ML20139A263

Forwards FEMA 860212 Response to NRC 860116 Request for Review of Offsite Emergency Plan.Coordination W/Fema Region II to Correct Emergency Preparedness Deficiencies Identified in Rev 6 to Util Transition Plan Requested

ML20139A263
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	03/06/1986
From:	Harpster T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	Leonard J LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
References
NUDOCS 8603130259
Download: ML20139A263 (4)

Text

,__

l f4AR 0 0 D36 Docket No. 50-322 Long Island Lighting Company ATTN: Mr. John D. Leoaard, Jr.

Vice President - Nuclear ,

Post Office Box 618 '

Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Wading River, New York 11792 Gentlemen:

The enclosed letter frem Samuel W. Speck, Federal Emergency Managerent Aqency (FEMA), dated February 12, 1986, is in response to an NRC request of January 16, 1986, for FEMA to review the offsite emorgency plan for Shorehan. The letter transmits the FEMA report on the review of Revision 6 to the LILC0 Transit .on Plan for Shoreham. The report contains a listing of offsite emergency preparedness deficiencies resulting from the FEMA review. We request that you coordinate with FEMA Region !! to ensure that the identified deficiencies are corrected.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. David Vito, (215) 337-5142, of my staff.

Sincerely, eg -, . i o .,

Terry L. Harpster, Chief Emergtncy Preparedness Section Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ encl:

W. Steiger, Plant Manager J. Snith, Manager, Nuclear Operations Support R. Kubinak Director. 0A, Safety and Compliance E. Youngling, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Anthony F. Earley, Jr., General Counsel Jeffrey L. Futter Esquire J. Notaro, Manager. QA Department Director, Power Division Shoreham Hearing Sorvice List Public Document Room (PDR) local Pubitc Document Rocn (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector State of New York FDfA Pegion !!

06031302sg g60 Q 2 em e

an os% Orric!At nEcoRD coPf 4, ,

g, ,

,\

Long Island Lighting Company 2 bec w/ encl:

Region ! Docket Room (with concurrences)

Director, DRSS Director, DRS DRP Section Chief B. Bordenick. ELD R. Goddard, ELD vo / r 3,6 / 8', j /(0/86 3

orrtctAt prcopo cop (

SHOREHAM HEARING SERVICE LIST Gerald C. Crotty, Esquire Alar. S. Rosenthal Esquire Ben Wiles, Esquire Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Counsel to the Governor Appeal Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Executive Chamber Washington, D. C. 20555 State Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Fabian G. Palomino, Esquire New York State Energy Office Suffolk County Attorney Agency Butiding 2 Executive Chamber Empire State P1 ara State Capitol Albany, New York 1.'223 Albany, NY 12224 Energy Research Group, Inc. Gary J. Edles, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing 400-1 Totten Pond Road Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 Appeal Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 W. Taylor Reveley, !!!, Esquire Howard A. Wilbur, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Hunton & Williams Appeal Panel Post Office Box 1535 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Richmond, Virginia 23212 Washington, D. C. 20555 Robert Abrams, Esquire Honorable Peter Cohalan Peter Bienstock, Esquire Suffolk County Executive County Executive / Legislative 01dg. Department of Law Veteran's Memorial Highway State of New York Hauppauge, New York 11788 Room 46-14 Two World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Martin Bradley Ashare, Esquire Richard M. Kessel Suffolk County Attorney Chairman and Executive Director H. Lee Dennison Building New York State Consumer Protection Board Veteran's Memortal Highway Room 1725 Hauppauge, New York 11788 250 Broadway New York, New York 10001 James B. Dougherty, Esquire 3045 Porter Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20008 MHB Technical Associates Rudolph S. Marret, Esquire 1723 Hamilton Avenue, Suite K Assistant Town Attorney San Jose, California 95125 Town of Brookhaven Department of Law Stephen Latha:n, Esquire 475 East Main Street John F. Shea, Esquire Patchoque, New York 11772 Twomey, Latham & Shea Paul Sabatino, !!, Attorney at Law Post Office Don 398 Counsel to Legislature 33 West Second Street Riverhead, New York 11901 Legislative Gutiding Veteran's Memorial Highway

i I

Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esquire New York State Joseph I. Lieberman, Attorney General Department of Pubite Service Strte of Connecticut Three Empire state Plaza 30 Trinity Street Albany, New York 12223 Hartford, Connecticut 06106 l

Ezra I. Bialik, Esquire Brookhaven Town Attorney Assistant Attorney General 475 E. Main Street i Environmental Protection Bureau Patchogue, New York 11772 l New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Cea.cer New York, New York 10047 l Herbert H. Brown, Esquire Lawrence Coe Lamnpher, Esquire  ;

Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, l Christopher & Phillips 1900 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 Karla J. Letsche Esquire Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, Christopher & Phillips 1900 M Street, N.W.

