factors engineering projects concerned with nuclear power generation.
3uly 1972 ESSEX CORPORATION 3anuary 1977 Huntsville, Alabama, Facility Director of Huntsville 0 erations - Responsible for directing and coordinating research and development performed by the Huntsville staff.
Conducted laboratory and simulation studies of operator performance in earth orbital teleoperator mission tasks. These studies have encompassed all elements of the teleoperator system including visual, mobility, and manipulator subsystems.
Study approaches have included analysis, laboratory test, and complete man-in-the-loop simulation. Responsibilities included experimental design, test conduct, data analysis, and report writing.
Conducted a study of monitor sizing requirements for the Shuttle, aft-cabin CRT displays based on operator perceptual capa-bilities, video system parameters, and viewing requirements.
Conducted a study to develop methodology for trade-offs and analysis in the area of crew time, loading, and skills in Spacelab experiments. This effort included development 'of a data form for Spacelab experiment functional requirements and use of a monte-carlo simulation program to exercise experiment task networks.
Performed an empirical study of human acceleration thresholds during complex vehicle simulation. These data were collected to provide parametric information on acceleration sensitivity so
that motion washout techniques could be used to enhance simu-lator validity.
Participated in a study of Shuttle EVA requirements and hazards.
Developed EVA approaches based on past EVA operations during manned space missions.
Participated in a study of man-machine integration requirements for TUG/SEPS/IUS. Responsibilities included development of control/display requirements and development of test plans and procedures for TUG/IUS simulations.
Participated as statistician in a variety of studies conducted by Essex Corporation. Responsible for statistical analysis of variance and multiple regression. Has generally advised Essex personnel in matters of data recording, analysis approach, and analysis procedures as applied to a wide range of projects.
Responsible for general direction of research performed by the Huntsville office including project planning, technical approach, data collection, data analysis, report writing, marketing, and proposal writing.
December 1967 THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAIN HUNTSVILLE September 1972 Huntsville, Alabama Instructor - Teaching responsibilities have included courses in sensation and perception, statistical analysis and organizational behavior at both the undergraduate and graduate levels.
December 1967 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL 3uly 1972 Columbus, Ohio Member of the Technical Staff - Participated in simulation programs involving air-to-ground E/0 guided missile systems.
Also involved in studies of driver behavior and effects of innovative route guidance systems using an automobile simu-lation technique. Responsibilities on these projects included planning, experimental design, development of mathematical models of human performance, statistical analysis of data, and report writing. Other activities included development of a stochastic model of visual search behavior and acting as a consultant in statistics and experimental design for various engineering groups at the Missiles Division of Rockwell International.
September 1966 HUMAN PERFORMANCE CENTER OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY December 1967 Columbus, Ohio Research Assistant - Conducted research on human factors in reconnaissance imagery interpretation.
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES R ACTIVITIES Human Factors Society Technical Program Chairman for the 1970 Annual Meeting President of Huntsville Chapter, 1975 Certified SCUBA Diver NAVI basic certification NASDS advanced open water certification PUBLICATIONS:
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., Mallory, K.M., Eike, D.R., 3ohnson, 3.H., and Walker, R.W. Human Factors. Evaluation of Control Room Desi n and 0 erator Performance at Three Mile Island. F>nal Report un er Contract NRC-00-79-209, December 1979.
~** '<<'. '*..>>.'.. *-- '.
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, Mep McQuinness9 3., and Kohl, 3.S. HFE Technolo October, 1976. '00020-76-C-61299 for Pruett, E.C., Dodson, D.W., and Kirkpatrick, M. Extravehicular Activit Desi n Guidelines and Criteria. Report Number 0-76-69 Essex Corporation, A exan r>ay >rginiay un er Contract NAS8-31050.
Malone, T.B., Pruett, E.Cog Dodson, D.Wag and Kirkpatrick, M. External 0 erations Maintenance and Re air (OMR) Mode Selection Criteria~eport Number 0-76-59 Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-31050, May, 1976.
Pruett, E.Ceg Kirkpatrick, M., Malone, T.B., and Shields, N.Leg 3r. Develo ment and Verification of Shuttle Pa load Extravehicular Activit (EVA Re uire-ments. Report Number e 76 e, -Ess-ex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-31O5a, March 1976.
Pruett, E.C., and Kirkpatrick, M. Tu /SEPS/Free-Fl in Pa loads Simulation Demonstrations. Phase I Report, Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-310519 3anuary 1976.
Kirkpatrick, Meg Shields, N.L., 3r., Malone, T.B., and Guerin, E.G. "A Method and Data for Video Monitor Sizing." Proceedin s of the Sixth Con ress of the International Er onomics Association, 3uly, 1976.
Shields, N.Leg Kirkpatrick, M., Malone, T.B., and Huggins, C. "Design Parameters for a Stereoptic Television System Based on Direct Vision Depth Perception Cues." Proceedin s of the Nineteenth Annual Meetin of the Human Factors S~ociet . Human Factors ociety, October, l 975.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., Brye, R.Geg and Vinz, F. "A Study of Mo'ving Base Simulation Motion Cues Utilizing Washout Technique." Proceedin s of the Nineteenth Annual Meetin of the Human Factors Society. Human Factors Society, October, 1975.
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., and Frederick, P.N. Role of Man in Fli ht Ex eriment Pa loads - Phase II. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia under Contract NAS8-30953, July, 1975.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., Malone, T.B., Frederick, P.N., and Brye, R.G.
"Manipulator System Performance Measurement." Paper presented to the Second Conference on Remotely Manned Systems, July, 1975.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., Malone, T.B. A Stud of Pa load S cialist Station Monitor Size Constraints. Report No. H 75-10. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-30505, February, 1975.
Shields, N.L., Kirkpatrick, M., Frederick, P.N., and Malone, T.B. Earth Orbital Teleo erator Visual S stem Evaluation Pro ram. Report No. 3. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-30505, February, 1975.
Shields) N L y Kirkpatrick, M., Malone, T.B. and Huggins, C.T. "Optical Range and Range Rate Estimation for Teleoperator Systems." Proceedin s of the Ei hteenth Annual Meetin of the Human Factors Societ . Human Factors Society, October, 1970.
Malone, T.B. and Kirkpatrick, M. Role of Man in Fli ht Ex eriment Pa loads Phase I. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-29917, July, 1970.
Kirkpatrick, M., and Brye, R.G. Man-S stems Evaluation of Movin Base Vehicle Simulation Motion Cue. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-29910, April, 1970.
Malone, T.B., Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., and Brye, R.G. Earth Orbital Teleo erator S stem Man-Machine Interface Evaluation. Report No. H-ii-l.
Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-28298, January, 1970.
Malone, T. B., Kirkpatrick, M., and Shields, N.L. Manipulator S stem Man-Machine Interface Evaluation Pro ram. Report No. H-0-3. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-28298, January, 1970.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., and Malone, T.B. Earth Orbital Teleo erator Visual S stem Evaluation Pro ram. Report No. H-0-2. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-28298, January, 1970.
Kirkpatrick, M., and Brye, R.G. Teleo erator Dockin Simulation. Report No.
H-0-0. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-28298, January, 1970.
Kirkpatrick, M., Shields, N.L., and Huggins, C. "Some Effects of Transmission Parameters on Detection and Recognition of Television Images," Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Societ . Human Factors Society, October, 1973.
Kirkpatrick, M., Malone, T.B., and Shields, N.L. Earth Orbital Teleo erator Visual S stem Evaluation Pro ram. Report I. Essex Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, under Contract NAS8-28298, March, 1973.
Breda, W.M., Kirkpatrick, M., and Shaf fer, C.L. A Stud of Route Guidance Technitiuea. NR72H-229, Rockwell International Corporation, September, 1972.
Kirkpatrick, M. "Measures of Automobile Simulator Validity." Paper presented at the Workshop on Human Factors in the Design and Operation of the Highway Transportation. Washington, D.C., 3anuary, 1972.
Kirkpatrick, M. Some Multi-State Models for Visual Search Performance.
Doctoral Dissertation. The Ohio State University, 3une, 1971.
Kirkpatrtick, M., Kopala, E.W., and Smith, R.H. Aided Tar et Ac uisition Performance Measurement Pro ram. NR71H-19, Rockwell International Corporation, March, 1971. (Confidential report, title unclassified).
Levy, G.W., Kirkpatrick, M., Shaf fer, C.L., and Breda, W.M. "Simulation Determination of Driver Information Lead Distance Requirements." Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Miami, Florida, September, 1970.
Kopala, E.W., Shaffer, C.L., and Kirkpatrick, M. A Stud of 0 erator/S stem Performance Usin a Helmet Ima in and Pointin stem to Direct a Television Seeker. NR70H-279, Rockwell International Corporation, August, 1970.
Shaf fer, C.L., Kirkpatrick, M., and Breda, W.M. A Drivin Simulation to Determine Information Lead Distance Re uirements for an Electronic Route 1970.
Levine,'.M., Kirkpatrick, M., and Shaf fer, C.L. Information Seekin with Conf lictin and Irrelevant In uts. NR69H-52, Roc well International Corporation, October, 1969.
Kirkpatrick, M. Develo ment and Evaluation of a Random Walk Model of Visual Search Behavior. NR69H-760, Rockwell International Corporation, December, 1968.
Breda, W.M., Shaffer, C.L. and Kirkpatrick, M. Tar et Ac uisition Stud for an Indirect Fire Point 0 tical Contrast Guidance S stem. NR68H-706, Rockwell International Corporation September, 1968 Confidential report, title unclassified).
Kirkpatrick, M. uantification of Sub'ective ualit and Com lex of Reconnaisance Ima er . M.A. esis, e 0 io tate University, December, 1967.
SECURITY CLEARANCE: SECRET (DISCO)
ROBERT G. KINKADE EDUCATION:
1960 Ph.D., Engineering Psychology, Ohio State University 1957 M.A., Experimental Psychology, University of Missouri 1955 B.A., Psychology, University of Missouri EXPERIENCE:
1976- Essex Corporation: .Duties are to: represent the Corporation in Present Instructional Technology matters, direct the San Diego Facility, manage programs, and contribute instructional psychology to projects. As a Vice President, is responsible for all financial, contractual, and administrative matters pertaining to the San Diego Facility. As Director of the San Diego Facility, is responsible for assigning the resources needed to achieve project objectives in an effective and efficient manner. As a Program Manager, is responsible for directing the development of a prototype Automatic Propulsion System On-Board Maintenance Training Program, consulting with the Navy regarding conven-tional steam propulsion system training for an On-Board Operator Training Program, directing the development of EOSS for the AO-180 and the AO-186 ships, directing the shipboard training of propulsion engineering crews aboard 1052-Class ships on the West Coast, and directing a research program aimed at applying recent developments in instructional technology to propulsion engineering technician training. As an Instructional Psychologist, is responsible for identifying user characteristics and tailoring intstructional material in accordance with these characteristics, developing a methodology for performing a training objective commonality analysis on the Woodward Electric Governor curriculum, specifying fleet evaluation procedures for the On-Board Maintenance Training Program, and developing experimental designs for assessing the impact of instructional technology developments on propulsion engineering technician training effectiveness and efficiency.
Recent experiences include the application of, direction of, and participation in, the self-paced, individualized, mixed-media approaches to the Hagan Automatic Boiler Control Advanced Maintenance Course and the Woodward Electric Governor Curriculum developments. Also directed the development of the LHA-Consolidated Control System Maintenance Course, using a lecture-supported-by-visual aid approach. In addition, was an author of 12 research and technical reports related to instructional technology during the past three years.
1970 - 1976 Nebo, Incorporated: Duties were to serve as Chief Executive Officer. In this capacity, was responsible for performing research and directing the development of instructional systems design, including analysis of training requirements, selection and design of training devices and media, specification of perform-ance-oriented training program, curriculum development instructor handbook preparation and training ef fectiveness evaluation. Completed a feasibility study for a generalized Navy electronics warfare trainer, participated in the design of a multi-station trainer with the computer serving as an instructor surrogate, and a Boiler Technician Maintenance training course.
1969 - 1970 American Psychological Association: Executive Editor of PSYCHOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS, and Manager of Psychological Abstracts Information Services (PAIS). Responsible for the production of a monthly abstracting and indexing publication containing about 25,000 records annually. Also responsible for conceiving, designing and implementing innovations, including:
automated search and retrieval services, cummulative indexes, and a Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms. Also modified production procedures, including directing the design of an in-house encoding capability that can be used to produce a variety of publications. Was responsible for defining a five-year development plan designed to enhance scientific communications in psychology. In this capacity, directed research efforts to assess existing products and services, and evaluate 'esigned the feasibility of se'veral innovations. Research methods used included pilot system operations, questionnaire surveys, inter-views, and cost/trade analyses.
