ML20023D528
| ML20023D528 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/02/1983 |
| From: | Beck J, Lemon C, Levin H TERA CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20023D504 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8305200575 | |
| Download: ML20023D528 (264) | |
Text
PROJECT GUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN FOR MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFICATION PROGRAM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY PROJECT 3101 Prepared by: -
.. w I ;~ Verified by: 4/ "
o)
% Howard A. Levin Charles E. Lemon Project Mcnager Project Quality Assurance Engineer TERA Corporation TERA Corporation s
Approved byr[, v_ t y Approved by: N Jbn W. Beck Robert W. Felton Principal-in-Chcrge Executive Vice President Vice President TERA Corporation TERA Corporation Copy No. d/I May 2,1983 Revision: 3 O
B305200575 830518 PDR ADOCK 05000329 A PDR 7 - - . - _ _ _ _ - -
TERA CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Midland IDCV Program PQAP DOCUMENT REVISION RECORD REV DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES Changes made reflect omission of required graphics - no substantive 1 1/17/83 changes in content. Affected pages: PQAP - pg. 19; Pl Document Control Cover Sheet - pg. 3; Pl - Engineering Eval. Prep. and Control - pg. 3 Pages 12a, 13, 14a: designation of personnel who may potentially 2 2/15/83 participate in the project and thei r functional areas of expertise.
4 Appendix A, ECP-5.2, and 5.2QA, " Calculation Preparation and l
Control" and " Audit Checklist...", updated to include corporate
(* revision.
attachments.
Includes reformatting, further detail and additional Appendix C, Resumes: addition of resumes for personne'. who may potentially participate in the project.
General Revision: Major areas of change include Personnel 3 5/2/83 Qualifications and improvements to Administrative Control and Procedures. General clarification is found throughout.
l i
1 O
l TERA CORDORATION
TERA CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Midland independent Design and C"') Construction Verification Program DATE: 5/2/83 REV: 3 PAGE REVISION RECORD PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV Cover 3 25 3 p. 5 3 p. 9 3 p. 3 3 i 26 p. 6 p. 10 p. 4 11 27 p. 7 p. Il p. 5 111 28 p. 8 p. 12 o. 6 Iv 29 Att. A $$ *-kl p. 7 1 Fig. 1 Att. 8 Att. A p. 8 2 Att. A Att. C Att. B p. 9 3 Att. B PI-3201- 001QA Att. C Att. 1 4 Att. C p. 1 Att.D-1 Att. 2 5 .
Att. D o. 2 Att.D-2 Apo. C V 6 Att. E p. 3 Att.D-3 l 7 Att. F PI-3201 002 Att.D-4 8 Att. G p. 1 Att.D-5 9 Att. H p. 2 Att.D-6 -
10 Att. I p. 3 Att. E 11 App. A p. 4 P I -3201 -')10 12 l ECP 5.2 Att. A p. I 13 l ECP 5.20A Att.B-1 p. 2 14 l ECP 5.3 , Att.B-2 p. 3 15 l ECP5.3Qk Att.B-3 p. 4 16 ECP 5.5 PI-3201 -008 p. 5 17 ECP 5.6 p. I p. 6 l
18 ECP 5.15 p. 2 p. 7 19 App. B p. 3 Att. A 20 Pl3201-0 )1 p. 4 Att. B 21 p. I p. 5 Att. C 22 p. 2 p. 6 PI-3201- )12 23 p. 3 o. 7 o. I d 24 \/ , p. 4 V p. 8 y p. 2 V l
TERA CORPORATION
)
POLICY STATEMENT in conjunction with the corporate Quality Assurance Program, this Project Guolity Assurance Plan has been prepared to establish the measures necessary to provide adequate confidence in and assurance of the quality of services to be
- provided for Consumers Power Company in the performance of activities involved in the conduct of the Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Program. To that end, the quality assurance / quality control methods, procedures, and instructions established herein shall be implemented, os applicable, by those individuals assigned responsibility for the activities requiring quality assurance and control as identified herein. Any deviations, exceptions, or other nonconformances shall be brought to my attention for resolution.
s l
(/ !% -f :'~
Howard A. Levin Project Manager O Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Program
(
l O
TERA CORPORATION
i TABLE OF CONTENTS O
SECTION PAGE 1
i POLICY STATEMENT I TABLE OF CONTENTS 11
- 1. GENERAL I l 1.1 Purpose I l.2 Scope ., i 1.2.1 Engineering Evaluations I l.2.2 Document and Report Preparation 2 1.2.3 Calculations, Analysis and Computer Analyses 3 1.2.4 Source / Reference Material 3 1.3 Implementation 4 i
- 2. ORGANIZATION 4 l
2.1 Project Organization 4 2.2 Authority and Responsibility 5 l 3. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTROL 8 3.1 Management Personnel 8
! 3.2 Project Personnel 12 3.3 Associates 15
- 4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL 19 l 4.1 Subject File 19 l
4.2 Engineering Evoluotions 20
- 4.3 Documents and Reports 21 l 4.4 Calculations, Analyses, Computer Analyses 21 4.5 PGAP 21 4.6 Quality Asurance Documents 21 1
Rev.O ii i
I 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
SECTION PAGE 4.7 Personnel Qualifications 22 4.8 Correspondence File 22 4.9 Potential Open, Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding i Resolution Reports 23 4.10 Engineering Program Picn 24 4 .11 External Communications 24 4.12 Source Documents 24 4.13 Scope Change Requests 25
- 5. PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS 25
~
5.1 Engineering Control Procedures 25 5.2 Project instructions 26
- 6. QUALITY ASSURANCE 29 6.1 Records 29 6.2 Corrective A rion 29 6.3 Audits 29 FIGURES FIGURE 1: PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART I
l ATTACHMENTS A. PGAP REGISTER B. CORRESPONDENCE FILE CONTROL C. CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL STAMP O
Rev.O iii e ., . - . - - , , - - , , n,. - -. . -- - , -_, ,, .
l l
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
APPENDICES A. ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURES ECP-5.2 " Calculation Preparation and Control" ECP-5.2GA " Audit Checklist for Calculation Preparation and Control" ECP-5.3 " Drawing Preparation and Control" ECP-5.30A " Audit Checklist for Drawing Preparation and Control" ECP-5.5 " Project GA Plan Preparation and Control" ECP-5.6 " Quality Assurance Audits" ECP-5.15 " Corrective Action Procedure"
- 8. PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS PI-3201-001 " Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control" p PI-3201-00 LOA " Audit Checklist for Engineering Evaluation Prepcration V and Control"
! PI-3201-002 " Document Control Cover Sheet" PI-3201-0020A " Audit Checklist for Document Control Cover Sheet" PI-3201-005 " Documentation of Observations" PI-3201-006 "Use of Design Verification Checklists" (to be issued at a later date)
PI-3201-007 "Use of Construction Verification Checklists" (to be issued at a later date)
PI-3201-008 " Preparation of Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports" PI-3201-009 " Engineering Program Plan" l
l PI-3201-010 " External Communications, Protocol and the Preparation of Contact Log Sheets" PI-3201-012 " Scope Change Requests, Midland IDCV" C. RESUMES Rev.3 iv
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE I of 29
- 1. GENERAL 1.1 Purpose The Project Quality Assurance Plan (PGAP) establishes, describes, and defines the documented, auditable, control measures to be imple-mented to ensure accurate engineering evaluations, correct calcula-tional procedure and analysis, and correct data opplication for the Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Program (IDCV) for Consumers Power Company (CPC).
l 1.2 Scope '
l l Quality Assurance (QA) requirements shall be opplied to engineering I
design and construction evaluations, analyses, computer analyses, calculation preparation, documentation cnd the development of i
findings and final reports. The specific activities to which the PGAP opplies and the method of program application are as follows.
1.2.1 Engineering Evaluations Engineering evoluotions are the principal means of documenting the IDCV review process and the bases for its conclusions. Engineering evoluotions required for project review activities associated with design and construction verification shall be controlled by Project Instruction PI-3201-001. They shall be performed by technically
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN O)
( PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 2 og 29 qualified individuals, and will be reviewed by an individual having qualifications at least sufficient to perform the evaluation. Where calculations are required to be performed to support the engineering evaluation, these shall be controlled in accordance with Section 1.2.3.
Engineering evaluations shall be maintained in files at the Bethesda, Maryland offices of TERA for the duration of the project.
1.2.2 Document and Report Preparation O
NJ Documents such as Monthly Status Reports, Draft and Final Interim Technical Reports, Draft and Final Reports that are prepared in the course of this project shall be controlled in accordance with Project Instruction PI-3201-002 through the use of Document Control Cover Sheets. Documents such as Open, Confirmed and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports that are prepared in the course of the project shall be controlled in accordance with Project instruction PI-3201-008. These documents shall l be prepared by technically qualified individuals and shall be reviewed by another individual familiar with the project.
This review may be performed by the Project Manager.
l f%
G
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN .
PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 3 of 29 Documents and reports prepared during this project shall be maintained in files at the Bethesda, Maryland offices of TERA for the duration of the project.
l.2.3 Calculations, Analyses and Computer Analyses (1) Final calculations, analyses and computer analyses that are performed for purposes of confirmatory evaluation of the Midland design or design bases shall be prepared and controlled in accordance with ECP-5.2, " Calculation Pre-paration and Control."
(2) Calculations shall be controlled through the use of calcu-lation cover sheets as described in ECP-5.2.
(3) Final calculations shall be kept at the Bethesda, Maryland offices of TERA for the duration of the project.
l.2.4 Source / Reference Material l Source or reference material obtained from Consumers Power Company or other organizations used in performing the engineering evaluations, calculations, analyses, computer l analyses or document preparation for this project shall be maintained in a file at the Bethesda, Maryland offices of TERA for the duration of the project. Control of this material shall be provided by use of file registers that list the l
O l
1 i
- J
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN M- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 4 of 24 information contained in that file, including date or revision.
Source material for which TERA is on a revision distribution list, such as drawings and specifications, shall be controlled by use of registers which tog the distribution of copies, or originals, of these documents.
l.3 Implementation 1.3.1 This Project Quality Assurance Picn is to be implemented, os cpplicable, by all individuals assigned responsibility for per-formance of technical, managerial, and administrative func-
) tions related to the quality assured activities identified previously.
l.3.2 Revisions are effective and shall be implemented within ten (10) working days of the date of issue of the revision. All activities are to be in compliance accordingly.
- 2. ORGANIZATION 2.1 Project Organization Figure I provides the organizational chart for the project. Technical and cdministrative personnel (not shown) will receive assignments directly from the Project Manager (PM). The Project Mcnager will serve as the principal point of contact with Consumers Power O .
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN O ec^e- 320i eao;ECt censemer, ec er cem .nv Midland Independent Design and REW 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction Verification Program PAGE 5 of 29 Company. The Project Quality Assurance Engineers will report directly to the Executive Vice President. They will identify internal quality assurance deficiencies, work with the Project Manager in providing clarification relative to identified deficiencies and any recommendations made by them for resolution.
2.2 Authority cnd Responsibility 2.2.1 The Principol-in-Charge (PIC) is responsible for helping establish the general philosophy of review, setting forth guidcnce to the Project Manager and the Lead Technical b Reviewers (LTR), ossisting as on interface with the Senior Review Team (SRT) Chairman, NRC and Consumers Power Company and reviewing / concurring in reports issued to Consumers Power Compcny, NRC cnd other outside parties.
1 2.2.2 The Project Manager is responsible for overall plcnning and supervision of all in-house activities undertaken as required to fulfill the contract requirements. All documentation, correspondence, reports, calculations, etc., issued to Consumers Power Compcny, NRC cnd other outside parties ore to be issued under his signature or otherwise receive his l
approval as required by the applicable Engineering Control Procedure or Project instruction. The Project Manager is also responsible for overcil planning and management of all f outside activities performed by Associates and any subcontractors, but may delegate responsibility fcr t
O
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN O ec^e- 320i eRoseCr: censemers re e, cemo.nv Midland independent Design and i REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction Verification Program eAGE 6 of 29 supervision to other individuals within the project.
Documentation may be issued to the associate or subcontractor under the signature of the designated individual.
2.2.3 The Chairman of the Senior Review Team (SRT) is responsible for the coordination and direction of SRT cetivities. He shall serve as an interface with the Project Manager (PM) to ensure resolution of SRT comments on Open, Confirmed and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports before transmittal O to the eriecinei-in-Cherse ceiC) for ennrevei. 18e SRT Chairman will document recommendations cnd comments crising from SRT review meetings to the PIC with copies to the PM cnd Lead Technical Reviewers.
2.2.4 The Senior Review Team (SRT) is responsible for the review of Open, Confirmed and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports as requested by the Principal-in-Charge (PIC), Findings and proposed Action Plans for resolution of Findings, as well as all Interim Technical Reports cnd Final Reports prior to issuance. They will also provide recommendations to resolve l differing technical views which may crise among project team members. The SRT may at any time recommend to the PIC that the Project Manager expand the scope of review, provide clarification or reassess elements of the review. The SRT is also responsible for the review of monthly status P
d
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
/7 Consumers Power Company V N- 3201 PROJECT:
Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction verification Program PAGE 7 of 29 reports, OCRs, as directed by the SRT Chairman, and any Draft Interim Technical Reports to maintain current technical awcreness and assure a high level of technical quality.
2.2.5 The Lead. Technical Reviewers (LTR) are responsible for management and implementation of all review activities within their discipline of review, including supervision of individuals on the project team and outside activities per-formed by Associates or subcontractors. The LTRs report to the Project Manager. The LTRs are responsible for the O ieitici ciessificetion of O C R s en d riediess, t8e gre ncration of
( rinding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports.
2.2.6 The Project Quality Assurance Engineer is responsible for verification of the implementation of the PGAP and will perform cudits of applicable procedures and instructions implementation in cecordance with Section 6.3 and ECP-5.6.
2.2.7 Lines of communication for identified deficiencies shall be in accordonce with ECP 5.15, " Correct ve Action Procedure."
I
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction verification Progran PAGE 8 of 29
- 3. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTROL 3.1 Management Personnel 3.1.1 Principal-in-Charge - John W. Beck Mr. Beck has broad experience in operations, systems, engi-neering, environmental, and licensing areas of the nuclear power industry and has been selected by the Executive Vice President to provide corporate overview of the project. He is an officer of TERA Corporation. A copy of his resume is
() presented in Appendix C and provides documentary evidence of his qualifications.
3.1.2 Project Mancoer - Howard A. Levin Mr. Levin has broad experience in the areas of nuclear plant engineering and licensing as well as managing engineering projects. He has been selected by the Executive Vice President as Project Manager to mcnage and direct the implementation of the project. A copy of his resume is presented in Appendix C and provides documentary evidence of his qualifications.
1 O
l 0
l l
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction verification Program PAGE 9 of 29
\
3.l.3 Project Quality Assurance Engineer - Charles E. Lemon, P.E.
Mr. Lemon has broad experience and is highly qualified in the crea of nuclear power plant quality asarance and has been selected by the Executive Vice President as Project Quality Assurance Engineer for the project. Mark Polit will serve os Assistant Quality Assurance Engineer. Resumes for these individuals are presented in Appedix C and provide documentary evidence of their qualifications.
3.1.4 Lead Technical Reviewers O
The Lead Technical Reviewers (LTR) have been selected based upon their unique technical and management qualifica-tions for the project. The following lists the LTRs along with a short description of their creas of expertise. Copies of their resumes are presented in Appendix C, providing docu-mentary evidence of their qualifications.
Lead Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Joseph Martore Nuclear power plant structural, Structural Review mechanical design and construc-tion, equipment qualification, operating recctor safety, licens-ing, project monogement Frank Dougherty Nuclear power plant mechanical Mechanical Review design, safety and reliability analysis, system design / criteria development O
v I l
l
i PROJECT QUAllTY ASSURANCE PLAN O
PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 10 og 29 Lead Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Richard Snaider Nuclear power plant operations, Systems Review maintenance and design, systems engineering, licensing project management, mechonical engineering Lionel Bates Nuclear power plant electrical, Electrical Review instrumentation and control systems design, equipment quali-fication, plant operations and maintenance Donald Tulodieski Project management / control, Construction Verification start-up testing, engineering analysis and design, licensing, plant reliability analysis Martin Jones Nuclear power plant construction Site Activities management, quality control, training, start-up, electrical engineering 3.l.5 Senior Review Team The Senior Review Team (SRT) has been selected by the Principal-in-Charge based upon their many years of experience in the nuclear industry, broad creas of personal l knowledge, and specific nuclear design review expertise. The following lists the SRT members along with a short description of their areas of expertise. Copies of their resumes cre presented in Appendix C providing documentory i evidence of their qualifications.
1
l PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN PGAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Ccmpany Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE I1 of 29 SRT Member Functional Areas of Expertise l
! Donald Davis Nuclear safety and licensing, plant and reactor systems, thermal-hydraulic analysis, accident analysis William J. Hall Engineering analysis and design, structural engineering, struc-tural mechanics and dynamics, soil mechanics, fracture mechanics, engineering criteria development for major projects Robert Wilson Nuclear power plant operations, engineering and design, licensing project management 3.1.6 Senior Review Team Chairman - Donald Davis i
Mr. Davis has extensive experience in nuclear plant engineering and licensing and has been selected by the Principal-in-Charge for the project. He will coordinate and direct Senior Review Tecm activities.
1 1
3.1.7 LTRs are controlled and their performance evolucted under direct supervision of the Project Manager who provides input l to the Principal-in-Chorge for his review and concurrence.
l 3.1.8 Management control is provided by the Executive Vice Presi-dent, Robert W. Felton and Vice President, Lcrry H. Wight, I
through review of project reportr, audit findings, and evaluations conducted in the normal course of business. Mr.
Felton and Mr. Wight have extensive experience in the management of large-scale projects involving engineering
- criteria, licensing cnd quality assurance. Their resumes are provided in Appendix C.
l t
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction verification Program PAGE 12 of 29 3.2 Project Personnel 3.2.1 Staff technical and administrative personnel are selected by the Project Manager or LTR; as required, based on their qualifications and creas of expertise, to perform and/or coordinate the performance of activities undertaken in ful-fillment of contract requirements.
3.2.2 The following lists the various TERA technical personnel that may participate in this project and the functional areas where each will provide input to the project. This listing
( shall in no way restrict the personnel used by TERA to complete this project. The Project Manager or LTRs may assign personnel in addition to those listed below; however, these other personnel must have qualifications that are adequate to the extent required for performing the specific task.
Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Robert Cudlin Nuclear safety ar5d licensing, reactor safeguards, plant and containment systems, equipment qualification f
Henry George Quality assurance, training, r'uclear plant systems procedures, project management i
m
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN V PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction verification Program PAGE 13 of 29 Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Robert Snyder Nuclecr power plant design and construction, project manage-ment, start-up and operations Michael Aycock Nuclear power plant systems, operating procedures, licensing and project management Christian Mortgot Engineering mechanics, earthquake engineering Jorma Arros Engineering mechanics Kenneth Campbell Soil mechanics, ecrthquake engineering Norman Berube Design cnd analysis of mechanical systems, thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, engineering, analyses l Frederick Berthrong Engineering project management, i
planning, scheduling and field engineering Leonard Stout Design, construction, start-up and operations project control, schedule and cost control systems l
l Susan Sly Burke Civil / mechanical design and construction, installation and inspection 1
l l
[^\
O l
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REW 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE I4 of 29 Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise l Richard MacDonald Engineering, construction, opera-tion, maintenance and project management systems, nuclear plant start-up and operations Sidney Brown Engineering and construction management, cost and scheduling, quality control, field engineering Douglas Witt Nuclear power plant systems and mechanical design, safety analysis, equipment design, licensing, HELBA, thermal-hydraulics O semax cieicea eewer niemt mecaemiceiaesis".
piping / hanger design and con-struction, review and inspec-tion of mechanical systems, construction supervision and management, results engineering James Long Engineering management, nuclear power plant safety and licensing l George Trigilio Design and analysis of waste i
treatment systems, health physics, radiological engineering
'I Stephen Schreurs Engineering analysis computational methods, ECCS evaluation, waste management, licensing
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN M- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REW 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction verification Program PAGE 15 of 29 Technical Reviewer Functional Areas of Expertise Forzin Romezonbeigi Structural and mechanical engineering, usage and interpretation of structural / mechanical computer codes l
Christian Nelson Nuclear power plant operations, design, safety analysis, seismic design evaluation, inspec-tion program development 3.2.3 Staff personne! are controlled and their performance evolu-O ated under direct supervision of the LTRs who provide input to the PM for his review and concurrence.
3.3 Associates 3.3.1 Associates are selected by the LTRs and Project Mcnager as required to perform activities requiring specific detailed, state-of-the-art knowledge of selected scientific and engi-neering specialties.
3.3.2 Associates are controlled by direct supervision of the LTRs with assistance as required by other staff personnel.
3.3.3 The following lists the various TERA associate personnel that are expected to participate in this project and the functional O
V
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REW 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 16 of 29 crecs where each will provide input to the project. This listing shall in no way restrict the personnel used by TERA to complete this project. The LTRs or Project Mcnager may assign personnel in addition to those listed below; however, these other personnel must have qualifications that are adequate to the extent required for performing the specific task.
Associate Functional Areas Monte Wise Engineering and project manage-ment, preservice/ inservice
) inspection, NDE, nuclear power u plant operations and management, quality assurance Mehmet Celebi Nuclear power plant structural, mechanical design and construction Sten Fabic Thermal-hydraulic and hydo-elostic analysis, computer methods develepment (authored BLODWN-2, WHAM, GASRAD, MULTIFLEX),
pipe rupture cnolysis, containment enclysis Albert Mortore Engineering, specification, con-struction fabrication, construction management and control, schedul-ing, supervision, inspection G
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN O ec^e- 320i eRo;Ect censemers re er cem .nv Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction Verification Program eAGE 17 of 29 Associate Functional Areas James Owens Nuclear and fossil power plant design and construction, nuc-lear steam supply systems design and construction, pro-ject management, control systems, safeguards, licensing Stanley Kout Design review, construction, testing, operation and licens-ing of electrical power, in-strumentation and control systems and equipment; project
- management, plant procedures development, quality assurance p
d Edward Beck Nondestructive testing, Level 111 in radiography, ultrasonics, magnetic particle, liquid penetrant, materials testing Robert Reneau Nondestructive testing, Level ll in radiography, ultrasonics, magnetic particle, liquid penetrant, materials testing Orin Kilgore Corporate quality assurance, construction, startup and l
operations l
William Pryor Mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation quality inspections, startup, testing and operations i
Frederick Pellerin Development, implementation, monitoring, supervision, and evaluation of quality assurance and quality control programs l
PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction Verification Program PAGE 18 of 29 Associate Functional Areas Stephen Briscombe Construction management, site construction services, con-struction supervision, electrical construction techniques, pro-cedures and specification development, design review, quality control Luis Flores Nuclear power plant licensing, operations, systems engineering, instrumentation and control sys-tems, failure analysis Loren Stanley Nuclear licensing, design review, safety-related component deter-p)
( minations, probabilistic risk assessment Richard Keller Electrical, instrumentation and control systems design, plant protection systems / engineered safety features evoluotion, probabilistic risk assessment Edward Schrull Reactor safety systems, nuclear licensing, reliability and risk assessment, instrumentation and control, computer analyses Peter Andersen Nuclear power plant safety cnd design analysis, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, computer modeling John Angelo Design, operation, maintenance, installation, testing and inspec-tion of power plant systems and l components, nuclear safety and licensing O
l l
l 1
i PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction verification Program PAGE 19 of 29 Associate Functional Areas Joseph Penzien Structural engineering, earth-quake engineering, reinforced concrete response Daniele Veneziano Engineering statistical analysis, probabilistic analysis, civil engineering Lenny Laakso '
Structural / mechanical analysis and design of nuclear pow ~er plant buildings and equipment, specifica-tions, planning and scheduling
- 4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL 4.1 Subject File ,
The following numbers shall be used as subject file identifiers to identify controlled documents in that file. Documents in a file shall have an I.D. number that includes the project identifier and the
( subject file identifier followed by a unique sequence number (001-999).
t File Identifier Subject File 1
3201-001 Engineering Evaluations 3201-002 Documents and Reports 3201-003 Calculations, Analyses, Computer Analyses O
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction Verification Program PAGE 20 of 29
/
File Identifier Subject File 3201-004 PGAP 3201-00S Guality Assurance Documents 3201-006 Personnel Qualificottons*
3201-007 Correspondence File 3201-008 Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports, Finding Resolution Reports 3201-009 Engineering Program Plan O 220i-0i0 Externei Cemmeeicetiees (Contact Log Sheets) 3201-01i Source Documents
- 3201-012 Scope Change Requests 4.2 Engineering Evoluotions Engineering evaluations are controlled in compliance with the reevirements of Pro, lect Instruction PI-3201-001, " Engineering Evol-uation Preparation and Centrol." '
Source documents (file 3201-Oll) and Personnel Qualifications documents (file 3201-006) do not require ID numbers; however, these documents are logged by register in accordance with sections 4.12 and 4.7 respectively, b
a
- r - - .m .wg - -
l PROJECT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PLAN N- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction verification Program PAGE 21 of 29 4.3 Documents and Reports i
Documents and reports such as Monthly Status Reports, Draft Final Reports, Draft Interim Technical Reports, Interim Technical Reports, and Final Reports are controlled in compliance with the requirements of Project Instruction PI-3201-002," Document Control Cover Sheet."
4.4 Calculations, Analyses, Computer Analyses Calculations, Analyses and Computer Analyses are controlled in
- compliance with the requirements of ECP-5.2, Calculation Prepara-C) tion and Control. The Project identifier is the Project No. as listed on the cover sheet previously.
4.5 PGAP The PQAP is controlled in compliance with ECP-5.5, Project GA Plan Preparation and Control. For this project, the PGAP Register, Attachment A, will be maintained by the Project Manager.
4.6 Quality Assurance Documents l
Quality Assurance (QA) Audit Reports, responses, follow-up documents, etc., are controlled in compliance with ECP-5.6, " Quality Assurance Audits." The Project Manager will maintain a register (Attachment B) to log control numbers assigned to QA documentation per ECP-5.6.
O v
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Veri fication Program PAGE 22 of 29 4.7 Personnel Qualifications Documentation related to the qualifications of project personnel such as resumes and offidavits are logged (Attachment C) and filed in subject file 3201-006.
4.8 Correspondenca File Correspondence, including letters and memos, shall be routed to appropriate personnel and indexed in the subject file 3201-007. Each document will be assigned a unique identification number in the O feiiewies fermet:
3201-007-XXX-X h J L JL J L Cc respondence Type Designator Sequence Number (001-999)
Correspondence File identifier Project Number 4.8.1 The following correspondence type designators shall be utilized:
i O
e
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN N- 3201 PROJECT: Consumcrs Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 23 of 29 File Register Correspondence Type Designator CPC to NRC A NRC to CPC B CPC to TERA C NRC to TERA D TERA To CPC and NRC E CPC to Bechtel F Bechtel to CPC G NRC to Bechtel H Bechtel to TERA J CPC to B&W K Project Miscellaneous L Bechtel to/from B&W M Bechtel Internal N Miscellaneous NRC P O Tea ^ to sec8tei cea 8&w o 4.8.2 A register (sample shown in Attachment D) will be maintained for each file. The file control stamp or equivalent (example shown on Attachment E) shall be used to record the identification number assigned to each document.
4.9 Potential Open, Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reoorts, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports Potential Open, Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports are controlled in compliance with the requirements of Project Instruction PI-3201-008; Preparation of Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and l
Finding Resolution Reports."
l O
I
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 24 of 29 4.10 Engineering Program Plan Project Instruction PI-3201-009, " Engineering Program Plan" (EPP) is issued and controlled as a separate document from the Project Quality Assurance Plan (PQAP). The EPP is included as part of Appendix 8. A distribution list for controlled copies of the EPP (Attachment A) shall be maintained by the Project Manager.
Preparation and control of Project Instructions are addressed in Section 5.2.
4.ll External Communications O
Records of telephone conversations, meetings and exchanges of written documents between IDCV project personnel and external parties are controlled in compliance with the requirements of Project Instruction PI-3201-010, " External Communications, Protocol and the Preparation of Contact Log Sheets."
4.12 Source Documents Source 'or reference material obtained from Consumers Power Company or other organizations shall be routed to appropriate personnel after logging. The Document Control Register for Drawings and Specifications (Attachment F) will be used for these two categories. Source documents files except those for externally controlled drawings and specifications, will be controlled using a Document / Report Control Register (Attachment G). A separate file and register will be maintained for various categories of source documents at the discretion of the Project Manager or his designated representative.
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN ;
PROJECT: Consumers Power Company V'O N- 3201 Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 25 of 29 4.i3 Scope Change Requests Scope Change Requests are controlled in compliance with the requirements of Project Instruction PI-3201-012, " Scope Change Requests, Midland IDCV Program." The Project Manager shall maintain a register (Attachment H) for Project File 3201-012.
- 5. PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS 5.1 Engineering Control Procedures 5.1.1 Engineering Control Procedures (ECP) and revisions are implemented at project level by issue of the POAP or by revision thereof. ECPs are corporate level documents prepared under the supervision of the Quality Assurance Manager and approved by the Executive Vice President.
t 5.l.2 The following ECP's are hereby implemented for the subject project:
(1) ECP-5.2, " Calculation Preparation and Control", Rev. 3 (2) ECP-5.2OA, " Audit Checklist for Calculation Preparation and Control," Rev. 2 (3) ECP-5.3, " Drawing Preparation and Control," Rev. I
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN o PROJECT: Consumers Power Company
() PQAP- 3201 Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction verification Program PAGE % of 79 (4) ECP-5.5, " Project GA Plan Prepcration and Control", Rev. 3 l
! (5) ECP-5.6, " Quality Assurance Audits", Rev. 3 (6) ECP-5.15, " Corrective Action Procedure", Rev. O A copy of the implemented revision for each applicable ECP is attached, Appendix A.
5.2 Project instructions i
O s.2.i eeroese Project instructions cre prepared by the Project Manager or under his direction by a designated individuct for the control of special activities not covered by any of the standard ECPs, or to clarify, expand, or otherwise supplement the standard l procedures to provide more oppropriate control for a specific 1
l activity.
l 5.2.3 Format Project Instructions are prepared on standard header paper (Attachment I) and shall state the purpose and general applicability of the instruction and method of implementation.
The originator signs the " prepared by" block of the header on each page of the instruction.
t
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction Verification Program PAGE 27 of 29 5.2.4 Verification and Approval (I) Project Instructions not related to an implemented ECP require the review and approval of the Project Manager or Principal-in-Charge.
(2) Project Instructions related to an implemented ECP are reviewed by the PQAE prior to issue. This review is noted by the PQAE's initials in the " Approved By:" block of the form.
O s.2.5o - eetCe-o Project Instructions are controlled by assignment of a sequence l
l identification number in the following format:
PI-3201-XXX h h h Sequence number (001-999)
Project No.
Project instruction 5.2.6 Project Instructions The following Project instructions are hereby implemented for this project.
O
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PQAP- 3201 PROJECT: Consumers Power Company Midland independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 26 of 29 (1) PI-3201-001, " Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control", Rev. 2 (2) PI-3201-00lGA, " Audit Checklist for Engineering Evalua-tion Preparation and Control", Rev.1 (3) PI-3201-002, " Document Control Cover Sheet", Rev. 2 (4) PI-3201-0020A, " Audit Checklist for Document Control Cover Sheet", Rev. I O <s) ei-320i-00s. "Decumenterien ef o8servatiees". Rev. 0 (6) PI-3201-006, "Use of Design Verification Checklists",
Rev.O i
l (7) PI-3201-007, "Use of Construction Verification l
Checklists", Rev. 0 (8) PI-3201-008, " Preparation of Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports", Rev. I (9) PI-3201-009, " Engineering Program Plan", Rev. 2 (10) PI-3201-010, " Externa! Communications: Preparation of Contact Log Sheets", Rev. I
l PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN O
PQAP- 32 01 PROJECT: consumers Power company Midland Independent Design and REV.: 3 DATE: 5/2/83 construction Verification Program l
PAGE 29 of 29 (II) PI-3201-012, " Scope Change Request, Midland IDCV",
Rev.O Copies of the implemented revisions of these project instruc-tions are ottoched in Appendix B with the exception of Project Instructions PI-3201-006 and PI-3201-007 which will be provided at a later date.
- 6. QUALITY ASSURANCE
) 6.1 Records All quality assurance checklists, audit reports and records document-ing activities related to the Quality Assured Activities of Section 1.2 herein are retained and controlled as specified herein and in accord-once with the pertinent requirements of the applicable Engineering Control Procedure and Project instructions.
6.2 Corrective Action i
For significant conditions adverse to quality, corrective action taken is documented and resolved in accordance with Engineering Control Procedure ECP-5.15," Corrective Action Procedure."
6.3 Audits Quality assurance au sits of project operations are conducted by the PGAE in accordance with ECP-5.6, " Quality Assurance Audits." For this project, audits shcIl be performed at least every 90 days of active project work.
P NUCLEAR REGULATORY CONSUMERS POWER
( COMMISSION COMPANY I I l l i I i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .a i
1 SENIOR REVIEW TEAM
---' gkojo F S PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Donald Davis, Chrm.
'"*" gyggE A N John Beck William Hall or n o;Ec n Robei + Wilson PROJECT QA PROJECT MANAGER Chuck Lemon Howard Levin
!O l
STRUCTURAL REVIEW SYSTEMS REVIEW ELECTRICAL REVIEW Howard Levin, Acting Richard Snaider Lionel Bates l
CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL REVIEW VERIFICATION Frank Dougherty Donald Tulodieski i
i SITE ACTIVITIES Meriin Jones O FIGURE I PROJECT ORGANIZATION MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION
PQAP-3201, Attachment A Rev. 3 TERA CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION LIST CONTROLLED COPIES CONTROL REV. NUMBER
- NO.
RECIPIENT NAME COMPANY O I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 O
Il i l I l
t l
l O .NO1e,O,N ,0x,NO,cA1e5,,,Rev,5,0NNO.SeN1 ,OREc,,,EN, X IN BOX INDICATES REVISION NO. SENT
+ IN BOX INDICATES RECIPIENT IS NO LONCER RECEIVING REVISIONS TERA CORPORATION
e-- .,.---,e
,, , ,.,-,,-,c=--- --- .- -_.---..-,-_4,y,,-m,,_,-v.-,-, . . . ,__, ,~~,-- - - - - - - - - - - - - . _ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
l PQAP-3201, Attachment B Rev. 3 OUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT REGISTER PROJ. NO. ~ 3201 PROJECT- Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV '
PAGE 1 of SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-005 Document Title jubnumber Date of $ssue Rev.No.
Sew N
i O
t I
+ >
s G
O g - ca n n
PQAP-3201, Attachment C Rev. 3 1
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS CONTROL REGISTER i Cv PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT-Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE 1 of SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-006 Document Title Sequen $ ubnumber Date of Issue Rev.No.
l 9 -
l l
l l
l\ >
h TERA CORPORADO
gg-}201,AttachmentC CORRESPOtOENCE FILE O esoa. No. ,20, eno;ECT- coosumers eower compeay 84oiema tocv PAGE 1 of SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-007 Sequence No. Date From To Subject i
l O
l O
PQAP-3201, Attachment E Rev. 3 0
CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL
- 1.D. NO. CC- -
O l
l O
TERA CORPORATION
0
" y.
3%a8 . N nII 3~ '. D<.
(
V R C T D S I
I D _
O d l
n a
d V ' _
i E
M R _
y _
n _
a p
m &
o C
1 r1 D e0 w-o1 .