Washington. 0.C. 20036 l

l 1

l l

l l

l l

l l

4 l

l l

. . , Taylor C[' l cys: Stello 4 Roe f d'#*=s[J f Fcderal Emergency Manage iym' Agency

'k, e[e

',,- Washington, D.C 20172 j Rehn Snie:ck Denton FEB I 21986 ccunninenam i*.u r l ey Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.

Actin) Executive Director for Operationn U.S. Nuclear Ibjulatory Gunmission Rishin; ton, D.C. 20555 lbar Mr. Stello:

On Jaruary 16, 1986, the Nuclear Ib;ulatory Ganminnion (NIC) roguental tlw?

Federal fbotvlercy Hinailenent Al ency (FtMA) to coryluct a review of 14?vinion 6 of. the Inni Inlant Lirjhtirv; Qinguny's (LIIf0) Trannition Plan for tho Shoreham ?AJclear Iburr Station (SNPS) aril to provido the NIC with its finlin;3. 'lhis ropent was mado in accordance with tic fuC/FIMA Mmrarihan of Unterstar>l1rvi (POU) datel t&nmber 1980. 11u0 to tir limltel nature of the chan;on, the tuview win conhactol by FIMA lb l ion II ntaf f.

A review of IMvision 6 tus boon c< >nplott=1 aril t he tenult n are contair>=1 in tir encionni remet entitlnl "Litro Transition Plan for Shoreh.in -

Ibvinion 6, FF>t\ IMview", dato! Pohruary 7, 19d6. 'tho Plan win revieuw!

arpirut the ntaratards arvi < nluativo crit oria of_ tant!I',-0654/FIMA-PEP-1, Ibv. 1. Due to the Impt authority inmy's which arino when n< re tantm 01,inents are applint to a utility-b.n 1 plan, we havo trur kod wi th an a3terink any anp'et of the pl in wtwro, in enir vir s, thin Innt issuo occurs. With the excoption of plan aqpictn relatin; to tEfiOI; olet ='nt A.2.h. (a regiirnvnt to ntato, t*/ reforence t o npw:1fic act n, ntat ut es, or colon, the inp1 tunin f or t ho aut turity to carry < mat tie ronp>nnihilition liqtn! in A.2.a. , i .e. , all ru jor r oup xr o f unct iorvi), t tr' lo<gil o worn rild not atteet tho FIMA ratin: <jiven t o t he t ochnical or < gw'ratiotul itoma relatirr; to teTIO; climnto.

FDtA t inh tlut P,a/ inion 6 19 a f urttw?r irnpr<n.wint over 14'vi nion 5. Six in.31 v;n t :f on utro idont ifint in the PN?'n roview of 14' vin ton 5; t ivo o l e rwn t- are ratol inabvputo in Pevision 6. 'tho doficioncios ato explainnt in t ho F!MA rovi"w. ~1he tPnw; ovaluat ion crit or ia f or t ho 5 inailn;o.it o olernonta aro au follem. ( An ant orink irvlic it"1 tIw'ro i. also a corvorn r>>rtainin; to lorpt aut.hority which nurf aoni in t !" r ovie s. In n<re of tie in slopucion, t bo lap t t +,m en at o t ho m jor nwor ret. )

(l) A.2.h.* I;ich plan uh.ilI cont ain (liy rof oronco to ur**cific act9, o sien or at at ut oq) tte I n g l t u al , f,ir w:h aut hot it i<r; (i.o., tsp' autlwirit io1 tvnt iorin t in ratPm-0% 1 oint..nt A.2.a.).

( .' ) A . 1.

• I;ich plan '.hil1 inclip to wr it t on .elt 8a tvnt 4 rotorrtrol t o t to

~

<35twiopt of rgsit atir ein dovolopw! lait wron h lor al, St it o, arut l< m al

.e joncinq .irvi otler suppir t ot tl ini tit iorrt havirvi ari .v err;"tw:y t o pin to r'o l o Wi t Ili rl t b8' l)'5'r rja'f)cy Plaf)fli f p ) Z< sf r ") . MW9 .D lr f H 9'3 4)t ') <.} n.l l l lils'f)?Ify iIH? 8 v'w 'rT p 'f t':y ne'allir 8"1 I/p l .' (>f f P/ t' b a l .lf r i t lH' Mllt il il l y accor,' ahlo er i t "r ia for t hol r irminrot at lon, af wI ' r 'ci f y t ho

.ir f <1f t;# 9'w'f tt y ft)r e*(< h lft p' <>f i n f r ) t "i e t i < d i .

~

) 9 2

(3) C.4.* Each organization sha11 identify nuclear and other facilities, organizations, or individuals which can be relied upon in an emergency to provide assistance. Such assistance shall be identified and supported by appropriate letters of agreement.

1 (4) J.10. k .