1966- 1969 American Institutes for Research: Responsible for directing research involving human performance. Directly participated in studies of training systems evaluation, decision making research, and human information processing capabilities. Was co-editor of the Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, and co-author of a chapter on Training Device Design and on Design of Controls. Participated in the development of a task taxonomy which would provide structure to basic research results and permit the prediction of human performance on a variety of tasks.
1963 1966 Aircraft Armaments, Inc.: Head of the Man-Machine Systems Group. Directed research programs related to human perform-ance on complex systems and support programs in the area of human engineering, human reliability, and maintainability.
1960 - 1963 Autonetics, A Division of North American Aviation, Inc.: Pro-vided human engineering support on a number of complex systems such as Minute-Man, Apollo, and RS-70.. Directed research in the areas of employee attitudes, fire-control dis-plays, vision, and decision making.
1957 - 1960 Ohio State University, Laboratory of Aviation Psychology:
Assistant Supervisor - Ohio State University Air Traffic Control research program. Investigated the effectiveness of air traffic control procedures. For two years was engaged in research in the perceptual-motor skills area and directed the activities of a group of undergraduate personnel.
DOUGLAS C. METCALF EDUCATION:
Yale University - B.E., Chemical Engineering Navy Nuclear Power School - Nuclear Engineering Army Logistics Management Center - Test and Evaluation Management PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
1977 - Present ESSEX CORPORATION Alexandria, Virginia Division Director Directed and coordinated the contract performance of a number of Essex Corporation operating divisions. These include the Special Engineering Division, Infor-mation Sciences Division and overall management cognizance of Essex'ehavioral Sciences activities, including support to nuclear utility customers.
Director of Special En ineerin Division Responsible for fisca an techn>cal per ormance o a I programs and projects assigned to the division. Programs spanned a variety of technical areas including: system performance monitoring and material condition assessment, submarine maintenance and life cycle support strategies, shipboard life support system design and upgrade support, electrical power harmonic reduction, training materials development.
Senior Pro ram Mana er Responsible for coordination of multi-faceted technical and management support services to the TRIDENT Submarine Acquisition Project Integrated Logistic Support Program. Areas of technical cognizance include: the shipsystem performance monitoring program which is a life cycle performance testing program designed to measure performance degradation to determine material condition margins by utilizing automated data analysis techniques. Program features involved include personnel and training requirements and calibration, ADP systems and hardware requirements and the total engineering development of the test procedures and analysis algorithms.
Senior Consulting Nuclear Engineer to support the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in a task to review the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear station from a Human Factors Engi-neering standpoint. Reviewed all relevant Federal and Industry Standards, Regulatory Guides, Safety Guides, IOCFR50, and the NRC's PSAR, FSAR and SRP requirements to determine the extent of influence upon the plant design and operation of HFE aspects vis-a-vis published design criteria and design bases.
Evaluated the sequence of events in the early hours of the accident to determine and define the primary, secondary and auxiliary systems'ehavior and interactions; assessed the adequacy and availability of plant stations indications and operator/management response thereto.
1972 - 1977 NAVALSHIP ENGINEERING CENTER Site Coordinator for the lead site of the SSBN Shipsystem Maintenance Monitoring and Support Office (SMMSO). Coordi-nated all aspects of a 20-man remote site team engaged in performance monitoring and tracking system material condition for over 60 critical shipsystems. Responsible for review, implementation and operational interface aspects of all test and inspection procedures. Handled all features of site team operations including communications, personnel, administration, procurement and support of test equipment, scheduling of all testing and associated maintenance recommendations.
Program manager for the SMMSO Ferrographic Oil Analysis program. Evaluated, developed and implemented this technique of wear particle examination which offers substantial failure prediction for oil lubricated machinery.
1966 - 1972 UNITED STATES NAVY As the Supervisor of Shipbuilding's representative, participated in and witnessed the Board of Inspection and Survey (INSURV) trials for three new construction SSNs and two Deep Submer-gence Vehicles (DSV). Witnessed and directed numerous shipbuilder's trials for new construction SSNs. Maintained status and reported progress of the shipyard test progrm from criticality through dock trials and fast cruise for the new construction submarine USS FLYING FISH, SSN673.
Developed and enforced an on-site inspection program for the major upkeep and trials of the DSVs SEA CLIFF and TURTLE at a location remote from the contractor's facility. Performed as the Government's senior on-site representative during this 3-month period.
While attached to the Squadron staff, revised the Squadron's procedures for implementing the Type Commande'r's Alteration and Improvement (A@I) program to improve completion status accountability, logistic support and timely accomplishment.
As.a nuclear submariner, made three (3) POLARIS deterrent patrols, four upkeep periods including two drydockings; qualified in submarines, qualified Engineering Officer of the Watch, Damage Control Assistant, Ship's Diving Officer, Auxiliary Division Officer and 3M Officer.
THOMAS A. HARDING EDUCATION:
1980 Senior Reactor Operator Permit - USNRC North Anna Nuclear Power Station Unit '1 and Unit 2 1978 Reactor Operator License - USNRC North Anna Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 1975 Retraining Qualification - Westinghouse Zion Power Station-Simulator, Zion, Illinois 1973 Reactor Operator License - USAEC Surry Power Station - Unit 1 and Unit 2 EXPERIENCE:
May 1980 ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Staff Nuclear 0 erations S ecialist - Primary function is to provide operations support for the application of human factors engineering principles in NPP control room reviews. This includes developing format and text of various Emergency and Operation Procedures for Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 and assisting in reviews of Human Engineering Deficiencies for Grand Gulf and Calvert Cliffs nuclear power stations. Partici-pated in control room design and layout reviews for Grand Gulf, Virgil C. Summer, Calvert Cliffs, and Indian Point.
September 1970- VIRGINIAELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY May 1980
- Directed shift operation during routine, emergency, and
- "'tation start-up duties of the 900Mw Pressurized Water Reactor Units.
Coordinated the revisions of Emergency Procedures for imple-menting two unit operation.
Senior Reactor permit issued with the first post-TMI tested group; included specific training in thermodynamics and natural convection problems of large PWRs.
Served as Site Coordinator of the Control Room Review Task Force to find out and correct deficiencies in human engineering in the control room of North Anna Power Station. This involved serving as liaison between Virginia Electric and Power. Company, as operators, Essex Corporation, as reviewers, and the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as monitors. Later the position was concerned with implementing backfits to solve the designated problems.
Control Room 0 erator - Reactor Operator, North Anna Power Station - Performed start-up, emergency and routine duties of two 900 Mw Pressurized Water Reactor Units including pre-operation checkouts and design modification drafting of safety and nonsafety related systems.
Control Room 0 erator-Reactor 0 erator, Surr Power Station-Performed start-up, emergency and routine duties of two 822 Mw Pressurized Water Reactor Units including preoperational checkouts of safety and nonsafety related systems.
Twelfth Street Power Station - Performed start-up and routine operations on two unit coal fired station.
ALBERT E. STRONG EDUCATION:
1967 Course A Basic Instructor Training 1967 Basic Leadership Principles 1961 U.S. Naval School Instructors, Class C-1 A Course 1957 Nuclear Power Training - Certified as Qualified Operator of S1W Nuclear Propulsion Plant 1956 Basic Nuclear Power Course 1955 Electronics Technician, Class A Service Training - U.S. Navy EXPERIENCE:
Sept. 1980- ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia 0 erations S ecialist - Operations advisor to Human Factors Engineering reviews in NPP control rooms.
Aug. 1970- VIRGINIAELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Sept. 1980 shift supervisor of preoperational construction and testing of Surry Power Plant Units 1 and 2. Received training at Surry Plant and now hold NRC Senior Operator License //SOP-1900 for Surry Units 1 and 2. Transferred to North Anna Power Station as Shift Supervisor in August 1972. Supervised Prestartup and Startup check of Units 1 and 2. Hold Senior Operator License 7/SOP-2999-2 amended March 2, 1980 to include North Anna Unit 2.
Aug. 1956- UNITED STATES NAVY Aug. 1970 Chief Electronic Technicain 8/67 to 8/70 - Electronic Instructor and Assistant to Phase Supervisor, with duty as instructor in electronics.
1/66 to 8/67- Chief of the Reactor Division aboard the USS Haddock for the precommissioning detail checking out equipment and supervisor of the engineering watch.
10/63 to 1/66- Assigned as Leading Petty Officer - Reactor Control Division aboard the USS Von Steuben during precritical testing period and during three patrols.
9/61 to 10/63- Assistant to the Atomic Energy Commission Representative at G.E. nuclear electronic plant at West Milton, New York, which served as training plant for the UD Navy.
Reviewed all tests prior to Company performance for purpose of damage prevention. Conducted plant inspections to insure proper operation.
8/57 to 7/61 - Performed first sourceless critical core reloading aboard ship.
ELLIOTT H. STEELE EDUCATION:
Various classes towards BSME, Northern Virginia Community College and San Diego Evening College Satisfactorily completed North American Master Conservationist Course NAVY:
Damage Control Assistant Allison 501-K17 GTG Operation and Maintenance EN "C" Power Train Maintenance Leadership and Management DD-963 Engineering Control 4 Surveillance Systems General Electric LM2500 Maintenance Basic Electricity and Electronics Patrol Gunboat Engineering Systems EN "C" Gas Turbine Riverine Assault Craf t Maintenance Engineman "A" Basic Propulsion and Engineering EXPERIENCE:
1979 ESSEX CORPORATION Present San Diego, CA Technical S ecialist - Presently reviewing and rewriting Emergency Procedures for PWR and BWR Nuclear Power Plants.
Performed Quality Assurance of Engineering Operational Sequencing System (EOSS) documentation developed for AO-177 Class Ships. Conducted a study to determine the feasibility of establishing Intermediate Maintenance Assist Teams (IMATs) to support gas turbine maintenance on DD 963 and FFG 7 Class ships. Developed the requirements to implement IMATs.
1976- GEORGE C. SHARP, INC.
1979 Arlington, Virginia Marine En ineerin Technician - Responsible for technical review of all EOSS for 1200 psi, and 600 psi, and gas turbine Navy ships. Reviewed and rewrote the EOSS Development Manual and Naval ships'echnical Manual Chapter 079, Volume
- 3. Developed Chapter 7 of the EOSS Development Manual for DD 963 Class ships. Reviewed, corrected, and revised various naval technical manuals, allowance parts lists, and planned
maintenance documentation for auxiliary equipment. Performed approved SHIPALTS to Navy low-pressure air compressors; analyzed fleet-wide fire pump casualty report and developed a medium-pressure air compressor military specification.
1973- USS SPRUANCE (DD-963) 1976 Assigned as Main Engineroom Supervisor and as Leading Petty Officer of auxiliary group. Responsible for the operation, maintenance, and repair of all propulsion and auxiliary machinery and systems. Contributed direct technical inputs to Personnel Qualification Standards and EOSS development and validated prototype packages. Qualified at all engineering watch stations, including Engineer Officer of the Watch and Repair V Scene Leader. Selected for Limited Duty Officer.
1972- USS WELCH (PG-93) 1973 Operated, maintained, and repaired all main propulsion and auxiliary machinery and their support systems. Qualified Engineer Officer of the Watch.
1970- NAVALADVISORY GROUP 1971 DaNang, Det Cua Viet, RVN Assigned as Engineering Advisor. Responsible for operation, maintenance, and repair training for base electrical generation systems and patrol junks. River patrol advisor and communi-cations liaison.
1969- NAVALSUPPORT ACTIVITY 1970 Det Nha Be/Dong Ha, RVN Assigned to maintenance group. Operated, maintained, and repaired LCM8/6 systems. Participated in RVN personnel training and acted as deployed LCM-8 troubleshooter and relief boat engineer.
1968- INACTSHIPFAC 1969 Portsmouth, VA Assigned to outside maintenance. Operated and maintained diving boat and activity emergency generator.
CAROL A. KAIN EDUCATION:
1979 B.A. - Psychology, The George Washington University EXPERIENCE:
September 1980 - ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Research Associate V.C. Summer Nuclear Power Station (SCERG) - Conducted data collection, reduction, and analysis in control room for the purposes of implementing human factors enhancements.
Participated in relabeling effort to improve component identifi-cation.