P0 R 2 T s3 S S r I D
N m. e O sN I
uO T nE .
A CI oL V E
C : F R
I T T FI C C C EE E OB &
P RU P S E S T D D N
A S R G T N S I
D IW A
R O R D V E
R O
F R
E &
T S
I G D E
R L
O R R E
T B N N M
U O OI N C : T D
T E A I P C N TYOL E
M U
C O
D E
L T
I T
1 T U N Z E O J F
M U
C O
O D OI N. E J
OG R A P P i ,
l ; al4 ! !!l:ii llIikl , '
- I PQAP-3201, Attachment C , Rev. 3 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER i
r V PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE 1 of SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-011 Document Title Date of !$ sue Rev.No.
Sequen ubn !mber l
l O
1 l
e 9
O l TERA CORPORA 110N
PQAP-3201, Attachment H. Rev. 3 SCOPE CHANGE REQUEST CONTROL REGISTER ,
PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV
{ l PAGE 1 of SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-012 Document Title Date of issue Rev.No.
Seque b ubnumber l
1 o
"U l
l i
l i
I l
(v~)
TERA CORPORATION
PQAP-3201, ATTACHMENT I , Rev ,3 O PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 170' -
SUBJECT:
REV.: DATE:
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
PAGE of O
O
l O
APPENDIX A ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURES O
l O
TERA CCGPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE O
SUBJECT:
5.2 CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 3 DATE: 1/7/83 m /
6 PRE 1 OF PAGE
- l. PURPOSE This procedure sholl be followed in the preparation and control of calculo-tions, when required by the PGAP. Calculations are to be prepored to establish or verify designs, design parameters, design criterio, reduce dato, establish performance and economic parameters, and otherwise provide quantitative information in accordance with accepted analytical and moth-emotical methods,
- 2. PREPARATION n
U 2.1 Each calculation shall be prepnred following accepted engineering practice and shcIl include sufficient sketches, notes and explcnctory information to o!!ow any person not familiar with the work, but technically qualified, to understand it without extensive additional inquiry and research.
1 l
2.2 Calculations shall be complete and orderly and shall include problem statement and input requirements such as assumptions, basic criterio, methodology, dato and references, and applicable codes and stand-l ords. Major equation sources shall be given and the source or derivation of any uncommon equations introduced in the calculation.
2.3 References shall be listed and identified sufficiently to allow easy ,
recovery. Title, author, copyright date, edition, etc., shall be included as necessary identification information.
O B-82-15 5.2- I TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.2 CALCULATION PREPARATICN AND CONTROL REV.: 3 DATE: 1/7/83 -m, A PREP PAGE 2 OF 6 t
2.4 All final calculations shall be made on standard Control Sheets (Attachment A) or on sheets stamped in the lower right corner with the Control Stomp (Attachment B) with all required information completed by the originator. A Calculation Cover Sheet (Attach-ment C) shall also be prepared and ottoched as sheet 0 of each final calculation prior to verification and approval.
2.5 Computer calculations shall be identified by a Calculation Cover Sheet with attachments os necessary to define the calculation being performed, the assumptions and input dato used, basic mothematical models applied and references os appropriate. Computer calculations shall be be controlled by ECP-5.4, when implemented by the PGAP.
O
- 3. VERIFICATION AND APPROVAL 3.1 Status Calculations shall be designated as preliminary until verified by checking and opproved by the Project Manager or his designated representative, or until he determines that such review and opproval are not required. Preliminary calculations not upgraded to final calculation status shall be maintained in a separate file.
3.2 Verification 3.2.1 Each final calculation shall be checked by on individual who has qualifications at least sufficient to originate the calculation. The checker shall not (1) be the originator or O B-82-15 5.2-2 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE ECP- 5.2 CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 3 DATE: 1/7/83 f PREP RE BY: w
. YQ2 PAGE 3 op 6 ,
v the originator's immediate superior, (2) have specified a sin-guiar calculational approach, (3) have ruled out certain considerations, or (4) have established the input for a certain ospect being verified.
3.2.2 The extent of verification required is a function of the importance of the calculation, its complexity, degree of standardization and relation to the state-of-the-art.
Based on these considerations, the input, assumptions, and method of calculation may be reviewed as well as the
, reasonableness of the results. The depth of verification con range from o detailed check of the whole calculation to a limited check of the calculation opproach and on citernative or simplified calculation technique.
i 3.3 Documentation of Verification 3.3.1 To provide a basis for project manager approval and future traceability, the extent and method of verification shall be clearly indicated by such methods as check marks on the original calculation and a description of the verification on the Calculation Cover Sheet or a separate sheet. The checker shall flag all errors. However, only the originat<>r may alter the original calculation. In all cases when the propagation of the error is not corrected in the calculation or later in the design process, the l
originator shall electly discuss its significance either on the cover sheet or on the original calculation.
1 O B-82-15 5.2-3 T, ERA CORPORATION
1 l
l ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE l ECP- 5.2 REV.: 3 DATE: 1/7/83 - A PREP Y:
PAGE 4 OF 6 a 1 3.3.2 in cases where only certain ospects of a calculation were verified either due to the perceived need (Section 3.2) or any limitations in the qualifications of the checker, this shall be stated explicitly on the Calculation Cover Sheet or attachments cs necessary.
3.3.3 After checking, the checker shcIl sign and date the Calcu-lation Cover Sheet and each calculation sheet. Any comments shall be resolved with the originctor prior to signoff.
Q 3.4 Approval The calculation shcIl then be possed to the Project Manager or his designated representative for opproval. The extent and method of verification must be reviewed and determined to be satisfactory prior to signoff. The Manager or his designated representctive will sign only the ccver sheet.
1 l
I r
(
O B-82-15 5.2-4 TERA CORPORATION ,
I j
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE O ECP- 5.2
SUBJECT:
^ " ^ " ^"
REV.: 3 DATE: 1/7/83 m. /
PAGE 5 OF 6 PREPA) L_
- 4. DOCUMENT CONTROL l
- 4.1 Identification After all opprovals have been obtained, the final calculation shall be assigned a control identification number by th( Project Manager or his designated representative in the following format:
XXXX-XX-XXX 0 LSequence number
~
- Subject file identifier O
ereject ieentifier
(
- Project and subject file identifers are established in the PGAP.
The Project Manager or his designee shall insert the control identi-fication number on the cover sheet and each page of the final calculation.
4.2 Retention The final calculation shall be indexed, Attachment D, and filed in the appropriate subject file. Calculations shall not be stored loosely but shall be filed in binders or contained in folders. Distribution shall not be mode unless specific written instructions are issued to the contrary. Filing and distribution of final calculations shall be controlled by the Project Manager or his designated representative.
l Further controls resulting from contractual agreement or project specific needs may be stated in the PGAP.
B-82-15 5.2-5 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE :
SUBJECT; O ECP- 5.2 3 DATE: 1/7/83 CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: ,
PREPA Y PAGE 6 op 6
- 5. REVISIONS 5.1 Revisions to final calculations shall be made, verified, and approved in the some manner as the original calculation.
5.2 Superceded final calculations shall be so identified and transferred to a superceded calculation file. This action shall be noted by com-pleting the " Superceded By" blanks on the Calculation Index for the superceded calculation. Superceded final calculations shall either be identified as such on each page or shall be securely bound with of least the cover page so identified.
1 I O 5.3 Cercurettee Pecweses mex be revised bx iesertine regiecement poses or additional pages with the revision number added to the Control I.D. number on these pages. Appropriate page numbers shall be supplied with subpage numbers used if necessory (e.g., 41 A, AIB or 41.01, 41.02, etc.). The Page Revision Record, Attachment E, must be used to record all removed, replaced or revised pages and shall be attached to the.Colculation Cover Sheet. Superceded pages shall be identified os such and transferred to a separate file.
l I
l 6. QA AUDIT CHECKLIST 6.1 Audits of the implementation of this procedure shall be conducted by the PGAE using Audit Checklist ECP-5.2GA, Rev. 2, Attachment F.
l O- B-82-15 5.2-6 TERA CORPORATION
ECP-5.2, Rev.3, Attachment A SHEET OF SHEETS PREPARED W DATE PROJECT NO.
CONTROL l.D. NO. CHECKED W DATE O
l O
1
(
l ECP-5.2, Rev. 3 Attochment B
( O .
CONTROL STAMP CONT A36 ID NO PREPARED ET CATE VE A :iE: E t /CA'i Pa3E 0:
O l
l l
l l
l I
O TERA CORPORATION ,
l ECP-5.2, Rsv. 3 ATTACHMENT C CALCULATION COVER SHEET S'JBJECT CONT. lO. NO.
~
PROJECT NO. OF SHTS.
SUPERCEDES CALC. NO.
REV.NO. REVISION OR!GINATOR OATE VERIFIED BY OATE APPROVEO BY OATE VERIFICATION i
PURPOSE / INPUT REQUIREMENTS O
SOURCES OF OATA. FORMULAE ANO REFERENCES O
(References may be listed on a separate sheet)
TERA CORPORATION
. i. i ' -
mQ s
.i<." > tt>OIEmZ4
-- - O E
T A
O D V.
E R
D E
D E
E P
U S
E T
A D
X E
D N
I
_ N O
I T
O A L
U .
C E L L T
A I T
C V
E R
O
_ N .
D
_ l O
T N
O C
N>OOa8 ssOZ l l:i !1i , 4 ii<ii! ! ! ! '
iI; I i
ECP-5.2, Rev. 3 Attachmsnt E PAGE REVISION RECORD O CONT. l.D. NO. PREPARED BY DATE REV. DATE CHECKED BY DATE
, SUBJECT PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV PAGE REV l
l O
O TERACORPORATION I
i
ECP-5.2, Rev.3, Attactnent F ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE h,_/
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.2 QA AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 2 DATE: 1/7/83 j 3
PREP PAGE I OF sv y
- 1. PURPOSE This checklist shall be used by the PQAE to verify the implementation of
. ECP-5.2, Calculation Preparation and Control, for those calculations directly related to Quality Assured Activities as identified in the PGAP. It shall not be used for any other categories of calculations or types of activities unless instructions to the contrary are established by the PGAP.
- 2. CHECKLIST 2.1 References?
2.2 Calculation Cover Sheet and each page properly prepared ono identified 2.3 Verification and opproval signatures or initials?
~ 2.4 Control and identification number per PGAP?
2.5 Extent of verification indicated?
2.6 Calculation indexed and filed in loose i leaf binder or contained in folders?
2.7 Revisions processed in some manner os original?
2.8 Superseded calculations identified on index sheet properly identified and filed separately?
pd B-82-15 5.20 A- l TERA CORPORA 710N
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE O ECP- 5.2 QA
SUBJECT:
AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR CA ION PREPARATION REV.: 2 DATE: 1/7/83 AND CONTROL ,, s f PREPA A 3-G Y-PAGE 2 op 3 ,
- ~
.a
- 3. COMMENTS 3.1 Identify calculation (s) used in preporing this checklist, state specific cause of any unsatisfactory ratings, and recommend corrective action, if any.
O 3.2 Prepared by: Date:
O B-82-15 5.2GA-2 TERA CORPORAT10N
l ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.2 QA AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR CALCULATION PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 2 DATE:1/7/83 m . . _A 3 3 E 6p _
PAGE OF m v .a
- 4. FOuLOWUP 4.1 Recommended corrective action of item 3.1 satisfactorily implemented?
4.2 If not, state other action taken to resolve the deficiency, or state rationofe justifying no corrective action taken, and if this item is open or closed.
i O
i l
l 4.3 Prepared by: Date:
O B-82-15 5.20A-3 l
TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUBJECT.
ECP-5.3 DRAWING PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 1 DATE. 7/l/81 l_ 0F 5 I
PAGE
~
{
T.
~
- 1. PURPOSE This procedure shall be followed for the preparation and control of drawings, when required by the PGAP. Drawings are prepared as reqired to graphically and/or pictorially describe physical location, size, geometric configuration, summarize dato or other technical parameters and char-acteristics, and include maps, figures, charts, tables and similar docu-ments.
- 2. PREPARATION 2.1 Each drawing shall be prepared following accepted engineering and m drafting proctice, under the direction of the Project Monoger or his designated representative by the drafting department.
2.2 Eoch drawing shall include a title block which prcvides necessary descriptive information such as drawing title, job number and/or nome, client nome, physical scale, if applicable, legend and other pertinent information as established by the Project Manager for each drawing or drawing type.
I i
1 O 8-8 i-i 28 l
1 h
TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUBJECT.
ECP-5.3 DRAWING PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 1 DATE. 7/l/81 PAGE 2 OF 5
- 3. VERIFICATION AND APPROVAL 3.1 Following completion of initial draf ting and checking by the drafting department, o coordination copy shall be prepared and routed to the originator or Project Manager, and other porties for review. Com-ments shall be resolved and the original revised as required. Addi-tional coordination copies of the revised drawing shall be routed and the process repeated until all comments have been resolved. A record copy shall then be prepared, stamped with the Record Copy stamp, Attachment A, and the stamp signed and dated by the draftsman, originator and Project Monoger. The original shall not be stamped, signed or otherwise used as a record of verification and
- opproval.
l O l 4. DOCUMENT CONTROL l
1 4.1 Identification After all opprovals have been obtained and recorded on the record copy, the drawing shall be assigned a control identification number by the Project Manager or his designated representative in one of the following formats:
- 1. For general project drawings; XXXX-XXX d
bSequence number (001-999) .
Project number (established by PGAP)
C B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.3 DRAWING PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 1 CATE. 7/l/81 PAGE 1 OF 5 PR Y. (
- 2. For figures, tables and similar report related drawings; Figure XX.X.X
" LReport text cross-reference Type, as established by report text (chart, table, graph, etc.)
- 3. For maps and geological drawings developed from maps; Map M f Sequence number (01-99)
O sec8 drewies sheii oiso incieee the de1e of issue, es determined bx the Project Manager. The date shcIl appear directly below the title block, shall ng be identified as "Dated, and shall be in the following format:
X XX XX HT day of month issued month issued Icst digit of year issued example: November 23,1974 = 41123 4.2 Retention The drawing shall be indexed, Attachment B, and the original drawing retained by the draf ting department in suitable metal flat or tube files to prevent domoge and deterioration. The recorded copy shcIl be returned to the Project Manager or his designated representative O fer fiiino in the ennrenriete sv8 ject fiie.
B-81-128 i
TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
q ECP-5.3 REV.: 1 CATE.7/l/81 PAGE a OF 5 PR Y (
~ '
5 The Project Drawing Index sheets, Attachment B, shall be retained by the drafting department in loose leaf binders.
4.3 Distribution Drowing shall be reproduced and distributed as directed by the Project Manager or his designated representative. Distribution shall be for information only and shall be uncontrolled.
- 5. REVISIONS 5.1 Revisions to drawings shall be made os required under direction of the Project Manager, or his designated representative.
O 5.2 Revisions will be reviewed, verified, record copy prepared, indexed, retained and distributed following the some control measures estab-lished for initial issue in the preceding sections.
5.3 Only the date code on the drawing shall be updated and recorded in Project Drawing index under the next sequential revision date num-ber.
l 5.4 Superseded original drawings shall be identified by the drafting l
l department by writing near the title block " Superseded," and trans-ferred to separate storage files. The Project Monoger or his designated representative shall remove superseded or outdated record copies from the subject files, write superseded on the copy, and transfer to a separate superseded record copy file.
B-81-128
, O i
TERACORPORATION
(
I
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.3 DRAWING PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.. l DATE. 7/1/81 5
PR i, <"
PAGE E OF
~ ~
T.
- 6. QA AUDIT CFECKLIST 6.1 Audits of the implementation of this procedure shall be conducted by the PGAE using Audit Checklist ECP-5.3 QA, Attachment C.
O B-8 l-128 TERA CORPORAilON
ECP-5.3 Attachment A Page 1 of 1 O l i
i RECORD COPY OWG NC. REV CATE DRAWN EY APCROVED D A~ E.
CA!GINATEC B).
APFADVED: D A E.
PROJECT Mt. NAGER APPROVEO. DA?1 O
TERACORPORATION t
ECP-5.3 Attachment B s
O e W
k Q 9 8
= n 3
c cu X o W
Q Z
, Z O e a
F- 5 O iE w
3 O
E CL N
9 i
O l %
TERA CORPORATION
ECP-5.3 Attachment C ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.30A (s)
AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR DRAWING REV.: 1 CATE: 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL PAGE I OF 3
- 1. PURPOSE
- This checklist shall be used by the PGAE to verify the implementation of ECP-5.3, Drawing Preparation and Control, for those drawings directly related to Quality Assured Activities os identified in the PGAP. It shall not be used for any other categories of drawings or types of activities unless instructions to the contrary are established by the PGAP.
- 2. CFECKLIST 2.1 Drawing includes a title book with descriptive identifying information?
2.2 Record copy for the drawing signed, dated,
- and filed?
2.3 Drawing properly identified and date code applied?
2.4 Drawing properly indexed and filed in metal file cabinet?
2.5 Revisions to drawings processed some os
! original issue?
2.6 Superseded original drawings properly identified and filed separately?
2.,7 Record copies of superseded drawings properly identified and filed separately?
i l
B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION l
ECP-5.3 Attachment C ,
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP- 5.30A REV.: 1 DATE: 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL PR *- I PAGE 2 OF 3
- 3. COMMENTS 3.1 Identify the drawing (s) used in preparing this enecklist, state specific cause of any unsatisfactory ratings, and recommended corrective action, if any.
O l
l l
I 3.2 Prepored by: Date:
l O s-8i-i28 l
TERA CORPORATION I
ECP-5.3 Attachment C ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
O
~J ECP-5.30A AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR DRAWING PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 1 DATE. 7/1/81 >
FR Y- f PAGE 3 OF 3
- 4. FOLLOWUP 4.1 Recommended corrective action of item 3.1 satisfactorily implemented?
4.2 If not, state other action taken to resolve the deficiency, or stote rationale justifying no corrective action taken, and if this item is open or closed.
l l
O i
l 4.3 Prepored by: Date:
B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
" ' ' ' ~
-Q- -
-w -- ---- - - - --- --- --
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE ECW 5.5 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN REV.: 3 DATE 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL ,
PAGE 1 CF 7 g ,
T.
l.0 GENERAL
. 1.1 PURPOSE l
This Engineering Control Procedure describes and defines the preparation requirements for the Project Ovality Assurance Plan (PGAP). The PGAP is required for any TERA project on which the corporate Quality Assurance Program is implemented, either by cont.act requirement or monogement deci-sion.
l.2 SCOPE s This Engineering Control Procedure (ECP) describes cnd defines the preporation requircments for the Project Quality Assurance Plan (PGAP). The PGAP is I required for any TERA project on which the corporate Quality Assurance Program is implemented, either by contract requirement or monogement deci-sion.
l.3 EXCEPTIONS In the event engineering or scientific creas of endeover are identified which are not odequately covered by existing ECPs with respect to Ovality Assurance and Ovality Control, the Project Manager shall advise corporate management and quality assurance personnel such that special procedures and/or instructions may be prepared to augment standard procedures for the project in question. If this oction is necessary, consideration shall be given by appropriate personnel to the preparation and implementation of such special procedures os corporate ston-dards, if they are deemed applicoble to future projects and the goals of overall corporate quality assurance policy.
O B-8 l-128 V
TERACORPORATION ,
1
\
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE E@- 5.5 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN REV. 3 DATE 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL ,
7 PR Y f PAGE 2 OF
= .
2.0 PQAP PREPARATION AND CONTROL 2.1 PGAP FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS Each PGAP shall follow the organization as defined in the following subsections.
2.1.1 COVER SHEET The first page of each PGAP shall be a cover sheet which contains a heading identifying the document as the Project Quality Assurance Plan for o specific client, project nome and project number. In addition, space shall be provided for signatures of the preparer (Project Manager), the Project Quality Assurance Engineer (PGAE) and the executive management individual to which both porties O report with regard to quality assurance activities specified by the PQAP. The cover sheet shall also contain space for identification of control copies, date of issue, and revision number for the PQAP.
2.1.2 POLICY STATEMENT The Project Monoger shall prepare o Policy Statement serving as a management implementation directive for the PQAP on the project in question. This statement is generally free form, but shall, as a minimum, contain text carrying the general policy - message os indicated by the sompte Policy Statement, Attochment A.
2.1.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Following the Policy Statement each PQAP shall contain a Table of Contents identifying section numbers and page numbers for the contents of the PGAP.
B-81-128 g
TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
(
\
ECP- 5.5 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN REV.: 3 CATE 7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL C
PAGE 1 OF 7
~
x.
Eoch PGAP shall contain, as a minimum, those sections as shown in the sample Table of Contents, Attachment B.
2.1.4 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Following the Toble of Contents, the PGAP shall begin. Each page of the plan shall be prepared on the special header paper shown as Attachment C. The plan number shall correspond to the corporate contract or project designation number with the first revision issue of the document as Rev. O, and all subsequent revisions in increasing sequential numerical order. Each page of the plan shall be numbered sequentially, excluding appendices and attachments which may apply for any given PGAP. These documents shall be numbered as separate entities.
The project title entered on each sheet in the header block space shcIl be consistent for all pages in the PGAP.
l 2.2 PQAP DETAILEO CONTENTS The following subsections describe in greater detail the content requirements for a minimum Project Quality Assurance Plcn.
2.2.1 GEffRAL The first section of the PQAP shall be entitled General, and shall contain a statement of the purpose of the plan and identification of the activities requiring specific quality assurance and quality control functions for the project in question. Each section describing on engineering or scientific function requiring quality control measures shall identify applicable ECPs which are mandatory during that operation to provide odequate quality assurance and quality control.
The octual ECPs to be implemented, os identified in these sections of the PGAP, O 8-8 i-i28 TERA CORPORATION
I ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
' "- 5 5 C) PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PREPARATION AND CONTROL REV.: 3 DATE:7/1/81 >
PAGE 4 OF 7 , _
shall be ottoched as appendices to the plan when issued for a client's review and opproval. In addition, ony quality assurance related creas not covered by l
l existing procedures shall be identified, and special instructions shall be defined l ond implemented as required.
The General section of the PGAP shall also contain required statements regarding implementation of.the PGAP as to schedule, issue of revisions and their effective date, and those individuals responsible for compliance with the plan for the project in question. Identification of individuals may be by nome or function.
2.2.2 ORGANIZATION r
A description of the project organization which identifies individuals, their relative responsibility, and lines of authority and communication shall be 1
described in this section. An Organization Chart shall be prepared and attached to the PGAP to clarify this discussion (see sample Organization Chart, Attach-ment D). The discussion shall center on the authority and responsibility of important project personnel, porticularly the Project Manager and Project Quality Assurance Engineer. In addition, general discussions of corrective actions and communication lines between project personnel, corporate manage-ment and designated client personnel shall be defined. When opplicable, this discussion shall identify any ECPs required to effectively carry out assigned authorities and responsibilities.
O S-8'-'28 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE l 1
SUBJECT:
PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE Pl.AN REV.: 3 DATE.7/1/81 PREPARATION AND CONTROL 5 7 PR y. I PAGE OF
~ '
3 2.2.3 PERSONNEL QUALITIFICATIONS AND CONTROL This section of the POAP shall contain three major subsections os follows:
- 1. Management Personnel
- 2. Project Personnel
- 3. Associate Personnel Each section shall introduce, identify and briefly describe the experience and capabilities of important project personnel. These sections should refer to resumes which are to be attached as appendices to the PGAP to further identify, clarify and document the competence and capability of personnel involved on the j project. It should be emphasized in this section that discussion of personnel is in no way intended to serve os o qualification statement for acceptobility for the project. Technical competence and acceptability of TERA project personnel and associates by the client for the project in question is a contractual issue, and its resolution is concurrent with contract issuance. The information provided in this section is only for the purpose of establishing clearly identified lines of communication and authority between responsible TERA and client personnel.
2.2.4 ADMIN!STRATIVE CONTROL l
l This section of the PGAP shall contain information identifying the procedures and/or instructions which will be implemented to control documentation gener-
! oted on the project which is subject to quality assurance and control measures.
! In most cases, ECPs implemented in previous sections associated with quality assured octivities will contain control procedures for the documents they generate. However, there may be cases in which special instructions are O s-8i-i28 TERA CORPORATION l
l
l l
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE 0 5c'- 5 5 AEV.: 3 CATE.7/1/81 eR0acci ourtIrv assuRANct etin PREPARATION AND CONTR0t pAGE 6 7 PR Y f OF
= .
required, either by client request or project management decision, to cover special document handling situations. These shall be pointed out specifically in the administrative control section. This section shall also identify and introduce any project instruction, numbering identification scheme or other special admin-istrative features required for odequate control of project documents. At the Project Manager's discretion, this section may also contain information regarding subtosk identification within the project for occounting and task scheduling and control functions. Although this information may not be essential from o quality assurance and quality control stondpoint, in some cases it may impact critical work areas, and therefore, may be included in the PGAP.
2.2.5 PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS This section of the PGAP shall specifically identify each Engineering Control
. Procedure colled out in other sections of the PGAP. This identification shall be by procedure number, title and revision. It shall also identify and refer to the appendices of the PGAP which will contain the current revision of applicable ECPs.
l l
This section of the PQAP shall also contain detailed instructions for the l development and implementation of Project Instructions, if required to cugment
- existing procedures. The Project Monoger is ultimately responsible for prepara-tion of any required Project Instructions, and the format and methodology of this issuance shall be coordinated with the client.
2.2.6 OUALITY ASSURANCE This section of the PGAP shall identify the method of implementation of quality assurance functions in a menner specific to the subject project, shall specify 1O e-ei.i28 l
Es l TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUBJECT. j ECP- 5.5 O. REV.; 3 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN PREPARATION AND CONTROL DATE: 7/1/81
- C pAGE 7 Oc 7
[ ,
those quality assurance related records subject to retention and control, and shall define the responsibility for and resolution of corrective octions issued as a result of quality assurance audits. Appropriate ECPs and/or Project Instructions shall be identified and implernented for the quality assurance audit functions, corrective oction function, and record control function, as required.
This section will also present the project audit schedule. The Project Manager and the Project Quality Assurance Engineer are responsible for developing and maintaining the audit schedule. The audits rnay be project-wide or by activity as defined in PQAP.
2.3 PQAP CONTROL O The Project Monoger is responsible for the preparation of the PGAP and shall retain control of any necessary revision of the PGAP opplicable to the project.
The original and each revision of the PGAP shall be verified by the project PGAE prior to issvonce.
The original and each revision of the PGAP shall be approved by the Executive Vice President prior to issvonce.
l
' B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
O Atte.h y.ent A POLICY STATEMENT In conjunction with the corporate Ovality Assurance Program, this Project Quality Assurance Plan has been prepared to establish the measures necessary to provide adequate confidence in and assurance of the quality of services to be provided for the Company in the performance of octivities involved in the conduct of the Project. To that end, the quality assurance / quality control methods, procedures and instructions estab-lished herein shall be implemented, as applicable, by those individuals assigned responsibility for the activities requiring quality assurance and control as identified herein. Any deviations, exceptions, or other non-conformances shall be brought to my attention for resolution.
Project Manager t
i l
lO e.8 i-i28 i
- . _ . . _ . . . _ , . _ - - _ _ , _ . _ . , _ _ , - - _ . . . . . , . . . _ - - _ - . . _ _ _ - _ . - _ . = _ . . , _ _ . , _ _ _ _ , _ _ . -
O Attachment B TABLE OF CONTENTS -
Pace
- 1. GENERAL 1.1 P u rpo se . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l.2 Quality Assured Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l.3 Imp le me n t a t ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 2. ORGANIZATION 2.1 Project Organiza t ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Authority and Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O 3. PERSONtEL QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTROL 3.1 Management Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Projec t Personne l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 A ssoc i a te s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL 4.1 Ca lcu la t ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2 Dr a w ing s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3 PGAP.................................................
4.4 Quality Assurance Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.5 Engineering Control Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.6 Projec t inst ruc t ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 5. PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS 5.1 Engineering Control Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2 Proje ct Inst ruct ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( B-31-128
O Attachment B (cont'd)
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)
Pooe
- 6. QUALITY ASSURANCE 6.1 R ec or d s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2 Correc t ive Act ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.3 Audits.................................................
FIGURES Figure 1: PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART APPENDICES A. ENGitEERING CONTROL PROCEDURES l ECP-5.2 - Calculation Preparation and Control l ECP-5.2GA - Audit Checklist for Calculation Preparation and Control ECP-5.3 - Drawing Preparation and Control ECP-5.30A - Audit Checklist for Drawing Preparation and Contro!
ECP-5.5 - Project GA Plan Preparation and Control ECP-5.6 - Quality Assurance Audits B. RESUMES l
O e-8 i-i28 l
ECP-5.5 Attachment C ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP.
AEV.: DATE:
PREPARED BY. APPROVED BY:
PAGE OF 1
O .
lO TERA CORPORATION
O o o9 -
i v.
1 .
l 4
j i flohert W. Felton Executive 1 Vice Presiderd N
Project Monoger Client g Project Quality p Assurance Engineer _
Project Manager
- d a
O
, I I i
Administrative Tec M.ical and Associate Stof f i Stoff Editorial Support l
l l
l E
, U.
FIGURE I PROICT ORGANIZATlON
l ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS REV.:3 DATE.7/1/81 ,
PAGE 1 OF 4
- 1. PURPOSE l.1 This procedure shall be followed for the performance of Quality Assurance Audits whrn required by the PGAP and in conformance with audit schedules as defined in the PGAP. Quality Assurance Audits are required on those projects which provide o product that relates directly to the design of safety-related structures, systems and components or chorocteristic evoluotions and onclyses which offect these safety-related structures, systems and components. The PGAP establishes quality assured octivities and the opplicability of procedures and instructions to those activities.
l.2 Audits of internal project operations shall be conducted over the duration of the contract to:
(1) Provide objective evidence of compliance with the project requirements os defined by the PGAP.
(2) Determine the ndequacy of the PGAP plan.
l l (3) Verify ap.%entation of recommended corrective action, I
as v4n *M B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUSJECT.
p ECP-5.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS REV.:3 DATE.7/1/81 PAGE 2 OF _ 4 }
~ -
- 2. IMPLEMENTATION 2.1 The PGAE shall schedule, conduct, document, make recommendations and findings, initiate corrective action, and follow-up on Quality Assurance Audits os necessary to verify the implementation of the PGAP as required by the TERA Quality Assurance Program.
- 3. QA AUDIT CHECKLIST 3.1 Audits of the implementation of procedures specified for implementation in the PGAP shall be conducted by the PQAE using Audit Checklists applicable to those procedures. Specifically, Audit Checklists ECP-5.2GA,
" Audit Checklist for Calculation Preparation and Control" and ECP-5.30A, O "A u dit C 8ec kiist for D ra winse re parotio e and C oetroi" ere identified fer use.
l
- 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DOCUMENTATION 4.1 The PGAE shall prepare on Audit Report upon completion of each audit, which shall include all Audit Checklists used during the audit, a summary description of the audit and results, and any audit findings requiring corrective action. Audit Findings shall be recorded using the oppropriate Audit Finding Form (AFF), Attachment A. The report shall be distributed by memorandum for information and necessory corrective action to appro-priate levels of management and the Project Manager, and shall be o controlled document.
Q B-81-128 TERACORPORAT10N
)
l
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.6
{3 DATE;7/1/81 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS REV.:3 PAGE 3 CF 4
~
s.
~
- 5. CORRECTIVE ACTION 5.1 Any and all nonconformcnces, deviations and audit findings and exceptions requiring corrective action shall be resolved through the issuon:e of a Corrective Action Memo (CAM). The CAM shall be prepored by the Project Manager in response to the issvonce of an Audit Finding, and shall be issued to the PGAE for acceptance. After final acceptance, the PGAE shall return a signed copy of the CAM to the Project Manager for record.
Attachment B to this procedure provides a sompte Corrective Action Memo.
- 6. FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS t
O 6i 18e ereject Meeeser er his desioneted represeetetive s8eii ,regere ceeit
! finding responses in the form of CAMS os required and shall submit them to the PGAE for acceptance. Upon completion of all action, on Audit Resolution Report shall be issued by the PGAE which shall include all opplicable CAMS, o summary of corrective actions token and all closed out audit findings. Any follow-up action or cdditional audits to verify audit responses, if required, shall be designated in the Audit Resolution Report and distributed to the Project Manager and appropriate levels of manage-ment for information. The Audit Resolution Report is a controlled document.
B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE ECP-5. 6 SWER REV 3 DATE.7/1/81 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS j PAGE 4 OF 4 PA Y: C
- 7. DOCUMENT CONTROL 7.1 IDENTIFICATION After all resolutions have been obtained, final Audit Reports and Audit Resolu-tion Reports shcil be assigned control identification numbers by the PGAE or his designated representative in the following format:
XXX-XXX-M a a a Sequence number QA file identifier' Project identifier Project and subject and QA file identifiers are established in the PGAP.
7.2 RETENTION The final reports shall be indexed and filed oppropriately in the project Quality Assurance file. Distribution shall not be made unless specific written instruc-l tions are issued to the contrary. All final reports shall be maintained by the PGAE, or his designated representative.
l
(] B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
ATTA:ss(C A
- AUDIT FINDING NO. gg 7 arrtum:ts GROUP AUDITED THOSE CONTACTED JO CFR 50. AP'tCII I CRITritIA ISSUED TO AUDIT FidDING test me urtum:t ecitim wru u uttu:)
O i
DISCUSSION (ust me urtuct sc:T :w. wr s u ustu::
RECOMMENDATION test me urtum:t scitim uns u uz:u:)
AUDITED lt_
g,g itTLt es?! ,91sTttrJrt>
AUDITED 31 mgg TITLE k?!
O appg TITt! SAft TERA CORDORATION
ECP-5.6 ,
ATTA M 4T S l
AUDIT FINDING - CORRICTI'vE ACTION MEMD m:,et:1 I I 1 I
(
- 1. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO RESOLVE AUDIT FINDING
@{71%y[t uttu:;
PREP W : 81 A 120h Tach NY aw pg aw pn ACT10h VERIFIED BY list'E sv W p*1 nw pit i \/
- 2. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE
'$:foU"EN! u ut:u:
i l
1 f
PREP M D St A;110h TAEh BY _
aw pit un ACTION VERIFIEC BY
" * *l mW pn POAE ACCEPTANCE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION O
O Rtso'vrs Auois r #ains O vaecterTAstE O vst As is- *t 7mr pit g TEw:s.ApY ust vNTIL RIs0LUT10h TERA CORPOR AT!ON
i ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.15 ORREME CM REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 1 OF 11
~ .
- l. PURPOSE This Engineering Control Procedure establishes the requirements for corrective action measures and preparation of associated documentation. These corrective action measures are provided to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified, reported and corrected. The procedures for preparing Corrective Action Reports are presented in Section 4.0.
- 2. REFERENCES 2.1 Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Port 50.
2.2 Title 10, Code o' Federal Regulations, Port 21 O
V 3. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1.1 Conditions adverse to quality such as failure, malfunctions, deficien-cies, devictions, defective material and equipment, and nonconform-onces shall be promptly identified and corrected.
3.1.2 in the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the condition shall be determined, corrective action shall be taken to l preclude repetition, and the condition with its determined cause and corrective action shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management.
l 1
B-81-128 TERACORPORATION
1 ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE I ECP-5.15 S2ECT:
CORRECTIVE ACTION REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 'l OF 11
~
x.
3.1.3 Follow-up reviews shall be conducted to verify proper implementa- i tion of corrective actions and to close out the corrective action documentation.
3.2 REPORTABLE DEFICIENCIES 3.2.1 Written procedures shall be established for documenting arid report-ing possible Reportable Deficiencies os defined in References 2.1 and 2.2.