• The organization's plans to implen?nt protective measures I for the plume exposure pathway shall include: Identification of and means for dealing with potential impediments (e.g., seasonal impassa-bility of roads) to the use of evacuation routes, and contingency measures.

(5) J.12 Each organization sha}1. describe the means for registering and monitoring of evacuees at relocation centers in host areas.

The personnel and equipment available should be capable of monitoring within about a 12-hour period all residents and transients in the plume exposure EPZ arriving at relocation centers.

Of the above, all were identified as inadequate in the RAC's review of Revision 5.

I hope the enclosed finding is helpful in your analysis of emergency preparedness issues concerning Shoreham, if you have any questions,  !

please don't hesitate to call me.

i Sincerely,  ;

Samuel W. Speck Assnciate Director State and Local Programs and Support Enclosures a

1

' rte.06 es 16: 49 rCrH REGION !! POJ YOE 1

• thC0 Tranettien Plan for Shoreham Revisten 4 FlMA Review Dated February 7, 1986 hJ41G=Cl$4 flament Review Com ent(s)

Og A.2.0 fnis element remates iendecuste, ho matertal in

Revision 4 address tnis elecent. All covents in the RAC review of Reviston 5 are att11 in effect.

A.3 This element ree.atna inadeowate.* *All covente in 1*

tne RAC review of Revleton 5 are attil in effect.

sodition, this revision reewires the adottten of a In letter of agree?ent with t%e owners of the Brookhaven N1tistem Cine-a for use of teatr scoperty (parking lot) at a transfee point. The revisso page 8 vit 45cas toit 'etter to be on page 3-68 newever, onge 3 68 is the letter of agreement witn the orevious transfer point o'Coerty onver.

C.4 ints element remates inadequate. See the review comrents under A.3. 1*

J.9 Telt element is now ratec adeawate. Revisions to A Attachment 1 of precedwre ODIP 3.4.6 reflect the current FDA responte level tables including all footnotes iAtch are necessary for proper use of the '

numeric data contained in the tables.

J.10.g This element remains adegwate. The designatten of A of replaceaert transfer soint retutres numerews enanges to toecify tnis new location. The slan changes are all involves with the legistics of the movements of tweet for the transit desensent oosulation =no need assistance in evacwettes the (pl.

Tne een legistics de not enange tne concest of any erecedures.

J.10.K This element remains teaceowate, he material in 4evision 6 aasroes tnis ele.ent. A)) coceente in ' '!*

(ne AAC review of Revleton 5 are att11 in effect.

T a eleaent is inadeowately accessted in the 3146.

In adettton, corceres certaintr autio'ity to tecleae9t t*e ple*eme*eto Ltto's tegel identified by the AAC dwetng tne review of Aavision $ and are ett11 in effect.

l ~

• - 'b

, FEB.06 '86 16:50 rp m REGIce4 !! O N 1

• I LitC0 Transitten Dlan foe $n__oronam - 4evision 4 FEMA Aeview Cates February 7, 1986 WAEG 0654 jleeat tjvo we Com ent(s) '

.agtteg J.12 Tiis ele ~ent remains inadequate As tiscussed telew  !

Revision 4 aceo.ately accreases.two concerns raised by the RAC review of Revisten S.

A new Attacnment 8 to procedure 4p!P 1.9.2 gives a trigger levele for declaring items contastnated.

This reseives the RAC issue of not having a tetsger level for the interior of vehicles.

Revisten to the Plan on ease 4.2=1 aad in procedures 091P 3.9.2 ene 4.2.3 have soleted all reference to a carticsiste release as ceirg a trigger for various actions. Teese ceaeges resolve a AAC tasse.

erococure 081* 4.2.3 nas coen completely rewritten.

TPe new precocure gives a nea evacwee traffic sattern and a een monitoring arrangoesnt at the Nassaw Cownty Coliteam Reception Centee. This new processre is adecuate.

This plan revisten raises a new teswe sue to a change in procesure CPIP 3.9.2. In step 3.2 of ,

tee revised procedure, tne statocent is rade that if a radioactive release Mas occurred, monitoring sersonnel will be dissetched to special facility reception centers when availaple, t,tt0 is ressensible at reception for centers. menttering all evacuees arrivieg It is not edecsete to plan for tMit esniterleg with personnel and etwipenent when evetlable. It is est passible to evolutte the eve'Ber of Doesomnel reewired for monitoring at tne special pesW14 tion recestien centees etnce the i

plan enews in procesare op!> 3.4.f eaves 21 37

• te be arranges

• for meet of the specist popstatten receptism centers. Fewe (4) recestten centers are sMown wMlen are met the 81sessu Co'anty

• Celtsee. Ponttoring personnel ans sowlseent must ,

se available for these fewe (4) recestten centers one an other locations currently smone as "to be arranged".

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ .