ML20072B212
| ML20072B212 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 01/17/1983 |
| From: | Beck J, Lemon C, Levin H TERA CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20072B187 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8303040041 | |
| Download: ML20072B212 (184) | |
Text
i
.~
\ J I
l PROJECT GUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN FOR MIDLAND INDEPENDENT e DESIGN CONSTRUCTION APO VERIFICATION PROGRAM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY PROJECT 3201
/ /1 f Prepared by: .hw [1,% . Verified by: hl yIfj/s / ~
kword A. Levin CharlesNernon O' Project Manager TERA Corporation Project Ouolity Assurance Engineer TERA Corporation b
Approved by: M. 2/- Approved b . $ b; Mn W. Beck Robert W. Felton '
Principol-in-Charge Executive Vice President Vice President TERA Corporation TERA Corporation Copy No. [k January 17, 1983 Revision: 1 0
TERA CORPORATION
^
D Do$ho!oo$$$9 PDR
^
l TERA CORPORATION
, OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM em N
Midland Independent Design l Construction & Verification '
l l
DOCUMENT REVISION RECORD p
^
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES Changes made reflect omission of required graphics - no substantive changes in content made. Effected pages:
1 1/17/83 PQAP - pg.19; PI-Document Control Cover Sheet - pg. 3; PI-Engineering Eval. Prep. & Control - pg. 3 p i
\J i
l l
O i
TERACORPORATION l . . -. .....-.. -
A POLICY STATEMENT in conjunction with the corporate Ovality Assurance Program, this Project
.' Ouolity Assuronce Plan has been prepared to establish the measures necessory to provide odequate confidence in and ossurance of the quality of services to be i provided for Consumers Power Company in the performance of octivities involved in the conduct of the Midland Independent Design and Construction l Verification Program. To that end, the quality assurance / quality control methods, procedures, and instructions established herein shall be implemented, os applicable, by those individuals assigned responsibility for the octivities requiring quality assurance and control as identified herein. Any deviations, exceptions, or other nonconformances shall be brought to my attention for resolution.
( -Af_ Il WW ./
f .
Howard A. Levin Project Manager O. Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Program i
1 1 ;
l O -
l l
l TERA CORPORATION <
l , 1 l - _ - - - - -
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE POLICY STATEMENT i TABLE OF CONTENTS 11
- 1. GENERAL I l.1 Purpose i 1.2 Scope I l.2.1 Engineering Evoluotions I l.2.2 Document and Report Preparation 2 1.2.3 Calculations, Analysis and Computer Analyses 3 1.2.4 Source / Reference Material 3 1.3 Implementation 4
- 2. ORGANIZATION 4 O 2.1 2.2 Project Organization Authority and Responsibility 4
S
- 3. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTROL 7 3.1 Management Personnel 7 3.2 Project Personnel 10 3.3 Associates 13
- 4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL 15 4.1 Subject File 15 4.2 Engineering Evoluotions 16 4.3 Documents and Reports 17 4.4 Calculations, Analyses, Computer Analyus 17 4.5 PGAP 17 4.6 Ovality Asurance Documents 17 O
Rev.O 11 TERA CORPORATION
l TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
SECTION - PAGE 4.7 Engineering Control Procedures 18 -
4.8 Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding 18 Reporis and Finding Resolution Reports 4.9 Correspondence and Personnel Ovalifications 18 4.10 Pro:ect instructions 19 4.ll Ex+ernal Communications 19
- 5. PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS 19 5.1 Engineering Control Procedures 19 5.2 Project instructions 20
- 6. QUALITY ASSURANCE 22 6.1 Records 22 l 6.2 Corrective Action 23 6.3 Audits 23 FIGURES 1
FIGURE 1: PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART l
ATTACHMENTS A. .POAP REGISTER t B. CORRESPONDENCE FILE CONTROL C. CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL STAMP l
l O
Re . o iii Tg TERA CORPORATION
.O U
TABLE OF CONTENTS (confinued)
- APPEfOlCES A. ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURES ECP-5.2 " Calculation Preparotion and Control, Rev. 2 ECP-5.' O A " Audit Checklist for Calculation Preparation and Control,"
Rev.I
, ECP-5.5 " Project GA Plan Preparation and Control," Rev. 3 ECP-5.6 " Quality Assurance Audits," Rev. 3 ECP-5.15 " Corrective Action Procedure," Rev. 0 1
B. PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS
- PI-3201-001 " Engineering Evoluotion Preparation and Control"
! PI-3201-00 LOA " Audit Checklist for Engineering Evolvation Preparation and Control" i PI-3201-002 " Document Control Cover Sheet"
- PI-3201-0020A " Audit Checklist for Document Control Cover Sheet"
. PI-3201-008 " Preparation of Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports" l PI-3201-009 " Engineering Program Plan" l PI-3201-010 " External Communications: Preporation of Contact Log Sheets" I
i C. RESUMES
- O Rev.0 Iv TERA CORPORATION
O PQAP- 3201 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PROECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program P'GE A 1 of M
- l. GENERAL 1.1 Purpose The Project Ovality Assurance Plan (PGAP) establishes, describes, and defines the documented, auditable, control measures to be imple-mented to ensure occurate engineering evoluotions, correct calculo-tional procedure end onolysis, and correct dato application for the Midland independent Design and Construction Verification Program (IDCV) for Consumers Power Company (CPC).
1.2 Scope Ouality Assurance (OA) requirements shall be applied to engineering design and construction evoluotions, onolyses, computer analyses, calculation preparation, documentation and the development of findings and final reports. The specific activities to which the PGAP opplies and the method of program opplication are os follows.
l.2.1 Engineering Evoluotions Engineering evoluotions required for project review activities associated with design and cons'truction verification shall be controlled through the use of Engineering Evoluotion Cover Sheets (see Project instruction PI-3201-001). Engineering evoluotions shall be performed by technically qualified individuals, and will be reviewed by on individual O
(
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN O
V PQAP- 3201 PROACT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 2 of 23 having qualifications at least sufficient to perform the evoluotion. The Engineering Evolvation Cover Sheet shall include o document control number and shall also identify the specific source of technical dato and references for information used in the evoluotion. Where calculations are required to be performed to support the engineering evoluotion, these shall be controlled in occordance with Section 1.2.3.
Engineering evoluotions shall be maintained in files at the Bethesda, Maryland offices of TERA for the duration of the project.
l.2.2 Document and Report Preparation Documents such as open, confirmed and resolved item reports, finding reports, draf t and final reports that are prepored in the course of this project shall be controlled in occordance with Project Instruction PI-3201-002 through the use of Document Control Cover Sheets. These documents shall be prepared by technically qualified individuals and shall be reviewed by onother individual familiar with the project.
This review may be performed by the Project Manager. The Document Control Cover Sheet shall have a document control number and shall also identify the sources of information for development of these documents.
O l
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 3 d 23 1
Documents and reports prepared during this project shall be maintained in files at the Bethesda, Maryland offices of TERA for the duration of the project.
l.2.3 Calculations, Analyses and Computer Analyses (l) Final calculations, onolyses and computer analyses that are performed for purposes of confirmatory evoluotion of i
the Midland design or design bases shall be prepared and controlled in occordonce with ECP-5.2, "Colculation Pre-paration and Control."
O V (2) Calculations shall be controlled through the use of calcu-lotion cover sheets as described in ECP-5.2.
(3) Final calculations shall be kept of the Bethesda, Maryland of fices of TERA for the duration of the project.
l.2.4 Source / Reference Material Source or reference material obtained from Consumers Power Company or other organizations used in performing the engineering evoluotions, calculations, analyses, computer
- onalyses or document preparation for this project shall be maintoined in a file at the Bethesda, Maryland offices of TERA for the duration of the project. Control of this material shall be provided by use of file registers that list the O
\
o PROJECT QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PLAN NJ PQAP- 3201 PMCT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and !
REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program l P Y ,E 4 d 23 l Information contained in that file, including date or revision.
These files require use of signout sheets for material removed from the file.
, 1.3 Implementation 1.3.1 This Project Ovality Assurance Plan is to be implemented, as applicable, by all individuals assigned responsibility for per-formance of technical, managerial, and administrative func-tions related to the Ouolity Assured Activities identified previously.
\
1.3.2 The first issue, Revision 0, is effective and shall be imple-mented on date of issue. All activities are to be in compliance from that date.
l.3.3 Revisions shall be implemented within ten (10) worl<ing days of the date of issue of the revision.
1 4
- 2. ORGANIZATION 2.1 Project Organization Figure I provides the orgonizational chart for the subject Project.
Technical and administrative personnel (not shown) will receive
+
ossignments directly from the Project Manager (PM). The Project
l l
O
\/
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 NM: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 5 of 23 Manager will serve os the point of contoct with Consumers Power Company. The Project Ovality Assurance Engineers will report directly to the Executive Vice President, but will work with the Project Manager in resolving deficiencies or making recommendo-tions.
2.2 Authority and Responsibility L2.1 The Principal-in-Charge (PIC) is responsible for helping establish the general philosophy of review, setting forth guidance to the Project Monoger and the Lead Technical
( Reviewers (LTR), ossisting as on interface with the Senior Review Team (SRT), NRC and Consumers Power Company and reviewing / concurring in all final reports issued to Consumers Power Company.
2.2.2 The Project Manager is responsible for planning and direct supervision of all in-house activities undertaken as required to fulfill the contract requirements. All documentation, correspondence, reports, calculations, etc., issued to Consumers Power Company are to be issued under his signo-ture or otherwise receive his approval as required by the applicable Engineering Control Procedure or Project Instruc-tion.
2.2.3 The Project Manager is responsible for pionning and overall management of all outside activities performed by Asso-O l
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company (O Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 6 of 23 clates, but may delegate responsibility for supervision to other individuals within the project. This delegation of authority and responsibility is documented by issuance of a Project Instruction. Documentation may be issued to the subcontractor or associato under the signature of the desig-noted individual, but shall receive prior opproval of the Project Manager.
f 2.2.4 As requested by the PIC, the Senior Review Team (SRT) is responsible for the review of Open, Confirmed or Resolved (OCR) Items, findings and final reports to assess the techni-col validity and significance of project team conclusions and the proper classification of OCRs and findings. The SRT may of any time recommend to the Principol-in-Chorge that the Project Monoger expand the scope of review, provide clarifi-cation or reassess elements of the review.
2.2.5 The Lead Technical Reviewers (LTR) are responsible for management and implementation of all review activities within their discipline of review, including supervision of Individuals on the project team and outside activities per-formed by Associates. The LTRs report to the Project Monager. The LTRs are responsible *or the classification of OCRs and findings, the preparation of finding reports and finding resolution reports.
i
i PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN O PQAP- 3201 PROACT: Consumers Pawer Company
)
I Midland Independent Design and l REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PiAGE 7 of 23 2.2.5 The Project Ovality Assurance Engineer is responsible for verificotton of the implementation of the POAP and will perform oudits of applicable procedures and instructions implementation in accordance with Section 6.3 and ECP-5.6.
{
2.2.7 Lines of communication for identified deficiencies shall be in 1 occordance with ECP 5.15, " Corrective Action Procedure."
\
- 3. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTROL 3.1 Management Personnel 1 3.1.1 Principol-in-Chorge - John W. Beck Mr. Beck has broad experience in operations, systems, engi-neering, environmental, and licensing areas of the nuclear power industry. He is on of ficer of TERA Corporation. A copy of his resume is presented in Appendix C and provides documentory evidence of his qualifications.
3.1.2 Project Manager - Howard A. Levin f
Mr. Levin has brood experience in the areas of nuclear plant engineering and licensing as well as monoging engineering projects, has been selected by the Executive Vice President as Project Manager for the subject project. A copy of his
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN O PQAP- 3201 REW 0 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Program DATE: 11/11/82 PAGE 8 of 23 resume is presented in Appendix C and provides documentory evidence of his qualifications.
3.l.3 Project Ovality Assurance Engineer - Charles E. Lemon, P.E.
Mr. Lemon has brood experience and is highly qualified in the creo of nuclear power plant quality assurance and hos been selected by the Executive Vice President as Project Ovality Assurance Engineer for the subject contract. A copy of his resume is presented in Appendix C and provides documentory evidence of his qualificottons.
3.l.4 Lead Technical Reviewers The Lead Technical Reviewers (LTR) have been selected based upon their unique technical and management qualifico-tions for the project. The following lists the LTRs along with a short description of their creas of expertise. Copies of their resumes are presented in Appendix C, providing docu-mentory evidence of their qualifications.
Lead Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Curt Staley Nuclear power plant structural, Structural Review and mechanical design, construction Construction Verification project management and control n
l p
v PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REY.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE _ 9 of 23 l
Leod Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Frank Dougherty Nuclear power plant mechanical Mechanical Review design, safety and reliability analysis, system design /criterio development Richard Snoider Nuclear power plant operations, Systems Review maintenance and design, systems engineering, licensing project management, mechanical engineering Lionel Bates Nuclear power plant electrical, Electrical Review instrumentation and control systems design, equipment quali-p fication, plant operations and V maintenance 3.1.5 Senior Review Team The Senior Review Team (SRT) has been selected based upon their many years of experience in the nuclear in'dustry, broad creas of personal knowledge, and specific nuclear design review expertise. The following lists the SRT members along with a short description of their areas of expertise. Copies of their resumes are presented in Appendix C providing documentary evidence of their qualification.
SRT Member Functional Areas of Expertise Donald Davis Nuclear safety and licensing, plant and reactor systems, thermal-hydraulic onolysis, accident analysis O
g PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
'd PQAP- 3201 PROACT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 10 of 23 SRT Member Functional Areas of Expertise William J. Hall Engineering onalysis and design, structural engineering, struc-tural mechanics and dynamics, 4
soil mechanics, f rocture mechamics, engineering criterio development for major projects Robert Wilson Nuclear power plant operations, engineering and design, licensing project monogement '
3.1.6 LTRs are controlled and their performance evoluoted under direct supervision of the Project Monoger who provides input to the Principol-in-Chorge for his review and concurrence.
3.l.7 Monagement control is provided by the Executive Vice Presi-dent through review of project reports, audit findings, and evoluotions conducted in the normal course of business.
i 3.2 Pro]ect Personnel 3.2.1 Stoff technical and administrative personnel are selected by i the Project Manager or LTRs as required, based on their qualifications and orcos of expertise, to perform and/or coordinate the performance of activities undertaken in ful-fillment of contract requirements.
J i
p i
O PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Q PQAP- 3201 PROACT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE__lL. of _.2L.
3.2.2 The following lists the various TERA technical personnel that may participate in this project and the functional areas
- where each will provide input to the project. This . listing shall in no way restrict the personnel used u' y TERA to j ,
complete this project. The Project Manager or LTRs may assign personnel in addition to those listed below; however, these other personnel must have qualifications that are odequate to the extent required for performing the specific task.
1 Technical Reviewer Functional Areos of Expertise Robert Cudlin Nuclear soiety and licensing, reoctor safegoords, plant and containment systems, equipment qualification Henry George Quality assurance, trainlag, nuclear plant systems procedures, project management ,
Joseph Mortor_e Nuclear power plant structural, mechanical design and cc.nstruc-tion, equipment qualification, i operating reactor safety, licens-ing, project management Robert Snyder Nuclear power plant design and -
construction, project monoae / ,
mint, stort-up and operatigs -
Michael Aycock Nuclear power plant syst[ms, operating procedures, licensing
. and project management
, e ,
, h _,
, w
+
, , y .,
a l b
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN g
U PQAP- 3201 PRO.ECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program of _.2L-PAGE _.12 -
Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Christion Mortgot Engineering mechanics, earthquake engineering Yorma Arros Engineering mechanics Kenneth Campbell Soil mechanics, earthquake engineering Normon Berube Design and analysis of mechanical systems, thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, engineering, onolyses Frederick Berthrong Engineering project management, i
planning, scheduling and field engineering Leonard Stout Design, construction, stort-up and operations project control, schedule and cost control systems Susan Sly Civil /mechanicol design and construction, installation ond inspection Richard MocDonald Engineering, construction, opero-tion, maintenance and project management systems, nuclear plant start-up and operations Sidney Brown Engineering and construction ;
monogement, cost and scheduling, i quality control, field engineering Y
i
i PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 13 of M Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise F Donald Tulodieski Project management / control, start-up testing, engineering Richard Keller Electrical. Instrumentation, and contro' sy; tems design, nuckar power piant operational onalysis, plant protection systems /
engineered safety features evoluotion, probabilistic risk assessment Gary Smith Civil engineering, design and analysis, hydraulics, project management O 3.2.3 Staff personnel are controlled and their performance evolu-oted under direct supervision of the LTRs who provide input to the PM for his review and concurrence.
3.3 Associates 3.3.1 Associates are selected by the LTRs and Project Monager as required to perfo;m activities requiring specific detailed, state-of-the-art knowledge of selected scientific and engi-neering specialties.
3.3.2 Associates are controlled by direct supervision of the LTRs with assistance os required by other stoff personnel.
O
1 p PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROACT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE __1_4_ of 23 l 3.3.3 The following lists the various TERA associate personnel that
- are expected to participate in this project and the functional oreas where each will provide input to the project. This listing shall in no way restrict the personnel used by TERA to complete this project. The LTRs or Project Manager mov ossign personnel in addition to those listed below; however, these other personnel must have quellfications that are odequate to the extent required for performing the specific task.
Associate Functional Areas Monte Wise Engineering and project manage-ment, preservice/ inservice inspection, NDE, nuclear power plant operations and monogement, quality assurance Mehmet Celebi Nuclear power plant structural, mechanical design and construction Stan Fabic Thermal-hydraulic and hydo-elostic onolysis, computer methods development (authored BLODWN-2, WHAM, G ASRAD, MULTIFLEX),
pipe rupture analysis, containment analysis Albert Marfore Engineering, specification, con-struction fabrication, construction management and control, schedul-ing, supervision, inspection O
l l
o PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN !
PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and i REV.: 0 DAE 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PdGE . _15 . of 23 Associate Functlonal Areas
- John Angelo Design, operation, maintenance, installation, testing and inspec-tion of power plant systems and components, nuclear safety and licensing Joseph Penzien Structural engineering, carth-quake engineering, reinforced concrete response ,
Daniele Veneziano Engineering statistical onalysis, probabilistic analysis, civil engineering e Marfin Jones Nuclear power plant construction monogement, quality control, training, stort-up, electrical engineering Lenny Lookso Structurol/ mechanical analysis and design of nuclear power plant buildings and equipment, specifico-tions, planning and scheduling
- 4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL 4.1 Subject File The following numbers shall be used as subject file numbers to identify controlled documents in that file. Documents in a file shall have on I.D. number that includes the subject file number followed by o unique sequence number (001-999).
O
l 1
- PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program 16 g 23 PAGE l
l File Number Subject File
. 3201-001 Engineering Evoluotions ;
3201-002 Documents and Reporis 3201-003 Calculations, Analyses, Computer Analyses 3201-004 PGAP i
3201-005 Guality Assurance Documents 32C i-006 Personnel Ovolifications I 3201-007 Correspondence File 3201-008 Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports, Finding Resolution i
Reports 3201-009 Engineering Progtom Plon 3201-010 External Communications (Contoct Log Sheets)
! 3201-011 Source Documents i
4.2 Engineering Evoluotions i Engineering evoluotions are controlled in compliance with the requirements of Project Instruction PI-3201-C11, " Engineering Evol-uotion Preparation and Control."
i i
O l
1 l
1
PROJECT QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROKCT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REY.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 17 of 23 4.3 Documents and Reports Documents and reports are controlled in compliance with the require-ments of Project Instruction PI-3201-002, " Document Control Cover Sheet."
4.4 Calculations, Analyses, Computer Analyses Calculations, Analyses and Computer Analyses are controlled in compliance with the requirements of ECP-5.2, Calculation Preparo-tion and Control. The Project identifier is the Project No. os listed on the cover sheet previously.
4.5 PGAP The PGAP is controlled in compliance with ECP-5.5, Project GA Plan Preparation and Control. For this project, the PGAP Register, Attachment A, will be maintained by the Project Monoger.
4.6 Ouolity Assurance Documents Ovality Assurance Audit reports, responses, follow-up documents, etc., are controlled in compliance with ECP-5.6, "Ovolity Assurance Audits."
O
! PROJECT QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PLAN
' Cs PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 18 of 23 .
4.7 Engineering Control Procedures Engineering Control Procedures (other than those identified in Sec-tion 5) and revisions are controlled by revision of the PGAP os required to effect their implementation of the direction of the Project Manager.
4.8 Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Findino Resolution Reports Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports are controlled in complionce with the requirements of Project Instruction PI-3201-008; Preparation of Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports."
4.9 Correspondence and Personnel Ouolifications Correspondence, including letters and memos shall be routed to oppropriate personnel indexed using the oppropriate correspondence file register (Attachment B-l (TERA to CPC, NRC), B-2 (CPC to TERA), B-3 (NRC to CPC), B-4 (Misc.), B-5 (CPC to Bechtel), B-6 (NRC to Bechtel), B-7 (Bechtel to CPC), B-8 (CPC to NRC), B-9 (Bechtel to TERA) and filed in the oppropriate project controlled subject file number 3201-007. The document file control stomp, example shown on Attochment C, shall be used to identify project related correspondence and other documents not covered by specific procedures, such as Personnel qualification related records, file 3201-006.
O V
j PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
, PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 1 DATE: 1/17/83 Construction Verification Program of 23 . .
l PAGE _19 4.10 Project Instructions Project instructions are issued by the Project Manager os required and are controlled by assignment of a sequence identification number in the following formot: .
Pi - 3201 - XXX h A d Sequence number (001-999) 1 Project No.
Project Instruction V and by revison of the PGAP as required to effect their implemento-tion.
4.ll External Communications Records of telephone conversations and meetings between IDCV pro-ject personnel and external porties are controlled in compliance with the requirements of Project Instrument PI-3201-010; External Communications: Preparation of Contact Log Sheets.
- 5. PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS S.I Engineering Control Procedures The following ECP's are hereby implemented for the subject project:
I
l PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN bx PQAP- 3201 PROICT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE _._2JL of M (1) ECP-5.2," Calculation Preparation and Control" (2) ECP-5.5, " Project GA Plan Preparation and Control" (3) ECP-5.6, "Ouolity Assurance Audits" (4) ECP-5.15, " Corrective Action Procedure" A copy of the implemented revision for each applicable ECP is attached, Appendix A.
5.2 Project Instructions 5.2.1 F_ ; pose Project Instructions are prepared, under direction of the Project Manager, for the control of special octivities not covered by any of the standard ECPs, or to clarify, expond, or otherwise supplement the standard procedures to. provide more oppropriate control for o specific activity.
5.2.3 Format Project Instructions are prepared by the Project Manager or his designated representative. The Project Instruction con-sists of a form page cover sheet (s) including statement of purpose, method of implementation, and exception procedure.
lO l
l v i
i l
PROJECT QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PLAN lbm PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Comoany r
Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE 21 of 23 The working document (s) being implemented by the Project Instruction is listed as on attachment to the Project Instruc-tion cover sheet.
5.2.4 Verification and Approval (1) Project Instructions not related to on implemented ECP require the review and approval of the Project Monoger only.
(2) Project Instructions related to on implemented ECP are reviewed by the PGAE prior to issue. This review is noted by the PGAE's initials in the " Approved By:" block of the form.
5.2.5 Document Control Project Instructions are identified as in Porograph 4.10 pre-viously and issued as a revised appendix to all holders of controlled copies of the PGAP.
l 5.2.6 Project'!nstructions 1 The following Project Instructions are hereby implemented for this project.
(1) PI-3201-001, " Engineering Evoluotion Preparation and Control."
O i
l I
PROJECT QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PLAN O PQAP- 3201 PRO. LECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REY.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program 4
4 PAGE1 of M (2) PI-3201-00 LOA, " Audit Checklist for Engineering Evoluo- l tion Preparation and Control."
(3) PI-3201-002, " Document Control Cover Sheet."
(4) PI-3201-09020A, " Audit Checklist for Document Control Cover Sheet" (5) PI-3201-008, " Preparation of Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports."
O (6) PI-3201-009, " Engineering Program Plon."
(7) PI-3201-010, " External Communications: Preparation of Contact Log Sheets."
Copies of the implemented revisions of these project instruc-tions is ottoched, Appendix B.
~
- 6. QUALITY ASSURANCE 6.1 Records l
All quality assurance checklists, audit reporis and records document-ing activities related to the Quality Assured Activities of Section 1.2 i
I O
l l
PROJECT QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Desi,n g and REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 Construction Verification Program PAGE _ 23__ of 23 j herein are retained and controlled as specified herein and in occord-once with the pertinent requirements of the opplicable Engineering l Control Procedure and Project lastructions.
I 6.2 Corrective Action l
l For significant conditions adverse to quality, corrective action token is documented and resolved in accordance with Engineering Control Procedure ECP-5.15, " Corrective Action Procedure."
