ML20052A751

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
QA Program Policy-List of Definitions, Revision 11
ML20052A751
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 11/18/1981
From:
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML20052A738 List:
References
NUDOCS 8204290124
Download: ML20052A751 (23)
v • d • e


Text

. .

//, . /, , / J /" /'

Page x QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM POLICY Revision 11 3 M POWK LIST OF DEFINITIONS Date 11/18/81 )

i Safety-Related - 1he term spplied to:

Sert.ctures, systems, components, materials, services or Operational Safety Actions cr Activities named on the Q-List as necessary to assure:

1. The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary.
2. The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a saf e condition.
3. The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of an accident which could result in potential off-site expositres to individuals in excess of exposures specified in 10 CTR 100.
4. The operation of the facility within Technical Specifications limits and Nuclear Regulatory Requirements.

Secondary Standard - An item of measuring and test equipment (M&TE) used to cali-brate other M&TE. They are periodically calibrated using Reference Standards and reserved for use in the calibration of working plant or field M&TE.

Section - A subdivision of s department, usually made along lines of a technical specialty; eg, Nuclear Licensing, Realth Physics, Nuclear yuel, etc.

Services - Work performed by an organization or department having no deliverable hardware type and item other than the results of construction, modifications, repsirs, inspections, audits, reviews, etc.

Source Inspection - Inspection of an item at a Supplier's facility during its manuf acture, or at conpletion of manufacture, to verify implementation of the procure-ment requirements.

f Spara Part - An item availabla for replacement for an item in use.

l Special Nuclear Material (SNM) -

1. Plutonius, Uranium 233; uranium enriched in the Isotope 233 or in the Isotope l

'  ?.35; and any other material which the NRC, pursuant to the provisions of Section 51 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as amended, determines to be special nuclear material, but does not include source sacerial; or

2. Any material artificially enriched by any of the foregoing, but does not in-clude source material.

f l

Special Process - Those metallurgical, chemical, or other processes where assurance I of the process activity is dependent on the use of qualified procedures, personnel, or equipment; and where assurance of quality cannot be by direct inspection of the l

in-process activity or final product. These include, but are not limited to, welding, ,]

heat-treating, NDE and environments; 4 sting of the work process.

l w) 82 04 29 old

MIDLAND 162-FSAR regulations, guidelines, or other factors separate and distinct from the components of the system itself. The system is considered as a unit, with boundaries as defined by Begulatory (

Guide 1.70 and must meet specific requirements. The design bases describe all essential characteristics of the system with sufficient clarity so that an experienced engineer, using these design bases and material referenced in the design bases, can understand the functions of the system with respect to the rest of the plant. Items implicit to contemporary design (e . g. , use of the English system of weights and measures or the exercise of good engineering practice) are not specified.

1.1.2.2.1 safety Design Bases saf ety design bases directly establish or increase nuclear safety. Safety design bases provide for or assure the following:

a. The integrity of the reacter coolant pressure boundary
b. The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown conditicn
c. The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents that could result in potential of f site exposures comparable to the guideline exposures of 10 CFR 100
d. The accomplishment of specific structure, system, or (

component requirements which are important to safety The control room operator action is considered an one of the fundamental means of achieving these criteria.

Safety-related structures, systems, and components important to saf ety are the portions of systems which are indispensable to nuclear safety. Items which are associated with safety-related equipment but which do not perform a nuclear safety function are not safety-related.

Redundancy requirements and system performance conditions are considered a feature of the equipment's capability to shut down the reactor safely or to prevent or mitigate accidents.

1.1.2.2.2 Power Generation Design Pases Power generation design bases are those design bases which are not related to nuclear plant safety. They need not relate directly to the generation of power; however, they relate at least indirectly to power generaticn in the sense that all station requirements which are not imposed for safety reasons support the major function of 2he station as a whole; i.e., the generation of electrical power and process steam. An example of

(

1.1-4

e 6

~"

e ,

SA . .

} <

i ,

1 3 3. or,si y .

h b* ,

j' y i H ,tl

- e .gs . .

\ L ',. . u e. ..,,

.e < -

'\

e

)M n, alg,

.z y y8 . l$,

a;,i ..

' ..._u.:~ . m ' :: . . . , .