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (BGLE) - Participated in human factors evaluation of control room. Collected and analyzed data. Maintained comprehensive documentation files.
Standard Nuclear Unit Power Plant Station (SNUPPS) - Per-orme uman factors evaluation of control room using photo-graphic mosiac, full scale mockup, Westinghouse simulator and the actual control boards. Collected data, evaluated discrepan-cies, recommended backfits, and compiled comprehensive docu-mentation files.
Developed test and evaluation plans based on human factors design guidelines to be utilized by human factors specialists in the nuclear power industry.
Researched and prepared technical paper on the use of coding techniques to minimize operator workload and reduce opera-tional error. Developed design specifications for coding appli-cations to instrumentation and control panels in nuclear power control rooms.
3uly 1980- ADVANCED MANAGEMENTSYSTEMS, INC.
November 1980 Washington, D.C.
Research Associate - Provided research assistance for profes-sional staff on production management programs including state-of-the-art assessment and literature surveys. Designed promotional material and maintained public relations.
CANDACE K. KRICK EDUCATION:
May 1980 B.A. - Political Science, Minor in Psychology, The George Washington University EXPERIENCE:
3une 1980- ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Research Assistant - Data collection in the control rooms of nuclear power plants using checklists which conform to human factors engineering guidelines. Other duties include analyzing human engineering discrepancies and the potential operator error that could result from the discrepancy.
3an. 1980- COMMUNITYMENTAL HEALTH CENTER May 1980 Washington, D.C.
Intern - Active in the condominium conversion issue and its effects on the community, especially on the elderly. Duties included articles written for local newspapers, community meetings, interpersonal communication and interviewing strategies.
June 1979 OAO CORPORATION 3an. 1980 Washington, D.C.
Research Assistant/Su ervisor - Responsible for the preparation and indexing of chronological summaries of internal and public memoranda; letters, requests, and documents for the Depart-ment of Energy program; Building Energy Performance Standards (BEPS). The purpose of this summary was to provide information to the Office of General Counsel for the Department of Energy and to provide updated materials for Freedom of Information Act requests. Other duties included responding to public requests, the organization of mass mailings, and other adminis-trative duties as directed.
3an. 1979- COMMUNITYLAW OFFICES May 1979 Washington, D.C.
of legal research, client interviews, and the preparation of various legal documents. Other duties centered on the preparation of materials related to divorce, landlord and tenant, immigration law, and child support matters.
DIANE 3EORLING EDUCATION 1980 B.A. - Mathematics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri EXPERIENCE:
3une 1980- ESSEX CORPORATION Present , Alexandria, Virginia Research Assistant - Presently assigned to the Energy Program within the Behavioral Sciences Division. Responsible for identifying and evaluating discrepancies from human engineeering standards and practices in nuclear power plant control room panel design, workspace layout and control/display integration. Suggest potential backfits to eliminate design deficiencies and to enhance the interface between the human operator and power plant instrumentation.
Perf ormed separate analyses of panel labeling and alarm annunciator nomenclature to identify and correct readability problems. Identified inconsistencies and devised dictionary to standardize use of acronyms and abbreviations in panel labeling.
In reviewing alarm annunciator test, determined priority alarms and developed configuration plan to ensure that high priortiy alarms are most discriminable. Standardized annunciator vocabulary and legend format. Developed human engineering specification for alarm annunciator design based on human engineering criteria.
Assisted in developing human engineering checklists, the instruments used to identify human/system deficiencies in nuclear power plant control rooms. Validated and revised checklists following their application in seven operating and design-phase nuclear power plant control rooms. Reported discrepancies identified by checklists and recommended potential backfits. Interviewed operators concerning operability of the control panel and workspace design. Conducted surveys to evaluate sufficiency and efficiency of lighting communications and anthropometry of instrument placement.
TIMOTHY K. O'DONOGHUE EDUCATION:
Expected 1983 M.A. - Candidate, Industrial Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 1979 B.A. - Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia EXPERIENCE:
ESSEX CORPORATION Alexandria, Virginia 1980 - Research Assistant - Contributed to the development of nuclear
'ovember Present power plant human engineering design guidelines in a contract with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Authored the section on control room operator tasks and visual system proces-sing.
As part of a specialized team, conducted checklist evaluation of several operating and design phase nuclear power plant control rooms. Contributed to the development of guidelines for con-ducting human engineering evaluation of operating nuclear power plant control rooms on contract to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Developed and validated checklists and other evaluation instruments.
On contract to NASA's Life Sciences Program, reviewed past Life Sciences'xperiments (from Biospex, Cosmos 936, etc.).
Reviewed proposals for Space Platform experiments to deter-mine if the variables to be measured in each proposed experi-ment progress as a function of mission duration to avoid redundancy in experiments conducted.
Assisted in developing an automated mailing list for application to NASA's Life Science Program.
Conducted research and review of literature in support of contract to update MIL-STD-1072B, human engineering design guide for military systems, equipment, and facilities.
Abstracted literature concerned with modern control/display criteria.
Performed literature review on research to develop a methodology for evaluating the human factors characteristics of the human-computer interface and dialogue for the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (TECOM). Review literature concerned with modern human computer interface and dialogue criteria.
Acted as liaison on a contract to the Cybernetics Technology Office of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Research support to that office and their suppliers included identification of new technologies, acquisition of equip-ment and publications, and editing and packaging of technical papers.
Securit Clearance Level:
Secret (DISCO).
3OHN M. 3ACOBY EDUCATION Commercial Photography, Northern Virginia Community College EXPERIENCE:
1979- ESSEX CORPORATION Present Alexandria, Virginia Staff Photo ra her - Provided photographic documentation of twelve nuclear power plant control rooms. 'Produced and assembled photographic full-scale mockup of TMI-2 control room. Provided technical assistance on video tape of TMI-2 incident timeline.
1979 UNITED WAY OF AMERICA Alexandria, Virginia Publication, Community Focus.
PUBLICATION:
Communit Focus, May, 3une and 3uly 1979; Cover and article photographs.
APPENDIX C PROJECT MANAGEMENT/NUCLEAR OPERATIONS/PLANT ENGINEERING AND DESIGN GROUP RESUMES
William T. Gainey, Jr.
Project Specialist - Special Projects Birthdate: January 24, 1943 Education:
1961- Brookland Cayce High School, West Columbia, South Carolina 1962- University of South Carolina (approximately one year)
Richland Tech., Columbia, South Carolina 1965- Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Power Assoc., Inc. (CVNPA)
Reactor Operator Training successfully completed and obtained RO License.
1968- DeKalb Tech., Clarkston, Georgia (1 quarter) 1967-1969- Georgia Institute of Technology - Reactor Operator Training successfully completed and RO License obtained.
1969- Present - Carolina Power 6 Light Company 1970- Cold RO License Training and licensed on HBR-2.
1972- Senior RO License Training and licensed on HBR-2 Trained and requalified until 1976.
~Ex erience:
1963-1967 - CVNPA, Inc.
January 1963 - August 1965 - Reactor Technician Trainee August 1964 - April 1967 - Reactor Operator - (NO. OP-1946)
Approximately 4000 hours0.0463 days <br />1.111 hours <br />0.00661 weeks <br />0.00152 months <br /> console time, 150 start-ups, and 20 shutdowns - Participated in initial core loading and criticality, three refuelings or fuel shuffles, and various physics tests'lso qualified as a Health Physics Technician and a Chemistry Technician.
1967-1969 - Georgia Institute of Technology Reactor Operator (NO. OP-2356) - Approximately 2000 hours0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br /> console time, 116 start-ups, and 50 shutdowns.
1969-1976 - Carolina Power 8 Light Company 1969-1972 - Control Operator - H. B. Robinson Unit 2 1970 - Cold RO Licensed (NO. OP-2792) - Approximately 2000 hours0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br /> console time, performed initial criticality, participated in hot functional and low power physics testing.
1972-1976 - Shift Foreman - H. B. Robinson Unit 2 1972 - Senior Reactor Operator's License (SOP-1611)
Approximately 7000 hours0.081 days <br />1.944 hours <br />0.0116 weeks <br />0.00266 months <br /> supervising operation of HBR-1 (coal-fired) and Unit 2 (nuclear).,
1976-1978 - Senior QA Specialist - Operations QA.
Performed numerous surveillances at nuclear plants to determine compliance with regulations.
N032-Z-l
1978-1980 - Project Administration Specialist-
-Responsible for administrative duties for Generation Department such as: plant statistics and reporting, recruiting, contracts, various departmental reports to Group Executives, and testimony preparation for Executives to Utility Commissions.
1980-Present - Project Specialist - Special Projects Nuclear Operations Department
-Primary Project - Hanaging and providing operations input to the detailed human factors control room design review for three nuclear plants.
-Corporate THI Coordinator - Responsibility for coordination of all THI projects at CPSL nuclear plants (including budgeting, reporting, and licensing interfaces).
N032-Z-2
DAVID LESTER PHIPPS$ JR.
PROJECT ENGINEER Birthdate: May 26, 1953 Education & Trainin N. C. S. U. 1975 B.S. Industrial Engineering N. C. S. U. - 1977 M.S. Industrial Engineering (w. Duke University) (minor Health Systems Delivery)
Registered Professional Engineer North Carolina Professional Affiliations & Achievements:
Alpha Phi Mu (Scholastic) Honor Fraternity American Institute of Industrial Engineers - Senior Member Ex erience Prior to Joinin CP&L:
1975: Graduate Assistant N. C. S. U. - Raleigh 1975-1977: Asst. Management Engineer Watts Hospital - Durham 1977-1978: Management Engineer Durham County General Hospital Durham 1978-1979: Management Engineer Rowan Memorial Hospital Salisbury Ex erience with CP&L:
11/01/79: Industrial Engineer Work Force Performance Development Section System Planning & Coordination Department Raleigh 05/02/81: Senior Industrial Engineer Work Force Performance Development Section System Planning & Coordination Department - Raleigh 06/81: Senior Industrial Engineer Work Force Performance Development Section Planning & Coordination Department Raleigh 05/82: Project Engineer - Work Force Performance Development Section Planning & Coordination Department -'aleigh 3/1/83
RICHARD KENT COTHREN Princi al En ineer - Electrical BIRTH DATE: July 9, 1939 I. EDUCATION A. B.S. Degree in Nuclear Engineering from North Carolina State University - 1967 B. ~I.S. Degree in Nuclear Engineering from North Carolina State University 1969 II. EXPERIENCE A. 1958 - 1964
- l. U. S. Navy
- a. Served as Radar Repair Technician for eighteen months aboard USS Saratoga
- b. Thirty months at U. S. Naval Nuclear Power Training Unit (six months as Reactor, Operator, Reactor Technician Trainee; two years as Staff Instructor for Reactor Operator, Reactor Technician Trainees). One ye'ar aboard USS Enterprise as Reactor Operator.
B. October 1964 August 1967
- 1. North Carolina State University
- a. (Corked as part-time reactor operator at Burlington Nuclear Laboratory on NCSU campus. Holder of AEC Operator's License on the NCSU research reactor.
C. July 1969 February 1974
- 1. Babcock & Wilcox Company Served as Test 4'orking Group Representative for Babcock & Wilcox on Arkansas Nuclear One.
- b. Served as Senior Shift Engineer during Zero Power Physics and Power Escalation t'esting at Oconee Unit One.
C ~ Site Operations Engineer for Babcock & Nilcox Nuclear One. Primary Duties: Provide advice at'rkansas and consultation to Arkansas Power & Light on equipment and systems supplied by Babcock & hilcox. Responsible for direct supervision of 3-5 Babcock & flilcox service engineers assigned to Arkansas Nuclear One.
Richard Kent Cothren Page 2 D. Narch 1974 to Present
- 1. Carolina Power & Light Company
- a. Employed as Project Engineer Nuclear in the Nuclear Plant Engineering Section of the Power Plant Engineering Department. Assigned to the Brunswick Project.
- b. January 1977 Promoted to Principal Engineer Project in the Project Engineering Section of the Power Plant Engineering Department. Responsible for the planning, scheduling, estimating, cost control, and overall co-ordination of the engineering-related activities assigned to the Power Plant Engineering Department for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SHNPP) construction project by interacting with all project entities; by management of the Ebasco, and other applicable engineering contracts, and by managing, supervising. developing, training, and motivating an organization of. Company employees to carry out such activities.