6.3 Audits Ouolity assurance audits of project operations are conducted by the PGAE in occordance with ECP-5.6, " Quality Assurance Audits." For this project, on audit shall be performed within 30 days of comple-i tion.
4 I
1 4
0
O PROJECT ORGANIZATION MIDLAto INDEPEPOENT DESIGN Ato CONST;tOCTION VERIFICATION I-NUCLEAR REGULATORY CONSUMERS POWER COMMISSION COMPANY I I I I I I
- a. - - - - - - - - - - - - .a i
I
'" SENIOR REVIEW TEAM
--"'m'*k"fj07syff*"5 PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Donald Davis
""" gygpg gNgT8?N John Beck William Hall or moxcn Robert Wilson O
PROJECT QA PROJECT MANAGER Chuck Lemon Howard Levin STRUCTURAL REVIEW SYSTEMS REVIEW ELECTRICAL REVIEW Curt Staley Richard Snaider Lionel Bates CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL REVIEW -
VERIFICATION Frank Dougherty Curt Staley O-FIGURE I
ATTACHMENT A, PQAP-3201 PGAP REGISTER Project Quality Assurance for Midland PROJECT NO. 3201 PGAP TITLE-IDCV Program for Consumers Power PAGE 1 of I Subject File No - 01-004 _
PGAP Sequence Distribution ik.AI
.- Revision and Date Number Rev. -
Date - !
Rev. -
Date -
~
Rev. -
Date -
l l
Rev. -
Date -
O C - Receipt Acknowledged (Use Checkmark)
. l
, G = _ _____ __ -. - - - - - - - -
1 ATTACHMENT B-1 PQAP-3201' i CORRESPOtOENCE FILE
, Consumers Power Company PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT ggggdepgdg(Dggn and PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (TERA to CPC, NRC)
Sequence No. Date From To Subject I'
- l v
l
ATTACHMENT B-2 i t
PQAP-3201 CORREWOtOENCE FILE
~
PROJ. NO. 3M1 PROJECT kibi$7Ind$ndh0$ belign and Construction Verification PAGE 1 of I SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (CPC to TERA)
Se nce No. Date From To Subject t
- v i I m'
a
\
V
ATTACHMENT B-3 PQAP-3201 CORREM CiOENCE FILE l Consumers Power Company PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT- Midland Independent Design and Constructinn verificatinn PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (NRC to CPC) -
Sequence No. Date From To Subject O
m i
4 1
l l
ATTACHMENT B-4 PQAQ-3201 CORRESPOtOENCE FILE I PROJECT ki0iE7}nd0pEdh8[P80{ign and PROJ. NO. 3201 C0"Str"ction Varifica+4nn PAGE l of I SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (Misc.)
Se nee No. Date From To Subject 9
l 6
i V'
ATTACHMENT B-5 PQAP-3201 CORRESPOtOENCE FILE PROJECT ki0iE72n$0Nndh0$P0e51gn and PROJ. NO. 3201 Construction Verification PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (CPC to Bechtel)
Date From To Subject Se nce No.
O -
ATTACHMENT B-6 PQAP-3201
- _ CORPEcPOtOENCE FILE PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT- MS0ia$75nb!$ndh0$Pbe51gn and Construction Verificatinn PeGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007(NRC to Bechtel)
Sequence No. Date From To Subject o
V i
O
l ATTACHMENT B-7 PQAP-3201 CORRESPOtOENCE FILE PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT. d0ia$75ndSpendhS$P0elign and Verification Construction I PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (Bechtel to CPC)
Date From To Subject !
Sequence No.
\
l 2
(
ATTACHMENT B-8 PQAP-3201
_l CORRESPOtOENCE FILE PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT - 3hhgphd {gnand PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (CPC to NRC)
Date From To Subject Sequence No.
4 9
I O
. l ATTACHMENT B-9 PQAP-3201 1 CORRESPOtOENCE FILE 3201 PROJECT ki0lanfin00p!ndh0TP0elign and l PROJ. NO. Construction Verification PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 (Bechtel to TERA)
Date From To Subject Segoence No.
l C !
i :
1 I
i
ATTACHMENT C PGAP-3201 O _
L 1
l CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL l 1.D. NO. CC- -
'O i
O TERA CORPORATION
1 O
l :
APPEtOlX A ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURES -
O l
TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE MBJECT: ,
O ECP-5.2 REV.:2 DATE:7/1/81 CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL I
PAGE 1 OF 4 _
3 ,
/
- 1. PURPOSE ,
This procedure shall be followed in the preparation and control of calculo-tions, when required by the PGAP. Calculations are to be prepared as
! required to establish or verify designs, design parameters, design criterio, reduce dato, establish performance and economic porometers, and other-wise provide quantitative information in accordo .ce with occepted ano-lytical and mothematical methods.
- 2. PREPARATION 2.1 Eoch calculation shall be prepared folic, wing occepted engineering proctice and shall include problem statement, assumptions, basic criterio, dato and references, opplicoble codes, standards," major equation sources and the source of dersvation of ony uncommon equations introduced in the calculation.
2.2 References shall be listed and identified sufficiently to allow easy recovery. Title, author, copyright date, edition, etc., shall be included as necessary identification information.
2.3 Calculations shall be complete and orderly and shall include suf-ficient sketches, notes and explanatory information to allow ony person not familiar with the work, but technically qualified, to understand it without extensive additional inquiry and research.
/
2.4 All final calculations shall be rnode on stondord quorule sheets and stomped in the lower right corner with the calculations. stamp, j
Attachment B, with all required information completed by the orig-Inotor to the maximum extent possible. A calculation cover sheet, I
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
l f
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEOURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5. 2
^ CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.:2 DATE:7/1/81 N I PAGE 2 op 4
(( .
s, Attochment A, shall also be prepared as completely as possible and i l
ottoched as sheet I of each final calculation prior to verification and opproval. Computer calculations shall be identified by a calculation cover sheet with ottochments os necessary to define the calculation being performed, the assumptions and input dato used, basic mothe-motical models opplied and references as appropriate.
- 3. VERIFICATION AND APPROVAL 3.1 Calculations shall be designated as preliminary until verified by checking and signed by the Project Monoger or his designated representative, or until it determined that such review ond opproval is not required. Preliminary calculations not upgroded to final calculation status shall be maintained in a separate file for reference purposes by the Project Monoger or his designated representative.
Eoch final calculation shall be checked by on individual who has qualifications at least sufficient to originate the calculation. The checker shall not be the originator or the originator's immediate superior. After checking, which may include alternate or simplified calculative techniques, the checker shall sign and date the calcu-lotion cover sheet and each calculation sheet. Any comments shall be resolved with the originator prior to signoff. The calculation shall then be possed to the Project Monoger or his designated represen-totive for signoture. The Project Manager or his designated repre-sentative will sign only the cover sheet.
O B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
/ ..
i ENGINEERING CONTROL PROdEUOR:Eh'
~
~
<y 3UBJECT: -
l ECP-5.2 f(v l
REV.:2 DATE:7/1/81 _
cal.CULATION PREPARATIO*l AND CONTROL N
3 op 4 '
PAGE {-}
~
ut ,. r ,s q
^
~ , ,; , s '
\
~5 -
r
- 4. DOCUMENT CONTROL .
4.1 identification ,
Af ter all opprovals have been obtained, th9 finct co!culation sho!! be I
'ossigned a control identification number by thel- Project Mcnoger or c his designated representative in the followine,formot: -
- t . ; .
- ?
j XX_X-XXX-XX _( , , ,
h- A bSequence number , s ;
.e' Subject file identifier
. +
,/ , , Project identifier /,
, Project and-mbjeci file identifers are established in the PGAP. , ,
s, '
l , .
w s.
. ,s_
4.2., Retention . . , ~ . f t 7' The final calculation shal1 be indexed,,Attqchmont C, and filed in the ,
oppropriate project calculation tinder. Distribution shall not be ,I
- s .n .
made unless specific written instrjsetionsfore issued to the contrary.
All final colculations shall be nia;6 joined bY the Project Manager, or hi:, designated representative. ,
- 5. REVIS:ON5 '
/ 7
,; , ~ .
5.1 Revisions to final calculations shall be made, verified and opproved in
. the some rnanner os the viginal calculation. j
'; .s ,
,, /
/ ,
- i
\ ,
B-81-128 ,
,f y, - y-TERACORPORATION
~ ,
r,
-c d. 13 .
m ,_ .
. ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.2 I CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL
\ REV.:2 DATE:7/1/81 A (
! PAGE 4 OF 4 .
5.2 Superseded final calculations shall be so identified and transferred to
-a superseded calculation binder. The calculation index shall note this f action by completing the oppropriate blanks on the calculation index
,' sheets for the superseded calculation.
.t ,
l 6. OA AUDIT CTCKLIST l I
4 i 6.1 Audits of the implementation of this procedure shall be conducted by the PGAE using Audit Checklist ECP-5.2OA, Attochment D.
i x
2O 1
E.
0 l
i 1
0 l l
!'. , i i I q O..
B-81-128
~
TERACORPORATION
i ECP-5.2 Attachn nt A CALCULATION COVER SHEET TIT E CONT.10. NO.
NO. OF SHTS.
PROJECT j SUPERCEDES CALC. NO.
REVISION ORIGINATOR OATE VERIFIED BY OATE APPROVED BY OATE l REV. NO.
l l
l SUBJECT 4
PURPOSE SOURCES OF DATA, FORMULAE AND REFERENCES i
t 4
iO TERACORPORATION I (References may be Ested on a separate sheeo
~ ~
ECP-5.2 Attachment ts i
[
f 1
)
i l 4
i I
i CONT ROL ID. ND.
~
i i PREPARED BY/DATE
]
VERIFIED BY/DATE PAGE OF 4
i f
Id I
1 1
I I
I TERACORPORATION
1 ;Ill l E?" Cn 2eO E
T A
O D D
. E D
E Y
_ B W
E
._ T X A D
E
_ D N
I N
O O I T
A
- L U
C L
A C E L
T I
T N' O O
IN T .
O A0 L1 U.T CN L
4 Y9aOa $OZ i
- ! ' - i ;ilI' ! i!
- ii
~~
ECP-5.2 Attacnment u ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE MECT:
ECP-5.20A AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR CALCULATION DATE:7/l/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.:1 PA Y <
3 PAGE I OF
= ~
T.
1
- 1. PURPOSE This checklist shall be used by the PGAE to verify the implementation of c
ECP-5.2, Calculation Preparation and Control, for those calculations directly related to Quality Assured Activities as identified in the PGAP. It shall not be used for any other categories of calculations or types of l
octivities unless instructions to the contrary are established by the PGAP.
l
- 2. CFECKLIST 2.1 References?
[!
i l
2.2 Cofculation cover sheet and each page properly prepared and indentified 2.3 Verification and opproval signatures or initials?
2.4 Control and identification number per PGAP?
! 2.5 Calculation indexed and filed in loose i leaf binder?
2.6 Revisions processed in some manner as original?
2.7 Superseded calculations identified on index sheet and filed in separate binder?
l i
- O B-81-128 i TERACORPORATION l
ECP-5.2 Attachment D ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.2QA AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR CALCULATION DATE:7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.:1 2 l
PR Y: F 2 OF 3 PAGE
= .
- 3. COMMENTS 3.1 Identify calculation (s) used in preporing this checklist, state specific cause of any unsatisfoctory rotings, and recomrnend corrective oction, if any.
i .
I i
- O i
i i
4 3.2 Prepared by: Date:
i j
i i
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ECP-5.2 Attachment D ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5. 20A REV.:1 DATE:7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL 2
3 3 PR Y: ( I PAGE OF L
- 4. FOLLOWUP i
4.1 Recommended corrective action of item 3.1 satisfactority implemented?
4.2 If not, state other oction token to resolve the deficiency, or state rationale justifying no corrective action token, and if this item is open or closed.
i l
.O 4
l.
i 1
I
! l 4.3 Prepared by: Date:
O B-81-128 l
TERACORPORATION
l ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
l l ECP-5.3 J DRAWING PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 1 DATE:7/1/81 2 5
R ' '
] PAGE 1 OF
~
((. .
r
- 1. PURPOSE This procedure shall be followed for the preparation and control of drawings, when required by the PGAP. Drawings are prepared as reqired to graphically and/or pictorially describe physical location, size, geometric configuration, summarize dato or other technical parameters and char-octeristics, and include maps, figures, charts, tables and similar docu-ments.
- 2. PREPARATION 2.1 Each drawing shall be prepared following occepted engineering and drafting practice, under the direction of the Project Monoger or his Os designated representative by the drafting department.
2.2 Eoch drawing shall include o title block which provides necessary descriptive information such as drawing title, job number and/or name, client nome, physical scale, if opp!icable, legend and other pertinent information as established by the Project Monoger for each drawing or drawing type.
- Ci j U B-81-128 l
TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.3
" " ^"
REV.: 1 DATE:7/1/81 "I 5 PR Y: ( l PAGE OF l
1
- 2. For figures, tables and similar report related drawings; Figure XX.X.X h LReport text cross-reference Type, as established by report text (chart, table, graph, etc.)
- 3. For maps and geological drawings developed from maps; Map XX 0 Sequence number (01-99)
O Eoch drawing shall otso include the date of issue, as determined by the Project Monoger. The date shall appear directly below ihe title block, shall not be identified as "Dated , and shall be in the following formot:
X XX XX iTT day of month issued month issued lost digit of year issued example: November 23,1974 = 41123 1
4.2 Retention The drowing shall be indexed, Attochment B, and the original drawing retained by the draf ting department in suitable metal flat or tube files to prevent domoge and deterioration. The recorded copy shall be returned to the Project Monoger or his designated representative for filing in the oppropriate subject file.
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.3 O REV.: 1 DATE:7/1/81 PR Y: (
- PAGE A OF 5
= .
- . l The Project Drawing Index sheets, Attochment B, shall be retained by fl the drafting department in loose leaf binders.
~
! 4.3 Distribution i'
- Drawing shall be reproduced and distributed as directed by the Project Monoger or his designated representative. Distribution shall l
i be for information only and shall be uncontrolled.
! 5. REVISIONS i 5.1 Revisions to drawings sho!! be made os required under direction of the Project Monoger, or his designated representative.
5.2 Revisions will be reviewed, verified, record copy prepared, indexed, retained and distributed following the some control measures estob-lished for initial issue in the preceding sections.
- 5.3 Only the date code on the drawing shall be updated and recorded in
- Project Drawing Index under the next sequential revision date num-4 j ber.
- 5.4 Superseded original drawings shall be identified by the drafting department by writing near the title block " Superseded," and trans-ferred to separate storoge files. The Project Monoger or his l
designated representative shall remove superseded or outdated record copies from the subject files, write superseded on the copy, and transfer to o separate superseded record copy file.
.O B-81-128 1
TERACORPORATION
l ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.3 DRAWING PREPARATION AND CONTROL REWI DATE: 7/1/81 s T
PR Y; (
PAGE 5 OF 5
! = .
- 6. QA AUDIT CMCKLIST i
6.1 Audits of the implementation of this procedure shall be conducted by f
i the PGAE using Audit Checklist ECP-5.3 QA, Attochrnent C.
l i
l 4
O l
l i
f I
I f
I l
l l
l l
I l
l I
I B-81-128 TERACORPORATION l
Attachment A Page 1 of I ECP-5.3 l I
l l
'O l i
l RECORD COPY DWG. NO. SiEV DATE:
DRAWN BY i
APPROVED D A'E.
DA:GINATEC BY.
APPROVED: D F E.
PROJECT MANAGER APPROVED. DAT E:
J O
TERACORPORATION
ECP-5.3 attacnment o 8
CD f
O W
' k *
- : o i z l i O Ui t')
! 5
- w E
1 I
m i
1 i,
- X
- uJ
- O Z_
Z_
a O
- F- $
t-1 C H i
i 7 i O C
I Q.
i J
l 1
i 1 .
O
. Z i L9 z
a l
1 i ~ O 1 i I
, 1 l l l
i TER/. ORPORATION
ECP-5.3 Attachment C ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.3QA REV.: 1 DATE: 7/l/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL a I
PR Y: <
PAGE 1 OF 3 '
~ ~
5
- l. PURPOSE This checklist shall be used by the PGAE to verify the implementation of ECP-5.3, Drawing Preparation and Control, for those drawings directly related to Quality Assured Activities os identified in the PGAP. It shall
! not be used for any other categories of drawings or types of activities unless instructions to the contrary are established by the PGAP.
1
- 2. CFECKLIST 2.1 Drawing includes a title book with descriptive
- identifying information?
i 2.2 Record copy for the drawing signed, dated, 1 and filed?
2.3 Drawing properly identified and date code f opplied?
- 2.4 Drawing properly indexed and filed in metal i file cabinet?
I 2.5 Revisions to drawings processed some os origino! Issue?
f i 2.6 Superseded original drawings properly identified 1
ond filed separately?
l j 2.7 Record copies of superseded drowings properly identified and filed separately?
I O
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ECP-5.3 Attachment C ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE i
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.3QA AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR DRAWING
,O O REV.: 1 DATE: 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL >
PR Y: (
PAGE 2 op 3 .
, = .
l
- 3. COMMENTS I
3.1 Identify the drawing (s) used in preparing this checklist, state specific l
! cause of any unsatisfoetory ratings, and recommended corrective i oction, if any.
4 i
l i
i 1
O
)
i l
i j
l
'I t
3.2 Prepared by: Date:
- O
! B-81-128 i
l TERACORPORATION
L ECP-5.3 Attachment C ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.3QA AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR DRAWING REV.: 1 DATE: 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL PR Y: (
PACE 3 OF 3
- 4. FOLLOWUP
' ~
4.1 Recommended corrective action of item 3.1
! satisfactorily implemented?
4.2 If not, state other oction taken to resolve the deficiency, or state rationale justifying no corrective oction taken, and if this item is open or closed.
1 O
i i
l 4
r 4.3 Prepared by: Date:
- O B-81-128 I- T@gcCRPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
~
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN DATE: 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL ,
REV.: 3 PR Y; F PAGE 1 OF 7
_~ -
s, I
1.0 GEE RAL i l
i l.1 PURPOSE 4
This Engineering Control Procedure describes and defines the preparation requirements for the Project Quality Assurance Plan (PQAP). The PQAP is l I
required for any TERA project on which the corporate Quality Assurance Program is implemented, either by contract requirement or r . at deci-sion.
i i 1.2 SCOPE 4
This Engineering Control Procedure (ECP) describes and defines the preparation requirements for the Project Quality Assurance Plan (PQAP). The PGAP is i
required for any TERA project on which the corporate Quality Assurance
! Program is implemented, either by contract requirement or monogement deci-sion.
- l.3 EXCEPTIONS i
- In the event engineering or scientific oreos of endeavor are identified which are not odequately covered by existing ECPs with respect to Quality Assurance and Quality Control, the Project Manager shall advise corporate monogement and quality assurance personnel such that . scial procedures and/or instructions may be prepared to ougment standard proc . ores for the project in question. If this action is necessary, consideration shall be given by appropriate personnel to the preparation and implementation of such special procedures os corporate ston-dards, if they are deemed opplicable to future projects and the goals of overall corporate quality assurance policy.
O B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE .-
SUBJECT:
~
- PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAft PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 3 DATE: 7/1/81 ,
PR Y: I PAGE 2 OF 7
~ ~
T.
l 2.0 PQAP PREPARATION AND CONTROL 4
. 2.1 PGAP FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS f Eoch PGAP shall follow the organization as defined in the following subsections.
1
) 2.1.1 COVER SFEET The first page of each PGAP shall be o cover sheet which contains a heading identifying the document as the Project Quality Assurance Plan for o specific
> client, project nome and project number. In addition, space shall be provided for signatures of the preparer (Project Monoger), the Project Quality Assurance
- O Engineer (PGAE) and the executive monogement individual to which both parties report with regard to quality assurance activities specified by the PGAP. The s
cover sheet shall also contain space for identification of control copies, date of issue, and revision number for the PGAP.
2.l.2 POLICY STATEMENT The Project Monoger shall prepare o Policy Statement serving as a management
]
implementation directive for the PGAP on the project in question. This statement is generally free form, but shall, os a minimum, contain text carrying i the general policy message os indicated by the sompte Policy Statement, j Attochment A.
2.1.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS
' Following the Policy Statement each PGAP shall contain a Table of Contents identifying section numbers and page numbers for the contents of the PGAP.
l 4 B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.5 h
V REV.: 3 DATE: 7/1/81 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PREPARATION AND CONTROL ,
7 l PAGE 1 OF Eoch FQAP shall contain, os a minimum, those sections os shown in the sompte Table of Contents, Attochment B.
2.1.4 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Followirg the Table of Contents, the PGAP shall begin. Eoch page of the plan shall be prepared on the special heoder paper shown as Attochment C. The plan number shall correspond to the corporate contract or project designation number with the first revision issue of the document as Rev. O, and all subsequent revisions in increasing sequential numerical order. Eoch page of the plan shall be numbered sequentially, excluding appendices and ottochments which may apply for any given PGAP. These documents shall be numbered as separate entities.
The project title entered on each sheet in the header block spoce shall be consistent for all pages *n the PGAP.
2.2 PGAP DETAILED CONTENTS The following subsections describe in greater detail the content requirements for o minimum Project Quality Assurance Plan.
2.2.1 GEbERAL The first section of the PGAP shall be entitled General, and shall contain a statement of the purpose of the plan and identification of the octivities requiring specific quality assurance and quality control functions for the project in question. Eoch section describing on engineering or scientific function requiring quality control measures shall identify opplicoble ECPs which are mandatory during that operation to provide odequate quality assurance and quality control.
The octual ECPs to be implemented, os identified in these sections of the PGAP, l
( B-81-128 l l
TERACORPORATION
I I
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
~
- PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 3 DATE: 7/1/81 ,
PR Y: I PAGE 4 OF 7 3,
I shall be ottoched as appendices to the plan when issued for o client's review and approval. In addition, any quality assurance related areas not covered by existing procedures shall be identified, and special instructions shall be defined and implemented as required.
The General section of the PGAP shall also contain required statements regarding implementation of the PGAP as to schedule, issue of revisions and their effective date, and those individuals responsible for compliance with the plan for the project in question. Identification of individuals may be by nome or function.
e 2.2.2 ORGANIZATION A description of the project organization which identifies individuals, their relative responsibility, and lines of outhority and communication shall be described in this section. An Organization Chart shall be prepared and ottoched to the PGAP to clarify this discussion (see sompte Organization Chart, Attach-ment D). The discussion shall center on the authority and responsibility of important project personnel, particularly the Project Monoger and Project Goolity Assurance Engineer. In addition, general discussions of corrective actions and communication lines between project personnel, corporate mocoge-ment and designated client personnel shall be defined. When opplicable, this discussion shall identify any ECPs required to effectively carry out assigned outhorities and responsibilities.
'O B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.5 O REV.: 3 DATE: 7/1/81 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PREPARATION AND CONTROL 7
PR y, c PAGE 5 OF 2.2.3 PERSONbEL QUALITIFICATIONS AND CONTROL This section of the PGAP shall contain three major subsections os follows:
- 1. Monogement Personnel l
- 2. Project Personnel
- 3. Associate Personnel 1
Eoch section shall introduce, identify and briefly describe the experience and capabilities of important project personnel. These sections should refer to resumes which are to be ottoched as appendices to the PGAP to further identify, clarify and document the competence and copobility of personnel involved on the project. It should be emphasized in this section that discussion of personnel is in no we,y intended to serve os o qualification statement for occeptobility for the l
project. Technical competence and acceptability of TERA project personnel and associates by the client for the project in question is a contractual issue, and its resolution is concurrent with contract issuance. The information provided in this section is only for the purpose of establishing clearly identified lines of communication and authority between responsible TERA and client personnel.
2.2.4 ADMINISTRATlVE CONTROL i
This section of the PGAP shall contain information identifying the procedures and/or instructions which will be implemented to control documentation gener-oted on the project which is subject to quality assurance and control measures.
In most cases, ECPs implemented in previous sections ossociated with quality assured octivities will contain control procedures for the documents they generate. However, there may be cases in which special instructions are O B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
l \
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
(
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.5 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN I REv.: 3 DATE: 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL ,
1 PR Y: F PAGE ft 0F 7 required, either by client request or project monogement decision, to cover special document handling situations. These shall be pointed out specifically in the administrative control section. This section shall otso identify and introduce any project instruction, numbering identification scheme or other special odmin-istrative features required for odequate control of project documents. At the Project Monoger's discretion, this section may also contain information regarding I
subtask identification within the project for accounting and task scheduling and control functions. Although this information may not be essential from o quality assurance and quality control standpoint, in some cases it may impoet critical work areas, and therefore, may be included in the PGAP.
2.2.5 PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS
,O This section of the PGAP shall specifically identify each Engineering Control Procedure colled out in other sections of the PGAP. This identification shall be by procedure number, title and revision. It shall also identify and refer to the oppendices of the PGAP which will contain the current revision of applicable ECPs.