3.2.2 All personnel within TERA who believe that a Reportable Deficiency may exist, shall promptly report the condition to appropriate mon-agement.
3.2.3 The possible Reportable Deficiency shall be evoluoted to determine whether or not it is indeed reportable to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Technical assistance shall be obtained from the engin-eering staff and QA staff as necessary to support the evoluotion.
j 3.2.4 When a condition has been evaluated as being a Reportable Defi-ciency, the Regional Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall be notified within the time frame prescribed in references 2.1 and 2.2.
l 3.2.5 This prompt notification to NRC shall be followed by a written, definitive report, that includes a description of the deficiency, on analysis of the safety implications and the corrective action taken.
Also included shall be sufficient information to permit analysis and l
evolvation of the deficiency and of the corrective oction token to Q B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE
~
"bU ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 3 OF ll _
T.
preclude repetition. If sufficient information is not available for such a definitive report within the time frame prescribed in Ref-erences 2.1 and 2.2, TERA shall submit on interim report to NRC.
This report shcIl contain all available information, together with a statement as to when a complete report is to be issued.
3.3 SPECIFIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS WITHIN TERA 3.3.1 TERA shall establish and implement corrective action procedures consistent with the requirements discussed in this section. The need for corrective action may result from on evoluotion of system and procedural deficiencies, and includes those conditions reportable to the NRC. Needs for corrective action may also crise from the results of audit findings, results of TERA design reviews, reviews of surveillance activities, and reviews of material nonconformance reports. When the need for corrective action is identified, the adverse condition shall be documented on a Corrective Action Report.
Appropriate measures shall be taken to bring the condition to the attention of supervisory or monogement personnel who con take effective oction.
3.3.2 Identified conditions requiring corrective action shall be documented on a Corrective Action Report with a control number.
l l
3.3.3 A control log shall be maintained for Corrective Action Reports.
Control numbers shall be assigned, and Corrective Action Reports i shall be logged, reviewed, and distributed to designated personnel in B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE ECL 7 ECP-5.15 (V REV.:0 CORRECTIVE ACTION DATE: 7/1/81 PAGE a OF 11
~
x.
occordance with the Project Ouclity Assurance Plan. The manage-ment of the organization responsible for specifying and implementing corrective action shall be included in this distribution.
3.3.4 The organization responsible for implementation of corrective action shall be responsible for identifying the cause(s) and for specifying the action (s) necessary to correct identified conditions requiring corree-tive action.
3.3.5 When the specified corrective action offects design considerations, a technical review of the Corrective Action Report shall be made by the organization, or its equivalent, that established the original I design basis. This technical review shall evaluate the existing condition and concur with the identification of the cause(s) for the adverse condition and the corrective action (s) proposed or taken to preclude its repetition.
3.3.6 Once a response is received on the Corrective Action Report, the proposed corrective action shall be evoluoted and the implementation shall be verified. The following activities are required:
- 1. A review of the report and concurrence with the j specified corrective action measures.
- 2. Verification that odequate corrective action has been implemented, then updating the control log.
l l 3. If the corrective action is not acceptable or if it has l not been properly implemented, the responsible Pro-( ject Manager shall be notified. This notification is documented and distributed to the some organiza-tions that received the original corrective action.
] B-81-128 l
TERACORPORATION l
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUBJECL ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE R OF 11 }
~
x.
- 4. Distribution of completed Corrective Action Re-port.
- 4. PROCEDURES 4.1 REPORTING A DEFICIENCY DURING AN AUDIT USING THE CAR I. The individual detect!r.g a deficiency during on audit will initiate correc-tive action by filling out the appropriate spaces on a Corrective Action Report (CAR) Form, Attachment A. He will state on the CAR as a minimum: (1) o description of the requirement which describes what is required in the deficient creo, (2) his observation of the deficient crea which show the creo to be in nonconformance, and (3) his recommendation O for correctins 18e deficieecx. The dete ee t8e CAR rerm regresents the day the CAR was written. The individual detecting the deficiency will then sign the CAR and deliver it to the appropriate Project Quality Assurance Engineer.
- 2. The Project Quality Assurance Engineer shall review the CAR to ensure its opplicability and if satisfied that the deficiency requires corrective action, he will complete the top portion of the form by assigning a CAR number from the CAR Log (Attachment B), o,d complete the top of the form os applicable.
- 3. At the post-oudit conference, the Project Quclity Assurance Engineer will have the Project Manager, or his designated representative, sign the CAR in the " Acknowledged By" space or provide o documented reason for not signing the CAR.
l l
O s-8 i-i28 TERACORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE Ea ECP-5.15 REV.:0 DATE: 7/1/81 PAGE 6 OF 11 _
~
x.
- 4. The CAR will then be included in on Audit Report which will be generated and distributed in accordance with ECP 5.5.
- 5. Response to the CAR from the audited orgonization shall be due os requested by the Audit Report. Normally this shall not exceed thirty (30) days.
4.2 REPORTING A NON-AUDIT DEFICIENCY USING TFE CAR I. The individual detecting a deficiency will initiate corrective action by filling out the appropriate spaces on a CAR Form, Attachmert A. The individual detecting the deficiency will state on the CAR os a minimum:
(1) o description of the requirement which describes what is required in the deficient area, (2) his observation of the deficient crea which shows the creo to be in nonconformance, and (3) his recommendation for correcting the deficiency. The date on the CAR Form represents the day the CAR was written.
- 2. The individual detecting the deficiency shall sign the CAR and ottoch it to o cover letter addressed to the Project Manager responsible for the project on which the deficiency was detected. The cover letter shall state that the
" Acknowledged Gy" space shall be signed by the person receiving the CAR.
- 3. Signing the " Acknowledged By" space only indicates that the responsible Project Manager, or his designated representative, has received the CAR.
If the responsible Project Monoger, or his designated representative, will not sign the CAR, o documented reason for not signing shall be required by corporate monogement.
l t
l O B-8'-'28 b -
TERA CORPORATION
l ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUBJECT.
ECP-5.15 CORRE M E M ON REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 7 OF 11
~ -
s
- 4. The CAR and cover letter shall be delivered to the Project Quality Assurance Engineer (PGAE) for his review.
l 5. The PGAE shcIl review the CAR to ensure its applicability and if satisfied that the deficiency requires corrective action, he or his designate will complete the top portion of the form as applicable, including assigning a CAR number from the CAR Log (Attachment B).
- 6. The cover letter and CAR will be filed in the project file end distributed in accordance with the POAP.
- 7. Response to the CAR from the responsible Project Manager shall be due os requested by the cover letter, normally this shall not exceed thirty (30)
O dexs.
4.3 USE OF CAR LOG (ATTACHMENT B) 4.3.1 CAR NUMBER Each CAR will have a unique number assigned from the CAR Log. This number will be o multidigit identification number consisting of the following:
- 1. The first four digits will indicate the audit number (i.e.,
76-01 would be the first audit in 1976 and 77-12 would be the twelfth audit in 1977). CARS that are issued and that are not the result of an audit will use the designator of double zero following the yecr (i.e.,76-00 or 78-00).
- 2. The last two digits will indicate the CAR number (i.e.,
76-01-07 would indicate the seventh CAR of audit 76-01, and 76-00-15 would indicate the fif teenth CAR written in 1976 which was not written as the result of an audit).
B-81-128 TERA CORPORATION
l I
r-ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUBJECE
] ECP-5.15 REV.0 DATE. 7/1/81 ORREWE MON PAGE A OF 11 _
~ T.
- 3. Each Project Quality Assurance Engineer will be respons-ib~le for entering in the CAR Log, the CAR numbers used during that audit, immediately offer the Audit Report is issued.
- 4. The CAR Log should be maintained in chronological order and CAR numbers should not be entered in the log until after the previous numbered audits' CARS have been entered. Those CARS which have o double zero (00) prefix will be maintained on a separate sheet in the CAR -
Log and the PGAE will be responsible for having them entered in chronological order cs they are issued.
4.3.2 DATE ISSUED This date will correspond to the date of the Audit Report inasmucn as that is the date upon which the company bcses formal notification to the responsible Project Manager or his designoted representative.
4.3.3 ISSUED TO This space on the CAR t.og will be used to denote the Project Manager and Division to which the CAR is issued. Abbreviations are acceptable so long as i they are recognized standard cbbreviations.
l l
4.3.4 RESPONSE DUE BY l
This space will include on estimate of the date by which a response from the audited project is due.
l l O B-8 i-i28 TERA CORPORATICN
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUEJECT:
ECP-5.15 ORREC m E AC M N ;
REV.:0 DATE:7/1/81 PAGE 9 OF 11
~ -
4.3.5 RESPONSE RECEIVED ,
This will be the date upon which the response from tbc cudited project was l
received.
4.3.6 PROPOSED ACTION DUE BY Based upon the response received, a scheduled completion date for proposed corrective action will be established cnd this date will be entered in the space provided.
4.4 CLOSING OUT A CAR
- 1. EVALUATING CAR RESPONSE Once a response is received, the proposed corrective action will be carefully considered by the person designated in 4.1.1 or 4.2.1 obove or their supervisor.
The response will be evoluoted for insuring that the proposed corrective action will be initiated in a timely menner, verifying odequacy of the proposed corrective action, and insuring that the proposed corrective action precludes recurrence of conditions adverse to quality.
- 2. RESPONSE ACCEPTABLE i
l If the person evaluating the CAR response is satisfied, he will signify by signing and dating the CAR in the " TERA QA Concurrence with Proposed Action" space provided. If the corrective oction is scheduled for a later date, that date will be l entered in the CAR Log per 4.3.6 obove.
B-8 l-128 TERA CORPORATION l
I - - --
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEOURE
SUBJECT:
ECP-5.15 CORRECTIVE ACTION REv.:0 DATE:7/1/81 >
PAGE 10 OF 11
~ .
- 3. RESPONSE NOT ACCEPTABLE If the response is not accep*oble, a responsible person, designated in 4.1.1 or 4.2.1 above or their supervisor will draf t a letter to the responsible Project Manager, or his designated representative, stating why their response was inade-quote and what would be acceptable os corrective action. This letter will be issued by the PQAE and referenced in the remarks section of the CAR Log.
Communications will continue in this manner, with the responsible Project Manager, to the level of management deemed appropriate by the PGAE until resolution is reached.
- 4. CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETED 1
If the CAR indicates that the corrective action has been accepted per paragraph 4.4.2, the person designated in paragraph 4.1.1 or 4.2.1 or their supervisor will determine what follow-up action is necessary to verify thct the corrective action
- has been completed. When he is satisfied that the corrective action is accomplished he will sign and date the " Closed By" space provided for close out opproval on the CAR Form and forward the CAR to the PGAE for review.
- 5. FILING Once the PQAE has reviewed a CAR, he or his designee shall be responsib!c for completing the entry in the CAR Leg and ensuring that a copy of the completed CAR is filed in the project files.
l l
O e.ei-i28 TERA CORPORATION
ENGINEERING CONTROL PROCEDURE SUBJ CT.
ECP-5.15 REV.:0 DATE.7/1/81 >
PAGE 11 OF 11 } _
_= .
4.5 REVIEW OF CAR LOG It is the responsibility of each PGAE ond the Quality Assurance Manager (QAM) i os appropriate to ensure through periodic reviews of the CAR Log that timely follow-up oction is being taken on the CAR for which they are responsible. The GAM will review the CAR Log at least quarterly and he will make notes of any CAR which is post due, due, or will be due within a short period of time and he will bring these to the attention of the responsible parties for action.
4.6 OVERDUE RESPONSES AND ACTIONS When it becomes apparent that a Response or Corrective Action hos exceeded its due date os listed on the CAR Log the Project Manager, or his designated representative, responsible for the delay will be cited as being in violation of the Corrective Action System os described by this procedure and a CAR or other oppropriate correspondence should be issued as a result of that violation. The Project Guclity Assurance Engineer or the Quality Assurance Monager, as appropriate, initiates this action as a means of prompting action from the delinquent Project Manager, or his designted representative.
1 B-8 l-128 TERACORPORATION
ECP-5.15 Attachnent A DtN:
PROECT NUMBER:
m ECT TITLE:
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT CLIENT:
DATE:
TO: FROM: CAR NO.
ORGANEATION: TITLE:
DESCRIPTON OF REGUIREMENT5:
GISERVATION:
REPORTED BY: ACKNOWLEDGED 8Y RECOMMENDED ACTION:
l l
I PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION:
l I
I.
SCPEDULED COMPLETION DATE: PROPOSED BY: DATE:
TERA CONCURRENCE WITM PROPOSED ACTION NAME TITLE DATE FOLLOWUP:
I I
l r
j CLOSED BY
^" '
O I REVIEWED:
DATE TERACORPOr[ATION l
l - _ - .L.. _ -.. _
3 m 8* s0 1
bNo,O n3t
" e 0
%){(
f 5
1 4
t E
M M
O C
)
1 tL iS aO t>L C
3 E4 tY l W
310i "1E E C M
- A[
iD ft fv OI Pt G SC EE O tt fl L
]V RA
/ Y O
C ML 9U LD 4
F 0
1 D
E U
S S
I
_ Tg ClE KnM i O>
d Wt R
P lv E D
l l
O -
l 1
i i
APPENDIX 8 PROECT INSTRUCTIONS O
l O
TERA CORPORATION
PROJECT INSTRUCTION p p;_ 3201. 001
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation U Preparation and Control REV.: 2 DATE: 4/21/83 r f 1 8 I APPROVED BY:
PAGE of PREPARED BY:h j./v . -- '
l.0 GENERAL l.1 Purpose .
The purpose of this instruction is to establish the requirements for I
preparation and control of engineering evaluations required for the Midiond independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV)
Program.
l.2 Scope r
( Engineering evaluations are the principal means of documenting the IDCV review process and the bases for conclusions. As a minimum, at least one engineering evoluotion shall be required for ecch topic within the scope of the program. It may be necessary to have several i
supporting engineering evaluations serving as input to the final resolution of a particular topic; however, under these circumstances
(
there shall be one primary engineering evaluation that pulls all of the supporting information together under one umbrella, providing an l overall summary and central location for final topic resolution.
2.0 PREPARATION l Evaluations shall be complete and orderly and shall include sufficient l sketches, notes, and explanctory information to allow any person not familiar with the work, but technically qualified, to understand it without extensive additional inquiry and researchi Collectively, these documents l should be sufficiently detailed so that a qualified engineer who is unassoci-
^^'
ated with the project could write the final report using only these inputs.
1
PROJECT INSTRUCTION pj_ 3201. 001
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation
,/ Preparation and Control REW 2 DATE: 4/21/83 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
PAGE 2 of 8
- / ,' e s
~
Engineering evoluctions are the principal means not only of documenting the bases of our conclusions but of collectively providing the required history necessary to support on auditable review process. Thus, special requirements and guidance are laid forth below for their preparation cnd content.
2.1 Engineering Evoluotion Cover Sheet An Engineering Evaluation Cover Sheet (Attachment A) shall be completed considering the following specific guidance. 'Nhile the title indicates the general subject of the evaluation, the entries for O "grimerx" and "suggerties" end 1egi= eem8er ced titie wiii mere specifically define the evaluation. The block for " purpose" should be used to describe the specific purpose of supporting evaluations. The purpose of primary evaluations is defined in this procedure. The
" contents" checklist is provided for guidance to the originator and as a convenient overview of the contents. These categories are described below.
2.2 Abstrcct l
1 An obstract of one page or less should summarize the evaluation and its major cc .clusions, as well os identify related topics and refer to related OCRs, Findings, and Finding Reports.
2.3 Overview of Review Process All engineering evaluations shall contain on overview of the review process within the scope of the evaluation. This shall include, as
\
l
+
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O Pi_ 201. 001 sus;scr: cos4aeeri#2 eveimet4oo Preparation and Control REV.: 2 DATE: 4/21/83 '
PAGE 3 of 8 PREPARED BY:
KVED,BY: g
~"
a j
applicable, on explanation of the review approach and a chronology of events such as major discussions and meetings, requests for infor-motion, and associated reporting. Supporting evaluations document the disposition of the review process and summarize the history of that process to date. Primary evoluotions document an overall summary of the review process and the history of that process as
- opplicable to final topic resolution.
, 2.4 Bases for Sample Selection
! In view of the fact that the IDCV does not include a 100% review of f the three systems within the project scope, the program must rely i upon sampling. Therefore, sampling selection criteria and imple-mentation is extremely important. It is essential that the bases for sample selection of specific plant components or elements be docu-mented as thoroughly as possible, and include on analysis of the degree to which the selected items meet the sample selection criteria attributes documented in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.2 of the Engineering Program Plan. This may be completed within this section of the engineering evaluation or in separate engineering evoluotions tnat broadly address sompte selection making reference to the primary and supporting evaluations when appropriate.
2.S Sources of Information and References Sources of information and references shall be listed separately using Attachment B o' r a similar format. References shall include, when applicable:
O .
9
\
ec . - -
sr y e-- m+ -- __ c h
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
,o pl_ 3201. 001
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation V Preparation and Control REY.: 2 DATE: 4/21/83 1 ,
~
PAGE 4
of 8 PREPARED BY:
< j7e
/ . APPROVED BY:
u./ ,< ,
.'i
~
o Originating organization or author o Document number and date or revision o . Title o Type of document (specification, drawing, let-ter, etc.)
o Where/how located (from records center, Bechtel engineer 'X', calculation file, etc.)
2.6 Background Data Background data include inputs, assumptions, data, and related engi-neering evaluations, calculations, and computer analyses. Sources of this material and associated references must be identified, as appli-cable.
1 l
2.7 Acceptance Criteria Acceptance criteria, upon which checklists and evaluations are based, shall be explicitly stated. These include design criteria contained in I the FSAR and regulations or the guidance contained in the Standard Review Plan, Regulatory Guides, industry codes and standards.
2.8 Evaluation Each evaluation shall be prepared by performing and documenting a point-by-point comparison of the topic being evaluated using design and construction evaluation checklists as appropriate. These check-l lists shall be developed by the reviewer considering the generic l -
- l. *
\
PROJECT INSTRUCTION pl 3201. 001
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation bq REV.: 2 DATE: 4/21/83 Prep)arationandControl f
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: 7 PAGE 5 of 8 c v//Le~-
U 2.j , 6. <
./
checklists issued for each review scope category, the design criteria
( contained in the FSAR and regulations, or the guidance contained in the Standard Review Plan, Regulatory Guides, industry codes and standards. Each checklist shall be reviewed by the Lead Technical Reviewer 0.TR) before being used by the reviewer. For further discussion of the preparation and use of design and construction verification checklists see PI-3201-006 and PI-3201-001,,1respectively.
Checklists used in the evoluction shall clways be appended thereto.
2.9 Conclusions O Ceeciusiems es weii es the 8cses for conciusions s8eii de summerized.
This shall include, cs applicable:
o Determination of extent and root cause o Assessment of CPC/Bechtel/B&W plans for re-solution o incorporation of SRT recommendations.
3.0 VERIFICATION AND APPROVAL 3.1 Engineering evaluations shall be designated as preliminary until 1
l approved by a Lead Techneial Reviewer, the Project Manager or his designated representative. Preliminary evaluations not upgraded to final status shall be maintained in a separate file for reference purposes by the Lead Technical Reviewers or the Project Manager or his designated representative.
O b
\
, e, - , . - ,
l 1
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION l
q pg 3201. 001
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation V Preparation and Control REV.: 2 DATE: 4/21/83 , j g 6 8 PREPARED BY: l/ . APPROVED BY: ?
PAGE of - V rto- )- - ^ t C' M .)
3.2 Each final engineering evaluation shall be verified by the review of an individual who has qualifications at least sufficient to originate the evoluotion. The reviewer shall not be the originator but may be the Project Manager or on LTR. After reviewing, the reviewer shall sign and date the engineering evoluotion cover sheet. To provide a basis for future traceability and approval, the extent and method of review shall be clearly described on the Engineering Evaluation Cover Sheet. Any comments shcIl be resolved with the originator prior to signoff.
3.3 The LTR, Project Manager, or his designated representative shall indicate approval by signing only the cover sheet when the evaluation and its review have been completed.
4.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.1 Identification After all approvals have been obtained, the final engineering evolu-otion shall be assigned a control identification number by the Project Manager or his designated representative in the following format:
l 3201-001-XXX h n b Sequence Number Subject File identifier Project identifier lO 9
e
PROJECT INSTRUCTION p Pl 3201. 001
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation
( Preparation and Control REW 2 DATE: 4/21/83 ,
PAGE 7
of 8 PREPARED BY:
-s
/xa APPRQVED BY:
^/
~-
To facilitate reference between engineering evoluction packages, the originator may call the project Administrative Manager in Bethesda, to reserve o Control I.D. No. This number is not final or officially recognized' until all approvcis have been obtcined and the date of revision entered on the Engineering Evaluation Register (Attachment C).
4.2 Retention The final engineering evoluotion shall be indexed using the Engineer-ing Evoluotion Register (Attachment C) and filed in the oppropriate project engineering evoluotion file. Distribution of originals shall not be made unless specific written instructions are issued to the contrary. All final engineering evaluations shall be maintained by the Project Manager or his designated representative.
5.0 REVISIONS 5.1 Engineering evoluctions may be revised to clarify misinformation (e.g., inputs). Supporting engineering evoluctions will not require revision to update the latest status of the review since these documents do not generally serve os design documents nor as vehicles l
to document the disposition of the current review process. To simplify internal , control cnd preserve the history of evolving reviews, new supporting engineering evoluctions should be written as appro-priate. These evaluations, along with the reporting process docu-mented in PI-3201-008 will collectively provide the required history necessary to support on auditable review process. As discussed, the
' b v primary evoluction will tie all of the supporting evoluctions together.
\
. _ _ _ _ _ _ , - _ _ y
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 001
SUBJECT:
Engineering Evaluation s Preparation and Control REY.: 2 DATE: 4/21/83 il f 8 PREPARED BY: t/ l APPROVED BY: /-
PAGE 8 of
,Tb# -
! -r - /C 5.2 Revisions to final engineering evoluotions shcIl be made, verified, and approved in the some manner os the original engineering evaluation.
5.3 Supersede'd final engineering evoluotions shcIl either be identified as such on each page or shall be securely bound with at least the cover page so identified. The engineering evaluation register shall note this action by making reference to the new revision of the evaluation. in order to preserve the history of the review' process, superseded evaluations shall be maintained i i the same file os final evoluotions.
- 6. QA AUDIT CHECKLIST 6.1 Audits of the implementation of this procedure shall be conducted by the PGAE using Audit Checklist PI-3201-0010A (Attachment D).
I O l
i
)
ATTACHMENT A, Pl.3201 001, REV 2 ENGINEERING EVALUATION COVER SHEET O TITLE _ CONT.10. NO. 3201 -001
)
PROJECT: CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY MIDLAND IDCV NO. OF SHTS.
SUPERSEDES ENC. EVAL. NO.
REV. NO. REVISION ORIGINATOR DATE REVIEWED BY DATE APPROVED BY DATE 1
O PRIMARY EVALUATION O SUPPORT!NG EVALUATION TOPIC NUMBER TOPIC TITLE METHOD / EXTENT OF REVIEW PURPOSE CONTENTS (SEE SECTION 2., PI-3201-001)
O ABSTRACT O OVERVIEW OF iiEVIEW PROCESS O BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION O SOURCES OF INFORMATION/ REFERENCES O eACKGROUND DATA (INPUTS, ASSUMPTIONS, RELATED CALCULATIONS)
O ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (CODES, STANDARDS, FSAR, NRC CUIDANCE, REGULATIONS)
O EVALUATION (DOCUMENTATION OF REVIEW AGAINST CHECK LIST,(ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)
O O CONCLUSIONS TERA CORPORATION
-p --- y,------- m- - -
y , __ - -.,,. - , - . - _ _ , - - _ - - - - , , - - - - - - - - . , - - - - - -
n : i 2
V d T i, N EE O18 0
0- MP 0
UY 2 F E CT 3
O T O l A D P,
1 U
(
1 4
t t
u t
I E C C V A A E W .
T T P R OD A HE
O N .
N O O D I N I T C T A I P N M OO R T C O
F N
I E
L T
F I O T S
E O C R
U O
S
/
S E
C N {
E E R T A
E D F
E R V E
t I
/
N O
I TR AE CB I M F
I U TN N
N E O
l D .
I T
A U
L /
A G V R E
G Ot E N GfO L I NH T
I R I TT T E. AU t
c i t INA O i P
O N T
G E
G I
R O
m
$OOn
- OZ
/~"g ,, (g Y Q)
All AO tMENT C, PI 3201 -001, F7 V. 2 ENGINEERING EVALUATION REGISTER SUPE (SEDED REVi$lON DATE CONTROL ID. NO. TITLE O I 2 3 4 5 6
> ~
O 9
O
'N z
I
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 0010A
SUBJECT:
Audit Checklist for Engineering REV.: 1 DATE: 4/21/83 PAGE 1
'of 3 PREPARED BY:
J
/>& . APPROVED BY:
' a u-
,r
- ^ - >
s 9
- 1. PURPOSE This checklist shall be used by the PGAE to verify the implementation of ,
PI-3201-001, Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control, for those engineering evaluations directly related to Quality Assured Activities cs j identified in this procedure. It shall not be used for any other categories of onalyses unless instructions to the contrary are established by the PGAP,.
?
- 2. CHECKLIST 2.1 Engineering evaluation cover sheet and each page properly prepared and identified?
2.2 Source of information/ references per Section 2.5?
2.3 Prepored per contents checklist, os applicoble?
2.4 Review and approval signatures or initials?
2.5 Extent and method of review indicated on cover sheet?
2.6 Control identification number per PGAP?
2.7 Revisions processed in some manner os original? .
2.8 Primary evoluotions reference supporting evoluotions? _
2.9 Primary evaluations provide sufficient
- history of review process?
2.10 Superseded evaluations identified on index sheet and filed with final evaluation?
O e
l
1 PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 0010A
SUBJECT:
Audit Checklist for Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control 2 3 PREPARED BY: ./ APPROVED BY: -
pag .Of ._ s1d b. u' ar. *
- 3. COMMENTS
. 3.1 Identify engineering evaluation (s) used in preparing this checklist, state specific cause of any unsatisfactory ratings, and recommend corrective action, if any.
i i
l l
3.2 Prepared by: Date:
O l .
l
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION O- PI 3201. 0010A
SUBJECT:
Audit Checklist for Engineering Evaluation Preparation and Control REV.: i DATE: 4/21/83 ,
3 3 PREPARED BY: ./l APPROVED BY: ,,
PAGE .,g - -AJ O. , ,
s/
- 4. FOLLOWUP 4.1 Recommended corrective action of item 3.1 satisf actorily implemented?
4.2 If not, state other action taken to resolve the deficiency, or state rationale justifying no corrective action token, and whether this item is open or closed.
. iO l
l l
l 4.3 Prepared by: Date:
l l p G
i
)
l 1
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI- 3201 - 002
SUBJECT:
occument controi cover Sheet REV.: 1 DATE: 5/2/83 ,
j PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
PAGE of 4 wmg,/ V. ,
it 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this project instruction is to establish the require-ments for control of final reports and other documents that are developed by TERA in performance of the Midland independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Program.
l.2 Scope Documents such as drawings, Quality Assurance Audit Reports, Draft Final Reports, Draft Interim Technical Reports, Final Reports, Interim Technical Reports, and Monthly Status Reports shall be controlled by this Project Instruction.
2.0 PREPARATION 2.1 All documents under the scope of this Project Instruction shall include a document control cover sheet (Attachment A) prepared as completely as possible and attached as Sheet I of each such docu-ment prior to review and opproval.
(>
\ .. -
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI- 3201 - 002
SUBJECT:
Document Control Cover Sheet REV.: 1 DATE: 5/2/83 f _
PAGE 2 of g PREPARED BY:
g Ag
/ . APPROVED BY: .-
3 m f( , ,
=
3.0 REVIEW AND APPROVAL 3.1 All documents under the scope of this Project instruction shall be designated as preliminary until reviewed and approved within TERA.
Such preliminary documents shall be maintained in separate files for reference purposes only. Each document under the scope of this Project Instruction shcIl be reviewed by on individual who has the qualifications to criginate the document. The reviewer shall not be the originator, but may be the Project Manager or Lead Technical Reviewers. After reviewing, the reviewer shall sign and date the document control cover sheet. Any comments shall be resolved with p' the originator prior to signoff. The Project Manager (or his o
designated representative) shall indicate his approval by signing only the cover sheet when the document and its review have been completed.
4.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.1 Identification After all required approvals have been obtained, all documents under the scope of this: Project Instruction shall be assigned a control identification number by the Project Manager or his designated representative in the following format:
O
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION o
O PI- 3201 - 002
SUBJECT:
oocument controi cover Sheet REV.: 1 DATE: 5/2/83 :
of 4 PREPARED BY: / APPROVED BY: ..-
PAGE 3 NmJ
.s-
&r p
n 3201-XXX-X-XXX h JL J L J L Sequence Number Report Type Identifier Subject File Identifier
- Project Identifier
- 4.1.1 The following report type identifiers shall be utilized:
A- Drawings D- Draft Final Report R- Draft Interim Technical Report T- Interini Technical Report F- Final Report M- Monthly Status Report 4.I.2 Each report type shall be assigned a sequence number, starting from 000 to 999.
- 4.2 Retention 1
l Draft Final Reports, Final Reports, Draft Interim Technical Reports, Interim Technical Reports, and Monthly Status Reports shall be indexed in
[
Subject File 3201-002 using a Document / Report Control Register (Attachment B-l). Drawings will be filed in 3201-002 and Quality Asrirance Audit Reports will be filed in 3201-00S, using appropriate registers, Attachments B-2 and B-3, respectively.
J Project and subject file identifiers are established in the PQAP.
PROJECT INSTRUCTION d PI- 3201 - 002
SUBJECT:
oocument Control Cover Sheet REV.: 1 DATE: 5/2/83 ,
f PREPARED BY: ~ APPROVED BY:
PAGE 4 of 4 u/ W
, ,- ,' L -
4-4.3 Distribution l
l Distribution of originals shall not be made unless specific written instructions are issued to the contrary. All such final documents shall be maintained by the Project Manager or his designated representative. These documents shall be transmitted to the client as final reports in accordance with project schedules.
5.0 REVISIONS 5.1 Revisions to final documents shall be made, ve.ified, and approved in the some manner as ?ne original document.
5.2 Superseded final documents shall be so identified and transferred to a superseded document file. The Document Control Register shall note this action by referencing the new revision of the documents.
6.0 QA AUDIT CHECKLIST 6.1 Audits of the implementation of this procedure shall be conducted by the PGAE using the appropriate Audit Checklist PI-3201-002GA (Attachment C).
O l
l
Attachment A, PI-3201-002 DOCUMENT CONTROL COVER SHEET CONT.1.D. NO.
NO. OF SHTS.
l SUPERSEDES DOCUMENT NO. l REV.NO. REVISION ORIGINATOR DATE REVIEWED BY DATE APPROVED BY DATE i
SUBECT
[
O - Se SOURCES of IPEORMATION euf REFERENCES O
i GAoy Be Continued On A Sepeate Sheet)
I 1
Attachment B-1, PI-3201-002 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER PROJ. NO. uni PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE of SUBJECT FILE NOe - 3201-002 (Recorts)
Document Title Sequen e ubnumber Date of issue Rev.No.
l l
1 1
i l
l TERA CORPORADON l
_ e'64RS T". La7gm R
T S
I D
e V
E R
E EU Ac D
~
R
_ T S
I S D N
O O
- I N T E .
A L I
V E
C: F R I
T T FCE CE I
CJ J E OB P R P S U
E S T5S D D N
A S R G T N S I
I D
W A
R OD R V
E R
O F
R F E
T E SI T G D E
R L
O R R E
T B N N M
O OI U
C T N E A D T P C I
NYTOL E
M U
C O
D E
L T
I T
T O N E
M U
C F O O D O
N.
J O G E
RA P P
Attachment B-3, Pi-3201-002 GUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT REGISTER PROJ. NO. ~ 3201 PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV I I PAGE of
SUdJECT FILE NO. - 3201-005 l
Occument Title Sequen e ubnumber Date of issue Rev.No.
i l I i
1 g ERA CORPORA 110N
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION J pl_ 3201. 005
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENTATION OF OBSERVATIONS 0 DATE: 5/2/83
] OEV.:
1 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: .
1 ~of 5 s * - '~
l PAGE g 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Project Instruction is to provide a disposition mechanism for Potential Open items or Open items which are not sufficiently serious to warrant classification as Confirmed items and cannot be dismissed directly as Resolved items, but which should be reviewed and corrected as necessary by Consumers Power Company during the completion of the Midland project.
1.2 SCOPE
,m This Project instruction applies to all Potential Open items and Open items k- meeting the definition of an Observation presented below.
l.3 DEFINITION An Observation is either a Potential Open item (as determined in accordance with Project Instruction PI 3201-008) which has been evaluated in accordance with this Project Instruction as being a deficiency of a minor nature which does not require project team concurrence with its resolution or on Open item that has been re-classified as an Observation.
! 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES AND APPROVALS l
2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF OBSERVATIONS 1
l As part of the review of a Potential Open Ite.m conducted by a Lead Technical Reviewer (LTR) in accordance with PI-3201-008, the following questions shall be l
Q v
considered:
l l
! B-83-194 l
l l PROJECT INSTRUCTION )
] pj_ 3201. 005
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENTATION OF OBSERVATIONS 0 DATE: 5/2/83
} REV.:
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: (
2 of 5 %
lPAGE I
- a. Is the item on obvious typographical error? (An example of an obvious typographical error would be the the state-ment "
. . . in accordance with paragraph 3.21 of this specification" when no such paragraph exists and where paragraph 3.12 provides the expected information.)
- b. Is a user of the document containing the item likely to become aware of the deficiency os he makes use of the document or is he unlikely to apply the erroneous docu-ment in such a manner os to compound the deficiency?
(For example, o piping pressure drop calculation for a normal flow condition which contains a difference of 0.2 psi in a 100 psi pressure drop is unlikely to result in a significant deficiency which could be compounded.)
- c. Is the item such that when it is corrected, a change in the design, fabrication, or installation of equipment or components will probably not result?
U The LTR shall consider the answers to these quest!ons in entering a recom-mendation onto the OCR form (reference: Attachment A to PI-3201-008). Af ter considering the answers to the above questions, using his own judgment, and deciding whether the item is symptomatic of a process deficiency, the LTR may recommend classification of the deficiency as an Observatlon in accordance with 2.2 below.
2.2 RECOMMENDATION FOR CLASSIFICATION AS AN OBSERVATION If the LTR determines that a deficiency noted as a Potential Open item should be classified as on Observation, he shall enter a statement to that effect in the recommendation section of the OCR form, provide a basis for that recommendo-tion, and recommend processing of the item in accordance with this Project Instruction. The project team (LTRs and Project Manager (PM) may determine that on Open item should be re-classified as an Observation. The procedure v
B-83-194
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION l PI_ 3201. 005
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENTATION OF OBSERVATIONS 0 DATE: 5/2/83
} REV.:
PREPARED BY: .
APPROVED BY: j i 5
IPAGE 3 'of ,
f, I
documented in Section 3.0 of this Project Instruction shall be followed for preparation of OCRs as Observations.
2.3 ITEMS NOT CLASSlFIED AS OBSERVATION When the LTR determines that a Potential Open item is not on Observation, he shall complete the processing of the OCR in accordance with PI-3201-008.