4  :

' - W EBM l '

t s t., r --J, l, J.

p

' -n;l

[ T I

$a ' w[l Q 9 i E } s; '

o l

's IA ! it se..

3 l( j '- g1 if.; -. <el

' ,,, tin g >l w8

[; ; ..

g ,

  1. g M *og Q -

, a > W'%Q ,

Te e m s@! .o <~

s Js

!} '

y'..; go ,,,

U' ~ #

4

"' Gj

3. ..a

' < i '. j' a( ci- f

!  ;! ' '; 'ggj iM ".ej- '

sa '

!,w .o c

.i' i! .Q-4 as f -

e :.p%w:/fl s g .g ,

a-

=_

a' .,h. -

s'd. a f' w ji I '

  1. , 'll 1g IF
  • j 3, ..g g 'M (9)

!UU 8E3

, i6 4! M m.

J,1. ,

W

<e-/Sh.%f.d......

?~4',TT g 1

w' ' g On.

1*? -

M, , a:

, . ' 'g -\ .,,

.eje) 3 ;gi . ....A

. I*$'dG

') s- .s!

p ,

.'l , i I Mg ;.i' b e<-

g I ..$ r, .iIahi h', lt r; tu l

', p , i. <J

y- .

lJ r ,1, :./ 3/z,j ,

RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION DATE: March 8,1982, 3:30 pm PROJECT: Midland RECORDED BY: Joseph D. Kane CLIENT; TALKED WITH: Bechtel CPC GEI NRC J. Anderson T. Thruvengadam S. Poulos J. Kane M. Das Gupta K. Razdan ROUTE T0: INFORMATION G. Lear L. Heller ,

vD. Hood F. Rinaldi S. Poulos H. Singh -

R. Landsman J. Kane MAIN SUBJECT OF CALL: ADOPTED SOIL SPRING STIFFNESSES USED_IN DESIGN OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING AND START OF PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION l ITEMS DISCUSSED:

1. Attachments 1 and 2 to this telephone record provide the design cases and soil spring stiffnesses adopted by Bechtel as soils input in their structural analysis of the Auxiliary Building. The values of stiffness also on Attachment 2 under the column labeled NRC are the results of extensive discussions between NRC Consultants. S. Poulos, GEI, H. Singh, COE and J. Kane, NRC and represent the staff and its Consultants
determination of the range of reasonable stiffness values which should be l

considered in design. The NRC values had been provided to Bechtel via telephone on March 5,1982 as committed to by the Staff in the meeting of February 26, 1982 in Bethesda.

The NRC recommended value of 70 KCF for the Main Auxiliary Building versus the Applicant's adopted 30 KCF for Case 2 is important because j this difference has the potential to affect settlements which are to be l tolerated during underpinning. Allowable' settlements using the l stiffness of 30 KCF had been provided on February 26, 1982 by M. DasGupta of Bechtel Corp.

l I

i

t l

3

2. Following considerable discussion on NRC recommended stiffness values I]

(in both March 5 and March 8 telephone calls), Consumers expressed a willingness to use these values in their structural . analysis but indicated the time needed to complete the required computer runs would i impact their Phase 2 construction plans. As an alternative, J. Kane suggested that Phase 2 work be subdivided into two parts, the initial

! one beginning with work which would not affect the EPA and Control

. Tower area and the second part beginning after the analysis using the

NRC reconnended stiffness values had been completed by CPC and the results evaluated by the NRC staff. An acceptable line of demarcation between these two portions of Phase 2 work' was tentatively identified as '

column lines 2.5 and 10.5 on the Construction Sequence drawing.provided for the underpinning work at the February 3-5 design audit. These lines, respectively, are sufficiently west and east of the EPA and Control Tower to conclude that these structures would be unaffected by underpinning operations permitted by this initial portion of Phase 2 work.