This section of the PGAP shall also contain detailed instructions for the development and implementation of Project Instructions, if required to augment existing procedures. The Project Monoger is ultimately responsible for prepara-
- tion of any required Project Instructions, and the formct and methodology of this issuance shall be coordinated with the client.
4 2.2.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE This section of the PGAP shall identify the method of implementation of quality assurance functions in a manner specific to the subject project, shall specify B-81-128 l
l g
TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
i ECP- 5.5 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN i
DATE: 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 3 2 PR Y: (
PAGE 7 OF 7 l
I those quality assurnnce related records subject to retention and control, and 1 i
shall define the responsibility for and resolution of corrective actions issued as o result of quality assurance oudits. Appro',riate ECPs and/or Project Instructions shall be identified and implemented for the quality assurance audit functions, corrective action function, and record control function, os required.
This section will otso present the project oudit schedule. The Project Monoger and the Project Quality Assurance Engineer ore responsible for developing and maintaining the audit schedule. The audits may be project-wide or by activity as defined in PQAP.
i 2.3 PQAP CONTROL The Project Manager is responsible for the preparation of the PGAP and shot!
retain control of any necessary revision of the PQAP opplicable to the project.
l The original and each revision of the PGAP shall be verified by the project PGAE prior to issuonce.
The original and each revision of the POAP shall be opproved by the Executive Vice President prior to issvonce. ,
l
\
l 0
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
I iI
?.
Attachment A POLICY STATEMENT e
5
- In conjunction with the corporate Quality Assurance Program, this Project Quality Assurance Plan has been prepared to establish the measures necessary to l
! provide odequate confidence in and assurance of the quality of services to be j provided for the Company in the performance of octivities involved in the conduct of the Project. To that end, the
! quality assurance / quality control methods, procedures and instructions estob-lished herein shall be implemented, os opplicoble, by those Individuals assigned l
, responsibility for the activities requiring quality assurance and control as identified herein. Any deviations, exceptions, or other non-conformances shall be brought to my ottention for resolution.
Project Monoger t
O
! B-81-128
'u e
J Attochment B 1
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
^
Pooe
- 1. GtEE RAL 4
1.1 Pu rpo se . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2 Quality Assured Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l.3 Imp le men t a t ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 2. ORGANIZATION q 2.1 Project Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j 2.2 Authority and Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
- 3. PERSONEL QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTROL 3.1 Monogement Persmne! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 3.2 Projec t Personne l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
- 3.3 A ssoc ia te s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
, 4.1 Ca lcu la t ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 4.2 Dr a w i ng s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3 PGAP.................................................
4.4 Quality Assurance Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l i
4.5 Engineering Control Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.6 Project Instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I 5. PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS d
5.1 Engineering Control Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2 Project Instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
]
B-81-128 1
1
J r. , , ,
, < t, ,
I
< t .
( , ,
i i
% )
V '
1, 7
A A.
Attochment B (cont'd) >
s */ .
); .
T e7' _ 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) ..
.s
- Poae s
~ \
- 6. QUALITY ASSURANCE :
, , 1 6.1 R ec or d s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y . . ,
6.2 Correc t ive Act ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'.' s 1'
6.3 Audits..............................................,... . '
i .
i
- FIGURES i
1 ;
. s~
i j Figure I: PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART .< O, s
s j
.i l APPENDICES
] A. ENGibEERING CONTROL PROCEDURES j ECP-5.2 - Calculation Preparation and Control ECP-5.2GA - Audit Checklist for Calculation Preparation and Contro! ,
- ECP-5.3 - Drawing Preparation and Control i '
ECP-5.JOA - Audit Checklist for Drawing Preparation and Control . .,
. ECP-5.5 - Project GA Plan Preparation and Control 9 I
ECP-5.6 - Quality Assurance Audits '
! : L B. RESUMES
~ l t
eg B-81-128 T
j.
i ECP-5.5 ' At'tachm:nt C ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
' bO
! ECP-
- e .-
' REV.: ' DATE. l
.PAGE OF
+
F i ,
- t. 3' 't, s s
3 y q' .
g i
- }
+
g
- ', r t i t
- h
['
i k '
< x
.s 1 9
%^
( '
r 4
1 2
3 \
j.k 4
i ,.
7'% i, i ' ? {
l 6
i .
t i t7 .
i N, n \ :
.s 4
l 'I' k i '
.. .\ -
i s
s I, % ',.
- I,' '; e .
-r- a -_. . __ _ . _ _.
TERACO,RPORATION _ _ _
O o s
9
'i
-\ . .s
-~.. , ,
Robert W.Felton t Executive - - ,
Vice President ,
e-'
.g Client ,
Project Quality Project Manager Project Manager ,
Assurance Engineer _- - 1 s e ;, 3
% e
- a1
' ' ^
=,e,
- s
.- ,, n. g l
~
o- t
, s.
1 I \
4 Administrative Associate Stoff Technical and
' Staff Editorial Support
% 1 3 ,,
k "U
- 3 1
' FIGURE l .
PROKCT r.RGANIZATON i;
4
$ '\.
i ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
( ECP-5.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS REV.:3 DATE:7/1/81 a PAGE 1 OF 4 i 1. PURPOSE
- 1.1
< This procedure shall be followed for the performance of Guolity Assurance Audits when required by the POAP and in conformance with oudit schedules os defined in the PGAP. Quality Assurance Audits are required on those projects which provide o product that relates directly to the design of safety-related structures, systems and components or chorocteristic evolvations and analyses which offect these safety-related structures, systems and components. The PGAP estoalishes quality assured octivities and the opplicability of procedures and instructions to those activities.
1.2 Audits of internal project operations shall be conducted over the duration of the
- contract to
(1) Provide objective evidence of compliance with the project i requirements os defined by the PGAP.
(2) Determine the odequocy of the PGAP plan.
(3) Verify implementation of recommended corrective oction, j os required.
i -
l lO B-81-128 l TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE l
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.6 QUAL.ITY ASSURANCE AUDITS REv.:3 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 2 OF 4
= -
- 2. IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 The PGAE shall schedule, conduct, document, make recommendations and findings, initiate corrective action, and follow-up on Ovality Assurance Audits os necessary to verify the implementation of the PGAP as required by the TERA Quality Assurance Program.
- 3. GA AUDIT Cl-ECKLIST 3.1 Audits of the implementation of procedures specified for implementation in the PGAP shall be conducted by the PGAE using Audit Checklists opplicable to those procedures. Specifically, Audit Checklists ECP-5.20A, Os " Audit Checklist for Calculation Preparation and Control" and ECP-5.3QA,
" Audit Checklist for Drawing Preparation and Control" are identified for use.
- 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DOCUMENTATION 4.1 The PGAE shall prepare on Audit Report upon completion of coch audit, which shall include all Audit Checklists used during the audit, o summary description of the audit and results, and any audit findings requiring corrective action. Audit Findings shall be recorded using the oppropriate Audit Finding Form (AFF), Attochment A. The report shall be distributed by memorondum for information and necessary corrective oction to oppro-priate levels of monogement and the Project Manager, and shall be o controlled document.
O B-81-128 TERACORPORATION l
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
{') ECP-5.6
SUBJECT:
QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS I
REV.:3 DATE:7/1/81 2 PAGE 3 OF 4
=
((-
5
- 5. CORRECTIVE ACTION 2
5.1 Any and all nonconformances, deviations and audit findings and exceptions requiring corrective action shall be resolved through the issuance of a Corrective Action Memo (CAM). The CAM shall be prepared by the Project Monoger in response to the issvonce of on Audit Finding, and shall be issued to the PGAE for acceptance. Af ter final occeptance, the PGAE shall return a signed copy of the CAM to the Project Monoger for record.
Attochment B to this procedure provides a sample Corrective Action Memo.
! 6. FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS O
6.1 The Project Monoger or his designated representative shall prepare audit finding responses in the form of CAMS as required and shall submit them to the PGAE for occeptance. Upon completion of all action, on Audit Resolution Report shall be issued by the PGAE which shall include all opplicable CAMS, a summary of corrective oct*ons token and oil closed out audit findings. Any follow-up oction or odditional oudits to verify audit
- responses, if required, shall be designated in the Audit Resolution Report and distributed to the Project Monoger and oppropriate levels of manage-ment for information. The Audit Resolution Report is a controlled i
document.
l l
O B-81-128 i %
TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.6
^ ^$ ^
REV.:3 DATE:7/1/81 ,
PAGE 4 OF 4 ~ '
g_
T.
. 7. DOCUMENT CONTROL 7.1 IDENTIFICATION After all resolutions have been obtained, final Audit Reports and Audit Resolu-tion Reports shall be assigned control identificotton numbers by the PGAE or his designated representative in the following format:
- XXX-XXX-E n a a Sequence number i QA file identifier Project identifier l
Project and subject and QA file identifiers are I
established in the PGAP.
I 7.2 RETENTION The final reports shall be indexed and filed oppropriately in the project Quality Assurance file. Distribution shall not be mode unless specific written instruc-
' tions are issued to the contrary. All final reports shcIl be maintained by the PGAE, or his designated representative. l l
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
' pgnEWT A i
., .i*-
AUDIT FINDING N0. utn l 0
h t arria:ts SA00P AUDITED THOSE CONTACTED
.' At CPR 80 APet elt 0 CAlftRIA IS$UED TO AUDIT FINDING tvu ac unus:: monam uns u ustan)
I t
I I DISCUSSION tust ac unuct amnix wns u uxtu:) l RECOMMENDATION lust ac unuct aunis uns u atwtus) i
- \
AUDITED BY- #T1 Distalwfam em 7:vi' b
V m itt0 81 MT!
TITLE tas
!$5Jt0 SY Tats pra ans TERACORPORATION i
l I _ . _
ECP-5.5 ,
ATTAC8 MENT S , l AUDIT FINDING - CORRECTIVE ACTION MEMO l
- no:.:t:T \
A > l l
. (.
$!,$"E"n'[8 p arttuni 1.* CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO RESOLVE AUDIT FINDING 1 I
i k
1 ACTIOh TAEh BT PAIPAAID 31 N'L
, hMC aNC VTL ACT!0h vtRIFit0 ST
,j
!!$utD gr aw pt aw p.g 4
'E N"EN! as atxtu:
- 2. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE I
1 At110h TAEh !Y, __
FRtPAAt0 ST
,,g yrg Mit
^
an ACTIDh VERIFitD B7 p!!
, 115UED BY a*C
. , ,7, PQAE ACCEPTANCE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION a
, .<, ,, ,,.D .
O weetn=t O * **5 25- "" '""
D **' * " " " 5""" *" $"
TEMACORPORATON
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE 8#
C
\
ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION I
REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 1 OF 11
=
[,
- 1. PURPOSE This Engineering Control Procedure establishes the requirements for corrective action measures and preparation of associated documentation. These corrective oction measures are provided to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified, reported and corrected. The procedures for preparing Corrective Action Reports are presented in Section 4.0.
- 2. REFERENCES 2.1 Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Port 50.
2.2 Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Port 21
- 3. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 3.1 GErERAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1.1 Conditions adverse to quality such as failure, malfunctions, deficien-cles, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconform-onces shall be promptly identified and corrected.
3.1.2 in the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of l the condition shall be determined, corrective action shall be token to preclude repetition, and the condition with its determined cause and corrective oction shall be documented and reported to oppropriate levels of monogement.
O B-81-128 TERACORPORATION l - - - . - -- _- .. .
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE s m CT:
ECP-5.15 REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 ,
PAGE 7 OF 11 .
= .
3.1.3 Follow-up reviews shall be conducted to verify proper implemento-tion of corrective actions and to close out the corrective action documentation.
3.2 REPORTABLE DEFICIENCIES 3.2.1 Written procedures shall be established for documenting and report-ing possible Reportable Deficiencies os defined in References 2.1 and 2.2.
3.2.2 All personnel within TERA who believe that a Reportable Deficiency may exist, shall promptly report the condition to appropriate man-O ogement.
3.2.3 The possible Reportable Deficiency shall be evoluoted to determine whether or not it is indeed reportable to the thclear Regulatory Commission. Technical assistance shall be obtained from the engin-eering staff and QA staff as necessary to support the evoluotion.
3.2.4 When a condition has been evoluoted as being a Reportable Defi-ciency, the Regional Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall be notified within the time frame prescribed in references 2.1 and 2.2.
3.2.5 This prompt notification to NRC shall be followed by a written, definitive report, that includes a descr:ption of the deficiency, on onolysis of the safety implications and the corrective action token.
Also included shall be sufficient information to permit analysis and l
evoluotion of the deficiency and of the corrective action taken to 4
B 81-128 TERACORPORATION
{
l ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SWECT:
ECP-5.15
' CORRECTIVE ACTION REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 3 OF 11 ((, .
preclude repetition. If sufficient information is not available for such a definitive report within the time frame prescribed in Ref-erences 2.1.md 2.2, TERA shall submit on interim report to NRC.
This report shall contain o'! available information, together with a statement as t*> when a complete report is to be issued.
3.3 SPECIFIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS WITHIN TERA 3.3.1 TERA shall establish and implement corrective action procedures ,
consistent with the requirements discussed in this section. The need for corrective oction may result from on evoluotion of system and ;
procedural deficiencies, and includes those conditions reportable to the NRC. Needs for corrective action may also arise from the I
results of oudit findings, results of TERA design reviews, reviews of surveillance activities, and reviews of material nonconformance j reports. When the need for corrective oction is identified, the i odverse condition shall be documented on a Corrective Action Report.
i i
Appropriate measures shall be taken to bring the condition to the ottention of supervisory or monogement personnel who con take i
effective action.
l 3.3.2 Identified conditions requiring corrective oction shall be documented f on o Corrective Action Report with a control number.
3.3.3 A control log shall be maintained for Corrective Action Reports.
Controi numbers sho!! be assigned, and Corrective Action Reports shall be logged, reviewed, and distributed to designated personnel in B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECD-5.15 ORRE M E M ON REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 ,
PAGE A OF 11 g_
s, occordonce with the Project Quality Assurance Plon. The monoge-ment of the organization responsible for specifying and implementing corrective action shall be included in this distribution.
3.3.4 The organization responsible for imolementation of corrective action shall be responsible for identifying the cause(s) and for specifying the oction(s) necessory to correct identified conditions requiring correc-tive oction.
3.3.5 When the specified corrective action offects design considerations, a
' technical review of the Corrective Action Report shall be mode by the organization, or its equivalent, that established the original i
s design basis. This technical review shall evoluote the existing condition and concur with the identification of the cause(s) for the adverse condition and the corrective action (s) proposed or taken to
- preclude its repetition.
3.3.6 Once o response is received on the Corrective Action Report, the proposed corrective action shall be evoluoted and the implementation sholi be verified. The following octivities are required:
- 1. A review of the report and concurrence with the specified corrective oction measures.
' 2. Verification that odequate corrective action hos been implemented, then updating the control log.
- 3. If the corrective oction is not occeptoble or if it hos l not been properly implemented, the responsible Pro-l Ject Monoger shall be notified. This notification is documented and distributed to the some organiza-tions that received the original corrective oction.
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE CT:
ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE E OF 11 (_
g_ l
- 4. Distribution of completed Corrective Action Re-port.
~
- 4. PROCEDURES 4
4.1 REPORTING A DEFICIENCY DURING AN AUDIT USING TFE CAR I. The individual detecting a deficiency during on audit will initiate correc-tive action by filling out the appropriate spaces on a Corrective Action Report (CAR) Form, Attochment A. He will state on the CAR as a minimum: (1)o description of the requirement which describes what is l required in the deficient area, (2)his observation of the deficient area which show the area to be in nonconformance, and (3) his recommendation for correcting the deficiency. The date on the CAR Form represents the i
day the CAR was written. The individual detecting the deficiency will then sign the CAR and deliver it to the appropriate Project Quality Assurance Engineer.
- 2. The Project Quality Assurance Engineer shall review the CAR to ensure its opplicobility ond if satisfied that the deficiency requires corrective cetion, he will complete the top portion of the form by assigning a CAR number from the CAR Log (Attochment B), and complete the top of the form os applicable.
- 3. At the post-oudit conference, the Project Quality Assurance Engineer will have the Project Maroger, or his designated representative, sign the CAR in the " Acknowledged By" spoce or provide o documented reason for not signing the CxR.
l B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE CT:
f ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION
, REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 6 OF ll -
= -
s,
- 4. The CAR will then be included in on Audit Report which will be generated and distributed in occordance with ECP 5.5.
- 5. Response to the CAR from the audited orgonization shall be due os reque ted by the Audit Report. Normally this shall not exceed thirty (30) days.
, 4.2 REPORTING A NON-AUDIT DEFICIENCY USING TFfi CAR I. The individual detecting a deficiency will initiate corrective action by filling out the appropriate spaces on a CAR Form, Attachment A. The individual detecting the deficiency will state on the CAR as a minimum:
(I) o description of the requirement which describes what is required in the deficient area, (2)his observation of the deficient area which shows the area to be in nonconformance, and (3) his recommendation for correcting the deficiency. The date on the CAR Form represents the day the CAR was written.
- 2. The individual detecting the deficiency shall sign the CAR and ottoch it to o cover letter oddressed to the Project Monoger responsible for the project on which the deficiency was detected. The cover letter shall state that the
" Acknowledged By" space sho!! be signed by the person receiving the CAR.
- 3. Signing the " Acknowledged By" space only indicates that the responsible Project Monoger, or his designated representative, has received the CAR.
If the responsible Project Monoger, or his designated representative, will not sign the CAR, o documented reason for not signing shall be required by corporate monogement.
O B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
4 4
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
!l ECP-5.15
SUBJECT:
CORRECTIVE ACTION REW0 DATE:7/1/81 '
PAGE 7 OF 11 , _
- f. - .
i j 4. The CAR and cover letter shall be delivered to the Project Quality l Assurance Engineer (PGAE) for his review.
l 4'
- 5. The PGAE shall review the CAR to ensure its applicability and if satisfied 1
that the deficiency requires corrective action, he or his designate will l
- complete the top portion of the form os applicable, including ossigning o CAR number from the CAR Log (Attochment B).
I
- 6. The cover letter and CAR will be filed in the project file and distributed in
! occordonce with the PGAP.
- 7. Response to the CAR from the responsible Project Manager shall be due as requested by the cover letter, normally this shall not exceed thirty (30)
', days.
1 i, 4.3 USE OF CAR LOG (ATTACHMENT B) 4.3.1 CAR NUMBER Eoch CAR will have o unique number assigned from the CAR Log. This number will be o multidigit identification number consisting of the following:
) 1. The first four digits will indicate the audit number (i.e.,
j 76-01 would be the first audit in 1976 ond 77-12 would be
- the twelf th audit in 1977). CARS that are issued and that ore not the result of on audit will use the designator of l
- double zero following the year (i.e.,76-00 or 78-00).
I
- 2. The lost two digits will indicate the CAR number (i.e.,
l 76-01-07 would indicate the seventh CAR of audit 76-01, and 76-00-15 would indicate the fifteenth CAR written in i 1976 which was not written as the result of on audit).
!O B-81-128 l
l
! TERACORPORATION l I
____ __ _ _ . , m.
I 1
ENG!NEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
O ECP-5.15 REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 ,
PAGE R OF 11 _
- s. .
- 3. Eoch Project Quality Assurance Engineer will be respons-
)
ible for entering in the CAR Log, the CAR numbers used during that audit, immediately offer the Audit Report is issued.
- 4. The CAR Log should be maintained in chronological order and CAR numbers should not be entered in the log until offer the previous numbered audits' CARS have been entered. Those CARS which have o double zero (00) prefix will be maintained on a separate sheet in the CAR Log and the PGAE will be responsible for having them entered in chronological order os they are issued.
4.3.2 DATE ISSUED This date will correspond to the date of the Audit Report inasmuch as that is the O date upon which the company bases formal notification to the responsible Project Monoger or his designated representative.
4.3.3 ISSUED TO This space on the CAR Log will be used to denote the Project Monoger and Division to which the CAR is issued. Abbreviations are occeptable so long as they are recognized stanc;ord obbreviations.
4.3.4 RESPONSE DUE BY i
This space will include on estimate of the date by which a response from the oudited project is due.
1
(
i l B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SWECT:
(' ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 9 OF 11
=
(( _
w 1
4.3.5 RESPONSE RECEIVED This will be the date upon which the response from the audited project was received.
4.3.6 PROPOSED ACTION DUE BY Based upon the response received, o scheduled completion date for proposed corrective action will be established and this date will be entered in the space provided.
4.4 CLOSING OUT A CAR I. EVALUATING CAR RESPONSE ,
l Once o response is received, the proposed corrective action will be carefully considered by the person designated in 4.1.1 or 4.2.1 above or their supervisor.
The response will be evoluoted for insuring that the proposed corrective action I will be initiated in a timely rnanner, verifying odequacy of the proposed ,
corrective action, and insuring that the proposed corrective action precludes ,
recurrence of conditions adverse to quality. I 4
- 2. RESPONSE ACCEPTABLE If the person evoluoting the CAR response is satisfied, he will signify by signing and dating the CAR in the " TERA QA Concurrence with Proposed Action" space
- provided, if the corrective action is scheduled for a later date, that date will be entered in the CAR Log per 4.3.6 above.
O O
! B-81-128 I
l l
TERACORPORATION l , . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
i ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE ECT:
!O ECP-5.15 REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 ,
N PAGE 10 of 11
=
).
- 3. RESPONSE NOT ACCEPTABLE if the response is not acceptable, o responsible person, designated in 4.1.1 or
! 4.2.'l above or their supervisor will draft a letter to the responsible Project Monoger, or his designated representative, stating why their response v os inode-quote and what would be acceptable os corrective oction. This letter will be issued by the PGAE ond referenced in the remarks section of the CAR Log.
Communications will continue in this manner, with the responsible Project Monoger, to the level of monogement deemed oppropriate by the PGAE until resolution is reached.
- 4. CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETED If the CAR indicates that the corrective oction has been occepted per parograph i 4.4.2, the person designated in paragraph 4.1.1 or 4.2.1 or their supervisor will determine what follow-up oction is necessary to verify that the corrective action has been completed. When he is satisfied that the corrective oction is occomplished he will sign and date the " Closed By" space provided for close out opproval on the CAR Form and forward the CAR to the PQAE for review.
- 5. FILING i
Once the PGAE has reviewed a CAR, he or his designee shall be responsible for
! completing the entry in the CAR Log and ensuring that a copy of the completed I CAR is filed in the project files.
rh j
B-S I-128 TERACORPORATION f
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE MECT:
ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 sr R gE F PAGE 11 OF 11 .
4.5 REVIEW OF CAR LOG It is the responsibility of each PGAE ond the Quotity Assurance Monoger (QAM) as oppropriate to ensure through periodic reviews of the CAR Log that timely follow-up action is being taken on the CAR for which they are responsible. The QAM will review the CAR Log at least quarterly and he will make notes of any CAR which is post due, due, or will be due within a short period of time and he will bring these to the attention of the responsible porties for action.
4.6 OVERDUE RESPONSES AND ACTIONS When it becomes apparent that a Response or Corrective Action has exceeded its due date os listed on the CAR Log the Project Monoger, or his designated O4 representative, responsible for the delay will be cited as being in violation of the Corrective Action System os described by this procedure and a CAR or other The oppropriate correspondence should be issued as o result of that violation.
Project Quality Assurance Engineer or the Quality Assurance Monoger, as oppropriate, initiates this oction os a means of prompting oction from the ,
delinquent Projec? Monoger, or his designted representative.
I I
b B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
Attachment A ECP-5.15 not PROKCT P4JMBER:
'"O*CT TE' r'~x, CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT crum.
(V DATE:
CAR NO.
FROM' 1:n 2
TITLE:
ORGAPEZAT3084 DESCRPTION OF REQUIREMENT 5:
t 25ERVATlON:
,in
>4 ACKNOWLEDCED BYs REPORTED BYr MECOMMENOED ACTIOr*
PROPOEDCORRECTIVE ACTION:
i PROPOSED BY: DATE:
i
$CPELULED COMPLETlON DATE:
TERA CONCURRENCE WITH PROPOSED ACTION TITLE DAR NAME FOLLOWUP:
o s L i
tj
\
- CLOED BY DATE I
REMWED' DATE I
t CORRECTIVE ACTiONREroRT TERACORPORATION
ECP-5.15 Attachment A ce.
PROKCT NUMBE%
PROKCT MLE:
cuENT,
. (] CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT .
'. s t
DATE:
FROM, CAR NO.
10:
[
l ORCAMEATIOP4 l TITLE:
i DESCRPTION OF ME0VIREMENT5:
OBERVATION:
i --s_ ,
,4.