2.4 REVIEW BY PROJECT MANAGER All recommendations for classification as an Observation shall be reviewed by the Project Manager. He shall determine whether he agrees with the recom-mendation ond shall use one of the following alternatives for disposition:
C'\
(_./
( a. If he agrees that the item meets the criteria for an Observation, he shall apply paragraph 2.5 of this Project Instruction.
- b. If he agrees that the item probably meets the criteria for an Observation, but desires additional review by the Project Team, he shall distribute the OCR in accordance with paragraph 2.6 of this Project Instruction, with or without his additional comments.
- c. If he believes that the item probably does not meet the criteria for an Observation, he shall confer with the responsible LTR and they shall determine whether the recommendation should be changed. They shall agree to process the item in accordaned with PI-3201-008 or
, paragraph 2.6 of this Project instruction.
1 I
l 1
(v l
l B-83-194 l
l
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
- pl_ 3201. 005
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENTATION OF OBSERVATIONS REV.: 0 DATL 5/2/83 4 5 PREPARED BY: 1 APPROVED BY:
PAGE of ,
N 3 2.5 OBSERVATION CLASSIFICATION AND APPROVAL The Project Manager shall sign the Potential Open item OCR form for those
( items in which he agrees with the LTRs recommendation for classification as on Observation. For Open items re-classified as Observations, the Project Manager shall sign both the OCR form which documents the Observation and a Resolved item form, signifying completion of the project team's review. (Refer to Section 3.0 of this Project Instruction for procedures related to preparation of the:,e
- documents.)
2.6 PROJECT TEAM REVIEW m
If the Project Manager determines that on item classified by the LTR as an U Observation (including Open items proposed for re-classification as an Observa-tion) should be reviewed by the project team, he shall distribute copies of the OCR to all LTRs and at an appropriate time organize a meeting or telecon with l
the project team for the purpose of an integrated review of the classification.
l The project team may conclude that the item is properly classified as an Observation. Otherwise the project team shall require that the OCR be 1
1 processed in accordance with PI-3201-008.
3.0 PREPARATION Observations shall be documented on OCR forms (Attachment A to PI-3201-008).
,The OCR recommendation section shall indicate its proposed classification as on Observation. This shall be accomplished by checking the " Resolution" space on the OCR form and the addition of a statement such as "This item is resolved by classification as an Observation." If the project team (LTRs and PM) determines p that an Open item should be re-classified as an Observation, the PM or his
" designated representative shall prepare a Resolved item report to document the B-83-194
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION j pl_ 3201. 005
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENTATION OF OBSERVATIONS 0 DATE: 5/2/83
] REW PREPARED BY: s APPROVED BY: ,,
lPAGE 5 of 5 .-
final classification of the item as an Observation. The Resolved item Report shall reference the associated Observation and the superceeded Open item Report. All OCR reports prepared in accordance with this Project instruction shall otso comply with the requirements of Section 3.0 of PI-3201-008.
4.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.1 IDENTIFICATION Observations shall be identified in accordance with the instructions documented in Section 5.1 of Project Instruction PI-3201-008. The " report type identifier" for Observations shall be the letter "B".
U 4.2 RETENTION Observations shall be indexed using a Document Control Register (Attach-ment A), and filed in project controlled document file 008. Distribution of originals shall not be made unless specific written instructions are issued to the contrary. All such final documents shall be maintained by the Project Manager or his designated representative.
l 5.0 DISTRIBUTION AND INTERCHANGE OF INFORMATION The project manager may distribute Observations or the Observation Register to CPC, NRC, and others when appropriate and in conformance with other Project Instructions.
1 V(% B-83-194 l
l l
l
Attachment A, PI-3201-005 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER PROJ. NO. 3201 PROJECT Midiand IDcV Program g PAGE of OBSERVATIONS I SUBJECT FILE NO. . 3201-008 Document Title Date of Issue Rev.No.
Seque e ubnumber l
l 1 P l
g nuconeoma
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 008
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Re:olved Item Reports, Finaing Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and finqing Resolution Reports PAGE 1 of 1?
PREPARED BY:
/ -1 d APPROVED BY: -
w l.0 GENERE I.1 Purpose The purpose of this instruction is to establish the requirements for preparation and control of Open, Confirm:d and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports required for the Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV)
Program.
l.2 Scope O
V The evoluction process leading to Findings, including the resolution of Findings, shall be documented throughout the IDCV program, cate-gorized as to the status of disposition and on auditable record maintained showing the bases for the determination and categoriza-tion. OCR, item Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports shall be prepared and controlled in accordance with the provisions of this instruction.
I,3 Definitions 1.3.1 Potential Open item A determination by an IDCV reviewer thct the item is a potential deviction in implementation of design criteria, design or construction commitments and design or construc-O G
l
i
~
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O ri 2201 - 008 sua;scr: ereperet4en end controi or Open, coerirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REW 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and Finding Resolution Reports 12 PREPARED BY: / APPROVED BY: c PAGE 2 of ,s A , .,
i tion procedures, thus requiring additional investigation or confirmatory analysis in areas such as: quality assurance or design control implementation, licensing criteria or commit-ments compliance, analytical or mathematical technical op-l proach, design analysis evaluation, specifications review,
- field configuation and constructed product verification, etc.
j Potential Open items that are verified by the project team (Project Manager and all Lead Technical Reviewers) become Open items, unless they are classified as observations 'n i accordance with Project Instruction PI-3201-005.
lO i.3.2 Onee item The item has the potential for becoming a Confirmed item, but additional investigation or confirmatory analysis is neces-sary to make a final judgement.
l.3.3 Confirmed item The item is judged to be on apparent Finding by the review team and will require action, such as additional documenta-tion not utilized by the team that documents the resolution
( of the item or additional analysis, design or construction changes or procedural changes that may be necessary to resolve the item. Confirmed items that are later verified -
l become Findings.
O V
l 1
1
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 008
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and finqing Resolution Reports PAGE 3
of 12 PREPARED BY: I./
mp APPROVED BY:
cs a .
w .,-
1.3.4 Resolved item i
Sufficient additional information was available in the ongoing review to resolve the Open or Confirmed item and to com-pletely close out any concern.
l.3.5 Finding A verified deviction in implementation of design criteria, design or construction commitments and design or construc-tion procedures in creas such as: quality assurance, design or O cee trvctie" ceetrei, emeixsi . aesise, emsieeeries eveivetiem.
specification, design or construction implementation, field installation, etc. Findings may fall into two categories; tho:e affecting the ability of systems, components or structures to meet their intended safety function and those without an impact to safety functions.
1.3.6 Resolved Finding Sufficient additional information was made available by CPC, the original design or construction organization to resolve the Finding and completely close out any concern about the Find-ing. Finding resolution may require additional anclys!s, design or construction changes or procedural changes. Full
! resolution requires the identification of root-cause and ex-tent and a plan for corrective action if required.
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201 .008
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 an.d liincyng Resolution Reports t.
of 12 PREPARED BY: V - APPROVED BY: c PAGE -
A.
~
t w s; '
./
g 1.3.7 OCRs i
Reports written to summarize the status of disposition of items under review within the IDCV program prior to any definitive conclusion being mode. Definitive conclusions are made at the Finding or Finding resolution stage in the reporting process. The term OCR may generally be in-terpreted as including Potential Open items.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES i
O 2.i The technical reviewers are responsible for preparing OCR ltem Reports, recommending the classification of OCR ltems and forward-
[
ing these to their Lead Technical Reviewer (LTR). Note that items l
initially identified by technical reviewers are Potential Open items until such a time that these items are reviewed and approved by the project team os Open items.
2.2 The Lead Technical Reviewers are responsible for the review of and concurrence in all Potential Open items and OCRs forwarded by their
! technical reviewers, the classification of OCRs, the preparation of Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports, and the forwarding l
of all of these reports to the Project Manager (PM). The LTRs shall I consider input provided to them by the technical reviewers. An LTR may perform the duties of the technicci reviewer.
l l
1
PROJECT INSTRUCTION o
V PI 3201. 008
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and fiin(ing Resolution Reports 5 12 t APPROVED BY: .-
PAGE cW PREPARED BY:</ ,--y s &. ,<
' ~
.j 2.3 The Project Manager is responsible for periodically organizing meet-ings or telecons of the project team (Project Manager and all LTRs) for the purpose of conducting on integrated review of the classifico-tion and significance of OCRs and Findings, and the resolution of Findings.
2.4 The Project Manager is responsible for forwarding OCR ltem Re-ports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports to the Prin-cipal-in-Charge and Senior Review Team (SRT); and forwarding Con-firmed item Reports. Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports to outside parties. The Project Manager may perform the dutics of the LTR.
n U
2.5 The project team (Project Manager and all LTRs) shall review all Potential Open items forwarded by the LTRs, review the classifico-tion of cnd attempt to resolve Open or Confirmed items, conduct further technical review or call for further technical review to clarify, expand or reassess Open or Confirmed items. The project team is responsible for verification of a Confirmed item leading to the declaration of a Finding, resolution of a Finding or the re-classification of a Finding as " resolved" by issuance of a Finding Resolution Report.
l l
2.6 The Principal-in-Charge (PIC) is responsible for concurring with the classification of OCRs, Findings, Findings Resolution Reports, mak-ing a determination if a review of OCRs is required by the Senior Review Team, and directing the Project Manager to forward Con-O v
i l
l PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 008
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and Finding Resolution Reports 6 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
PAGE of 12 , p/ na ,
3, . 2_ i firmed item Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Re-ports to outside parties.
2.7 The Senior Review Tecm is responsible for reviewing OCR ltem Reports as requested by the PIC or the Chairman of the SRT. The SRT shcIl review all Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports, identifying the need for clarification, expansion of review or re-ossessment by the PM, LTRs and technical reviewers. The SRT shall review the safety significance of forwarded OCR Reports and Finding Reports and may recommend a course of action to the PIC and PM for identification of root cause and extent. The SRT shall review the Finding Resolution Reports to essess the acceptability of any re-medini actions taken by CPC and the original design or construction organization.
2.8 The Chairman of the SRT is responsible for reviewing all OCRs to determine whether a review by the SRT is necessary, independent of the PlC's request for a review of specific OCRs. He is also
- responsible for coordinating the SRT's review efforts associated with l Findings and Finding Resolution Reports and reporting results and l
recommendations to the PIC and PM.
l 3.0 PREPARATION l 3.1 The preparation of reports under the scope of this Project Instruction shcIl follow the report generation process shown on the diagram, l
" Report Flow Chart" (Figure 1).
1 O
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 008
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Ce?.:rol of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and{indingResolutionReports 7 og 12 PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
PAGE
. ~ .,
7 3.2 Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall be prepared utilizing the attached forms (Attachments A, B, C) ossuring that all pertinent information is documented completely and orderly.
3.3 Potential Open item Reports shall be prepared utilizing the attached form for Open item Reports (Attachment A). Note that a Potential Open item may in fact be synonymous with an Open item if a technical reviewer's recommendation is agreed upon by the project team cs documented by the Project Manager's signature.
3.4 The OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports including any supplementary sketches, notes, and explanatory infor-motion shall be prepared in such a manner os to cllow any person not familiar with the work, but technically qualified, to understand it without extensive additional inquiry and research.
3.5 OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports do not '
require a document control cover sheet.
3.6 All OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports
, shall controlled in accordance with instructions documented in Sec-l tion 5.0 of this instruction.
O
i PROJECT INSTRUCTION
]
/ PI- 3201. _0DfL
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports REY.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 PREPARED BY: / s APPROVED BY: .
PAGE 8 of 12 _ ,, - s ;, o f-W e/
i 4.0 VERIFICATION AND APPROVAL 4.1 OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall be designated as preliminary until verified by the review of the project team and signing by the Project Manager. These reports are
- controlled in accordance with section 5.0 of this instruction upon
{ signature by the Project Manager.
l 4.2 The technical reviewers shall sign OCR Reports thereby verifying the
- occuracy of the information presented and signifying that the report
! has been prepared under his review.
IO 4.3 The LTRs shall sign OCR ltem Reports signifying his concurrence.
The LTRs shall sign Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports
! thereby verifying the occuracy of information presented and signify-ing that the report has been prepared under his review.
4.4 The Project Manager shall opprove OCR Reports and Finding Reports l and Finding Resolution Reports signifying completion of review and concurrence by the project team.
1 4.5 Potential Open items that are not opproved by the project team and therefore never to become Open items are controlled in accordance with section 5.0 of this Project Instruction.
! 4.6 The Principal-in-Charge shall sign OCR Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports signifying his review, concurrence and determination whether OCRs reporis require SRT review.
O
\
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O PI 3201 008
SUBJECT:
preparation and control of Open, confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and Find.ing Resolution Reports 9 12 MMED BW -
MgD BY: -
PAGE of man{)~
o,i 4.7 The SRT Chairman shall sign all OCR Reports which the SRT is requested to review, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports thereby signifying completion of the SRT's review and concurrence.
5.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL 5.1 Identification After all required concurrence and approvals through and including the Project Manager have been obtained, the OCR Reports, Finding
]
. Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports shcIl be assigned a control identification number by the Project Manager or his designated representative in the following format:
3201-008-X-XXX JL 4 LJ L n Sequence Number Report Type Identifier Subject File Identifier
- Project Identifer *
- Project and subject file identifiers are established in the PGAP.
I l
I PROJECT INSTRUCTION O PI 3201 . 008
SUBJECT:
preparation and control or Open, confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.:1 , DATE: 4/14/83 and Finding Resolution Reports PAGE 10 of 12 PREPARED BY:
s
' ~
./}
, APPROVED BY:
.)
.g.
,w ,
5.1.1 The following report type identifiers shall be utilized:
P - Potential Open item Report 0 - Open item Report C - Confirmed item Report R - Resolve item Report F - Finding Report Z - Finding Resolution Report 5.1.2 Related OCR and Finding Reports or Finding Resolution Reports shall be cssigned the some sequence number, starting Q
v from 000 to 999. Note that all sequence numbers may not be used for all report types.
5.2 Retention The Potential Open item, OCR, Finding, and Finding Resolution Reports shall be indexed using the appropriate Document Control Register (Attachment D-i (Potential Open item Reports), D-2 (Open item Reports), D-3 (Confirmed item Reports), D-4 (Resolved item Reports), D-5 (Finding Reports), and D-6 (Finding Resolution Reports), and filed in the appropriate project controlled documents file. Distribution of originals shall not be made unless specific
( written instructions are issued to the contrary. All such final documents shall be maintained by the Project Manager or his designated representative.
l lO
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O ei 201 008 sua;ect: greperetion eme contro, or open, con,4rmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/14/83 and Finding Resolution Reports MENED BW PAGE II of 12 /:
-~ sy -
c Mg/ D BY: 9
- n. j 5.3 Tracking Potential Open Items, Open items, Confirmed items, Resolved items, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall be trocked as to their current status of disposition utilizing the format shown on Attachment E. This tracking system shall be attached to each monthly IDCV program status report.
6.0 DISTRIBUTION AND INTERCHANGE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Confirmed item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports shall be distributed by the Project Manager to CPC (with a carbon copy to the original design or construction organization), NRC and other outside parties on the IDCV program service list upon receiving direction from the Principol-in-Charge.
6.2 It shall be the responsibility of the Project Manager to determine when there is a nod to have o meeting of the project team with CPC and the original design or construction organizction to discuss Con-firmed items, Findings or the resolution of Findings. He shall notify the NRC Regional Administrator five days prior to meetings to discuss Findings or Finding Resolution Reports so that the NRC con make reasonable efforts to notify representatives of interested members of the public. Meetings to discuss Confirmed items may be held without prior notification of the NRC Regional Administrator provided " substantive" matters related to Findings are not to be O
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201. 008
SUBJECT:
Preparation and Control of Open, Confirmed and Resolved Item Reports, Finding Reports REV.: 1 DATE: 4/la/83 and F;inding Resolution Reports 12 12 PREPARED BY: // APPROVED BY: ,-
PAGE , of 9%
J%
1 ,
discussed. Substantive matters are those associated with definitive conclusions which are generally made at the Finding or Finding Resolution stage of the reporting process.
7.0 REVISIONS .
7.1 Revisions to final documents shall be mode, verified, and approved in the some manner os the original document.
7.2 Superseded final documents shall be so identified and transferred to o O superseded d cument binder. The document control register shall note this action by referencing the new revision of the document.
Revisions shall be entered into the Document Control Register.
l l
l O .
TECHNICAL A REVIEW BY Review TEAM 1P O
RESOLVED ctagskafios liEM BY LTR*5, P NITEM "
v
[
1 P 1 P FitCING REVIEW &
RESOLVED CLA5?!FICATION ITEM BY LTR*5.
U[
1P 1P
' / DISPOSITION \
OPEN ITEM
/
1 F i
1r 9P if FURTHER REVIEW ACTION PL AN BY Review TEAM M TFt.Y PREPAR ATION BY C / NRC REPORT..
E5 ORGANIZATION RESOLVED PEviEW &
ITEM CLA55lFICATION BY LTR 5. ACT10N PLAN PM FOR RESOLUTION w r O
V CONFIRMED
'r ITEM REVIEW g RE5 L 6 v pp gc CLASSFICATIO S&
BY LTR 5, 1 P v
MONTHLY 1P 1P STATUS DISPOSITION REPORT ** BY PIC
- MONTHLY A
FitCING 1 P W U PREPARATION I II OF RE500NSE BY CPC/ORICNAL DESIGN &
FINAL Review ORGANIZATION "
C 1 r IF TE I AL REPORT OR FNAL REPORT **
1 P
, A
! KEY: PM . PROJECT MANAGER l LTR . LEAD TECPNICAL REVIEWER PIC . P91NCIPAL.N.CHARCE NOTE:
- DISTRIBUTED TO IOCV SERVICE LIST CPC - CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY O
v FIGURE I
- REPORT FLOW CHART MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM l
l
[
ATTACHMENT A. PI-?201-008 MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, CONFIRMED AND RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 3201 008 O TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN RESOLVED CONFIRMED ITEM DOC NO. 3201-008- -
REV.NO.
DATES REPORTED TO: LTR SRT PROJECT TEAM / PROJECT MCR.
PRINCIPAL-IN. CHARGE CPC/DE51GN ORG.
STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
IDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):
DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:
SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:
O RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION :
l I
l s l
i COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):
REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):
[ SIGNATURE (S):
OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)
ORIGINATOR FOR PROJECT TEAM IN-CHARGE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE 1
i
, . _ _ = _ . - _ _ . - . - .
ATTACHMENT B, PI-3201-008 MIDLAto INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION FINDING REPORT FILE NO. 3201-008 CLASS: SAFETY NCN-SAFETY DOC NO. 3201-00A -
REV.NO.
DATES REPORTED TO: PROECT TEAM /PROECT MGR. PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE SRT CPC/ DESIGN ORG. ,
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEMS (S), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
DESCRIPTION OF FINDING:
t SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDING:
O RECOMMENDATION:
COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):
I 8 REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):
SIGNATURE (S):
FINDING REPORT PROECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE SRT (!F REGUIRED)
ORIGINATOR (LTR) FOR PROECT TEAM DATE DATE DATE DATE
_ _ _ - . _ , _ . _ . _ _ . - . . _ . . _ , , _ _ . _ _ . . . . _ . - . _ _ . _ . . . _ . . . _ _ . . _ ~ . . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . , _ _ -
ATTACHMENT C. DI-1?nt-^^Q MIDLAto INDEPENDENT DESIGN abo CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION FINDING RESOLUTION REPORT
% FILE NO. 3201-008 CLASS: SAFETY NON-SAFETY DOC NO. 3201-008- -
REV.NO.
DATES REPORTED TO: PROJECT TEAM / PROJECT MGR. PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE SRT CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEMS (S), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
DESCRIPTION OF FINDING (OR REFERENCE DOC. NO. OF FINDING REPORT):
DESCRIPTION OF RESOLUTION:
l O
RESOLUTION BASED UPON FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION:
1
(
COMMENTS BY SRT (lF REQUIRED):
SIGNATURE (S):
FINDING RESOLUTION PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE SRT (IF REQUIRED)
REPORT ORGIN. (LTR) FOR PROJECT TEAM DATE DATE DATE DATE
I l
ATTACHMENT D-1, PI-3201-008 l DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER
~
O eaoa "o 32o PAGE 1 of 1 eaosec7 Consumers Power C mpany Midland IDCV SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-008 (Potential Open Item Reports )
. Document Title Sequen ubnumber Date of issue Rev.No.
O I
O g-c -
ATTACHMENT D-2, PI-3201-008 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER O esoa "o- 32ot ~
PAGE 1 of 1 esoaect- co"s"=ers eo er co ne"> "4eie"a toev !
SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-008 (0 pen Item Reports)
Document Title Sequen u5 number Date of issue Rev.No.
4 O
l O
l
$ wra CGPGADON
(
ATTACHMENT D-3, PI-3201-008 DOCUMENT /PEPORT CONTROL REGISTER O esos "o- 32ot ~ r<<oaecT - co#somers eo er compe#7 84eie#8 tocv PAGE 1 of 1 3201-008 (Confirmed Item Reports)
SUBJECT FILE NO. -
Document Title ubnumber Date of Issue Rev.No.
Seque me O
l l
O g mo m-- .
,m----- ,e >w , , - , , - - - , -,- ,--, -- -- , - ,- -
- , , , - , - - , - - - - - ~ - - - - . , , - - - --, n-.~ --
ATTACHMENT D-4, PI-3201-008 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER 3201' Q PROJ. NO.
PAGE 1 of 1 PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV l SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-008 (Resolved Item Reports)
Document Title Date of Issue Rev.No.
Sequen ubnumber O
O TERA CORPORATION l _ -
ATTACHMENT D-5, PI-3201-008 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER O Paoa "o-PAGE 1 of 32o t' ~
1 esoaecT - co"s"=ers eo er co ve"> "id1eme 1ocv SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-008 (Finding Reports)
I Document Title Date of issue Rev. No.
ubnumber Sequen O
i l O g oc-m l
' ' ' ' ' " - ~ ' - =-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _
ATTACHMENT D-6, PI-3201-008 1
DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER I PROJ. NO. 3201~ PROJECT - Consumers Power Company Midland IDCV PAGE 1 of 1 SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-308 (Finding Resolution Reports:
' ""* *" # I* Sequen u$ number Date of issue Rev.No.
O I
O g-cmmo I
f ATTACHMENT E, PI-3201-008 1,
OClt, fM) LNG lt[POHT, ANI) fM) LNG ltESOLUTION Iti POI (I IltACKING SYSTEM j MKX. Ate)INDEPLt4XHT [ESICH At4) CONSTHUCIlON VERIFICATION lilOGIAM i
I OCit t&>. fiesp. LTit Potential Orwn Cmlismed Itesolve<1 ficatir.o firwliewn Topic Comments
) Opm leem llem item item fleswwI Itesolution i
Itepor t l
l 1
i f
l i
l
)
l 4
i
i i
l i
PROJECT INSTRUCTION f3 PI 3201 010
SUBJECT:
External Communications, Protocol and the U Preparation of Contact Log Sheets REV.: 1 DATE: 4/15/83 ,
PREPARED BY: / -
APPROVED BY:
PAGE 1 of 7 qx' 1- O v iR, g ~ g -
1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this project instruction is to establish the require-ments for the documentation and control of records summarizing oral communications, meetings, exchanges of written documents and protocol between TERA independent Design and Construction Verifi-cation (IDCV) Program personnel and all other external parties.
l.2 Scope All oral communications, meetings end-exchanges of written docu-ments with parties external to the IDCV review organization that include discussion of any subjects material to the scope of the Midland IDCV Program, status reporting, findings and findings resolu-tion, including recommendations, evoluotions, correspondence, interim and final reporting shall be controlled by this Project Instruction.
- i.3 Protocol l
l The protocol governing communications between Consumers Power l
I Company and TERA shcIl be in accorance with the provisions of Attachment A.
O
- - - = -v
PROJECT INSTRUCTION pv PI 3201. 010
SUBJECT:
External Comnunications, Protocol and the Preparation of Contact Log Sheets REV.: 1 DATE: 4/15/83 ,
of 7 PREPARED BY: / . APPROVED BY: ,
PAGE z
% ,_ T ,. , g,, . j L uw .j l.4 Definitions l
l 1.4.1 Substantive Matters As discussed in Attachment A, substantive matters are those matters where notice of public meetings are required prior to discussion with external parties. In general, issues of a technical nature will not be substantive unless a Finding has been made. Prior to Findings, technical information exchange with external porties will be necessary to obtain information; however, at this stage the project team will not have reached its technical conclusion as to the matters under review. Therefore, discussions prior to findings should not concern project team judgments on engineering assumptions, calculations, design bases, or interpretations of licensing or code requirements. Should any project team reviewer believe that his contacts with external parties will include any of the
- crecs described above, he should consult the Project Manager to solicit a decision on whether this discussion involves a substantive matter prior to engaging in discussions with external parties, i
Should discussions with external parties, which were not anticipated to involve substantive matters, evolve into crecs where substantive matters could be discussed, the project l team reviewers are to avoid any such discussion until resolu-tion with the Project Manager is obtained. This may require l
PROJECT INSTRUCTION p PI 3201. 010
SUBJECT:
External Communications, Protocol and the Preparation of Contact Log Sheets PAGE 3 of 7 PREPARED BY:
m
/
u _
. APPROVED BY:
_1, ,
y
,( /
~s .,
that the meeting or discussion be biforcated or terminated I until notice and a public meeting is arranged.
Other issues that might logically be considered substantive include resolution of difference of project team confirmatory calculations, significent programmatic changes, and identifi-cation of significant safety issues. Discussions with outside porties of these matters require a prior determination by the Project Manager os to whether substantive issues are
- involved.
l.4.2 IDCV Service List Listing of organizations and individuals to which correspon-dence related to the Midland IDCV Program. will be forwarded by TERA (
Reference:
Letter from E. Adensam to H. Levin, dated March 24,1983.
2.0 PREPARATION 2.1 A " Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification Con-tact Log Sheet" (Attachment B) shall be prepared completely; identi-l fying participants in the conversation or meeting, their organizations, the date of the conversation or meeting, on occurate summary of all i substantive issues discussed and an identification of any cetions agreed upon as a result of the conversation or meeting.
I t
I i . - __
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O ri 32o' o'o sua;ect: extern.i cemmenic.tiens, ,,etecei ene tre Preparation of Contact Log Sheets REV.: 1 DATE: 4/15/83 i ,
PAGE 4 _
of 7 PREPARED BY: / APPROVgBY:, g, -
2.2 Requests for information from external organizations shall be docu-mented including on identification of the item requested, the TERA contact, the responsible outside party, the date requested, or the date received, as appropriate. Requests for information may be mede after the fact provided documentation to this effect is provided in a reasonable timeframe.
2.3 Transcripts or written minutes of meetings shall be prepared in accordance with Section 3 of Attachment A. Written minutes shculd provide the same information identified in Section 2.1 of this Project Instruction.
O 2.4 Periodic technical and programmatic status reports shall include the following information:
. Tracking System Summary for OCR ltems, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports (reference PI-3201 -008) e Progress sum:rary and changes to review scope e For Finding Reports, identification of significant safety issues e Current Confirmed items, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports 2.S Periodic financial status reports to CPC shall include: 1 l
e Identification of actual expenditures, projected expenditures, and schedule i
l s b
e
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 3201_ 010
SUBJECT:
External communications, Protocol and the Preparation of Contact Log Sheets REV.: 1 DATE: 4/15/83 I
5 6 PREPARED BY: ./ g APPROVED BY: .,
PAGE of #14W 3 ,, d /
e Work performed during the report period e identifiention of potential problems, consequences, and proposed action e Expected activities in the next report period.
3.0 REVIEW AND APPROVAL 3.1 All contact log sheets prepared under the scope of this Project Instruction shall be designated as final upon logging in the appro-priate project subject file in accordance with the provisions of fw Section 4.0 of this Project Instruction. No further review or approval U is required.
3.2 All documentation, correspondence, requests for information, reports, calculations, etc., issued to external parties shall be issued under the Project Manager's signature or otherwise receive his approval.
l 4.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL i
4.1 Identification Contact log sheets and correspondence including requests for infor-motion shall be assigned a control identification number in accordance with the requirements of Section 4.0, Administrative Control, of the Project Quality Assurance Picn.
O l
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI .3201. 010
SUBJECT:
External Communications, Protocol and the Preparation of Contact 1.og Sheets REW 1 DATE: 4/15/83 PREPARED BY: / APPROVED BY: .-,
PAGE 6 of 7 m g )j f t,. . f
./
4.2 Retention 4.2.1 The contact log sheets shall be indexed using the Control Register (Attachment C) and filed in the appropriate project controlled subject file. All such contact log sheets shall be maintained by the Project Manager or his designated repre-sentative in an auditable form for NRC review.
4.2.2 All other documents shall be indexed and retained in accor-dance with the provisions of Setion 4.0, Administrative Control, of the Project Quality Assurance Plan.
i O 4.3 Distribution 4.3.1 Distribution of contact log sheets shall not be mode unless specific written instructions are issued to the contrary by the Project Manager.
4.3.2 Distribution of requests for information shall as a mintmum l be made to the responsible internal and external parties.
l These requests do not require routine distribution to the l NRC; however, they must be available for NRC review. No other restrictions apply.
4.3.3 Periodic technical and programmatic status reports shall be distributed to the Midland IDCV service list, t
i O
~
PROJECT INSTRUCTION i PI 3201. 010 SURJECT: External Communications, Protocol and the Preparation of Contact Log Sheets REV.: 1 DATE: 4/15/83 ,
7 7 PREPARED BY: / APPRQVED BY: ,,
PAGE of -
s -Q ),; /$ w i J ='
4.3.4 Periodic financial status reports shall only be distributed to the CPC Project Manager or his designoted representolive.
4.3.5 Distribution of other items under the scope of this project instruction shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Attachment A.
5.0 REVISIONS l
5.1 Revi:. ions of contact log sheets shall not be mode by any individuals other than the originator or his designated representative.
5.2 Under no circumstances should facts, figures or any other details of the conversation, meeting, or document be modified except to correct an error of omission or transposition.
I O
ATTACHMENT A O
V PROTOCOL GOVERNING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY AND TFE ORGANIZATION CONDUCTING TFE INDEPENDENT DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM
- l. Recommendations, findings, evaluations, and all exchanges of correspon-dence, including drafts, between the independent reviewer and CPCo will be submitted to the Regional Administrator at the same time as they are submitted to CPCo. For purposes of this protocol, the independent reviewer includes the independent reviewer end any of its subcontractors and Consumers Power Company (CPCo) means CPCo, Babcock and Wilcox, Bechtel, Management Analysis Corporation, S&W, and all of their subcon-tractors.
- 2. The independent reviewer has a clear need for prompt access to whatever information is required to fulfill its role. To this end, the independent reviewer may request documentary material, meet with and interview individuofs, conduct telephone conversations, or visit the site to obtain information without prior notification to the NRC. All communications and transmittals of information shall, however, be documented and such p)
C documentation shall be maintained in a location accessible for NRC examination.
- 3. If the independent reviewer wishes to discuss with CPCo substantive matters related to information obtained, to provide on interim report to CPCo, or to discuss its findings or conclusions with CPCo In advance of completing its report, or if CPCo desires such communication, such discussions shall be accomplished in meetings open to public observation.
In this regard, CPCo shall provide a minimum of five days advance notice to the Regional Administrator of any such meeting. The Regional Administrator shall make reasonable efforts to notify representatives of interested members of the public of the meeting, but the inability of any person to attend shcIl not be cause of delay or postponement of the meeting. Transcripts or written minutes of all such meetings shall be prepared by the organization requesting the meeting and provided to the NRC in a timely manner. Any portion of such meetings which deals with proprietary information may be closed to the public.
- 4. All meetings between the Staff and CPCo and/or the independent reviewer will be open to public observation, except where the Staff determines that it is appropriate to conduct a meeting (s) in private with CPCo and/or the independent reviewer.
- 5. All documents submitted to, or transmitted by, the NRC subject to this Protocol, unless exempt from mandatory public disclosure, will be placed in the NP.C Public Document Rooms in Midland, Michigan and Washington, p D.C., and will be available there for public examination and copying.
d
, \/
ATTAC&%KT B, PI-3201-010 FILE NO. 3201-010 MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOC. NO. 3201-010-h- VERIFICATION CONTACT LOG SHEET REV.NO.
SUMMARY
OF TELECON OR MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
ORGANIZATION (S):
PARTICIPANTS: TERA:
OUTSIDE:
SUMMARY
O l
l l
I l ACTION:
l l
0
ATTACHMENT C, PI-3201-010 DOCUMENT / REPORT CONTROL REGISTER I I P R O J. N O. 3201 PROJECT Midland IDCV Program P'GE A of SUBJECT FILE NO. - 3201-10 Document Title Sequen e ubnumber Date of issue Rev.No.
l 1
W
PROJECT INSTRUCTION sua;scr:
O ei 320, o,2 scepe Chenge seqeests Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program PAGE 1 of o
k c-i .' J ! -
1 !
l.0 GENERAL
_ l.1 Purpose The purpose of this instruction is to provide lead technical reviewers and other participants in the Midland independent Design arid Construction Verification (IDCV) Program with guidance for the documentation and control of program activities not previously planned. The purpose of this documentation is two-fold:
1.1.1 Identification of additional activities beyond the initial scope of the O ,
Midi nd IDCV pr gram which result from the discovery of items in the review process which warrant further investigation.
l.1.2 Control of changes in scope, cost and schedule which are caused by additional activities beyond the initial scope of the Midland IDCV program.
l.2 Scope All changes in the initial scope of the Midland IDCV program as identified in PI-3201-009, Engineering Program Plan, shall be documented in i accordance with the provisions of this instruction.
l All changes in project scope related to administrative matters or contractual agreements shall be documented in accordance with the provisions of this instruction.
A i
i
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
) PI 3201. 012
SUBJECT:
Scope Change Requests Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: - <
PAGE 2 of 9 7 4 ih'_ -
r- ,
i l.3 Criteria for Modification of the loitial Program Scope i
l
_ The Midland IDCV program scope may be modified if any of the following criteria apply:
1.3.1 Design or construction creas experiencing repeated . problems may receive an increased level of review to verify that these problems have been adequately addressed and that they do not exist elsewhere in the same or similar form.
l.3.2 Design or construction creas that previously received a lower level
[l v of review may be subjected to a higher frequency of sampling in order to achieve a sufficient degree of ossurance that the design or constructed facility meets its criteria and commitments.
l.3.3 Design or construction creas where OCRs or Findings (reference:
PI-3201-008) have been identified rney be considered for additionc!
review to provide further confirmation, close out all outstanding issues and fully assess the extent and root cause.
l.3.4 Design or construction creas that have required additional resources to review due to external factors such as information retrieval will require scope modification.
l.3.5 Design or construction creas that are subjected to a greater depth of review bcsed upon direction from outside parties such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,' Consumers Power Company, etc.
O
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
]
/ PI 3201. 012
SUBJECT:
Scope Change Requests Midland Independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 3 of 9 _
v g 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES AND APPROVAL 2.1 The technical reviewers are responsible for promptly notifying the appropriate lead technical reviewer should they discover an area of program scope requiring modification.
2.2 The lead technical reviewers shall continually monitor the technical activities under their direction and compare the activities necessary to achieve project objectives against those activities which have been previously planned. Upon determination that additional activities are needed to achieve project objectives, the lead technical reviewer shall document the additional activities on a Scope Change Request (SCR) form (Attachment 1) and associated data on a Cost and Schedule Considerations l (CSC) form (Attachment 2).