3. Consumers agreed to provide a letter to NRC giving details which would permit the Staff,to fully understand what work would be performed under j this initial portion of Phase 2 work.
4. The following comments were given to. Consumers concerning the monitoring 4

plans during underpinning of the Auxiliary Building.

a. Drawing C-1493(Q), " Monitoring Matrix," should be updated and values provided in the tolerance criteria column for staff concurrence before i any portion of Phase 2 work is started.
b. Sheet 8 of M. DasGupta's presentation on February 26, 1982 does not agree h!th previous drawings provided (Drwgs. C-1490 (Q) and C-1491-(Q)). Corrections in proper labeling of the deep seated bench mark ~

l locations on Sheet 8 and on Sheet 10 are needed and should be provided to the NRC.

c. NRC expressed a concern for measurement of horizontal movement between the EPA and the Turbine Building and between the Control Tower and the Turbine Building during underpinning operations and suggested three L monitoring devices be installed. One device at the top of each wing of .

the EPA's and one at the top of the Control Tower'was recommended.

Consumers responded that they were now planning to place instruments at those locations in response to questions raised by ASLB but had not  ;

yet updated the monitoring locations on Drawings C-1490(Q), C-1491(Q) and C-1493(Q). The Staff indicated that criteria on tolerable relative horizontal movement for these instruments should be established and furnished on the Monitoring Matrix drawing along with the basis for -

these limits.

d. As previously discussed at the February 26, 1982 meeting in Bethesda, the Staff anticipates a submittal by Consumers identifying the acceptance criteria for the strain gages to be placed at E1.659 on the Auxiliary Building.
5. Consumers indicated that the six deep seated bench mark instruments located on Sheet 8 of M. DasGupta's presentation will be in operation -

before beginning Phase 2 work. Installation of the additional instruments at top of the EPA's and Control Tower and the strain gages at El 659 and the results of the structural analysis using NRC recommended stiffness valves are to be completed before the second portion of Phase 2 work is started.

6. J. Kane indicated that subdivision of Phase 2 underpinning work into two portions is subject to the approval of NRC Project Management and Structural Engineering Branch. It was also indicated that other conditions which could affect the start of Phase 2 work may be identified by the Staff. The original intent of this telephone conference call was to discuss soil spring stiffnesses but was not intended to address the start of Phase 2 work.

4 e

t

, fg *'p NArhm6M' k,

.. l

( / .. /- / ] -

.' t. . .i.

S o n. Se c , a c,. Swacss ES . .

C?..r.g.s G *-1 5.Ic d3 W d

/. Norin a./ .f~o;/ S y ,ug s -

.sy, ny s u.saj .so .

s*epo.e.s.u,1'- .S e/6 d.e -fo e a.r-ra/ys/c of

,sYeaft rc.:. -for gra s'~sSA R. /o a.o'in co >-rdifsborS .

(A sru6 ca s c. a f -i ll-rit is f e- f.eisntic. .

co nd A'on). ,

2 D.u..c..f.in.g.. .c.o. n.. di,%. . , .. . .s. p .n5- . s u sect. .Jo to .

.cu,+ .

. rub <eas. 4J analysu of -exkHng .r/aAa.p<f o

.;; <-e sc. t., .Nh e .cA- s e..

3. ...Lo.,y. Tekn, . Se N b <-d G n d Mra-r - S n4 c4 repn t'- ~1'h M* v' b - AN% ' S S ~ p,c.,>,3s h< *-e.. ele <.e-. .

,lo . cec.o.,d conrondah b>, c f f % . r A ,a6<.s J/e. . . .. . /o ck .- of/ _ ..._' .

. - _ . . . .*..~. . .

+ . . . , . . . , _

r

.t. . -$.- Gre. l . cw.e. La seck.. .o-1 .s* W/on~<,i

'7%c da:fa'.. cpring&ed..'

.s67% 2> '-rc.a_. . /97a.,d...-A4.e L. . */oa.ct sa', e ,.,,, ,t.

Added .. +A.e ..a=eis *<~ t. . . :_-.

ci&i 3. theJ

.subca.ce.' +4e ' spu-Q.c a s e_ ba .c.co/ on r'Le . rr W / ~ r.1

. -A nr.e ._.... .)=o. ..

p. tee / /H r% e. .Ctitn t ic. .... h1Ocf.el *. - . . C. . .... .. .- . .-. ... .. . . . .

Foe . r'A<.- Je c.ond cas.c ( -exis /r 'y co>rd Won) 'h. .