)
?v' ACKNOWLEDCED BY:
REPORTED BY RECOMMENDED ACTeore e
PROPOED CORRECTIVE ACTIOp*
PROPOSED 8Y: DATE:
SCPEDULED COMPLETION DATE:
TE*4A CONCURRENCE wlTH PROPOED ACTION TITLE DATE FOLLO M t'
(J CLORD BY: DATE REVIEWEDs DATE c0RRECTivE ACTIONREPORT TERACORPORATION
ECP-5.15 Attachment B (0
1 I
I, in EE l
Og i l' 8
11 I
c1 1
g Il 11
s -a_. s-__ _ - w -- - _ , - - -- - - - ~ ----
a_ _ _ e ,,
t
)
APPEtolX B l
PROECT INSTRUCTIONS O
'I O
TERA CORPORATION
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
't
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation Ph3201.. A Preparation and Control REY.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 1 ,
'of 4 PREPARED BY:
m
/ W APPRO(VO BY:w w $J PAGE 1 .
. . , , i I
l.0 GENERAL 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this instruction is to establish the requirements for preparation and control of engineering evoluotions required for the Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification (lDCV)
Program.
1.2 Scope
- Engineering evoluotions for the Midland IDCV shall be required for tasks such as design criterio evoluotion, commitment compliance evoluotion, design evolvation, construction records evoluotion, find-ings determination, safety significance evoluotions, and field verifi-cotion. These evoluotions shall pertain to all engineering disciplines of review.
2.0 PREPARATION 1
- 2.1 Eoch evoluotion shall be prepared by performing and documenting a point-by-point comparison of the' topic being evoluoted using design and construction evoluotion checklists prepared by the Lead Techni-col Reviewer. These checklists shall be developed in consideration of the design criterio contained in the FSAR, the regulations, or to the guidance contained in the Standard Review Plan Regulatory Guides, Industry codes and stondords.
O, t
PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pp 3201. 90L.
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 ,) 3 PAGE 2 of 4 PREPARED BY: APPRO g,
~ , -
2.2 Engineering evaluations shall include references to sources of infor-motion or dato used in the evaluation. References shall be listed and identified sufficiently to allow easy recovery. Title, author, copy-right date, edition, etc. shall be included as necessory identification information.
r 2.3. Evaluations shall be complete and orderly and shall include sufficient j
i b sketches, notes, and explanatory information to allow ony person not famillor with the work, but technically qualified, to understond it without extensive additional inquiry and researca.
ip 2.4 All final evaluations shall have on engineering evoluotion cover sheet
' (Attachment A) prepored as completely as possible and attached as Sheet I of each final engineering evoluotion prior to verification and opproval.
3.0 VERIFICATION AND APPROVAL 3.1 Engineering evaluatio.u shall be designated as preliminary until verified by reviewing and signed by the Lead Technical Reviewers,
} Project Manager or his designated representative, or until it is determined that such review and'opproval is not required. Prelimi-f nory evoluotions not upgraded to final status shall be maintained in a separate file for reference purposes by the Lead Technical Review-ers, the Project Monoger or his designated representative. Each final enginecting evoluotion shall be reviewed by on individual who has O
\. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l l
_I PROJECT INSTRUCTION
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation PI 3201 . 001 Preparation and Control DATE: 1/17/83 ,) ,
l REV.: 1 APPR Y.
PREPARED BY:
of 4_
l PAGE3 ;- p' qualificottons at least sufficient to originate the evoluotion. The reviewer shall not be the originator but may be the Project Manager.
l Af ter reviewing, the reviewer shall sign and date the engineering l
evoluotion cover sheet. Any comments shall be resolved with the originator prior to signoff. The Project Manager or his designated representative shall then sign only the cover sheet when the evaluo-tion and its review have been completed.
- 4. DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.1 Identificotton Af ter oil approvols have been obtained, the final engineering evoluo-tion shall be assigned a control identification number by the Project Monoger or his designoted representative in the following format:
3201-001-XXX f
JL JL JL Sequence Number Subject File Identifier
- Project identifier
- Subject file identifiers are established in the PGAP.
PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl 3201.._0pL.
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control l REY.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 ,
i s
4 PREPARED BY: J/ W ' APPRg'.ED BY:u )./p s FAGE 4 of e w f 4.2 Retention The final engineering evoluotion shall be indexed using the engineer-ing evoluotion register (Attachment B) and filed in the oppropriate project engineering evoluotion binder for each plant. Distribution shall not be made unless specific written in uuctions are issued to the contrary. All final engineering evoluotions shall be maintained by the Project Manager, or his designated representative.
- 5. REVISIONS 5.1 Revisions to final engineering evoluotions shall be mode, verified, and approved in the some manner as the original engineering evoluotion.
5.2 Superseded final engineering evoluotions shoil be so identified and transferred to a superseded document binder. The engineering evoluotion register shall note this action by referencing the new revision of the evoluotion. Revisions shall be entered into the engineering evoluotion register.
i l
- 6. OA AUDIT CHECKLIST 6.1 Audits of the implementation of this procedure shall be conducted by the PGAE using the oppropriate Audit Checklist PI-3201-00 LOA (Attochment C).
i 1
S
\
ATTACHMENT A, PI 3201-001 1
ENGItEERING EVALUATION COVER SHEET l l
i TITLE CONT. l.D. NO. 3201-001 l pgoxcy Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV NO. 0F SHTS.
l SUPERSEDES ENC. EVAL. NO.
REV.NO, REVISION ORIGINATOR DATE REVIEWED BY D ATE _ APPROVED BY DATE l
$UBICT I
b euReOsc SOURCES of REORMATION and REFERENCES O
(May se continued On A Seprate Sheet)
TERA CORPORATCN
s ATTACHMENT B, PI 3201-001 i
i .
! 1
- ENGINFFRING EVALUATION REGISTER l
3201 PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV
( FROJ. NO.
l PAGE 1 , of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-001 Date of Inw Rev. .
Engineering Evoluollon Sewen ubnumber V .
I -
1 I _
l I
I I .
m 9
TERA CORPORATON
1 ATTACHMENT C. PI-3201-001 l PROJECT INSTRUCTION g 3201., 001
SUBJECT:
Audit Checklist for Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 1 of ._ 3 vh O, b .
PAGE g.- g-
- 1. PURPOSE This checklist shall be used by the PGAE to verify the implementation of PI-3201-001, Engineering Evoluotion Preparation and Control, for those engi-neering evoluotions directly reioted to Ovality Assured Activities cs identaled in the PGAP. It shall not be used for any other categories of engineering evoluotions or types of octivities unless instructions to the contrary are established by the PGAP.
- 2. CHECKLIST
$ v/ 2.1 References?
i 2.2 Engineering evoluotion cover sheet and each page properly prepored and identified?
2.3 Review and opproval signotures or initials?
2.4 Controlidentification number per PGAP?
2.5 Engineering evoluotion indexed and filed in loose leaf binder or controlled file?
2.6 Revisions processed in some manner os original?
2.7 Superseded engineering evoluotions identified on index sheet and filed in separate binder? ___
O l q
ATTACHMENT C, PI-3201-001 l
\
PROJECT INSTRUCTION l i
4 3201., 001 SUBJECT. Audit Checklist for Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control l REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 i ,
FAGE 2 'of _ 3 Ihh J bl-
~ o
- 3. COMMENTS 3.1 Identify engineering evoluotion(s) used in preporing this checklist,
] state specific cause of any unsatisfactory rotings, and recommend corrective action, if any.
)
0 4
i!
t l
3.2 Prepared by: Date: .
L I
O O
\
ATTACHMENT C, PI-3201-001 PROJECT INSTRUCTION l pg. 3201., 001 SUEJECT. Audit Checklist for Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 ,
pac,E 3 og 3 PREPARED BY- / p APPRO g :
l N w/ 0
- 4. FOLLOWUP 4.1 Rer ommended corrective oction of item 3.1 f satisfactorily implemented?
l 4.2 If rot, state other action taken to resolve the deficiency, j
or state rationale justifying no corrective action taken, i and whether this item is closed or open.
iO i
4.3 Prepared by: Date:
0
\
PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg_ 3201. 002
SUBJECT:
Document Control Cover Sheet REV.: 0 DATE:11/11/82 ,j 4 PAGE 1 W 4 PREPARED BY:
c.
>w
/I#s APPR
(/
f D BY:
fa . E ;
l.0 GENERAL 1.1 Purp,g The purpose of this project instruction is to establish the require-ments for control of final reports and otb-r documents that are
[ developed by TERA in performance of the Midiond Independent l Design and Construc r!on Verification (IDCV) Program.
,' l.2 Scope
-l Documents such as drawings, quality assurance audit reports, Open, Confirmed, and Resolved (OCR) Item reports, finding reports, finding resolution reports, draf t, and final reports, shall be controlled by this Project instruction.
2.0 PREPARATION 2.1 All drawings, quality assurance audit reports, OCR reports, finding
, reports, finding resolution reports, draft and final reports shall include o document control cover sheet (Attochment A) prepared as completely as possible and ottoched as Sheet I of each such docu-ment prior to review and opproval.
lO t
\
PROJECT INSTRUCTION '
Pl. 3201. 002 SUBACT: Document Control Cover Sheet REW 0 DATE:11/11/82 1 PREPARED BY: / APPR :
3:g 4 y PAGE 2
- y 3.0 REVIEW AND APPROVAL 3
3.1 All documents under the scope of this Project Instruction shall be f
designated as preliminary until reviewed and approved within TERA.
Such preliminary documents shall be maintained in separate files for reference purposes only. Each document under the scope of this Project Instruction shall be reviewed by on individual who has the
]
j qualifications to originate the document. The reviewer shall not be the originator, but may be the Project Manager. Af ter reviewing, the reviewer shall sign and date the document control cover sheet. Any
]
comments shall be resolved with the originator prior to signoff. The j Project Manager or his designated representative shall then sign only
- i the cover sheet when the document and its review have been completed.
4.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL i
4.1 Identification Af ter all required opprovals have been obtained, the OCR reports, finding reports, finding resolution reports, draf t and final reports shall be assigned a control identification number by the Project Monoger or his designated representative in the following format:
'O e
\
PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg 3201.002 SilBJECT. Document Control Cover Sheet REY.: 1 DATE: 1/17/83 , i ,
PREPARED BY: APPR Y PAGE 3 of 4 3201-XXX-X-XXX JL h A J L 1 Sequence Number y Report Type identifier Subject File Identifier
- Project identifier
- 4.1.1 The following report type identifiers shall be utilized:
O- Open item Report C- Confirmed Item Report R- Resolved item Report A E- Finding Report Z- Finding Resolution Report D- Draf t Final Report F- Final Report 4.1.2 Related OCR and finding reports or draf t final and final reports shall be assigned the some sequence number, starting from 000 to 999. Note that all sequence numbers may not be used for all i report types.
i
- Project and subject file identifiers are established in the PGAP.
i l
PROJECT INSTRUCTION pg. 3201. 002
SUBJECT:
Document Control Cover Sheet l
REY.: 0 DATE:11/11/82 ,
a PAGE 4 of 4 PREPARED BY.
~
/]g APPRO v
4.2 Retention The draft and final reports shall be indexed using the appropriate Document Control Register (Attachment B-l (OCR Reports), B-2 (Reports), B-3 (Drawings), B-4 (Ouolity Assurance) and B-5 (Finding Reports), and B-6 (Finding Resolution Reports), and filed in the oppropriate project controlled documents file. Distribution shall not be mode unless specific written instructions are issued to the contrary. All such final documents shall be maintained by the Project Manager or his designated representative. These documents shall be transmitted to the client as final reports in occordance with project schedules.
1 5.0 REVISIONS 5.1 Revisions to final documents shall be mode, verified, and opproved in the some manner os the original document.
1 5.2 Superseded final documents shall be so identified and transferred to o superseded document binder. The document control register shall note this action by referencing the new revision of the evoluotions.
Revisions shall be entered into the Document Control Register.
k 6.0 OA AUDIT CHECKLIST 6.1 Audits of the . implementation oi this procedure shall be conducted by
( the POAE using the appropriate Audit Checklist PI-3201-0020A h (Attachment C).
G
- )
ATTACHMENT A, PI-3201-002 DOCUMENT CONTROL COVER SFEET j.
~ ~~
CONT. l.D. NO.
TITLE Consumers Power Comoany Midland inrV NO. 0F SHTS.
PROKCT SUPERSEDES DOCUMENT NO.
DATE REVIEWED BY DATE APPROVED BY DATE REV.NO, REvistON ORIGINATOR l
l i
SUBECT O -
SOURCES of IPEORMATION and REFERENCES
! 4 O i l
OAay Be Cantirued On A Separate Sheet)
I
%1ERACCMCRADON
ATTACHMENT B-1, PI-3201-002 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER f'
PROJECT- Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PROJ. NO. 3201 j I ) '
PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-008 (OCR Reports) _
- I* Date of issue Ree No, Document Title 3,ga, { u$numk l
l i
1 l
N)
TERA CORPORATON
ATTACHMENT B-2 PI-3201-002
{ } DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER i I PROJ. NO. 3201 - PROJECT- Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-002 (Reports) s Date of issue Rev. No.
Document Title Sep,'sf* vbnumber i l O
g-c-
ATTACHMENT B-3, PI-3201-002 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER I '
I PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-002 fDrawingd I Rev.No.
Document Title 3,m,;D. u$numk Date of issue 9
I l
1 1 ERA CORPOfMDON j
ATTACHMENT B-4, PI-3201-002
' ^
QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT REGISTER
(
PROJ. NO. 3201 PROKCT- Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE 1 of 1 SUBECT FILE NO. - 3201-005 Document Title Date of Issue Rev.b.
Seque ubnumber I
I I ..
I I
l I
1 .
l I
h1 ERA CORPORA
ATTACHMENT B-5 PI-3201-002 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV
( [
PAGE 1 _ of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-008 {Findina Reports) 1 Date of issue Rev. No.
Document Title Sequen ubnumber i
l l
l 4- _
ATTACHMENT B-6, PI-3201-002 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT- Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-008 (Finding Resol'ution Reports) s Document Title Date of issue Rev.No.
Seque ubnumber l
M D
e 4
TEfM CORPORADON
ATTACHMENT C, PI-3201-002 l
i 40 PROJECT INSTRUCTION M 3201. 002 QA
SUBJECT:
Audit Checklist for Document Control Cover Sheet itEW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 , 1 A PhGE 1 w 3 PREPARED BY: y APPROfD BY:
g i
- 1. PURPOSE This checklist shall be used by the PGAE to verify the implementation of PI-3201-001, Engineering Evolvotion Preparation and Control, for those engi-neering evoluotions directly related to Ouality Assured Activities os identified in the PGAP. It shall not be used for any other categories of engineering evoluotions or types of octivities unless instructions to the contrary are established by the PGAP.
. 2. CHECKLIST 2.1 References?
2.2 Engineering evoluotion cover sheet and each page properly prepored and identified?
2.3 Review and approval signatures or initials?
2.4 Control identification number per PGAP?
2.S Engineering evoluotion indexed and filed in loose leaf binder or controlled file?
2.6 Revisions processed in some manner os originol?
?.7 Superseded engineering evoluotions identified on index sheet and filed in separate binder?
t lO -
l i
.l 1 ___.__ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ . _
ATTACHMENT C, PI-3201-002 PROJECT INSTRUCTION a0 M 3201.,002 QA
SUBJECT:
Audit checklist for Document Control Cover Sheet REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 3 P' AGE 2 g 3 PREPARED BY:
[g APPRO{ g
< s .) V
- 3. COMMENTS 3.1 Identify engineering evoluotion(s) used in preporing this checklist, I state specific cause of any unsatisfoctory ratings, and recommend j
corrective oction, if ony.
i O
a i
i i
i l
i 3.2 Prepared by: Date:
O 1 l
ATTACHMENT C. PI-3201-002 O Pl 3201. 002 QA PROJECT INSTRUCTION
SUBJECT:
Audit Checklist for Document Control f Cover Sheet REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 i o P GE 3 -
3 PREPARED BY: /g APPRO g
%s v
- 4. FOLLOWUP 4.1 Recommended corrective action of item 3.1 satisf actorily implemented?
4.2 If not, state other oction taken to resolve the deficiency, or state rationale justifying no corrective oction token, and whether this item is closed or open.
O 4.3 Prepared by: Date:
O
- _ r - y
PROJECT INSTRUCTION M 3201 00L SUBACT: Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed y and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports
.IandFindingResolutionReports )
REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 s APP VED BY PAGE I W 8 PREPARED 8{
' p. . y---
1.0 GENERAL l.1 Purpose The purpose of this instruction is to establish the requirements for preparation and control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports required for the Midland Independent Design and Construction Verificotton (IDCV)
Program.
I l.2 Scope The evoluotion process leading to findings, including the resolution of findings, shall be documented throughout the iDCV prograrn, cate-gorized as to the status of disposition and on auditable record maintained showing the bases for the determination and categoriza-tion. OCR ltem Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports shall be prepared and controlled in accordance with the provisions of this instruction.
l 1.3 Definitions
~
1.3.1 Potential Open item l l
A determination by on IDCV reviewer that the item is o l
potential deviation in implementation of design criterio, design or construction commitments and design or construc-O l
l 1
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O Pl 3201. 008 SUBJECT Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed Q and Resolved Item Reports Finding Reports
, hnd Finding Resolution Reports REW D DATE: 11/11/82 2 W 8 PREPARED BY:
/,-p- APPROVE,D n_ BY:gh PAGE y
.ia p-tion procedures, thus requiring additional investigation or' confirmatory analysis in orcos such as: quality assurance or design control implementation, licensing criteria or commit-ments compliance, analytical or mothematical technical approach, design analysis evoluotion, specifications review, field configuation and constructed product verification, etc.
Potential Open items that are verified by the project team (Project Manager and all Lead Technical Reviewers) become open items.
l.3.2 Open item i J The item has the potential for becoming a Confirmed item, but additional investigation or confirmatory analysis is neces-sory to make a final judgement.
l.3.3 Confirmed item The item is judged to be on apparent finding by the review team and will require action, such as additional documento-tion not utilized by the team that documents the resolution of the item or additional- analysis, design or construction changes or procedural changes that may be necessary to resolve the item. Confirmed items that are later verified become findings.
1 j
9
\ .
w
)
r i
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201.. AQa_
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports Finding Reports REY.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 png Finding Resolution Reports PAGE 3 g 8 PREPARED BYj g APPR Y:
t
~ ' ~s v I
l l
1.3.4 Resolved item l6 j -
a Sufficient additional information was available in the ongoing p review to resolve the Open or Confirmed item and to com-pletely close out any concern.
I.
- 1.3.5 Finding i A verified deviation in implementation of design criterio, i
.j design or construction commitments and design or construc-tion procedures in areas such as: quality assurance, design or l
iJ construction control, onolysis, design, engineering evoluotion, specification, design or construction implementation, field installation, etc. Findings may fall into two categories; those offecting the ability of systems, components or structures to meet their intended safety function and those without on impact to safety functions. '
l.3.6 Resolved finding Sufficient additional information was made available by CPC, the original design or construction organization to resolve the finding and completely close out any concern about the find-I Ing. Finding resolution may require additional analysis, design or construction changes or procedural changes. Full resolution requires the identification of root-cause and extent and a plan for corrective action if required. I O
1
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
_l
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed
_I Pl. 3201.._ 008 and Resolved Item Reports Finding Reports 0 DATE: 11/11/82 and l[inding Resolution Reports l REY.: APPRO 4 8 PREPARED BY: /
lPAGE W 1 M F 29 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The technical reviewers are responsible for preparing OCR ltem Reports, recommending the classification of OCR ltems and forward-Ing these to their Lead Technical Reviewer (LTR).
2.2 The Lead Technical Reviewers are responsible for the classification of OCRs and the preparation of Finding Reports and Finding Resolo-l tion Reports. The LTRs shall consider input provided to them by the technical reviewers. An LTR may perform the duties of the f technical reviewer. f 2.3 The Project Manager is responsible for periodically organizing meet-Ings or telecons of the project team (Project Manager and all LTRs) for the purpose of conducting on integrated review of the classifico-tion and significance of OCRs and findings, and the resolution of findings.
2.4 The Project Manager is responsible for forwarding OCR ltem Re-ports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports to the Prin-cipol-in-Charge and Senior Review Team (SRT); forwarding Con-firmed item Reports and Finding Reports to CPC with the carbon copies to the oppropriate design organizations; and forwarding Find-ing Reports and Finding Resolution Reports to the NRC and recog-nized intervenors. The Project Manager may perform the duties of the LTR.
)
O PROJECT INSTRUCTION 1
N PI 3201.._DDfL SUBICT: Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports j REV.: 0 DATE:11/11/82 andFinqingResolutionReports PREPARED BY: APPRO PAGE 5 g 8 w, o ,
j ~
2.5 The project team (Project Monoger and all LTRs) shnll review the
! classification of and attempt to resolve Open or Confirmed items, conduct further technical review or call for further technical review to clarify, expand or reassess open or Confirmed !tems. The project team is responsible for verification of a Confirmed item leading to
] the dectoration of a finding, resolution of a finding or the re-j classification of a finding as " resolved".
{
i 2.6 The Principal-in-Charge is responsible for concurring with the classi-
! fication of OCRs, findings, findings resolution, making a determino-tion if a review is required by the Senior Review Teorn, and directing i the Project Manager to forward Confirmed item Reports, Finding
- Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports to appropriate parties.
2.7 The Senior Review Team is responsible for reviewing forwarded OCR ltem Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports, !
l Identifying the need for clarificotton, expansion of review or re-ossessment by the LTRs and technical reviewers. The SRT shall review the safety significance of forwarded OCR Reports and Finding Reports and may recommend a course of action for resolution. The SRT shall review the Finding Resolution Reports to ossess the acceptability of any remedial actions taken by CPC and the original design or construction organization.
O O
\
Y t
"" J' "S'"" " "
i O P_- 32E _JEL
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports j REW 0 andq Finding Reso'ution Reports ;
DATE: 11/11/82 PAGE 6 of 8 PREPARED BY: APPRO g l y \
-f' l
' 3.0 PREPARATION I
s 3.1 The preparation of reports under the scope of this Project Instruction
. shall follow the report generation process shown on the diogram,
" Report Flow Chart"(Figure 1).
I
! 3.2 Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall be prepared utilizing the ottoched i forms (Attachments A, B, C) assuring that all pertinent information 1
- Is documented completely and orderly.
lO i 3.3 The OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports including any supplementary sketches, notes, and explanatory infor-motion shall be prepared in such a manner as to allow any person not familiar with the work, but technically qualified, to understand it without extensive odditional inquiry and research.
3.4 All OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall have o document control cover sheet which has been prepared in l occordance with instructions documented in PI-3201-002, Document Control Cover Sheet.
3.5 All OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall be identified and retained in accordance with instructions documented in PI-3201-002, Document Control Cover Sheet.
O 4
1 I:
1
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
!O PI -.32.01.: _.00fL SUEUECT: Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports i
REW 0 DATE: 11/11/82 andfindingResolutionReports pAGE 7 of 8 bh fhJk U
i l
? 4.0 VERIFICATION AND APPROVAL 2
P 4.1 OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall
- be designated as preliminary until verified by reviewing and signing by the Project Manager.
h
'i ;
j 4.2 The technical reviewers shall sign OCR Reports thereby verifying the occuracy of the information presented and signifying that the report j hos been prepared under his review.
4.3 The LTRs shall sign OCR ltem Reports signifying his concurrence.
i The LTRs shall sign Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports thereby verifying the occuracy of information presented and signify-Ing that the report has been prepared under his review.
4.4 The Project Manager shall verify and approve OCR Reports and f Finding Reporis and Finding Resolution Reports signifying completion of review and concurrence by 'he project team.
4.S The Principol-in-Charpa shall sign OCR Reports, Finding Reperts cnd Finding Resolution Reports signifying his review and decision whether these reports require SRT review. -
4.6 The SRT (any member) shall sign oil OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports which the SRT is requested to review, thereby signifying completion of their review and concurrence by the SRT.
O
\
1
$ I o
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-J2DL _20fL SUBACT: Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REY.: 0 DAE 11/11/82 andFyndjngResolutionReports pg 8 y 8 PREPARED BY:
/ / APPRO Y:
t
~ 0 0
o 5.0 DISTRIBUTION AND INTERCHANGE OF INFORMATION S
5.1 Confirmed item Reports shall be distributed by the Project Manager
, to CPC (with a carbon copy to the original design or construction organization) upon receiving direction from the Principo!-in-Charge.
I 5.2 Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall be distributed by the Project Manager to CPC (with a carbon copy to the original a
design or construction organization), NRC and recognized intervenors
( upon receiving direction from the Principol-in-Charge.
- 5.3 It shall be the responsibility of the Project Manager to determine when there is a need to have a meeting with the project team, CPC and the original design or construction organization to discuss find-Ings or resolution of findings. He shall then notify CPC at least one week prior to the meeting so that the NRC can be notified that such a meeting will be taking place.
l 6.0 REVISIONS I
6.1 Revisions to final documents shall be made, verified, and approved in the same manner os the original document.
6.2 Superseded final documents shall be so identified and transferred to a superseded document binder. The document control register shall note this action by referencing the new revision of the document.