- c. December 1, 1979 Transferred as Principal Engineer-Electrical to the Harris Plant Engineering Section of the Nuclear Power Plant Engineering Department III. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES A. American Nuclear Society
ELWOOD L. EVANS SSii 246-50-9704 HOME ADDRESS 1607 Sycamore Drive Garner, N. C. 27529 919-779-2546 PERSONAL Born November 16, 1930 Married Two Children Member - Instrument Society of America Tar Heel Capital Area EDUCATION 1977 Electrical Engineering International Correspondence Schools 1966 Electronics Technician International Correspondence Schools 1963 General Electronics International Correspondence Schools 1959 Electronics 1 Wayne Technical Institute Goldsboro, N.C.
1948 High School Princeton, N.C.
EMPLOY1'fENT 1957 Present Carolina Power & Light Co.
1979 Present Senior Engineer Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, New Hill, N.C.
Responsibility same as 1977-1979, SHNPP only, and including:
Co-ordinated redesign of the Main Control Board with the Human Factors Consultant, Design Consultant, and MCB supplier. This also included additional Support Control Boards.
- 2. Plant Fire Detection System
- 3. Plant instrument cabinets and racks.
EHPLOYifENT (continued)
- 4. Interface equipment for plant safeguards and control.
1977 1979 Engineer, Corporate Headquarters Raleigh, N.C.
Responsibility divided between Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, ifayo Electric Generating Plant (fossil),
Roxboro Flectric Generating Plant (fossil), and included:
- 1. Review and approval of Instrumentation Specifications.
- 2. Review and approval of Instrumentation and Control drawings.
- 3. Purchase authorization
- 4. Equipment (electrical) qualification for nuclear plants.
1970 1977 Technician H. F. Lee Electric Generating Station-Goldsboro, N.C. Duties same as 1957-1969.
Primary responsibility was maintenance of Electronic Control Systems and Control Boards.
1969 - 1970 Technician H. B. Robinson Electric Generating Plant Hartsville, S. C. Instrument calibration and Control System Tests during construction stage of a PWR unit.
Was on temporary assignment to Rochester Gas 6 Electric, Rochester, N.Y. for system tests during hot functional test and fuel loading at a PWR station.
1967 1969 Electrician H. F. Lee Electric Generating Plant/
Horehead City Duties extended to installation supervision of electrical and control systems at an internal combustion turbine generator at Norehead City, N.C.
Responsibility included startup and operation at this facility.
EHPLOYfENT (continued) 1957 1967 Carolina Power 6 Light Co.
Raleigh, N.C.
Electrican H. F. Lee Electric Generating Plant, Goldsboro, N.C.
Duties were maintenance of electrical, electronic, pneumatic, and hydraulic control systems, electric motors, switchgear, control boards, and telemetering devices.
1953 - 1957 Employed by contractor Electrical/HVAC. Residential, commercial, light industrial.
Duties Installation and maintenance of electrical and HVAC systems.
James Howard Smith Director, Nuclear & Simulator Training November 19, 1940 Education and Trainin A. Graduation from high school i'faxton, North Carolina 1959 B. Completion of one year at the University of North Carolina C. Special Training
- 1. Westinghouse Reactor Operator Training Program - July 1968 to August 1969
- 2. Certification for AEC Reactor Operator's License on Saxton Plant August 1969
- 3. AEC Cold Senior Reactor Operator License on H. B. Rooinson Plant June 1970 Professional Societies None Experience A. Carolina Power & Light Co.
- 1. January 1961 to July 1961 - Trainee - Weatherspoon Plant, Lumberton, NC
- 2. July 1961 to June 1963 Helper Weatherspoon Plant, Lumberton, NC
- 3. June 1963 toApril 1964 Auxiliary Operator Sutton Plant, Wilmington, NC
- 4. April 1964 to July 1964 - Control Operator In Training - H. B.
Robinson Plant, Hartsville, SC
- 5. July 1964 to ifarch 1970 Control Operator - H. B. Robinson Plant, Hartsville, SC
- 6. March 1970 to February 1976 Shift Foreman .Nuclear Generation Section of the Generation & System Operations Department at the H. B. Robinson Plant, Hartsville, SC
- 7. February 1976 to "fay 1977 Nuclear Generation Specialists III (Training Coordinator) Nuclear Generation Section of the Bulk Power Supply Department at the H. B. Robinson Plant, Hartsville, SC
RESHAPE (Continued)
James Howard Smith
- 8. Hay 1977 to October 1977 - Senior Nuclear Generation Specialist, Generation Department, Generation Services Section, Raleigh, NC
- 9. October 1977 to April 1980 Senior Generation Specialist-Generation Department, Generation Services Section, Raleigh, NC
- 10. April 1980 employed as Senior Specialist Operator Training, Nuclear Operations Department, Nuclear Training Section, New Hill, NC ll. February 1981 Promoted to Project Specialist Simulator, Technical Services Department, Nuclear Training Section, HE&EC, New Hill, NC
- 12. October 1981 employed as Director Nuclear & Simulator Training, Technical Services Department, Nuclear Training Section, HE&EC, New Hill, NC JB/wc 4/14/81
William C. Cooper, ZIZ Engineer July 14, 1945 Education and Trainin A. Diploma in Electrical Engineering - Electronics option, International Correspondence Schools, 1979 B. Associate of General Studies Degree, Jackson Junior College, 1969 C. Avionics repair course, U. S. Army, Southeastern Signal Corps School, (7 months) 1964
~Ex erience A. January, 1964 January, 1967 U. S. Army Aviation Electronics and Electrical Specialist (E-5). Repair of aviation communication gear, navigation equipment, autopilot systems, aire aft engine starters, generators, instruments, batteries.
February, 1967 - August, 1967 - Electronics Test Technician< IBM, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Test and repair of data processing terminals, card and paper tape reader/printers, keyboards.
September, '1967 December, 1967 - Electronics Test Technician, Sparton Electronics, Jackson, Michigan. Environmental and vibration test operations on military aircraft navigation equipment.
February, 1968 - April, 1969 - Electronics Repairman, McUmbers T.V.,
Jackson, Michigan. Repair radios, televisions, audio eauipment.
June, 1969 September, 1969 - Engineering Technician, Mechanical Products, Jackson, Michigan. Assisted QA Engineer in evaluating mil spec and commerical aircraft circuit breaker defects and rejects.
September, 1969 April, 1971 - Electronics Test Technician, Sparton Electronics, Jackson, Michigan. Construct and test prototype circuits for sonobuoys, design printed circuit boards, designed and built special-purpose test equipment.
B. April, 1971, employed as Engineering Aide I in the Fossil Generation Section of the Generation and Systems Operations Department, located in the General Office, Raleigh, NC. Maintained plant maintenance records in General Office, processed contracts, plant monthly operating reports, EEI unit availability data (Fossil and Nuclear).
July, 1972, employed as Engineer'ng Tech. IZ in the Fossil and Hydzo Generation Section of the Bulk Powe Supply Department, located in the General Office, Raleigh, NC. Same as above at higher pay.
July, 1975, employed as Engineering Tech. I in the Fossil and Hydro Generation Section of the Bulk Power Supply Department, located in the General Office, Raleigh, NC. Same as general work except in September, 1976 started working for System Turbine Generator Engineer. Duties included manpower/cost t acking accumulating during turbine outages, critical path network developing/tracking, spare parts ordering/expediting, limited suoervision of cont act employees on various turbine jobs, designed and directed installation of turbine lube oil system modifications, wrote turbine inspection/repair procedures, designed 480 to 240/120 VAC protable substations for
,turbine outage work, prepared plant and packages at BSEP for the turbine-generator units.
December, 1979, employed as Engineer in the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Section of the Nuclea Operations Department, located in the General Office, Raleigh, NC. Write system descriptions, generic check-out procedures, determine boundaries and prepare RFT turnover packages, become familiar with assigned systems, assist in Hain Control Board re-design, prepa e critical path network for assigned system's turnover, review and write proposed Tech. Specs.,
become familiar with industry standards and regulatory guideC, assisted RSEP with SI/loss of offsite power PT, planned and directed turbine lube oil system flushs at BSEP.
ATTAQ91ENT 2 ERRATA PAGES TO SHNPP-1 DCRDR S&iMARY REPORT
HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN EVALUATIONREPORT FOR THE SHEARON HARRIS UNIT 1 CONTROL ROOM Prepared for:
Carolina Power 8c Light Raleigh, North Carolina Prepared by:
Essex Corporation 333 North Fairfax Street Alexandria, Virginia 22310 23 3anuary 1981 Revised 16 September 1981 10 April 1983
SECTION 3.0 MAIN CONTROL BOARD DESIGN 3.1 Introduction The SHNPP-1 main control board (MCB) design was evaluated using CPRL-supplied layout drawings.
3.2 Procedures
- a. The MCB drawings were reviewed for component location discrepancies and HED reports were written for all identified problems. All HED reports were reviewed and operationally verified by CPRL operations specialists.
- b. Preliminary design review meetings were held between CPRL and Essex at which previously developed conceptual sketches were discussed. The purpose of these meetings was to illustrate various human factors design concepts such as functional grouping, operational sequencing, demarcation, and hierarchical labeling.
'c. A redesign effort was conducted by CPRL to resolve all identified grouping and sequencing problems with the MCB. Essex furnished human factors support during this activity. CPRL constructed a half-scale mockup on which component modules could be moved to various locations for reevaluation.
- d. Preliminary arrangements were developed and translated into front panel drawings by CPBcL. Design review meetings were held at which CPRL, Westinghouse, EBASCO, and Essex evaluated the proposed MCB design.
- e. Final front panel design drawings were produced by CPRL which addressed all issues and concerns identified at the design reviews.
- f. Individual components and other control room features were evaluated using checklists in the Harris simulator control room. Preliminary HED reports were generated by Essex and reviewed by CPRL for their applicability to the anticipated SHNPP-1 control room.
- g. When judged applicable these HED reports were used to either trigger the development of an HERS or to alert SHNPP-1 engineering and start-up personnel of potential human factors problems in the anticipated design.
3.3 Results
- a. A total of 130 final HED reports were generated during the Harris review.
These reports were generated based upon a review of the SHNPP-1 MCB design drawings and on a review of the Harris simulator.
- b. A total of 09 of the 130 HED reports identified potential grouping and sequencing problems on the MCB.
- c. The remaining 85 HED reports were based upon the Harris simulator control room. These reports addressed the physical characteristics of various types and styles of components on the simulator, and also addressed general simulator control room features such as the readability of labeling, room communications, instrument glare, and room illumination levels.
- d. The redesign effort on the MCB resulted in the correction and resolution of all the grouping and sequencing discrepancies. Panel labeling problems were also corrected or resolved during this activity. Reduced copies of the final arrangement drawings appear in Appendix B. The primary results of the redesign activities were:
o The arrangement of all system-, function-, or logically-related components into coherent physical groups o The arrangement of these groups on the MCB in such a way as to optimally support operator use and movement during emergency, abnormal, and normal plant operations o The arrangement of all components within groups to support operator task requirements o The application of demarcation lines around all groups o The application of hierarchical labeling to all groups, sub-groups, and special function components o V/here required, the application of mimic lines and mimic symbology.
- e. Various HERSs were developed as a response to a number of the HED reports (see Section 2.0).
3.0 Recommendations
- a. Essex recommends that the CPRL-developed MCB design be implemented for SHNPP-1. It is recognized that future additions to this design are likely; therefore, it is recommended that the design techniques and review processes used for this initial development be rigorously applied to any subsequent MCB modifications. 1'his will ensure that all changes incorporate good human factors and operational requirements and are fully integrated into the current MCB design.
- b. Essex further recommends that all discrepancies identified on the remaining HED reports be resolved.
DRAFT SER OPEN ITEM 22 (SGEB/OOT-4) gUESTIQN:
During construction, measurements were taken on monuments to record vertical and horizontal movements of structures. Groundwater levels also were recorded. The staff requires the applicant to provide a summary of these measurements,and to describe plans and criteria for future monitoring of structure movements and piezometric levels.
RESPONSE
This is a Hydrologic & Geotechnical Engineering Branch Open item in the Draft Safety Evaluation Report (DSER), and part of the item was previously addressed in FSAR Safety Review Question 220.06.
Attachment I provides the response to Question 220.06.
During construction, the settlement of structures is monitored in accordance with SHNPP Work Procedure WP-25, entitled "Field Engineering." A summary of the settlement readings is provided in Attachment II, which is also identified as WP-25, Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 4. This summary includes the quarterly set:tlement readings obtained at 55 dedicated, structural locations. Some of the locations are no longer accessible, and some locations were recently dedicated. An examination of Attachment II is self-explanatory in this respect.
Groundwater elevations are being monitored by Nuclear Plant Construction Department (NPCD) in accordance with Technical Procedure TP-35, entitled "Monitoring Groundwater Elevation and Marker Movement." Wells and piezometers in the Power Block area are being read on a weekly basis. After pumping of the groundwater ceases, NPCD may re-evaluate the interval between readings. The basis for groundwater monitoring is fully explained in the FSAR Section 2.4.13.
The entire drainage area of Buckhorn Creek northwest of the Jonesboro Fault is underlaid by Triassic rocks of the Newark Group.
Both the Triassic and Pre-Triassic rocks are overlaid by clay soils and saprolite. Numerous soil borings drilled at the plant island, as well as in the auxiliary reservoir area, confirm the existence of up to about 15 ft. of clay soil and saprolite overlaying the Triassic rocks. Excavation and mapping of trenches in the plant site area, as well as excavation and borings for the Site Fault Investigation (Re ference FSAR Pg. 2. 4 . 13-1), also indicate the preponderance of clay and silty loam soils.
The source of groundwater in the area is the rock units of the Sanford Formation of the Newark Group (Triassic). They consist of claystone, shale, siltstone, sandstone, conglomerate, and fanglomerate. An exception to this lithology is the intrusion of WKLH06
gX a l J
l t
thin diabase dikes in the rock (Reference FSAR pgs.2.4.13-1 and 2.4.13-2).
The primary permeability of the Triassic rocks is very low, and the rocks appear to be essentially dry. The Triassic rocks have frac-tures resulting from stress releases; the fractures provide secon-dary permeability in the rocks and are filled with water below the water table. Recharge in the area occurs by percolation of pre-cipitation through the overburden; however, most of the precipita-tion is either returned to the atmosphere through evapo-transpiration or becomes surface runoff.. Therefore, natural recharge to the aquifer occurs at a very low rate.
The precipitation which percolates downward is confined laterally by the diabase dikes and vertically by the absence of open fractures or joints at depth in the Triassic rocks. Numerous attempts to develop groundwater supplies from deep Triassic rocks have not been success-ful since these rocks are tight and relatively dry. However, groundwater is developed in the Triassic basin from hornfels zones adjacent to diabase dikes. The relationship of dikes and fractures to groundwater flow is illustrated diagrammatically on FSAR Figure 2.4.13-3. The use of groundwater in the site region is limited, because of the low yield of the aquifer; most of the wells are for domestic use.
Investigations conducted at the site reveal that geologic and hydrologic conditions in the site area are essentially the same as the regional conditions described in FSAR Section 2.4 .13.1.1. The plant site has been graded to Elevation 260 ft. msl. The pre>>graded site elevations ranged from about 210 ft. to 280 ft. msl; the land surface generally slopes towards the east and southeast.
Groundwater at and around the site occurs principally within jointed rock, generally at depths of 30 to 90 ft. below the original ground surface. Within the Newark Group, larger reserves of groundwater occur in the proximity of diabase dikes. Several small dikes were found in the plant area; groundwater supplies for use during plant construction have been developed in the proximity of the dikes.
Seven wells with a total capacity of about 200 gal../min. were completed during 1973 and are being used during the construction phase. Additionally, eight new wells, which increased the total capacity of all wells to about 450 gal./min., were developed in the proximity of diabase dikes during 1977-1979 (FSAR Table 2.4.13-2).
Site wells are listed in FSAR Table 2.4.13-2~and they are shown on FSAR Figure 2.4.13-1. Groundwater is being used at the site during the construction phase for (1) concrete batch plant and concrete placement, (2) office and plant use, and (3) grouting. Groundwater is not expected to be used for plant operation after the plant potable water system becomes operational in 1982. Estimated monthly groundwater consumpt'on at the site for .'larch, 1978, through February, 1980, is shown in FSAR Table 2.4.13-3. The estimated plant water requirements through the year 1982 are shown in FSAR Table 2.4.13-4.
VKLH06
A piezometer-level map (FSAR Figure 2.4.13-1), based on water-level measurements taken before commencement of full-scale plant con-struction, shows that the general groundwater movement in the plant area at that time was to the southeast toward White Oak Creek. Most of the original site-area piezometers have been lost due to con-struction activities; therefore, sixteen new piezometers were constructed in D'ecember, 1979. A piezometeric-level map, which is based on water-level readings in production wells, the sixteen new piezometers, and the two old piezometers . taken during the winter of 1979-1980, is shown on FSAR Figure 2.14.13-2. The map is based on the highest wat;er levels observed during this period (FSAR Tables 2.4.13-5 and 2.4.13-6), and they do not necessarily represent static water levels. FSAR Figure 2.4.13-2 shows that the general direction of groundwater movement at the site is still to the southeast toward White Oak Creek.
Yields from known wells in the area generally range up to 20 gpm, but they average only about 5 gpm or about 0.03 gpm/ft. of well (Reference 2.4.13-2 and 2.4.13-4). Generally, the principal areas of groundwater storage in the Triassic Basin are found near diabase dikes which have intruded the Triassic sediments. Fifteen wells that were developed in the proximity of the dikes in the site area are providing water for use during plant construction.
Even though Triassic rocks constitute the major groundwater source within the site environs, they exhibit very low permeability for groundwater storage and movement. Constructed in the Triassic formation of western Wake County, there are 57 wells that have an average depth of 158 ft., and of these wells, 16 percent yield less than 1 gpm, while the average production rate is 5 gpm. Such relatively low permeability also explains why the Triassic formation is the lowest producing groundwater source in the region (Reference FSAR pg. 2.4.13-2). Numerous borings carried out for soils and geologic information in the plant site and reservoir areas confirm the very low permeability of the Triassic formation. The permeabilities of materials in the Auxiliary Reservoir and SHNPP site areas, based on pump-in packer tests, are summarized in FSAR Table 2.4.13-7.
Six site wells located in the proximity of diabase dikes yielded specific capacity values from 24-hour driller's tests that range from 0.16 gpm/ft. to 0.59 gpm/ft'. The specific capacity values correspond to transmissivity values of about. 40 ft.~/day to 130 ft, /day (Reference FSAR pg. 2.4.13"5).
The beds below the surface clay and saprolite zones appear to have two distinct components of permeability. There is a very low permeability in the materials themselves. The second component, of permeability comes from fractures that have resulted from stress release. This is the principal component which is measured as permeability during pump-in tests at the site.
Small amounts of groundwater were encountered in some trenches where fractured rock was evident. After their excavation, the trenches WKLH06
continued to hold surface runoff due to the low permeability of the fine-grained soil and rock materials.
Down-hold pressure testing of the soils and of the Sanford formation was carried out in borings located in the plant site area and in the main dam area (FSAR Sections 2.5.1. and 2.5.6.). In the plant site area, 10 ft. intervals were tested under pressures up to 110 psi in borings BP62, BP68, and BP70 (FSAR Figure 2.5.1-14). Intervals tested ranged from depths of 10 ft. to 145 ft. Several isolated zones registered small water losses under high pressure.
The results of the pressure tests, coupled with the soil conditions observed and mapped in the trenches, confirm that the soils and foundation materials and the permeabilities listed in FSAR Table 2.4.13-7 are representative of those found at the site. At the plant site area, the few zones that exhibited small water losses during pressure testing were isolated intervals that are located between dense, impervious rock layers which registered no water losses during pressure testing. The impermeable zones ranged in thickness from 10 to 50 ft. above and below each interval that had a water. loss.
Hydrogeologic information from borings and published data indicate that the small water losses in the above mentioned borings were due primarily to fracture confluence instead of formation texture or permeability changes in the Sanford formation of the Newark Group.
Groundwater is being utilized at the site during construction.
During plant operation, it will still be used by the non-operations personnel until construction is completed. FSAR Table 2.4.13-4 shows the total site groundwater use for the years 1980 through 1982. Site groundwater usage is expected to gradually decrease due to the decline in construction activities.
FSAR Figures 2.4.13-1 and 2.4.13-2 compare the pre-construction piezometric level to that existing during the winter of 1979-1980.
The groundwater levels, which have been affected considerably, are declining due to pumpage from the site wells. Cones of depression have developed on the northeastern and the southwestern sides of the plant around wells which are being pumped. Directions of groundwater movement have been reversed in the proximity of some wells, as depicted by the cones of depression. The levels are expected to return to 'near normal as the construction use of water declines.
The ifain Reservoir operating level is Elevation 220 ft. msl, and the elevation of the Auxiliary Reservoir is Elevation 252 ft. msl.
Three main cones of depression have groundwater levels lower than Elevation 190 ft. msl. When the reservoirs are at operating levels, the subsurface flow of water is toward the cones of depression from the two reservoirs and the water levels in the cones of depression are expected to gradually achieve partial recovery. After con" struction is completed and the groundwater level has recovered, groundwater will move toward the Hain Reservoir.
WKLH06
Sixteen piezometers that were installed in November, 1979 are available at the plant site~in addition to two pre-construction piezometers. The piezometers and site wells pr'ovide data on water levels, hydraulic gradient, and direction of flow. Mater levels in piezometers and site wells are measured periodically and analyzed to assess the effect of construction on the site groundwater regime.
The subsurface portions of Seismic Category I structure on the plant island are designed for hydrostatic loadings with groundwater at Elevation 251 ft. msl. A permanent dewatering system is not utilized for the Shearon Harris. Nuclear Power Plant. Groundwater occurring in widely separated joints in the rock did not signifi-cantly affect construction. Any rain or surface water that accu-mulated during construction was pumped out by sump pumps.
The pre-construction piezometric-level map, shown on FSAR Figure 2.4.13-1, indicates that the piezometric levels were higher than Elevations 251 ft. msl under some sections of the plant. However, the lack of significant inflow of groundwater in the completed plant block excavation indicates that groundwater in the rock occurs only in widely separated joints and bedding planes. The perimeter of the plant structure up to the top of the mats has been backfilled with residual soil which is of very low permeability (estimated to be less than 10 ft./yr). Additionally, the winter 1979-1980 piezometric-level map (FSAR Figure 2.4.13-2) shows .Chat water levels beneath the plant area are well below Elevation 251 ft. msl.
The source of surface water higher than the design basis groundwater level is the Emergency Service Mater Intake Channel of the Auxiliary Reservoir, which has an operating level at Elevation 252 ft. msl, the closest point of which comes to within about 300 ft. of the plant island. The Auxiliary Reservoir will not, raise the groundwater elevation beneath the plant island above Elevation 251 msl for the following reasons:
a) The residual soil underlying the reservoir is of very low permeability as indicated by testing.
b) After the Auxiliary and Hain Reservoirs are filled, groundwater will move from the reservoirs to the cones of depression created by the pumpage from wells. However, the major portion of the groundwater flow will be from the Auxiliary Reservoir to the Hain Reservoir.
c) Groundwater from the Auxiliary Reservoir will start moving toward the plant island at an Elevation of about 252 ft. msl.
However, the water level will be at a much lower level than Ele-vations 251 ft. i'fSL by the time it reaches the plant island due to the hydraulic head loss as it flows through the low permeability materials for a distance of about 300 ft.
MKLH06
ATTACHMENT I FSAR SAFETY REVIEW QUESTION 220.06 WKLH06
220.06 Discuss the surveillance plan for the structural (3.7.2) settlement and demonstrate why such surveillance program is adequate to detect excessive settlements. Define excessive settlement and discuss what it means in terms of structural adequacy by translating the settlement to stresses and strains of structural elements. Discuss plans for corrective measures once excessive-settlement is detected. Demonstrate quantitatively why such corrective measures will be adequate in protecting structures from dynamic and statistic loads as well as from further settlement in the future., Include all the Category I structures in the above discussions, buried structures as well as the structures above the ground level.