.s,oes 3 h s. .c<>-a ... co ~p u,42 art ..-M< . . ce. r de~.- J -eo.c4 a rea. . u.ss '< r e/asA'c. . '.ho/A.rpuce. ' Skeo y a. ,d a.c.rudy -

s .f. l.e,a.;,..p.a. 3.,Co.;,..,,S . ............._..',... .. . .

~

_,. ..,.'.- .- - . ,+=._:.c. ...a t ......:.

-. - .... a....u.

k.......,

. ~ -

Fo - -/4 <.: 1, . ./.o._ n..  :.r.. . M. ._..-

e

c. _. f.. 4.c : s

~ . <. i..s. .

.a .  :.:, . . . . ..u n . . . .s..p,..

u.-:.. . .-

u .. . . - -.... ..,..

J/eoc. ,.y.A. d..A.<...:a.c:.v .s.e.s..Me. . . . t.' a f...ryy.. .

d ?<..... . .

.n.. . ..k.t.6%. c/ed.. ^..-.t.s:<DLe. . "-

n._. ...,.n..-

yO9c. .

. o .

y. .. 'cye.

,y, wp.. r.y.,oayy;-

,/,gg. ..y;;,  : . %. ;37. 1 ..- .;.~

ny..i.t....

le .,b. .

. _ a.4: . . . . . .

e , . , . . * . - -

n ~- -.

. .- . 1 . .

.. - v...'s.v 3l/bCkEt5'4..v ~

.ac7.........' r'; kbs) Ng h.',,C b ,, N. 5 5.h 3

,, ;hg. .i.,. .-,, a.it' A ...

a.

CO+ff/

.:,,, . . . - .. ~ ..

Y,.'T .*-W.o .- $.:c..

. . m.Y... ..s 'o % st' . . '. .

. vel;2. .Lelllt'. Jucu .e. .-f*lA2." N ..!.Walh.- 0.W'. .. kvi/a's.* ' '

.tf f.h$$ &hSN"/-k[$d'f- S $lOe .]-a5~ 'so'  : N U-

O MiT SPfttuG STtFF hlESSE.5 (KCF)

Iye. sign Co,Mion s bEC.WTE L

E.P. A c.T. MA E.P. A. C . T. M.A.

c ase t l

! N or,,,oi 4 1 s pim p

\Bo' lBD So Au.eh toIN'?sC .

l Case 2 , j Enshng Condiho, IT \E> So k cep kble lo M ., TO I -

1 I

Case 3(ah 41 0 350 i,16 o IBo 240 580 1.on3T urnMke,c,p ,

Case 3M

\(oo 35o 25 0 Acceyta'ble 40 Int LongTennSe b ent i 7 l E.P.A. -Eiechnc.nl behuhm hwm h y

4 C .T. - Cenbi Towee M . A. - Mom Auuhofg butidm3 $

to i

i

[b '/' 3hy's'( ENCLOSURE 2 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITIES FOR SPECIFICATION C.194 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITIES 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this QA Plan is to provide the means by which to gain adequate confidence that the Service Water Pump Structure underpinning system is constructed according to design documents. This Plan describes the minimum procedural interfacing between the sub-contractor, contractor, consultant (s) and the Midland Project Quality Assurance Department. (MPQAD) 2.0 SUBMITTAL, REVIEW AND APPROVAL FOR Q-LISTED PROCEDURES 2.1 The procedures listed in Exhibit A will be submitted as a minimum by the subcontractor as specified in the contract documents.

2.2 The procedures will be routed for review, comment and approval according to the flow diagram in Exhibit B.

2.3 The groups responsible for review, comument and approval of procedures will be as specified in Exhibit A.

3.0 CALIBRATION OF SUBCONTRACTOR FURNISHED EQUIPMENT 3.1 All subcontractor-furnished jacks, gages, and construction equipment requiring calibration will be calibrated by an agency approved and audited by MPQAD.

4.0 QUALITY ACTIVITIES 4.1 Section 4.3 provides the Q-List. All Q-Listed hardware and installation will be performed in accordance with the Midland

. e

= .

ENCLOSURE 2 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITIES FOR

. SPECIFICATION C-194 Project Quality Assurance Program, and will be inspected by the Contractor's Quality Control organization and overinspected by the MPQAD. All other Q-Listed activities will also be performed in accordance with the Program and will be controlled by the Contractor's QC organization and the MPQAD.