2.3 The project manager shall review all SCR and CSC forms and determine whether the proposed scope change is appropriate and if adequate justification has been provided. .
l He may send the SCRs and CSCs back to the lead technical reviewers for clarification or additional detail. If satisfied that the scope change is oppropriate and that justification has been documented in accordance with this instruction, the Project Manager shcIl sign the SCRs and CSCs signifying his approval and forward these to the Principal-in-Charge. Upon opproval by the Principol-in-Charge, the Project Manager shcIl forward the SCRs and CSCs to Consumers Power Company.
tb v
l
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O Pl_320 0 012 sus;scr: Scepe Cheege Re,eests Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program APPROVED BY:
4 g PREPARED BY:g j l<;
m 2.4 The Principol-in-Charge shall conduct a similar review as 2.3 obove for all SCRs and CSCs forwarded to him by the Project Manager. If he is satisfied
_ with the Project Manager's recommendation, he shall sign the SCRs and CSCs signifying his approval and direction to forward these to Consumers Power Company.
2.5 The Project Manager shall provide appropriate notification of scope, cost, and schedule changes to Consumers Power Company in accordance with contract provisions. If required by other project procedures, the Project Manager shall notify other parties, such as the NRC, of scope changes.
3.0 PREPARATION The following instructions shall be used to document changes in scope and
- factors offecting cost and schedule.
3.1 Identification and Documentation of Scope Chances 3.1.1 Upon ddermination that additional activities are needed to achieve project objectives, the lead technical reviewer responsible for the review activity shall document tne additional activities on a Scope Change Request form (Attachment I).
3.1.2 The lead technical reviewer shall utilize the criteria documented in
! Section 1.3 of this instruction in making his recommendation for o scope change.
O l
l
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O' "'- 3 2 ' - 12 sua;ect: Scepe Chenge Requests Midland independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
PAGE 5 of 9 y s- ,
s 3.l.3 The following information is required to be documented on the Scope Change Request form in a complete manner such that individuals not associated with the project con understand the bases for the scope change.
- 3. l.3.1 Number Each scope change shall have a unique identification number. This control number shall be specified in accordance with the procedures documented in Section 4.2 of this project instruction.
O 3.1.3.2 System /IDCV Topic 1/
The system name end the IDCV topic shall be listed. The IDCV topics shall be obtained from the appropriate matrix in PI-3201-009, Engineering Program Plen, and shall include both the name and topic number (if applicable) l defined in PI-3201-009.
l 3.l.3.3 Review Activity 2_(
The review activity for which the scope is changing shall be identified.
I l
1/ Scope changes related to administrative or contractual matters shall be identified by indicating " Administrative" or " Contractual" in this location on the form.
2_/ For administrative or contractual matters, indicate the activity for
, which the scope change has been identified.
L 1
l
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O ei-3zoi - oiz sus;ect: Scene Cheese Reneests Midland Independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program . .
PREPARED BY PW 6 d q APPROVED BY:q l]
3.1.3.4 Description of increase in Scooe
. The technical activities which will be performed if the scope change is approved shall be listed. The description shall be sufficiently complete to allow the Project Manager and the Principal-in-Charge to evaluate the need for the described activities.
3.1.3.S Basis or Cause of increase The lead technical reviewer shall explain why the scope O imereese is mecesecrx Tsis ex9iemetiem s8eii reiete 18e additional activities to the engineering program plan.
l 3.1.4 Upon reviewing the completed SCRs and CSCs and obtaining clarification, the Project Manager may add his comments and recommendations for disposition in the space provided for
~
" Comments by PM" on each form. The Principal-in-Charge shall also add his comments as appropriate in the space provided for
" Comments by PIC".
3.2 Documentation of Cost and Schedule Considerations 3.2.1 For each Scope Change Request, a Cost and Schedule Considerations form (Attachment 2) shall be completed by the lead technical reviewer.
l lO I
(
i PROJECT INSTRUCTION Q PI 3201. 012
SUBJECT:
Scope Change Requests Midland independent Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program 7 MENED W: MWED E PAGE og 9 l W l
3.2.2 The lead technical reviewer shall enter in the upper right corner of the Cost and Schedule Considerations form the Scope Chcnge
. Request number to which it applies.
3.2.3 A single scope change may consist of several individual tasks or cost elements (e.g., travel or other dire.ct costs may be cpplicable).
3.2.4 Each task or cost element shall be listed on the Cost and Schedule Considerations forms along with the associated cost, subproject identification number, and projected completion date.
3.2.S The lead technical reviewer may group activities as he deems appropriate within a single task, but should retain the assumptions I
which were used in the estimate of increased cost.
3.3 Documentation of Scope Decreases in the event that a planned activity proves unnecesscry or a Scope Change Request previously approved by CPC is no longer needed, the appropriate lead technical reviewer shall follow the obove procedure to delete the scope. Costs shown on the Cost and Schedule Considerations form shcil be shown in parentheses to indicate a negative. A lead technical reviewer may withdraw a Scope Change Request at any time prior to submittal to CPC by verbal notification to the Project Manager. The Project Manager shall note the cancellation of the Scope Change Request in his log of scope l changes.
O
PROJECT INSTRUCTION O ei-moi. 0,2 sus;ect: Scepe Chenge Reqees1s Midland independen; Design and REV.: 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program p 8 d 9 PREPARED BY.
s Q .
APPROVED BY:g ]
4.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL l
4.1 Upon completion of the Scope Change Request form and its associated Cost and Schedule Considerations form, the lead technical reviewer shall sign the Scope Change Request and forward it to the Project Manager.
4.2 Each Scope Change Request form cnd its associated Cost and Schedule Considerations form shall have a unique identification resmber consisting of the subject file number (3201-012) followed by the lead technical reviewer's initials and a sequential three digit number (001 thru 999). For example:
O 4.3 The Project Monoger or his designee shall maintain an oppropriate log of Scope Change Requests which he has received and their status. The dates of budget approval and receipt of contract change notice shcIl be entered cnto the Cost and Schedule Considerations form by the Project Manager when received from Consumers Power Company.
S.0 INITIATION OF ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES S.I Additional scope items described in Scope Chonge Requests shall not be initiated without the approval of the Project Manager and Principal-in-Charge. Where a lead technical reviewer believes that there are compelling reasons for initiating such new scope items prior to budget opproval by CPC, he shall request authorization to proceed from the Project Manager and Principal-in-Charge. Reasons for requesting such i
outhorization may include inefficiencies which would reruit from waiting (O
a t
PROJECT INSTRUCTION l PI-3201 012
SUBJECT:
scope Change Requests Midland independent Design and REW 0 DATE: 4/4/83 Construction Verification Program PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY PAGE 9 of 9 I
for opproval from CPC, the need to complete evoluctions prior to meetings with the NRC, and the need to provide input to other reviewers in a timely manner.
. O l
l l
l
_-_-_ - ..- . _- .- . . . . _ -. - .. . . . . = .
i l
O ATTACHMENTI j
MIDLAW IDCV SCOPE CHANGE REQUEST 1 Number System /lDCV Topic Review Activity Description of increase in Scope i
Basis or Cause of increase Comments By PM Comments By PIC 1
initiating LTR Date Project Manager Approval Date O errecigei-re-Csers Aggrovei Dose
ATTACHMENT 2 l i MIDLAto IDCV SCOPE CHANGE REQUEST ,
COST APO SCEDULE CONSIDERATIONS 4
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL COST AND SCHEDULE CHANGES:
Projected increased Subproject Date of Task Cost ($) Assignment Completion O
l Total Comments by PM l
Comments by PIC O
CPC Authorization Date Contract Modification Date
-~
. - , ._-=- ._,.....--._-
i 1
0 -
t APPENDlX C RESUMES O -
O TERA CORPORATION
I O
ROBERT W. FELTON '
Executive Vice President Education M.S. Nuclear Engineering, University of Washington .
B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University Summary of Experience Mr. Felton is o founding member of TERA Corporation and has been Executive Vice President since TERA's inception. As Executive Vice President he hos operational responsibility for the firm. He also provides project rnonagement, supervision and client interface for some of TERA's larger projects. His extensive experience includes the management and administration of design, licensing, and procurement efforts on large energy-related facilities. Mr. Felton hos also been responsible for projects decling with the design and implementation of information and management systems, including computerized systems for on-line performance of a variety of administrative and security tasks. In addition, Mr. Felton has supervised TERA projects involving environmental impacts, engineering criteria and licensing at local, state and federal levels, quality
. assurance programs and nuclear services.
1974 - Present Executive Vice President - TERA Corporation. Mr. Felton has opero-tional responsibility for the firm, including the supervision of the man-CJ security systems development and implementation; environmental im-poet projects; and the development of engineering criterio, specifi-cations, and licensing data for fossil and nuclear projects.
1973-1974 Manager of Environmental and Inforrnation Management Services, Tek-nekron, Inc. Responsible for marketing and monoging the firm's compre-hensive and computer-based site selection octivities and the review of project control systems.
1971 - 1972 Prior to joining TERA, as manager of Kaiser Engineers Licensing Ser-vices, Mr. Felton supervised a project group of 26 engineers and scien-tists. He was responsible for marketing and performing the licensing services provided by that stoff.
Mr. Felton personally designed and developed Kaiser Engineers' com-poterized nuclear power piant licensing and data bank program.
1962 - 1970 Mr. Felton served in the navy as a nuclear submarine officer. He was o qualified nuclear engineer and served as nuclear material officer for Commander, Submarine Forces Pocific (COMSUB PAC).
Awards Awarded on Atomic Energy Commission Special Fellowship in Nuclear Engineering by University of Washington.
O 10/82(1)
TERACORPORATION
~y ,- ,- --
.rw - - - ~ , --,,,--,,e- , , - - - - - - nm , , , - ,, ,- -- , - - ~
O -
ROBERT W. FELTON Page 2 Awards (Cont'd)
Received a U.S. Navy Commendation for superior performance of duty while serving as Material Officer for Poloris Submarine os Comrnander, Submarine Force Pacific Staff.
Registrations Registered Professional Engineer - Nuclear Engineering, California Professional Affiliotions American Society of Mechanical Engineers American Nuclear Society American Monogement Association O
e O
10/82(l)
TERACORPORATION
~ = -
,, ,w - - - -.... . , , _ _ . , _ . _ , _ _ _ , ___ ,_ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1 l
O LAWRENCE H. WIGHT Vice President - Engineering Analysis Education Graduate Studies, Geophysics, University of Washington M.S. Engineering Mechanics, Penn State University B.S. Engineering Management, Boston University Summary of Experience Mr. Wight has over 15 years of engineering experience ranging from geotechnical engineering to civil engineering and engineering management. He hos worked extensively in the areas of seismic hozord onelysis, geophysical instrumentation, enhanced oil recovery, orctic geophysics, seismic monitoring, and earthquake engineering of structures.
He has managed major seismic hozord projects and has been principal investigotor for several projects addressing the earthquake response of structures. Mr. Wight has published articles on various geophysical and seismological topics. He otso has tought civil engineering and geophysics at several universities.
1979 - Present Vice President - Engineering Analysis, TERA Corporation. Responsible for the coordination and management of the firm's efforts in the crecs of geotechnical engineering, structure reliability, and system safety anal-ysis.
! O 1976 - 1979 Director, Geotechnical Engineering, TERA Corporation. Project Direc-for on major projects assessing the seismic hozord at 35 different sites l
cround the United States. Project Monoger on projects evoluoting the seismic safety at six p!vtonium facilities in the U.S. and several reactor sites. Serving on on Expert Panel representing seismology fw the Battelle Pacific Northwest Laborotory. Participent in several critical facility siting studies.
1972 - 1976 Geotechnical Engineer, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. Principal in-vestigator for a soll-structure interaction research project and co-investigator for a seismic design basis project. Contributed to many other projects that evoluoted seismic scrom techniques and methods for seismic onelysis of nuclear fuel reprocessing plants and nuclear reactor physical security. Also supervised all geological end seismological studies necessory for the preparation of Safety Analysis Reports for the Laboratory's critical facilities.
1969 - 1971 University Instructor. Instructor in the Civil Engineering Department of l the Middle Ecst Technical University in Turkey and helped develop its earthquake engineering laboratory. Tought moth, physics, and geo-physics at the Caribbean Meteorologicci institute of the University of the West Indies.
10/82(1)
!O .
TERA CORPORATI.ON
~~
O LAWRENCE H. WIGHT Page Two 1967 - 1969 Mechanical Engineer, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. Worked with 'o 9eophysics group studying theoretical and experimental problems in nuclear seismology. Responsible for siting, maintaining, and interpreting data from several seismic stations.
Mr. Wight is the author of numerous scientific publications; o complete list will be furnished upon request.
Professional Associations Member, American Geophysical Union Member, Seismological Society of Americo Member, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Member, American Society for the Advancement of Science O
l 10/82(l)
O .
TERACORPORATION
I JOHN W. BECK Vice President - Southern / Southwestern Operations Education M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Northeastern, University B.S. Engineering Physics, University of Tulso Summary of Experience Mr. Beck has extensive experience in technical and corporate management. He hos managed projects and engineering support activities in the creas of fuel mcnagement and procurement, power plant licensing, environmental systems, electrical and mechanical engineering, reactor physics and nuclear safety cnolysis. His corporate management experience was os the Chief Operating Officer of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation which owns and operates a S2S MWe nuclear generating station. He otso served as Chairman of the EPRI Nuctecr Engineering and Operations Task Force end as o member of the Nuclear Divisional Committee of EPRI.
1980 - Present Vice President, TERA Corporation. Responsible for the Southern cnd Southwestern Operations of the company.
1976 - 1980 Executive Vice President, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation.
Served as the Chief Operating Officer of the company and was respon-gm sible for the technical and business management of the corporation. The
- \ output of the nuclear plant is sold wholesale to its owners,10 New England electric utilities.
1974 - 1976 Director of Engineering, Yonkee Atomic Electric Compcny. Responsible for the general supervision and management of the Plant, Reactor, and Environmental Engineering Department es well as research cnd engi-neering development and computer opplications for the company.
1973 - 1974 Reactor Engineering Monoger, Yonkee Atomic Electric Compcny.
Direct responsibility for fuel management, transient and safety analyses for the Yankee Rowe, Vermont Yunkee, Moine Yankee, Seabrook and New Engicnd Electric System nuclear installations.
1967 - 1973 Engireer/ Licensing Engineer, Yonkee Atomic. Reload core physics
- design and analysis for operating plants and nuclecr design follow for I new plants. Licensing engineer for Moine Yankee.
1964 - 1967 Scientist, Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory. Experimental reactor physics and analysis for the Shippingport and Light Water Breeder core physics design.
Professional Associations American Nuclear Society G
b 10/82(l)
TERA CORPORATION
HOWARD A. LEVIN Project Manager Education M.S. Structural Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology B.E. Civil Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology j Summary of Experience 1
Mr. Levin has over nine years of experience in the commercial nuclear field with emphasis in nuclear plant design and construction, operating reactor safety, licensing, project management, and federal regulation.
1981 - Present Project Manager - TERA Corporation. Responsible for the management and implementation of large projects servicing clients in the auclear services creo.
1976 - 1981 Technical Assistant to the Director, Division of Engineering, NRC.
Responsible for the development of policies and programs related to the technical review of license opplications and operating reactor safety.
l Administered technical activities in the creas of mechanical, equipment qualification, structural, materials, c!+mical, hydrological, geotecnnical, earthquake and environmental enginering. Represented the Director o
V and provided testimony before the N9C, AGRS, ASLB, public hearings and industry meetings, presenting and Wstifying technical analyses and evoluotions.
Program Manager, Sy3tematic Evoluotion Program-NRC. Responsible for the development of program goals, scope, technical criteria and l scheduling for the SEP structural, mechanical, and seismic safety review of older operating reactors. Responsibilities included the administration and monogement of large dollar resources and multi-discipfined engi-neering professionals. Developed new and innovatise procedures for seismic safety cssessment.
Senior Engineer, NRC. Responsible for the review of Safety Analysis Report infortnation pertaining to complex structural, mechanical oud materials issues related to all operating power and research reactor facilities. Coordination of technical assistance programs; preparation of licensing criterio documents, codes and standards; documentation and presentation of safety analyses and evoluotions supporting licensing actions.
1974 - 1976 Structural Engineer, Stone and Webster Engineering Corp. Responsible for the analysis and design of nuclear power plant structures, systems and components for normal and extreme loading conditions. Emphasis on dynamic analysis and pmputer code devr.lopment to solve problems related to nuolification for seismic and pipe rupture foodings. Developed new design concepts for prestressed concre,te containment buildings.
O 3/83(3)
TERA CORPORATION
HOWARD A. LEVIN Page 2 1972 - 1974 Held engineering positions with Slottery Associates and Hercules, Inc.
Responsible for design of structural systems used in construction of bridges, subways, sewage plants, and process chemical plants. In charge of field surveying team. ,
i Professional Affiliation -
American Society of Civil Engineers l
Honors and Publications Sigma Xi Scientific Honorary -
Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honorary M.I.T. Engineering Resident Fellowship U.S. Naval Academy Appointment
- Moles Heavy Construction Award t
i Selected Technical papers and Publications:
Prestressed Concrete Containments for Nuclear Power Plants, Operating i
O Experience with Snubbers; Fracture Toughness and Lomellear Teoring of Component Supports; Equipment Hesponse at the El Centro Steam Plant During the October IS,1979, Imperial Valley Earthquake; Seismic Review of Operoting Plants, Systematic Evaluation Program Seismic Review; Evoluotion of Existing Nuclear Power P, font Facilities for Postulated Heavy Load Drop Consequences; Seismic Design Guidelines for Existing Nuclear Power Facili-ties in Light of an Expanding Data Base of Knowledge.
f t
O 3/83(3)
TERA CORPCRATION
WILLIAM J. HALL Principal Scientist Education Ph.D. Civil Engineering, University of Illinois M.S. Civil Engineering, University of Illinois B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Konsos University of California, Berkeley l
Summary of Experience Dr.Holl has had over 39 years of experience in the fields of structural engineering, structural mechanics and dynamics, soil mechanics, earthquake engineering, plasticity, fatigue, fracture mechanics, nuclear power, and civil defense including 33 years on the faculty of the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Illinois. He is author or co-author of over 115 formal publicottons (books and professional articles) and over 150 major consulting reports, many of public record and wide distribution. He is editor for o series of texts in civil engineering and engineering mechanics for Prentice-Hall, Inc. On his own and as on associate of the late Nothon M.Newmork, he has corried major consulting engineering responsibility for projects in such creas os development of design criteria for hardened protective structures, physical vulnerobility studies, vibration studies of missile test stands, reactor containment structural design and analysis, nuclear s field test studies, review of structural criteria and designs for nuclear power plants and equipment for seismic loadings, M-X system development, and the trans-Alaska pipeline
'.. design.
l Professionc! Affiliations 1
American Society of Civil Engineers, Fellow, officer of local section and numerous committees American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fellow Earthquake Engineering Research Institute - post Director American Concrete institute I American Society of Engineering Edu otors l International Institute of Welding Seismological Society of Americo American Society for Testing and Materials Society for Experimental Stress Analysis International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Illinois Society of Professional Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers l Structural Engineers Association of Illinois l Applied Technology Council
- National Science Foundation Advisory Committee on Earthquake Encineering l
Honors O Who s W8o in America Who's Who in Engineering Who's Who in the Midwest Who's Who in Metals TERA CORPORATION
O WILLI AM J. HALL Page 2 Personalities of the West and M:dwest ,
American Men of Science Engineers of Distinction A.Epstein Memorial Award Walter L.Huber ASCE Research Award Adams Memorici Award of the AWS i
Holliburton Engineering Education Leadership Award of the University of Illinois College of Engineering National Academy of Engineering U.S. Delegation on Earthquake Engineering and Hazards Reduction to People's Republic of Chino, National Academy of Sciences Tau Beta Pi Sigma Tou Phi Koppo Phi Sigma Xi Chi Epsilon O
l ..
TERA CORPORATION
DONALD K. DAVIS !
Manager - Nuclear Sofety and Licensing Education j B.S. Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University :
Graduate Numerical Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University Studies Summary of Experience !
Mr. Davis has 15 years of nuclear engineering experience. He has managed licensing i
programs for the NRC and hos performed safety analyses for commercloi power plants.
He hcs directed multiple discipline engineering groups evoluoting the design aspects of commercial power plants including potential site hozords such as earthquakes and floods, structural and mechanical design, electrical engineering, system performance and reactor core occident onalysis. He is on expert in nuclear licensing issues from o policy and engineering viewpoint. At TERA Mr. Davis has been the Project Manager for two key projects related to the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant; the performance of Seismih Design Studies to verify the safety design basis of the plant and the development of on Earthquake Emergency Plan to address the potential effects of an earthquake on emergency planning activities.
i 1979 - Present Monoger - Nuclear Sofety and Licensing, TERA Corporation.
.O i 972 - i,7, Chief. Systematic Evoieotion e,og,om B, onch, NRC. Res,onsibie fo, the safety evoluotion of II older power plants in over 130 t=chnical Issues from seismic design to occident analyses.
l Chief, Operating Reactor Project Branch, NRC. Responsible for the licensing activities associated with 15 power reactors.
Technical Assistant, Division of Operating Reactors, NRC. Provided technical direction to the licensing staff evoluoting operating reactors.
Technical Support Section Leader, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulo-tion. Provided technical assistance and advice on policy issues to the Director and Deputy Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Project Monoger, Light Water Reactors, AEC. Responsible for the licensing of nuclear power reactors for construction and operation.
1967 - 1972 Reactor Engineer, Hittman Associates. Responsible for the design and safety onalyses of several nuclear power plants and spent fuel shipping l containers. Conducted analyses of primary and secondary system transients and loss-of-coolant occident analyses for several power reoc-for designs.
1964 - 1967 Research Assistant, North Carolina State University. Responsible for dosimetry research associated with 10 kilowatt research reactor and 30,000 Curie Cobolt-60 Irrodiator.
O TERA CORPORATION
, _ _ . _ . - _ . . _ _ _ . - . . . _ _ _ . _ _ .. _ ~ -. _ --__ _. . .___ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _
l l
t O oo"^'o x o^vis Pese 2 Professionc! Affiliations and Honors American Society of Mechanical Engineers Tou Beta Pi, Engineering Honorary i Sigma Pi Sigma, Physics Honorary
- Phi Kappa Phi, Academic Honorary O
I l O.
l O
l TERA CORPORATION
O ROBERT L. WILSON Senior Vice President Education M.S. Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University B.S. Aeronautical Engk.eering, Purdue University Summary of Experience Mr. Wilson has extensive experience . management of engineering, environmental and licensing activities for poa olonte, mhing projects and chemical industry projects. He has mmoged numerous pojects involving the design of various power plant systems and studies of environmental impoets os a result of plant or mine operations. He has directed numerous management consulting projects for TERA ranging from development of Project Control Systems to Corporate Organizational Planning and Development projects.
1979 - Present Senior Vice President, TERA Corporation. Responsible for three divi-sions of the firm providing environmental engineering, seismic cnolysis and management consulting services.
1974 - 1979 Vice President and Division Monoger, TERA Corporation. Responsible for monoging multi-disciplined pojects including lignite mining studies, O environmental assessments, project management services, waste hand-ling evoluotion, nuclear rodiological ossessments, emergency /
contingency planning, facilities licensing services, and computer i
opplications projects.
1969 - 1974 Socromento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Supervisor of Nuclear Engineering. Full responsibility for nuclear engineering, environmental assessment, and federal, state, and local licensing activities for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Project. Responsibility for administration of the NSSS contract for Rancho Seco Unit.
1966 - 1969 Plant Engineer, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory 0<APL). Responsible for management of operation and testing octivities for o nuclear power plant facility.
Professional Affiliations Professional Engineer, Nuclear Engineering, State of Collfornia Member, American Nuclear Society; member of Executive Committee of Reactor Operations Division Member, Northern California Section, American Nuclear Society; post Chairman and member of the Executive Committee Co-founder and Chairman of the Utilities Nuclear Cootings Work Committee, o national organization with membership from all segments of the nuclear industry, currently representing over 80 countries.
TERA CORPORATION
O FRAN< A. DOUGHERTY Project Monoger Education M.ENA. (Alversity of Chicago M.S. Nclear Engineering, Georgio Institute of Technology B.S. Chemistry, Illinois institute of Technology Summary of Experience Mr. Dougherty has more than 14 yects of experience in the nuclear power industry. He has monoged numerous projects for utility and orchitect-engineer clients including licensing, quality assurance, design review, and design engineering tasks. The plants for which these sei ices were provided include both BWRs and PWRs ranging from the pre-PSAR stage through backfit modification for operating plants. Among his more recent .
projects have been the evoluotion of the QA program and implementing procedures for a utility, the performance of a design evoluotion for on architect. engineer, and the management of a project involving backfit modifications during on outoge.
1982 - Present Project Monoger, TERA Corporation.
1973 - 1982 Monoger, ProIect Monogement Division, EDS Nuclear. Responsible for all major projects in the western region including engineering design and analysis, GA, licensing, and design reviews. Directed a staff of project O - ar>~8=-r r aai6i<r=aci'icar1c'-
Monoger, Utility Services, EDS Nuclet . Directed non-nuclear work in the creos of project monogement, environmental services, cnd monoge-ment consulting. Projects included pipelines and fossil-fired power plants.
Manager, Nuclear Systems Division, EDS Nuclear. Directed plant safety evoluotions, prepared system design criterio, monoged design review projects, and developed QA programs.
Supervising Engineer, Nuclear Systems Division, EDS Nuclear. Wrote and reviewed PSARs, FSARs, and ERs, performed safety analyses, wrote '.
QA procedures, developed licensing strategies, evoluoted NSSS bids.
1968 - 1973 Mechanical Engineer, Sorgent & Lundy. Responsible for A-E interface with NSSS vendor, developed system designs, wrote PSARs, wrote specifications, evolvoted bids.
Nuclear Analyst, Sorgent & Lundy. Performed safety evoluotions and dose calculations, performed numerous economics studies, onelyzed fuel supply options, developed computer programs for economic analysis.
l 10/82(l) l %
TERACORPORATION
..,--..-,,._-.-___,_-..,,,,m. - - _ , - , - - - . . , , . - , , , . ~ , - - - , . , , , , .
FRANK A.DOUGHERTY Page Two Professional Affiliations and Honon American Management Association American Nuclear Society ANS 3 Committee (Operations)
ANS 59 Subcommittee (Diesel-generators)
American Chemical Society, Midwestern Section,
, Undergraduate Research Award Professional Licenses Professional Engineer, California, NU-0021 O
)--
i O 10/82(1)
TERACORPORATION
Q RICHARD P. SNAIDER Senior Systems Engineer Education B.S. Systems Engineering, U.S. Noval Academy M.B.A. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Summary Of Experience Mr.Snaider has fifteen years of experience in nuclear power, nine years of which have been in the commercloi nuclear field with emphosts on operation, maintenance, and design, particularly as opplied to operating reactor safety and licensing.
1982 - Present Senior Systems Engineer - TERA Corporation. Hos porticipated in several projects related to key technical issues, such cs fire protection, the control of heavy loods, and commitment tracking. Porticular emphasis has been in the area of nuclear plant system design and operation.
1975 - 1981 Senior Project Manager, Operating Reactors, Division of Licensing, NRC. Responsible for monoging and performing review of licensing issues for operating nuclear power piants. Assisted in developing Commission policy regarding relaxation of licensing requirements on older and smaller power reactors.
Task Manager, Unresolved Safety issues Program, NRC. Assigned O r a a idiii*v rar d i ai=9 a - a sias ar sr -> < r r two safety issues, related to BWR Nozzle Crocking and Fracture ivti <
Toughness of Component Supports in PWRs.
Senior Mechanical Systems Engineer, Systematic Evoluotion Program, NRC. Responsible for safe shutdown reviews on the three Mk.I BWRs included Ir3 the program. Also assisted in reviews regarding the qualificotton of equipment to withstand post-accident harsh environ-ments, as well as materials and mechanical topics.
1973 - 1975 Project Engineer, Generation Engineering Department - Jersey Centrol Power & Light Company. Served as JCP&L coordinator, with General Public Utilities Service Corporation and Burns and Roe 3 Inc., on large i facility modification involving design and construction of new liquid, solid, and gaseous rodwoste treatment facilities for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Plant. . Responsible for selection, purchase, and installation of a system to treat chremated wastewater from the Oyster Creek forus. Served as on assistant to the Oyster Creek Maintenance
' Engineer during refueling outages, supervising seven crews of personnel in the occomplishment of assigned tasks on plant safety systems, auxiliary systems, and turbine systems.
1966 - 1973 Officer, U.S. Ncvy Served aboard three submarines in positions of increasing responsibility, including two department head tours. Awarded Navy Commendation Medal and Navy Achievement Medal, among others.
O er r >i e i ^"iii *i a American Nuclear Society 10/20/82 TERA CORPORATION
l I
LIOPEL D. BATES, P.E.
, Principal Associate Engineer EDUCATION
' Groducte Westinghouse Nuclear Plant Engineering School M.S. Mechanico! Engineering, Bringham Young University B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Bringham Young University
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Bates hos extensive experience in the design, manufacture and test of instrumentatien and control systems for nuclear power plants.
1981 - Present Principal Engineer. Provides expertise in reviews involving nuclear plant electrical, instrumentation and control systems.
1977-1981 System Design Group Manager - NUTECH. Directed the activities of electrical, Instrumentation and control engineers in the design of safety-related systems for nuclear power plants. These systems
, incicded safety relief volve monitoring, containment temperature '
, monitoring, post-occident sampling, emergency power sys^ ems, hydrogen recombiner control and other similar. plant electrical, instrumentation and control (l&C) systems. Mr. Bates also directed O octivit*es in the oreo of equippment qualificotton Ir;cluding the development of "Q" lists, evoluotion of quellficotton status and the development of qualification programs for Class IE equipment.
As a Senior Engineer at Nutech, Mr. Bates has lead technical responsibility for modifientions to I&C systems for Susquehanno I, Laguno Verde, Fermi 2 and LoSolle 1. These modifications were made to the NSSS systems and included testability, safety relief volve control and over thirty (30) others of varying scope and complexity.
1973-1977 Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Idaho National Engineering Lob While employed by Westinghouse Electric at the Naval Reactor Facility (NRF), Mr. Bates quellfled as Engineering Officer of the Watch (EOOW) of the AlW Prototype. He also qualified and functioned as Nuclear Plant Engineer (NPE), and Emergency Director. His responsibilities of NRF were of the management level for the operation and maintenance of the reactor plant, and for the training of nuclear novy personnel. While at NRF, Mr. Bates porticipated in numerous plant start-ups, shutdowns, obnormal events / transients, and site emergencies (octual and training drills).
1972-1973 Associate Engineer - San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
Responsible for the forecast!ng of gas supply and demand, and for i
the economic Justification of projects involving gas transmission and storage.
TER4 CORPORATION
l l
i i
j MARTIN B. JONES, JR.
- I Senior Project Monoger Education B.S.E.E. The Citadel, Charleston, South Carolino ,
Summary of Experience During Mr Jones' twenty-two years of responsible experience in the electric utility industry, he has directed and participated in o number of major plant construction projects built by both union and non-union contractors. He has also had direct responsibility for the development and implementation of quality control, warehousing and
. records monogement progroms and systems. ,
1980 Senior Project Monoger, TERA Corporation.
1975 - 1980 Manager of Construction, South Carolino Electric & Gas Co. Mr. Jones was responsible for all major company construction activities. Among his primary responsibilities with S.C.E.&G.CO. were the $200 million Folrfield Pumped Storage Focility (8 60MW units; completed in 1978) and the $800 million Summer Station (scheduled for completion in 1981). ,
1973 - 1975 Quality Control Manager, S.C.E.&G.CO. Mr. Jones esioblished and l
organized n quality control group within the Constructicn Depcrtment for the construction of V.C. Summer Unit I (960MW PWR). He was responsible for hiring and training inspectors, warehousemen and records i- " d i a d ==d imai = ' d 's i itt i <==ii'r c tr >.
' O a r>
warehousing and records monogement systems for the Summer Project.
Senior Construction Supervisor, S.C.E.&G.CO. Mr. Jones organized o 1969 - 1973 He directed the
- Construction Department electrical startup group.
check-out and startup of Wateree Units I & 2 (350 MW-cool) cnd Williams I(650MW-heavy oil). He was also responsible for check-out of Saludo Hydro Unit 5, a 75MW expansion of on existing plant.
1963 - 1969 I&E Engineer, Project Engineer, Carolinos Virginia Nuclear Power Association, Inc. Mr. Jones was engaged in a federolly funded R&D
- program during operation of the prototype plant (CVTR). He was also in charge of an 18-month program on containment teokoge and simulated steam-break occidents following shut-down. Mr. Jones was engaged in a responsible role in decomissioning this plant.
1963 South Carolino industries. Mr. Jones participated in the startup of a Kroft Paper Mill in Florence, South Carolino.
1959 - 1963 Staff Electrical Engineer, Plant instrument Supervisor, Carolinos Virginio Nuclear Power Association. Mr. Jones was involved in design.-
Ing, building and operating a prototype nuclear power plant of Porr, South Carolino.
1958 - 1959 Assistant Electrical Superintendent, South Carolino Electric & Gas Company. Mr. Jor.es participated in the construction of two 125MW cool
<ir d it -
O 4
TERA CORPORATION
4'% g d
CHARLES E. LEMON Manager - Quality Assurance ,
Education B.S. Mechanico! Engineeiing, University of Idaho Summary of Experience Mr. Lemon has over eight years of supervisory and technical experience in nuclear and fossil fueled power plant engineering, quality assurance, licensing, environmental studies 3
and computer systems application. At present, he performs quality assurance functions for TERA = nuclear safety functions, including review of project GA plans and performance
- .of oudits. In addition, he is responsible for the system design of the NRC Document Control System Project. He has assisted in the design and implementation of Automated Records Management Systems for three nuclear power plant projects, including computer sof tware for document inexing and microgtgehics systems.
1976 - Present Manager - Ovality Assurance, implementation nf TERA quality assurance program, development of QA procedures, rerlow of project GA plans, and ouditing of QA octivities.!!n addition, responsible for the design and implementation of user oriented records and information monogement systems for nuclear projects. Specic! emp5csis in computer .
Indexing systems for nucleo power plant GA/QC records and documen- '
fation. - -
1974 - 1976 Project Monoger - Power Engineering, TERA Corporation. Responsible for the preparation of capital cost and capability models for fossil and O nuclear fue. led power plants. Performed technical and economic evoluo-tions of the impoet of thermal effluent limitations on stcom electric power plants for the National Commission on Wcter Quality. s 1973 - 1974 Mechanical Group Quo!!ty Engineering Coordinator, Bechtcl. Respon-sible for review and opproval of vendor QA/QC makvals, and preparation ,
and implementation of group QA/QC effort with project and corporate QA/QC program. ,
1970 - 1973 Engineer, Bechtel. Responsible for the design and precuremen't of mechanical draft cooling tower system for conversion of existing open cycle circulating water system to closed cycle circulating,woter system for on 800 MWe PWR. System design and equipment procurement for Bolonce of Plant thermo! cycle systems for two unit I100 MWe SWR.
