ML17341B523

Containment Structure Post-Tensioning Sys:Tenth-Yr Surveillance.

ML17341B523
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	07/31/1982
From:	Kimberly Green, Lee K BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML17341B522	List: ML17341B521 ML17341B523
References
NUDOCS 8212170276
Download: ML17341B523 (167)

Text

FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST>>TENSIONING SYSTEM TENTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION By:

Gaithersburg, Maryland K Greene July 1982 Approved:

K. Y. Lee 5 <<,. '//.,

Chief Civil Engineer Gaithersburg Power Division 82f2fz0276 82f 203 PDR ADOCK 050002SO PDR IIEI,II@TQRY MI',KET FILE I'08'

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS 2.1 Summary 2.2 Conclusions 3.0 GENERAL 4.0 SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES 4.1 Sheath Filler

'.2 End Anchorage Assemblies 5.0 'ETENSIONING AND WIRE INSPECTION 5.1 Tendon Lift-Off Forces 5.2 Wire Inspection 5.3 Discontinuous Wires 6.0 RETENSIONING AND SHEATH. FILLER INSTALLATION

. 6.1 Retensioning 6.2 Sheath Filler Installation 7.0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7.1 Wire Testing 7.1.1 Specimen Selection and Preparation 7.1.2 Test Procedure 7.1.3 Test Equipment 7.1.4 Test Results 7.1.4.1 Yield Strength 7.1.4.2 Ultimate Strength

7.1.4.3 Elongation 7.1.4.4 Fracture Characteristics 7.2 Analysis of Sheath Filler 7.2.1 Specimen Preparation 7.'2. 2 Test Procedures 7.2.3 Test Results 8.0 'ECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Presence of Water in Vertical Tendon Pits 8.2 Pitting of Wires in Vertical Tendons 8.3 Pitting of Buttonheads ATTACHED PROCEDURE 5177-187-CP-1 Tendon Surveillance Procedure for Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System Unit 3 (Tenth-Year Surveillance),

Rev. 5 APPENDICES A ,End Anchorage Inspection Data Sheet B Wire Inspection Data Sheets C Results of Laboratory Testing of Wire Samples D Results of Laboratory Analysis of Sheath Filler E Testing Machine Calibration Report

h LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 3-1 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND 11 IDENTIFICATION 5-1 DOME TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE 12 LIFT-OFF FORCE VERSUS TIME 5-2 HORIZONTAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED 13 WIRE LIFT-OFF FORCE VERSUS TIME 5-3 VERTICAL TENDON AVERAGE NORMALIZED WIRE 14 LIFT-OFF FORCE VERSUS TIME

LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE 4-1

SUMMARY

OF DATA - SHEATH FILLER AND END 15 ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES 5-1

SUMMARY

OF DATA - DETENSIONING AND WIRE 16 INSPECTION 5-2 NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON 17 LIFT-OFF FORCES 6-1

SUMMARY

OF DATA >> RETENSIONING AND SHEATH 18 FILLER INSTALLATION 7-1 WIRE TEST RESULTS . 19

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The tendon surveillance program is a systematic means of assessing the continued quality of the post-tensioning system for the containment structure.

It provides a measure of confidence in the condition and 'functional capability of the system and an opportunity for timely corrective actions should adverse conditions, such as progressive corrosion, be detected.

The tenth-year tendon surveillance for the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 containment structure consisted of the physical inspection of nine tendons as described in Technical Specification, Section 4.4.5. The tendons inspected were 62H18, 42H70, 64H50, 23V1, 45V7, 61Vl, 1D53, 2D28, and 3D28.

During the current inspection, it was determined that'endon 64H51 (the tendon listed in Technical Specification, Section 4.4.5) had not been surveyed during any of the previous surveillances. On further investigation, it was found that tendon 64H50 had been surveyed during the previous surveillances, and had been incorrectly identified as tendon 64H51 in the fifth-year tendon surveillance report. It was therefore decided that tendon 64H50 would be

'inspected, since this was the tendon which had been surveyed'uring previous surveillances.

2.0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS 2.1 Summary This report covers the tenth-year tendon surveillance for the post-tensioning system of the Unit 3 containment structure at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant. The surveillance was started in January 1982 and was completed in March 1982.

The lift-off forces in all surveillance tendons were within the range of the predicted design values, taking into account the 1'osses of .prestress due. to wire relaxation, concrete creep and shrinkage, and the initial elastic structural deformation.

The load-bearing components'f the end anchorage assemblies were found to be in good condition with no adverse conditions such as excessive corrosion and cracking. Some of the washer faces appeared to have hammer marks which probably resulted from an attempt to separate buttonheads from washers during the initial installation of the tendons or during one of the previous surveillances; however, these marks do not constitute an adverse impact on the structural integrity of the washers. Buttonheads were in good condition with some traces of visible oxidation. No discontinuous wire was found on any of the tendons inspected.

Wires which were removed from the horizontal and dome tendons for physical testing were found to be in excellent condition. The wire removed from vertical tendon 45V7 had visible signs of oxidation and pitting. This condition of the vertical wire is consistent with that obtained during the fifth-year surveillance. It is possible that some water leaked through the cover plate into the tendon pit located at the top of the dome, and eventually made its way into the tendon sheaths (see recommendations, paragraph 8.1).

In the mechanical testing of the removed tendon wires, no significant change was detected in the physical properties regarding the yield stress, ultimate strength, and percentage of elongation of the wires since the initial acceptance tests.

No presence of water or abnormal discoloration was observed in any of the tendon sheath filler, except for sheath filler in one of the vertical tendons (61Vl). The sheath filler in this vertical tendon containe'd some water, and the color of the. filler in the vicinity of the water had changed to light brown; however, laboratory analysis of the filler samples obtained from each surveillance tendon showed that the. content of water, chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides was well within the acceptable limits.

There was no sheath filler leakage from any of the grease caps inspected, except for vertical tendon 61V1. The pit for this vertical tendon contained 4 inches of water. The rubber gaskets of both the tendons (61V1 and 61V2) in this pit were cracked, and the grease caps were substantially corroded. The water in the pit indicated the presence of sheath filler which apparently seeped through cracked gaskets'rom the tendon caps.

Corrective action was taken to prevent recurrence of water. leakage into the pit's containing tendons 61V1 and 61V2. The'corrective action was as follows:

a. The tendon pit was drained of water.

b. Tendons 61Vl and 61V2 were drained of sheath filler and water, then regreased by being pumped full of sheath filler.

C~ The filler caps were replaced with better caps, and the gaskets and copper washers were replaced with new gaskets and washers; the caps were installed with new nuts.

filler

d. The outsides of the filler caps were coated with sheath filler.

t

e. The checkered plate pit cover"was reinstalled over a silicone rubber.

caulking compound placed to provide a water seal.

2.2 Conclusions Based on the inspection and tests described herein, it is concluded that the post-tensioning system in the Unit 3 containment structure at the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant is in satisfactory condition and that the stress levels are within predicted values.

3.0 GENERAL The tenth-year tendon surveillance of the Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 containment structure pose,-tensioning system began in January 1982, 44 years after the completion of the fifth-year surveillance in August 1977.

The tenth-year tendon surveillance consisted of the following:

a. Visual and laboratory examination of sheath filler

b. Inspection of anchorage assemblies for deleterious conditions,'uch as corrosion, cracking, missing wires, and split buttonheads

c. Measurement of shim dimensions to determine tendon lift-off elongations

d. Measurement of tend'on lift-off forces.

e. Measurement of tendon elongations at 80 percent of the minimum ultimate strength of wires

f. Detensioning of tendons and checking of wire continuity by visual examination

g. Removal of one wire from each of three preselected tendons for inspection and testing

h. Retensioning of tendons to lift-off forces obtained in item d and measurement of the corresponding elong'ations

i. 'isual inspection "of removed tendon wires for corrosion, pitting; and other deleterious conditions Testing of samples obtained from removed tendon wires for yield strength, ultimate strength, and percentage of elongation at ultimate strength

k. Evaluation of surveillance data and test results to assess the general condition of the post-tensioning system, considering the time-dependent factors such as prestress losses and corrosion The work was performed in accordance with the attached Pracedure 5177-187-CP-1, Surveillance Procedure for Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System (Tenth-Year Surveillance) for Turkey Point Unit 3.

I e

The locations and identifications of the dome, vertical, and horizontal surveillance tendons are shown in Figure 3-1.

4.0 SHEATH FILLER AND END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES The results of the field inspection and laboratory analysis of the sheath filler and the visual examination of the end anchorage assemblies are summarized in Table 4-1.

4.1 Sheath Filler Two samples of the filler were removed from each of the surveillance tendons and visually examined. With one exception (tendon 61V1), all of the samples taken were dark brown, indicating the lack of water or impurities that may cause discoloration. The sample taken from one of the vertical tendons (61V1) was dark brown mixed with light brown, indicating the presence of some water.

4.2 End Anchorage Assemblies The end anchorage assemblies of the surveillance tendons were examined and found to be in satisfactory condition. Buttonheads were found to be in their proper position. No splitting of buttonheads was observed. Some of the buttonheads showed visible oxidation. Also, some pitting was observed on the buttonheads for tendon 1D53. A comparison with the fifth-year surveillance data shows that this pitting had existed previously and that the amount and level of pitting has not progressed significantly.

/

Mill scales and minor corrosion were noted on the mill-stock surfaces of the shims and the bearing plates. Surfaces cut during fabrication of the anchorage components showed slight spotty reddish discoloration. The corrosion levels of some of the shims,,bearing plates, and stress washers showed an increase from Level 1 to Level 2. Some of the shims for tendon 3D28 (near buttress 6) showed slight pitting.. The amount of corrosion found was not considered excessive.

The end anchorage inspection 'data are included in the report as Appendix A.

5'.0. DETENSIONIHG AND WIRE INSPECTION Data obtained during detensioning and wire inspection are shown in Table 5-1.

5.1 Tendon Lift-Off Forces The lift-off forces obtained from the tendons during detensioning indicated that prestress losses had not exceeded the predicted design values.

The long term (40-year duration) predictions of the normalized wire lift-off forces in the surveilla'nce tendons are shown giaphically in Figures 5-1..

through 5-3. These predictions had taken into account the prestress losses due to wire relaxation and concrete creep and shrinkage. These curves provide only an estimated trend in the pr'estress losses, and are used as a means for comparison with the trend of the actual average prestress losses.

The minimum effective design prestress is the required average force per wire at the end of 40 years, including the effects of wire relaxation and concrete creep and shrinkage.

Calculations for the predicted prestress losses are as follows:

a. Initial wire force (Fi) based on a wire stress of 0.70 f's:

Fi 0.70 f's x As 0.70 x 240 x 0.049 8.25 kips/wire where f's ultimate strength of wire A ~

s area of wire

b. Wire force at 40 years (F40) due to wire relaxation and concrete creep and shrinkage:

The prestress loss at the end of 40 years due to wire relaxation and concrete creep and shrinkage is estimated to be 34.7 ksi (see FSAR

'Section 5.1.4.4). This value is applicable to all dome, horizontal, and vertical tendons.

~," F pl .

' x.As 34.7 34.7 x 0.049 1.70 kips/wire where F pl

~ prestress loss at 40 years

.The minimum effective design prestress is the predicted average wire force after 40 years.

40 i pl 8.25 - 1.70

~ 6.55 kips/wire In order to compare the actual average prestress losses with predicted values, it was necessary that the wire lift-off forces, from the surveillance data, be normalized to account for the initial structural deformations (which are a function of the post-tensioning sequences), the deviations of initial lift-off forces from-the specified value of 0.70 f's, and the changes in lift-off forces resulting from tendon surveillance operations, such as reshimming and wire removal. These normalized wire lift-off forces were then superimposed on the appropriate curves shown on Figures 5-1 through 5-3, providing a comparison between the predicted values and the actual forces at the time of tendon surveillance.

For future convenience, the normalizing factors and the normalized lift-off force for each surveillance tendon for the tenth-year tendon surveillance are listed in Table 5-2.

Formulas for calculating the normalizing factors are given in attached Procedure 5177-187>>CP-l.

5.'2 Wire Inspection The results of inspection of each tendon wire removed for inspection are shown in Appendix B.

Wires removed from the horizontal and dome tendons showed no physical imperfection. The wire removed from the vertical tendon had some corrosion and pitting. It is noted that the wire removed from the vertical tendon in the fifth-year surveillance also showed some corrosion and pitting. The vertical tendons were stressed to the full effective force with no observable adverse effect, and the lift-off forces were within the acceptable limits. It may be concluded that the wires in the horizontal and dome tendons are in good condition, and that the wires in the vertical tendons, while in somewhat worse condition, are acceptable.

5.3 Discontinuous Wires No discontinuous wires were .found during this tendon surveillance.

.6.0, RETENSIONING AND SHEATH FILLER INSTALLATION.

I 6.1 Retensioning The data obtained during retensioning are shown in Table 6-1.

K The tendons were retensioned to approximately the same stress level indicated by the lift-off forces obtained during detensioning, with allowance made for the tendons where a wire was removed for physical examination and testing.

The retensioning data will be used as input for the next sche'duled tendon surveillance.

6.2 Sheath Filler Installation The volume of sheath filler replaced after retensioning is indicated in Table 6-1. The volume replaced was always equal to or greater than the volume removed.

7.0 WIRE TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER 7.1 Wire Testing 7.1.1 S ecimen Selection and Pre aration The locations of the specimens selected from each tendon wire for tensile testing are shown in Appendix B. The specimens were obtained from each end and the middle of each tendon wire removed. The specimens were cut to a length of approximately 126 inches.

After the specimens were cut from the pulled wires, they were tagged with the following information:

a. Tendon identification number

b. Location of the specimen; i.e., middle or end .section

c. Gontainment unit number and the year of surveillance (1982)

These tags remained with the specimens through completion, of the testing.

The remaining portions of the wires, after the specimens had been obtained, were also tagged and retained at the plant site until testing indicated that the tensile strength and elongation of all specimens were in compliance with the specification.

7.1.2 Test Procedure

Except for the gage length, the test procedure 'us'ed was the same as that

• specified in ASTM Specification A 421-80, "Standard Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for Prestressed Concrete." A gage length of. 100-inch,

(+1.0 inch) was used instead of the 10-inch 'gage length sp'ecified.'he 100-inch-gage-length specimen may indicate a lower ultimate strength and lesser ductility (elongation) than a 10-inch>>gage-length specimen. Since failure will occur at the weakest point in. the wire, the ultimate strength obtained is equivalent to the lowest value that would be obtained from ten 10-inch specimens. Elongation at failure will also tend to be less due to the distribution of the elongation at the neck-down area over a length of wire 10 times that of the nominal 10-inch specimen.

The apparatus used for the tensile testing of the specimens was the Tinius Olsen Universal Testing machine with a 1,200,000-pound capacity, of'he Pittsburgh Test'ing Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. For the machine calibration report, see Appendix E.

7.1.4 Test Results The results of the tensile testing on the 100-inch-gage-length wire specimens are shown in Appendix C and Table 7-1.

7.1.4.1 Yield Strength The yield strength of all wire specimens tested'xceeded the specified minimum strength of 192 ksi at 1-percent elongation. 'ield 7.1.4.2 Ultimate Strength The ultimate strength of all wire specimens tested exceeded the specified minimum ultimate strength of 240 ksi as specified by ASTM A 421-80.

L

7.1.4.3 Elongation Since 100-inch-gage-length specimens were used in the tensile testing, a lesser percentage of elongation may be expected than from the testing of 10-inch-gage>>length specim~y~ of identical wire, as discussed in paragraph 7.1.2. Previous test data indicated that a wire which showed a 4-percent elongation at ultimate strength in a 10-inch-gage-length testing could be expected to exhibit a somewhat lower (no less than 3-percent) elongation at ultimate strength in a 100-inch-gage-length testing.

The percentage of elongation of all wire specimens tested met this requirement.

7.1.4.4 Fracture Characteristics The fracture of all wire specimens was of the cusp-cone shape.

7.2 Analysis of Sheath Filler 7.2.1 A

S ecimen Pre aration quart-size sample of the'heath filler was obtained from each end of all

'I

~ ~

surveillance tendons prior to detensioning. Each metal container containing the sheath filler sample was marked with the tendon identification number.

One sample from each surveillance tendon was shipped to an independent laboratory for analysis of water content, neutralization number, and water

-soluble impurities, and the remaining samples were retained at the jobsite,.

7.2.2 Test Procedures Test procedures for water content, neutralization number, and chlorides,

,nitr'ates, and sulfides concentrations are given in attached Procedure .

5177-187-CP-1. The test procedure originally used for determining the neutralization number was a modification of ASTM D 974, as shown in Attachment 7 to attached Procedure 5177-187-CP-I. This test showed- a neutralization number of zero, so the second set of samples was shipped to the testing laboratory and the tests were redone using ASTM D 974 (without modification).

Discussions with Viscosity Oil Company (the supplier of. the sheath filler) confirmed that the modified test procedure is only applicable to Visconorust 2090P-4 sheath filler, and that ASTM D 974 is to be used for testing Visconorust 2090P-2.

7.2.3 Test Results The results of the laboratory analysis of the sheath filler are shown in Appendix D.

(1) "Containment Building Post-Tensioning System One-Year Surveillance, Palisades Plant Unit 1," Consumers Power Company, AEC Docket No. 50-255.

These data indicated (1) that the contents of chlorides, nitrates, and sulfides in the grease were well within the acceptance limits, (2) that the amount of water present was negligible, and (3) that the sheath filler had retained its alkaline characteristics.

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Presence of Water in Vertical Tendon Pits The pit for vertical tendons 61V1 and 61V2 was discovered to contain 4 inches of water. Corrective action was taken as described in Paragraph 2.1. Also, the wire removed, from vertical tendon 45V7 showed visible signs of oxidation and pitting, which may have been caused by leakage of water into the tendon pit. In order to verify that the corrective action has been effective, and to ensure that no additional water will seep into the tendon pits, the following actions are recommended:

a. The water seal for the tendon pit covers for vertical tendons 23V1 and

'5V7 should be inspected and replaced'f found to be inadequate or damaged.

b. Th'e pits for vertical tendons 23V1, 45V7, and 61Vl should be inspected at 6-month intervals to ensure that no water is seeping through the covers into the pits. A maintenance program should be established to carry out this inspection.

c. If the presence of water is observed in any of these tendon. pits, immediate corrective action should be taken to remove the water and replace any damaged materials. In addition, the water sealing of the pits should be upgraded in accordance with details to be provided by Engineering.

1 8.2 Pitting of Wires in Vertical Tendons

. In both the fifth-year and tenth-year suzveillances, water was observed in the sheath filler of some. of the vertical tendons. During the tenth-year surveillance, water was found in the pit for tendons 61V1 and 61V2 and in the tendon sheath of tendon .61V1. Also, the inspection of wires removed from the vertical tendons for the fifth-year and tenth-year surveillances showed Level 3 pitting. It is possible that the presence of water in the vertical tendon sheaths may be affecting the corrosion levels of the wires. In order to verify that the corrosion of the wires in the vertical tendons is not worsening, the following action is recommended:

During the next scheduled tendon surveillance, remove one wire each from tendons 61V1 and 61V2. If the level of corrosion in both of these wires is acceptable (i.e., Level 1 or 2), no further action is required.

b. If pitting of Level 3 or greater is observed on either of these wires, metallurgical examination of the test samples should be made to determine the cause of deterioration. Corrective action should be determined by Engineering, based on the results of the metallurgical examination.

8.3 Pitting of Buttonheads Even though buttonheads for tendon 1D53 (close to buttress 1) were completely covered with sheath filler, some pitting of these buttonheads has been observed. If in the next: tendon surveillance the level and/or amount of pitting is seen to have progressed, Engineering should evaluate this condition and recommend corrective action at that time.

10

r BUTT RESS nZmnW 6

.Xi.6

~

5 I

86'..22

4'. ...)6.6 ..

2 I

)06 46' 90IT.OM OF.

H~.IR ER E )29'-/ 2H70 EL96'-) 64H50 23V) 45V7 O2'-I I'2Hl8 6)V)

'O'OP DEVELOPED EXT E R)OR ELEVAT)ON HOOP AND VERT)CAL TENDONS .

OF BASE SLAB.

EL l2-6 226 BUTTRESS.4 Z86 l66'UTTRESS

3. BUTTRESS 5 3D28

!06 BUTT,RESS 2,.

2O28 46'46' .)053

.BUTTRESS 6..

UTTRESS I PLAN DOM~NDONG FLORIDA POWER 8I LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLAN'NIT 3

TENSIONING SYSTE M

'OST.

SURVEILLANCE TENDONS LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION FIGURE 3 -1

J 11 8.5 I

~

II

'It'

'! 2 D a P oint s 8.0 ta ts 1I' o ~ ~

0

'4 3 Data Points t gl lf III lL'l 7.0

'II' Expected Loss Curve ~ ~

6.5

~ ~

.I

'I Mnimum Effective Prestress 'esign (6.55 kips/wire) l [i ~1

! ~It

.6 .8 1 2 3 4 5 ao 20 30 40 Time After Initfal Tensi.oning (Years)

8.5 8.0 0 Data oi H

n 7 5 po 7.0 Expected Loss Curve 6.5 inimum Effective Design Prestress (6.55 kips/wire) 6.0

~ 6 .8 1 3 4 5 lo 20 30 40 Time After Initial Tensioning (Years)

J J

lg

~ j I

8.5

~ 1 8.0 i'

n 8

7.5 nt

)calf O 2 Da a Po h) 8 g8 p" 7.0 Expected Loss Curve Q

0 6.5 2 Data Points Minimum Effective Design Prestress (6.55 kips/wire)

I 6.0 6 .8. 1 2 -

3 4 .5 10 20 30 40 Time After Initial Tensioning {Years)

TABLE 4 1 SU@GIRT OF DATA SHEATH FIQZa AHD END ANmCRACE ASSEMBLIES FILLER COATINC Accgpr ABIN CNORACE COHPOHlÃlS BUITONIIEADS STRESS W IERS BEARING PIATES TENDON INIER- EEI ER Dgtg SIR ESS BEAR SAHPIZ OSIO) CORE .OORR CORR- IOR NSPEC-IOR MASHER IHO NO NUMBER PLITS OSIOH 'OSION OS Ittl CRACKS TED

'2 IDENP TYPE MCA LEVgL PLATE IEVEL IEVEL IZVEL ION 10 11 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NO 87 NOHE 81 2-15-82 MALL YES YES YES 88 62H18 YES NO 87 HONE 80 2 15-82 HORIZ YES YES 88 MONE NONE NOME 18 2 24 82 64850

'MALL YES YES 110 Ooe vire renoved fo HORIX YES YES 88 NOME NONE NOME 12 2-24-82 exanlnac ion.

YES YES TES NO 88 I NONE 1 N(Pig 80 2-26-82 11$

42H70 YES es 88 NOME 2 NONE MOR 2 YES YES YES 90 MONE I NONE 1 NONE 3-1-82 ID53 127 One vira renovcd, fo NOME 2 I NONE 6$ 3282 exautnatton.

80 2 27-82 I YES YES YES YES HO 81 2 HONE 2 NONE 120 2D28 YES NO 87 NQ'8 NONE 1 NONE I NONE 79 2 27 82 NO 89 1 NONE I NONE 2 28-82 131 3D28 80 2 28 82 NO 89 NOH 3 NONE 23vl MALL 2'ES YES YES YES YES HO 87 2 NONE 1 NONE I MONE 86 72 2 3-82 2/B YES NO 87 1 NONE I NONE 2 3 82 86 1 lONE 70 2-4 82 WALL 87 One vire rcnovcd for 86 NOM ON NOH 24-82 exeutnstton.

VER

'MALL 6'Ose NOe>> NOee NOse NOe>> YES* 88 NOME 2 NOME 93 12 2-10-82 61V1 IO 8 1 location-Indicates the buccress at vhtch cha tendon 2. Anchorage Cosponcnts 3. Corrosion Levels 4. Each sanple vsg identified is anchored; or the nearest buccress to the A) for stressing vashers, the corrosion Level 1-No visible oxtdatlon or light spotty oxtdation. vlth tendon nunbcr and levels indicate the condition of che Level 2-Visible oxtdatlon; no pit t'tng. closest buttress nuebcr.

tendon (for verctcal tendons) ~

T << Top B << Bottoa eSONE CHANCE IH COICR DUE TO PRESBlCE OF HATERe surface vhere the buctonheads are anchored B) Por shtns, the corrosion levels indi-cace the condtcton of the surfaces perpendicular to the tendons.

Level 5-0.006<<(Pitting g 0.010'.

Level 3-0(pttttng (0.003" Depth Level 4 0,003"QPttttng QO 006u About 302 pitting, 702 no visibl~ oxidation.

aalOZ COVERACE QlLY.

TABLE 5-1 SUHHARY OF DATA DEIENSIONINC AND MIRE REHOVAL AIR TENSIONING TEHPERATURE (a LIPT-OPF (s 1000 ISS /MIRE EQUIPHBZ MIRE RBQVAL NUNS ER OF OP TENSION NITIAL maaOSrON EVEL(2)

DkfE ErmuXION(I) MNCATION(I) MIRE IDERtIFICATION MIRES DEfINSION ED INT. EXP. CADE DACE CIN IZNCIN IDGE ION CACK CE PREVIOUS(3) NEM (PSI AN) tlO (Ff) OM (FI) 5 6 7 10 . 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 74 5470 690 4-3/4 750 82 15/16 C045010 QQ8557 62818 87 2-16-82 88 78 6017 735 4-5 16 780 94 7 16 C04500S QQ8556 80 5620 688 4-3/16 750 82 -7/16 4045010 QQ85$ 7 64NSO 88 2-24-82 110 140.33 140.40 72 5440 663 CII 780 94 11 16 404500S QQ8556 84 6020 735 3-1/16 750 82 -9/16 4045010 QQ8557 42N70 88 2 26-82 11$

73 5753 4-13/16 700 8S 7/8 404SOOS QQSS56 S2 6140 760 4-1/16 750 82 7/8 4045010 CH38S57 1D53 90 3 2-82 97. 31 97. 3$

70 6063 3-3/8 7SO 94 4045005 QQSS56 80 6300 770 $ -9/16 600 7$ 1-5/8 4045005 QQ85S6 2D28 87 2-27-82 120 79 6350 780 4-15/16 750 82 I/4 4045010 CH38557 81 6230 765 4-3/16 750 82 1/2 4045010 QQ8557 3D28 89 2-28-82 131 84 6100 745 4-1/2 730 90 3/4 4045005 QQ85$ 6 84 5507 650 9-1/8 350 44 3/8 4045012 QQ8558 23V1 87 2-3-82 86 2/Se 72 5507 650. 8 1/2 790 94 -9/16 4045012 QQSSSS 86 2-4-82 87 4/8 169.38 169.80 6/I 78 5813 680 8-1/2 800 88 -3/4 4045012 QQ8560 61V1 88 2-10-82 93 6/8 8 - Danoccs Rectos (1) Elongacioa - The clear distance botvoen the outside face of che bcarlng plate end the inside face of che stressing vasher. h asgattve nuabor te indicated vhea tho stressing vasher ls tnslde che trooper.

(2) Corrosion Levels: 1. No visible oxtdatlon 2. Visible oxtdation; no plcctag. 3. 0.000 ( ptcting(0.003" 4 ~ 0.003 ( pitting~(0.006u, S~ 0.006(pttctng(0.01(7'3)

Previous survotllanco or initial condltloa, vhichevor applies.

Table 5-.2 NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED TENDON LIFT-OFF FORCES Normalized Lift-offForce Wire endon Anchorage Normalizing No. Location Factor. Each end Average per wire 62H18 0.853 7.21 7.16 0.897 7.11 64H50 0. 938 7.06 7.10 0.912 7.13 42H70' '4 a

0. 926 '7. 73 7.43 0.896 7.12 1D53 0.895 7.46 7.53 0.900 7.60 2D28 0.963 8.64 7.86 0.800 7.08 3D28 0.935" 7.83 7.74 0.891 7.66 23vl 0.900 6.72 6.72 45V7 0.915 6.92 6.92 61V1 0.892 6.90 6.90 M denotes top 17

I' TABIZ 6 1 SUHHARY OP DATA-BEIEHSIONINC AND SHEATH PILIZR INSTALLATION AIR ta 1000 IZS /WIRE 0 afss SHEATH PILLER NO. TEHPERATURE (I) /1) TENsloNINc E(rlIPHENP OP DATE TBtSIDH EUNCSHON (IH) rCNCATIOH(IN)(l) TEN SIM EUNCATIttt(IN)

Errgcrlvg REIEHsIOHED VOIUHE PI UZR IHT~ EPLACED CE('a IDENTI- ANCHORAC WIRES RAH CACK EMPERATURE CAGE PORCE NOW(2) CADE PORCE NOW rogcz CRAB cg(3 No, No.

FICATION IDCATIO (CAIZ.) LA OUTLET 10 11 12 13 14 ls 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 85 I/2 6700 82S.O S 131 557$ 688 4-7/8 4045010 . Qt38S$ 7 62H18 87 2-16-82 88 -7/16 1-1/8 3/16 2 17 8 15 79 78 750 90 7/16 6600 810 4-5/8 592$ 725 4-3/8 404 SOOS CH38S56 80 750 85 1/4 '6650 810 4 3/4 5550 680 4 1/4 404S010 CH38557 64H50 87 2 24-82 110 ,-1/4 r 7/16 -1/16 2-25-8 16 80 72 750 90 -1/4 6640 813 4-15(16 S900 720 3 7IR 404SOOS Qt)8556 84 750 85 7 la 6700 825 4-1/6 6210 750 3-5/8 4045010 QOBSS7 42H70 88 2 26-82 115 -I/16 15/16 1/2 2-27-82 80 73 700 8$ 1 I/8 6800 831 15/16 5790 710 4-3/4 404SOOS CH38S56 52 74O 85 7/8 6800 83$ 4-1/8 6440 790 4-1/8 404S010 Qt)8557 ID53 89 3 2-82 104 -1/16 7/16 3-2-82 110 70 750 90 3/4 5980 73$ 3-3/4 6250 765 3-3/4 404500S Q08$ 56 80 600 77 1-1/2 6650 810 6-3/4 65(0 810 $ -3/4 404SOOS CH38S56 2 27 82 120 -1/16 2 28 82 23 86 2D28 79 750 85 5/16 6680 820 4-15A6 6500 .800 4-3/4 4045010 Qt38$ $ 7 81 750 85 I/2 6650 A-tga 632$ 775 4-3/8 4045010 CH38$ $ 7 3D28 89 2-28-82 131 1/8 9/16 3/16 3-1-82 118 730 6800 830 514 6180 755 4 1 2 CH385S6 44 s/8 6900 81S 10-7/16 5600 658 9 3/16 404 S012 CH38558 23Vl 87 2-3-82 86 -9/16 1/16 2-8-82 67 76 2/8 72 700 75 6800 800 10-58 5550 655 8-9/16 4045012 CH38SSR 85 24-82 87 -5/16 -I/4 1/16 2 8 82 59 76 4/8 -7/8 78 750 88 1/8 7000 820 10-14 5820 68$ 8 I/2 4045012 Qt38560 61V1 88 2 1082 93 -3/8 2-11 82 50 81 6/8 NOIES:

(1) Elongacton - The clear discance betveen the outside face of che bearing plate and the inside face of the stressing vasher. A negactve nunber ls tndlcated vhen the stressing vasher ls instde the cruepet.

(2) Hov-Denotes elongaclon ac tine of retensionlng. Heasurenents are to che nearesc 1/16".

(3) Change in elongation as conpared to previous neasurenent under che specified load T Denotes Top 8 Denotes gotten K ~

N TABLE 7-1 MIRE TEST RESULTS - 100-INCH GAGE LENGTH'endon Fracture Location Sample Load at Stress at Load at Stress at El ongati on Moving No. 1% Ext. 15 Ext. Fracture Fracture at Fracture Head No. (1) (lbs) (psi) (lbs) (psi) (in.) (in.)

45V7'.E. 10,350 210,800 12,300 250,500 5. 77 83.38 B.E. 10,325 210,300 12,250 2490500 4.67 49.25 M.S. 10,600 215,900 12,300 250,500 4.35 33.06 64H50 C. E; . 10,625 216 $ 400 12,400 252,550 5.39 77.. 50 B.E. 10,050 204,700 12,300 250$ 500 5. 53 56.50 M.S. 10,375 211,300 12,200 248,450 5.34 89. 75 1D53 C.E. 10,950 221,200 12,100 244,450 4.50 74.75 B.E. 10,100 205,700 12,050 245,400 4.41 52.00 M.S. 10,500 212,100 12,350 249,500 5.74 37.94 (1) C.E. denotes cut end of wire B.E. denotes buttonhead end of wire M.S. denotes middle section of wire 19

~"

av 0 0

C 0 ID

~oV IO '0Ol C

Q C

Cl E

h Ol a w

ID

~

0. C v

X 4> V

~ 0 C

oV v~ V 0 ~ TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE 0

FOR og 0

C 0 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE

~ II ItI IO POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM 0 0, 5 El V

V 4l g IO CI (TENTH..YEAR SURVEILLANCE)

'O 0

a C I- o.I ~

tll ~

0 I e UJ V

E 0

o

'l 0 v C

V1 4l 0, a.e 0 0 4I 0 1

IO N

0 e '0 0 ~

C ~

ol X

All items and services specified herein which are designated Category I are classified nuclear safety items and services VQ

'0CI c 0

l4 and are required to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 21.

'0 D 0

IO '4 C 00 Em 0

i ii /W fr Revised ii 3,' and Attachment 2

I 0.

a Revised pp. i, 2 7 nd tta d c . IC"I curse evulse ttac ent evulse tahhmeht 2 ld>> 2 "8 Issued for Use No. DATE REVISION BY CH'K GS CE PE Procedure No. R EV.

GAITHERSBURG FLORIDA POWER 8I LIGHT COMPANY POWER DIVISION TURKEY POINT UNIT 3 5177-187-CPvl

.l Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Latest Procedure Revision No. 5 Individual Page Revision Index Sheet Page No. Latest Individual Page Revision No.

iii 5 5

1 2 2 4 2.A 1 3 5 4 0 0

6 3 7 4 8 0 9 t.

3 10 1 11 2 12 0 13 0 14 0 15 3 16 0 17 3 Rev. 5.

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM (Tenth Year Surveillance)

Table of Contents Page 1.0 PURPOSE 1 2.0 QUALITY REQUIREMENTS 1 3.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS 1 4.0 SCOPE 1 5.0 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS 2 6.0 INITIAL INSTALLATION RECORDS AND PREVIOUS SURVEILLANCE DATA 2 7.0 PREINSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 2 8.0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES 3 9;0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 10 10.0 REPORT 11 FIGURE A-1 12 ~

FIGURE A-2 14 FIGURE A-3 15 FIGURE A-4 16 FIGURE A-5 17 ATTACHMENTS Procedure for Tensile Testing of Post-Tensioning Tendon Wire (ASTM A-421); Rev. 0 3 pages

2. Procedure for Laboratory Testing of Sheath Filler, Rev. 3 3 pages 5

3. 'ormulas for Normalizing Factors and Normalized Forces, Rev. L 4, pages 4, Criteria for Stressing Ram Calibration, Rev. 1 3 pages

5. Quality Assurance Provisions for Visconorust 2090 P-4, Visconorust 1601 Amber, and Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 Purchased for Tenth-Year Surveillance, Rev. 1 3 pages

6. QA/QC Hold Points, Rev. 2 2 pages

7. Base Determination for Visconorust 2090P-4 Casing Filler, Rev. 0 2 pages Rev. 5

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this surveillance procedure is to provide instructions to perform the testing, analysis and data reporting of the Unit 3 containment structure post-tensioning system (tenth year surveillance).

2.0 UALITY RE UIREHENTS Owner's quality assurance program shall govern all field, procurement and testing activities. Bechtelss Quality Assurance Program shall govern all prospect engineering activities at Gaithersburg office and at the Jobsite. QA/QC hold points shall be as listed in Attachment 6.

3.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING AND UALIFICATIONS The Resident. Engineer in charge for this work shall have similar prior experience and shall provide indoctrination and training per EDP 5.34 for the personnel assigned to him to perform this work.

4.0 SCOPE 4.1 The surveillance for each"tendon shall consist of the following:

4.1;1'emoving and visually inspecting sheath filler, and obtaining'amples for laboratory testing.

4.1.2 Inspecting anchorage assemblies and measuring the thickness of shims.

4;1.3 Obtaining 'tendon lift-offforce and elongation.

4.1.4 Detensioning,'emoving shims, and inspecting wires for breakage and damage.

4.1.5 Removing wires, where required, for visual examination and laboratory testing.

4.1.6 Retensioning, installing shims, and obtaining tendon lift-off force.

4.1.7 Installing sheath filler.

4.1.8 Testing wire samples per Attachment 1 4.1.9 Testing sheath filler per Attachment 2 4.1.10 Evaluating surveillance data and test results to assess the general condition of the post-tensioning system.

Rev. 2

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 4.2 . Temporary protection shall be provided for the tendons and anchorages during surveillance. The end anchors and wires removed shall be protected by applying a coating of Visconorust 1601, Amber over the surfaces. The elapsed time between removing and replacing sheath filler-from one tendon shall not exceed 2 weeks.

4.3 Tendon surveillance may be conducted during reactor operation.

4.4 Quality assurance provisions for Visconorust 2090P-4, Visconorust 1601 Amber, and Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 purchased for the tenth year surveillance shall be in accordance with Attachment 5.

5.0 SURVEILLANCE TENDONS Surveillance tendons for the Unit 3 containment structure shall consist of 3 dome tendons, 3 horizontal tendons, and 3 vertical tendons. The identification numbers of these tendons are listed below:

5.1 Dome Tendons: 1D53, 2D28, 3D28 One wire shall. be removed from Tendon lD53.

5.2 Horizontal Tendons: 62H18; 64H50, 42H70 One wire shall be removed from Tendon '64H50 ~

5.3 Vertical Tendons: 23V1, 45V7, 61V1 One wire shall be removed from Tendon 45V7 6.0 INITIAL INSTALLATION RECORDS AND PREVIOUS. SURVEILLANCE DATA

.'Original records of initial .tendon installation, and of subsequent surveillances, are maintained by Florida Power 5 Light Company. The original installation records are in card form and'ontain information pertaining to tendon pulling, button-heading, tensioning, and sheath filling. The surveillance data consists of the raw data recorded during surveillances and the surveillance reports.

7~0 PREINSPECTION RE UIREHENTS 7.1 The packing rams and gages shall be in good working condition and shall have been calibrated in accordance with a written procedure prepared by the equipment vendor and approved by the Owner. Such a procedure shall be prepared based on the criteria given in Attachment 4. The )acking rams and gages shall be calibrated as matched sets. Gages used must have at least 1/4 X of full scale accuracy and 20 psig dial increments. Pre-surveillance and post-surveillance calibrations shall be witnessed by Bechtel Project Engineering.

Rev. 4

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 7.2 A testing laboratory approved by Owner shall be contracted to perform the wire tensile tests.

7.3 A testing laboratory approved by Owner shall be contracted to perform the sheath filler tests.

2,A Rev. 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1

8. 0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES 8.1 Removal and Inspection of Sheath Filler The sheath filler, manufactured by Viscosity Oil Company, may be liquid, gel, or solid. All states may occur at a particular tendon. Complete removal. of the sheath filler.is not required, provided that all filler drained or removed during th'e surveillance is replaced. The sheath filler shall be removed as follows:

8.1.1 Record air temperature outside the containment near the surveillance tendon and inside the containment.

8.1.2 Remove the grease caps from both ends of the tendon and allow the filler to flow into containers of known volume.

8.1.3 Obtain a one<<quart sample of filler from each end of the tendon for examination per Section 8.7.2.

8.1.4 Record any lack of grease coverage on end anchors, signs of moisture or any other signs of deterior'ation.

8.1.5 Record any Filler discoloration of sheath filler on the Sheathing Inspection Form (Figure A-5). (The color of the filler should be dark brown.)

8.1.6 Measure and record the amount of grease removed on the Sheathing Filler Inspection Form as shown in Figure A-5.

8.1.7 Removed sheath filler shall have label showing date and location (i.e., tendon no., end anchorage location, etc.).

8.1.8 Look for any broken buttonheads document the findings.

in sheath filler and 8.2 Inspection of Anchorage Components 8.2.1 Thoroughly clean the anchorage components with Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents shall not be used.

8.2.2 Inspect and record the buttonheads for splits and cracks and corrosion status. Compare the number of buttonheads with the number at the previous surveillance. Identify missing, broken, damaged, unseated or improperly formed (e.g.,

double) buttonheads on the End Anchorage Inspection Form as shown in Figure A-2. The width of all buttonhead splits shall be measured with a .06" feeler gage. Document splits greater than .06".

8.2.3 Inspect and record the stressing washers for corrosion status and cracks. If any cracks are observed, show the locations and sizes on the End Anchorage Inspection Form.

Rev. 5

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 8.2.4 Inspect and record the shims for corrosion and cracks.

cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locations.

8.2.5 Inspect and record the bearing plates at the contact surfaces with the shims for corrosion and cracks. If cracks are observed, prepare a sketch showing their locations.

8.2.6 Definitions of corrosion levels for the tendon wires.and anchorage components for the surveillance are as follows:

Corrosion Level 1 No visible corrosion 2 Visible Oxidation; no pitting 3 0.000".a pitting, K 0.003" 4 0.003" ~ pitting ~ 0.006" 5 0.006>> W pitting ~ 0.010"

~ The corrosion levels for the surveillance as compared to the criteria used during, the field instaU.ation are indicated below:

Corrosion Level Acce tabilit at Surveillance Field Installation Installation 1 A~ Acceptable 2 Q* C* D* E* Acceptable 3, 4, 5 F* Unacceptable 8.3 Detensioning and Lift-offForces

'.3.1 Safety All personnel on work platforms during detensioning and retensioning operations sliall be familiar with, and abide by,'he following safety rules:

a. Do not stand behind the )acking ram while they are pressurized.

b. Keep fingers away from the tendons and packing ram, except when required to read lift-off forces, and remove or install shims.

c. Visually examine the 5ack prior to each use for damage or deformation.

• Prescon symbols identifying Corrosion Level (no longer used)

Rev. 0

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1

d. When coupling the jack to the anchorage head, make sure that the threads on the anchorage head are fully engaged by the jack.

8.3.2 LiftoffVerification 8.3.2. 1 'etermine the number of effective wires for each tendon from the previous surveillance less any broken wire found in the current surveillance.

The number of effective wires shall be determined by subtracting from the total possible number of wires (90) those which are broken, missing, or not buttonheaded.

8.3.2.2 Calculate and record the jacking forces required to obtain the specified 80 percent minimum ultimate strength (0.8f's) per wire. These forces are obtained by multiplying the number of effective. wires by 9.43 kips. Use these values with the jack calibration chart to obtain the gage readings equivalent to the forces. Note that the applied jacking force for each tendon'shall not exceed the value thus determined. If lift-offhas not been achieved at this maximum force, the jacking ram shall be unloaded and the Resident Engineer in-charge shall be notified for resolution.

1 8.3.2.3 Attach the jacking ram to the anchorage head and the bearing plate. Note that if the initial stressing was done from both ends of a tendon, the surveillance shall be. performed in the same

~armer.

Install the pressure gages to the jacking ram and

'.3.2.4 record their identification numbers. Check the gages for zero pressure reading.

8.3.2.5 Measure and record the depth of the existing shims.

8.3.2.6 Begin applying pressure to the jack and determine the lift-off force by tensioning the tendon until all shims are loosened. Lift-off is achieved when the sound produced by tapping on shims with a small hammer changes to indicate release from compression; also, all accessible shims can be moved by tapping with an approximately 24 oz.

weight hammer.

8.3.2.7 Read and record in the'orm shown in Figure A-3, the gage pressure, ram extension and the corresponding tendon elongation ( + 1/16") which is defined as the distance between the outside Rev. 0

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 face of bearing plate and the inside face of the anchorage head.

8.3.2.8 Slowly decrease the pressure on the jack to allow the anchorage head to reseat, on the shims. No additional shimming is added at this time. Repeat, steps 8.3.2.6 and 8.3.2.7 until three consecutive measurements of the 'lift off forces show a variation of + 50 psig or less.

8.3.2 ' Calculate and record the lift off force for each end of the tendon using the appropriate jacking ram calibration constants. Calculate and record the average lift off force for the tendon and the average force per effective wire.

8.3.2.10 Verify that the average lift off force per wire is greater than the minimum effective design pres'tress.'.3.3 Detensioning 8.3.3.1 On completion of the lift off verification, increase the jacking ram pressure. until the shims can be removed. Then slowly decrease the pressure on the jacking ram to detension the tendon until the gage reading on the jacking ram corresponds to

'1000 lbs/wire. Record the jacking force and the tendon elongation ( + l/16").

8.3.3.2 Depressurize the jack until the gages read zero.

If necessary for tendon anchorage .area inspection or wire removal, detach the gage from the jack and remove the jack.

Notes: 1. Do not exceed the jacking force calculated in Section 8.3.2.2 corresponding to 80X of the minimum ultimate strengh of the tendon.

Both ends of a tendon should be detensioned in unison ( + 100 psig jacking ram pressure) holding at 1000 psig increments to equalize jack pressures. This will assist in correct positioning of the stressing washer.

3. During uncoupling of the jack, twisting of the tendon shall be limited to one half of a revolution.

8.3.3.3 Carefully inspect the tendon anchorage area again as per Section 8.2.2. Visually inspect the tendon anchorage assembly for missing, bent, broken or damaged wires protruding from the anchorage head.

Rev. 3

Procedure 5177-187<<CP-1 8.4 Mire Inspection 8.4.1 Remove one test wire from each of the following 'tendons:

Dome Tendon: 1D53 Horizontal Tendon: 64H50 Vertical Tendon: 45V7 The tool for pulling wires is shown in Figure A-l.