RESPONSE: With the exception of the Main Dam and Auxiliary Dam, there is no planned systematic testing or surveillance programs for the Category I structures (FSAR Sections 3.8.3.7, 3.8.4.7, 3.8.5.7). Foundation mats for Category I structures are supported by rock (FSAR Sections 3.8.1.1.1, 3.8.4, and 3.8.5). The bearing pressures calculated for Category 1 structures are below the design bearing capacity resulting in a safety factor of 36 with respect to the ultimate bearing capacity (FSAR Sections 3.8. 1.4.3, 2.5.4. 11, and 2.5.0.4). The subgrade reaction acting on the Category I foundation mats-%as been considered as elastic (FSAR Section 3.8.5.4.1). The pseudo-elastic compression of the bedrock results in a settlement that is essentially taking place during the load application'or construction phase (FSAR Section 2.5.0.4). The perimeter of Category I foundation mats are in direct contact with essentially impermeable Triassic rock. The clay/saprolite layer has been removed resulting in a negligible potential for subsidence (FSAR Section 2.5.4.6.8, Appendix 2.5E). The calculated settlements of Category I structures range from 0.008 feet to 0.035 feet (FSAR Section 2.5.4.10.1.3., Table 2.5.4-9). The structural acceptance criteria relating to stresses, strains, and deformations of foundation mats oF Category I structures are discussed in FSAR Sections 3.8.1.5, 3.8.3.5, 3.8.4.5., and 3.8.5.5. The Category I electrical and piping systems that are not supported on sound rock are designed to maintain system integrity based on design settlement (FSAR Section 3.8.5). The Main and Auxiliary Dams are to be performance monitored (FSAR Section 2.5.6.8). SHNPP will comply with the requirements of USNRC Reg. Guide 1;127, Rev'. 1, March 1978, "INSPECTION OF WATER"CONTROL STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" as stated in FSAR Section 1.8.
hKLH06
ATTACHNENT II WKLH06
Rev 2
'l~ ~BC R&Q
- T~ ~iGTZic."RX"G File uo AZ/'SA/A4~
FOR"f FOR R~ORTDtG PZ-BUZLTS Date +-l8-8~
~4ZON RARMS PROJECT Date or, As Bui1td-Ib'g/7 Pour 8. Date or Pour A A-Building: 4 4 L- ( LQG5.
2 oor Elevat" on: ~ As Shown A' As BuU.t AlfA Area Descript'on: AC /8 C4S.
As BuQ.t Desc iption: (Complete sketch must be at=ached) dcW n7r ~7 Wo~r ~H Roam Dumber: (Ef AppU.cable)
Zlevation: U other than flaor eIevatian. Field Book Ref. No. R:C.l'f5 P- - 0 pic a-ill ~g <<- >> M - isa Wj l -3 As Shown: GAIA As Built: A 4 Bgineer Party members: PZPC o Vs<co~ fJcr ~d P 1&5 c c= 5/ i ~aA8~
8AH~c R Wo 57EAv8 Hate: LC as built is partial and. should be noted as such and completed an a later date not to exceed (1) week after forms and obstruction are remaved. All elevat"ons and locations will be noted on as built sketch ~
and auy items out of tolerance shal1 be flagged and discussed with the appropriate par>.
Signature af Par~ Chier Dis~u~n: Technical Superintendent F.E Ff~e Document Control a, A~v,'112
~.Them~>>
Rev. 1 CAROLIM POWER 6 'LIGHT COMPARE Exhibt 4 a/so SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLAiVZ WP-25 BUILDING SETTL~~. MONITORING POB."l 8VII Cv i VI I 5 a84,. co Elev. Date Ref. Point App'va. Elev, Date Bef. Point App'vd ld-l'R
'19 Q l/p. od 239,.9.&s 214 .oo io -Z5' ask.s f 5o Zz
+968'o<
/3 5oR 7-$ 8 oY Pcc C4 Zt<.m QZ ll ~ 3 z34.545
~'-< aci Z3+.'jt 5 8a
'Rev. 1 CAROLINA POKER & LIGHT COMPARE Exhibit 4 1/SO S'rZQON HAiEIS RJCLDR POtvr.R PL.'VZ VP-25 BUILDING SETTLHKHT MONITORING PORN
~ o'nt 0 U~ c.ng U~< t i!
' ~
Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. :"lev. Da" e Ref. Point App'vd
, 95 MM9~
2)>'3
.9Qc be-R9 l lS 2,5555( ga 23!I.9~
+.2&
I
'1-28 BI~9~ 'Q io-zS I -i4 2,/5 p!, 8) ZB K! s 'ASS z 7-iS 34.9g5'34.'lt Z> 5.'l5! 'S< 5 Zl 5 (r.q Z943 45 Z)XQg ZZ0%65
)-l1 Zl5.Rg7 SZ.
N
Rev. 1 CAROLINA P04rR & LIGHT'CO.PAVI Exhf.bit 4 1/80 SHEARON HARRIS ÃJCLEAR POWiR PLANT MP,-25 I ~
y BUILDING SETTLE.Kt'T 'MONITORING FORM
? oin5 r'ui'c.'n~ '7,9., ~ V
.Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Date Ref. Point App'vd H9
- 25. L.
2>spa 10-'R9 2,l5~ 23~cs 215' z3%.9&5 ZI5 Alai'
/
Aoe Ra s5wdc lo-J7 15 53 'ei NA l Z+ 6 p- l7 I- l 7 gZ s94l ez. zan+ ss 15 'Z.
2~5 Z S4
hev./
CAROLINA POWR E LIGHT COMPANY Exhibit 4 SO' SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WP-25 I
~
SUILDING SETTL~NT MONITORING FORM Po'.-'.
i 190.0o
.Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd 8-26
%.'1
'9 10-29 MM4 0 ~.194 2'34'1'i 4~89 23~
2 8+'f65 I-i7 Z l5. l E)5.89+
h>av 8 10" l7 g l5. 234,8 66 r>5. &S4 ZZh. lv5 le.SS9 z3+.%45 7 l7 Zi 5.Roz. 8z. 29+. ibS lO Jfy z.
-Rev. 1 ' CAROLINA POKER & LIGHT CON'AaVl 'Exhibit 4 1/80 SHEARON 2~IS RJCLEAR POVER PLAVT VP-25 BUILDING SETTL~~WT MONITORING FORM Po'n
, ~y o
'1<9 3
.">>lev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Ej ev Date Ref. Point App'vd
'i-12 lo-R9 1
2'.369 03m
]o-)8-s18't. 'Bo ZS,q 4,S
) -17 I
Z3+'1 4&
la-Sl
)5. \ '8) 234.'1) S ss'8 sc z,sf.%) H Z)5Ã8 ) z,SA. L4s 7 )7 2.) S 998 az. ZSf;8<5
)o-) 6 2
215.~$ 3 2.39 545
Rev.
1/80' l CAROLIVA POWER 6 LIGET CO%'AX~
SHEEN P>>ARRIS ÃJCLEAR POWER PL~IT Exhibit '4 WP-25 I
~
3UILDIVG SETTLr~T .IOVLITORIVG POR1
<<g>> l A4>> ~ tr
~ <<~ ~
'V Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd 8-NW 2 h.982 2G
\
0 l-n-Sl L
4<< I) g)
No A IhlOT P hi~ A~ -l7-g4 8'Z "7-t7 8
lo-.l >
N A z-i -Zi 9
g3
CAROLINA PVWKR & L'Gmr J'v~a"Jr- Ez'Jibit 4 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER P~1T 4P-25 BUILDING SETTL~T.MONITORING POLL Po'nt v'os Ir
'kg v C %v I '4
~ ~W LBD2. cc Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Re . Point App'vd L,oi 2>L.o<
'"1-L'1
'19 Hot HcA d
lo -C5 Acc855 Hoz r4cc:
Zls "
Rev. 1 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMATE Exhibit 4
'/SO SFZAROH AMIS NUCLEAR, POWER PL<MT VP-25 BUILDING SETTLE".fEHT ~MONITORING PORf Po< ~ Qi ~
&14 w 1rii M m
~
Cc.>>dinat s .", 'i~84.ac
-E1ev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd
.olO 2'3%9<5 l .pcs 2l .cc 23'~
2$wR 2X .94
>MA~
2lB
.9L.
Z15.1 13 z3+ iGS 5.S i Z 3+.
Z39. t.5 1-18
- 14. 99 I ZZ+.5a 5 Zi .%8+ Z34.11o5 1-Z+
515l~oz. ~
8 Z.Z4. 8 45 Z1S.SSZ.
g-l7 3
Rev.
.l/80' l CAROLINA POVER & LIGHT COP ANY SHEARON MRRIS BOUCLE.CR. P04~R PLANT Exhibit WP-25 4
L BUILDING SETTLE. MONITORING PORN P&1 et,j fQ -~ I"--ne lQ t:nit 0 4'a 52>r .Cc ~~ 4 & o
""lev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Re;. Point App'vd lb'i09%~
234.
)d 59 C. 9 '.1 OL0.9
+ oS4o I ~L9 23+~> &
zZ+.pbbs Z3+.565 7 1g
- 0. Z5 '8l IO I Zc2 Z34 S5 4-S7 Z'I 0.590 z z.8+.%be 7-I7 8Z Z.34.% 4S z.9+9~ s i->+
83 23+%I 5
+ I4 Z10,$ 83
Rev. 1 'CAROLINA POLER & LiGEZ CO~ANY Exhibit 4 1/80 SH:"MON HARRTS NUCLEAR POD@.R'LY NP-25
~
~ ~
BUTLDl:NG SETTLMENi iafONITORHiG ."OR".!
ZIi~ 1 p s>> i ik Q ee .> RED.00
.Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. . Date Ref. Point Aop'vd 8-Q5 65l 55'~9)a 2 D 9 23%,9l:$
1.oG Io-ZS'O 2//.n3 5 83++~5 I t.pa Z34 v&
E.ll.oi 3 hlbT pic 1-18'Sl Z+"
11 Qz 3
85
0 Rex. l '/8'AROLINA Pph' & LIGHT S~ON HARRIS NUCLEAR PO4ER COMPAQ%
PL4VZ Exnibit 4 4P-25 BUILDING SETTL~T iLONITORING E'OR".f Uni. g w'Hta C 'V %1
~
i QC
-Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. ">>lev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
,oats '"lR ~E RC5' 14 'K9
.ca<
1 ~ 18 2(.oo '
'l-88
.02. 0 ZZ. &
zB+. ibG
%$ 4.oo'R Z,34'14 9 1-i8 Zlb.ox% gf 21 1-Z+
Z\4.ce8 QZ.
1 -17 Z.16. el t.
Z.S zh.ao1 83 Z 14,&W g3
I
,Rev.
/80' l' CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO%'ANY SHEARON ORRIS RJCLEAR POWER PLAVZ Exhibit WP-25 4
~ BUILDING SETTL~iT i ONITORING PORf 0 ~ ', 18~ w~ ('
C cd,.
PO1 pl 41 Co.-=na-es i Li. C I ~ ~ o N xmas l(-
Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. .
'Date Ref. Point App'vd lo-H 21599> l) 23 9 23 porn Io -C,5 AccMS. go 1 -11
=55. I
+>I-SI C
O>A 5&j5 C 7-1 $/
A - z.:g P
ZISP,S 4ÃbS
)-17 Z1551,1 gZ zan.fg5 Ki>.9 5 dz- 23'+9ss
>-Zl is; 51 83 z.z&.'tt 5
Cev. 1 1/80'
'AROLINA POVER 6 LIGHT COMAiVZ SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PObr.R PLAiVT Exhibit WP-25, 4
BUILDING SETTLE T;MONITORING "OR~!
Point
'Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd le-5c l9 94
.OCl '
$ -24 2l .ol6 2 b.oao 2S
/g ol3'- .945'Q~
i1 81 II
'z, t4.~w 2I6, 0 lZ- >3't&5 r.<4,.ooc '.
I Z.34; 165 Zlb.m 3 .9b Z.B+') 45 3 Z-99.'l45
Rev 1 CAROLINA POMiR & LIGHT COMATE ixhi'oit 4
'I/80' SHEARON FERRIS iVUCLEAR PO~r. PLANT NP>>25 BUILDIViG SETTL~ViT ".fOViITORIViG PORlt Elev. Date Ref. Po'nt App'vd. Elev. Date Ref'. Point Apo'vd 1 1l
.CCO 9 2E 9GS l-.9(.5
.D Q-28 0
IO -K Zls'. 9. I gib l -'L1 ZIS. i 4 I 234.%45 ll Z.l S. fa( 2.34.'i~ 5 lo.