System design and equipment procurement for gaseous rodweste lystem, fuel pool cooling and cleonup systems and containment atmospheric J control systems.
m Registrations Registered Professional Engineer - Nuclear Engineering, Californio Registered Professional Engineer - Mechanico! Engineering, Collfornia Professiono! Associations American Society of Mechanical Engineers O Nationo! Society of Professione: Engineers Collfornia Society of Professional Engineers National Micrographics Association l
. . - - _ - ===
4 MARK W. POLIT'^
- Quality Assurance Ergineer Education B.A. Philosophy, Rockford College, Rockford, til Post graduate study in Organizational Group Dynamics of Rimfoxe, Copenhagen, Denmark Summary of Experience . -
s- M; Mr. Pollt has monoged the QA of major projects and assisted in the design and implementation of corporate Gvolity Assurance plans and procedures of TERA. He further reviews project-;GA plans and audits quality assured activities. For the l
Engineering Analysis of, TERA, he hos designed and implemented programs which control the quality.and flow of work re'oted to the seismic design of nuclear power plants, os well as assisting in the orgcnization and supervision of complex tasks. Mr. Polit hos given technical and superytsory support to many projects involving earthquake hozord and strong motion studies for nuplear facilities.
1979 - Present Supervisor Quality Assured Activities, Engineering Analysis, TERA Cor-l poration. Design and implement the Division's organizational concepts i relating to Qvolity Control. Responsible for the implementation of project GA plans involving the management and surveillance of quality
' assured octivities.
O As o quality assurance engineer, ossist in the development and imple-mentation of corporate QA procedures. Review project GA plans and
. . _ Jouditing of QA activities. Responsibilities also include the organization and supervisien of major tasks and projects relating to the seismic
'hazord at many nuclear facilities.
. s -
-Supirvise the collection, organization and documentation of a large scismiidata base used as the design basis for nuclear plants. Respon-sible for QA/QC of dato.
w ,
C
- e N
~ x
- ,.V
'\ g v.
ne--
10/82(l)
" ~
g TERA CORPORATION J 'g . 4 ,
, ,w w c-,-3 +m wy -
,9- .*W ,-----W%,-e-r-r #---v
O -
JOSEPH A.MARTORE Senior Engineering Mechanics Engineer EDUCATION M.S. Civil Engineering, Mossochusetts Institute cf Technology B.S. Civil Engineering, Mossochusetts institute of Technology M.B.A. Candidate George Washington University
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE .
Mr. Mortore has over eight years of engineering experience, with on emphasis on nuclear power plant design, construction, and licensing. At the NRC he managed the safety and environmental reviews for operating license applications, and performed technical reviews and evoluotions of operating reactor safety issues. He has oiso had leod responsibility for the structural, mechanical, seismic, and occident onelysis and design of nuclear plant facilities.
1981 - Present Senior Engineering Mechanics Engineer - TERA Corporation 1979 - 1981 Technical Assistant to the Director, Division of Licensing, NRC.
Coordinated and reviewed the technical and project management efforts
' related to the licensing and safe operation of nuclear plants. Provided presentations of a variety of technical and safety matters for Congres-O sional, Commission, ASLB, ACRS, and industry meetings.
Licensing Project Manager, NRC. Monoged and participated in the safety and environmental review and evoluotion of applications for operating licenses.
Structuro! Engineer, NRC. Responsible for the review, onelysis, and evoluotion of structural, mechanical, and seismic safety issues for operating nuclear facilities. Evoluoted crid recommended design cri-terio, octed as the principal NRC witness on these issues of public hearings and before ACRS, participated in the NRC sponsored research octivities, and monoged technical assistance programs.
1976 - 1979 Structural Engineer, Stone and Webster Corporation. Responsible for the onalysis and design of nuclear power plant $tructures, systems and l components. Emphasis on soil-structure interaction and seismic engi-neering.
l 1973 - 1976 Field Engineer, North East Post-tensioning Consultants, Inc. Responsible for structural design and construction monogement of bridges and office buildings.
AWARDS AND PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS NRC Special Achievement Award for superior efforts associated with his review of the I
seismic and structural issues related to the General Electric Test Reactor Registered Professional Engineer, Rhode Island American Society of Civil Engineers Earthquoke Engineering Research Institute l TERA CORPORATION
DONALD B.TULODIESKI Project Monoger Education B.S. U. S. Novol Academy Summary of Experience Mr.Tulodieski manages projects ranging in scope from project control and management systems to integrated information systems including material control, maintenance management, cost and schedule control, records management, and systems interface evoluotion. He hos extensive management experience in nuclear and fossil-fueled power plant licensing, warehousing procurement, testing and operations. Mr.Tulodieski has designed and implemented data base systems which provide quantitative means of evoluoting power plant reliability and availability in addition to automated systems designed to provide professionals access to vital technical and contractual information and data.
1978 - Present Project Monoger, TERA Corporation. Manages and porticipates in the evoluotion, design, development, and implementation of projects relating to document, information and management control systems. Addi-
- tionally, he has conducted evoluotions and seminors and consulted in major utility corporate material control programs.
1973 - 1978 Project Monoger, Babcock & Wilcox Company; Supervisor, Site Support-and Testing, Babcock & Wilcox Company. Directly responsible for all aspects of interfacing and focusing technical and licensing related
- a==*i<xcii= a= a =*iavietdi= coa'recteoi#9r -
O r ovrc ments while maintaining cost and schedule goals as promulgated by company guidelines and as required by the client. The above project I
monogement activities were performed for two separate NSSS contracts consisting of a total of four nuclear generating facilities.
As supervisor, site support and testing, established dato base u,d real-time systems for site-generated test dato and implemented a reliability and availability tracking system for B&W systems and equipment.
Resolved operating and start-up site problems associated with tlw performance of equipment and system testing and core physics test j
programs.
1970 - 1973 Engineer, Public Service Electric & Gas Company of New Jersey.
Qualified stationary engineer in the operation of 1,100 MW oil-fired generating station and the start-up and operation of gas turbine peaking units. Responsible for the generation and implementation of start-up testing procedures associated with the pre-critical and critical testing of two 1,100 MW nuclear generating units.
1965 - 1970 Lieutenant, U. S. Navy Nuclear Submarine Force. Responsible for the maintenance and operation of nuclear and diesel powered propuision and auxiliary equipment.
r Professional Affiliation American Nuclear Society National Micrographics Association 11/08/82 TERA CORPCRATION
. _ - . - - - _ - . - - _ - . - -- - . . - - .. .- . . - - -_ _ _- =. --
O JAMES A. LONG Vice President, Advanced Services Division Education B.S. U. S. Novel Academy Summary of Experience Mr. Long manages and porticipates in the onelysis, design, implementation and operation
- of information, records, and management systems required to support licensing activities or the unique needs of any organization. He has extensive erperience in the federal regulation of commercial nuclear power facilities. He has managed the environmental and safety evoluotions used to support federal licensing decisions on opplications to construct and operate nuclear power facilities.
1978 - Present Vice President, Advanced Services Division, TERA Corporation. Respon-sible for the investigation and definition of porticular user requirements for major records and information management projects. Managed the design, installation and multiyear operation of large-scale information systems at two major federal agencies, the Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
O i'7a - i'78 T c8"ic=> ^ i=*==>. "vci or a 9"ieterx c m mi>=to"- caeret"=* a eme reviewed the technical efforts to create the reports and proposols necessary to assist in formulating policy for the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Operating Reactor Project Manager. Managed the activities associated with the review and evoluotion of operating reactor licensing actions and events.
Environmental Project Manager. Managed the activities ossociated with the review, onelysis and evoluotion of environmental reports and the preparation of NRC environmental statements. Acted as the principal NRC witness during the public hearings associated with his projects.
1966 - 1974 Officer, U. S. Navy, Qualified Chief Nuclear Engineer by AEC (NRC),
1 Division of Novel Reactors, August 1972.
l l Awards l
i Received Navy Achievement Medal for superior performance of ossigned duties between 1972 and 1974.
Received High Quality Performance Award for performance os Technical Assistant to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC.
O 1/83/ (1)
TERACORPORATION l
C ROBERT L. CUDLIN Principal Nuclear Systems Engineer Education J.D. Georgetown University Law Center M.S. Nuclear Engineering, The Catholic University B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University Summary of Experience Mr. Cudlin has over nine years of experience in the nuclear energy field. He had direct involvement at the Congressional level with the policy oversight and budget authorization for the NRC and development of nuclear energy legislation. At the NRC he managed the containment research program and was Chairman of the Containment Research Review Group. He also directed multi-disciplinary engineering groups in assessing methods for combining dynamic responses, the analysis of hydrodynamic forces in pressure-suppresion containments, the development of a reactor safeguards program, and the environmental qualification of safefy related equipment. Most recently he was port of the NRC's TMI recovery team and a member of the Lessons Learned Task Force.
1980 - Present Principal Nuclear Systems Engineer, Systems Engineering Operations, TERA Corporation.
1979 - 1980 Principal Technical Staff Member, Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation, U.S. Senate. Provided technical analysis and advice on nuclear energy policy issues and legislation to the members of the Subcommittee.
l 1972 - 1979 Program Manager, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, NRC.
l Responsible for monoging NRC's containment safety research program.
This included major experimental studies ed analytical model develop-ment for pressure-suppression containment dynamic loods. Also respon-sible for interfacing with international containment research programs such as Marviken I and 2, Battelle C and D, GKSS and JAERI.
, Technical Assistant, Division of Operating Reactors, NRC. Assisted in l the direction of the technical staff for the evoluotion of operating
. reactors.
Technical Assistant, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC.
Provided technical assistance and advice on policy issues to the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Systems Analyst, Containment Systems Bronch, NRC. Responsible for technical licensing reviews of nuclear power plant containments. Was lead reviewer on BWR Mark I,11 and ill type containments including assessment of suppression pool dynamic loads. Also lead staff person for development and promulgation of 10 CFR 50.44, Standards for Combus-tible Gas Control Systems in Light Water Cooled Power Reactors.
Honors Tou Beta Pi Engineering Honorcry Publications i
"Recent Considerations of Pool Dynamic Loads in Pressure-Suppression Conto. nts,"
presented at IAEA Conference in Cologne, West Germany, December 1976.
l TERA CORPORATION
HENRY J. GEORGE Senior Mechanical Engineer r
Education Graduate Study Nuclear Engineering, Catholic University M.A.S. Administrative Science, University of Alabama Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University B.S.
iummary of Experience Mr. George has eight years experience in the licensing and evoluotion of nuclear power p!cnts and three years experience in general mechanical engineering on defense proje At TERA he has managed and performed technical work on various engineering onelyses and design verificottons. At the NRC, he directed a multidisciplinary engineering group which established adequate measures for the control of heavy loods throughout the plant; served as group leader for a review team that evoluoted the odequocy of protection from fires at a large number of operating facilities, and evoluoted the adequacy of available systems and equipment to achieve safe shutdown under various conditions. His defense-related work involved experience in reliability engineering, system test plans, sompting plans, failure onelysis, and component qualification testing. He has extensive training in nuclear plant systems and reliability engineering.
Senior Mechanical Engineer - TERA Corporation
(] 1981 - Present 1979 - 1981 Senior Engineering Systems Analyst, NRC. Served as Task Manager on a major unresolved generic issue monoging the efforts of a multi-disciplined engineering group to analyze the radiological and system operational consequences of various postulated events.
1974 - 1979 Engineering Systems Analyst, NRC. Served as group leader of a multidisciplinary nview tecm in evoluoting the effects of fires at nuclear power facilities. These reviews included detailed site visits, reviews of facility drawings, and onelysis of plant system responses to the effects of fires. Performed quality assurance tasks, including '
review of utility and vendor quality assurance programs, equipment
' and system test programs, procedures to implement the test pro-gram, and technical specification surveillance requirements.
Mechanical Engineer, U.S. Army Missile Command. Responsible for 1971 - 1974 providing engineering support during the development and produc-In this capacity, he tion phases of various missile systems. for system j
developed reliability models, established programs l occeptance and qualification testing and reliability assessment, and evoluoted test and operational failures.
l O
l l
, 9/82 TERA CORPORATION
-e - . . . - - - - - - - -
O CHRISTIAN P. MORTGAT Project Manager Education Ph.D.
- Civil Engineering, Stanford University Engineer's Degree Geotechnical Engineering, Stanford University M.S. Structural Engineering, Stanford University B.S. Civil Engineering, Tennessee Technological University Summary of Experience Dr. Mortgot has a brood background in probabilistic earthquake engineering that ranges from structural onelysis for buildings and earth dams to the development of seismic hozord maps. Dr. Mortgot hos developed a unique Boyesion risk onclysis methodology and hos studied earthquake response spectrum shapes and their ottenuation. He has directed
- or participated in major seismic risk analysis projects for Costa Rico, Nicaragua, Alasko, and Algerio. He has published numerous articles and reports in these creas and hos served as on independent seismic risk consultant to several componies. Developed a methodology based on expert opinion solicitation for computation of seismic hozord in the Eastern United States. The procedure was applied in the NRC Systematic Evoluotion Program l
O oimed at evoluoting the seismic design margin of nine older nuclear power plants in the Centrol and Eastern U.S. Developed a Monte Carlo approach to define the seismic hozord I at a site on on event specific basis. The approach was used to determine the seismic input l
in the NRC Seismic Safety Margin Research Program.
1977 - Present Project Manager, Earthquake Engineering, TERA Corporation. Respon-sible for several major seismic risk analyses, including one directed at all the Department of Energy (DOE) facilities.
1976 - 1977 Earthquake Engineer, Woodward-Clyde Consultants. Porticipated in a seismic risk analysis of the Gulf of Alaska for offshore drilling plot-forms.
1973 - 1977 Research Affiliate, Stanford University, J. A. Blume Earthquake Engi-neering Center. Developed new techniques to chorocterize the frequen-cy content of postulated earthquake motions and developed unique opproaches to calculating seismic exposure.
- Professional Associations American Society of Civil Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute i
!O -
10/82(l)
TERACORPORATION
-~---w- - - , , - - , . . , , _ . --
< O CWISTIAN P. MORTGAT Page 2 Publications Journal Papers Mortgot, C. P., " Seismic Risk Analysis, o General Approach," Pon American Institute of Geography and History, Reviste Geofisico, December,1976.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., "A Boyesian Model for Seismic Hazard Mapping."
Bulletin of Seismological Society of America. (in publication).
Papers Presented of Conferences Kiremidjian, A., and Mortgot, C., "A Probabilistic Approoch for Seismic Load Determino-tion," ASCE-EM Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Methods in Civil Engineering, Stanford, California, July,1974.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., "An Intensity Scale for Earthquakes," The Fifth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, istonbul, Turkey, September,1975.
Shah, H. C., Mortgot, C. P., Kiremidjian, A., and Zsutty, T., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicoroguo," The Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, January,1977.
O Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., "A Study of Stable Earti. quake Porometers," The Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, January,1977.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., " Stable Seismic Design Parameters," ASCE/EMD Specialty Conference at North Carolina State University, May,1977.
Mortgot, C. P., Potwardhon, A. S., and Idriss, l. M., " Influence of Seismicity Modeling on l Seismic Exposure Evoluotion." Seventy-Third Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America, April 6-8,1978.
Mortgot, C. P., and Shah, H. C., "A Boyesian Model for Seismic Hazard Mapping--A Case for Algerlo." Sixth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavio, September,1978.
Other Publications .
Shah, H. C., Mortgot, C. P., Kiremidjian, A., and Zsutty, T. C., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicaragua, Port 1," Technical Report No. I1, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, January, 1975.
Shah, H. C., Zsutty, T. C., Krawinkler, H., Mortgot, C. P., Kiremidjian, A., and Dixon, J. O., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Nicaragvo, Port 11," In two volumes, Technical Report No.12A and No.128, the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Enginering, Stanford University, March,1976.
O Mortgot, C. P., " Finite Element Analysis of Embankments on Weak Clay Foundotions,"
Engineer's Thesis, Stonford University, California, June,1976.
, , , , _ -.w-,- - - - - -
1 CHRISTIAN P. MORTGAT Page 3 Mortgot, C. P.,"A Boyesion Approach to Seismic Hozord Mapping; Development of Stable Parameters," Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Cofifornia, December,1976.
- Mortgot, C. P., Zsutty, T. C., Shah, H. C., and Lubetkin, L., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Costa Rico." Technical Report No. 25, The John ~ A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stenford University, April,1977.
. Mortgot, C. P., and Shoh, H. C., "A Study of Seismic Risk for Algerio." Technical Report No. 28, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, March,1978.
O l
O TFRA CORPCRATION
LOREN STANLEY Associate Principal Engineer EDUCATION M.B.A. University of Santo Cloro B.S.E.E. Cornegie institute of Technology
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE .
Mr. Stanley has twenty-six years of experience in engineering design, system evoluotion, field and consulting services associated with nuclear plant systems and aerospace instrumentation. He hos spent thirteen years monoging technical groups performing design, licensing, and consulting activities. His principal arcos of involvement have been FSAR licensing, response to NRC questions, failure mode and effects relicblility analyses, safety-related component determinations, instrumentation system design and analysis, and design review of engineering work.
EXPERIENCE Present Associate Principal Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1974 - 1983 Quadrex Corporation.
Group Manager, Licensing / Systems Analysis Department. Supervised consulting activities in licensing, design review, safety classification of O plant components and probabilistic risk assessment. Directed a technical review of STP engineering work performed by Brown and Root for HL&P.
Deputy Director, Engineering Services. Responsible for technical proposals, application of personnel to engineering projects, and review of technical output for client projects. Participated in G-List programs, licensing evoluotions, environmental qualification assessments, and occident monitoring instrumention programs.
Director, Project Services. Supervised consulting activities in Licensing ,
and Safety, Quality Assurance, Environmental Services, Reliability and o
Risk Assessment, Records Management, and Project Management.
Participated in a reliability improvement program for the MFTF Fusion Reactor, o licensing criteria evoluotion of the TNS fusion project, and on EPRI study of PWR feedwater steam generator level spurious trips.
Manager, Licensing, Safety and Reliability. Supervised FSAR reformat i
and addition of technical information for six BWR FSAR's. Supervised development and implementation of O-list methodology to identify and classify safety-related components and spore parts for LWR plants.
Supervised on occident monitoring instrumentation study of a typical Westinghouse PWR and a pressure sensor response time verification program for EPRI. Prepared FMEA's for TMI 1/2 ECCS, BWR 5/6 ECCS, HTGR Steam Dump System, ATR PPS Upgrade, and LMFBR secondary control rod system and test facility. Performed hozord analysis and MTBF ossessments for the ATR Upgrade program.
Q 3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
LOREN STANLEY Page 2 O 1963 - 1974 General Electric Company.
Manager, Nuclear Instrumentation and Protection Systems. Supervised the initial phases of conversion of the BWR safety system to o solid-state design. Supervised design of safety-related control ssytems, and prepared the technical system descriptions, compliance analyses, and technical responses to regulatory questions.
Technical Leader in Control and Electrical Systems. Performed design improvements for the BWR control rod drive system and reactor protection system. Designed instrumentation for the process computer system, rod worth minimizer system, and the prototype RWM system at Dresden I. Participated in the development and testing of intermediate range neutron monitoring system equipment.
PROFESSIONAL DATA Registered Electrical Engineer, State of California Senior Member, IEEE Member, IEEE/ PES Nuclear Power Engineering Committee Post Chairman, IEEE/ PES /NPEC Subcommittee 6, Safety-Related Systems Member, American Nuclear Society Chairman, ANS 4.S Writing Group on " Criteria for Accident Monitoring Functions in LWR's," 1979-1980
(' Member, ANS Nuclear Power Plant Standards Committee (NUPPSCO), 1981-1983 Member, IAEA Work Group on Protection System Safety Guide SG-D3, Vienna,1976 e
l O
3/83/1 TERA CORPORATION
O aics^ao w xeues Associate Electrical Engineer EDUCATION M.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Idaho B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Wyoming
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Keller hos had more than twenty years of experience in all phases of electrical power generation projects, including system design, startup, and hands-on operation and mainte-nonce in both nuclear and fossil plants. He has many years of specialized experience in the design and evoluotion of Instrumentation and Control systems, including plant protection systems and engineered safety features. He most recently consultated to EPRI's (now INFO) Nuclear Safety Analysis Center. His responsibilities included Licensee Event Report (LER) evoluotions to identify possible serious event precursors. He has directed multi disciplined teams of engineers in many on-site investigations of nuclear and fossil power generating facilities for the purpose of identifying problems in design,
- management, operations and maintenance that were contributing to losses in electrical production. He has made many contributions to the state-of-the-art in performing studies and evoluotions of power generating facilities. These works have been widely published.
Present Associate Electrical Engineer, TERA Corporation D
d 1982 - Present Independent Consultant providing consulting and engineering services to industry, particularly the electric power industry 1982 Senior Project Manager, TERA Corporation. Responsibilities included providing to utilities the development and application of reliability, availability, and decision analysis techniques directed toward improving the productivity of large fossil and nuclear power plants.
1979 - 1982 Monoger, Systems Engineering, S.M. Stoller Corporation. Served as Project Manager for the development of computer software specifico-tions and analytical techniques for the EPRI sponsored National Dato System. Additional responsibilities included LER evoluotions os part of NSAC's SEEIN Program.
1973 - 1979 Manager of Nuclear and Fossil Energy, System Development Corporation (formerly Mechanics Research, Inc.). Responsibilities included program management of several joint industry / government programs. The objec-tives of these programs included development and on-site demonstrotron of methodology and improved auditing /evoluotion techniques for (1) determining root causes of lost productivity and defining corrective octions, (2) modeling power plants to perform reliability and sensitivity trade-off studies, and (3) assessing total costs and benefits of imple-menting alternate unit improvement programs. These studies were cooperative efforts with utilities, A-E's, and designer / manufacturers of major power plant components and equipment.
3/83 TERA CORPORATION v,,r v - , - um,c- -,-n.-.e we , , . . -,.,.__n. , _ . . , . _ _ . _ _ __ _
O sic"^ao
- keuen e ge 2 1967 - 1973 Senior Research Er>gineer, Icoho Nuclear /Aerojet Nuclear. Responsible for the development of mothematical simulation modeis for power plant safety and control system designs. This included one of the earliest designs of a reactor protection system using solid state devices. Consul-tant to the AEC Reactor Sofety Study (WASH-1400). Responsible for the development and application of fault tree methodology to perform reliability / risk evoluotions of reactor protection systems and engineering safety features.
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
CERTIFICATION Certified Reactor Engineer (Expired)
Certified EIT - State of Idaho O
O 3/83 TERA CORPORATION
l O MEHMET CELEBI PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST EDUCATION Ph.D. Civil Engineering, McGill University M.S. Civil Engineering, Stanford University B.S. Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE l Dr. Celebi hos had over 16 years of experience in the fields of structural engineering, structural mechanics and dynamics, earthqucke engineering, plasticity, and nuclear power, including 8 years on the fcculties of the Civil Engineering Departments at the Middle East Technical University and Son Francisco State University. He is author or co-author of over 40 formal publications (books and professional articles), regarding structural and seismic engineering and engineering mechanics. On his own and as on associate with engineering and consulting firms, he has corried major engineering responsibility for projects in such creas as development of design criteria for nuclear structures, vibration and seismic studies for structures, reactor containment structural design and onelysis (including inelastic studies) and review of
! structural criterio and designs for nuclear power plants and equipment for seismic loodings. In addition to his engineering and design experience, Dr. Celebi l
held the position of Manager of Quality Assurance at a leading engineering consulting firm. He hcs also had extensive involvement with professional and code committees related to development of earthquake engineering design criterio.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AND HONORS Registered Professional Engineer (Colifornia)
American Society of Civil Engineers, Full Member Earthquake Engineering Resecreh Institute, Full Member Fulbright Scholarship, Stanford University Dominion Bridge Co. Fellowship, McGill University Japanese Government Scholarship at ISSEE, regarding dynamic testing studies O
srg TERA CORPORATION
)
O JORMA ARROS Structural Engineer Education Ph.D. Civil Engineering, Stanford University ;
(condidate) 1 M.S. Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland l B.S. Engineering, Helsinki, University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland Summary of Experience Mr. Arros has experience in research and onelysis in the nuclear engineering field. He has conducted analyses of both the dynamics of structures under earthquake conditions and a finite element model of groundwater seepage. He hos otso analyzed pressure vessels using structural analysis computer programs.
1980 - present Structural Engineer, TERA Corporation. Responsible for seismic hozord analysis codes.
1978 - 1979 Consulting Engineer, Wortsilo, Inc. Consulted on a study of mothemati-col modeling of paper web through a paper splitter.
1977 - 1978 Rosearch Engineer, Technical Research center of Finland. Performed q
U research in the Nuclear Engineering Laboratory and onelyzed structures under earthquake conditions, groundwater seepage and pressure vessels.
1974 - 1977 Teoching Assistant, Helsinki University of Technology Presentations / Publications
" Coupled Vibrations of a Structure and Fluid Excited by Pressure Shocks," presented to the Topical Meeting on Nuclear Power Safety in Brussels,1978. Also published in Nuclear Technology, December 1979.
,=
0 TERA CORPCRATION
i KENNETH W. CAMPBELL .
O Senior Earthquake Engineer Education Ph.D. Soll Mechanics Engineering, University of California M. S. Soil Mechanics Engineering, University of California B. S. Engineering, University of California Summary of Experience Mr. Campbell has ten years enerience in soil mechanics engineering. In addition to -
responsibilities that have included shallow seismic geophysical surveys, and seismic risk and seismicity studies, he has been involved in research in the fields of Boyesian seismic risk analysis and investigated earthquake site effects. Mr. Campbell has published extensively in these and related areas and has served as on independent seismic risk consultant to several companies.
1978 - Present Senior Earthquake Engineer, TERA Corporation. Responsible for seismic risk analyses and other geotechnical studies.
1978 Research Engineer, J. H. Wiggins Company. Responsibilities included the development of a Boyesion seismic risk mop of California based on geologic dato on major faults in California and,odjacent areas.
Consulting Earthquake Engineer. Responsible for shallow seismic geo-physical surveys, seismic risk and seismicity studio, design earthquake
' motions, site response onelyses, and chorocteristic site period determin-otions, l
l 1977 - 1978 Postdoctoral Scholar, University of California. Conducted research in the fields of Boyesion seisrpic risk onelysis, earthquake site effects, seismic reliability of lifeline systems, and the correiotion of the seismic velocity of near surface deposits with geology, depth and soil type.
1973 - 1978 Earthquake /Geotechnical Engineer, LeRoy Crandall and Associates.
Participated in the analysis and design of building foundations, and the performance of seismicity and seismic risk studies, seismic geophysical surveys and their onelysis, liquefaction analyses, chorocteristic site period studies, and seismic site response onelyses.
1972 - 1973 Research Geophysicist, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administro-tion. Responsible for research in engineering seismology and earthquake seismicity and risk. Developed site-dependent earthquake intensity distributions of large earthquakes.
Professiono! Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Seismological Society of Americo Tau Beto Pi, National Engineering Honor Society Internationo! Society of Soils and Foundation Engineering TERA CORPORATION
m -- m- +
+e w
- w--e.s ---- aa +--e ,--, ,y,.- -, v r .-----,-.,-g,.m.--.-,a , - - . . - - c -
l KENNETH W. CAMPBELL Page 2 O Publications Duke, C. M., J. A. Johnson, Y. Khorroz, K. W. Campbell, and N. A. Malpiede, Subsurf ace Site Conditions and Geology in the San Fernando Earthquake Area, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, (UCLA-ENG-7206),1971.
Campbell, K. W., An Empirico! Earthquoke intensity Function in Bedrock, M.S. Thesis in Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles,1972.
Perkins D.'M., S. T., Harding, K. W. Campbell, and A. F. Espinoso, Studies of Site Amplification in San Fernando, Proceedings of the Microzonction Conference, University of Washington, Seattle, Vol. II, pp. 910-927, 1972.
Campbell, K. W., Site Properties and Bedrock Intensities in the Son Fernando, California Earthquake of February 9,1971, in Earthquake Research in NOAA, 1971-1972, edited by J. C. Stepp, Environmental fesearch Laboratories, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, (NOAA TR ERL 256-ESL 28), p. 54, 1973.
Algermissen, S. T., D. M. Perkins, W. Rinehart, K. W. Campbell, and M. Hopper, A Study of Earthquake Losses in the Los Angeles, California Area, Environmental Research Laborofortes, Nationo! Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado (prepared for HUD),1973.
O Comabeii, x. W. and C. M. Du*e, Bed,ocu intensitx Atteeuction oed Site Factors from Soe Fernando Earthquake Records, in Optimization of Water Resource Systems incorporating Earthquake Risk: 1973 Contributions, edited by C. M. Duke and 5. E.
Jocobsen, University of California Wcter Resources Center, Contribution No.141, pp.81-114,1973.
Duke, C. M., J. A. Johnson, Y. Khorroz, K. W. Campbell, and N. A. Malpiede, Subsurface '
Site Conditions in the San Fernando Earthquake Area, in The San Fernando, California, Earthquake of February 9.1971,(EERl/NOAA), Vol. 118, 785-799, 1973.
Campbell, K. W. and C. M. Duke, Bedrock Intensity Attenuation and Site Factors from Son Francisco Earthquake Records, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 64:173-185, 1974.
! Campbell, K.W. and C. M. Duke, A Reply to a Discussion of Bedrock Intensity Attenuation and Site Factors from Son Fernando Earthquake Records by P.C.
Jennings, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 64:2009-2010, 1974.
Campbell, K.W., A Note on the Distribution of Earthquake Demoge in Long Beach,1933, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 66:1001-1005, 1976.
Eguchi, R. T., K. W. Campbell, C. M. Duke, A. W. Chow, and J. Paternino, Shear Velocities and Near Surface Geologies at Accelerograph Sites That Recorded the Son Fernando Earthquake, School of Engineering and Applied Science. University of California, Los Angeles,(UCLA-ENG-7653),1976.
O TERA CORPORATION I
KENNETH W. CAMPBELL Page 3
~
O Publications, Cont.
Campbell, K. W. and C. M. Duke, Correlations Among Seismic Velocity, Depth and Geology in the Los Angeles Area, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles,(UCLA-ENG-7662),1976.
Duke, C. M., R. T. Eguchi, K. W. Campbell, and A. W. Chow, Effects of Site on Ground Motion in the Son Fernando Earthqvcke, School of E'ngineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles,(UCLA-ENG-7688),1976.
CampbeII, K. W., Design Earthquakes Based on the Statistics of Source, Path and Site Effects, Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, Vol. 2, 2 2-55, 1977.
Duke, C. M., R. T. Eguchi, K. W. Campbell, and A. W. Chow, Effects of Site on Ground Motion in the Son Fernando Earthquake, Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, Vol. 2, 2 2-99, 1977.
Eguchi, R.T. and K.W. Campbell, Seismicity and Site Effects on Earthquake Risk, Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, Vol. 2, 2-399 404, 1977.
Campbell, K. W., The Use of Seismotectonics in the Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, (UCLA-ENG-7744),1977.
O Campbell, K. W., Geotechnical Correiotions of in Situ Seismic Velocity in Southern California, Proc. of Two Day Symposium on Living With the seismic Code,
- Structural Engineers Assoc. of So. Calif., Los Angeles, March 7 & 14, Sess.1 -
Chorocteristic Site Period, Sect. B, pp. 1-13, 1978.
Campbell, K. W., An Estimate of Recurrence Times from Seismotectonic Data on a Foult, in Geologie Guide and Engr. Geology Case Histories, Los Angeles Metropolitan Area,
! Ist Annual Calif. Sect. Meeting, Assoc. of Engr. Geol., May 12-14,1978, Los Angeles, pp.95-101, 1978.
~
Campbell, K. W., Lifeline Reliability and Seismic Risk, (Summary), Proc. of Lifeline Earthoucke Engineering Workshop, Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Posodeno, Calif., June 19-21,1978, Geotechnical Engineer-Ing Div., ASCE, Vol. 111, 1978.
Campbell, K.W., Empirical Synthesis of Seismic Velocity Profiles from Geotechnical Data, Proc. Second international Conference on Microzonction, Nov. 26-Dec. I, 1978, Son Francisco, Vol. II, pp. 1063-1075 1978.
Campbell, K. W., R. T. Eguchi, and C. M. Duke, Reliability in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Annual Convention and Exhibit, October 16-20,1978, Chicago, Preprint 3427,1978.
I O
TERA CCRPORATION
Page 4 KENNETH W. CAMPBELL Publications, Cont.
Campbell, K. W., A Boyesion Procedure for incorporating Seismotectonics in the Estimation of Seismic Risk on a Fault, Proc. ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Jonvary 10-12, 1979, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 290-294, i979.
Campbell, K. W., R. T. Eguchi and C. M. Duke, The Use of Reliability in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Proc. ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Jonvary 10-12, 1979, Tucson, Arizono, pp. 305-310,1979.
Presentations
" Subsurface Site Conditions and Geology in the San Fernando Earthquake Areo," Presented at the Son Fernando Earthquake Conference, Los Angeles, February,1972 (With J. A. Johnson).
" Bedrock Intensity Attenuotion and Site Factors from San Fernando Earthquake Records,"
Presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America, Golden, Colorado, May,1973.
" Distribution of Earthquake Domoge in Long Beach in 1933 as Related to Propogotion ond.
Site Effects," Presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Los Angeles, March 1975.
"A Comparison of Linear and Psuedo Nonfinear Methods of Site Response Analysis,"
Presented of the 70th Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Los Angeles, March,1975 (M. Lew, Speaker).
" Site Effects in Earthquakes," Presented of the meeting of the Los Angeles Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Los Angeles, April,1976 (with C. M. Duke and R. T. Eguchi).
" Design Earthquakes Based on a Demoge Threshold Level," Presented of the 71st Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America, Edmonton, Alberto, Conodo, May, 1976.
"Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk," Presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Socramento, California, April,1977.
" Correlations Among Seismic Velocity, Depth and Geology in the Los Angeles Areo,"
Presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America, Socromento, California, April,1977.
"The tJse of Seismotectonics in the Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk," Presented at the J. H. Wiggins Company, Redondo Beach, California, October,1977.
O TERA CORPORATION
Page 5 KENNETH W. CAMPBELL O Presentations, Cont.
"Boyesion Estimation of Se'ismic Risk on a Fault with Emphasis on Lifeline Systems, Presented at the Two Day Course on Seismic Risk Anciysis, EERI, Univ. of So.
Calif., Los Angeles, February 8 ond 9,1978.
"Geotechnical Correlations of in Situ Seismic Velocity in Southern California," Presented at the two Evening Symposium on Living with the Seismic Code, SEAOC, So. Calif.
Section, Los Angeles, Calif., March 7 & 14, 1978, Session I, Chorocteristic Site Period.
"Geotechnical Correlations of In Situ Seismic Velocity in Southern California," Presented of the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Sparks, Nevado, April 6-8, 1978.
"The Use of Seismotectonics in the Boyesion Estimation of Seismic Risk," Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America, Sporks, Nevado, April 6-8,1978. .
l
" Lifeline Reliability in Seismically Active Regions," Presented at 73rd Annuoi Meeting of the Seismological Society of Americo, Sparks, Nevado, April 6-8, 1978, (R. T.
Eguchi, speaker).
l "Geotechnical Considerations of the Seismic Design Code," Presented at Portiond State University, Portiond, Oregon, May 22,1978.
O *
" Lifeline Reliability and Seismic Risk," Presented at the Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Workshop Session, (Ponelist), Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Geotechnical Engineering Div., ASCE, Posadena, Calif., June 19-21, 1978.
" Empirical Synthesis of Seismic Velocity Profiles from Geotechnical Dato," Presented at the Second International Conference on Microzonation, Son Francisco, California, November 26-December 1,1978 "A Boyesian Procedure for incorporating Seismotectonics in the Estimation of Seismic Risk on a Fault," Presented at the ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Tucson, Arizona, January 10-12, 1979.
i O
TERA CORPORATION
EDWARD DUSTIN SCHRULL Associate Senior Nuclear Engineer EDUCATION i
M.S. Nuclear Power Systems Engineering, ]
. University of Arizona B.S. Mothematics, Minor - Mechenical Engineering, ,
Worcester Polytechnic Institute '
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Schrull has over nine years of experience in nuclear power engineering. His principal involvement has been in reactor safety systems, nuclear licensing, reliability and risk assessment, instrumentation and control and computer analyses. He hos served as lead engineer for environmental and seismic qualification reviews and safety and occident analysis for several nuclear facilities.