Caution: As some tendons may not be completely detensioned on each end, personnel should not stand directly in front of either end of the tendon when the wire is being cut.

All wires removed and/or cut shall be coiled (approximately 6'-0" diameter) and wrapped with protective cover and shall have an identification metal tag attached close to one end.

Thi's metal tag will identify date, the tendon from which wire was removed, and the location of the specimen relative to the,buttonhead end of the tendon wire. These tags shall remain'with 'the spec'imens through completion 'of testing.

The locations of the buttonheads of the wires to be removed shall be recorded on the End Anchorage Inspection Form as shown in Figure A-2.

8.4.2 Pull the test wire at the end to be cut away from the stressing washer and notch approximately 2 inches from the end. Record the end that is cut and the distance from the notch to the outside of the buttonhead within + 0.02 inches.

8.4.3 Cut the wire between the buttonhead and the notch. Remove the remaining portion of the wire and clean (Viscosity Oil Co. Industr'ial Solvent No. 16).

it with solvent 8.4.4 Inspect the wire and record on the Vire Inspection Form (Figure A-4), the locations of any damages, corrosion, and corrosion levels.

8.4.5 Compare the corrosion levels with those of the previous surveillance. If the corrosion has progressed one or more levels, remove one additional wire at approximately 120 from the first wire, repeating Paragraph 8.4.2, 8.4.3, and 8.4.4.

If the second wire has progressed one or more levels, repeat this0 procedure for a third wire selected at approximately 120 from the first two. Do not remove more than three wires from any one tendon during one surveillance period.

8.5 Retensioning and Lift-off Forces Rev. 4

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 8.5.1 Safety The safety x'ules as specified in Paragraph 8.3.1 shall apply o 8.5.2 Retensioning Tendons Retensioning shall be performed in a similar minner as detensioning; that is, if detensioning is done from both ends of a tendon, retensioning shall be performed accordingly.

8.5.2.1 Determine the number of effective wires in the tendo'n for retensioning. Deduct any discontinuous or surveillance test wires removed and recalculate the nev 5acking forces as outlined in Paragraph 8.3.2.2.

'8.5.2.2 Attach the packing ram to the bearing plate.

8.5,2.3 Install the pressuxe, gages to the packing ram and, zecoxd their identification 'numbers. Check the gages for zero pressure reading.

8.5.2.4 Pressurize the 5acking ram to a force equivalent to 1,000 lbs per vire; Record the gage zeading, ram extension, and the coxresponding tendon elongation.

8.5.2.5 Stzess the tendon holding at 1000 psig increments to equalize the pack pressures until the average wire stress is. equal to 80X ( + OX, -. 1X) of the minimum ultimate strength of the vires, as determined in Paragraph 8.5.2.1. Record the gage reading, ram extension and the cox'responding tendon elongation.

8.5.2.6 Reduce the jacking force from the equivalent of 80 pezcent of the minimum ultimate strength of the wires, to the initial lift-off reading as obtained in Paragraph 8.3.2.6.

For any discontinuous or test wires removed, deduct 75 psi from the initial lift-off gage readings.

8.5.2.7 Install shims to the nearest one-eight inch of the full shim depth.

8.5.2.8 Obtain new lift<<off force. The reading should be between minus zero and plus eight percent (8X) of the initial lift,-off force (corrected for missing wires). If not, repeat the procedures as stated in Paragx'aphs 8.5.2.5 and 8.5.2.6. Install shims and obtain new lift-off fox'ce.

Rev. 0

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 8.5.2.9 Measure and record new shim depth.

8.5.2.10 Detach the )eeking ram and apply a coating of Viscosity Oil Co. 2090PW or 1601 Amber to the tendon and anchorages.

8.5.2;11 Observations required as described herein shall be recorded on the form as shown in Figure A-3.

8.6 Installing Sheath Filler 8.6.1 Reinstall tendon filler caps using new gaskets, copper washers, and teflon nuts as used in the initial installation and record on Sheathing Filler Inspection Form as shown in Figure A-5.

Nuts with nylon inserts may be used instead of teflon nuts.

Nuts and copper washers are non-Category I.

8.6.2 Refill the tendon sheathing with Vicosity Oil Co.

Visconorust 2090P<<4 sheath filler. The sheath filler shall be heated to its meltin'g point prior to pumping (approximate melting point is 135 0 - 145 0 F). The temperature of the filler at the filler pump shall be approximately 120 F

( + '10 F). 'o not reuse filler that has been removed from the tendons. Pumping shall continue from one end.of the tendon, until approximately 5 gallons of filler, without any air'bubbles or visible foreign substances, flow out of the outlet at the opposite end of the tendon.

~ ~

8.6.3 Record the temperature of the sheath filler at the drum and at the outlet. Also, record on the Sheath Filler Inspection Form (Figure A-5) the volume of sheath filler replaced for each surveillance tendon.

"'.7 Laboratory Testing of Tendon Qiie Samples and Sheath Filler Samples.

8'.7.1 Tendon Mire Sample Testing 8.7.1.1 Tensile test shall be performed on at least three specimens from each surveillance wire removed.

Tensile test specimens, each approximately "

126 inches long, shall be taken from near the center and each end of the wires. Additional specimens shall be taken from the portions of the wire that appear to have a corrosion rating one or more levels greater than the average descriptions of the wires.

8.7.1.2 Remaining wires not used for testing shall be protected against corrosion and retained until test results have been finalized.

8.7.1.3 Tensile tests also shall be made on at least one specimen from each broken wire removed. The test specimen shall be taken near the break and shall be approximately 126 inches long.

Rev. 3

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 8.7.1.4 All tensile tests shall be performed in accordance with Attachment 1. "Specification for Tensile Testing of Post-Tensioning Tendon Wire."

8.7.1.5 For acceptance criteria see Paragraph 9.3.

8;7.2 Sheath Filler Sample Testing 8.7.2.1 Analytical testing shall be performed on at least one specimen, each one quart in size, from each surveillance tendon.

8.7.2.2 Additional specimen obtained from the surveillance tendons, but not used for testing, shall be retained until test results have been finalized.

8,7.2.3 All sheath filler testing shall be performed in, accordance with Attachment 2, "Specification for Laboratory Testing of Sheath Piller."

9.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA.

9.1 Sheath Filler The following shall be the acceptance criteria:

a. Chlorides 2 ppm maximum

b. Nitrates 4 ppm maximum

c. Sulfides -2 ppm maximum

d. Water (H2 0) << 10K dry weight maximum

~

9.2 Corrosion Level Acceptable corrosion levels for tendon wires and shall be in accordance with Section 8.2.6. anchorage'omponents 9.3 Tendon Physical Condition Test The acceptance. criteria for the wire tensile test shall be no failure below the guaranteed ultimate stress of 240,000 psi.

9.4 Tendon Lift-off Force The lift-off forces for all surveillance tendons shall be greater than the minimum effective design prestress per Figures 5-1, 5-2,and 5-3 in fifth year surveillance report.

9.5 If the above criteria are not met, an evaluation by Pro)ect Engineering shall be conducted to determine if corrective measures are necessary.

9.6 Missing, Broken and/or Damaged Wires 10 Rev. 1

e Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 9.6.1 Missing, broken and/or damaged wire criteria is based on original quantity of 90 wires per tendon.

9.6.2 The buttonheads with splits greater than 0.06 inches wide will be identified as defective buttonheads.

9.6.3 The broken and missing wires will be treated as ineffective wires for system evaluation. Broken. wires will be removed for examination and laboratory testing if conditions are feasible. (See Section 8.4.1 for identification tags)

Record information. obtained per Paragraphs 9.6.2 and 9.6.3 '.6.4 on the form as shown in Figure A-2 for an engineering evaluation.

10.0. REPORT 10.1 Data Data obtained during the surveillance shall be summarized in a report. The original data and records of the surveillance shall be submitted to Florida Po'wer and Ligh't Company within'0 days oF completion of the tendon surveillance at the Turkey Point Plant.

Any deviations and nonconforming items shall be reported,.to Prospect Engineering for evaluation and disposition.

10.2 Evaluation The surveillance data for each tendon shall be compared with previous records to determine if:

'a. Additional wires have broken since last surveillance.

b. The lift-off force for the tendon is below the minimum effective'esign prestress.

c. Changes in wire corrosion level, or anchorage assembly corrosion level, have occurred.

P

d. Deterioration of sheath filler has occurred.

e. Significant changes in wire elongation, yield, and ultimate strength have occurred.

If any of these conditions exists, the report shall include an evaluation by Prospect Engineering of condition, and where necessary, recommendations for remedial actions.

10.3 Formulas Formulas for normalizing factors and normalized forces are given in Attachment 3.

Rev. 2

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 HEAD, SEE DETAIL ST'D NUT SLEEVE, SEE DETAIL ~2 WELD TO EYE S/S" UNC SAW CUT I CI CI CI

+

0 )N NOTES:

The nut with the pulling ring.

welded to ii may be replaced with an eye nut.

2. The hardness of this. tool shall'Iot exceed Rockwell C40.

FIGURE A-]. SHEET10F 2 (Rev.0)

FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 3 MIRE PUI.LER 12

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1

+95 + F008 DlA. REAM TO SUlT

.000. BUTTONHEAD COO OC)

OO 00 CV ~

0 LA N

+

bCV 4)

C) ca SAW CUT

.75" a.12 4 .06 g .12 a .06

..063" 5 .005 HEAD

'ETAlL SH. 2 a

+

,4w MOVABLE SLEEVE DETAl1 SH.-2 FIGURE A $ SHEET2OF 2 (Re>.0 FLORIQA POSER 5 I.IGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 3 WIRE PULLER 13

Proc!edure 517?-187-CP-1 TENDON NO. LOCAT1ON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 0 pp 00 00 0000 000 PP Op pppp opQO 000 G 0ppp PPpPO PPO 00 000 00 Opp 000 00 Opp 000 Op 000 0 + Opp 0 + ppp 0 0 Opp 000 pp 0 00 ~

pp 000 Opp 000 ppp 0000 OOO ppp0 OOOO ppppp OOPOp 00000 Opp 0 0000 pp 00 0 Op 0 0 0 END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS ) .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL WASHER WASHER BlllTONHSADS BUTTONHEADS SHNS SHIMS BEARING PLATE BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

SUTTONHEADS: (BH) CORROSION LEVELS-0 OFF SIZE BUTTONHEAD ¹1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT, ¹2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONSNO PITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY ¹30 C PITTING 6 0.003" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE

¹4 0.003 4 PITTING ~ 0.006

¹B 0.006" 'st'. PITTING ~ L010

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND

.TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Total No. of of Broken, or BP'o.

Total No. BH Damaged No. of Broken, Damaged or Missing BH Missing BH No. of BH with Splits P 0.06" No. of BH with Spiito P 0,00" No. of Improperly Formed BH No. of Xmpropor1y Pormod BH INSPECTED BY FlGURE A-.2 (Rev. 0)

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B FLORIDA POWER 5 I.IGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION

.14 SHEET OF

I TENDON NO. BUTTRESS INSPECTED BY DATE JACKING RAM NO. NUM. EFF. WIRES EXTERIOII TEMPERATURE GAGE NO.

0 DETENSIONING INTERiOR TEMPERATURE 0 RETENSIONING DESCRIPTION OBJECTIVE ACTUALMEASURED CHECK GAGES tZERO)

MEASURE SHIMS CALCULATED JACKING ~CE (Section 8.3.2.2)

C7 OBTAIN LIFT-OFF R

zO (ii) Gage Reading EPT (ii) Jacking Force MEASURE ELONGATION AT LIFT-OF Section 8.3.2.6)

JACK PRESSURE & ELONGATION AT 1000 1be/wire

'(Section 8.3.3.1)

DEPRESSURIZE TO ZERO P

REMOVE RAM (ig neceaaggy)

REMOVE WIRE WAS THIS END CUT7 CHECK CONTINUITY PRESSURIZE AT 1000 LBAYIRE

/

MEASURE ELONGATION ii zO PRESSURIZE TO Af's R

QJ MEASURE ELONGATION I

Ql AT.Sf'RESSURE Cj 0 RESHIM A) NEW LIFT.OF F B) NEW SHIMS

~ PRESSURE SHALL NOT DROP BELOW THIS LEVEL AFTER PRESSURIZATION TO.SI'~

iiELONGATION IS THE DISTANCE FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE BEARING PLATE TO THE INSIDE FACE OF THE STRESSING WASHER. (THIS WILLBE A NEGATIVE NUMBER IF THE WASHER IS INSIDE THE TRUMPET.)

FIGURE A-3 (Rev.3 )

15 Procedure 5177-187-CP-1

Procedure 5177-187-CP" 1 TENDON NO. CLOSESTBUTTRESSES SH END 125'OTAL LENGTH OF WIRE CORROSION LEVEL; NOPE:

Q 4'1 NO VISIBI.E OXIDATION Record location and identify 0 02 VISIBLE OXIDATION.NO PITTING any damage or corrosion and 0 OS0"< PITTING < 0.003" corrosion Levels.

Q 44 0,003" < PITTING - 0.006 Q 45 0.006" < PITTING < 0.010" FIGURE AA Pev. 0)

INSPECTED BY FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

DATE TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POSTTENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE BH" BUTTONHEAD SIRE INSPECTION 5 TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS 16 SHEET OF

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 SHEATHING FILI.ER INSPECTION TENDON NO.

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE S .

CLOSEST BUTTRESS CLOSEST BUTTRESS DETKNSIONING: DETENSIONING:

TEMPERATURE: TEMPERATURE:

OUTSIDE OUTSIDE lNSIDE INSIDE Vol. of GREASE REMOVED Vol. of GREASE REMOVED COLOR BY: BY:

I DATE: DATE:

VISUAL EXAMINATION OF

,SHEATH FILLER RETENSIONING: RETENSIONING:

TEMPERATURE: TEMPERATURE:

OUTSIDE OUTSIDE

'NSIDE INSIDE INLET lNLET OUTLET OUTLET

'Vol. of GREASE REPLACED Vol. of GREASE REPLACED BYt BY:

DATE: CIATE:

REINSTALLED: REINSTALLED."

(i) TENDON FILIZR CAPS (i) TENDON FILIZR CAPS USING USING'EW GASKETS NEW GASKETS (ii) COPPER WASHERS (iQ COPPER WASHERS (iii) TEFION N1ESEOR NUTS (iii) TEFLON NUTS, OR NUTS WITH NYLON INSERTS WITE NYLON INSERTS BY: BY:

DATE:

DATE'IGURE A-5 (Rev. 3)

FLORIDA POWER & I.IGHT CO.

TURKEY POINT NUCI.KAR POWER PI.ANT UNIT 3 POST.TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE 17 SHEET OF

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 1

.Page 1 of 3'ROCEDURE FOR TENSILE TESTING OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON WIRE (ASTM A-421)

FOR

~ FLORIDA'OWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING. SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE Rev. 0

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 /

Attachment 1 Page 2 of 3 1 0 GENERAL This donzment specifies thc generaL procedures which shall be used for the tensile testing of the 1/4"-diameter post-teasioning. tendoa wires (AS'Qf A&21, Type BA) ~ This document does not relieve the testing Laboratory of thc responsibility for conducting the tensile tests ia a manner consistent with the industry standards 2.0 WOm INCr.DDED .