Revisions shall be entered into the Document Control Register.
\
REPORT FLOW CHART
- MIDLAPO N)EPEPOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION Ov VERIFICATION PROGRAM
,. . t.
i TECPNCAL A REVIEW SY )
REVIEW TEAM i REVIEW &
RESOLVED CLA55FsCAT10N ITEM SY LTR'5, W'*NTIAL y PM
% tN ITEM v F POING REVIEW &
RESOL 6 TION 2
ITEM CLA55 gytygFICA.5.
- Ot$ POSITION j
8Y Plc
- OPENITEM I
i 1 F FURT>ER REVIEW CPC/0RICNAL BY REVIEW TEAM DEsiCN
- j. INTERVENORS ORCANIZATION-ACTION PL AN O REVIEW &
PREPARATION 4
RE50L E CLA55FICATION ITEM BY LTR% ACTION PL AN PM FOR RESOLUTICH l
l CorflRMED
. ITEM REVIEW &
RESOLVED FPOING ** CLA55FICAT10N BY LTR'5,
,, 7 PM i D!5P051 TION
' BY Plc
- FROING I
i PREPARATION
+
OF RESPONSE SY CPC/ORICHAL DESIGN & FINAL REVIEW ORGANIZATION l 7
SY Plc, SRT l
1 1
RESPONSE
i Ft4AL REPORT **
, MEY: PM . PROKCT M ANAGER LTR . LEAD TECPNtCAL REVIEWER Plc . PRINCIPAL MMARGE SRT . SEMOR REVIEW TE AM 4
POTE:
- PIC TO DETERMPE SRT REVIEW APO CONCURRENCE REGUWtED CPC . CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY 4 ** DISTRIBUTED TO CPC.E APO NTERVENORS 4
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . ,-m. , - . _ _ , . - , _ - - . _ _ _ . . ..,,__,_,,..,_,r,.,,.,,- ,-.y..-y,,y,.-.
ATTACHMENT A, PI-3201-008 MIDLAFO IlOEPEFOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COfflRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT
( TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED ~ 4, 3 ,,
RESOLVED ITEM REY.NO.
j DATES REPORTED TO: LTR SRT PROXCT TEAM /PROKCT MGR.
PRINCIPAL IN-CHARGE CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOtENT(S) INVOLVED:
1 lDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):
j
! DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:
l SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:
i I
!O 4
RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION :
l 1
i i COMMENTS BY SftT (IF REQUIRED):
l l
i REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NOJ:
SIGNATURE (S):
OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROXCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)
OP.:GINATOR FOR PROXCT TEAM IN-CHARGE l DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE l 1
l
ATTACHMENT B. PI-3201-008 i
MIDLAPO IPOEPEf0ENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION I FliOING REPORT FILE NO. 32C1-008 l( NON-SAFETY DOC NO. 3201008 -
CLASS: SAFETY
.' ' REV.NO.
t PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE i DATES REPORTED TO PROECT TEAM /PROECT MGR.
SRT CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEMS (S), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
1 I
i i, DESCRIPTION OF FirOING:
I i
I i
! SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDING:
l 5
'O RECOMMENDATION:
1 COMMENTS BY SRT OF REQUIRED):
j t
i REFERENCES (INCL. REL ATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.h i
SIGNATURE (5):
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE SRI (IF REQUIRED)
- FINDING REPORT PROKCT MANAGER
! ORIGINATOR (LTR) FOR PROKCT TEAM I
DATE DATE DATE DATE
ATTACHMENT C, PI-3201-008 .
MIDLMO ROEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCT!ON VERIFICATION r
FitolNG RESOLUTION REPORT l 1 FILE NO. 320I-008 i f l NON 5AFETY DOC NO. 3201-006- .
CLASS: SAFETY REV.NO. ]
PRINCIPAL.IN-CHARGE DATES REPORTED TO PROECT TEAM /PROECT MGR. .
SRT CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
?
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEMS (S), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVEC:
I DESCRIPTION OF FROING (OR REFERENCE DOC.NO. OF FINDING REPORT): )
i l
l l
i DESCRIPTION OF RESOLUTION:
O RESOLUTION BASED UPON FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION:
COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REOUIRED):
l l
SIGNATURE (5):
PROECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL.IN-CHARGE ~ SRT (IF REQUIRED)
FINDING RESOLUTION REPORT ORGIN.(LTR) FOR PROECT TEAM DATE DATE DATE DATE l
W
%)
n PROJECT INSTRUCTION l l' pp 3201. 010 $UDJCT: External Communications: Preparation of Contact Log Sheets REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 3 PAGE 1 of 3 Mav
/
v
_ 'b . 77 >
1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this project instruction is to establish the require-
' ments for the documentation and control of records summarizing oral communications and meetings between TERA Independent Design and l Construction Verification (IDCV) Program personnel and all other extertial parties.
l.2 Scope
!O All oral communications and meetings that include discussion with l
parties external to the IDCV review organization of any subjects material to the scope of the Midland IDCV or findings and findings resolution shall be controlled by this Project Instruction.
2.0 PREPARATION l
- \
2.1 A " Midland Independer>t Design and Construction Verification Con-toct Log Sheet" (Attachment A) shall be prepared completely; identifying participonts in the conversation or meeting, their organi-zotions, the dote of the conversation or meeting, on accurate summary of all substantive issues discussed and on identification of any octions agreed upon as a result of the conversation or meeting. i O
I
\ l
l10 _
PROJECT INSTRUCTION l 4
pp 3201. 010 SURECT: External Comunications: Preparation of Contact Log Sheets REY.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 3 PAGE 2 og 3 PREPARED BY:
wv
[ v B{ g i
I l
i 3.0 REVIEW AND APPROVAL
~!
3.1 All contact log sheets prepored under the scope of this Project
{ instruction shall be designated as final upon logging in the oppro-
- priate project subject file in occordance with the provisions of
! Section 4.0 of this procedure. No further review or oporoval is required.
I i
4.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL l
4.1 Identification i Contact log sheets shall be assigned a control identification number i in accordance with the requirements of section 4.0, Administrative
- Control, of the Project Ovality Assurance Plon.
t
, 4.2 Retention The contact log sheets shall be indexed using the Control Register 1
- (Attachment B) and filed in the oppropriate project controlled subject file. Distribution shall not be made unless specific written instruc-j tions are issued to the contrary by the project monoger. All such l contoct tog sheets shall be maintained by the project manager or his I designated representative.
i iO a
l.
U _ - _ - -
l
- g pp. 3201. 010 PROJECT INSTRUCTION
SUBJECT:
External Comunications: Preparation of, Contact Log Sheets REV.: 0 DATE: 11/11/82 l / .
FAGE 3 of 3 PREPARED BY:
w
/f
/
APPROVED BY:
CYn il 2 a iM (/
5.0 REVISIONS 5.1 Revisions of contact log sneets shall not be made by any individuals other than the originator or his designated representative.
5.2 Under no circumstances should facts, figures or any other details of the conversation or meeting be modified except to correct on error j of omission or transposition.
!o 1
l 1
O t
s O
\
ATTACHMENT A, PI-3201-010 F'LE NO 320' MIDLAPO INDEPEPOENT DESIGN AtO CONSTRUCTION DO 0l-0 0-l VERIFICATION CONTACT LOG SEET REV. NO.
r
SUMMARY
OF TELECON OR MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
ORGANIZATION (S):
PARTICIPANTS: TERA:
OUTSIDE:
SUMMARY
ACTION:
O i
ATTACHMENT B, PI-3201-010 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER
' ~~
PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT - External Comunications: Preparation of Contact Ino Rhopte PAGE of SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-Ok0
~
Document Title Date of Issue Rev.No.
Seque ubnumber C
.s O
?"^'"~""
1 0
l APPEtolX C RESUMES
'O 1O l 1
TERA CORPORAI.ON l .- - ._ __-
O JOFN W. BECK Vice President - Southern / Southwestern Operations
, Education M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Northeastern University B.S. Engineerir.g Physics, University of Tulso I
1 Summary of Experience Mr. Beck hos extensive experience in technical and corporate monogement. He has monoged projects and engineering tupport activities in the oreos of fuel management and procurement, power plant licensing, environmental systems, electrical and mechanical engineering, reoctor physics and nuclear safety onolysis. His corporate management experience was as the Chief Operating Officer of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation which owns and operates a 525 MWe nuclear generating stWon. He also served as Chairman of the EPRI Nu'elear Engineering and Operations Task Force and as a member of the Nuclear Divisional Committee of EPRI.
1980 - Present Vice President, TERA Corporation. Responsible for the Southern and Southwestern Operations of the company.
1976 - 1980 Executive Vice President, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation. Served as the Chief Operating Officer of the O company. The output of the nuclear plant is sold wholesale to its owners, ten New England electric utilities. As Chief Operating Offn 3r, was responsible for the technical and business manage-ment of the corporation.
1974 - 1976 Directcr of Engineering, Yankee Atomic Electric Company.
Responsible for the general supervision and monogement of the Plant, Reactor, and Environmental Engineering Departments os well as Research and Engineering Development and computer opplications for the company.
1973 - 1974 Reactor Engineering Monoger, Yankee Atomic Electric Com-pony. Direct responsibility for fuel monogement, transient and safety analyses for the Yonkee Rowe, Vermont Yonkee, Moine Yonkee, Seabrook and New England Electric System nuclear installations.
1967 - 1973 Engineer / Licensing Engineer, Yonkee Atomic. Reload core physics design and analysis for operating plants and nuclear design folle for new plants. Licensing engineer for Maine Yonkee.
1964 - 1967 Scientist, Belus Atomic Power Laboratory. Experimental reccior physics and analysis for the Shippingport and Light Water Bret(. : ore physics design. !
Professional Associations Americon Nuclear Society TUMCORPORATION
j i .O
- HOWARD A. LEVIN i Project Manager
}
., Education I
M.S. Structural Engineering, Mossochusetts Institute of Technology B.E. Civil Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology Summary of Experience l
i Mr. Levin hos over eight years of experience in the commerclol nuclear field with emphosts in nuclear plant design and construction, operating reactor safety, licensing,
}
i project management, and federal regulation.
1981 - Present Project Manager - TERA Corporation. Responsible for the management
! and implementation of large projects servicing clients in the nuclear j
I, services oreo. I Technical Assistant to the Director, Division of Engineering, NRC.
f 1976 - 1981 Responsible for the development of policies and programs related to the l technical review of license opplications and operating reactor safety.
i Administered technical octivities in the oreos of mechanicol, equipment qualification, structural, materials, chemical, hydrological, geotechnical, earthquake and environmental engineering. Represented the Director i
}
- ond provided testimony before the NRC, ACRS, ASLB, public hearings ond industry meetings, presenting and justifying technical onolyses and l
j evoluotions.
Prograrn Monoger, Systematic Evoluotion Prograrn-NRC. Responsible l i
for the development of program gools, scope, technical criterio and j
scheduling for the SEP structural, mechanical, and seismic safety review
) of older operating reactors. Responsibilities included the administration 1 1
and monogement of large dollor resources and multi-disciplined engi- l l neering professionals. Developed new and innovative procedures for seismic safety assessment.
Senior Engineer, NRC. Responsible for the review of Safety Analysis l Report information pertaining to complex structural, mechanical and 1 materials issues related to oil aperating power and research reactor
! facilities. Coordination of technical ossistance progroms; preparation of l licensing criterio documents, codes and standards; documentation and i presentation of safety analyses and evoluotions supporting licensmg j octions.
i.' Structural Engineer, Stone and Webster Engineering Corp. Responsible 1974 - 1976 for the onolysis and design of nuclear power plant structures, systems and components for normal and extreme loading conditions. Emphasis on dynamic analysis and computer code development to solve problems related to qualification for seismic and pipe rupture foodings. Developed O' new deste concepts for prestressed concrete containment buildings.
9/s2
_. _ __ _ _ . - -_ . _ _ . _ _ .__ TERA _ CORPORATION _ _
i l
Page 2 j ps HOWARD A. LEVIN '
{U i- 1972 - 1974 Held engineering positions with Slottery Associates and Hercules, Inc.
i Responsible for design of structural systems used in construction of
- e bridges, subways, sewage plants, and process chemical plants. In charge of field surveying team.
l Professional Affiliation j %merican Society of Civil Engineers 1
i Honors and Publications 1
M.I.T. Engineering Resident Fellowship U.S.Novol Academy Appointment Moles Heavy Construction Award Selected Technical papers and Publications:
Prestressed Concrete Containments for Nuclear Power Plants, Operating Experience with Snubbers, Fracture Toughness and Lomellear Teoring of Component Supports, Equipment Response at the El Centro Steam Plant.
O During the October IS,1979, Imperial Volley Earthquake, Seismic Review of Operating Plants, Systematic Evoluotion Program Seismic Review, Evoluotion of Existing Nuclear Power Plant Focilities for Postulated Heavy Load Drop Consequences, Seismic Design Guidelines for Existing Nuclear Power Focili-ties in Light of on Expanding Data Base of Knowledge.
1 O
i 9/82 TERA CORPORATION l -
i - _
CHARLES E. LEMON
' Monoger - Quality Assurance
<O Educotton l B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho
- Summary of Experience Mr. Lemon hos over eight years of supervisory and technical experience in nuclear and fossil fueled power plant engineering, quality assurance, licensing, environmental studies and computer systems application. At present, he performs quality assurance functions for TERA nuclear safety functions, including review of project GA plans and performonce j
tof oudits, in addition, he is responsible for the system design of the NRC Document
' Control System Project. He has assisted in the design and implementation of Automated Records Monogement Systems for three nuclear power plant projects, iricluding computer software for document indexing and micrographics systems.
1976 - Present Monoger - Quality Assurance. Implementation of TERA quality assurance program, development of GA procedures, review of project GA plans, and auditing of QA octivities. In addition, responsible for the design and implementation of user oriented records and information monogement systems for nuclear projects. Special emphasis in computer indexing systems for nuclear power plant GA/QC records and documen-totion.
1974 - 1976 Project Monoger - Power Engineering, TERA Corporation. Responsible
! for the preparation of capitol cost and capability models for fossil and nuclear fueled power plants. Performed technical and economic evoluo-tions of the impoet of thermal effluent limitations on steam electric power plants for the Nationo! Commission on Water Quality.
4 1973 - 1974 Mechanical Group Quality Engineering Coordinator, Bechtel. Respon-sible for review and opproval of vendor QA/QC manuals, and preporation and implementation of group QA/QC effort with project and corporate QA/QC program.
1970 - 1973 Engineer, Bechtel. Responsible for the design and procurement of mechonical draft cooling tower system for conversion of existing or.en cycle circulating water system to closed cycle circulating water system for on 800 MWe PWR. System design and equipment procurement for Bolonce of Plant thermal cycle systems for two unit 1100 MWe BWR.
System design and equipment procurement for gaseous rodwoste system, fuel pool cooling and cleonup systems and containment atmospheric control systems.
Registrations I Registered Professional Engineer - Nuclear Engineering, California Registered Professiono! Engineer - Mechanical Engineering, California Professional Associations American Society of Mechanical Engineers O' National Society of Professional Engineers Collfornia Society of Professional Engineers National Micrographics Assoclotion
_ mew ~ .
DONALD K. DAVIS
(/ Monoger - Nuclear Safety and Licensing Education B.S. Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University Graduate Numerical Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University Studies Summary of Experience Mr. Davis has 15 years of nuclear engineering experience. He has managed licensing programs for the NRC and has performed safety analyses for commercial power plants.
He has directed multiple discipline engineering groups evaluating the design ospects of commercial power plants including potential site hozords such as earthquakes and floods, structural and mechanical design, electrical engineering, system performance and reactor core occident onalysis. He is on expert in nuclear licensing issues from o policy and engincering viewpoint. At TERA Mr. Davis has been the Project Manager for two key projects related to the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant; the performance of Seismic Design Studies to verify the safety design basis of the plant and the development of on Earthquake Emergency Plan to address the potential effects of on earthquake on emergency planning activities.
1979 - Present Monoger - Nuclear Safety and Licensing, TERA Corporation.
1972 - 1979 Chief, Systematic Evaluation Program Branch, NRC. Responsible for the safety evoluotion of 11 older power plants in over 130 technical issues from seismic design to occident onalyses.
Chief, Operating Reactor Project Branch, NRC. Responsible for the licensing octivities ossociated with 15 power reactors.
Technical Assistant, Division of Operating Reactors, NRC. Provided technical direction to the licensing staff evoluoting operating reactors.
Technical Support Section Leader, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulo-tion. Provided technical assistance and advice on policy issues to the Director and Deputy Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Project Manager, Light Water Reactors, AEC. Responsible for the licensing of nuclear power reactors for construction and operation.
1967 - 1972 Reactor Engineer, Hittman Associates. Responsible for the design and
} safety analyses of several nuclear power plants and spent fuel shipping containers. Conducted analyses of primary and secondary system transients and loss-of-coolant occident analyses for several power reac-l tor designs.
1964 - 1967 Research Assistant, North Carolina State University. Responsible for dosimetry research associated with 10 kilowatt research reactor and O- 30,000 Curie Cobalt-60 irradiator.
D TFPA CORPORATION
DONALD K. DAVIS Page 2 Professional Affiliations and Honors 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Tau Beta Pi, Engineering Honorary Sigma Pi Sigma, Physics Honorary Phi Kappa Phi, Academic Honorary
(
- O i
i
, l lO.
- I 4
TERA CORPORATION
.O t WILLIAM J. HALL Principal Scientist
, Education Ph.D. Civil Engineering, University of Illinois M.S. Civil Engineering, University of Illinois B.S. . Civil Engineering, University of Konsos University of California, Berkeley Summary of Experience Dr.Holl has had over 39 years of experience in the fields of structural engineering, structural mechanics and dynamics, soll mechanics, earthquake engineering, plasticity, fatigue, fracture mechanics, nuclear power, and civil defense including 33 years on the faculty of the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Illinois. He is author or co-author of over 115 formal publicottons (books and professional articles) and over ISO major consulting reports, many of public record and wide distribution. He is editor for a series of texts in civil engineering and engineering mechanics for Prentice-Holl, Inc. On his own and as on associate of the late Nothon M.Newmark, he has corried major consulting engineering responsibility for projects in such areas os development of design criteria for hardened protective structures, physical vulnerability studies, vibration studies of missile test stands, reactor containment structural design and analysis, nuclear field test studies, review of structural criteria and designs for nuclear power plants and equipment for seismic loadings, M-X system development, and the trans-Alaska pipeline design.
Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers, Fellow, officer of local section and numerous committees American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fellow Earthquake Engineering Research Institute - post Director American Concrete Institute American Society of Engineering Educators International Institute of Welding Seismological Society of Americo American Society for Testing and Materials Society for Experimental Stress Analysis International Assoclotion for Bridge and Structural Engineering Illinois Society of Professional Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Illinois Applied Technology Council National Science Foundation Advisory Committee on Earthquake Engineering O Who's Who in America Who's Who in Engineering Who's Who in the Midwest Who's Who in Metals TERA CORPORATION
Page 2 j -t WILLIAM J. HALL i
s Personalities of the West and Midwest American Men of Science l Engineers of Distinction l A. Epstein Memorial Aword l Walter L.Huber ASCE Research Award Adams Memorial Award of the AWS Holliburton Engineering Education Leadership Award of the University of Illinois College 4
of Engineering 4 National Academy of Engineering U.S. Delegation on Earthquake Engineering and Hozords Reduction to People's Republic of China, National Academy of Sciences Tou Beta Pi I Sigma Tou l Phi Koppo Phi
. Sigma XI Chi Epsilon i
}
1 1 I i
l j
l
! 1 1
- O k
I
-m
4
'O .
f ROBERT L. WILSON Senior Vice President l
Education
- M.S. Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University B.S. Aeronautical Engineering, Purdue University i
! Summary of Experience i
Mr. Wilson has extensive experience in monogement of engineering, environmental and i
licensing activities for power plants, mining projects and chemical industry projects. He l hos managed numerous projects involving the design of various power plant systems and studies of environmental Impacts as a result of plant or mine operations. He has directed i
numerous monogement consulting projects for TERA ranging from development of Project Control Systems to Corporate Organizational Planning and Development projects.
i 1
1979 - Present Senior Vice President, TERA Corporation. Responsible for three divi-i sions of the firm providing environmental engineering, seismic onotysis l and manoa* ment consulting services.
1 q
i 1974 - 1979 Vice President and Division Monoger, TERA Corporation. Responsible for monoging multi-disciplined projects including lignite mining studies, ,
environmental ossessments, project monogement services, waste hand-emergency /
ling evaluation, nuclear radiological ossessments, l contingency planning, facilities licensing services, and computer l
j applications projects.
1969 - 1974 Socramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Supervisor of Nuclear l Engineering. Full responsibility for nuclear engineering, environmental l
i ossessment, and federol, state, and local licensing activities for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Project. Responsibility for administration of the
$ NSSS contract for Rancho Seco Unit.
1966 - 1969 Plant Engineer, Knolls Atomic Power Lcboratory 0<APL). Responsible i for management of operation and testing octivities for o nuclear power plant facility.
f
' l l Professional Affiliations i
Professional Engineer, Nuclear Engineering, Stote of Californio l Member, American Nuclear Society; member of Executive Committee of Reactor j
i Operations Division Member, Northern California Section, American Nuclear Society; post Chairman and l
l member of the Executive Committee i
Co-founder and Chairman of the Utilities Nuclear Cootings Work Committee, a notional organization with membership from all segments of the nuclear Industry, currently representing over 80 countries.
_ _,-m-
t i
CURT M.STALEY l
- P Incipal Engineer - Project Engineering
.i Education
' M.S. Structural Engineering, University of California, Berkeley .
B.S. Structural Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Summary of Experience Mr. Staley specializes in the development and application of management methods and systems to large engineering and construction projects. His responsibilities have i l
supervision and monogement of engineering design, field cons i power plant projects in the United States and abroad.
Corporation.
l 1977 - Present Principal Engineer - Project Engineering, TERA Responsible for directing monogement services, including the design and l implementation of monogement systems for large industriol projects.
i 1976 - 1977 Engineering Supervisor and Deputy Project Engineer, Bechtel Power Corporation. Responsible for all phases of the civil design for the water treatment and porticulate control oddition to a cool-fired power plant. -
As Deputy Project Engineer, he monoged the project team and was responsible for coordinating client, vendor, and construction manage-i O 1974 - 1976 ment activities.
Project Civil Engineer, Chemico (Africo), Inc. Responsible for all field engineering activities, including document control, engineer / constructor coordination, quality control, contract administration, and client inter-face for one of the world's largest LNG plants.
1968 - 1974 Senior Engineer and Group Leoder, Bechtel Power Corporation. Leoder i ,
In the analysis and design evolution for the Mark 11 containment, reactor l building and associated facilities for a 2200-MW nuclear power plant j project. Other assignments included desip and analysis of refining and petrochemical plant components and systems ,
l .
1967 - 1968 Dynamics Engineer, General Dynamics Corporation. Developed mothe-motical models, conducted onolyses, and directed laboratory testing related to the structural dynamics of airframes.
Reaistrations Registered Professional Engineer - California, Maryland and Texas i
AssociatJons American Society of Civil Engineers Tau Beta Pi, National Engineering Honor Society Awards Awarded a National Defense Education Act Fellowship in Civil Engineering i
}
4 TERA CORPORATION
4
'O '
FRAtt A.DOUGFERTY
- Project Manager
- i
' Educotton ,
thlversity of Chicago l i M.B.A. )
j M.S. Sclear Engineering, Georgio institute of Technology
! B.S.- Chemistry, Illinois Ir.stitute of Technology
- Summary of Experience l
Mr. Dougherty has more than 14 years of experience in the nuclear power industry. He t
has managed numerous projects for villity and orchitect-engineer clients including licensing, quality assurance, design review, and design enginee. ring tasks. The plants for l l
4 which these services were provided include both BWRs and PWRs renging from the pre-l PSAR stage through backfit modification for operating plants. Among his more recent l
projects have been the evoluotion of the QA program and implementing procedures for o l
utility, the performance of a design evoluotion for on architect-engineer, and the ,
l j monogement of a project involving bockfit modifications during on outoge.
l 1982 - Present Project Monoger, TERA Corporation.
i i 1973 - 1982 Monoger, Project Monogement Division, EDS teclear. Responsible for oil major projects in the western region including engir.eering design and l; analysis, GA, licensing, and design reviews. Directed a staff of project monogers who were responsible for specific projects.
Monoger, Utility Services, EDS Itclear. Directed non-nuclear work in the oreos of project monogement, environmental services, and monoge-ment consulting. Projects included pipelines and fossil-fired power i plants.
t Monoger, Wclear Systems Division, EDS teclear. Directed plant safety l evoluotions, prepared system design criterio, monoged design review j
a projects, and developed Q A progroms.