EXPERIENCE Present Associate Senior Nuclear Engineer, TERA Corporation.
Present Senior Engineer, Eigen Engineering. Provides project leadership in the licensing and systems engineering areas.
1982 - 1983 Senior Engineer, Western Omtec Corporation. Served as Project be Engineer for the CNV and NMP-2 FSAR review and annotation projects.
Responsible for initial review of all technical work as well as being the primary technical interface with the customer. Also directed the FSAR Chapter 6, 7, 8,14 and IS reviews conducted for Arkansas Power and Light at the customer's site.
1980 - 1982 Program Manager / Reliability or.d Risk Assessment, Guadrex. Directed company efforts in the safety analysis and risk assessment of the Taiwan Power Company low level radioactive waste transportation analysis; the diesel generator unavailability study in support of Commonwealth Edison's position on surveillance testing; and the Arizona Public Service Licensing Commitment Tracking System.
1979 - 1980 Unit Supervisor /Sofety Analysis Group, Nutech. Responsible for the technical direction of projects encompassing: controls and instrumento-tion (C&l) engineering support activities, emergency planning proce-dures, reactor operation information displays and guidelines, and safety analysis report calculations. Lead engineer for the environmental and seismic qualification review effort for three BWR plants. Participated on a systems analysis task force evoluoting the impact of the lessons learned from Three Mile Island to Fermi 2.
i i 1977 - 1979 Lead Engineer, General Electric Company. Provided technical leader-ship for accident analysis licensing tasks which involved the preparation of safety onelysis report responses to questions generated by the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Architect-Engineers, and utilities.
3/83/l ,
TERA CORPORATION
EDWARD DUSTIN SCHRULL Page 2 O 1974 - 1977 Nuclear Engineer, Westinghouse Honford Company. Served as cognizant safety engineer for the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Reactor System.
Handled test assembly design proposals, design change implementation, and was responsible for the overall safety analysis of the FFTF reactor. l Proposed a method for bounding protected reactivity insertion events ,
which is presently used as a licensing basis for the operation of the FFTF.
COMPUTER EXPERIENCE Mr. Schrull instructs FORTRAN programming at Son Jose State University and has programmed in BASIC, COBOL, PASCAL and Assembler. He has used the following machines: IBM 360/370, Univac 1108, Xerox S/7/9, CDC Cyber and 7600, PDP-lI, Honeywell 6000, o PRIME minicomputer, and a SHARP microcomputer.
PROFESSIONAL DATA EIT, State of Californio O
O 3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
l 1
l STANISLAV FABIC Principal Scientist EDUCATION Ph.D. Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley M.S. Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley M.E. Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia B.E. Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Austratio Novel Architecture, University of Zagreb, Yugoslavio
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE 1982 - Present Principal Scientist, TERA Corporation.
1973 - 1981 Chief, Analysis Development Branch, Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Supervised professioncis (all GS-15 grade) engaged in monoging various research prograrns, conducted. at five National Laboratories and various universities in the creo of analysis development and verification, for application to nuclear safety. Yearly budget over $10 M. As o Branch Chief, responsible for identification of goals, plans, work programs, selection of contractors, review of work progress, and reporting of accomplishments to NRC higher level management, Commissioners, Advisory Committee for Reactor Safeguards, and Congressional Committees. From July 1979 was a member of the Senior Executive Service.
Chairman of the NRC/RES Containment Review Group.
Member of the following: (c) NRC/RES Advanced Code Review Group, (b) NRC/RES Code Assessment Review Group, (c)
CSNI/NEA Working Group on ECCS (Paris, France), (d)
CSN!/NEA Working Group on Containments, (e) NORHAV (Nordic Countries) Review Group, and (f) Marviken IV Project Board (Sweden).
1967 - 1973 Advisory Engineer, Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems. At Westinghouse, Pittsburgh, involved in the methods development for analyses of the following: (a) blowdown-induced forces on piping, reactor, and steam generator internals; (b) blowdown-Induced thermal and hydraulic transients in the primary coolant system before and offer iniection of the emergency coolont; (c) pipe rupture (break opening time); (d) choked two-phase flow during blowdown; and (e) steam generator feed-line break (hydro-elostic onalysis).
Participated in drciting Westinghouse position statements on matters pertaining to ECCS hearings.
O
. dM i STANISLAV FABIC Page 2 Principal Scientist At Kaiser Engineers, 1963 - 1967 Project Engineer, Kaiser Engineers. (c) Hollogen and Oakland, worked on the following projects:
noble gas removoi; (b) blowdown analyses for the preliminary design of LOFT test facility; and (c) thermal radiation from the nuclear rocket exhoust plume at NERVA test facility.
Research Engineer, institute of Engineering. At the Institute of 1958 - 1963 Engineering Research, Berkeley, porticipated in a research project on transient boiling and boiling incipience.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION American Nuclear Society
- Sigmo-Xi O
l l
l 1
i
i O
ST-Suv FABiC Page 3 Principal Scientist PUBLICATIONS AND LECTURES Books S. Fabic, " Review of Existing Codes for Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis", pp.
365-404 in ADVANCES IN NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Vol.10 Edited by E. Y. Henley, Y. Lewins, M. Becker, (Plenum Publishing Corp.,1977).
S. Fabic, " Accident Analysis", Chapter 6.6 in HANDBOOK OF MULTIPHASE SYSTEM, Editor G. Hetsroni, (Hemisphere Publishing Corp.,1981).
Technical Paper (Sole Author)
"BLODWN-2: Westinghouse APD Computer Program for Calculation of Fluid Pressure, Flow, and Density Transients During a Loss-of-Coolant Accident", ANS Transactions Vol.12, No. I, p. 358 (1969).
I " investigation of Methods for Coupled Structural Hydrodynamic Analysis of Reactor internals" Proceedings, Conference on Flow induced Vibrations in l
Reactor System Components, ANL-7685 (1970).
f O "BLODWN-2 Code Prediction of Pressure Undershoot During Transition from Subcooled to Saturoted Blowdown" ANS Transactions Vol.13, No. I, p. 386 (1970).
"Two- and Three-Dimensional Fluid Transients" ANS Transactions Vol.14, No. I,
- p. 360 (1971).
" Comparisons Between Results of the Westinghouse Loss-of-Coolant Analyses and Semiscale (ECC) Test Data Port II: BLODWN-2A Code Results," CONF-730304, p. 702 (1973).
" Data Sources for LOCA Code Verification," Nuclear Safety Journal, Vol.17, No.
6, Nov.-Dec.,1976).
" Computer Codes in Water Reactor Safety: Problems in Modeling of Loss-of-Coolant Accident," Conf. Heat-Fluid Flow in Water Reactor Safety, Manchester, U.K., paper C201/77 in Proceedings, institute of Mechnical Engineers, London, England (Sept.1977).
" Analytical Modeling of Transient Tw@ hose Flow," ANS Transactions 1979 Summer Annual Meeting in Atlanto, Georgia, (June 1979).
" Code Assessment for Nuclear Reactor Accident Analysis Prograrns/' 1980 International Conf. on World Nuclear Energy, Washington, D.C., pp. 254-255, ANS Transactions Vol. 35, (1980).
O e
-,e -- - , ,- ,--,-,,,-,,-w,,,-,,,--w,,, ,,-_ , , , , , - . -
---,---w- 7,- - - - - - ~ - ,.m,-- --.- = , , - - + - - -- -
O sTAsiSLAv rabic Principal Scientist Page /:
Reports I. Company Reports (All Sole Author)
- a. Kaiser Engineers Division of Kaiser industries Ccrp.
- l. "Early Blowdown (WATER-HAMMER) Analysis for Loss-of-Fluid Test Focility," 65-28-RA (1965).
- 2. " Digital Computer Blowdown Analysis for Loss-of-Fluid Test Focility, Port 1: Engineering," 65-29-R (1965).
- 3. " MERCURY: Digital Computer Program for Heat Transfer Analysis," 66-26-R (1966).
- 4. "CASRAD: Digital Computer Program for Calculation of Thermal Radiction from Plumes," 67-II-R (1967).
- 5. " Computer program WHAM for Calculation of Pressure, Velocity, and Force Transients in Liquid Filled Piping Networks," 67-49-R (1967).
l Westinghouse, Nuclear Energy Systems, PWR Systems Division Q b.
Digital Computer Program for Calculation of I. "BLODWN-2:
Hydraulic Transients During a Loss-of-Coolont Accident,"
WCAP-7235 (1968).
- 2. " Tornado Induced Water Removal from Spent Fuel Storage Pool," WCAP 7313-L (1969).
- 3. " Topical Report, Loss-of-Coolant Analysis: Comparison Between BLODWN-2 Code Results and Test Dato," WCAP-7401 j
(1969).
l " Calculation of Loss-of-Coolant Through a Propagating t 4.
Longitudinal Crock, U:ing the Modified BLODWN-2 Code,"
-- WCAP-7405 (1969).
- 5. " Preliminary Report on Synthesis of Equivalent Piping Networks for Blowdown Analysis of the Reactor Primary Coolant System, with BLODWN-2 Code," WCAP-7421-L (1969).
. 6. " Description of the BLODWN-2 Computer Code," WCAP-7593 (1970).
- 8. " Feed-Line Break Analysis for Model-D Steam Generator,"
WCAP-8158 (1973).
..m..
- "'"r- - --'-w -_ .-%% y _,_ ,_
t Q STANISLAV FABIC Principal Scientist Page 5 ll. Government Sponsored Reports: Reactor Technology TID-4500 Issued by Institute of Engineering Research, University of California, Berkeley, under AEC Contract AT(ll-l)-34, Project 42: " Reactor Heat Transients Project".
- l. " Reactor Heat Transients Research, Annual Summary Report," SAN-1002, TID-4500,16th Edition (Nov.1961) (co-author).
- 2. " Reactor Heat Transients Research,1962 Annual Report," SAN-1007, TID-4500,18th Edition (March 1963) (co-outhor).
- 3. " Vapor Nucleotion on Surfaces Subjected to Transient Heating: Ph.D.
Thesis," SAN-1008, TID-4500 (August 1964) (scle author).
- 4. "A High Pressure Test Focility for Transient Boiling Studies," SAN-1010, TID-4500 (June 1963) (principal cuthor).
111. Reports issued by Nuclear Reculatory Commission f S. Fabic and P.S. Andersen, " Plans for Assessment of Best Estimate LWR Systems Codes," NUREG-0676 (July 1981).
O Lecteres(Aiiinvited)
" Design Basis Accidents and Containment Criteria for LWR's" Presented at IAEA Interregionel Training Course on Nuclear Power Plant Construction and Operations Management, of Argonne National Laboratory.
(Courses sponsored by the International Atomic Energy Agency).
Lectures presented during-
- 1. Fall Session (Sept.-Dec.,1976),
- 2. Spring Session (Jan.-April,1977),
- 3. Fall Session (Oct.-Nov.,1977).
l
- 4. " Emergency Core Cooling System Performance," Two lectures presented at the IAEA Training Course in Nuclear Power Safety Analyses Review, at Argonne National Laboratory (Sept.1978).
S. " Nuclear Reactor Safety Applications," Lecture presented at the course, "Two-Phase Flow" of Drexel University (Continuing Professional Education),
Philodelphia (Dec. 18,1978).
O e
"*-9 9--e'ec- ---w-.3_,._-- , . , . , . , _ _ ,, _
1 - l l t' -.,
}- a.
l .,
STANISLAV FABIC ,
i
]' Principal Scientist Page 6
- 6. " Survey of LOCA Computer Codes," (Lecture #LWRS/80/7) and "LOCA Computer Code Assessment," (Lecture #LWRS/80/II), Two lectures presented at the ISPRA Course (1980) titled " Thermal-hydraulic Problems Related to LWR Safety", sponsored by Commission of the European Communities Joint Research Center, ispro, Italy (May 19-23,1980).
- 7. "Applicotion of Computer Codes to Resolution of LWR Safety issues,"
Lecture presented at a Seminor on Two-Phase Flow, Massachusetts Institute
! of Technology (April 30,1981).
Panels ,;
- 1. As a member of the panel on " Loss of. Coolont Accidents in Nuclear Reactors," Eighth National Heat Transfer, Conference (ASME-AICHE), in Los Angeles, presented' o discussion of methods of blowdown analysis (August 8,196S).
- 2. " Summary Review of Meeting Highlights - Understanding NSSS Response to Design Basis Events," presented at ANS Thermal Reactor Safety Meeting at Sun Valley, Idaho (August 1977).
O 3. "erobiems in Simeiotioe of Necieer Reactor eient Thermoi Hxdreeiics for Postulated Small and Intermediate Breek Accidents," presented et the Simulation and Analy:Is Panel, Working Conference on Advanced Electro "
Technology Applications to Nuclear Power Plonts, sponsored by NRC and IEEE, Washington, D.C. (Jan. IS-17,1980).
s s,
- 4. "How Good the Codes Have To Be," hird CSNI Speciolist Meeting on Transient Two-Phase Flow, Colifornio Institute of Technology (March 193,1).
e
+ #
e ,
- 4
-* +
{ P^ l
.me<~
GSM j-5 a
.h
~ A
-- ,~
a l 2
- s .
NORMAIO A.BERUBE
- Senior Engineering Systems Analht' s
Education ~
M.S. n Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire B.S. Astronautical Engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy Summary clf[xeerience l
l Mr.Berube hos extensive technical experience in the design and appI! cation of energy related systems anofysis programs. In addition, he hos over five years experience in computer programming ond data management projects related to the development of
% anoiytical models to support energy technology development.
1981 - Present Senicr Engineering Systems Analyst, Waste Monogement, Services Division, TERA Corporation. Primary responsibilities include onelytical evoluotion red modification of rodwoste systems, computer programming and system analysis to support development of similation modeling techniques, and participation in Information retrieval software development projects associated with the nuclear utility industry.
1979 - 1981 Senior Systems Analyst - JBF Scientific Corporation. Developed and opplied onelytical models to simulate the operational performance of O .
solor-electric' energy systems along with methods and models to evoluote their economic potential in a wide variety of applications.
Assessed the mejor technical, economic, resource, environmental, and institutional constroints to the successful commercialization of energy l technologies. Prepared technology transfer strategies and market l development plans. Principal investigator and author of technical I reports containing recommendations to the U.S. Congress, the U.S.
Department of Energy, and the Soler Energy Research Institute.
1978 - 1979 Mechanical Engineer, Research and Development - Data General Corporation. Performed onelytical and experimental research in heat
~ transfer, fluid dynamics, and contamination control. Inventor of
~
- pctented equipment related to the operation of a computer disk drive.
5 1977h1978 University o_f New Hampshire. Designed and established a solar rodiotion dato ocquisition system. Conducted bi-weekly recitations in P. . ,
. Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics.
k 1978 - 1980 ~ Consulting Systems Analyst - Mariae Systems Engineering Laboratory 7 -
.~ s . (port-time). Completed all heat transfer onelysis and o :. outer model-
'- - - ing of an unmanned thermal ice drill. Three-dimens onal finite
- difference simulation verified by the U.S. Army Cold Regions
_ Loboratory. ;
y ,
1971 - 1976 ' Captain, United States Air Force, Standard Evoluotion Flight Examiner.
, .p. 1. Responsible 'for squadron navigational training and evcluation.
Received the U.S.A.F. Commendation Medal for outstonding service.
Q '? s
. ,~ .
7
' ~.1 - -
. , ,' TERA CORPORATION gi ,
J{ .
1 :
r O JOtt4 ANGELO Senior Systems Engineer ,
i EDUCATION Graduate ' Mothematics, Physics, Chemistry, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, Studies New York Solid and Fluid Mechanics, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
M.S. Engineering, Union College, Schenectady, New York B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho SPECIALIZED TRAIN!NG COURSES Steam Turbine Supervisors Course, General Electric Company Fluid Mechanics, General Electric Company Heat Transfer, General Electric Company -
Advanced Engineering Program, General Electric Company
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE M.r. Angelo has thirty years of engineering experience covering a brood range of responsible assignments os a test, performance, insto!!ation and maintenonce engineer for the General Electric Turbine Division; development and design of fluid systems and O components for nuclear plants; supervisory and monogement experience on nuclear projects for the U.S. Navy; technical expert for the U.S. Army Engineers Reactor Group; and monogement of safety and licensing reviews of nuclear power plant construction permits and operating licenses for the Atomic Energy Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
1981 - Present Senior Systems Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1972 - 1980 Task Monoger for Systems interaction in Nuclear Power Plants, Unresolved Sofety issues Program, NRC. This included monoging a program for modeling nuclear plant systems and their interdependencies using fault trees, and developing methodologies for the purpose of identifying potential interactions between redundant systems or subsystems as a result of physical or spatial interconnections.
Senior Licensing Project Monocer, NRC. Managed the octivities asso-ciated with the safety review ond evoluotion of opplications for con-struction permits and operating licenses.
1964 - 1972 Bronch Chief, Nuclear Engineering Bronch, Novol Focilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy. Supervised the work of a number of engineers with responsibilities for engineering evoluotions of nuclear projects for ,
the shore-based novo! nuclear progrom.
O TFDA nnDCODATON -
ANGELO, JOFN Page 2 1963 - 1964 Mechonteel Endneer, U.S. Army Engineers Reactor Group. Performed a wide variety of engineering ossignments os a mechanical engineering in the oesign, operation, maintenance, installation, testing and inspection of power plants, systems and components.
1960 - 1963 Mechanical Engineer, Performed design engineering for fluid systems and components for the Nuclect Power Division of ALCO Products, Inc.
and ALLIS CHALMERS MANUFACTURING CO, including transient onelysis and final safety cnolysis for nuclear reactors.
1949 - 1958 Development Engineer, Large Steam Turbine-Generator Dept., General Electric Co. Provided specialized analysis of steam turbine and heat cycle performance in centrol power plants. Responsible for planning, performing, and onelyzing the results of tests of power plant heat cycles for design improvements of large steam turbines. Developed specialized instrumentation and data gathering techniques needed to obtain the
. design information.
Turbine Supervisor, General Electric Co. Responsible for general work in the installation, startup and maintenance of steam turbine generators in centrol power plants, including turbine vibration beloncing.
O Perfer m ence eestneer. Lorse Stea m -Turhie oept.. c eeerei eiectric co-Responsible for planning and performing overall efficiency and heat cycle performance tests in central power plants, including supervision and instruction of test personnel and calculation and analysis of test results for design information and contract obligations.
REGISTRATION Professional Engineer in the State of Mossachusetts O
Tcoa r/Y)CnDATinN
FARZIN RAMEZANBElGI Civil / Structural Engineer Education B.S. Structural Engineering, San Francisco State University Summary of Experience 1982 - Present Civil Engineer, TERA Corporation. Responsibilities include usage and interpretation of structural computer codes such as SAP IV, SAP V, and ADLPIPE.
1982 Teaching Assistant, San Francisco State University. Responsible for assisting advisor in use of computerized systems for engineering applica-tions.
1981 - 1982 Assistant, Billman Construction Corporation. Assisted owner of this small business in determining technical engineering requirements for residential buildings. Also performed a wide range of general construc-O tion duties.
l O 2/83 (1)
~
TERA CORPORATION
SUSAN SLY Project Engineer O Educotton 2
B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Toledo
! Summary of Experience ,
t Ms. Sly coordinates the design, development, and implementation of large scale automated information retrieval and records rronagement systems related to nuclear licensing and engineering in the utility adustry. In this capacity, her J. experience in on-site client interface and program monogement has included participation in the development and applicotton of systems hardware, sof tware, and procedures tailored to meet specific user needs and satisfy a broad scope of regulatory and quality assurance requirements. As a civil engineer, she has been involved in the structural design and analysis of nuclear power plants and has actively participated in the technical review and update of engineering records for those plants, including the development of specialized keyword indexes used to analyze and update FSARs.
1981 - Present Project Engineer, TERA Corporation. Responsiole for
- Implementing automated information monogement systems within nuclear utilities. Developed keyword indexes used in FSAR update systems along with proced-I ures for system implementation through program comple-tion and acceptance. Provides interface between soft-wore development and user requirements as well as user training. Participated in the technical review and update 1
O of FSARs and other technical documents related to the nuclear utility industry, including porticipation in imple-menting specialized subject indexing capabilities for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control System.
1978-1981 Civil Engineer, Bechtel Power Corporation. Involved in
- the design of nuclear power plants; including structural design, dynamic analysis, computer opplications, and sels-mic survey. Worked on-site during construction of a nuclear power plant where duties included design, design verification, and inspection.
Participated in a project involving oil to cool conversion of a steam plant. Responsibilities included structural design and interface with mechanical, electrical, and architectural design groups. Wrote specifications for purchase and placement of materials.
1977-1978 Engineering Aide, City of Toledo. Collected and compiled dato on street measurements and conditions, inspected bridges, surveyed, and scheduled street maintenance.
O .
l 11/4/82 1 TERA CORPCRATION
O aics^aoa uocoo"^'o Senior Mechanical Engineer Education M.B.A. Monogement, Golden Gate University B.S. Physics, U.S. Naval Academy (with merit)
Summary of Experience Mr. MacDonald has diversified experience in all facets of the design, procurement, construction, and licensing of large power plants, including the development of various computerized systems for efficient plant operations. He hos managed a wide range of engineering efforts of various steges of project development, such as conceptual and
, detailed design, construction, startup and continuing support to operating plants. He has directed and participated in the design and implementation of ecmputerized systems which control data related to power plant equipment, maintenance monogement, engi-neering and construction task management, spore parts and material control, plant reliability assessment and tracking of radiological exposure data. His efforts have been focused on the development of systems to support utilities in the construction, operation and molntenance of power plants.
1980 - Present Senior Mechanicci Engineer -Information Systems, TERA Corporation.
Responsible for the development of computerized document control and operating data systems, os well as large-scale systems for project monogement and project control. Mnnoges the development and imple-
, mentation of multi-opplication records and data monogement systems for power plant environments. These rystems and services are designed to yield immediate benefits to the client in terms of improved productiv-Ity and plant evollobility.
l 1971 - 1979 Project Engineer-Bechtel Power Corporation. Directed the molysis
! requirements, citernatives and costs for decommissioning nuclear power plants. Provided consulting support to on international team which developed a new reactor / containment design, including evoluotim of >
plant arrangement, systems and structural design concepts.
Assistant to the Mcaoger of Engineering, developed and maintained engineering standards and procedures and monitored research and development progroms.
Engineering Group Supervisor, responsible for mechanicol, nuclear, in-strument and control, and HVAC systems design, procurement octivities and project licensing efforts for two twin l100 MWe nuclear power plants. Speclo! assignment to BWR Owners' Group Task Force for the resolution of common containment design problems.
1967 - 1971 Officer, U.S. Navy. Assigned to the Engineering and Operations Deport-ments and attended numerous training programs (e.g., nuclear power and c
engineering officer schools). Responsibilities included supervision of the
! operation and maintenance of all engineering systems of a destroyer and l
coordination of all material maintenance management activities for o guided missile cruiser.
TERA CORPORATION
CHRISTIAN C. NELSON SENIOR REACTOR OPERATIONS ENGINEER EDUCATION
. B.S. Naval Engineering, U.S. Naval Academy
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Nelson has over twelve years of experience in the nuclear energy field. At the NRC he was responsible for maintaining an effective program for the -
inspection of operating nuclear power plants. He has managed numerous safety and environmental evaluations associated with operating nuclear power plants.
He directed a multidisciplinary engineering team in reviewing implementation of TMI Lessons Learned at operating reactors. He hos also been lead engineer in resolving several generic safety issues.
1983 - Present Senior Reactor Operations Engineer - TERA Corporation.
1975 - 1983 Operating Reactors Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC. Responsible for directing and performing evaluations of licensing issues for numerous operating power plants. in particular coordinated safety evaluations for power upgrades, seismic design reviews and increases in spent fuel storage capacity. Responsible for resolution of various technical issues including PWR moderator dilution, station blackout procedures and natural circulation cooldown.
Senior Reactor Operations Engineer, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, NRC. Responsible for managing the operating reactor inspection program to cssure proper emphasis on the priority among inspections, balance inspection requirements with manpower resources and integrate the inspection program with other NRC activities.
Team Leader, Lessons Learned implementation Review, NRC.
Directed review of TMl Category A Lessons Learned t
implementation at all Combustion Engineering and early Westinghouse designed power reactors.
l 1970 - 1975 Officer, U.S. Navy. Served as engineering officer during four I
deterrent patrols and shipyard overhaul aboard a nuclear powered submarine. Qualified in submarines.
l AWARDS NRC Special Achievement Award for managing evaluation of GETR seismic O '>=ee= ="a r are ">'es " a c e'v=*'ee #2 av8c 8 r'"s-TERA CORPORATION
O ;oSEeH eE"ziE" Senior Scientist Sc.D. Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Washington Summary of Experience Dr. Penzien has had over thirty-five years of experience in structural engineering, including twenty-seven years on the factulty of the University of Californio at Berkeley.
He is the Director of the Earthquake Engineering Research Center at the UC Berkeley. '
Dr. Penzien is on expert in the seismic response of structures including highway bridges, Professional Affiliations h pd i
American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineers Association of California Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Seismological Society of Americo American Concrete institute Honors 19S9 NSF Post Doctoral Fellowship 196S Research Prize, ASCE 1969 NATO Senior Science Fellowship 1973 NSF Senior Science Fellowship 1977 Electec Member, National Academy of Engineering 1978 Elected Fellow, American Academy of Mechanics 1979 Elected Honorary Member, Peruvion Assoc. of Earthquake Engineering 1980 Silver Medal of Ports l
l l .
O TERA CORPO7ATION
DANIELE VENEZIANO Q- Associate Principal Civil Engineer EDUCATION Ph.D. Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Laureo Architecture, Facolta di Architetturo, Firenze, Italy
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Dr. Veneziano has served on the engineering faculty of the Massachusetts institute of Technology for nine years. His principal fields of interest are the engineering opplication of probobility and statistics, safety of structural and geotechnical systems, and experi-mental design and data onelysis. He has provided independent consulting services to o variety of clients, including Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, EPRI, Yankee Atomic Power Compcny, and Sandio Noticcol Laboratory. Dr. Veneziano has authored or co-authored over fifty professional publications on such topics as probabilistic seismic onelyses, reliability ana!yses, computer modeling, and statistical uncertainty.
GOVERNMENT COMMITTEES Committee Beginning Ending Joint European Committee on Structural May,1975 December,1975 O Safety CEB-CECM-CIS-FIP-IABSE ASCE Committee on Reliabi!ity March,1975 -
Subcommittee on Safety of Nuclear Structures CSCS Technical Committee on Limit States July,1980 Design AWARDS Award for Outstanding Gradvote Teaching, M.I.T., June 1979 l Award for Outstanding Graduate Teaching, M.I.T., June 1981 ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP Sigma XI American Society of Civil Engineers O
3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
i MICHAEL B. AYCOCK Project Manager EDUCATION
- Graduate Studies Nuclear Engineering, Catholic University B.S. Aerospace Engineering, U.S. Novel Academy
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE +
Mr. Aycock has eight years of experience in the federal regulation of commercial nuclear power plants. Since joining TERA Corporation, he has managed and participated in a number of projects with nuclear utility clients. This includes acting as the Project Monoger and/or principal engineer on projects involving the evoluotion of heavy load handling operations of nuclear power plants. At the NRC he has developed programs for resolving important generic safety issues encompassing numerous technical disciplines and hos participated in directing the efforts necessary to carry out the programs. He has also managed the safety reviews of nuclear power plant construction permit and operating license opplications. -
1980 - Present Project Monoger - TERA Corporation 1972 - 1980 Deputy Director, Unresolved Safety issues Program, NRC. Responsible for planning and carrying out the highest priority NRR tasks addressing
- O a " r'c >=' *v ' -
Technical Assistant, NRC. Coordinated and reviewed the technical efforts necessary to develop proposals and recommendations to assist in the formulation of policy by Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations, with principo! participation in the formulation of policy on generic soiety issues. Acted as the principo! NRC witness on generic safety issues at public hearings associated with licensing nuclear power plants.
j Licensing Project Manager, NRC. Managed the activities associated j
with the safety review and evoluotion of applications for construction permit ed operating licenses, AWARDS Received NRC Meritorious Service Award in 1979 for outstanding performance in the development, organization, implementation and management of the NRC Generic issues Program.
Received NRC Specio! Achievement Award in 1976 for superior efforts associated with his performance os Project Monoger for the safety review of the Indiano Point Unit 3 operating license opplicotton.
Q PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION American Nuclear Society
, - - , ~
GEORGE JOSEPH TRIGILIO, JR.
Engineering Manager Education B.S. Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts Chemical Engineering Technology, Franklin institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts Summary of Experience Mr. Trigilio hos held numerous management and technical positions of increasing responsibilities. He is presently directs a multi-disciplined team of senior level professionals. Mr. Trigilio's technical expertise is in the design of waste treatment systems. He has worked extensively in the design and analysis of radioactive waste treatment systems for nuclear power plants and has been involved in the design, specification and purchase of waste treatment system components for numerous utility plants, in oddition, he has supervised a research and development department and managed the technical and licensing requirements for a fleet of radioactive waste shipping casks used in the transportation of power plant wastes.
1979 - Present Engineering Manager - Woste Management Services Division, TERA Corporation. Responsibilities include all engineering aspects of the rodwoste generation and disposal cycle with extensive involvement in the design and analysis of rodweste treatment systems, low-level waste storage facilities and the economic and engineering violability of volume reduction systems. During this time period a study was begun for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission which resulted in his authoring NUREG-2206 which represents a comprehensive completion and data base of volume reduction techniques for low-level radioactive waste.
1977 - 1979 Engineering Group Manager, Hittman Nuclear & Development Corporo-tion, Columbia, Maryland. Responsibilities included department budge-tory control, technical direction, and personnel supervision of: the Engi-neering Design; Research, Development end Testing; and the Plann-ing/ Scheduling and Document Control sections. Additir;no!!y, was Pro-ject Manager for o Shipping Cask project, with direct responsibility for all corporate radioactive waste shipping container design, safety analyses, and Nuclear Regulatory licensing certification.
1975 - 1977 Analysis Group Lead Engineer, Brown & Root, Incorporated, Houston, i
Texas. Responsible for sunervising the development of a major program I to simulate the operation of a Radioactive Weste Treatment system.
Assisted in the preparation of an Environmental Report for licensing of a multiple-unit nuclear site, involving economic evaluation of power production alternatives and calculation of isotopic dispersion.
l l
l O
10/82(l)
TERA CORPORATION
O GEORGE JOSEPH TRIGILIO, JR. Page 2 1972 - 1975 Engineer, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporction, Boston, Massachu-setts. Responsible for determining the capital cost and operating eco-nomics of three processes for BTX extraction from reformatted and/or pyrolysis feed stocks.
Assistant to the Head of Computational Methods gecialist. Prepared the specification for the purchase and assisted in the design of an Off-Gas treatment system. Co-authored a curve fitting program.
Professional Affiliations American Institute of Chemical Engineers American Nuclear Society National Energy Coordinating Committee of the American Institute of Chemical Engi-neers (post member)
Board of Directors of Harris County Municipal Utility District #5 (post President)
O l
l l
O l
10/82(l) TERA CORPORATION
4 O LEwwv R. LAAxSo Senior Associate Structural Engineer EDUCATION B.S.C.E. Tufts University,1974 M.S.C.E. Mossochusetts institute of Technology,1976
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Lookso has seven years of experience os a structural engineer in the power industry, primarily in the structural analysis and design of building.s and equipment for nuclear, hydroelectric, and fossil fuel power plants.
1980- Present Sr. Associate Structural Engineer, TERA Corporation Lead Structural Engineer, Riley Stoker Corporation, Worcester, Mass.
Responsible for analysis and design of steam generator support struc-tures from review of customer specifications through completion of construction. Designs boiler intimate steel for high temperature service.
Determines feasibility of modifications to existing structures. Estab-lishes and maintains structural engineering schedules and provides tech-nical guidance to personnel in the group. Writes department technical O standards.
1977 - 1980 Lead Civil Engineer, Hydroelectric Power Division, Chos. T. Moin, Inc.,
Boston, Mass. Responsible for final civil and structural design of i
powerhouse, intoke structure, spillway, roads, and bridges for 600 MW Shiroro Hydroelectric Project; scheduling and approval of construction drawings; development of structural design criteria; review of specifico-tions. Administered technical aspects of contract for spillway radial gates, intoke gates, and draft tube gates. Conducted technical studies and reviewed contractor submittels for the Construction Manager.
Supervised conceptuci design phase for Merrill Creek Reservoir Project.
Civil Engineer, C.T. Main. Anolysis and design of reinforced concrete structures; review of construction drawings; review of vendors' calculo-tions and drawings.
1974 - 1977 Engineer, Structural Mechanics Section, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston Mass. Seismic analysis of nuclear power plants; analysis and design of steel support frame for polar crone; evoluoted
- design of concrete shear walls for seismic and wind loads; finite analysis of stress in concrete ring girder.
O TERA CORPORATICN
LENNY R. LAAKSO PAGE 2 O
1973 - 1974 Engineering Aide, Planning Bronch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waltham, Mass. Collected and organized technical dato relating to water resource projects; studied feasibility of structural and nonstruc-tural flood control measures.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Registered Professional Engineer (Structural), Massachusetts Member, American Society of Civil Engineers HONORS & PUBLICATIONS Graduated summa cum loude from Tufts Elected to Tau Beta Pi, National Engineering Honor Society Design of Offshore Gravity Platforms, thesis presented at MIT,1976 O
2 O
TERA CORPORATION
l l
l STEPHEN F. SCHREURS O Project Manager, Woste Monogement Services Division Education B.S. University of Mossochusetts, Chemical Engineering Summary of Experience Mr. Schreurs has nine years of nuclear experience in the creo of rodwoste processing, design, analysis and disposal. This experience has included both engineering onalysis and group monogerial responsibilities for private and governmental organizations. He hos developed computerized analytical models of ECCS, CSS, and boron recovery systems.
Mr. Schreurs has been involved in all facets of the nuclear waste problem, especially the immobilization and disposal of high-level and transuranic wastes and the solidification, packaging and disposal of low-level radioactive wastes.
1980 Project Manager, Waste Management Services Division, TERA Corpo-ration. Primary responsibilities include rodwoste system evoluotion and onelysis.
1977 - 1980 Project Manager, Performance Analysis Section, High-Level Weste Li-censing Bronch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Sciety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Responsibilities included developing a copobility to analyze the perform-once of a deep geologic nuclear waste repository. Mr. Schreurs assisted in the development of the proposed 10 CFR 60 regulation, along with the accompanying reguiotory documents (i.e. regulatory guides and staff O ,
technical positions), and interfaced with other government agencies on matters concerning the performance ossessment of repositories. He also !
monitored the technical aspects of contracts related to deep geologic i repositories which were sponsored by other NRC offices.
1976 - 1977 Computational Methods Specialist and Sampling Systems Specialist, Process Engineering Specialty Group, Nuclear Industries Division, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation. Major activities consisted of reviewing and updating specifications for buying sampling systems; laboratory testing of simulated nuclear plant rcdioactive wastes; prepo-ration of sections pertaining to the processing systems for o PSAR of an l Italian nuclear power plant; and modeling the CSS for redesign using eductors for pH control instead of injection pumps.
1972 - 1976 Computational Methods Specialist, Process Engineering Specialty Group, Nuclear Industries Division, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation.