Hiac (9) L/4"diameter wire,specimens, approximately 10'-6" long, vill be seat to the Laboratory for testing ia accordance with Section 3,0~ Each of these specimens will have aa identification tag attached close to one end; this tag vill identify the tendon from which the wire vas removed and the locatioa of the specimen with respect to the wire Specimens shalL be disposed of ia accordance with Section 4.0 aad a report meeting the requireaeats of Section 5.0 shaLL be prepared.

3 0 TEST DESCRIPTION Tendon vires shall be~ tested in accordance.with ASIA A-421-80, "Stan-dard Specification for Uncoated Stress<<Relieved Wire for Prest"'essed Concrete', except that the gage Length. shall be 100 (+ L 0) inches, instead of the 10 inches as specified. This test shall include the following:

3,1 Measurement of wire diameter with'an accuracy of + 0~0005" ~

. 3,2 Measurement of gage Leagth with aa accuracy of + 0.05"..

3,3 Application of an initiaL load corresponding to 29,000 psi ~

3~4 ApplicaCLoa of additionaL load to obtain the force corresponding to 1 0 perccat acteasion k

3e5 Application of additional load aad obtaining load at failure and elongatioa under Load at failure (+ 0 05") ~

4i0 DISPOSAL OP TESTED SPZ~S A sample approxhaately 6" Long on each side of the break of each specimen shall be bound aad returned as a unit with the identification tag attached. Specimens shall be returned to:

Bcchtel Power Corporation 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877 Attcation: Mr. A. W. Wilk Pro)ect Engineer Rev, 0

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 3 Three (3) copies of the report on tendon wit'e testing shall be submitted to:

BechteL Power Corporation 15640 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877 Attention: Mr. A. W. Wilk Project Engineer The report shall contain the foLLcndng'information:

5~L Tasting machine calibration report 5,2 Wire identification 5.3 Wire diameter (+ 0.0005 inches) ~

-5.4 '

Cage Length (+ 0 05 inches) ~

5 Porce and elongation (+ 0,001 inches) at initiaL Load 5,6 Porce and elongation (+ 0 Ol inches) at 1'X a>tension 5 7 Porce and elongation under load (+ 0.05 inches) at failure.

5 8 Location of &ilure relative to the grip in the moving, head

(+ 0.005 inches) ~

Rev. 0

lt Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 3 PROCEDURE FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF SHEATH FILLER FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE Rev.

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 3 1.0 GENERAL This document specifies the procedures which shall be used for labora-tory testing of sheath filler (manufactuxed by Viscosity'Oil Company) removed from surveillance tendons eo determine:

a The amount of water soluble chlorides, nitrates aad sulfides which are leached fram a given coatact area between water and the sheath filler under standard ccnditioas.

b, The water conteat of the sheath filler" c The reserve aI3caliniey of the sheath filler This domuaent does aot x'elieve the testing laboratory of responsi-bility fox'onducting the necessaxy laboratory tests in a manner consisteat with the industry staadards, 2+0 WORK INCLUDED Mae (9) one-quart east samples will,be seat to the laboratory in accordaace with Section 3.0. The concentration of water fox,'esting soluble impurities and.water in these samples wild..likely not exceed the follocriag:

2 I, Chlorides 2 ppm 2.2 Hitrates - 4 ppm 2 3 Sulfides - 2 ppm 2 4 Water (820) - 10'l, Dry Weight A report meetiag the requirements of Section 4.0 shalL be prepared.'+0 TEST DESCRIPTIONS Each sample of sheath filler shall be minced aad then tested as follows:

3~1 Water Soluble Impurities

h. water e~ction of each sample of sheath filler shall be made and tested as indicated below:

3~L~L Using a spatula, coat the inside (bottom and, sides) of a 1 liter glass beaker with a 1/4-inch layer of sheath fillex 3ili2 FiLL the beaker with distilled watex at A

x'oom temperature.

3 I. 3 Heat ehe water to a controlled tmuperature of 100 P and maintain for four hours. Do not heat on a hot plate.

Heat either in aa ovea or by use of aa immersion heater so that the water wiI.I. remain clear fox tests.

Rev. 3

Procedure 5177-187-CP-I Attachment 2 Page 3 of 3 3.1.4 Run a blank an distilled water Tf titrate, use a micro-buret, 1 ml or 5 mL, with 0.01 - 0.05 ml graduation inter>>

vals ~

3~1 5 Decant water and analyze for soLuble ions. Test only for salts in leached water The water analyses shall be as follows.

3 I 5il ChIorides (Cl) by ASTH D-512 3o Ie5@ 2 Nitrate (N03) by ASKS D-992, Brucine Method or Cadminum Reduction Method by Each Chemical Co~,

Ames, Tawao 3ele5o3 Sulfides (S} by APHA (American Public Health Association} Standard Method - Methylene Blue-or the method by Hach Chemical Company, Ames, Tawny

'3,2 Water Content Water cantent (H20's percent of dry'weight) .shall be determined in accordance with AS'Qi D-95.

3,3 Neutralization Number Neutralization number shalI, be determLaed in accordance with AS'-974.

4 D lER)81 Three copies of the report on Laboratary testing of the sheath.

be submitted to filler'hall Bechtel Power Corporation 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877 Mr, A. W. Wilk Pro]ect Engineer The report shall cantain the foLlawing information:

4,1 Sample identification 4,2 Concentration of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and suLfides within an accuracy of 0 I ppm 4,3 Concentration of water (H20) within an accuracy of 0.1 percent of dry weight of the filler.

4.4 Neutralization number within an accuracy of 0.01 mg reagent per gram of filler.

Rev. 3

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 3 Page 1 of 4 FORMULAS FOR NORMALIZING FACTORS AND NORMALIZED FORCES FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY'"

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE Rev. 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 3 Page 2 of 4,

1. 0 GRRRRAL In order to provide a common base for comparison, tendon Uftmff forces must be normalizedto account for elastic stress loss during initial installation (a function of the post>>tensioning sequence),

the liftmffforce deviation from the base value, and the number of effective tendon wires or strands. The base value for evaluating the normalized 'tendon force is assumed to be the force which produces an average tendon wire or strand stress of 0-7fpu. In cases where the same tendon is sub)ected to two or more surveillances, the base i value for the ith surveillance is the normalized force for the i-1 surveillance.

The normalized force is equal to the measured plied by the normalizing factors.

lift-off forces multi-2c0 NORMALIZING FORKJLAE 2.1 Normalizin Formulae for First Surveillance i~ 1 2.1.1 Vertical Tendons 2.1.2 Lc NwcAw Hoop Tendons

~ Nv

- nv Nv 0 7f S '

h RR S

(Eq. 1)

0. 7f (Eq. 2)

NF 1

2.1.3 Dome Tendons

0. 7f (Eq. 3)

NF 1 c - 0 8 2-vtT S wcw d 2.2'ormalized LiftOffForce Per Wire or Strand FN ix NF (Eq 43 Rev. 1'

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment '3 Page 3 of 4 2.3 Normalizin Factor for Subse uent Surveillances i) 1 The following equation is used for vex'tical-dome, hoop-wall, or hoop-dome tendon:

(Eq 5) i (i-1) L'i 1) x N (i 1) 3e 0 NOMENCLATURE L ~ initial liftmfffox'ce of surveillance tendon (kips)

(i-1)

~ lift-offforce obtained at the i-1 surveillance (kips)'

L lift-off force during retensioning at the i-1 (i-1) surveillance {kips)

~ numbex of hoop tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon P

Nh- ~ 'total nu'mber of hoop tendons n ~ number of vertical tendons tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N ~ total, number of vex'tical tendons in one group nd ~ number .of dome tendons in one group tensioned prior to tensioning surveillance tendon N

d

~ total number of dome tendons Nwc

~ number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon at initial installation

~ number of effective wires or strands in. surveillance tendon at ith surveillance N ~ number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon (i-1) at i-1 surveillance N ~ number of effective wires or strands in surveillance tendon (i-1) when retensioned during the i-1 surveillance

~ total elastic stress loss in hoop tondons during initial tensioning (ksi) ~ 15.3 ksi

~ total elastic stress loss in vertical tendons during SE v initial tensioning (ksi) ~ F 6 >>i Rev, 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 3 Page 4 of 4

<< lift-off force per wire or strand at ith surveillance (kips)

<< lift-offforce per wire or strand after retensioning at the i-1 surveillance (kips)

<< normalized lift-offforce per wire or strand for the thi surveillance (kips)

<< normalizing i factor for the th surveillance.

normalizing factor for the i-1 surveillance

<< total elastic loss in dome tendons during initial tensioning (ksi) due to one group <<. 14.7 ksi

<< Poisson's ratio for concrete << 0.16 I

<<minimum specified ultimate strength of tendon wire or strand (ksi)

<< cross-sectional area of one tendon wire'r strand (in2 )

Rev.. 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 0 Page 1 of 3 CRITERIA FOR STRESSING RAM CALIBRATION

~

Re@. f

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 4 Page 2 of 3 CRITERIA FOR STRESSING RAM CALIBRATION 1.0 OBJECTIVE The following criteria shall be used in a preparing a detailed procedure for the calibration of the stressing rams.

2.0 . CALIBRATION SCHEDULE The stressing rams shall be calibrated not more than one month prior to the first tendon lift-off force measurement and not more than twenty days following the completion of the surveillance., Additional calibrations during the surveillance may be performed at the discretion of the Owner and if. there is reason to believe that the ram has been damaged.

3.0 CALIBRATION E UIPMENT The stressing rams shall be calibrated in a universal or compression testing'machin'e having an adequate capacity (1000 kips). The testing machine shall be one owned and operated by a recognized testing organization and shall have been. calibrated not more than one yeai prior to or two weeks after the date of the ram calibration using an NBS traceable standard. The accuracy of the testing machine shall be within 1X of the reading in the 500-1000 kip load range.

The seals of the stressing rams shall be inspected prior to the calibration and shall be replaced if found to have deteriorated.

4.0 'ROCEDURE 4.1 Setup 4.1.1 The ram and the pressure gage shall be calibrated as a matched set. The accuracy of pressure gage shall also be verified independently.

4.1.2 The'aboratory setup for calibration shall resemble as closely as possible the field setup during the surveillance.

The hydraulic pump to be used during the surveillance be used during the calibration unless it can be shown shall'lso that the calibration constants are independent of the pump size and flow rate. For smoother operation, electric pumps are preferred.

4.2 Calibration 4.2.1 Each ram shall be calibrated at different piston extensions to envelop the entire range of piston extensions expected Rev. 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 4 Page 3 of 3 during the surveillance. At each extension, the ram pressure shall be cycled at least three times from zero to the maximum value in increments of 1000 psi. Readings shall be taken on increasing loads only. Readings taken on decreasing loads may provide erroneous data thereby invalidating- the calibration.

4.2.2 Prior to'erforming the calibration, cycle 'the ram three

'imes from zero to the maximum piston extension.

4.2.3 A least square straight line shall be fitted through the calibration data points and the ram shall be considered acceptable if no point deviates from the straight line by more then 2X. A similar criteria shall be used during the recalibration. Xf this criteria is not met, an evaluation by Pro)ect Engineering shall be conducted to determine if corrective measures are necessary.

Rev, 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 5 Page 1 of 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS FOR VISCONORUST 2090 P-4 VISCONORUST '1601 AMBER, VISCOSITY OIL COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL SOLVENT NO. 16 PURCHASED FOR TENTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE Rev. 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 5 Page 2 of 3

1. 0 GENERAL This document specifies the quality assurance provisions required for the purchase of the following:

a. Visconorust 2090 P-4 tendon sheath filler

b. Visconorust 1601 Amber

c. Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 2.0 DOCUMENTATION RE UIRED FROM SELLER 2.1 The Seller of the tendon sheath filler sha11 furnish certificates of compliance stating that the sheath filler meets the following requirements:

a. Water Soluble Chlorides'- 2 ppm (maximum), as determined by ASTM D512.

b. Water Soluble Nitrates - 4 ppm (maximum), as determined by ASTM D992, Brucine Method or Cadminum Reduction Method by Hach Chemical Company, Ames, Iowa.

Ce Water Soluble Sulfides - 2 ppm (maximum), as determined by APHA (American Public Health Association) Standard Method Methylene Blue - or the method by Hach Chemical Company, Ames, Iowa.

d. Water Content >> Maximum of 10X of dry.weight, as determined by ASTM D95.

e. Neutralization Number - Total base number not less than 35, as determined by ASTM D974 (as modified by the procedure described in Attachment 7).

2.2 Preparation and testing of the sheath filler samples shall be as described in Attachment 2, Section 3.0.

2.3 If Seller uses testing procedures other than those specified above, the said procedures shall be submitted by the Seller for review and approval by Pro)ect Engineering.

2.4 Certificates of compliance shall be submitted with every batch of sheath filler received at the )obsite.

2.5 Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 and Visconorust 1601 Amber require only Certificates of Compliance as quality assurance documentation.

Rev. 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 5 Page 3 of 3 3.0 ACCEPTANCE TESTS 3.1 For every shipment of tendon sheath filler received at the )obsite, Buyer will conduct acceptance tests through an independent laboratory.the One test sample shall be taken from every 300 gallons received; at least one test sample shall be taken from each batch received. The following tests shall be performed:

a. Water Soluble Chlorides

b. Water Soluble Nitrates

c. Water Soluble Sulfides .

d. Water Content

e. Neutralization Number Methods of tests and allowable limits shall be per Paragraphs 2.1 and'2.2 above. If any. alternate test methods proposed by Seller are accepte'd by Prospect Engineering, these methods may be used to test jobsite samples.

Failure of the sheath filler to meet these requirements shall be cause for re)ection of the material. The Seller will bear the cost of removal and disposal of the material.

3.2 Jobsite samples shall be at least one quart in volume. Samples shall be labelled to indicate batch numbers..

3.3 Mixing and testing of sheath filler (Jobsite samples) shall be in accordance with Attachment 2, Section 3.0.

Rev. 1

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 6 Page 1 of 2 QA/QC HOLD POINTS FOR FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR, POWER PLANT

.UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE Rev. 2

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 6 Page 2 of 2 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 TENTS YEliR SURVEILLANCE A C HOLD POINTS SIGN OFF

a. Indoctrination and training (per EDP 5;34) of personnel assigned to Resident Engineer prior to'commencement of surveillance.

2 (Ref. Paragraph 3.0)

b. Receipt of pre-surveillance ram and gage calibration documentation prior to use of rams.

(Ref. Paragraph 7.1; Attachment 4)

Co Receipt of vendor's material documentation for Visconorust 2090P-4, Visconorust 1601 Amber, and Viscosity Oil Company's Industrial Solvent No. 16 prior to use.,

(Ref. Paragraph 4.4; Attachment 5, Paragraph 2.0) d2 Completion of all'nformation required Tendon 8 on surveillance inspection forms 1D53 (Figures A-2, A-3, A-4 and A>>'5) for 2D28 each tendon prior to completion of 3D28 surveillance. 62H18 (Ref. Paragraphs 8.1, 8.2, 8.3. 8.4, 64H50 8.5, 8.6, and 9.6) 42H70 23V1 45V7 61V1 I

e. Removal of correct number of wires Tendon 8 (as determined by corrosion levels) 1D53 prior to 'retensioning tendon. 64H50 (Ref. Paragraph 8.4.5) 45V7

f. Test samples (wire and sheath filler) Tendon 8 for any tendon properly identified and 1D53 labelled/tagged prior to proceeding to 2D28 next tendon. 3D28 (Ref. Paragraph 8.1.7 and 8.4.1) 62H18 64H50 42H70 23V1 45V7 61V1 Rev. 2

r Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 Attachment 7 Page 1 of 2 BASE DETERMINATION FOR VISCONORUST 2090P-4 CASING PILLER Rev. 0

Procedure 5177-187"CP-1 Attachment 7 Page 2 of 2 BASE DETERMINATION FOR VISCONORUST 2090PW CASING FILLER This method, a Modified'ASTM D-974 procedure, should be used to determine

- the titratable alkalinity because of highly alkaline characteristic of this product. P Base Number dified ASTM D-974 Place 10g of sample I

in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask.