I 4.2 Within thirty days prior to the scheduled start of but not limited to the following activities, meetings will be held between responsible personnel of Bechtel Construction Remedial Soils Group, MPQAD, Contractor QC and the Subcontractor. The adequacy and availability of technical criteria; Quality Control inspection plans; Subcontractor's procedures; schedule of Construction activites; the sequence and clarity of Q-List activities will be i

discussed.

i

1. Start excavution below 620'.
2. Start of final load transfer and lockoff.

1 I

4.3 For any work relating to the service water pump structure l unde rpinning , the following activities will be Q-Listed. This is l

l intended to be a complete Q-List for all activites unique to underpinning other than design activities. Not all of these activities, hovaver, will be within the Subcontractor's scope of work.

1. Document submittal, interface and control, i

i

2. Procuring Q-Listed items and materials.
3. Storage, handling and control of Q-Listed materials.

g.i. __w w- . , , 3 y . ,-

, - -+-, - - , ,,--- g .-, , . - . -p pp _ .--, .-w,

ENCLOSURE 2 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITIES FOR SPECIFICATION C-194

4. Furnishing and installation of lagging and bracing under "Q" structures.
5. Excavation limits, control and sequence under "Q" structures.
6. Crack mapping and evaluation.
7. Calibration, maintenance, control and installation of sages and settlement monitoring instrumentation.
8. Monitoring of building movement instrumentation and pier pressure gages.
9. Fines monitoring of dewatering wells in "Q" areas.
10. Location and protection "Q" utilities.
11. Geotechnical aceptance of subgrade.
12. Fabrication and installation of reinforcing steel.

r 13. Certification of personnel performing splices.

14. Threading of reinforcing steel and installation of necnanical splices.
15. Drilling in ' Q" structures for the installation of anchor bolts, rock anchors and dewatering wells.
16. Installation and inspection of anchor bolts and rock anchors.
17. Compressible material configuration and installation.

l i

18. Testing of reinforcing steel and mechanical splices.

ENCLOSURE 2 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITIES FOR SPECIFICATION C-194

19. Installation, inspection and testing of structural concrete, lean concrete, grout and drypack.
20. Repair of concrete in "Q" structures.
21. Calibrating, maintaining, installing and controlling of hydraulic jacks and pressure gages.
22. Load transfer activites.

4

23. Backfilling and acceptance testing for access shafts and tunnels in "Q" areas.

l l

l l

I l

Procedures To Be Submitted By The Subcontractor .

Orginization Racpsnsible For Procedure Rrview & Approval a

e M

a a  % %Q

& St TE T DM 44 33 ## #dt Q 88 838 *ft 8

A

mu$mou M$ k Hu88 Procedure for general underpinning - This procedure X 0 0 X X 0 shall include the overall concept of the work involved, including the interface of all the operations listed below.

Procedure for load transfer. X 0 0 X 4 X 0 Procedure for placement of lean concrete backfill in X 0 X X shafts and tunnel.

Procedure for installation of (including mixing) and X 0 X X pressure grouting.

Procedure for placement of pier concrete. X 0 X X Procedure for acquiring and maintaining calibration X 0 X X of Jacks and gages.

Procedure for mechanical splicing of reinforcement. X 0 X X Procedure for threading of reinforcing steel. X 0 X X Procedure for installation of anchor bolts and rock X 0 X X anchors.

LEGEND Procedure for installation of compressible material. X 0 X X REVIEW & APPROVAL - X Procedure for placing reinforcement including X 0 X X bending steel reinforcement (hot and cold). REVIEW & cot 9 TENT - O as applicable Procejure for core drilling. X 0 X X ENCLOSURE 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 0F 2

Procedures To Be Submitted By The Subcontractor Orgenization Raspcasible For Precedure R view & Apprcval 8

m u YE

& Et TE ODo 34 o

33 2"oco#40 Q E!

to o oga cr og Procedure for concrete repairs.

N 50 $0$5&O k 00 X 0 X X Procedure for excavation "Q" structures and the X. O O X X installation of lagging.

Procedure for protection of underground utilities X 0 X X Procedure for preparing, submitting, and revising X 0 X X Q procedures.

