ML20214P441

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:59, 18 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of 860911 Meeting & Response to Util 861013 Comments Re SALP Repts 50-250/86-27,50-251/86-27, 50-335/86-13 & 50-389/86-12.Quarterly Mgt Meetings Requested to Discuss Progress in Improving Category 3 SALP Ratings
ML20214P441
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie, Turkey Point, 05000000
Issue date: 11/25/1986
From: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Woody C
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8612040207
Download: ML20214P441 (4)


See also: IR 05000250/1986027

Text

ru

NOV 2 51986

Florida Power and Light Company

v4TTN: Mr. C. O. Woody

Group Vice President

Nuclear Energy Department

P. O. Box 14000

Juno Beach, FL 33408

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

REPORT NOS. 50-250/86-27, 50-251/86-27, 50-335/86-13 AND 50-389/86-12

This refers to the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)

Board Reports for your Turkey Point and St. Lucio facilities which were sent to

you on August 21, 1986; our meeting of September 11, 1986, at which we discussed

these reports; and your written comments in letter serial L-86-419 dated

October 13, 1986, relative to tne reports. The enclosure contains the meeting

summary of September 11, 1986; and the NRC response to your written comments of

October 13, 1986.

It is requested that quarterly management meetings be scheduled to discuss your

progress in improving the Category 3 SALP ratings at your Turkey Point facility

in the areas of Plant Operations, Maintenance, and Quality Programs and

Administrative Controls Affecting Quality which have had successive Category 3

ratings.

No reply to this letter is required; however, should you have any questions

concerning these matters, I will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

Di'JGINAL SIGNED BYs

~ L HELSON GRACE

J. Nelson Grace

Regional Administrator

Enclosure:

September 11, 1986 Meeting Summary and

NRC Response to Written Comments

cA w/ encl:

J. N. Harris, Vice President

.j St. Lucie Nuclear Plant

W. A. Sager, Plant Manager

t. Lucie Nuclear Plant

. B. Harper, Site QA

uperintendent

. M. Weth Vice President

TurkeyPIntNuclearPlant

VC. J. Baker, Plant Manager

Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

/. W. Bladow, Plant QA Superintendent

al. Arias, Jr. , Regulatory and Compliance

Supervisor

8612040207 861125

PDR ADOCK 05000250

S. PDR

t

'

$)Eh

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ________ _ ___-___ _

>

..

.

Florida Power and Light Company 2

NOV 2 51988

,

bec w/ enc 1:

C Resident Inspector r

[DocumentControlDesk ,

State of Florida ,

{<

-

4'

'

,

t

l'

44 .g

,

)

RII RII RI RII

? P

SAEnod:bg DMVerrelli - DWallc r rnst

11/gy/86 11/fj/86 11/)/86 11/Fs/86

. . .

.

T

. . . .

NOV 2 S 1986

ENCLOSURE

MEETING SUMMARY

I. Meeting Summary

A .- . A meeting was held at 1:00 p.m. on September 11, 1986, at the NRC

Region 11 Office in Atlanta, Georgia, to discuss the SALP Board Reports

for the Turkey Point and St. Lucie facilities.

B. Licensee Attendees

E. A. Adomat, Executive Vice President

C. O. Woody, Group Vice President, Nuclear Energy

J. W. Dickey, Vice President, Nuclear Operations

K. N. Harris, Vice President, St. Lucie

C. M. Wethy, Vice President, Turkey Point

D. A. Sager, Plant Manager, St. Lucie  :

C. J. Baker, Plant Manager, Turkey Point 1

G. J. Boissy, Director of Quality Assurance

J. K. Hays, Director of Nuclear Licensing

J. W. Kappes, Maintenance Superintendent, Turkey Point

E. Preast, Turkey Point Site Engineering Manager

R. J. Acosta, Performance Enhancement Program Manager, Turkey Point

C. NRC Attendees l

J. N. Grace, NRC Region II Administrator

A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII

L. S. Rubenstein, Director, PWR Project Directorate #2, NRR

A. C. Thadani, Director, PWR Project Directorate #8, NRR

V. W. Panciera, Deputy Director, DRS, RII

S. A. Elrod, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2C, RII

D. G. Mcdonald, Project Manager, Turkey Point, PWR Project

Directorate #2, NRR

E. G. Tourigny, Project Manager, St. Lucie, PWR Project

Directorate #8, NRR

P. M. Madden, Acting Section Chief, Technical Support Section, DRP, RII

R. V. Crlenjak, Senior Resident Inspector, St. Lucie, DRP, RII

D. R. Brewer, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point, DRP, RII

H. O. Christensen, Project Engineer, Section 2C, DRP, RII

C. J. Paulk, Reactor Engineer, TSS, DRP, RII

R. F. Aiello, Reactor Engineer, TSS, DRP, RII

_ _ _ __ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _______ _ _ ___ ____

c T

'

',,.. -

'

2 NOV 2 5 1986

II. NRC Response to the Licensee's October 13, 1986 Specific Written Comments

Concerning the St. Lucie Plant SALP

A. SALP Enclosure 2,Section IV B.1 Radiological Controls

The first comment concerns the reference to an inadvertent personal

overexposure associated with steam generator sludge lancing activities.

The SALP report has referenced NRC inspection 335/86-01 as the source

of the information. The Notice of Violation contained two areas in

which the violation was identified:

Failure to establish radiation protection procedures.

Failure to perform adequate surveys (evaluations) of individual

exposures.

The violation was issued as a result of a special, announced inspection

in an area concerning the potential of whole body radiation exposure in

excess of 10 CFR 20. limits. FPL concurs there was a potential to

exceed the limits 'and the NRC issued the violation based on the

potential for an overexposure.

Response: The licensee is correct in that an actual overexposure was

not identified.

B. SALP Enclosure 2,Section IV H.1 Outages

The Outage portion of the evaluation expressed an NRC recommendation

that FPL implement a more detailed and disciplined search for fuel

failure mechanisms, during the next refueling outage. This was based on

the additional fuel failures experienced since the last Unit I

refueling outage. NRC should consider that with an 18 month refuel

cycle, fuel performance improvements may require 4.5 years to be fully

implemented. With less than 0.05% failed fuel rods at the end of

Cycle 6, FPL sought to improve and will continue to seek improvements

in fuel performance.

Response: NRC inspection and review of licensee correspondence since

the end of the SALP period indicate that the licensee has taken

important steps tc prevent future fuel failure including initial steps

to change to fuel rods that are solid in the area of the bottom space

grid.

. _ _ _ - -