I Vl Zl5.% ~
1 Zl5.t8Z. Z3+.545 Zl5.$ 4. ZSe. lt S to-(7 ZiS.97t'5.
8Z ~+v g5 1 S+
-7 83
CAROLINA POWER & 'LIGHT CO~PAi1Y Exhibit 4 l/8'0 SHEEN HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLAVT WP-25 BUILDIVG SETTLE.; MONITORING PORN
~ 1 ~ . 1 4 ig ~ 1 9
Cc.-~" nates N )go,~g v1 o
Jill, il
-Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. :>>lev. Date Re . Point Apo'vd
. 6'lC C'23'c c". 3'k H.24
.00 'R49c;5 2 ~ cc 234.caw to-zS zest ao z3 .965 l -1'7 z~o 5 Ql 234 ~a&
Z l. I Z30. 45
'r-i8' IP,5$ ~ Ie-sl Sl Z.34 R,b5 I Sf L + l4o5 h-c1 ll eZ3 8L 1-l7 ZI I.OIq 6 Z. ZZ~ f65
)0-Il 2 ZIt.o Z. ZZ+ls5
>->4 ZL .OI 3 Z8+. l45 q-) 4 2)).oz.b 6 Z
kev. 1
' 'AROLlM POWER 6 LTGHT CO~hi',Z Exhibit 4, 1/80 S'a~&ON MAIS NUCLEAR POWER PLA4T WP-25
~
I ~ BUILDING SETTLr~bT MONZTORlNG E'OR"f Po'n- .P 'Uni t f
~~ V Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. , Date Ref. Point App'vd 2K .0 '~
+-24 S+-SC5'm+.
2'>6 .o 3g g" 2ll.GS3 2s. 5 su<<85 I-17 8 f.OZM 1 sl
'Zl .OZo ail,a>7 Z,3~St 6 Zll'.ohio ? 4
+045 w.stol Z I l.~8 234.R 4 5 23 .9 ZJLa
CAROLINA.POWER & LIGHT COMPAVl'HEARON Exhibit 4 ORRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WP-25 BUILDING SETTL~ MONITORING PORE Jog Nl Ccs ~a
%Pl VV + 5C
-Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Eleve Date Ref. PointI Aop'vd
\-2.g 2,00 sa-Z5
'bo Z 3+,
as R3
-)\
Sl o" Sc.
uo~ A 7 tS'9 Z> .
Zl5.8 l'.
1-l7 lO-l7 g3+. s5 Z)g ~775 Z.3+.'ll 5 g~ 1 Ji ZI51 o .83
Me+. 1 .'CAROLS POWER & LXGHT COP-'~NY Exhi'oit 4
',1/80 SHEARON HARRIS KJCLEAR POLvER PLATE 'P<<25 BUTLDDIG SETTLEMENT;LONTTORTNG POR."$
?o't BUL1cin>> Qg 4v. i %1 l'80(. QG ~ ~ o E1ev. Date Ref. Point App 'vd. Elev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd
'1-l9 l
2LS. l io Zl5qa+
js'lS.%17 Z3+;R~ &
z s.q1s Z3 .5l 5 Zl5. 1 23 4 zg<
(-2<
z.<5 F72 Z 1->7 z.
lo-57 BZ.
l -Xo 8
hev. CAROLINA POW""R cc LIGHT COiPAVZ Exhibit 4 1'/80 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POMER PLAzVT WP-25
~ ~
BUILDING SETTL~NT MONITORING PORf V ~~ V CCNW Un' !2
+~~~i ~ rv geS
~ 1~~~' . 'ZC g
~ V
'lQ2 .OC"
.Kiev. Date Ref. Po'nt App'vd. ey ~ Date Ref. Point App'vd lo-!9 Zl5.%"lI lail 5 Z3 . 49 1-i8 Z SRl 5 'Sl 23+. lks5 A+4. 5 i-?0 Z15. l 1t Z Z8+ le@
Zl 5, lbS Z Sh.Z6S l -17 2.l .R7 Z Z,3+.5 4 5 Z.9h:9 65 Z.L5
~ ~1 l 83
Rev. 1 CAROLINA POhrR & LiGHT COHPV'Y Exhibit 4
'/80 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WP-25
~ ~ BUILDING SETTL~T NONITORLXG PORN
?Oint C PV Qt4'
~
Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
'1-lg 2 l5,. Ocg gc
)y -i$
Z lb.Ooq
? is.'l %1 ? 3$. lg5 ZiSA'17 Z9484 5
<o-sl
'Ql 15."i'l~ 9Z Z.B W. i@5 Ei 5.'1'15 Z34.%i S 1-i7
'li.oo3 Sz- Z.B+.Rs 5
/8-1 L ZI5. Jg4 B> zaH6S 1 70 z>sh 5 3 K8+. t4 2.15. 9 Z.35. b
Rev. I CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY P~IS NUCLE.M POWER PLANT Exh'ibit 4 1/80' SHEARON
~
BUILDING SETTLEYKNT HOilITORIHG POR."f WP-25'ol
~i Cc tM CA V )%I4 H V
-Elev. Date Ref'. Point App 'vd. Elev. Date Ref, PO3.nt App vd la- i&
C lg, i3 c Z9%045 Z,lb,OO l -2,5 iSl
'i
\0-'8 z.is.Vi3
><.co7 Z)6.COB
Rev. 1 CAROLINA P04:.R a LiGHT CO~iAVl Exhibit 1/80 SIMON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWiR PL43T 4P-25 BUILDING SETTLc .ENT HONITORXNG POR."$
fta1 4 iC v V Co~~ 'w ~ c %.45!
Date Ref. Point App'vd. O v Date Ref'. Point App'vd Elev. ~
lo- <8-Z.1L.oo I '<o Z.IS.59 z Zl 5.'1'9 3 Z.l 4.ooz.
~
8 ssa6L go- -8 l 2K'. 9S
?3+9s5
)-2.0 3
Z) 5S'i5 8>
Rev. 1 CAROLINA PO4cR 6 LIGHT CO~ANY Exhibit I/80' SHEARON HARRIS NUCL~~ POKER PLANT vp-25
~
\ ~ SETTLMZNT i~LONITORING POR."f 'UILDING Qo1 6
'i92 AA'I4 f, v V
~h!l 1 Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. ~~1
= ev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
'1-L9 2tSRS eo pJoV ld-i8.
$ d l4 z.is8 L Z3+,Q b5 l5. 5 ZB .R4 Zl5 rsg Z9'h 94
Rev. l CAROLINA POWrR & LIGHT CO.PAVE SHEARON FERRIS NUCLEAR POWER .PLANT Exhibit A7-25 4
L~
'./80'
~
~
~ BUILDING SET MONITORING PORN Unit VVANr~ V
~ v l l l.. 6'2
.Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd 0 2 lo-ie-Z,i~.'i l+ Z h+.54K ZiS. ibS z3+Ra s Zl&.RCZ 1 -2,5 2.>5.1bl 2.3 ~. b
]0-i1
'el 2.34,%b 5 Cia'. bS Z . 5 K>5,f16 ZAS.
I 70 Z15Ãl Z- 83 83
0 0
\
Rev.
I/8O l ' CAROLINA PO4r.R SHEARON HARRIS
& LIGHT 'COMPANY NUCLEM POViR PLAINT Exhibit W2-25 4
BUILDING 'ETTLE MONITORING POL~i
?o'nt g ', 2L '1 Hi s-
~
Un't
".-. tes
.Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. El~v Date Ref. Point App'vd 2.'1 .oo 2.1 } .C'CG Zis.'16 28+ 45 Z15. Rl 234. g Z(58 5 Z.i5~iS z36.lag 2i5.%4 iO-'Lb 515.$ et.
I+
ZL5 5 93 ZB+ ~45 2,)K 581
'Rev. 1~ CAROLINA POWER '& LIGHT COY-AVl Exhibit 4
- '/80 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POVER PLANT WP-25
~
~ ~
~
BUILDING SETTLc~T MONITORING POR."!
j f7~ v 't
~ 4V vsPgv
-Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Eleve Ref. Point App'vd Go 2S4.9<<
Z.l5 I,'
IC~LG ZlS Z5 3i;(s 5 ZlS9Z.4 1-l8 r.<Q3o I Ql lO"t8
)-? +
l '5 z.
4-ll 5.'%S'>5.
lZS +Z.
1->8 ZIS.C 3l z.
so -'I'l CL5. Z2. 2 1-~
- 5. 4 9
" CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COiiPA.'K Rev. 1 Exhibit 4 1/80 SHE<RON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLAiNT WP-25
~ ~ ~
BUILDING SETTL~NT MONITORING PORN Qoj ~L ~V JL Vile vvQVltw 1 Vl v~S
. C- i 4 ~ VI eve Date Ref. Point App'vd. ~1ev ~ Date Ref'. Point App'vd "l - l9 iC-25 16 2 ~@5'
-l'7 z.BsÃ5a 8l Z.31. lee 4- i el 1 ~
C pe Ac a )-I 8 Ja~ l ZR. Z q-sS lo-)7 835'9 8~
>-Z.t Z35, vo 83 3
Rev. 1 > C.MOLT'O4ER & LEGi'.T CO%'AGONY Exhi'oit 4
- 1/80 SncARON HARRiS NUCLEAR POKER PL.44T MP-25
~ ' ~ ~
~
BUELDING SETTLE . 'AONTTORING FOR~f
~ILl '
~ z<~ Q
~ ) ~ %~~
C" "'"."= ~ n~ Q
'i JK 8.56 lev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd 2 SR 284-.Re p'lOT c I-8I
'l0T cc 1 "Z54 h~o~Pc gate 10- - I
~ 8z z,~S'.le'I 8~3+
235 S1> z94,$ b5 Xl 3s.R z 8>
l4 ZZS ZS e 3 Z.SO.S1.
0
r CAROL&i'A POL>>ER & LIGHT COB'AiXY 1
Exhioit 4 l/8O ' '
SHEERS HARRIS %CLBZ POWER ?L~NT VP-25 BUTLDENG SETTL. HhT ."fONITOR1NG PORN r>>
Po't Qt j 1 r rr Ur Cc.-d'.-.at s Y; i%r w e7~r a
~
Q
'-Kiev.
Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. , Date Ref. Point App'vd
<o-U'fO zaa,o>i 1-<8
~3 oiz ~
I 2 3't% 5 ro-i8 Z 4 z. e~ z~8.%b&
Z8i .@ZAN ZB<i 015 z.a%.'t ss 1- L8 Z,34.co'l'K ZS4.%ST l0~'ll Mb.~ ez. 59+96 2 3 6.Q) l 83 Z3C.oIO
'Rev<< I CAROLINA POVER 6 LIGHT CO%'ANY Exhibit <
'/sc ., S~RON HARRIS NUCLEUS P04'rR PLANT VP-25 BUILDiNG SETTLE.; T MONITORING F'OR~!
P int d kU~Q Un' !(
Co<<<<A <<<<\ 'A lg 7<<<<
~ 'v v <<I .~c .. o
-Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Z'1 a V~ Date Ref. Point App'vd 2 4.9bS'"
io Z,'7 Z6095 + 8'v + IC,S zm'IS+ ~
81 E~%5l a-8
<<3.~. L 5 Z. ~
P f Z&HR4 pro 1<.184 Z5'8C Z 8+.Ab5 Z.t o.'1 03 ta-l7 8K.
ZbO Z9+.94 5 9->7 3
Rev. 1 CAROLINA.POLr R & LIGHT CO~ANY ExhS.bit 4
/80 S~~ON ma~IS WCLZAR POWER Pr WI MP-25
~ ~
e ~
BUILDING Si":'~L~T. MONITORING PORGY<
Pol'ht 0 ~lt~ld~w'5 s U~i gj Co~( r s gee. lu hl. a Acd'I In=o
."-lev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. "-3.ev. Date Ref. Point App'vd 8o >34.9r. ~
Ig-Z j
- z. +9sS z.3p 5&5'(d.
y4 Z8+0~
g/
'l
~
le-4
)-Z5 Z ao.1'lE ZSW S4 5 w -i8 Zoo.8~5 ~Z- raw,as 5 a-i8 240'l34 St.
le )7 gZ l 24 S Za+ l Q~)7 83 ZS9 lb' I
I
0 Rev. CAROLS" POh~R & LIGHT CO&'ANY Exhibit 4 l/8C' 'HARON HARRiS i4UCL:"M POWER PI 4VZ hP-25 BUILDiilG SETTLE; ifOhXTORING POR>!
psi ~t /p l.~ e A4H V KC un't 0 C"r""-" es ~'
" ~i3 2.'5.
-Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
'l -'L9 ZGI.Oculo
~a. 0~)9 'Ho Z fO Z.g
'So Zm.985 z. 5+ 8(o5 4 lZ.
2 3 8) <>%. <o5 2.so. 9 10 )8 Z.mehl 6< Q+ 5
<-ZS z za+ 5a5 4-t8 ZL~. l5b 8Z q -i8 Z4o.R 8z
)o-)?