2~ Add 10cc isopropyl alcohol and Scc benzene. Heat until sample goes into solution.

.3. Add 90cc distilled water and 20cc 1 N H2S04., Place solution

'in a steam"bath for Q'hour. Stir well.

Add a few drops of indicator (17. phenolphthalein) and titrate with 1 N NaOH until the endpoint goes to pink.

5. If acid or basic solutions are not exactly 1 N, the exact normality should be used.

6. ASTM D-974 equation for calculating the Total Base Number (TBN),

expressed as milligrams of KOH per gram of casing filler, is calculated. as follows:

TBN ~ 20'XN - BXN X 56.1 W,

where:

B ~ milliliters NaOH N normality of H S04 solution N

B

~ normality of NaOH solution Q ~ weight of sample in grams Rev. 0

APPENDIX A END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1982

'<6

~ ~ ~

~dednre 5177-187-CP-1 TENDON NO. LOCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 7 0 Op 0 ~Z OOoo POO pp q~ oooo Oppp +g

>OOOO POOP OOOOO Pppp 000 OOO OOO Opp 00 OOP pp 00 0 pp0 000 Op Opp pep ppp 0

0 00 pp e i 000 +

~ oOO 00o 000 ppp 000 000 000 0000 Opppp p 00 Opppp 00 Op ppp OOOPP

~s IS>'o Ppppp 0 0 0 0 0 0'g END ANCHORAGE A

~

END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS ~) .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS )

CQRROSIOM LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL NASHER SDlTDEHEADS ~ WASHER BUTTONHEADS ~

SHIIIIIS BEARING PLATE LEGEND:

BEARING PLATE ~

bVTTONHEADS: QH) CORROSION LEVELS:

¹1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0 BUTTONHEADWITH SPLIT 4R VISIBLE OXIDATIOMPIOPITTING 0 IVIRK REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y ¹30 0 PITTING 5 0.003" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED ¹4 A003 4 PITTING ~ 0.006 THIS SURVEILLANCE NlRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AMD 45 0 006" HR', PITTING 5 0.010"

.TESTING THIS SURVElt.LANCE Total No. of of Broken, or Bg'o.

Total No. BH 87 Damaged No. of Broken, Damaged or Missing BH Missing BH 3 No. of BH SLRB spline p 0.06" None- I Ho. of Enpoopooly Pozoed BH None flGURK A-.2 (Rev. 0)

END ANCHORAGE A mS 2/15/82 END ANCHORAGE B RB DATE DREE~2/25 82 f LORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT 6 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

~ UNIT 3 POST.TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE KMD ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-2 SHEET 1OF g

TENDON NO. ~~ LO Te o o Procedure 5177-187 CP-1 0 0 0000'OOQ .

000000 0

%00 0 0OG 000 0

~Q. OOO Opp 000 000 oooo Opp PO O OO 0 000 ~

OP PO 0 0 00 + 8 00 o pp0 +

0o 0

Opp . 0 0 Opp 00o Oppp 000 0000 pppp P g OO 00 OPO 0o0 0 0 ppppO Q

~ O 9 0,oo OOOOO 0

0 p pp p~ 0000 C 0

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS~) .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS~3 CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL WASHER 2 NASHER 1 BDITDNNEADE SUTTONHEADS SHIMS SHIMS SEARING PLATE SEARING PLATE LEGEND:

SUTTONHEADS: OIH) CORROSION LEVELS:

¹1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION 0 SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT ¹2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONFNOPITTING SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY ¹S 0" < PITTING 5 0.003" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED ¹4 A003 C PITTING > 0.006 THIS SURVEILLANCE ¹5 A006" ( 5

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND

. TESTING THIS SURVEII.LANCE Total No. BH .88 Total No. of No. of Broken, Pg'8 PITTING Damaged or A010 No. of Broken, Damaged or Missing BH Missing BH 2 No. of BH vith Splits > 0.06" 0 No. of Improperly Formed BH No. of Improperly Formed BH INSPECTED BY FIGURE h .2 (Rev, 0)

END hNCHORAGE A HTW DATE 2/24/82 END ANCHORAGE B RB BATH 22223 2 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

~ UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE KND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-3 SHEET 2OF Q

~ ~

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 TENDON NO. <EHI0 LOCATION (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 2&4 00000 0 ~ ppp 0 pr ~g OOOO OOOO 9+0000o OOO OOOO 8 000 000 000 000 000 000 Opp 00 pp 000 <<000 088 0 O +

00 00 00 0

000 00 000 OO 000 00 ppo 000 0000 000 0000 000PO 000000 ppp00 0

OPpo 0 pp

~ OOOO OOO 0 0

Pg~

END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS 4 ) .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS 2

)

LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL

~

'ORROSION liVASHE8 GDIIDMHEADE NASHER IIUTTONHEADS 2

~

. SEARWGPLATK I

~ LEGEND:

SEARING PLATE 2 IUTTONHEADS: (BH} CORROSION LEVELS-

¹4 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e BUTZONHEAD WITH SPLIT ¹2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONENOPInING 8 WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY ¹30" C PITTwG 6 o.oor DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED ¹co.oo3" < plnING E o,ooe" THIS SURVEILLANCE ¹5 0.006 Et'. PITTING 5 0.010

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND

. TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Total No. of pg 88 of Broken, Damaged or

~

Total Ho. BH 88 Ho.

No. of Broken, Damaged or Missing BH 2 Missing BH 2 No. of BH with Epliro P Q.QE" 0 No. of Ipr pttrloy oPorwod BH

'ND FIGURE h" 2 (Rev. 0) hNCHORAGE h RB Dh TE 2/26/82 FLORIDA POWER SI LIGHT END hNCHORAGE B HTW DATE 2/26/82 TURIjlEYPOINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

~ UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-4 SHEET3 OF D

Mdedure 5111-187-CP-1 TENDON NO. ~T I.OCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS)

~ O'YP)

Tpj 0 0 0 OOOS 0 00 O 0 OQ Q 00OO 000 4 OQOQOQ OOOO Oppp OOOO 000 OOO 0OO OOQ 000 '00 000 Oe 0 0

Op OOO OOO 0 op 0 0 00 +

pp PQO 000 ppp 000 000 QPOO ppppp QPQQ bopppp pQppp 0( Sppp ppp ~ 0000 p pp OO 0

Qg END ANCHORAGE A

~

END ANCHORAGE B (CL,OSEST BUTTRESS ~)

. TOP

.{CLOSEST BUTTRESS BOTTOM

)

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL EUTTDNHEADS ~

2 (sides l (some show signs of pitting) scaling)

NASHER SUTTONHEADS IEARING PLATE ~ lEGEND:

SEARING PLATE l 8UTTONHEADS: (BH) CORROSION I.EVELS:

¹1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATlON 0 IUTTONHEAOWITH SPUT ¹2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONBNOPITTING

'7 SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY ¹S0" C PITTING 6 0.003" D!SCDNTINVOUS WIRE REMOVED ¹4 0.003 C PIlTING S 0,00tH THIS SURVEILLANCE SIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND

¹5 0.006 4 PITTING 5 L010

, TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Total No. of gP No. of Broken, Damaged or

~

Total No. BH '

No. of Broken, Damaged or Missing BH Mi.saing BH 3 No. of BH with Splits P 0 06>> 0 No. of BH with Splits > 0.06" 0 No. of Iopropsrly Ported BH INSPECTED BY FIGURE h-2 (Rev. 0)

END hNCHORAGE h HTW DATE 2j3/82 END hNCHORAGE B RB DATE~>~ 'FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

~ UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-5 SHEET 4OF 9

I

~ ~

ProCedure 5127;187-CP-1 TENDON NO. ~zZ LOCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 36>p .

++0 0000'0 p p 0~C O oOoo 000 0 S 0 OG+ Oppp P e00000 0 O

~ 000 000 000 000 os 0 0 0 OP 000.

000 080 0 00 +

op Opp O 0 00 0 000 000 000 000 0p 0000 OOOOO ppppp 60000 OPOPP 0 8 0 ooo 0 OOO 0 OOOo 0 END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CL,OSEST BUTTRESS

'4 ' .(Ct.OSEST BUTTRESS 4 )

TOP BOTTOM CORROSION LEVEL 4 CORROSION LEVEL IVASHE8 EDETDNNEADE 2

NASHER IUTTONHEADS ~

SEARING PLATE LEGEND:

No OEARING PLATE shims

~

SVTTONHEADS: (BH) CORROSION LEVELS-'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION SVTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT 4t VISIBLE OXIDATIONENOPITTING SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y 430 C PITTING 5 0.003" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED 4'4I IL003 C PITTING 5 0.006 K

THIS SURVEILLANCE WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND 4S 0.008 .4 PITTiNG 5 0.'OIO

. TEST!NG THIS SUR VEILLANCE Total No. of Bji' 86 Tota1 No. BH No. of Broken, Damaged or No. of Broken, Damaged or Miaaing BH 4 Missing BH 4 No. of BH with Splita P'.06EE cygne. No. of Improperly Formed BH 0 No. of Improperly Formed BH ~~e INSPECTED BY FIGVRE h-,2 (Rev. 0)

END hNCHORAGE h HTW 2l4t82 END hNCHORAGE B RB DhTE 222482 f LORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVE)LLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-6 SHEETZOF 9

~ I ~

Prodednre 5177-187-CP>>1 TENDON NO. LOCATlON t CLOSEST BUTTRESS)

TP 7>8 Qgp 00 0000 000 OO~O<<

0 0 00000'00 0' pp

<000 000000 00000 p 0000 @~

000 GOO 0008 Q

00 00 Opp Op 0<<0 0o00-

0. O 0 0 +

op Op ppp Opp 00 00 Oyp

~

ppp 000 00 0000 000 oooo

<0 00 00000 Opppp pppop Ogp 0 0000 000 0 0ppp 0 0 0 SEX NOTE I END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B (CLOSEST BUTTRESS~) CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 TOP BOTTOM CORROSION LEVEL

~

CORROSION LEVEL eASHER SDITDNHBADS SHINS SVTTONHEADS ~

SEARING PLATE SEARING PLATE ~cry minor oxidation) .

lEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: OIH) CORROSION l.KVELS:

I8 SUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY

¹1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION

¹2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONENOPITTING

¹30 C PITTING 6 0.003" DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE

¹i

¹5 0.003 C PITTING ~ 0.006 0.006" 4 PITTING 5 L010

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND

.TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Total No. of gP 88 Total No. BH 88 No. of Broken, Damaged or No. of Broken, Damaged or Missing BH Missing BH 2 No. of BH vith Splits P Oe06" goal~ I No. of Enproyerly Horned BH None 1NSPECTED BY BGURE A-.2 (Rev. 0)

END ANCHORAGE A DATE 2l10/82 EED BECHOBAGE B RB HTG BETE~2/10 82 f LORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NOTE: 1. Top'washer has oxidation at sides. ~ VNIT 3

2. Existing gasket at top was cut. POST TENSIONING SYSTEM

3. 4" of grease and ~ater on top inside TENDON SURVEILLANCE the pit. END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-7

~ ~ ~

Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 VHMDOM MO. t.OCATlON tCLOSEST BUTTRESS)

PC l5 oooo 0 0 Po oopo 0 00 00000 0 EloglIEP o oooo Oooo ~

Ooo 000 ooo oooo

, ooo 00 ooo op ooo op pooch oo 0 o opo Oeo 0 0 +

oo pp opp oop 00 .

~

po ooo ooo

'oop' ooo .ppp ooo 000 oooo 00~00 p000 ooopo popo 0 o 0 ooo0 0 0 0Osppp 0 0 END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B

~~

(CLOSEST BUTTRESS 6 ) .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS 1 )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION l.EVEl.

1 (sides /32)

RASHER SUTTOMMEADS bUTTONHEADS 2Q;~l & 30X 83 SHIMS NHIMS BEARING PLATE 1 SEARING PLATE 1 LEGEND:

BUTTONHEADS: (BH) CORROSION LEVEl.S:

¹0 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e BUTTONHEAD WITH SPLIT g2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONQOPITTING SIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY ¹so" < tITTwG6 o.oo3" gl DiSOOMTlMUOUS WIRE REMOVED ¹<0.003" < PITTING E O.OOE" THIS SURVEILLANCE 45 L006" C tlTT)NG 6 L010"

% WIRE REMOV'ED FOR INSPECTION AND

. TESTING THIS SURVEII.LANCE Total No. of of Broken, or Qg'o.

Total No. BH

~~

90 Damaged No. of Broken, Damaged or Mfssing BH 0 Missing BH 0 No. of BH with Splits P 0.06ss No. of BH vsrh splsro O'.OS" No. of Improperly Formed BH No. of Zoproporlp Porood BH o INSPECTED BY RGURE A-2,(Rev. 0)

END ANCHORAGE A JV DATE 3/2/82 END hNCHOlIAGE B RS DATE .VI7~ FLORIDA POWER 5 l.lGHT TURKEY POINT NUCI.EAR POWER PLANT

~ UNIT 3 tOST TENSIONING SYSTEM

~

TENDON SURVEILLANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-8. SHEET 7OF 9

Procedure 5177-$ 87-GP-1 TENDON NO. LOCATlON (CLOSEST BUTTRESS) 1&4 J OOO Q 0 ppp 0 0 OOOO OOOO OOPQOQ OG OQQO QOP 000 OOO Opp QPP OOo 000 0 OQ 000 000 0@

080 0 0O +

Op p

0 0 OO (p OPQ Oy ~

OP

@ OOO Op OPP OOO OOOO BLOOP ppP 0

~ OOOOO 0 ~oooooo ppop~b YoOoopp ppppy

~z q4 OOOO Og 0 0 END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B r~

'(C!.OSEST BUTTRESS 4

) .(CLOSEST BUTTRESS 1 .)

CORROSIOM LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL

~

RASHER NASHER BUTTONHEADS 5UTTONHEADS SHWS SEARING PLATE LED END:

IEARING PLATE ~

IUTTONHEADS: OIH) CORROSION LEVELS:

4l NO VISIBI.E OXIDATION 0 BUTTONHEADWITHSPLIT 4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONSNOPITTING WIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSLY Iso" < PITTING 6 0.OOr' DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED g4 0.003 Et,'ITTIMG 5 0.006 THIS SURVEII.LANCE 45 0.006 5 gg'7 C PITTING L010

% WIRE REMOVED FOR INSPECTION AND

. TESTlNG THIS SURVEILLANCE Total No. of No. of Broken, or

~~

Total No. BH 8 Damaged No. of Broken, Damaged or Mfssing BH 3 Missing BH 3 No. of BH with Splits 0 0.06" HO Of BH.VttII SPlitt > 0.06" No. of Improperly Formed BH No of Irt.pr p r1yoPoorotd BH FIGURE A-.2 OIev, 0)

END hNCHORAGE h DhTE 2/27/82 END hNCHORhGE B MV DATE 2/27/82 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SUB VEII.LANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION A-9 SHEET 8OF

~ ~

Frot.'edure 5177 187-CP-1 TENDON NO. LMT o o 0 00 0 0000 I oooo 0000 O oOpp 0000 OOOG 0Qpp 000 0 OQO 000 000 000 ppp

'0 00 ppp 0 pp

• 00 0 000 000 + 0 0 ppp + 00 0 0 00p 0 0 00 0

000 000

'POP ~000 0- 000 ppp

< 0060 00000 ppp OQOOO OppOP 0 0 Ofyo

$ 00 Qpp0 0000 O

0 00 9

~68 dX GgO END ANCHORAGE A END ANCHORAGE B II (CLOSEST BUTTRESS~) .{CLOSEST BUTTRESS 3 )

CORROSION LEVEL CORROSION LEVEL lVASHER NASHKR BHTTONNHAPS IUTTONHEADS 1 BWNB SKARINQ PLATE ~ LEGEND:

IEARINQ PLATE ~

SUTTONHEADS: (BH) CORROSION LEVELS:

4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION e SUTTONHEAD WITH SPL IT 4'2 VISIBLE OXIDATIONBNOPITTING lIIIRE REMOVED PREVIOUSI.Y ¹S0 dh, PITTING 6 0.003 DISCONTINUOUS WIRE REMOVED 440.003" C PITTINQ R o.ooe" K

THIS SURVEILLANCE ¹SILOOS" < PITTING 5 LOTTO" VARE REMOVED FOR 1NSPKCTION AND

. TESTING THIS SURVEILLANCE Total No. of No. of Broken, gg'9 or

~~

Total No. BH Damaged No. of Broken, Damaged or Missing BH 1 Missing BH 1 No. of BH Wth Splits P 0.06" 0 Ho. ot BH vfth Bplito P 9.06" No. of Improperly Formed BH 0 No of Zo.proporly yorood BH ENSPECTED BY FlGURE h-2 (Rev. 0)

END hNCHORAGE h ~TE 2/28/82 END hNCHORAGE B RB 8822 22228 82 FLORIDA POliYKR 5 LIGHT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SVRVEII.LANCE END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION

APPENDIX B WIRE INSPECTION DATA SHEETS FOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

. UNIT 3 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1982

Procedur e 5177-187-CP-1 TENDON NO. 64H50 CLOSEST BUTTRESSES 6&4 10'-6" I

SH END 10'-6" (Sample 81)"

25'0'-0" MK64HSO,Unit 3,BH END .(2/25/ 2).

10'-60'K64HSO.

80'-6" (Sample 82)

Unit 3, Mid Sect on

.(2-25-82) 100'25'0'-6" (Sample 83)

Mk64HSO,Unit 3,Cut End, (2/25/82) 1'40'-3 3/8" 129'-9 3/8" '50'OTAL LENGTH OF WIRE 140 CORROSION LEVEL NOTE g ¹1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Record iocation and identi.fy 0 ¹2 VISIBI E OXIDATION,NO PITTING any damage or corrosion and 0 AGO"< PITTING S ILIIDS" corrosion 1evels.

0 ¹40.ee'< PITTING < aO06" Q ¹5LOOS"< PITTING < ae>O" FIGURE 5 WSPECTED BY FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT CO.

~TE 2/25/82 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST TENSION IN G SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE SH ~

BUTTON HEAD WIRE INSPECTION tc TENSION SAMPLE LOCATIONS B-2 SHEETS OFM

~ '4 Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 TahtOON NO.. 1D53 CI.OSEST BUTTRESSES 1&6 10'-6" Sam le 1

'O I

NK1D53,Unit 3,BH END (3/2/82 Between Samples 1 & 2 62'-6" Between Samples 2 & 3 10'-6" (Sample 2)

K<1D53,Unit 3,Mid Section (3/2/82).

75 86'-8 3/8",. 97'<<2 3/8"

q00'0'-6" (Sample 3)

HQD53,Unit3PCut End (3/2/82).

125'(4" LEVEI 'ORROSION HOPE:

g 44 NO VISIBLE OXIOATION Record iocatfon and identify Q 42 VISIBLE OXIDATION,NO PITTING any damage or corrosion knd 0 430" < PITTING '5 0.003" corrosion 1evels ~

0 4C0.OO3" < PlrnNG < aOO6" Q 05 L006" < PITTING < LOIO FIGURE . 5 SPSSPEDTED EY FLORIDA POSER &s LIGHT CO.

nATE TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PO'IVER PLANT UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEXIZAlCE IH BUTTON HEAD NIRE INSPECTION fc TENSION SAMPLE I.OCATIONS B-3 SHEET2 OF 3

Procedure 5177-187-Cp-1 TENDON NO. CLOSESTBUTTRESSES

'/2 25'5.0'2 IH END 6.6'.0'0'-6" MK45V7,Unit 3,BH End (2- - 2).

64.0'/3 81.0'3.3'5.3'2 95.0'.

83 82 51 3ll S'-3" MK45V7,Unit 3, Mid Section (2<<4-82) '00'-

108 0 123. 0'25'/3 128.0'3 137.0'62.

150 t "153. 0 '57. 0 82

//3 02 TOTAL LENGTH OF SIRE '69.8 //3Ft. 10'-6" 6'69.8'7S'ORROSION MK45V7,Unit3,Cut End (2 ).

LEVEL: NOl E:

Q 4'1 NO VISIBLE OXIDATION Record Vocation and identify 0 02 VISIBI.E OXIDATION,NO PITTING any damage or corrosion and 5 4'30 < PITTING 5 L003" corrosion levels.

0 4CL003" < PITTING < L0OS" Q lII5 LOOS < PITTING < L010" FIGURE 5 NSPFCCKD BY H' FLORIDA POSER 5 LIGHT CO.

2/4/82 TURKEY PO!NT NVCI.EAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM TENDON SURVEILLANCE OH. ~ BUTTONHEAD WRE 'INSPECTION Cc TENSiON SAMPI.E LOCATIONS B-4 SHEETS-OF 2-

APPENDIX C RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF WIRE SAMPLES FOR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM TENTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaiehersburg, Maryland July 1982

fh FORM SOT SCV, PO T.STIHC l

OI 4 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY aaD CSTASLISHCO I ~ Sl Pl CASK RCPLY TOI

~~ ~

850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 P. O. OOX IOSO vt c+ AS A NUTU*L FROTCCTIOH TO CLICHTSI THC FUSLIC AHO OURSCLVCSo *LL RCFORTS PITTSOVROH, PA ISCOO

+ SO LSi+ ARC SUSNITTCO AS THC CONFIOCHTIAL FROFCRTY OF CUCHTS AHO AVTHORIXATIOH

~+SARO <+ FOR FVSLICATIOH OF STATCNCHTSe COHCLUSIOHS Ok CXTRACTS TRON Ok RC4AROIHO OVR RCFORTS I ~ RCSCRVCO FCHOIHO OVR WRITTCH AR'ROVAL LABORATORY No. 828392 ARCA COOC Cia TCLCPHOHC OaaSOOO cLIENT's No. P.O No. 65121-24987-C ORDER No PG-19072 July 12, 1982 REPORT OF: Tensile Test of Tendon Wino Removed Prom Turkey Point Plant No. 3.

REPORT TO: Bechtel Power Corpoxation 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, MD 20877 We received nine (9) samples of 1/4" diameter Type ASTM A421 tendon wires for testing in accordance with Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 6 CP1-2 Rev. 0.

P I

Following scope of work was performe'd.

SCOPE OF WORK:

1. Measure wire diameter.

2. Gage length was 100 {- 1.0).

3. Initial load coxresponding to 29,000 PSI {14508) was applied.

4. Apply addition'al load to obtain the force and'orx'esponding to 1.0 percent extension.

5. Apply additional load to- obtain the force pounds at fracture and elongation under load.

On the following page are the test results:

page 1 of 2 C-2

I SAN ~ 0$ ACV.-I C qg5llkC N

r O~ PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 4O n

1 IS v0 CSTASLISHCO I~ S ~ PLEATE REPLT TOI D

1 I S50 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 . Pn 0, OOX ISI ~

PITTSOUROH, PA I52$ I y tr ~ AS

• NUTU*L tAOTCCTIOH TO CLICNTSy THC I'USLIC ANO OUASCLVCSo *LL ACtOAT~

++ AAC SUSNITTCO AS THC CONFIOCNTIAL tAOtCATV OF CLICNTS, AHO AUTNOAITATIOH

+c FOA tUSLICATIOH OF STATCNCHTS CONCLUSIOHS OA 11TAACIS F1ON OA ACOA10IHO

+SAIIOC OUA ACtOATS IS ACSCAVCO tCNOIHO OUA VIAITTCH AttAOVAI LABoRAToRY No. 828392 AREA COOE 4 I2 TEI EPHQHE 922.A000 QRQER No. PG-19072 cuENT.s Ho. P.O. No. 65121-24987-C REPORT July 12, 1982 REPORT OF: Tensile Test of Tendon Mire-Removed From Turkey'Point Plant No.3.

TENSILE TEST OF TENDON WIRES.

Diameter Elongation Load Maximum Location Of Of Original At Initial Pounds PSI Load Tensile Elong. Fracture Sample Wire Area Load 8 1X 81Z In Strength At Related To Ident. Inches ~S. In. Inches Extension Extension Pounds PSI Fracture Movin Head 1D53-1 .250 .0491 .16 10,100 205,700. 12;050 4. 41 1D53-2 .251 .0495 .12 10,500 212,100 12,350 '45,400 2490500 5.74

52. 00 37.94 1D53-3 .251 .0495 .12 . 10,950 221,200.- 12,100 244,450 4.50 74.75 45V7-1'5V7-2

. 250 .0491 .11 10,325 210,300 12,250 249,500 4.67 49. 25

. 250 .0491 .10 10,600 215,900 12,300 250,500 4.35 33. 06 45V7-3 . 250 .0491 .08 10,350 210,800 12,300 250,500 ~

5.77 83. 38 64H50-1 .250 .0491 .09 10,050 204 $ 700 12,300 250,500 5. 53 56. 50 64H50-2 .250 .0491 .08 10,375 211,300 12,200 248,450 5. 34 89. 75 64H50-3 .250 .0491 .08 10,625 216,400'2,400 2528550 5.39 77.50

-Initial Gage Length: 100.0"

-Initial Load Pounds: 14508 Tests were performed using our Tinius Olseri Universal Testing Machine, with accuracy traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.

. PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY Earl Gallagher, Ianager .

Physical Testing Department

l,g j

f I I

n I:

l.j.)

-I r ~

I-I t" l 0 j.

~

M ~ ' j

~- -

]Pl.:f I

I I ~

t l l  !

d$ j$ t  : I

~ I l

I -I J

~ I w. ~A ~ I I ~ I I I ~

I ~

I I ' j l l I 1-l

'1 ~ I l! I. )

I 'I ~l I! Ililli

-i!l Ii i!l I  !

/

A I

I.

I

.I l

' 'I It I I I

J I I I I' I

I

,:il I I I

tl ', 'l

~

I" t I j g 1

.lI .. I! ,ll I J.

I. I /i J!.I- ~:I I v.)..

1 I' ..i

~

l.l l

l l

! I I

I II J

l I I I

' I' l I I ~ I -! I

~ ~

I I

~

Ii I I

I ~

I~ I I

I I- 'I I-

~

I I

-I I

I I. ~

I I I l

~ ~

I ~

I'

~

I

~ ~ I rj,

.1 I.

nvnw ns ~ re vrevwn warsoiaer rn

I I

I IT ~ e

~: I.I ~

I I

I ~

'I

'I

i:I "I ' ~ > ~

I

~ ~

I

~

%%isr I

I ~

~ ~

ll~-.

!J I ~ ~ I

~ I 4

i-f=

I l~,

I: I

~

(

I (

ll

~ l1' t

I I

~

I ' ~

~ ~ ~ A r N ~ A ~ ~ PNINr J A

~ I

~ \

- ~

I i

I I

rt e I

.I I

I II/:

~

-I I ~ ~ I IIII li ~ y I I I

~

~ RINVIIIIIN II ~ .lI

~ 'r.tI~i N 'fj I

'I:

~ ~

I ~I l I '

I ~

Q; I

~

~

' l. .~ .I 1'

r; I I

~ I

~ L

I'

'I

~ I Vii4+4' I

I

-'i

-i I I, .',

I I

~ ~

.I ~ 'I ~

l I I ~

' - I. I ~ -I-

~ l I ~ l ~ ~

.l

~ ~

i ~

III' l

~

I I I~

~

I I

I )II I I.I  !

jI,l TlNI ~ OLITH TESTIN4 llLCNINT CO.

~ g

~I I

S- ~

I <

~

I I l o

~ ~

-I' I

l- ~ ~

~

I

-J I I

~

i l

~ ~ ~ ~

I ~

I ~ ~ ~

I

!'I I ' 'I j

' g iI; I (

TIHIVO O<OXH rCAIHO NACHIHC CO.

I s ~

s

~ ~ s

~ I ~ s

-I PjT s

' s" I"

~ ~ S ~ ~ ~

I',: I"l:

s I

~ s ~ i ~ ~ i

~

~

. I~

s sl

~ s a

I.

L s I sa:Cf

,I:,a'I i I

~ I

/Nggs ' '. I-I I I ~ I s

' I s I s s I

I ~

, r. r

~

I I ii.

s

'I j",I.i I I ~ I

~ ~ ~ s i I i . I ' s ~ ~

I

~ .I ~ ~

I s i(m I-I'. j s

a I j~

I ~

-j i V

~ I I ~

I ~ ~

j'I i

s a ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I-' I j I I-

'I s ~

~

"I s

[!

rssssvs oL ~ cia Tc4aaas4 IIAcaassaK co.

~ ~ ~

I 0

li, I

I I'

~

I

)

I:;I

~ ~

I

l II IN

)

~

~ ~

~ ~

1 I

I

'I

~

'I ~

t.

ff

'1

~

~

~ I

~

I I

~ ~

~ ~

~

t'trill~ A1 SIN JOTII11I IIlT.HIIIC Co

APPENDIX D RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS SHEATH FILLER FOR FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 3 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM .

TENTH-YEAR SURVEILLANCE BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION Gaithersburg, Maryland July 1982

RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATH FILLER The results of the laboratory analysis of the sheath filler are shown on pages D-3 through D-7. The test procedure used in the original tests (pages D-3 through D-5) to determine neutralization numbers was a modification to ASTM D974, as shown in Attachment 7 to attached Procedure 5177-187-CP-1. These tests yielded neutralization numbers of zero for all samples. Discussions with Vicosity Oil Company (the supplier of the sheath filler) disclosed t'hat the modified test procedure is only applicable to Visconorust 2090 P-4 sheath filler, and that ASTM D974 is the applicable test method for Visconorust 2090 P-2. Therefore,' second set of sheath filler samples was shipped to the testing laboratory, and the neutralization number tests were re-done using,ASTM D974 (without modification); these results are shown on Pages D-6 and D-7.

. Pages D-3 through D-5 contain a notation next to the neutralization number

'indicating that the results .do not comply with the specification requirement that the neutralization number be 35 (minimum). This is an incorrect notation; Procedure 5177-187-CP-1 does not require any minimum value for the neutralization number.

D-2

Fdesr SOT ACV..PC qgSTINd

(

el e e

ted Wdl r+ 0+

a w PITTSBU RGH TESTING LABORATORY I IS D

CSTASLISHCD 'I ~ SI PLCASE REPLY TOI e 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. I5220 P 0 do X Idsd W rr sec~ A~ A NUTUAL FIIOTCCTIOH TO CLICHTS, THC FU ~ LIC AHD OUNSCLVCS, ALL IICFOIITS PITTSDUROH, PA. 15230 CF ~ed s ACC SUSHITTCD AS THC CONI IDCNTIAL rlIOI'CIITT OF CLICNTS, AHD AUTHOIUCATIOH QSAMO C+ FOR FUSLICATIOH OF STATCNCHTS, CONCLUSIONS OR CXTIIACTS FIIOII Olt IICOAIIDINO OUII IICFOIITS IS IICSCIIVCD FCHDIHO OUR WIIITTCH AFFIIOVAL 826853 ro LABORATORY No. 826862 AREA COO/ Ag TCI KPHON$

9$ )djl{f2 ORDER No.

CLIENT'S No. 65121-24 553C PG-18999 April 28, 1982 Sample

Description:

0 I L Speci fication: Provided by Client Submitted by: e Florida Power and Light Co'.

Reported to: Florida Power and Light Co.

Pl.v..Box 3088 Florida City, FLA 33034 64H50 Unit 3 - But 4 - 2 22 82 Test Methad Results S ecification Water Soluble Chlorides ASTM D-512 *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Nitrates ASTM D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Sulfides APHA Std. Method *1 ppm 2 ppm 'Max Water Content ~

ASTN D-95 *.01% 10% MaX.

Neutralization No. Mod. ASTM,D-974 0 35 Min.

23-Vl-A - Unit 3 - 2 3 82 Test Me thad Results S ecificarion Water Soluble Chlorides ASTM D-512 *1 ppm 2 ppm Nax.

Water Soluble Nitrates ASTM D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Nax.

Water Soluble Sulfides APHA Std. Method '*1 ppm 2 ppm Nax.

Water Content ASTM D-95 *.01% 10% Max.

Neutralization No. Mod. ASTM D-974 0 35 Min.

Unit 3 - Butt 3 - 3028 - 2 28 82 Test Methad Results S ecification Water Soluble Chlorides ASTM D-512 *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Nitrates ASTM D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Warer Soluble Sulfides APHA Std. Method *1 ppm 2 ppm Nax.

Water Content ASTM D-95 *.01% 10% Max.

Neucralizar.ion No. Mode ASTM D-974 0 35 Min.

Page 1 of 3

~pea't IN K FSAM AOT acv, pc el e' PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY I I tsD CSTASLISHCO I ~ SI PLKASK RKPLT TOI IL I 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 15220 P 0 OOX ISIS I

t> AS A HU'TUAI, FIIOTCCTIOH TO CLICHTS, THC FUSLIC AHO OUIISCLVCS, ALL SCIPOIITS ~

PIT T5OUROH, P A. 15550 Cl'eC aC AIIC SUSHITTCO AS THC COHFIOCHTIAL IPSOIPCIITT OIP CLICHTS, AHO AUTHOSI?ATIOH

<OSAIIO C+ FOII FUSI,ICATIOH OF STATCHCHTS. COHCLUSIOHS Oll CXTSACTS FSOH Oll SCCASOIHO'UII IICI'OIITS 'IS IICSCIIVCO I'CHOIHO OUII WIIITTCH AFSSOVAL, 826853 to LABORATORY No. 826862

• • • Revised Report - 5pl~p52 oRoER No PG-18999 CuENT, S No. 65121-24553C REPORT April 28, 1982 Unit 3 - 42H70 - Butt 2 2 26 82 Test Methods Results S ecification Water Soluble Chlorides ASTM D-512 <<1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Ni t r aces ASTM D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Sulfides APHA Scd. Method *1 ppm. 2 ppm Max..

Wacer Content ASTM D-9 5 *.01% 10% Max.

Neutralization No. Mod.ASTM D-974 0 35 Min.

p ~

Unit 3 - Butt, 6 1D 53 - 3 1 82 Test Methods Result+ S ecification Water Soluble Chlorides ASTM D-512 '

• 1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Nitrates ASTM D-992 1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Sulfides APHA Std. Method *1, ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Content, "

ASTM D-95 *.01% 10% Max.

Neutralization No. Mod.ASTM D-974 0 35 Min.

Unit 3 >> 64H51 - But 6 - 2 19 82 Test Me thods Results S ecificaiion at.er Soluble Chlor ides ASTM D-512 *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Nitrates ASTM D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Sulfides APHA Std. Method *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Content ASTM D-95 *. 01% 10% Max.

Neutralization No. Mod. ASTM D-974 0 35 Min.

But 1 - 2-D28 - 2 27 82 Test Methods Results S ecification Rater Soluble Chlorides ASTM D-512 *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

ater Soluble Nicrates ASTM D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

dater Soluble Sulfides APHA Std. Method *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

ater Content ASTM D-95 *.01% 10% Max.

. eutralizacion No. Mod. ASTM D-974 0 35 Min.

page 2 of 3 D-4

IFOAM e01 ecv, PO qgSTIHC d el c o~~

PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY M

I e o CSTASI ISHCO SISS PLKA5K RKPLT TOI D

SSO POPLAR STREET, PITTS8URGH, PA. $ 5220 P> 0 SO X Iddd I

AS e, NVTUAL I'ROTCCTION TO CLICHTS, THt PVSLIC AHO OURSCLVCS, ALL Mt@ORTS PIT TSOIIRCII, P A. 15250

~ I. ARC SVSNITTCO AS THC COHIPIOCHTIAL I'ROSCR11 OP CLICHTS, AHO AVTHORICATION

+~

~+5 AMO C TOR SUSLICATIOH Oe STATCNtHTS, CONCLUSIONS OR CXTRACTS I'RON OR RCOAROINO OVR RCSORTS I ~ RCSCRVCO PCHOIHO OUR WRITTCH Al'SROTAL LABORATORY No 826853 to ARKA COOK 412 TKLKPMOHK922'4000 826862

• • • Revised Rer1ort -

24553C, REPORT 5/3/82 PG-18999 April 28, 1982.

PTP - Unit 3 - 61V1 To - 2 10 82 Test Method Results S ecification Warer Soluble Chlorides ASTN D-512 *1 '

ppm. ppm Max.

Water Soluble Nitrates ASTN D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Waver Soluble Sulf ides APHA'td. Method. *1 ppm 2 .ppm Max.

Waver Content ASTM D-95 *.01% 10% Max.

• Neutralization No. Mod. ASTM .D-974 0 -35:.Min.

Unit 3 - 62H15 - Butt 2 - 2 15 82 Test Method Results S ecification Cater Soluble Chlorides ASTM D-512 *1 ppm 2 ppm Nax.

Water Soluble Niirates ASTM D-992 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Sulfides APHA Std. Method *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Content ASTN D-'95 *.01% 10% Max.

Neutralization No. Mod. ASTM D-.974 0 35 Min.

Unit 3 - 45V7 Butt - 2 4 82 Test Method Results S ecification Water Soluble Chlorides ASTMI D-'512 *1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Water Soluble Nitrates AST.'". D-99 2 *1 ppm 4 ppm Max.

Water Solubbe Sulfides APHA Std. Method -+1 ppm 2 ppm Max.

Wacer Conrent ASTM D-95 *. 01% 10% Nax.

Neutralization No. Mod. ASTN D-974 0 35 Min.

• Less Than

~Revised report to include quality assurance sratement.

S N LABORATORY

-Client Attn: Martin Kossick a . rl

'anage r, Chemical Depa rrme n t

-Mark Feroglia

-Viscosity Oil Co. **+All Analysis conducred in accordance

-Quality Control wirh Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory's Quality Assurance Program, Revision 2 Dated 9-21-79 and the specification vl of this purchase order.

D-5 Paqe 3 of 3

POOH 40T RCV.-PC

~TS'll RO PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY a"

H o CSTASLISNCO IOSI I saH O ~

C 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA. 'I5220 AS A NUTUAL SROTCCTIOH TO CLIENTS TNC WSLIC AHO OUROCLVCS ALL RCtORTS

. PITT50IIROH, PA I5550 Cy ARC SUSHITTCO *S THC COHCIOCHTIAL HIOPCRTT OS CI.ICHTS AHO AUTHORIZATION I'SSAROO0 O

COR WSLICATIOH Ot STATCHCHTS COHCLUOIOHS OR CZTRACTS TRON OR RCOAROINS OUR RCSORTS I ~ RCSCRVCO PCHOIHO OUR WRITTCN ASPROVAL 828981 to LABORATORY No. 828990 AIICA COOC 415 TCI CPHOHC 05&0000 cLImrs Ho. 651-24553C REPORT June 23, 1982 Sample

Description:

LUBRICANT Test Method: ASTM D974 Submitted by: Florida Power 6 Light Co.

Reported to,: .Florida Power & Light Co.

P.OS Box 3088 Florida. City, Florida "

33034 Neutralization No.

Total Acid No.

But 4-42H70Unit 3 .11 mgKOH/g Neutralization No.

Total Acid No.

But 4 - 64H 51 Unit 3 .20 mgKOH/g Neutralization No.

Stron Base No.

2-3-82 - 23V1 Unit 3 1.16 mgKOH/g'eutralization No.

Stron Base No.

2-. 9-82 61Vl - Unit 3 .90 mgKOH/g Neutralization No.

Stron Base No.

But 4 2D28 Unit 3 .60 mgKOH/g Neutralization No.

Stron Base No.

Butt 6 3D28 Unit 3 1.44 mgKOH/g Neutralization No.

Strong Base No.

But 1 3-1-82 ID 53 ~p' o f .45 mgKOH/g (Page 2) 2~ D 6

PORE AOT AEV, PO

~gSTIRO /

~+Ja++p Vl V IlN Pl ITS BVRGH TESTING LABORATORY CETAEUEHED ICE I CI RLCAEC RCPLY Tol A

Xl

'V 850 POPLAR STREET, PITTSBVRGHI PA. "I5220 Po 0 DOX IE44 FITT50UROH, PA I5550 AE A NUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLICNTE THC WEUC AHD OURSELVES ALL RCPORTE 4< '+4 1 q< +w *RC EUEHITTED AE THC COHPIOCNTIAL PROPERTY OP CUCNTE AHD AUTHORICATIOH

~4SAHO<+ POll WRUCATIOH OP ETATCNENTE, COHCLUEIOHE OR CXTRACTR PRON OR RCOARDIH4 OUR REPORTR IE RCEERVED PEHDIHO OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL 828981 to LABORATORY No. 828990 AIIC* COOC 4 IC TCI CIIHOHC 0534000 ORDER No. PG-18999 cLImrs No. 651-24553C REPORT June 23, 1982 Neutralization No.

Stron Base No.

Butt 6 64H50 Unit 3 .62 mgKOH/g Neutralization No.

"Stron Base No.

2-4-82 45V7 Unit 3 '.45 mgKOH/g Neutralization No.

Stron Base No.

- But 6 - 62 H 18 Unit 3 .57 mgKOH/g PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY rlson, Level II Manager, emical Department 1-Client Attn: Mr. Martin Kossick 1<+ t ae e +

teaOC+

Machine Assigned ?Jo: /7 Date Calibrated: "P A-/WP/

?!achine Descriptior.:

Manufacturer: 7i Model t o: Wu ~~ C.

Serial llo: o Capacity: / Zoo ooo C&.

Ty pe: Co.=pre ssior. X Compression and Tensior.

Co..di io.. of Machine: Satisfactor y Unsatisfactory Bearing Face Planeness

~.r'ension

(.- 001 ) UPPer 0 Ir. 0 Out - ~sot Aoolicable Lower Q ln . C3 Out

+' O Calibration Frequency: ,Accuracy Requirements: (o "C=-" '"ra" c."..St'and ar.d 'Type: ~

PPoviw ~ K IM f. '"

Class A Verificatio.".

Capacity- Lower Li. it"-

Coo ~ /"Date+

/6= g/

do ooo + /- /M- Zo

~~i dOG /-/+- 8/

/j Coo Goo 5'0 ooo + 5'-3o- Pc)

Ar Stan" ards traceaoilitte cer r

tificates current and on file? Yes '.-,o Calibre"io.. Procedure Used: IS-TMi-CAL AST'.:. Referer.ce: AST::-E '.- 7 5 f Calib~atior e !See attache" pages for calibr atior. data,

~

ncrber of attacl;ed page: )

~ ~

ttr4 +e +c "s:

e~ ~~ Acce p table  ?.'ot Acce "table for Service

'rified Lo-"inc R-n~es t,"ithin +1-.': Accur acy

l. s"eve ~M m~ 3. Apo o SOo doo +

2. c'e uo~W /se ~~~ jCK PdO + / OO OOO Calibr ated by: Bc Ll AMs cation: sW. /

PTL Manager/Supervisor: Z~~c/~ Date: 'F > - /FP/

RECALIBRATIOt! DUE DATE: 0 A -/952.

E-2

Attachment B Form CAL-C (2)

CALI BASTION OF. TaSTIiXG MACHINES cont. Rev. 5, (PROVING RING METHOD)

DATF 1 1 Page 2 oz 3 Tes:ing hIachine Ão. Date Calibrated:

Rinc Xo. 3 2S P Ruing Capacity: l+ mo (Use a separate page 2 Sor each ring). Thermometer NO.

Calibration Data: + As Found As Ad'usted READING CORR.+ hlACHINE ERROR iIACHIÃE OBSERVED NET RING READlibG RLXG RING T&IP. RING LOAD lbs.

I:

R HIDING (lbs) RF %DING Og lbs /C Z3 378. Z3 37$ '.s" ~os~ -+p>-

Ii no a~

correction is required, indicate N.A; (Not Applicable).

tf 4Hz ~z E-3

~ r

~ ~ ~

~ . ~ ~

r pro

~ ~ I

~ ~

~

W ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

I ~ I

)Wg P ~

~ P P ~

~ P J~

~ P W ~ ~ ~

y

Attachment B Form CAL-4 (2)

CALIBRATION OF TOTING MACHIb'ES cont. RQVe 5 s

~

(PROVING RING METHOD)

DATE 1 1 Page 2 of 3

~ s Tes:ing Machine No. - IePI Rinc Xc. 3OCo& Ring Capacity: BOY oe <

(Use a separate 'page 2 for each ring). Thermometer NO.

Calibration Data: As Found As Ad'usted CORR.>> i~lACHZNE ERROR

~SCHIZ E OBS ERV ED NET RING RE%DING .RZiXG RZYG TE4lP. RING (lbs) READING READING C RGQ)PlG LOAD lbs lbs.

//+.~- g3.4 'Z3 I/3. ( Q, IW

(~c o /7/. o /7O. / /7u / v'C/ +a. /o

.g ooo QZF ( ZZ7. 0 Z3 ZZ7-0 le, ooo 2 F/.~ Z $ 'a-. r Z3 2gx.g wzP S /P -O-S Z.

If no correction is required, indicate Y.A. (Not Applicable) .

Remarks: l2.~ c~n+ l c/' . zc.

E-6

~ r

~ ~

~

~ ~ I ~ ~ ~

I. ~ ~

I ~ ~

F

~ P ~ P

~ ~

~ P

~

~

~

~ a W ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

rr rr

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ) ~ ~

~ P P P ~

~ P

~ ~

~ ~

~

P

~ P

> ~ ~ ~

8~r o J>J'r

~ ~