Procedure for handling, storing, and controlling X 0 X X Contractor-furnished materials.

Procedure for design document control. X 0 0 X i Procedures for interface and coordination X 0 0 0 X between the Subcontractor and the Contractor for activities covered by the QA Program.

i Procedure for certifying Subcontractor Personnel X 0 X X specifically for AWS welding and mechanical splices.

I.EGEND Procedure for Training Program of Subcontractor X 0 X X Personnel for the Q-Procedures covering the REVIEW & APPROVAL - X Subcontractors scope of work REVIEW & COtMENT - O as applicalbe ENCLOSURE 2 EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 OF 2 l

2 .

A E O G' G4e RE T N AS Pv US I CP Dps ee SH AU N p AX FO ATp <

I E RR E

Na C T G WEeC N N I

EtO Is Il E Ved eon .

RCa l al l [

I [ A.

-

  • L A

G V -

TI N18 N E O g 3

i CR 5 1 O T R .

u.

EEJ. 5 DI AS P P

y2 a

JE 4 T 5 ONlP NA s RT A r S RI PD AN EON NS g 1 E

P GDE WD I

vPE tRM GU Y

NE ER OO4 4T .

E IO V SC0 E N 4 SA ST S.

EO RIC AS A RC -

O -

. - N 3 '

T N R t A OI SS P

H TTA8 M

A C

C E R1 5 AS W J T OISP TE STD T r O RN E D f UE U u L PI NBI IF O O F M IRI G D S C G L

A A GT S E O O L

V OIP L

_ LDS I '

O R

P P  :

- A l

W E

I I V T SS P

E NL 0 A R DE O0 M AS E LMR1 T1 TE STD I t

R EUND I

JUE T

u U FCOI NSI U o D OC F I iF O E D ShIC G G C GT SE O o O OIP L t R

LDS 5 P - " "

~

Y T Y A A A E M NS L R

O ME KIS gTN E K OI LTIOSP O T E F RV 0 ED aM R O

EC T

ULU HRAO CfNT DB w R.E fDA T

vU gDO C w fD I

EIC E SAI M 3 S

CTDR ES I

GE E YEB SED gLA SE UC BNM N FSU II UCN TOI gA N TO A

OE E TVSE A TR CR C E

OEES NRRU TRS SPA gF I SP R

,J l

,(

S S D O R T E E O N I NE NEC T

C B OC IO OIO TR A U S D TR CP R 5 1

E NT CP U Y T E8R AIM U RY R T N TGU A TI T TI O NIE ND E5 SV SVI C

IWC SIU NIT NT .

S G VS OC _

U I AO EE OC CA S RRR RR CA ODP l'

111 l Il

ENCLOSURE 3 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITES FOR SPECIFICATION C-195 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITIES 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this QA Plan is to provide the means by which to gain adequate confident that the Auxiliary Building (Electrical Penetration and control structure) underpinning system and Feedwater Isolation Valve Pit fill material replacement is constructed according to design documents. This Plan describes the minimum procedural interfacing between the sub-contractor, contractor, consultant (s) and the Midland Project Quality Assurance Department. (MPQAD) 2.0 SUBMITTAL, REVIEW AND APPROVAL FOR Q-LISTED PROCEDURES 2.1 The procedures listed in Exhibit A will be submitted as a minimum, by the subcontractor as specified in the ' contract documents.

2.2 The procedures will be routed for review, comment and approval according to the flow diagram in Exhibit B.

2.3 The groups responsible for review, comment and approval of I

l procedures will be as specified in Exhibit A.

3.0 CALIBRATION OF SUBCONTRACTOR FURNISHED EQUIPMENT 3.1 - All subcontractor-furnished jacks, gages, and construction equipment requiring calibration will be calibrated by an agency l

approved and audited by MPQAD.

I l

--,w ~ _ , _ _ .m - , _ - . _ _ ,w, , _ , _ , . _ _ , _ _ , , _ , _ , , _ _ _ _ _ , , _,_ _,_ , , , , _ , , . _ , _ , , . , , , , ,

ENCLOSURE 3 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITES FOR SPECIFICATION C-195 4.0 QUALITY ACTIVITIES 4.1 Section 4.3 provides the Q-List. All Q-Listed hardware and installation will be performed in accordance with the Midland Project Quality Assurance Program, and will be inspected by the Contractor's Quality Control organization and overinspected by the MPQAD. All other Q-Listed activities will also be performed in accordance with the Program and will be controlled by the Contractor's QC organization and the MPQAD.