9Z 83 q- f7 2&v I 5 85 ~+.'t 45
P Xev.
1/80' l' CAROLHaA POWER ~ LIGZZ CO%'GVZ SHARON HARRTS ÃJCLEAR POWER PL4VE'xhibit MP-25 4
I ~
~ ~ ~ BUILDEhG SETTLZKHT i~LONITORTbG POMf
+oi ~z, 0 ~ 1~i~ t iL vaIHQ I + g'~
I, Q ~>>W Cv v ' Hg v 5C ~ I I w w /. >~~
hv ~ 0 Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd
'1- L9 80 2'34.
Zdo /7 c~A 7Q 4-tl 8>
'7-ZS zen 1
)
Lo-8 24Q'go gl l-Z5 ZGa&lz I z.
z( oRl 8 z>tlat 5 240. 44 Zsoq gg gQ 83 Z3 .545 J7 ZS .9L
I~
Rev. I CAROLS POLr,R & LIGHT CON'A.Z Kxhibi I/80', SHFKROH HARRIS NUCLEAR PO~~ PLANT NP-25 BUILDING SrTTL~ MONITORING PORi QA1 v 'N
~4 tf =- --' ~
Add" " o Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. ev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
! Ro,i<h q-!8 IRo ag io-4 IRO,(3 !
550.H.'I LM.%>5 e-! 8
!qo9< $Z Z3<. l!'5 q -!8 8W
1/80'I
'ev. 1 S~ON CAROLS iNILDTNG
. c'..~:P POk~r.R & LiGHT COHPAÃY HAMXS NUCL""M PO~iZ PLANT SETTL~T HONTTORING FOR~<
~
DL~ M~
~ ~
y Whl~MQw Urit 0 Exhibit VP-25 4
Ccrdinates N to~~,oo A'gpt t, o j V N <+9~,co
.Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. E1ev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd l-zl.
- o. o 1 2%~.Q Z. 3 't ~i 4 5 1-t8
'gl io-t4 SL P-i8 i%a,>O8 gZ NIA Sz-cd' /o-J-
0 RBV ~ L i/SO',.
CAROLS SHZCROH %<PRIS NUCL~R POh'~R PL.CVZ BUILDING SFTTL~iNT if04a'ITORIBG FOR~'xhibit POhER & LIGHT CO%'RNY WP-25 4
Pc'n 0 Q 7 Co."d'.. tes .'l Acd ' 'nfo
.EIev. Date Ref. Point Aop'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
\-28 h o '51 p-\v Ca g 53~3 ~5
)-4 8> 2,3%.54 LO-4
>So,i%6 z3+.%t s
%-$ o q-i7 QZ q-)S HJA QZ W7 I ainus o v'Z Jn - z
'I II I
'ev. CAROLIM POL~i.R & LIGHT COP ANY Exhibit 4 1/80 ~ SHr <RON HES NUCLEAR POWER PLAZA WP-25 BUILDING SETTLE; MONITORING r OR."f P-"'nt
': Uq4 4 g't 3
IP ) Q CQ'Hd 4 Th~ +$ Qt I ow.cc Add n; o Elev. Date Ref, ?oint App'vd. Date Ref. Point App'vd l -2,8 lRO. s) 2ZWP g l ic.>55 Z.8+ 9 c 5 q-<8
>go. Lgc '6i iP-4 Ao.KS L 8<
l-3o SL ZSWS<5
t lt Rev. l CAROLINA POVc,R & LiGHT CO%'ANY SWOON HARRiS NUCL~M POKER PLANT Bchibi i/8O VP-25 3UILDENG SZTTL~T HONZTORXNG FOR."<
D~Q ~1 g f
o Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Kiev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd l-2$
.Ol.
'.~
(.04 I <>4.8a5 1-48 23(,0 1 I 34. e5
)o-i5 ZS>.OS% 8 ~o~
)a 3Q sz-9-i8 H A ez Z-l8 231.O55 8Z r.39.545 p/g~w ~ PDr&TS bZ>CPO I -Bz.
.Rev CAROLINA POLr.R 6 LTGPT CO~APE Exhibit 4
'/80 '
~
~
S~ON HAMXS ÃJCLE.<R. PONER PL&iT VP>>25 SETTL~
~ ~
BUTLDXNG MONTTORIi1G FOR."f Poh~it ~r B~" -'din~ Mz=e~ 5~ Un'",~) 2 )~:+'l
'A t) q~@ o
~
Eyev. Date Ref. Point APP'vd. E3.ev. Date Ref. Point App'vd 1-28 YO I 2%4.Sas Q-'L 4 q-i8 Z. 3l:>io sg (
(0-aG z.
'Rev ~ CAROLINA POVER,& LIGHT CO~VlY Exhibit 4 j/80' J SK'-MON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER NP-25 PLAÃI'UILDING SETTL~cr..'T MONITORING PORN Add'1 4 Rp Qas 8 Ec Gov g+ r ~H gage,H-Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
\-5g Si CBI. ICQ nlT bcCZ 8 84 c- 7- s8 "Sl r~M
34,
1/80'AROLINA
'Rev. 1 S~ON POL~c,R 6 LIGHT CO%'ANY FC<RES NUCLEAR POhrR PLANT Exhibit MP-25 4
BUZLDTNG SETTL~~.; MONTTORVilG PORTAL Point fr Bui-din~ <~ <-=g Q$ ~ Unit g,l,2,~,+
Ekev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd i
Z, 5I:it@ z.B+8e6 l-s8
~t. l l'7 'gl 2.34.8<5 io-ls mal. ll> 9l Z8+. ASS
)~90
'QZ gZ l-(8
'8z Agog >Yp b2':oa Co- - z
Rev. CAROLS POhc.R & LXGEZ CO~.~MY Exhibit 1/80 S!&ARON HARRXS NUCL. <R PO4aR PLANT VP-25 BUXLDXNG SETTL~ MaONXTORXNG POR"3 a o~n't !P jjn. ~ ik l) ~+)5 J~
..c ' Tn-.
2> U.b,r.n . o
.Elev. Date Ref. Point App vdo ">>Xev. Date Ref. Point App'vd 24o.
z 3%.%45 ZS A%$ 7 I '8l (O-l8 8
5ka b8 'gZ Z,S5. ~4$
4-i9 2sa,&8 9< Z9+.0 45 q-<8 ZLa QZ @3 0,'t~S J~l7
~z. ZS+'3 b S C3+%45
}I I "Rev. 1 POhr.R & LIGHT CO%'AXY Exhibi" 4 CAROLINA 1/80 S~RON HARRIS %iJCLEAR PO~ER PLANT VP-25 BUILDING SETTL~T MONITORING EORM Do'er')
~d~:...
'>> r1 7~a o
\ .,cc Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. , Eleve Date Ref. Point -
Apo'vd
\ -SG l
q-xX at l.SS"1 Ss Z30.5bS q-zS 26'.558 '8 t Z9 .5~5 io-4 Zbl.555 e i 286.S~S i' -ZS Z41.558 Z3%8<5 q-)S 2 el,560 gZ. z8+5 b 5 1 -i8 Z.el.F51 9% Z.8+.5s 5 IO 17 Zgl. 55~ ,~Z, l -l'l 24 543 83
l Reve CAROLS POWER & LiGHT CON'Ah'Y hibit 4
/80
~
SiZ.MON HARRiS ÃiCL~ POWER PLATE M'-25
~
BUILDLNG SEZZL~r".'7 .fObITORI'BG PORN S'il 'in- (', ~ ) g, Qn'" ..;l ) >.2 Co. cinates N Add'l:n=o
.Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd 1- RS 2- .2. I 27,4.9t .-
b2.Lloyd Z~Z..Zbb l~
~~ZZ51 8i C3+R~
AA w 6-Sz-4-i8 Z&Z.Z&l 82. z8< 5b5 7>> hJ S< ~.RbS lo- j7 2Z+~aS
>-11 t4Z, Lag 3
+ 17 ZCZ.zc1 89 Z3+.5t.5
e, s
) ~
V Rev.
l(aa l CAROLHIA PO4~R & LIGHT COMAS' SHARON HAP%IS %/CLEFT% PO4iR Exhibit 4 PLAVl'UILDING VP-25 SETTLE.. MONITORING FOR~<
Point !~ BU'dLn~ un.=!J <<2 I
Acc'1 Info
.Kiev. Date Ref. Point APP'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd l -<8 Slo
? z34.%s 5 51.5'5l.
7.Z,5 5th ~
~g 25 .'F44
~7.5)')
z.34.5sS hI 83
I 'I
Rev.'! CAROLEbA POhER 6 LZGFZ CO~APL'~ON Pxhibit 4 80, MKRiS NUCL~R POkr.R PLAÃT WP-25 3UILDiNG SE'ZTL~ 'AObTTORTBG PORN
~ o't d 4-g it{i,~ie r ( C Cordinates 7 i~gq,@o Taio Kiev, Date Ref. Point App'vd. Kiev. . Date Ref. Point App'vd 1-~e 6'i 2%4.9C,.-
2b3 91 St 2 36%a5 q-2.S
<63.51 7 zan.a<5 zan.'t7 4 z,a+Sos Zb3.51 9 Z.34.%45 lo i7 Z~~7 ~Z 23~++
3 Z~+845
Rev, CAROLINA POP:-R & LTGHT CO%'ANY 3.
S~~ON EQHiS Exhibit 4
~)SO... NUCLEAR POMZR PL%ST NP-25
~ ..0 BUILDING SETTL~T ."!O¹TORDlG FOR~i
'Dwi v r I wv BuS 1Q1N U..t l 2,%;+
f3 Cordina'- s N Add'1 info Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd 22 4.
- 4. A.
%42', 'gl i-Z,5
.a>5 z.
8Z 7-i8 7 sZ.. o34 gZ. z.345v5 la-l7 ghee O~ ~Z, Z,3~4'7 ~
28%'I 5
+ )7 2hz o97 89 Z3 .04
0 ~ . ~
CAROLS'ORE & LEG.Z CO~AX~ Exn bXc 4 SHZCRON i'<~R S tUCL". <R PO4.3. PLANT VP-25 SUZLDl:NG Si~~~~ ~Ops'lTORL~tG . ORx(
<<~4
~ V ~rV jj
~
I
~ 0 < i(l'Q Oa'e Ref. Point App vdi Ref. Point: App 'vd Qi 1+
\
5iA/3< ') -Z5 0 l8.f3f
!O-A
+Z, l-l5 s
0- l7 9 Z99.$ 6
1 II
'.ev. 1 CAROLINA POKER' LIGHT CON'A'.K Exhibit 4
./80 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT MP-25
~ ~
BUILDING SETTLEMENT MONITORING FORM Po'nt 8 Buildin> e 544'S 'nit Info i'dd'1 Elev. ~ Date Ref, Point App'vd. Kiev.. Date Ref. Point App'vd LO- n 8Z 834 i45
\
b'av. 1 CAROLINA POhr.R & LIGHT CON'ARLY Exhibit 4
- /80 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT MP<<25 BUILDING SETTLE~ MONITORING FORM Point 8 ~Z. ~' Unit jj Co. dinar.es N Z.q~.g~ Add'1 Info Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. , Date Ref. Point App'vd fo-l1 Zt s.3H 2 t-~
243. 44 3 Z"9+.'les
+-)7 63951 89 ~3%.Sa5
.eve 1 CAROLINA POh'ER & LIGHT'OMPAXED Exhibit 4
/80 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLVVZ WP-25
~ C.
BUILDING SETTLEMENT MONITORING FORM Po'nt 8 Sg i Cordinates N iso.c-l Add'1 Info W I+Rz.o Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd to->1 ZsZ. !t8 SZ 945 5 3 2.9,8 5 g~)
CAROLINA POWER 6 LIGHT CO%'ANY Exhibit 4
'/80 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WP-25,
~ I BUILDING SETTLRKNT MONITORING PORM Point 8 5+ Buildin~ eSQ/ wg Un' (P Add'1 Info 1+89. 5 Date Ref. Point App'vd. Elev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
CAROLINA POVER & LIGHT CO%'A"iY Exhibit 4 SHZARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POMR P~VZ NP-25 BUILDING SETTLEMENT MONETORlNG FORM Point 9 5g BUildin~ ~5M Un't 0 Cordinates N +S. o Add'1 info N l5go,t3
- Elev. Date Ref, Point App'vd. Kiev. Date Ref. Point App'vd
'ZbZ.'tb ZaZ. I s) Z-5 .545
lj>> ) Ie