S l Supervising Engineer, t0 clear Systems Division, EDS Nuclear. Wrote and reviewed PSARs, FSARs, and ERs, performed safety analyses, wrote l
i G A procedures, developed licensing strategies, evoluoted NSSS bids.
1968 - 1973 Mechanical Engineer, Sorgent & Lundy. Responsible for A-E interface with NSSS vendor, developed system designs, wrote PSARs, wrote specifications, evoluoted bids. , j 1
l
- Nuclear Anotyst, Sorgent & Lundy. Performed safety evoluotions and dose calculations, performed numerous economics studies, analyzed fuel l' i
supply options, developed computer programs for economic onolysis.
i l0 j 10/82(l) i TERACORPORA1)ON
i
,O 2-' FRAtE A.DOUGERTY Page Two i
Professional Affiliations and Honors
~
l American Monogement Association i American Nuclear Society ANS 3 Committee (Operations)
ANS SP Subcommittee (Diesel-generators)
American Chemical Society, Midwestern Sect *m,
- , Undergraduate Research Award i
j Professional Licenses
]
Professional Engineer, California, NU-0021 l
i I
i -
4 i
iO 1
l d
1 i
i i
1 1
I i
i
!O i
i 10/82(1) l l ERACORPORATION j
r 6
4
~
i RICHARD P. SNAIDER Senior Systems Engineer J
Education i
Systems Engineering, U.S. Naval Academy
- B.S. Whorton School, University of Pennsylvania j M a.A. ,
- Summary Of Experience Mr.Snaider hos fifteen years of experience in nuclear power, nine years of which have
[ been in the commercial nuclear field with emphasis on operation, maintenance, and l
' design, particularly as apolied to operating reactor safety and licensing.
{
l 1982- Present Senior Syst. ems Engineer - TERA Corporation. Hos participated in j several projects related to key technical issues, such as fire protection, j
the control of heavy loads, and commitment trocking. Particular emphasis has been in the area of nuclear plant system design and operation.
1975 - 1981 Senior Project Manager, Operating Reactors, Division of Licensing, NRC. Responsible for monoging and performing review of licensing 4
i Issues for operating nuclear power plants. Assisted in developing i
Commission policy regarding reloxotion of licensing requirements on f
older and smaller power reactors.
Task Monoger, Unresolved Safety issues Program, NRC. Assigned i
responsibility for developing and monoging progroms for resolution of l
two safety issues, related to BWR Nozzle Crocking and Frocture Toughness of Component Supports in PWRs.
l Senior Mechanical Systems Engineer, Systematic Evoluotion Program,
- NRC. Responsible for safe shutdown reviews on the three Mk.I BWRs included try the program. Also assisted in reviews regarding the qualification of equipment to withstand post-occident harsh environ-ments, os well as materials and mechanical topics.
j 1973 - 1975 Project Engineer, Generation Engineering Department - Jersey Centrol Power & Light Company. Served as JCP&L coordinator, with General Public Utilities Service Corporation and Burns and Roe, Inc., on large facility modification involving design ond construction of new liquid, l
solid, and gaseous rodwoste treatment facilities for the Oyster Creek l
Nuclear Generating Plant. . Responsible for selection, purchase, and Installation of a system to treat chromoted wastewater from the Oyster l
i Creek forus. Served as on ossistant to the Oyster Creek Maintenance 1 Engineer during refueling outoges, supervising seven crews of personnel l in the occomplishment of assigned tasks on plant safety systems, auxiliary systems, and turbine systems.
1966 - 1973 Officer, U.S. Navy Served aboord three submarines in positions of l Increasing responsibility, including two deportment head tours. Awarded l Navy Commendation Medal and Navy Achievement Medal, ornong others.
i Professional Affiliation 1
! American Nuclear Society 10/20/82 I TERA CORPORATION l
i( LIObEL D. BATES, P.E.
Principal Associate Engineer EDUCATION - ,
Graduate Westinghouse Nuclear Plant Engineering School !
M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Bringham Young University B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Bringham Young University l
l Y
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE s Mr. Bates has extensive experience in the design, manufacture - and test of f
- instrumentation and control systems for nuclear power plants. ,
j-1981 - Present Principal Engineer. Provides expertise in reviews involving nuclear !
. plant electrical, instrumentation and control systems.
1977-1981 System Design Group Monoger - NUTECH. Directed the activities !
of electrical, instrumentation and control engineers in the design of i safety-related systems for nuclear power plants. These systems j
! Included safety relief volve monitoring, containment temperature r monitoring, post-occident sompting, emergency power systems, :
hydrogen recombiner control and other similar plant electrical, Instrumentation and control (l&C) systems. Mr. Bates otso directed ,
l i ,
activities in the oreo of equippment qualification including the j development of "Q" lists, evoluotion of qualificotton status and the i
development of qualification programs for Class IE equipment. l As a Senior Engineer at Nutech, Mr. Bates has lead technical responsibility for modifications to I&C systems for Susquehanno 1, ;
Loguno Verde, Fermi 2 and LoSolle 1. These modifications were i made to the NSSS systems and included testability, safety relief i volve control and over thirty (30) others of varying scope and complexity.
1973-1977 Westinglx>use Electric Corporation, Idaho Nationo! Enginecring Lab l l
While employed by Westinghouse Electric et the Novol Reactor Focility (NRF), Mr. Bates qualified as Engineering Officer of the :
Watch (EOOW) of the AlW Prototype. He also qualified and j functioned as Nuclear Plant Engineer (NPE), and Emergency .
Director. His responsibilities at NRF were at the management level for the operr. tion and maintenance of the reactor plant, and for the training of nuclear navy personnel. While at NRF, Mr. Bates porticipated in numerous plant start-ups, shutdowns, abnormal events / transients, and site emergencies (octual and trotning drills).
l 1972-1973 Associate Engineer - Son Diego Gas & Electric Company.
Responsible for the forecasting of gas supply and demand, and for l
the economic justification of projects involving gas transmission and storoge.
l i
TERA CORPORATION l - __
. q i
P ROBERT L. CUDLIN lt Principal Nuclear Systems Engineer Education J.D. Georgetown University Law Center
- M.S. Nuclear Engineering, The Catholic University l
! B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University
- , Summary of Experience 4
Mr. Cudlin has over nine years of experience in the nuclear energy field. He had direct
. Involvement at the Congressional level with the policy oversight and budget authorization for the NRC and development of nuclear energy legislation. At the NRC he managed the i containment research program and was Chairman of the Containment Research Review Group. . He also directed multi-disciplinary mgineering groups in ossessing methods for combining dynamic responses, the analysis of hydrodynamic forces in pressure-suppresion
{
containments, the development of a reactor safeguards program, and the enviranmental j qualificotton of safety related equipment. Most recently he was part of the NRC's TMI i recovery team and a member of the Lessons Learned Task Force.
t i 1980 - Present Principal Nuclear Systems Engineer, Systems Engineering Operations, j TERA Corporation.
j 1979 - 1980 Principal Technical Stoff Member, Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation, i
U.S. Senate. Provided technical analysis and advice on nuclear energy j policy issues and legislation to the members of the Subcommittee.
l 1972 - 1979 Program Monoger, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, NRC.
l Responsible for managing NRC's containment safety research program.
l This included major experimental studies end analytical model develop-ment for pressure-suppression containment dynamic loads. Also respon-sible fer interfacing with International containment research programs such as Marviken I and 2, Battelle C and D, GKSS and JAERI.
i Technical Assistant, Division of Operating Reactors, NRC. Assisted in l the direction of the technical staff for the evoluotion of operating j
. . reoctors.
l Technical Assistant, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC. l Provided technical assistance and advice on policy issues to the Director ;
J i of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Systems Analyst, Containment Systems Bronch, NRC. Responsible for '
l technical licensing reviews of nuclear power plant containments. Was l
- lead reviewer on BWR Mark I,11 and til type containments including ossessment of suppression pool dynamic foods. Also lead staff person for j
- development and promulgation of 10 CFR 50.44, Stondords for Combus-j tible Gas Control Systems in Light Water Cooled Power Reactors.
i l Honors Too Beta Pi Engineering Honorary i
l Publicofions r
"Recent Considerations of Pool Dynamic Loads in Pressure-Suppression Conto nts,"
j ,
presented of IAEA Conference in Cologne, West Germany, December 1976.
! TERA CORPORATION
- __ ,- .___.-_ __.__._______._ ___ ____ _ ___,w
! FENRY J. GEORGE i Senior Mechanical Engineer 2
l . Educotton Graduate Study Nuclear Engineering, Catholic University
{ Administrative Science, University of Alabomo
! M.A.S. Mechonical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University B.S.
f
} iummary of Experience Mr. George has eight years experience in the licensing and evoluotion of nuclear powe i
plants and three years experience in general mechonical engineering on defens At TERA he hos monoged and performed technical work on various engine--ing onalys I
which established odequate measures for the control of hea served as group leader for o review team that evoluoted the odequacy of protection fr l
j fires at a large number of operating facilities, and evoluoted the adequacy of available systems and equipment to achieve safe shutdown under various conditions. His de L
related work involved experience in reliability engineering, system test plans, sampilng plans, failure anotysis, and component qualification testing. He hos extensive tra l
nuclear plant systems and reliobility engineering.
l Senior Mechanical Engineer - TERA Corporation 1981 - Present f
1 Senior Engineering Systems Analyst, NRC. Served as Task Monoger j 1979 - 1981 on a moJor unresolved generic issue monoging the ef forts of a multi-j disciplined engineering group to analyze the radiological and system 1
operational consequences of various postulated events.
f 1974 - 1979 Engineering Systems Anolyst, NRC. Served as group leader of a l multidisciplinary review team in evoluoting the effects of fires at j nuclear power facilities. These reviews included detalled site visits, i
reviews of facility drawings, and analysis of plant system responses
! to the effects of fires. Performed quality assurance tasks, including l review of utility and vendor quality assurance progroms, equipment j
ond system test programs, procedures to implement the test pro-
{ gram, and technical specification surveillonce requirements.
l
! Mechanical Engineer, U.S. Army Missile Cmnmond. Responsible for 1971 - 1974
! providing engineering support during the development and produc-In this copocity, he tion phases of vorious missile systems.
! developed reliability models, established programs for system
[
occeptance and qualification testing and rellobility assessment, and evoluoted test and operational failures.
I I
! 9/82 TERA CORPORATION
i JOSEPH A.MARTORE Senior Engineering Mechanics Erdneer EDUCATION Civil Engineering, Mossochusetts Institute of Technology M.S.
B.S.
Civil Engineering, Massachusetts institute of Technology M.B.A. Condidate George Washington University
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE '
Mr. Mortore has over eight years of engineering experience, with on emphasis cn nuclear power ploni design, construction, and licensing. At the NRC he monoged the safety environmental reviews for operating license opplications, and performed technical reviews 1 and evoluotions of operating reactor safety issues. He has also had leod responsibility for i the structural, mechanicol, seismic, and occident cr>olysis and design of nuclear plant facilit!es.
Senior Engineering Mechanics Engineer - TERA Corporation l 1981 - Present l 1979 - 1981 Technical Assistant to the Director, Division of Licensing, NRC.
Coordinated and reviewed the technical and project management efforts reioted to the licensing and safe operation of nuclear plants. Provided presentations of a variety of technical and safety matters for Congres-O sional, Commission, ASLB, ACRS, and industry meetings.
Licensing Project Monoger, NRC. Monoged and porticipated in the safety and environmental review and evoluotion of opplications for operating licenses.
Structural Engineer, NRC. Responsible for the review, analysis, and evoluotion of structural, mechanical, and seismic safety issues for operating nuclear facilities. Evoluoted and recommended design cri-terio, octed as the principal NRC witness on these issues at public hearings and before ACRS, participated in the NRC sponsored research
~ octivities, and monoged technical assistance programs.
Structural Engineer, Stone and Webster Corporation. Responsible for the 1976 - 1979 onolysis and design of nuclear power plant structures, systems and components. Emphasis on soil-structure Interaction and seismic engi-neering.
1973 - 1976 Field Engineer, North East Post-tensioning Consultants, Inc. Responsible for structural design and construction monogement of bridges and office buildings.
AWARDS AND PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS NRC Special Achievement Award for superior efforts ossociated with his review of the seismic and structural issues related to the General Electric Test Reactor Registered Professional Engineer, Rhode Island American Society of Civil Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
- mmAm~
L . - - - - ._ - . _ - _ _
O \
t ROBERT C. SNYDER {
Project Engineer
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr.Snyder is highly qualified in the field of facilities design und construction. He has worked extensively in the design and analysis of waste treatment systems for nuclear power plants and industrial manufacturing plants in addition, he has had overoll project .
monogement experience from formulation of concept through construction, start-up and operation. Control of A&E efforts, construction operations; budgets; subcontracts; -
purchasing; and equipment design are elements of his expertise. His experience has included mechanical and electrical design of facilities, equipment and processes for rodwoste and heavy industrial manufacture.
Present Project Engineer, Waste Monogement Services Division TERA Corporation. I Responsibilities include evoluotion and design of rodwoste facilities, process-es, and equipment with emphasis on operations and maintainability.
1977-1980 Principle Engineer, Hittman Nuclear & Development Corporation, Columbio, Maryland. Provided design concepts and engineering anofysis for all HNDC octivities. Fields of endeavors covered; solidification systems, storage facilities solidification machinery, and casks. Porticular tasks covered:
powdered resin dewatering equipment, pumping systems, structures, mochine design mechonical and pneumatic conveyors, electrical control, filtration O equipment, Ion exchange equipment, process, system and equipment specifi-cations, shipping cask safety analysis, hydraulic and pneumatic power units and controls, instrumentation and others.
1966-1977 Project Monoger, Assistant Division Engineer, Plant and Focilities Engineer, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, Oakland, California. Projects included construction of costing, ' extrusion, fabricating facilities, water and air pollution control and complete processing plants. Consulted with foreign offiliates, and Saudi Industrial Development Fund. Performed new plant planning function. Controlled multi-million dollar projects from concept to start-up. Supervised A&E and Construction operations directly and through subordinates.
1962-1966 Vice President, Division Monoger Container Division, The Baltimore Steel Company, Baltimore, Maryland. Designed, tested and fabricated military and engine containers for companies such as General Dynamics, Kholmorgen, Nortronics, Mortin, General Electric, Westinghouse, North America Aviation, Pratt & Whitney Aircraf t, Thiokol, U.S. Novy, U.S. Army, and others.
1959-1962 Chief Engineer, Charles T.Brondt, Baltimore, Maryland. Duties involved overall supervision of Engineering Department engaged in design of fabricot-ed metal products, mochinery, military and commercial vehicle components,
- process equipment and architectoral products.
.O m-TERA CORPORATION
l l
l MICHAEL B. AYCOCK Project Monoger i
I
' EDUCATION i Groduote Studies Nuclear Engineeririg, Catholic University B.S. Aerospace Engineering, U.S. Novel Academy
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Aycock has eight years of experience in the federal regulation of commercio! nuclear power plants. -Since joining TERA Corporation, he has monoged and porticipated in o ;
number of projects with nuclear utility clients. This includes acting as the Project Manager and/or principal engineer on projects involving the evoluotion of heavy food handling operations of nuclear power plants. At the NRC he hos developed progroms for resolving important generic safety issues encompassing numerous technical disciplines and hos porticipated in directing the efforts necessary to carry out the programs. He hos also monoged the safety reviews of nuclear power. plant construction permit and operating license opplications.
1980 - Present Project Monoger - TERA Corporation 1972 - 1980 Deputy Director, Unresolved Safety issues Program, NRC. Responsible for planning and carrying out the highest priority NRR tasks oddressing generic safety issues.
4 Technical Assistant, NRC. Coordinated and reviewed the technical efforts necessary to develop proposols and recommendations to assist in the formulation of policy by Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations, with principal porticipation in the formulation of policy on generic safety issues. Acted as the principo! NRC witness on generic ,
safety issues of public hearings ossociated with licensing nuclear power 1
plants.
Licensing Project Monoger, NRC. Monoged the octivities associated 4
with the safety review and evoluotion of opplications for construction permit and operating licenses.
AWARDS Received NRC Meritorious Service Award in 1979 for outstonding performance in the development, organization, irriplementation and monogement of the NRC Generic issues Program.
Received NRC Special Achievement Award in 1976 for superior efforts associated with 2 his performance as Project Monoger for the safety review of the Indiono Point Unit 3 operating license opplication.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION -
i l
. /
American Nuclear Society
~_ -
TERA CORPORATION l 1 i __ __1
i l
- CFRISTIAN P. MORTGAT L Senior Engineering Mechanics Engineer Educotion 1
4 Ph.D. Civil Engineering, Stanford University i ineer%
^
ree Geotechnical Engineering, Stanford University M.S. Structural Engineering, Stanford University l
B.S. Civil Engineering, Tennessee Technological University l.
Summary of Experience
! Dr. Mortgot has a brood background in probabilistic earthquake engineering that ronges from structural analysis for buildings and earth doms to the development of seismic l
hozord maps. Dr. Mortgot hos developed a unique Boyesian risk analysis methodology and has studied earthquake response spectrum shapes and their ottenuotion. He has directed or porticipated in major seismic risk analysis projects for Costa Rico, Nicorogvo, Alasko, and Algerio. He has published numerous articles and reports in these creas and hos served os an independent seismic risk consultant to several companies. Developed a methodology i
based on experi opinion solicitation for computation of seismic hozord in the Eastern 2 United States. The procedure was applied in the NRC Systematic Evoluotion Program
- olmed at evoluoting the seismic design margin of nine older nuclear power plants in the Centrol and Eastern U.S. Developed a Monte Corlo opprooch to define the seismic hozord l
of a site on on event specific basis. The opprooch was used to determine the seismic input '
l in the NRC Seismic Safety Margin Research Program.
i i 1977 -Present Project Monoger, Earthquoke Engineering, TERA Corporation. Respon-sible for several major seismic 4 risk or clyses, including one directed of oil the Department of Energy (DOE) facilities.
1976 - 1977 Eorthquake Engineer,; Woodward-Clyde Consultants. Porticipated in a seismic risk analysis of the Gulfi of Alaska for offshore drilling plot-forms. ,
i j 1973 - 1977 Research Affiliate, SNodford University, J. A. Blume Earthquake Engi-l neering Center. Developed new techniques to chorocterize the frequen-I cy content of postulated earthquake motions .and developed unique opproaches to calculating seismic exposure; l s l
i Professiono! Associations 1 a.
Americon Society of Civil Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Y
s ', !
N ,
T w 4
" ,s k
4 4
\
. . x:
r Page 2 l6 CiftlSTIAN P. MORTGAT
{ Publications
- . Journo! Papers Mortgot, C. P., " Seismic Risk Analysis, o General Approach," Pon American Institute of Geography and History, Reviste Geofisico, December,1976.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shoh, H. C., "A Boyesion Model for Seismic Hazard Mapping."
Bulletin of Seismological Society of America. (in publication).
Papers Presented at Conferences Kiremidjian, A., and Mortgot, C., "A Probabilistic Approach for Seismic L .ad Determino-tion," ASCE-EM Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Methods in Civil Engineering, Stanford, California, July,1974.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shoh, H. C., "An Intensity Scale for Earthquakes," The Fif th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, istonbul, Turkey, September,1975.
Shah, H. C., Mortgot, C. P., Kiremidjian, A., and Zsutty, T., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicaraguo," The Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, i india, January,1977.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., "A Study of Stable Earthquake Porometers," The Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, January,1977.
. Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., " Stable Seismic Design Porometers," ASCE/EMD Specialty Conference at North Carolina State University, May,1977.
Mortgot, C. P., Potwardhon, A. S., and Idriss, l. M., " Influence of Seismicity Modeling on
, Seismic Exposure Evoluotion." Seventy-Third Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, April 6-8,1978.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., "A Boyesion Model for Seismic Hazard Mapping--A Case for Algerio." Sixth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, September,1978.
I Other Publications
! Shoh, H. C., Mortgot, C. P., Kiremidjian, A., and Zsutty, T. C., "A Study of Seismic Risk
- for Nicoroguo, Port I," Technical Report No. II, The John A. Blume Earthquake i Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, January, i 1975.
i
! Shoh, H. C., Zsutty, T. C., Krawinkler, H., Mortgot, C. P., Kiremidjian, A., and Dixon, J. O., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicorogun, Port II," In two volui..es, Technical Report No.12A and No.12B, the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, jy Department of Civil Enginering, Stanford University, March.1976.
i
" Mortgot, C. P., " Finite Element Analysis of Embankments on Weak Clay Foundations,"
Engineer's Thesis, Stanford University, California, June,1976.
r
~
TERA CORPORATION
~
4 i
i^ CHRISTIAN P. MORTGAT Page 3 4
i Mortgot, C. P.,"A Boyesian Approach to Seismic Hozord Mapping; Development of Stoble Porometers," Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Californio, December,1976.
i Mortgot, C. P., Zsutty, T. C., Shah, H. C., and Lubetkin, L., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Costo Rico." Technical Report No. 25, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering j Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, April,1977.
l . Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Algerlo." Technical Report i No. 28, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil
- Engineering, Stanford University, March,1978.
1 i
i 3
I h
i jo 4
I f
I I
J 4
l l
I I
i l
!O
l l
JORMA ARROS Structural Engineer
. Educotion Civil Engineering, Stanford University !
Ph.D.
l (condidate)
M.S. Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finfond l B.S. Engineering, Helsinki, University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland i Summary of Experience Mr. Arros hos experience in research and analysis in the nuclear engineering field. He has conducted analyses of both the dynamics of structures under earthquake conditions and a finite element model of groundwater seepage. He hos also onolyzed pressure vessels using structural analysis computer progroms.
1980 - presen: Structural Engineer, TERA Corporation. Responsible for seismic hazard ;
onalysis codes.
1978 - 1979 Consulting Er.]ineer, Wortsilo, Inc. Consulted on a study of mathemati-col modeling of paper web through a paper splitter.
1977 - 1978 Research Engineer, Technical Research center of Finland. Performed
< research in the Nuclear Engineering Laborotory and analyzed structures under earthquake conditions, groundwater seepoge and pressure vessels.
1974 - 1977 Teoching Assistant, Helsinki University of Technology Presentations / Publications ,
l
" Coupled Vibrations of a Structure and Fluid Excited by Pressure Shocks," presented to the Topical Meeting on Nuclear Power Safety in Brussels,1978. Also published in Nuclear '
Technology, December 1979.
O
i i
~^ KENtETH W. CAMPBELL -
Senior Earthquake Engineer
- i l
! Education j . Ph.D. Soll Mechanics Engineering, University of Californio M. S.
Soll Mechanics Engineering, University of California i B. S. Engineering, University of California Summary of Experience )
l
.Mr. Campbell has ten years experience in soll mechanics engineering. In addition to -
responsibilities that have included shallow seismic geophysical surveys, and seismic risk l and seismicity studies, he has been involved in research in the fields of Boyesion seismic risk analysis and investigated earthquake site effects. Mr. Campbell has published j
extensively in these and related areas and hos served as on independent seismic risk i,
consultant to several companies.
1978 - Present Senior Earthquake Engineer, TERA Corporation. Responsible for seismic f risk analyses and other geotechnical studies.
t i
n j 1978 Research Engineer, J. H. Wiggins Company. Responsibilities included t
the development of a Boyesion seismic risk map of California based on '
j geologic data on major foults in California and adjacent areas.
I Consulting Earthquoke Engineer. Responsible for shallow seismic geo-physical surveys, seismic risk and seismicity studies, design eorthquake l
i motions, site response onolyses, and chorocteristic site period determin-3 otions.
l Postdoctoral Scholar, University of California. Conducted research in
- 1977 - 1978 the fields of Boyesian selsrpic risk analysis, earthquake site effects, seismic rellobility of lifeline systems, and the correlation of the seismic 1
velocity of near surfoce deposits with geology, depth and soll type.
j 1973 - 1978 Ecrthquake/Geotechnical Engineer, LeRoy Crondall and Associates.
! Porticipated in the analysis and design of building foundations, and the
- performance of seismicity and seismic risk studies, seismic geophysical j surveys and their analysis, liquefaction onolyses, chorocteristic site i period studies, and seismic site response onolyses.
1972 - 1973 Research Geophysicist, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administro-tion. Responsible for research in engineering seismology and earthquake i seismicity and risk. Developed site-dependent earthquake intensity i distributions of large earthquakes.
4 h Professional Affiliations
)
) American Society of Civil Engineers i Earthquake Engineering Research Institute l
Seismological Society of America i Tau Beta Pi, National Engineering Honor Society International Society of Soils and Foundation Engineering l
TERA CORPORATION
1 Page 2 1 KENrETH W. CAMPBELL ,
Publicottons
.i I Duke, C. M., J. A. Johnson, Y. Khorror, K. W. Campbell, and N. A. Malplede, Subsurface l i . Site Conditions and Geology in the Son Fernando Earthquake Area, School of i Engineering and Applied Scier.ce, University of Californio, Los Angeles, (UCLA-l l ENG-7206),197 8.
l Campbell, K. W., An Empirical Earthquake Intensity Function in Bedrock, M.S. Thesis in i Engineering, University of Californio, Los Angeles,1972.
i . .
I Perkins D. M., S.T., Harding, K.W. Compbell, and A. F. Espinoso, Studies of Site j Amplification in Son Fernando, Proceedings of the Microzonation Conference.
University of Washington, Seattle, Vol. II, pp. 910-927,1972.
l j Campbell, K. W., Site Properties and Bedrock Intensities in the Son Fernando, Californio L Earthquoke of Febroory 9,1971, in Earthquake Research in NOAA,1971-l972, j edited by J. C. Stepp, Environmental Research Loborotories, National Oceanic and i Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, (NOAA TR ERL 256-ESL 28), p. 54,
! 1973.
i l Algermissen, S. T., D. M. Perkins, W. Rinehort, K. W. Campbell, and M. Hopper, A Study j of Earthquake Losses in the Los Angeles, Californio Area, Environmental Research Laboratories, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrotion, Boulder, Colorado (prepared for HUD),1973.
Campbell, K. W. and C. M. Duke, Bedrock Intensity Attenuction and Site Foctors from San f Fernando Earthquake Records, in Optimization of Water Resource Systems incorporating Earthquake Risk: 1973 Contributions, edited by C. M. Duke and 5. E.
Jacobsen, University of Californio Water Resources Center, Contribution No.141, f'j pp. 81-l 14,1973.
Duke, C. M., J. A. Johnson, Y. Khorroz, K. W. Campbell, and N. A. Malpiede, Subsurfoce Site Conditions in the Son Fernando Earthquake Area, in The Son Fernando, California, Earthquake of Febroory 9,1971,(EERl/NOAA), Vol. IIB,785-799,1973. l Campbell, K. W. and C. M. Duke, Bedrock Intensity Attenuation and Site Factors from Son y
- Froncisco Earthquake Records, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,64:173-l85,1974.
Campbell, K.W. and C. M. Duke, A Reply to o Discussion of Bedrock Intensity Attenuation and Site Foctors from Son Fernando Earthquake Records by P.C.
i Jennings, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 64:2009-2010, 1974.
j Campbell, K.W., A Note on the Distribution of Earthquake Domoge in Long Beach,1933,
- Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,66
- 1001-1005,1976.
Eguchi, R. T., K. W. Campbell,' C. M. Duke, A. W. Chow, and J. Paternino, Shear l Velocities and Near Surface Geologies of Accelerograph Sites That Recorded the Son Fernando Earthquake, School of En_gineering and Applied Science. University of Collfornia, Los Angeles,(UCDRNG-7653),1976.
!s 4
TERA CORPORATION
!, Page 3 KEtMTH W. CAMPBELL
- O
- Publications. Cont.
l Campbell, K.W. and C.M. Duke, Correlations Among Seismic Velocity, Depth and Geology in the Los Angeles Area, School of Engineering and Applied Science,
! University of Californio, Los Angeles,TUCLA-ENG-7662),1976.
1 ,
Duke, C. M., R. T. Eguchi, K. W. Campbell, and A. W. Chow, Effects of Site on Ground I
4 Motion in the San Fernando Earthquake, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles,(UCLA-ENG-7688),1776.
i Campbell,K.W., Design Earthquokes Based on the Statistics of Source, Path and Site i
Effects, Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, Indio, Vol. 2, 2 2 55, 1977.
Duke, C. M., R. T. Eguchi, K. W. Campbell, and A. W. Chow, Effects of Site on Ground Motion in the Son Fernando Earthquake, Proceedinos of the 6th World Conference on i Earthqucke Engineering, New Delhi, India, Vol. 2, 2 2-99,1977.
Eguchi,R.T. ond K.W. Campbell, Seismicity and Site Effects on Earthquake New Delhi, Risk, Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, l
i India, Vol. 2, 2-399 404, 1977.
i j Campbell, K. W., The Use of Seismotectonics in the Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Ris School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, j
IUCLA-ENG-7744),1977. -
! Campbell,K.W., Geotechnical Correlations of in Situ Seismic Velocity in Southern j
f California, Proc. of Two Day Symposium on Living With the Seismic Code,
- Structural Engineers Assoc. of So. Calif., Los Angeles, March 7 & 14, Sess.1-Chorocteristic Site Period, Sect. B, pp. 1-13,1978.
i Campbell, K. W., An Estimate of Recurrence Times from Seismotectonic Dato on a Fou in Geologic Guide and Engr. Geology Case Histories, Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, 1st Annual Calif. Sect. Meeting, Assoc. of Engr. Geol., May 12-14,1978, Los Angeles, pp.95-101,1978.
j l
~' Campbell, K.W., Lifeline Reliobility and Seismic Risk, (Summary), Proc. of Lifeline j
Earthquake Engineering Workshop, Eorthquoke Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Pasadeno, Calif., June 19-21,1978, Geotechnical Engineer-l Ing Div., ASCE, Vol. Ill,1978.
l Campbell,K.W., Empirico! Synthesis of Seismic Velocity Profiles from Geotechnica
- Data, Proc. Second International _ Conference on Microzonation, Nov. 26-Dec. I, i
1978, Son Francisco, Voi, II, pp. 1063-1075 1978.
I Compbell, K.W., R.T. Eguchi, and C. M. Duke, Reliability in Lifeline Earthquake i
Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Annual Convention and Exhibit.
J
' October 16-20,1978, Chicogo, Preprint 3427,1978.
i .
- 1 i
~
h TERA CORPORATION l
i ;
Pcge 4 l i KENNETH W. CAMPBELL Publications. Cont.
Campbell, K.W., A Boyesian Procedure for incorporating Seismotectonics in the I
Estimation of Seismic Risk on a Foult, Proc. ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Stresctural Reliability, January 10 ,2, 1979, Tucson,
- Arizono, pp. 290-294, I979.
I Campbell, K.W., R.T. Eguchi and C. M. Duke, The Use of Reliability in Lifeline '
Earthquoke Engineering, Proc. ASCE Speciotty Conference on Probabilistic l Mechanics and Structural Reliobility, January 10-12,1979, Tucson, Arizono, pp. 305-i ,
310,1979.
1 Presentations
" Subsurface Site Conditions and Geology in the Son Fernando Earthquake Areo," Presented l' of the San Fernando Earthquake Conference, Los Angeles, Februcry,1972 (With
,I J. A. Johnson).
I " Bedrock Intensity Attenuation and Site Factors from Son Fernando Earthquake Records,"
Presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America, l
Golden, Colorodo, May,1973.
" Distribution of Earthquake Domoge in Long Beach in 1933 as Related to Propogotion ond.
! Site Effects," Presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of 4
l America, Los Angeles, March 1975.
! "A Comparison of Linear and Psuedo Nonlinear Methods of Site Response Analysis,"
l Presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Los
! Angeles, March,1975 (M. Lew, Speaker).
" Site Effects in Earthquakes," Presented at the meeting of the Los Angeles Section of the i' American Society of Civil Engineers, Los Angeles, April,1976 (with C. M. Duke and R. T. Eguchi).
" Design Earthquakes Based on a Domoge Threshold Level," Presented of the 71st Annvol
! Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Edmonton, Alberto, Conodo, May, J
1976.
i "Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk," Presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the i Seismological Society of Americo, Socramento, California, April,1977.
i
" Correlations Among Seismic Velocity, Depth and Geology in the Los Angeles Areo,"
Presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, L Socromento, California, April,1977.
' 'The Use of Seismotectonics in the Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk," Presented at i
the J. H. Wiggins Company, Redondo Beoch, Californio, October,1977.
- O.
9 TERA CORPORATION
I Page 5
[o U
KEf4ETH W. CAMPBELL Presentations Cont. l "Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk on a Foult with Emphasis on Lifeline Systems, l Presented at the Two Day Course on Seismic Risk Analysis, EERI, Univ. of So.
' Calif., Los Angeles, February 8 and 9,1978.
"Geotechnical Correlations of in Situ Seismic Velocity in Southern Californio," Presented at the two Evening Symposium on Living with the 5eismic Code, SEAOC, So. Calif.
Section, Los Angeles, Calif., March 7 & 14, 1978, Session I, Chorocteristic Site Period.
"Geotechnical Correlations of in Situ Seismic Velocity in Southern Californio," Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Sparks, Nevado, April 6-8, 1978.
"The Use of Seismotectonics in the Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk," Presented of the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Sporks, Nevado, April 6-8,1978.
" Lifeline Reliability in Seismically Active Regions," Presented at 73rd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America, Sporks, Nevado, April 6-8, 1978, (R. T.
Egochi, speaker).
"Geotechnical Considerations of the Seismic Design Code," Presented at Portiond State University, Portiond, Oregon, May 22,1978.
" Lifeline Reliability and Seismic Risk," Presented at the Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Workshop Session, (Ponelist), Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Geotechnical Engineering Div., ASCE, Pasodeno, Calif., June 19-21, 1978.
" Empirical Synthesis of Seismic Velocity Profiles from Geotechnical Dato," Presented at the Second international Conference on Microzonation, Son Francisco, California, November 26-December I,1978.
"A Boyesion Procedure for incorporating Seismotectonics in the Estimation of Seismic Risk on a Foult," Presented at the ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechonics and Structural Reliability, Tucson, Arizona, January 10-12, 1979.
(O i
' TERA CORPORATION i . - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ - - _
4 i NORMA >O A.BERLBE Senior Engineering Systems Analyst l l
Education I M.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire B.S. Astronautical Engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy ,
Summary of Experience :
i Mr.Berube hos extensive technical experience in the design and opplicotton cf energy !
related systems analysis progroms, in addition, he has over five years experience in computer programming and data management projects related to the development of ,
analytical models to support energy technology development. !
1981 - Present Senior Engineering Systems Analyst, Wasie Monogement, Services l Division, TERA Corporation. Primary responsibilities indude analytical systems, computer l evoluotion and modification of rodwoste j programming and system analysis to support development of similation modeling techniques, and porticipation in information retrieval ,
i software development projects associated with the nuclear utility industry.
Senior Systems Analyst - JBF Scientific Corporation. Developed and f 1979 - 1981 O applied onolytical models to simulate the operational performance of solar-electric energy systems along with methods and models to evoluote their economic potential in a wide variety of applications.
l l
i Assessed the mojor technical, economic, resource, environmental, and institutional constroints to the successful commercialization of energy
' technologies. Prepared technology transfer strategies and market development plans. Principal Investigator and author of technical i reports containing recommendations to the U.S. Congress, the U.S.
Department of Energy, and the Solar Energy Research Institute.
1978 - 1979 Mechanical Engineer, Research and Development - Data General Corporation. Performed analytical and experimental research in heat l transfer, fluid dynamics, and contamination control. inventor of i l
potented equipment related to the operation of a computer disk drive. !
Designed and established a solar j 1977 - 1978 University of New Hampshire. >
rodiation data ocquisition system. Conducted bi-weekly recitations in Heat Tronsfer and Fluid Mechanics.
1978 - 1980 Consulting Systems Analyst - Marine Systems Engineering Laboratory
- (part-time). Completed all heat transfer analysis and computer model-
- Ing of an unmanned thermal Ice drill. Three-dimensional finite difference simulation verified by the U.S. Army Cold Regions Laborofory, l
1971 - 1976 Captain, United States Air Force, Standord Evoluotion Flight Examiner.
Responsible for squadron navigational training and evoluotion.
Received the U.S.A.F. Commendation Medal for outstonding service.
i TERA CORPORATION
"[ FREDERICK M.BERTFRONG Senior Mechanical Engineer 4
, s Education M.S. Nuclear Engineering, University of Washington f U.S. Naval Academy
. B.S.
i l Summary of Experience s'
Mr. Berthrong hos extensive experience in the monogement and administration of design, licensing, procurement and construction of large power plant projects. He is currently 5 Involved in the design and implementation of information and management systems in-cluding computerized systems for on-line performance of a variety of odministrative i
tasks. He has recently completed the design and implementation of a Maintenance and i Operating Data System for a large electric generating station. His responsibilities have i included day-to-day supervision and monogement of large-scale projects both in the design 1 office and at construction sites.
1977 - Present Senior Mechanical Engineer - Information Systems Division, TERA l Corporation. Performed and monoged numerous projects related to 1
Information monogement including the design and implementation of large-scole records monogement, maintenance monogement and material control systems and the development of other computer applications.
)
1975 - 1977 Leod Project Field Engineer, Bechtel. Directly responsible for all field
' engineering activities in the Reactor Building and Containment complex (2-1100 MWe Units) and interfocing with all other on-site organizations.
Coordinated directly with superintendents for planning, scheduling and i
j problem solving. Acted as lead superintendent during various project phases.
- 1972 - 1976 Engineering Supervisor, Bechtel. Mechanical Group Supervisor respon-i sible for supervising all nuclear, mechanical and HVAC systems design )
and procurement and for project licensing, j l U.S. Navy. Completed nuclear power training and served aboard a
- 1965 - 1970 1
nuclear submarine with primary responsibilities in the engineering
! deportment.
a
! Registrations i
i Registered Professional Engineer - Mechonical Engineering, California and Washington Awards Awarded an Atomic Energy Commission Special Fellowship in Nuclear Engineering by
,O the University of Washington, i
I TERA CORPORATION
. - - - . - . _ - . - . - - .. - . ..--. -- . - .- _ . - . .t
E i
. LEONARD M. STOUT i Senior Project Monoger Education
- B.S. Engineering Management, University of Missouri School of Mines. Majored in
' Mechanical Engineering and Business Monagement.
j ,
s Summary of Experience i Mr. Stout hos a brood bockground in the energy industry including cost engineering, con-struction field engineering, desir development and field implementation of computerized project control systems and monoging " gross-roots" implementations of minicomputer facilities and systems. His extensive knowledge of the work process and control aspects
. of the design, construction, startup and operations phases of fossil and nuclear projects l
4 has been incorporated into computerized scope, schedule and cost control systems developed by TERA for our clients.
1977 - Present Senior Project Monoger - Information Systems, TERA Corporation. Mr.
Stout has provided project leadership to several major projects. These
! projects include the conceptual phase studies for o utility-wide informo-tion monogement system, technical services implementation plan for o
- developing Engineering and Construction Department within a utility service company, development of material control systems that inte-grote activities of menufocturers, orchitect/ engineers, and constructors,
! the desip and management of projects in Michigan, Texas, New Jersey,
!, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Californio, Arizono, Colorodo and New York.
! 1976 - 1977 Project Control Systems Group Supervisor, Bechtel. Provided consulting services and technical direction to project scheduling and cost groups to l ensure technical quality of methods and procedures as related to l
j computerized project control systems.
In this copocity, Mr. Stout has traveled extensively throughout the U.S.
l to consult on both nuclear and fossil projects, including BWR, lignite, and l
j low sulfur cool plants.
f 1975 - 1976 Project Control Engineer, Bechtel. Implemented material, cost and scheduling control systems on two Bechtel nuclear projects in the Engineering Design phase.
1974 Staff Assistant to Field Construction Manager on a three-unit (each 500-MWe) mine mouth cool station in Wyoming. Responsibilities included .!
coordinating the activities of cost engineering, scheduling, subcontracts, l
l '
j field engineering, supervision, and stortup.
1971 - 1973 Senior Field Engineer on a two-unit,600-MWe oil-fired station in New !
l York. Successively served as o Field Cost Engineer, Assistant Field J
i l
Electrical Engineering Group Leoder, and Stoff Assistant to the Project i Superintendent, responsible for all computer and material control activi-I ties.
l
( 1968 - 1969 Design and Field Engineer for Trunkline Gas Company in Texas and I lilinois.
'O .
TERA CORPORATION
i p SUSAN SLY Project Engineer (Q
l Educotton i B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Toledo
)
Summary of Experience .
Ms. Sly coordinates the design, development, and implementation of large scale automated information retrieval and records management systems related to nuclear licensing and engineering in the utility industry. In this capacity, her experience in on-site client interface and program management has included participation in the development and opplication of systems hardware, software, and procedures tailored to meet specific user needs and satisfy a brood scope of regulatory and quality ussurance requiremerfs. As a civil engineer, she has been involved in the structural design and onolysis of nuclear power plants and has actively participated in the technical review and update of engineering records for those plants, including the development of specialized keyword indexes used to analyze and update FSARs.
1981 - Present Project Engineer, TERA Corporation. Responsible for implementing outomated information management
' systems within nuclear utilities. Developed keyword indexes used in FSAR update systems along with proced-ures for system implementation through prograrn comple-tion and acceptance. Provides interface between soft-wore development and user requirements os well as user
'O training. Porticipated in the technical review and update of FSARs and other technical documents related to the nuclear utility industry, including participation in imple-menting specialized subject indexing capabilities for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control System.
1978-1981 Civil Engineer, Bechtel Power Corporation. Involved in the design of nuclear power plants; including structural design, dynamic onalysis, computer opplications, and seis-mic survey. Worked on-site during construction of a nuclear power plant where duties included design, design verification, and inspection.
Porticipated in a project involving oil to cool conversion of a steam plant. Responsibilities included structural ,
design and interface with mechanical, electrical, and l orchitectural design groups. Wrote specifications for i purchase and placement of materials.
1977-1978 Engineering Aide, City of Toledo. Collected and compiled dato on street measurements and conditions, inspected bridges, surveyed, and scheduled street maintenance.
O i l
11/4/32 TERA CORPORATION l
l f-
- ~' RICHARD R. MacDONALD Senior Mechanical Engineer i Education t
l
- M E.A. Management, Golden Gate University i B.S. Physics, U.S. Naval Academy (with merit)
!, Summary of Experience
! Mr. MacDonald has diversified experience in oil facets of the design, procurement, construction, and licensing of large power plants, including the development of various computerized systems for efficient plant operations. He has monoged a wide range of
- engineering efforts at various stoges of project development, such as conceptual and detailed design, construction, stortup and continuing support to operating plants. He has i directed and porticipated in the design and implementation of computerized systems which control data related to power plant equipment, incintenance management, engi-4 neering and construction task monogement, spare ports and material control, plant l
reliability assessment and trocking of radiological exposure dato. His efforts have been j focused on the development of systems to support utilities in the construction, operation i
and maintenance of power plants.
1980 - Present Senior Mechonical Engineer-Information Systems, TERA Corporation.
f Responsible for the development of computerized document control and i
operating dato systems, as well as large-scale systems for project j
O monogement and project control. Monoges the development and imple-mentation of multi-opplication records and dato monogement systems for power plant environments. These systems and services are designed to yield immediate benefits to the client in terms of improved productiv-
- Ity and plant availability.
q 1 1971 - 1979 Project Engineer -Bechtel Power Corporation. Directed the molysis
! requirements, alternatives and costs for decommissioning nuclear power
! plants. Provided consulting support to m International team which developed a new reoctor/ containment design, including evoluotion of l plant arrangement, systems and structural design concepts.
~
l Assistant to the Monoger of Engineering, developed and maintained i
engineering standards and procedures and monitored research and i development progroms.
! Engineering Group Supervisor, responsible for mechanical, nuclear, in-strument and control, and HVAC systems design, procurement octivities l and project licensing efforts for two twin 1100 MWe nuclear power i
plants. Special assignment to BWR Owners' Group Task Force for the resolution of common containment design problems.
{
1967 - 1971 Officer, U.S. Navy. Assigned to the Engineering and Operations Deport-ments and of tended numerous training programs (e.g., nuclear power and engineering officer schools). Responsibilities included supervision of the operation and maintenance of c!! engineering systems of a destroyer and O coordination of all material maintenance management activities for a guided missile cruiser.
TERA CORPORATION
i l $1DffY J. BROWN
- Construction Serv!ces
! Education I i
t j Engineering Monogement, University of California, Berkeley, California Electrical Engineering, Son Francisco City College, San Francisco, Californio l l
4 l Summary of Experience Throughout his 30 years in the engineering / construction profession, Mr. Brown has gained l extensive experience in the areas of construction monogement and scheduling, labor
- As manager of a construction relations, croft supervision and personnel administration.
l computer systems group, Mr. Brown developed systems to facilitate the processing of l project dato and quality control reports related to both nuclear and nonnuclear power l projects. Developed a Most TERA site occess monitoring and security system for the recently, completed the construction, storfup, initial
- construction industry.
I operation and maintenance of the notion's first residential electric cogenerofion power j plant at a large oportment complex for Southern California Edison.
1
[ 1980 - Present .Monoger, Construction Services, TERA Corporation. Primarily respon-sible for coordinating tasks associated with the design, construc-tion, .
startup and operation of mojor power-generating facilities. Con-trols all phases of project implementation relating to construction, engineering review, cost engineering, pionning and scheduling, field construction and quality control engineering. Serves as Interface between construc-tion j controc-tors and subcontractors, suppliers, architect / engineers, and '
/ owners of property involved with projects.
i 1965 - 1980 Construction Specialist, Bechtel Power Corporation. Held various post-tions, ranging from field engineer, craft supervisor, ossistant site man-j ager and assistant project engineer to construction coordinator, responsi-g ble for project control systems design, implementation, training and auditing. Supervised the mechonical/ piping area on three-unit nuclear 4
l power project.
1964 - 1965 Area Administrator and Construction Planning Consultant, H. L. Yoh and McDconell Douglas Corporation. Directed support services for on aero-space focilities project during design and construction operations.
1961 - 1964 Assistant Project Superintendent, Field Project Engineer, and Contracts Administrator, Noble Company. Responsible for the engineering /procur-l ement odministration of support services contracts.
i i
! 1960 - 1961 Monoger of Engineering, Bloxham Engineering. Supervised the design 1 and fabrication of prcfctype equipment.
{ Lead Research and Development Engineer, Senior Loyout Specialist, and 1955 - 1960 l Assistant Production Monoger, Noble Company. Responsible for the l monu-focture of construction-related equipment.
i 1951 - 1954 U.S. Army, Army Security Agency, Electronics Installations and main-
)
i i TERA CORPORATION
1 I
DONALD'B.TULODIESKI Project Manager
( -
Education B.S. U.S.Noval Academy L
. Summary of Experience \
Mr.Tulodieski manages projects ranging in scope from project control and management systems to integrated information systems including material control,. maintenance management, cost and schedule control, records monogement, and systems interface evoluotion. He has extensive monogement experience in nuclear and fossil-fueled power plant licensing, warehousing procurement, testing oraf operations, Mr.Tulodieski has r designed and implemented data base systems which provide quantitative means of i evoluoting power plant rellobility and avoitability in addition to automated systems j designed to provide professionals access to vital technical and contractual information and dato. '
1978 - Present Project Monoger, TERA Corporation. Monoges and porticipates in the evoluotion, design, development, and implementation of projects relating to document, information and monogement control systems. Addi- }
i tionally, he hos conducted evoluotions and seminors and consulted in mojor utility corporate material control programs.
1973 - 1978 Project Monoger, Bobcock & Wilcox Company; Supervisor, Site Support '
and Testing, Babcock & Wilcox Company. Directly responsible for all ospects of interfocing and focusing technical and licensing related
- O resources to satisfy client's needs as stipulated in contractual ogree-ments while maintaining cost and schedule gools as promulgated by company guidelines and as required by the client. The above project -
management octivities were performed for two sepcrote NSSS contracts l' consisting of a total of four nuclear generating facilities.
As supervisor, site support and testing, established data base and real-time systems for site-generated test dato and implemented a reliability .
and availability trocking system for B&W systems and equipment.
Resolved operating and stort-up site problems associated with the i performance of equipment and system testing and core physics test j programs. ;
1970 - 1973 Engineer, Public Service Electric & Gas Company of New Jersey. I Qualified stationary engineer in the operation of 1,100 MW oll-fired generating station and the start-up and operation of gas turbine peaking !
i units. Responsible for the generation and implementation of start-up l
testing procedures ossociated with the pre-critical and critical testing of
' two 1,100 MW nuclear generating units. l Lieutenant, U. S. Navy Nuclear Submarine Force. Responsible for the j
- 1965 - 1970
~' maintenance and operation of nuclear and diesel powered propulsion and t ouxilio'y equipment.
i Professional Affiliation !
O- American Nuclear Society l
National Microgrophics Association 1 i !
11/08/82 TERA CORPCRATION l
_ _ . _ _ ._- . ._ .- _ _ __ _-. _ _ _ . _ _._ _ _ _ __ J
p G
t MONTE J. WISE Principal Associate Engineer EDUCATION B.S. Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbo'ck, Texas 4
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE
. Mr. Wise has had extensive and diverse experience in nuclear and systems engineering.
Throughout his career, he has worked at several levels, including superintendent, for nt:: lear po'wer plants and been responsible for vorled duties such as recruiting and
, training staff, directing engineering functions, supervising construction surveillance, and designing, constructing, modifying, and operating in-reactor and out-of-reactor i research and development testing facilities. In systems engineering he has been responsible for welding and fabrication engineering, nondestructive examination technique and equipment development, maintenance engineering, quality and reliability assurance programs, and computer systems development.
1982 - Present Principal Associate Engineer.