4.2 Within thirty days prior to the scheduled start of but not limited to the following activities, meetings will be held between responsible personnel of Bechtel Construction Remedial Soils Group, MPQAD, Contractor QC and the Subcontractor. The adequacy and availability of technical criteria; Quality Control inspection plans; Subcontractor's procedures; schedule of construction activities; the sequence and clarity of Q-List activities will be discussed.

1. Start construction of temporary underpinning.
2. Start construction of permanent underpinning wall.
3. Start of final load transfer and lockoff.

4.3 For any work relating to the auxiliary building underpinning, the following activities will be Q-Listed. This is intended to be a complete Q-List for all activites unique to underpinning other than design activities. Not all of these activities, however, will be within the Subcontractor's scope of work.

ENCLOSURE 3 QUALITY PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITES FOR SPECIFICATION C-195

1. Document submittal, interface and control.

I

2. Procuring Q-Listed items and materials. l l

l

3. Storage, handling and control of Q-Listed materials, i

i l 4. Furnishing and installation of lagging and bracing under "Q" l

structures. ,

l l

5. Excavation limits, control and sequence under "Q" structures.

i I .

6. Crack mapping and evaluation.
7. Calibration, maintenance, control and installation of gages and l

settlement monitoring instrumentation.

8. Monitoring of building movement instrumentation and pier pressure gages.
9. Fines monitoring of dewatering wells in "Q" areas.
10. Location and protecta "Q" utilities.

l 11. Geotechnical acceptance of subgrade.

l l

12. Fabrication of steel grillage for temporary supports for "Q" I structures.
13. Fabrications and installation of temporary supports for "Q" structures.
14. Welding of temporary and permanent supports for "Q" structures.
15. Fabrication and installation of reinforcing steel.

l l

l l

  • e ENCLOSURE 3 QUALITf PLAN AND Q-LISTED ACTIVITES FOR SPECIFICATION C-195
16. Certifica' tion of personnel performing splices.
17. Threading of reinforcing steel and installation of mechanical splices.
18. Drilling in "Q" structures for the installation of anchor bolts, rock anchors and dewatering wells.
19. Installation and inspection of anchor bolts and rock anchors.
20. Compressible material configuration and installation.
21. Testing of reinforcing steel and mechanical splices.
22. Installation, inspection and testing of structural concrete, lean concrete, grcut and drypack.
23. Repair of concrete in "Q" structures.
24. Calibrating, maintaining, installing and controlling of hydraulic jacks and pressure gages.
25. Load transfer activities.

I

26. Backfilling and acceptance testing for access shafts and i

tunnels in "Q" areas.

l L

t

Precedures To Be Submitted By The Subcentractor Org:nizatica Racp;nsible For Preccdure RIview & Approvsl 8

= u E 15 4 ES 18 T&o 44

, 33 2% %dt Q 22 8

A 8

Md 88 "38 ME Hu 8 mu$$6u Procedure for general underpinning - This procedure X 0 0 X X 0 shall include the overall concept of the work involved, including the interface of all the

  • operations listed below.

Procedure for load transf er. X 0 0 X X 0 Procedure for placement of lean concrete backfill in X 0 X X shafts and tunnel.

Procedure for installation of (including mixing) X 0 X X and pressure grouting.

  • Procedure for placement of pier concrete. X 0 X X Procedure for acquiring and maintaining calibration X 0 X X of Jacks and gages.

.. ~

Procedure for mechanical spticing of reinforcement- X 0 X X Procedure for threading of reinforcing steel. X 0 X X Procedure for installation of anchor bolts and rock X 'O 'i X anchors. LEGEND Procedure for installation of compressible material. X 0 X X REVIEW & APPROVAL - X Procedure for placing reinforcement includirig X 0 X X REVIEW & cot 92ENT - O bending steel reinforcement (hot and cold). as applicable Procedure for core drilling. X 0 X X l

l ENCLOSURE 3 EXHIBIT A Page 1 OF 2

Procedurco To Be Submitted By The Subcontractor Orgtnizztica Raspensible For Procedure Rsview & Approvel 8 -

en u $

S Et TE T &T dd o

33 eo ocoogaRnb Q cr A8 oa M $$ EOME60 $ $0 Procedure for concrete repairs. X 0 X X Procedure for excavation "Q" structures and the X 0 0 X X ,

installation of lagging.

