IR 05000413/1989017

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:38, 12 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-413/89-17 & 40-414/89-17 on 890605-09.Violations Noted Re Protected Area Access Controls & Visitor Controls.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support, Security Program Plans & Audits & Physical Barriers
ML20246P982
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/13/1989
From: Ennis J, Mcguire D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20246P979 List:
References
50-413-89-17, 50-414-89-17, NUDOCS 8907200395
Download: ML20246P982 (1)


Text

w ,= = - .- -

.j I Tc .

. . .

f+ fg , SAFEGUqpgMORMATION' 1 W - 6

. ,- '

NULLIAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '  ;

F ;3. , : * 6 . o,'[ .

~-

REGION 11

'

,l

, $- MARIETTA STREET. N. I l ,'o', y ' ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 - l s

% .~ J. p'-

-

t

~]

1.

l Report-Nos.: 50-413/89-17 and 50 414/89-17

L

'

. Licensee: Duke Power Company

'

422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC, 28242 ...

l ' Docket Nos.: 50-413 and 50-414 _

License Nos,: NPF-35 and NPF-52-l l Facility Name: . Catawba'I and 2 L

Inspection Codu : June 5-9, 1989 Inspector: 2 / /7/ 77 J. T.'Ennis, Physical Security Inspector Date Yigned Approved by: (A [lbQ I , 9/Of77 D. R. McGuire\] Chief h Da'te Sitned '

Physical Security Section v Nuclear Materials. Safety and Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and' Safeguards.

l SUMMARY Scope:

-This routine,' unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of: Management Support;- Security Program Plans and Audits; Keys, Locks, and Combinations; Protected Area Physical Barriers; Assessment Aids; Protected Area Access

' Control-Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles; Alarm Stations; Testing. and Maintenance; and Compensatory Measures.

l Results:

'

Inspection results indicated that the Catawba Security Program continued to be

.

effective. in most aspects and the security organization was capable of providing an ' acceptable level 'of protection for the facility. . However, three violations, concerning Protected Area access control, vehicle control, and visitor control, were identifie *

PDR ADOCK 05000413 Q PDC y

%.nmnsmw i-n

'

SAFEGUA.RDS INFORMATION ffe"O","O""OLm enclosures tN5 dxumt is deconduked.