! 1980 - 1982 Senior Project Manager, TERA Corporation. Responsible for i providing senior level technical services to utilities. Since joining 1
TERA, Mr. Wise has participated in and managed projects involving updating Final Safety Analysis Reports, developing and implementing information management systems, nuclear plant quality assurance program assessment and improvement, generating 3
plant productivity improvement programs, inservice inspection
' program assessment and definition, and organizing and developing nuclear plant technical support programs.
1982 - 1980 Director and Assistant Director of Quality Systems Engineering Department, and Management, Operations Engineering Section, Southwest Research Institute. Functions included welding and
- fabrication engineering services, nondestructive examination (NDE) technique and equipment development, NDE services including inservice inspection, maintenance engineering services, quality and
! rellobility assurance program development and Implementation, vendor evoluotion and survelliance services, and dato processing and j information management systems development and services.
Project Manager and primary porticipant in the development, Implementation, and operation of the Nuclear Plant Reliability Dato System (NPRDS).
f 1964 - 1972 Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of the Lacrosse Nuclear Power Plant, Dairyland Power Cooperative. Responsible
- for the overall management of the plant and several support functions including plant engineering, fuel management, quality ossurance, and contract administration. Licensed Senior Reactor y Operator.
i
_ _ . . _ . . . _ . __ TERA CORPORATION . _
l l
i I lg[' MONTE J. WISE l Principal Associate Engineer Page two l
I l
, 1962 - 1964 Engineer, Coolant Systems Development Operot. ions, General Electric Company. Responsibilities included the design, construction, modification, operation and results evoluotion of in-reoctor and out-of-reactor research and development testing facilities.
1957 - 1962 Supervisor, Reactor Operations, and Reactor Operations Specialist, General Electric Company.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Wisconsin Professional Engineer Society American Society for Quality Control
-American Society for Nondestructive Testing American Nuclear Society O
O TERA CORPORATION 1
d
- MEHMET CELEBI '
i PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST
- , EDUCATION 4
i Ph.D. Civil Engineering, McGill University
- M.S. Civil Engineering, Stanford University
, B.S. Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University 1
I
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE l Dr. Celebi has had over 16 years of experience in the fields of structural l engineering, structural rnechanics and dynomics, earthquake engineering, plasticity, and nuclear power, including 8 years on the foculties of the Civil
- Engineering Departments at the Middle East. Technical University and Son i Francisco State University. He is outhor or co-outhor of over 40 formo!
j publications (books and professional articles), regarding structural and seismic l j
engineering and engineering mechonics. On his own and as on associate with i
engineering and consulting firms, he hos corried major engineering responsibility
! for projects in such areas os development of design criteria for nuclear I structures, vibration and seismic studies for structures, reactor containment structural design and analysis (including inelostic studies) and review of structural criteria and designs for nuclear power plants and equipment for ,
O seismic foodings. In addition to his engineering and design experience, Dr. Celebi held the position of Manager of Quality Assurance at o leading engineering consulting firm. He hos also had extensive invc!vement with professional and 1
- code committees related to development of earthquake engineering design j criterio.
i PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AND HONORS Registered Professional Engineer (California) l Americon Society of Civil Engineers, Full Member Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Full Member Fulbright Scholarship, Stonford University 1 Dominion Bridge Co. Fellowship, McGill University
{ Joponese Government Schotorship at ISSEE, regarding dynamic testing studies l
l l
i i
i
!O i
f
t id STANISLAV FABIC Principal Scientist l EDUCATION
~
Ph.D. Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley i Nuclear Engineering, University of Californio, Berkeley
- M.S.
ME. Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Austrollo l Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australlo B.E.
! Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Yugoslavia i
i
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE 1982 - Present Principal Scientist, TERA Corporation.
1973 - 1981 Chief, Analysis Development Branch, Nuclear Regulatory l Commission. Supervised professionals (all GS-IS grade) engaged l
' in monoging various research progrcuns, coducted. of five National Laboratories and various universities in the area of analysis development and verificotton, for opplication to nuclear As a Branch Chief, safety. Yearly budget over $10 M.
responsible for identification of gools, plans, work programs, selection of contractors, review of work progress, and reporting of accomplishments to NRC higher level management, Commissioners, Advisory Committee for Reactor Sofeguards, and Congressional Committees. From July 1979 was a member of the Senior Executive Service.
Chairman of the NRC/RES Containment Review Group.
j Member of the following: (a) NRC/RES Advanced Code Review Group, (b) NRC/RES Code Assessment Review Group, (c)
F (d)
{
CSNI/NEA Working Group on ECCS (Paris, (e)rance), NORHAV 1
CSNI!NEA Working Group on Containments, (Nordic Countries) Revie. Group, and (f) Marviken IV Project l Board (Sweden).
F 1967 - 1973 Advisory Engineer, Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems. At l
Westinghouse, Pittsburgh, involved in the methods development for analyses of the following: (o) blowdowrwinduced forces on l piping, reactor, and steam generator internols; (b) blowdown-j induced thermal and hydraulic transients in the primary coolont system before and offer injection of the emergency coolont; (c) pipe rupture (break opening time); (d) choked two-phase flow
! during blowdown; and (e) steam generator feed-line break j
(hydro-elostic onalysis).
Porticipated in draf ting Westinghouse position statements on l matters pertaining to ECCS hearings.
!O i
i l
.O STANISLAV FABIC Principal Scientist Page 2 t
. At Koiser Engineers, Project Engineer, Kaiser Engineers. (a) Hollogen and 1963 - 1967 Oakland, worked on the following projects:
noble gas removol; (b) blowdown onolyses nuclear rocket exhaust plume at NERVA test facility.
i 1958 - 1963 Research Engineer, institute of Engineer project on transient boiling and bolling incipience, i PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION 1
Americon Nuclear Society Sigmo-Xi l
i 1
lO 4
i l '
A l l
l l
i l i
1-I
}
l l
4
l-i
(* STANISLAV FABIC Principal Scientist Page 3 l
PUBLICATIONS AND1ECTURES
- Books
~
S. FoSic," Review of Existing Codes for Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis", pp.
365-404 in ADVANCES IN NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Vol.10 Edited by E. Y. Henley, Y. Lewins, M. Becker, (P1 anum Publishing Corp.,1977).
S. Fabic, " Accident Analyr.is", Chapter 6.6 in HANDBOOK OF MULTIPHASE SYSTEM, Editor G. Hetsroni, 0-lemisphere Publishing Corp.,1981).
Technical Paper (Sole Author)
"BLODWN-2: Westinghouse APD Computer Program for Calculation of Fluid Pressure, Flow, and Density Transients During a Loss-of-Coolant Accident", ANS Transactions Vol.12, No. I, p. 358 (1969).
" Investigation of Methods for Coupled Structural Hydrodynornic Analysis of
' Reactor Internals" Proceedings, Conference on Flow Induced Vibrations in Reactor System Components, ANL-7685 (1970).
"BLODWN-2 Code Prediction of Pressure Undershoot During Transition from Subcooled to Saturated Blowdown" ANS Transactions Vol.13, No. I, p. 386 (1970).
i "Two- and Three-Dimensional Fluid Transients" ANS Transactions Vol.14, No. I,
- p. 360 (1971).
" Comparisons Between Results of the Westinghouse Loss-of-Coolant Analyses 4
and Semiscale (ECC) Test Data Port 11: BLODWN-2A Code Results," CONF-730304, p. 702 (1973).
" Data Sources for LOCA Code Verification," Nuclear Safety Journal, Vol.17, No.
6, 04ov.-Dec.,1976).
" Computer Codes in Water Reactor Safety: Problems in Modeling of Loss-of-i Coolant Accident," Conf. Heat-Fluid Flow in Water Reactor Safety, Manchester, U.K., poxr C201/77 in Proceedings, Institute of Mechnical Engineers, London, i
i England CSept.1977).
' " Analytical Modeling of Transient Two-Phase Flow," ANS Transactions 1979 Summer Annual Meeting in Atlanto, Georgio, (June 1979).
" Code Assessment for Nuclear Reactor Accident Analysis Programs," 1980 International Conf. on World Nuclear Energy, Washington, D.C., pp. 254-255, ANS Transactions Vol. 35, (1980).
l
-,-_...--_.----,--.,,.,ne. , . - .,_,,,,n_,,,n,,,,, -,,- . , . . , , , , , , . _ - , . , , , _ _ .ym n
4
!k O STANISLAV FABIC Page 4 d
Principal Scientist Reports
- 1. Company Reports (All Sole Author) l
- o. Kaiser Engineers Division of Kolser Industries Corp.
4 I. "Early Blowdown (WATER-HAMMER) Ano!ysis for Loss-of-Fluid Test Facility," 65-28-RA (1965).
l i " Digital Computer Blowdown Analysis for Loss-of-Fluid Test 2.
Focility, Port 1: Engineering," 65-29-R (1965).
I 3. " MERCURY: Digital Computer Program for Heat Transfer Analysis," 66-26-R (1966).
1
! 4. "GASRAD: Digital Computer Program for Calculation of Thermal Radiation from Plumes," 67-II-R (1967).
- 5. " Computer program WHAM for Calculation of Pressure, l Velocity, and Force Transients in Liquid Filled Piping i
Networks," 67-49-R (1967).
- b. Westinghouse, Nuclear Energy Systems, PWR Systems Division l
i
- l. "BLODWN-2: Digital Computer Program for Calculation of j
Hydraulic Transients During a Loss-of-Coolont Accident,"
WCAP-7235 (1968).
J1
- 2. " Tornado Induced Water Removal from Spent Fuel Storage Pool," WCAP 7313-L (1969).
i
" Topical Report, Loss-of-Coolant Analysis: Comparison ,
i 3. i Between BLODWN-2 Code Results and Test Dato," WCAP-7401
!l (1969).
1 j 4. "Colculation of Less-of-Coolant Through a Propogoting Longitudinal Crock, Using the Modified BLODWN-2 Code,"
i i WCAP-7405 (1969).
t I 5. " Preliminary Report on Synthesis of Equivalent Piping Networks
} for Blowdown Analysis of the Reactor Primary Coolont System,
- with BLODWNc2 Code," WCAP-7421-L (1969).
- 6. " Description of the BLODWN-2 Computer Code," WCAP-7593 l
(1970).
l, l
iN h 7. " Application of BLODWN-2 Code to PWR Lo.ss-of-Coolant Analysis," WCAP-7489 (1970).
- 8. " Feed-Line Break Analysis for Model-D Steam Generator,"
! WCAP-8158 (1973).
4
1
( ) STANISLAV FABIC - Page 5 v Principal Scientist 11.
Government Sponsored Reports: Reactor Technoloay TID-4500 Issued by Institute of Engineering Research, University of California,
~
Berkeley, under AEC Contract AT(ll-1)-34, Project 42: -" Reactor Heat Transients Project".
1.
" Reactor Heat Trancients Research, Annual Summary Report," SAN-1002, TID-4500,16th Edition (Nov.1961) (co-author).
- 2. " Reactor Heat Transients Research,1962 Annual Report," SAN-1007, TlD-4500,18th Edition (March 1963) (co-author).
- 3. " Vapor Nucleation on Surfaces Subjected to Transient Heating: Ph.D.
Thesis," SAN-1008, TID-4500 (August 1964) (sole author). .
- 4. "A High Pressure Test Focility for Transient Boiling Studies," SAN-1010, TID-4500 (June 1963) (principal author).
111. Reports issued by Nuclear Reaulatory Commission S. Fabic and P.S. Andersen," Plans for Assessment of Best Estimate LWR Systems Codes," NUREG-0676 (July 1981).
Lectures (All Invited)
" Design Basis Accidents and Containment Criteria for LWR's" Presented at IAEA Interregional Training Course on Nuclear Power Plant Construction and Operations Management, at Argonne National Laboratory.
(Courses sponsored by the 1,nternational Atomic Energy Agency).
Lectures presented during:
I. Fall Session (Sept.-Dec.,1976),
- 2. Spring Session (Jan.-April,1977),
f
- 3. Fall Session (Oct.-Nov.,1977).
- 4. " Emergency Core Cooling System Performance," Two lectures presented at the IAEA Trotning Course in Nuclear Power Safety Analyses Review, at f Argonne National Laborofory (Sept.1978).
l S. " Nuclear Reactor Sofety Applications," Lecture presented at the course, "Two-Phase Flow" of Drexel University (Continuing Professional Education),
Philadelphia (Dec.18,1978).
!O
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - - . . . . _ - . - - - . , . , _ , . . . - . - , - _ - . _ - - - _ . _ ,-,_._,__--.v.,,-,-,,,_,w.,-,._,,,2__, ,%,w_.,,,,-n,..,,,w,%
1 i
1
' r( ' STANISLAV FABIC Page 6 1
l' r
Principal Scientist 1
s 6. " Survey of LOCA Computer Codes," (Lecture #LWRS/80/7) and "LOCA l Computer Code Assessment," (Lecture #LWRS/80/II), Two lectures presented at the ISPRA Course (1980) titled " Thermal-hydraulic Problems Related to LWR Sofety", sponsored by Commission of the European Communities Joint Research Center, ispra, Italy (May 19-23,1980).
- 7. " Application of Computer Codes to Resolution of LWR Safety issues /'
Lecture presented at a Seminor on Two-Phase Flow, Mossochusetts Institute of Technology (April 30,1981).
Panels
- l. As a member of the panel on " Loss of Coolant Accidents in Nuclear Reactors," Eighth National Heat Transfer Conference (ASME-AICHE), in Los Angeles, presented a discussion of methods of blowdown analysis (August 8,1965).
- 2. " Summary Review of Meeting Highlights - Understanding NSSS Response to Design Basis Everts /' presented at ANS Thermal Reactor Safety Meeting at Sun Valley, Idaho (August 1977).
- 3. " Problems in Simulation of Nuclear Reactor Plant Thermal Hydraulics for Postulated Small and Intermediate Break Accidents," presented at the Simulation and Analysis Panel, Working Conference on Advanced Electro Technology Applicottons to Nuclear Power Plants, sponsored by NRC and IEEE, Washington, D.C. (Jan. 15-17, 1980).
- 4. "How Good the Codes Have To Be," Third CSNI Specialist Meeting on Transient Two-Phase Flow, California Institute of Technology (March 1981).
i l
O~
l l
l
't i ALBERT V. MARTORE j Principal Engineer - Construction Services 1
I l EDUCATION 1
B.S., Civil Engineering, Massachusetts institute of Technology Graduate Studies, Business Monogement, Horvord University i
i
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE t
- Mr. Mortore has over 30 years of experience in engineering and construction, j
with on expertise in the creo of structural engineering. His extensive experience includes all areas of light and heavy construction, commercial, and Industrial j
projects, both domestically and internationally. As Vice President of Prescon 4
Corporation and President of North East Post-tensioning Consultants, Inc., he
- has been responsible for the entire range of engineering and construction J octivities, including conceptual and final design; specificotton, fabricotton, and supply of construction materials; preparation of design drawings and specificottons; construction monogement, scheduling, supervision, and Inspection.
in addition, he was directly involved In' the design and construction of nuclear lO plant containment structures for Arkansas I and 2; Crystal River 3; Calvert Cliffs I and 2; Oconee I,2 and 3; and Turkey Point 3.
}
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Registered Professional Engineer, Mossochusetts Member, American Society of Civil Engineers l
i
- Member, Americon Concrete institute i
i 1
TERA CORPORATION
O
. (.)
J0tN ANGELO Senior Systems Engineer -
. EDUCATION Groducte , Mothematics, Physics, Chemistry, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, Studies New York Solid and Fluid Mechanics, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
M.S. Engineering, Union College, Schenectady, New York B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho SPECIAllZED TRAINING COURSES Steam Turbine Supervisors Course, Genero! Electric Company Fluid Mechanics, General Electric Company Heat Transfer, General Electric Company -
Advanced Engineering Program, General Electric Company
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Angelo has thirty years of engineering experience covering a brood ~ronge of responsible assignments as a test, performance, insto!!ation and maintenance engineer for the General Electric Turbine Division; development and design of fluid systems and components for nuclear plants; supervisory and management experience on nuclear projects for the U.S. Navy; technical expert for the U.S. Army Engineers Reactor Group; and management of safety and licensing reviews of nuclear power plant construction permits and operating licenses for the Atomic Energy Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ,
1981 - Present Senior Systems Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1972 - 1980 Task Monocer for Systems interaction Iri Nuclear Power Plants, Unresolved Sofety issues Program, NRC. This included monoging a program for modeling nuclear plant systems and their interdependencies using foult trees, and developing methodologies for the purpose of identifying potential interactions between - redundant systems or subsystems os o result of physical or spatial interconnections.
Senior Licensing Project Manager, NRC. Managed the octivities osso- .
cioted with the safety review ond evoluotion of applications for con-struction permits and operating licenses. ,
1964 - 1972 Bronch Chief, Nuclear Engineering Bronch, Naval Focilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy. Supervised the work of a number of engineers with responsibilities for engineering evoluotions of nuclear projects for the shore-based novo! nuclear program. .
t sre L TFRA CORPCQATION
' , j~
7 e !
< ANGELO, J0tN '~
- ,. -~ Page 2 1963 - 1964 Mechanical Engineer, U.S. Army Engineers Reactor Gro 3
- ' wide variety of engineering ossignments as o mechanicoY. e ineering in Perform the design, operation, molntenance, installation, testing inspection
! of power plants, systems and components.
1960 - 1963 Mechanical Engineer, Performed design engineering for fluid systems and components for,the Nuclear Power Division of ALCO Products, Inc.
and ALLIS CHALMERS MANUFACTURING CO, including transient j onalysis and final safety analysis for nuclear reactors.
I j 1949 - 1958 Development Engineer, Large Steam Turbine-Generator Dept., General Electric Co. Provided specialized onelysis of steam turbine and heat i
cycle performance in centrol power plants. Responsible for planning, j performing, and onolyzing the results of tests of power plant heat cycles
- for design improvements of large steam turbines. Developed specialized instrumentation ond-doto gathering techniques needed to obtain the i'
design information.
Turbine Supervisor, Genero! Electric Co. Responsible for general work j in the installation, startup and maintenance of steam turbine generators
! in centrol power plants, including turbine vibration balancing.
. Performance Engineer, Lorge Steom-Turbine Dept., General Electric Co.
! Responsible for planning and performing overall efficiency and heat j, cycle performance tests-in centrol power plants, including supervision j
and instruction of test personnel and calculation and analysis of test results for design information and contract obligations.
REGISTRATION Professiono! Engineer in the State of Mossochusetts
^
i i
4 I
J e
i
!O I
4 TERA CORPORATION
- , A
~
b s 1 ,
i, A +
i #
s 4 ,
- ;~
^
( -- l p -
N JOSEPH PENZIEN s -
i- s - e i Senior Scientist m s _ ~ .,.
. .g s .
, a u s, Sc.D. Civil Engineering, Mossochu:etts Institute of Technology , '[ , '
B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Wo:hington ._
s Summary of Experlei.a
^
$. 'q Dr. Penzien has had over thirty-five years of, experience in structural engineering,
- irstuding twenty-seven years on the factulty of the University of Californio at Berke
- ey.
He is the Director of the Earthquake Engineering Research Center at the UC Berkeley.
Dr. Penzien is on expert in the seismic response of structures including highway bridges.
i Professiono! Affiliations American Society of Civil Enginars Structural Er.gineers Association of California Earthquake Engineering Research Institute -
Seismological Society of America American Concrete Institute .
Honors 1959 NSF Post Doctoral Fellowship 1965 Research Prize, ASCE 1969 NATO Senior Science Fellowship
' 1973 NSF Senior Science Fellowship 1977 Electec Member, National Academy of Engineering
. 1978 Elected Fellow, American Accdemy of Mechanics --
1979 Elected Honorary Member, Peruvian Assoc. of Earthquake Engineering 1980 Silver Medal of Ports l.
- j p.
,t
- MARTIN B. JONES, JR.
c Senior Project Manager p
! Education B.S.E.E. The Citadel, Charleston, South Carolino .
- ' Summary of Experience j
l l During Mr Jones' twenty-two years He ofhas responsible also had direct experi l
projects built by both union and non-union contractors. responsibilit ,
}
~
records monogement programs and systems.
i 1980 Senior Project Monoger, TERA Corporation.
i 1975 - 1980 Manage of Construction, South Carolino Electric & Gas Co.Among Mr. Jones was responsible for all major company construction activities.
! his primary responsibilities with S.C.E.&G.CO. were the $200 million Fairfield Pumped Storoge Focility (8 60MW units; completed in 1978) and 2
the $800 million Summer Station (scheduled for completion in 1981).
I Quality Control Monoger, S.C.E.&G.CO. Mr. Jones esioblished and lJ 1973 - 1975 organized a quality control group within the Construction Depoetment He was i for the construction of V.C. Summer Unit I (960MW PWR).
responsible for hiring and training inspectors, warehousemen and records y
p personnel. He developed and implemented the initial quality control, worehousing and records monogement systems for the Summer Project.
Senior Construction Supervisor, S.C.E.&G.CO. Mr. Jones orgonized o l
1969 - 1973 Construction Department electrical startup group. He directed the l check-out and startup of Wateree Units I & 2 (350 MW-cool) and
- j. WilliamsI(650MW-heavy oil). He was otso responsible for check-out of 1
Saludo Hydro Unit 5, a 75MW expansion of an existing plant, i
1963 - 1969 I&E Engineer, Project Engineer, Corolinos Virginio Nuclear Power f
J Association, Inc. Mr. Jones was engaged in a federolly funded R&D progrom during operation of the prototype plant (CVTR). He was also in
! chorge of on 18-month progrom nn containment teokoge and simulated steem-break occidents following shut-down. Mr. Jones was engaged in a responsible role in decomissioning this plant.
South Corolino Industries. Mr. Jones participated in the startup of a 1963 Kraf t Paper Mill in Florence, South Carolina, l
Staff Electrical Engineer, Plant Instrument Supervisor, Carolinos 1959 - 1963 Mr. Jones was involved in design-Virginia Nuclear Power Assoclotion.
i inn, bui! ding and operating a prototype nuclear power plant of Porr, l
South Carolino.
1 Assistant Electrical Superintendent, South Carolino Electric & Gas 1 1958 - 1959 Company. Mr. Jones porticipated in the construction of two 125MW co l fired units.
( b 4
TERA CORPORATION
.g i
LENNY R.LAAKSO
'. Senior Associate Structural Engineer I ,
EDUCATION
- B.S.C.E. Tufts University,1974 M.S.C.E. Massachusetts institute of Technology,1976 l i
l l
SUMMARY
GF EXPERIENCE
-Mr.Lookso has seven years of experience os a structural engineer in the power industry, primority in the structural analysis and desip of buildings and equipment for nuclear, hydroelectric, and fossil fuel power plants.
1 1
- 1980 - Present Sr. Associate Structural Engineer, TERA Corporation Lead Structural Engineer, Riley Stoker Corporot!on, Worcester, Mass.
f Responsible for analysis and design of steam generator support struc-l tures from review of customer specificottons through completion of construction. Designs boiler intimate steel for high temperature service.
i Determines feasibility of modifications to existing structures. Estab-lishes and molntoins structural engineering schedules and provides tech-I j
nical guidance to personnel in the group. Writes department technical i
standards.
1977 - 1980 Leod Civil Engineer, Hydroelectric Power Division, Chas. T. Main, Inc.,
l Responsible for final civil and structural design of Boston, Mass.
l powerhouse, intoke structure, spillway, roods, and bridges for 600 MW
[ Shiroro Hydroelectric Project; scheduling and opproval of construction j
drawings; development of structural design criterio; review of specifico-tions. Administered technical aspects of contract for spillway radial gates, intoke gates, and draft tube gates. Conducted technical studies and reviewed contractor submittals for the Construction Manager.
Supervised conceptual design phase for Merrill Creek Reservoir Project.
Civil Engineer, C.T. Main. Analysis and design of reinforced concrete
} structures; review of construction drawings; review of vendors' calculo- l
! tions and drawings.
}
l 1974 - 1977 Engineer, Structural Mechanics Section, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston Mass. Seismic onolysis of nuclear power ploc's; i onolysis and design of steel support frame for polcr crone; evoluoted design of concrete shear walls for seismic and wind loods; finite onolysis J N. '
of stress in concrete ring girder.
s TERA CORPORATION- -
LENNY R. LAAKSO PAGE 2 o
(w) 1973 - 1974 Engineering Aide, Planning t3ro, Oh, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waltham, Mass. Collected and organized technical dato relating to i water resource projects; studied feasibility of structural e.d nonstruc- l
. tural flood control measures. l PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS i
! Registered Professional Engineer (Structural), Mossochusetts
,! Member, American Society of Civil Engineers i HONORS & PUBLICATIOtB i
- Graduated summa com loude from Tufts
- Elected to Tau Beta Pi, National Engineering Honor Society Desian of Offshore Gravity Plotforms, thesis presented at MIT,1976 I
i i
1 i
l l
l l-1 1
4 4
0 1 TERA CORPORATION
. _