Procedure for protection of underground utilities X 0 X X .

Procedure for preparing, submitting, and revising X 0 X X Q procedures.

Procedure for handling, storing, and controlling X 0 X X Contractor-furnished materials.

Procedure for design document control. X 0 0 X Procedures for interface and coordination X 0 0 0 X between the. Subcontractor _ and the Contractor for activities covered by the QA Program.

Procedure for construction of temporary supports including grillage. X 0 X X 0 Procedure for welding. X 0 X X LEGEND Procedure for ceritifying subcontractor personnel X 0 X X REVIEW & APPROVAL - X specifically for AWS welding and mechanical splices.

REVIEW & COMMENT - O Procedure for Training Program of subcontractor X 0 X X as applicable personnel for the Q-Procedures covering the subcontractor scope of work.

ENCLOSURE 3

! EXHIBIT A Page 2 0F 2

PROCEDUZE REVIEWlAPPROVAL FLOWCHA7.T EnlCIDSURE 3 EXHISITS ,

SECHTEL FIELD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DOCUGAENT PROJECT SUSCONTRACTOR ENGINEERING

  • INTERFAcaNG REMEDML SOILS CONTROL ADeNNISTRATION EDPI 4.25.1 GROUPS
  • GROUP FID t.100 EDP 5.18 EDP E.18 ORIGINATEleUSMIT DRAWINGS

% RECEIVES hw LOGS INISTAMPSA DISTRIGUTES AS -=

LOGS INISTAMPSI OtSTRISUTES As "* REVIEW AND COORDINATION

"

  • REVIEW Alec COttesENT SAPQA PROCEDURES SPECIFIED SPECIFIED and OC appreset I .

RESOLVEl

  • INCORPORATE COtAMENTS ASStGN APPROVAL STATUS REVISE AND NOTIFY SfC TO w y LOG OUT I_ NO STATUS RESUBMIT
  • " NEVISE AND hM LOG OUT '
1. 2. 3 .

RESUBMIT BEFORE USE YES -

STATUS 31 WORK MAY CONSTRUCTION PROCEED. REVISE

% LOG OUT hM LOG OUT ':'

ACTIVITY PROCEEDS

[" AS INDICATED STATUS 2fwCRK MAY .As designated la enhRdl A

- PROCEED. SUSMIT arm FINAL DOCUMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PROCEEUS

  • STATUS tlWORK MAY PROCEED ""

o meen e

I MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION

//

G. Lear 9

Docket File 50 - 3 2 9 0 ^, o c rqECHfygg NRC/PDR S. Pawlicki 0; Local PDR V. Benaroya 2 $

TIC /NSIC/ TERA Z. Rosztoczy i ,gggO 87982 h -

LB #4 r/f W. Haass 6 '

H. Denton D. Muller rec E. Case R. Ballard ca D. Eisenhut W. Regan #

N

  • R. Purple R. Mattson B. J. Youngblood P. Check A. Schwencer 0. Parr F. Miraglia F. Rosa J. Miller W. Butler G. Lainas W. Kreger R. Vollmer R. Houston J. P. Knight W. Gammill R. Bosnak L. Rubenstein F. Schauer T. Speis R. E. Jackson W. Johnston Attorney, 0 ELD S. Hanauer 0IE (3) C. Berlinger ACRS (16) F. Schroeder R. Tedesco D. Skovholt M. Ernst K. Kniel NRC

Participants:

G. Knighton A. Thadani D. Hood D. Tondi E. Adensam J. Kramer R. Landsman D. Vassallo J. Gilray P. Collins R. Cook D. Ziemann J. Kane F. Congel F. Rinaldi J. Stolz M. Srinivasan R. Baer bcc: Applicant & Service List E. Adensam Project Manager D. Hood uicensing Assistant M. Duncan

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20052A751&oldid=2543667"