Supervised the Computer Section of the Process Engineering Group.
Responsible for modeling the complete radioactive waste system for BWRs (i.e. reactor core to drums); modeling and refining the existing a
computer modeling otherprogram for process chemical the boron recovery systems systems for nuclear in PWRs, power plants (e.nd g.
waste evamrotors and demineralizers). Further responsibilities included recruitment, monoging the engineer-in-training program for the group, and teaching refresher courses in moth for the Professional Engineers Exam.
O :
10/82(1)
TERACORpORATION
O STEPHEN F. SCHREURS Page 2 Licenses E.I.T. portion of professional engineer Societies American Institute of Chemical Engineers - Full Member Publications
. Schreurs, S.; " Overview of the High-Level and Transuronic Waste Branch Modeling '
Effort;" U.S. Nuclect Regulatory Commission,1978 Contributing author to " Technical Writing Style Guide," NUREG-0650, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 1979.
O l
i O
10/62(l)
TERACORPORATION
. _ - . . . _-- . - - - - . . . . . . ..- . _ , =-- . . .-.. . . . - . _ - - - - . .__ __.. . .
.-. _ - . _ - . __ - - _ - .. = _ .
O ooUGLAS M. WITT Senior Mechanical Engineer Education M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Illinois institute of Technology B.S. Mechonical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology Summary of Experience Mr. Witt has more than 15 years of experience in the nuclear engineering and consulting i field. His project work in this oreo has included safety sequence analysis, licensing, system design, equipment design, pipe rupture analysis, and procurement. He has monoged and participated in numerous projects for several corporate organizations with responsibility for technical services and financial monogement. In addition, he hos provided special technical services for on advanced analysis group performing thermal hydraulic analysis for nuclear and fossil power plants, and has served as technical manager for a design organization of more than 100 engineers.
1983 Senior Mechanical Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1973-1982 Manager, Structural Design Division, EDS Nuclear. Responsible for structural design services for operating nuclear plant backfit and for design modification and analytical qualificotton associated with licensing upgrades.
Manager, Advanced Analysis Section, EDS Nuclear. Monaged analysis O efforts to define thermal hydraulic forcing functions for plant structures and systems subjected to transients associated with both abnormal occurrences and anticipated operational conditions.
Project Manager, EDS Nuclear. Provided technical direction on mulil-discipline projects for construction-stage and operating nuclear plants.
Projects included both PWRs and BWRs with integrated design and onelysis activities including safety sequence analysis, licensing, system design, pipe rupture mitigation, piping system qualificotton and design.
1972 - 1973 Industrial Consultant, Argonne National Laboratory. Designed mechani-col test facilities, cnd test programs for equipment and components utilized in the sodium fast breeder program.
1971 - 1972 Mechanical Engineer, Projects Group, Sorgent and Lundy. Directed l interfacing mechanical design efforts for safety-related systems within i the NSSS vendor scope of supply.
1967 - 1971 United States Navy, Nuclear Power Program. Completed tour of duty as Director, Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Division at the nuclear training command with responsibility for establishing qualifications and imple-menting a training and testing progrom to qualify personnel.
(1/83)!
k I TERA CORPORATION
O DOUGLAS M. WITT Page 2 Recistrations Registered Professional Engineer - Mechanical Engineering, California and lilinois Professional Affiliations l Arnerican Society of Mechanical Engineers I .
O Y
(1/83)I TERA CORPORATION
i JAMES 1. OWENS Principal Associate Engineer O
Education B.S.E.E lowa State University
, , Advanced Engineering Program, General Electric Company Summary of Experience Mr. Owens has had over 30 years of experience in the design and construction of power plants - fossil and nuclear. He was General Monoger Production Engineering and Construction for o major utility with responsibility for generation planning, as well as design and construction of all production facilities. In this capacity he functioned as a member of the utility executive staff and worked with AEs, suppliers, NRC, other
, regulatory bodies and interfaced with the public. He has had major responsibility for cost and schedule performance.
1982 - Present Principal Associate Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1979 - 1982 General Manager, Production Engineering and Construction, Delmarvo Power & Light Company. Responsible for the design and construction of a 500MWe cool fired power plant and the conversion of a two unit oil fired plant to coal, as well as additions and improvements to the existing system.
1978 - 1979 Monoger, Production Engineering & Construction, Delmarva Power &
Light Company. Responsible for plannning new facilities and all preliminary engineering and licensing work on a 500MWe cool fired power plant.
l 1976 - 1978 Manager, Power Plant Design, Delmarvo Power & Light Company.
- Responsible for the specification, bidding, and evoluotion of twin unit j Nuclear Steam Supply Systems and preliminary design of BOP.
1973 - 1976 Project Manager, Summit Nuclear Power Plant, Delmarvo Power & Light Company. Staffed the Project Organization, negotiated contracts for the NSSS, Turbine Generator, and most major auxiliaries. Directed Preliminary Design and Licensing through the Construction Permit for twin HTGRs. Responsible for nuclear engineering for the station.
1950 - 1972 General Electric Company, Gibbs and Hill cnd General Atomic Company.
Engineering and managerial assignments included development of control systems for Peach Bottom & Dresden Nuclear Power Plants and the Sea Wolf nuclear submarine, and preparation of PSARs for sixteen research and test reactors.
Professional Affiliations Registered Professional Engineer, New York Member, American Nuclear Society Member, IEEE l
Member, EPRI Nuclear Divisional Committee TERA CORPORATION
LUIS E. FLORES, P.E.
Associate Principal Electrical Engineer EDUCATION B.S. Physics, University of Miaml
, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Univeristy of Miami
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Flores has over eight years of experience in the nuclear power industry. He has been
- involved in the design, operation and testing of nuclear power plant systems, with an emphasis on instrumentation and control systems engineering. He hos had lead responsibility for performing comprehensive failure analyses and developing the startup test program for several plants.
EXPERIENCE Present Associate Principal Electrical Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1983 - Present Principal Engineer, Eigen Engineering. Provides consultation services in the systems engineering, operations, and licensing areas specializing in
, , both analog and digital instrumentation and control (I&C) systems.
1981 - 1982 Principal Engineer, Western Omtec Corporation. Responsible for,the complete review, revision and annotation of the Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 7 for the CNV and NMP 2 plants including resolution of
- system design and operational discrepancies. Performed comprehensive
! Control System Failure Analyses for the Honford 2, Shoreham, Perry and Riverbend plcnts including identification of effects of power system and control system failures on the plant's safety systems and its ability to ochieve cold shutdown. Managed the complete review and revision of all functional control diagrams and instrumentation and electrical diograms for the Leibstadt, Susquehanno and Shoreham plants, i
1980 - 1981 Monoger of Data System Department, Validyne Engineering Corporation.
Directed all systems engineering activities relating to the implemento-tion of large Data Acquisition Systems in nuclear power plants.
Responsibilities included development of customer-unique system con-figurations, necessary to meet functional as well as licensing require-ments of each plant. Coordinated a two year equipment qualifications effort which culminated in the full Class IE certification of the Validyne Data Acquisition System.
1975 - 1980 General Electric Company, Nuclear Energy Division.
Lead Startup Engineer, Zimmer Nuclear Power Station. During this two year assignment, directed a group of Startup Engineers in the development of Zimmer's Startup Test Program. Responsibilities included preparation of all test procedures and providing licensing support for Startup Test Program including answering NRC questions and revising the FSAR, and review of all opplicable plant operation O procedures.
3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
LUIS E. FLORES, P.E. Page 2 Startup Engineer, Tokai 2 Nuclear Power Station, Jopen. During this 18-month assignment, porticipated in all phases of the Startup Program.
Responsibilities included installing and calibrating portions of a transient test recording system, conducting and analyzing numerous NSSS and BOP System tests at oli power levels and providing reactor engineering and core management services to utility staff. Also directed special design verification tests for the reactor recirculation system and the plant process computer system.
Associate Engineer, GE Nuclear Energy Division. Responsibilities included analytical studies of fuel pin behavior in fast breeder reactors and development of a computerized model for predicting suppression pool response during various BWR transients such as LOCA, ATWS, and MSIV closure.
PROFESSIONAL DATA Mechanical Engineer, State of California Professional Engineer, State of Ohio Senior Reactor Operator Certification,1979-O i
O 3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
-r -- - m-- - --en et-
O MOmE .I. WISE Prinelpol Associate Engineer EDUCATION B.S. Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE 1
Mr. Wise hos had extensive and diverse experience in nuclear and systems engineering.
Throughout his career, he has worked at several levels, including superintendent, for '
nuclear po'wer plants and been responsible for verled duties such as recruiting and training staff, directing engineering functions, supervising construction surveillance, and designing, constructing, modifying, and operating in-reactor and out-of-reactor research and development testing facilities. In systems engineering he has been responsible for welding and fabrication engineering, nondestructive examination technique and equipment development, maintenance engineering, quality and retichility assurance programs, and computer systems development.
1982 - Present Principal Associate Engineer. ,
1980 - 1982 Senior Project Manager, TERA Corporction. Responsible for
' providing senior level technical services to utilities. Since joining TERA, Mr. Wise hos porticipated in and managed projects involving O ad ti s ri==i s < >x ^a iv t- a a rt . d v i ar=s ="a implementing information monogement systems, nuclear plant quality assurance program assessment and improvement, generating plant productivity improvement programs, inservice inspection program assessment and definition, and organizing and developing nuclear plant technical support programs.
i 1982 - 1980 Director and Assistant Director of Guolity Systems Engineering Department, and Management, Operations Engineering Section, Southwest Research Institute. Functions included welding and fabr! cation engineering services, nondestructive examination (NDE) technique and equipment development, NDE services including Inservice inspection, maintenance engineering services, quality and reliability assurance program development and implementation, vendor evoluotion and surveillance services, and dato processing and Information monogement systems development and services.
Project Manager and primary porticipont in the development, implementation, and operation of the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS).
1964 - 1972 Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of the Lacrosse Nuclear Power Plant, Doiryland Power Cooperative. Responsible for the overall monogement of the plant and several support functions including plant engineering, fuel management, quality assurance, and contract odministration. Licensed Senior Reactor Operator.
TEPA CORPORATION
O u osre s. wise Principal Associate Engineer Page two 1962 - 1964 Engineer, Coolant Systems Development Operations, General Electric Company. Responsibilities included the design, construction, modification, operation and results evaluation of in-reactor and out-of-reactor research and development testing facilities.
1957 - 1962 Supervisor, Reactor Operations, and Reactor Operations Specialist, General Electric Company.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Wisconsin Professional Engineer Society American Society for Quality Control American Society for Nondestructive Testing American Nuclear Society O
l l
t i
l O
TERA CORPORATION
STEPHEN N. BRISCOMBE Associate Electrical Engineer EDUCATION B.S.E.E. (Equivalency),1964 Electrical Guild Certificate, Leeds College of Engineering & Science, l England,1964 Electrical Technicion Certificate,1964 National Technician Certificate, Horrogate Technical College, England,1959 American Management Association Certificate,1974 4
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Briscombe has over 16 years of broad experience in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. He has managed numerous projects involving technical and administrative direction in such diverse areas as field engineering activities, identifico-tion of design problems, electrical quality control programs and control room panel modification. He has conducted seminors for site installation and computerized cable and connection programs.
EXPERIENCE
. Present Associate Electrical Engineer, TERA Corporation.
Q 1980 - Present Western OMTEC Corporation.
Manager, Site Services. Responsibilities include Site Engineer selection, business development for site service contracts, technical orx! adminis-trative direction of site supervisors and engineers.
Monoger, C&l Design Engineering / Project Manager. Responsibilities included management direction of 30-man project providing system
- design, modifications documentation and Field Disposition Instructions
, (FDI) for the Perry & Cofrentes BWR Projects.
Senior Systems Engineer. Assigned to General Electric offices to provide system change reviews, modifications, FDl's and Field Deviation Disposition Requests (FDDR's) evoluotions for the Honford 2 (BWR).
Major system reviews were HPCS, RHR, process and area radiation monitoring; 1977 - 1980 Engineer Staff Consultant, Bechtel Power Corporation. Provided site consulting responsibility in the construction area for all San Francisco Power Division Projects. Formulated and conducted training seminors for site engineers in the following areas: cable pulling, termination techniques, roceway (conduit and troy) Installation and computerized cable and connection programs.
1976 - 1977 Senior Electrical Engineer, General Electric Company. Assigned to the Fermi site. Responsible engineer for coordination.
i 3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
STEPHEN N. BRISCOMBE Page 2 O
Senior Electrical Engineer, Nuclear Energy Division. Wrote, designed and coordinated FDDRs for the C&l effort at La Salle. Wrote installation instructions and procedures, analyzed instrument and control schematics and designed control room panel schemes along with revamping existing design to provide more flexible and controlloble systems. ,
1976 Senior Control's Engineer, Enrico Fermi Unit 2, Energy and Process Systems, Inc. Supervised 2 I&C Engineers in the Detroit Edison Offices, Detroit, Michigan. Work included the design review of the Fermi 2 I&C, schematics and elementories, general drawing review, identification of design problems and document control evaluaiton. Initiated and wrote 100-page final report identifiying problem areas and recommending solutions.
1974 - 1976 Assistant Project Field Engineer, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Bechtel Power Corporation. Organized and controlled the site Area Engineering organization. Responsibilities consisted of directing and supervising opproximately 3S Area Engineers and 10 Technicians; coordinating all field engineering octivities; ensuring uniformity of construction tech-
'niques between major building creas; and pre-planning and scheduling of construction activities.
1971 - 1974 Engineering Consultant, Hatch Nuclear Plant, Bechtel Power O Corporation. Consultant Engineer's work involved liaison between Georgio Power Company site personnel and Bechtel Power Corporation design office. Instructed GPC personnel on field engineering techniques.
Interfcced with GPC and Bechtel management on scheduling, design drawing and specification interpretation cnd construction techniques.
1970 - 1971 Senior Field Engineer, Pilgrim Nuclear Station, Bechtel Power Corporation. Responsibilities included start-up and checkout of nuclear systems and organization of Electrical Quality Control Program.
1967 - 1976 Field Engineer - Electrical, Monticello Nuclear Plant, (GE-BWR) Bechtel Power Corporation. Responsibilities included procurement of electrical material; design of temporary electrical; installation of motors up to 6,000 HP; electrical G.C.; design cable tray and conduit layouts; construction and start-up checkout of all electricci control schemes; supervision of electrical construction; and checkout of installation for O.C. and Quality Assurance programs.
O 3/83/1 TERA CORPORATION
SIDNEY J. BROWN O Construction Services Educotton Engineering Management, University of California, Berkeley, California Electrical Engineering, Son Francisco City College, Son Francisco, Californio Summary of Experience Throughout his 30 years in the engineering / construction profession, Mr. Brown has gained extensive experience in the creas of construction management and scheduling, labor relations, craft supervision and personnel administration. As manager of a construction computer systems group, Mr. Brown developed systems to facilitate the processing of project dato and quality control reports related to both nuclear and nonnuclear power projects. Developed a TERA site access monitoring and security system for the construction industry. Most recently, completed the construction, startup, initial operation and molntenance of the notion's first residential electric cogeneration power plant at a large apartment complex for Southern California Edison.
1980 - Present Manager, Construction Services, TERA Corporation. Primarily respon-sible for coordinating tasks associated with the design, construc-tion, stortup and operation of major power-generating facilities. Con-trols all phases of project implementation relating to construction, engineering i review, cost engineering, planning and scheduling, field construction and Q quality control engineering. Serves as interface between construc-tion t
controc-tors and subcontractors, suppliers, architect / engineers, and owners of property involved with projects.
1965 - 1980 Construction Specialist, Bechtel Power Corporation. Held various post-tions, ranging from field engineer, craft supervisor, ossistant site man-oger and assistant project engineer to construction coordinator, responsi-ble for project control systems design, implementation, training and auditing. Supervised the mechanical / piping area on three-unit nuclear power project.
1964 - 1965 Arsa Administrator and Construction Planning Consultant, H. L. Yoh and McDonnell Douglas Corporation. Directed support services for on aero-spoce facilities project during design and construction operations.
.. 1961 - 1964 Assistant Project Superintendent, Field Project Engineer, and Contracts Administrator, Noble Company. Responsible for the engineering /procur-ement odministration of support services contracts.
1960 - 1961 Monoger of Engineering, Bloxhom Engineering. Supervised the design and fabrication of prototype equipment.
1955 - 1960 Leod Research and Development Engineer, Senior Layout Specialist, and Assistant Production Monoger, Noble Company. Responsible for the manu-focture of construction-related equipment.
1951 - 1954 U.S. Army, Army Security Agency, Electronics installations and main-O- tenance.
TERA CORPCRATION
LEONARD M. STOUT Sen or Project Manager B.S. Engineering Management, University of Missouri School of Mines. Majored in Mechanical Engineering and Business Management. :
Summary of Experience Mr. Stout has a brood background in the energy industry including cost engineering, con-
- struction field engineering, design development and field implementation of computerized project control systems and monoging " gross-roots" implementations of minicomputer facilities and systems. His extensive knowledge of the work process and control aspects of the design, construction, startup and operations phases of fossil and nuclear projects has been incorporated into computerized scope, schedule and cost control systems developed by TERA for our c!!ents.
1977 - Present Senior Project Manager - Information Systems, TERA Corporation. Mr.
Stout has provided project leadership to several major projects. These projects include the conceptual phcee studies for a utility-wide informo- i tion monogement system, technical ser < ices implementation plan for o developing Engineering and Construction Department within a utility service company, development of material control systems that inte-grote activities of manufacturers, orchitect/ engineers, and constructors, the design and management of projects in Michigan, Texas, New Jersey, Georgia, Pennsylvania, California, Arizona, Colorado and New York.
1976 - 1977 Project Control Systems Group Supervisor, Bechtel. Provided consulting O er ice -d *echnic=i direction to aroject ched iins and e
- er a *-
ensure technical quality of methods and procedures os related to :
computerized project control systems.
In this capacity, Mr. Stout has traveled extensively throughout the U.S.
to consult on both nuclear and fossil projects, including BWR, lignite, and low sulfur cool plants.
1975 - 1976 Project Control Engineer, Bechtel. Implemented material, cost and scheduling control systems on two Bechtel nuclear projects in the Engineering Design phase.
1974 Staff Assistant to Field Construction Monoger on a three-unit (each SOO-MWe) mine mouth cool station in Wyoming. Responsibilities included .
coordinating the activities of cost engineering, scheduling, subcontracts, field engineering, spervision, and startup.
1971 - 1973 Senior Field Engineer on a two-unit, 600-MWe oil-fired station in New York. Successively served as a Field Cost Engineer, Assistant Field Electrical Engineering Group Leoder, and Stoff Assistant to the Project Superintendent, responsible for all computer and material control activi-ties.
1968 - 1969 Design and Field Engineer for Trunkline Gas Company in Texas and Illinois.
l
!0 l
TERA CORPORATION .
-y -y.3-------pw ---,- - ge pi-, e,9, -w,.wm.,,e, e,,,,m - . - . - , , - . , ..m-3,.-,,,,c- ,,c----e- e- y- , - , , .,-,e - - - - - - - , . - - - - - -
4.
O eseDEnicx u.BenTHaoHo Senior Mechanical Engineer
~
Education M.S. Nuclear Engineering, University of Washington -
B.S. U.S. Novel Academy Summary of Experience Mr. Berthrong has extensive experience in the managen ent and odministration of design, licensing, procurement and construction of large power plant projects. He is currently involved in the design and implementation of information and monogement systems in-ciuding computerized systems for on-line pe-formance of a vorlety of administrative tasks. He has recently completed the design and implementation of a Maintenance and Operating Data System for a large electric generating station. His responsibi!! ties have included day-to-day supervision and management of large-scale projects both in the design office and at construction sites.
1977 - Present Senior Mechanical Engineer - Information Systems Division, TERA Corporation. Performed and managed numerous projects related to informction management including the design and implementation;of f
N large-scale records management, maintenance management and material control systems and the development of other computer oppilcations.
! 1975 - 1977 Lead Project Field Engineer, Bechtel. Directly responsible for all field i engineering octivities in the Reactor Building and Containment complex (2-Il00 MWe Units) and interfacing with all other on-site organizations.
Coordinated direcify with superintendents for planning, scheduling and problem solving. Acted as lead superintendent during various project phases. .
1972 - 1976 Engineering Supervisor, Bechtel. Mechonical croup Supervisor respon-sible for supervising all nuclear, mechanical and HVAC systems design and procurement and for project licensing.
1965 - 1970 U.S. Navy. Completed nuclecr power trotning crid served aboard a nuclear submarine with primary responsibilities in the engineering deportment.
Registrations '
Registered Professional Engineer - Mechonical Engineering, Californio and Washington
_ r Awards l Awarded on Atomic Energy Commission Special Fellowship in Nuclear Engineering by s the University of Washington. ,
Q TERA COPPCRATION
- 3. ;
T
, :, s.
BERT V. M TORE Principal Engineer - Construction Services Qc N s C .
sq. ,
/ I.
N EDUCATION , , ,
- o ' B.S., CivilMqineering, Mossochusetts Institute of Technology
,a, Gradvote Studies, Business Monogement, Harvard University
- M, ;
+
f }.
7
SUMMARY
OF' EXPERIENCE. .
Mr. Mortore has over 30 yeors of experience in engineering aid construction,
. ,, , - with on expertise in the creo of structural engineering. His extensive experience
includes oil areas of light and heavy construction, commercial, and industrial s ^- projects, tnth domesticolly and Internationally. As Vice President of Prescon M' '"c , *
, Corporation and President of North East Post-tensioning Consultants, Inc., he
, .- has'been rrsponsible for the entire range of engineering and construction
.'.uctivities, including conceptual and final design; specificotton, fabricotton, old
- supply of 3gonstruction materials; preparation of design drawings and i, specifications; construction management, scheduling, supervision, and inspection.
In addition, he wcs directly involved in' the design and construction of nuclear I
l O' pluit containment' structures for Arkansas I and 2; Crystal River 3; Calvert Clitis I and 2; Oconee I,~2 and 3; and Turkey Point 3.%
P 1 r
~
s l
PROFESSIONm. AFFILIATIONS N Registered Professionct Engir;eer, Mossochusetts
- , n.
Member, American Society of Clvil Engineers Member, American Concrete Institute '.- -
,s
'# A, g
me O
1 l l v' '
TERA CORPORATION
O ROBERT C. SNYDER Project Engineer ,
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr.Snyder is highly qualified in the field of facilities design and construction. He has worked extensively in the design and onelysis of waste trectment systems for nuclear power p! ants and industrial manufacturing plants. In addition, he has had overall project manegement experience from formulation of concept through construction, start-up and operction. Control of A&E efforts, construction operations; budgets; subcontracts; purchasing; and equipment design are elements of his expertise. His experience hos -
included mechanical and electrical design of facilities, equipment and processes for rodwoste and heavy industrial manufacture.
Present Project Engineer, Waste Management Services Division TERA Corporation.
Responsibilities include evoluotion and design of rodweste facilities, process-es, and equipment with emphasis on operations and maintainability.
1977 1980 Principle Engineer, Hittmon Nuclear & Development Corporation, Columbia,
- Maryland. Provided design concepts and engineering onelysis for all HNDC j activities. Fields of endeavors covered; solidification systems, storage facilities solidification machinery, and casks. Particular tasks covered:
powdered resin dewatering equipment, pumping systems, structures, mochine design mechanical and pneumatic conveyors, electrical control, filtration equipment, ion exchange equipment, process, system and equipment specifi-
> - cotions, shipping cask safety analysis, hydraulic and pneumatic power units and controls, instrumentation and others.
1966-1977 Project Manager, Assistant Division Engineer, Plant and Facilities Engineer, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, Oakland, California. Projects included construction of costing, " extrusion, fabricating facilities, water and air pollution control and complete processing plants. Consulted with foreign offiliates, and Saudi Industrial Development Fund. Performed new plant planning function. Controlled multi-million dollar projects from concept to st art-up. Supervised A&E and Construction operations 4irectly and through subordinates.
1962-1966 Vice President, Division Manager Container Division, The Baltimore Steel Company, Baltimore, Maryland. Designed, tested and fabricated military and engine containers for componies such as General Dynamics, Kholmorgen, Nortronics, Martin, General Electric, Westinghouse, North America Aviation, Pratt & Whitney Aircraf t, Thiokol, U.S. Navy, U.S. Army, and others.
l 1959-1962 Chief Engineer, Charles T. Brandt, Baltimore, Maryland. Duties involved l overall supervision of Engineering Department engaged in design of fabricot-
! ed metal products, mochinery, military and commercial vehicle components,
- - process equipment and orchitectural products.
- O -
TERA CORPORATION
. . . - .-_ . _ = . -
STANLEY W. KAUT Associate Electrical Engineer Education B.S. Electrical Engineering, Rochester institute of Technology Summary of Experience Mr. Kout has had 20 years of diversified engineering experience with emphasis in design l review, construction, testing, operation, licensing and quality assurance of electrical i power, instrumentation and control systems and equipment. He has made continuous i contributions to the nuclear power industry since his involvement with the BWR turnkey program. His experience with electrical power includes the installation, testing, and servicing of substations, motor control centers, switchgear, power trnosformers, motors, generators, D.C. battery systems, bus duct, cabling and related metering, and reioying.
His experience with instrumentation and control includes the installation, testing, design, calibration, and maintenance of process systems and equipment that measure such variables as level, flow, pressure, temperature, and vibration; and of nuclear systems such as neutron monitoring, creo and process radiation monitoring, and rod control. Mr. Kout hos also had significant experience with design review, plant procedures and Quality Assurance (QA). He has directed a technical group responsible for providing design review services to nuclear utilities. The services have been directed toward providing on independent assessment of plant safety, operability, maintainability, inspectability, and availability features. Mr. Kout has developed procedure programs for several BWR and PWR power plants providing for the administrative control of plant personnel during
,O startup testing, operation, maintenance or on-line surveillance testing. Mr. Kout's inv9ivement with quality (QA/QC) includes first-hand experience performing QC octivities in manufacturing shops, electrical equipment installation sites and at nuclear power plant construction sites. He has L 'en involved in the development and review of .
quality programs and procedures (including training) for AE's utilities, and manufacturing organizations. He has porticipated in many audits and is certified as a lead auditor.
Present Associate Electrical Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1975 - Present Manager, Systems Engineering, NUTECH.
1970 - 1975 Manager of Projects, Nuclear Services Corporation.
1963 - 1970 Field Engineer, General Electric Company.
Reaistration Electrical Engineer, State of Collfornia Nuclear Engineer, State of California Control System Engineer, State of California O
TFPA CORPORATION
O RANDY S. CLELAND Project Engineer Educatioa M.A. Business Administration, Sangamon State University B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University .
Summary of Experience Mr. Cleland has over ten years of experience in the design, construction, operation, and maintecance of power generation facilities with emphasis on mechanical engineering, construction management and results engineering.
1983 - Present Project Engineer - TERA Corporation. Responsible for providing construction monogement and plant operations support services.
- 197S - 1983 Results Engineering Supervisor, Coffeen Power Station, Centrol Illinois Public Service Company. Responsible for cool fired power plant operating efficiency, instrument and control maintenance, and laboratory octivities. Developed performance test procedures, periodic
. testing programs, equipment inspection procedures, and preventive main-tenance programs. Recommended improvements in operating procedures and managed plant betterment projects.
> Mechanical Engineer, Power Plant Construction. Responsible for review and monitoring of mechonical design portion of a major fossil fue!ed O_ power plant and other operating station odditions.
Area Construction Engineer, Power Plant Construction. Responsible for contractor management and monitoring of various construction octivities for o major fossil fueled power plant.
1971 - 1975 Cooperative Engineer, Sorgent and Lundy Engineers. Completed work-study program which included positions os draftsman, designer, ossistant engineer, and mechanical engineer on nuclear and fossil power plant design projects.
Recistration Registered Professional Engineer - lilinois l
Professional Affiliations American Society of Mechanical Engineers Tou Beta Pi, Engineering Honorary Society i Pi Tou Sigma, Mechanical Engineering Honorary Society
- O TERA CORPORATION
EDWARD M. BECK l
Principal Associate Engineer, Nondestructive Testing J
Education B.C.E. Auburn University
- Summary of Experience Mr. Beck hos over 15 years experience in the creo of nondestructive testing. He has been responsible for the direction and management of several major projects. He has distinguished himself by serving as Section Chairman and Director of the AWS and ASNT.
Present Principal Associate Engineer, Nondestructive Testing
- 1978 - Present Assistant Vice President, Corporate Consultant / Metals, Radiation Safety
. Officer for Carolinos. Responsible for the development of new techniques and services. Responsible to the Director of Engineering for.
the approval of all NDE procedures established in the Engineering Procedures Manual. Responsible to the Director of Engineering for opproval of all NDE Level 111 condidates.
1976 - 1978 Manager of NDE Services - Charlotte Branch, Low Engineering Testing Company. Monoged nondestructive testing services for the District.
Responsible for Virginio and Carolinos.
Project Manager, Law Engineering Testing Company. Administered and O 1972 - 1975 controlled radiographic, magnetic particle, and dye penetrant investigo-tions for the Grunswick Steam and Electric Plant. Responsible for the supervision of up to 25 engineering technicions.
1968 - 1972 Monoger of the Nondestructive Testing Department, Georgio Division, Low Engineering Testing Company. Administered and controlled all work which included radiography, ultrasonic, and magnetic particle investigation, dye penetrant tests and in general, all metal inspection in building and construction.
1964 - 1967 Assistant to Chief of Operations, United States Public Service Commission.
1 Certifications / Registrations Professional Engineer, North Carolino and New York Level til ASNT certification in ultrasonic, radiographic, liquid penetrant and magnetic particle testing.
Professional Associations American Welding Society - post Section Chairman cnd Director American Society for Nondestructive Testing - post Section Director American Society of Mechanical Engineers O American Institute of Steel Construction American Society for Metals Numerous technical committees and task forces TERA _ CORPORATION
ROBERT A. RENEAU Associate Engineer, Nondestructive Testing Education E.C.E. Georgio Tech Summary of Experience Mr. Reneau hos ten years experience in the creas of nondestructive examination and material testing. He has been responsible for the direction and supervision of engineers and technicians performing radiographic, magnetic particle, liquid penetront, and ultrasonic evoluotions on several major industry and nuclear projects.
Present Associate Engineer, Nondestructive Testing, TERA Corporation.
1980 - Present Engineer, Law Engineering Testing Company. Technical responsibility for metals services of Charlotte, North Carolina branch.
197S - 1980 Service Engineer, Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Provided technical assistance during disassembly, reassembly, and operation of power generation equipment including steam turbines and generators for utility and industrial customers in U.S. and abroad. In addition to technical responsibilities, duties included supervision, scheduling and cost accounting.
1974 - 197S Projact Manager, Law Engineering Testing Company. Responsible for supervision of engineering technicians performing radiographic, magnetic particle, and dye penetrant evoluotions during construction of Brunswick Steam Electric Plant.
1973 - 1974 Branch Engineer, Law Engineering Testing Company. Technical responsibilities for soil and foundation engineering activities including the test pile programs and foundation investigations for the LMFBR.
Certifications / Registrations Professional Engineer, North Carolino Level II ASNT certification in radiographic, magnetic particle, liquid penetrant and ultrasonic testing. .
Professionci Assoications American Welding Society American Society for Metals The American Institute of Plant Engineers O
TERA CCGPORATION
O oai"w xi'coae Associate Senior Guolity Engineer EDUCATION I B.S. , University of Tennessee .
Mechanical Engineering University of Missouri U.S. Navy Nuclear Power School
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Kilgore has over twenty-six years of nuclear power experience in the orecs of quality assurance, construction, stortup, and operations. His operations experience extends from Naval prototype and power reactors, through University Test Reactor and Commercial Reactors. He has over nine years experience in quality systems with TVA, where he wrote, audited, and trained others in the quality discipline. Certified Lead Auditor, ANSI N45.2.23.
EXPERIENCE Present Associate Senior Quality Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1981 - Present Independent Stortup Engineer, Waterford-3 SES, certified Level II (UNID Responsible for the development and implementation of a O Group).
program to assign a unique identification descriptive number for each mechanical system, volve, or component at Waterford-3. Research and I coordinate startup operations and maintenance for documentation and history relating to unique identifiers as input to plant operation: manual procedures and drawings.
1980 - 1981 Quality Assurance Engineer, TVA. Assigned to Chattanoogo office to provide general engineering support and inspection supervision for spe-cial projects. Responsible for correspondence, evoluotions, vendor l selection, code compliance, and contract conformance. Developed on l
Auditor Training program and on inspection Training program; imple-mented both programs.
1978 - 1980 Quality Assurance Evoluotor, TVA. Assigned to Chattanoogo Office of
. Power for auditing and evoluoting Quality Assurance programs of sup-pliers, operating plants, plants under construction, and various other TVA organizations in support of TVA's nuclear plants and power projects. As Audit Team Leader, conducted audits, trained auditors, and prepared audit reports, evoluotions, and follow-up. Develop:H quidelines for audit checklist preparation. Interfaced with NRC; provided pre-oudit and post-cudit representation for QA during NRC oudits.
1975 - 1978 Guclity Assurance Engineer, TVA. Assigned to Sequoyoh Nuclear Plant as Lead Auditor for construction activities. Formulated audit plans; responsible for turnover package documentation review, and audit of all construction activities. Vendor and subcontractor QA program audits.
3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
-- - , . , -- n g , w-- y, - ---+,e s . --
Q ORIN W. KILGORE Page 2 Responsible for Certification Program whereby Quality Control Engi-neering Inspectors were certified to appropriate levels for performing inspections and audits of construction procedures and activities.
1972 - 1975 Assistant Unit Operator, TVA. Assigned to Sequoyoh Nuclear Plant for training and for plant startup duties. Functioned as startup engineer while engaged in studies for cold licensing. Reviewed system descrip-tions, operating procedures, and test procedures. Wrote system operating and test procedures. Performed checkout and walkdown of systems under construction and during testing, inspected systems for compliance to code, design, and operational requirements. Assisted with system lineup for integrated testing.
1967 - 1972 Senior Reactor Operator at the University of Missouri's Research Reactor Facility, a 10 MW pressurized, water moderated reactor. (AEC licensed, Senior Reactor Operator). Trained new operators, supervised operations, maintenance, and periodic testing of the reactor and its supporting equipment. Kept records of operations, and ensured that operations were in compliance with the licensing requirements.
Reviewed cnd wrote operating and test procedures. Assisted in develop-
. ing the list of material and equipment necessary to upgrade the Reactor from 5 MW to 10 MW in compliance with AEC's Licensing Specifications.
Helped write installation and testing procedures for the new equipment,
-) helped install and supervise testing of pipes, pumps, motors, volves, heat exchangers, and instrumentation.
O 3/83/1 TERA CORPORATION
, - - - , , , - - - - - , _ _ . - _ . - , ,- - =
l O WittiAM D. eRyoR Associate Senior Quality Engineer EDUCATION B.S. Chemistry, Old Dominion University
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Pryor has over twenty years experience in nuclear power. His background includes piant chemistry, radiography, plant testing, test supervision, training, quality assurance, and technical writing. He is experienced in Navy nuclear plant constructinn, testing and start-up, construction, quality assurance, and operations. He has developed off-normal, emergency, and operating procedures for nuclear operations deportments. He has spent the last eight years in consulting copocities. He holds ANSI N45.25, tevel lli, and ASOC Certifications.
EXPERIENCE Present Associate Senior Quality Engineer, TERA Corporation.
l 1982 - Present Independent Project Engineer (Waterford 3 SES). Writes and revises operations procedure, surveillance procedures, off-ncrmal, and emer-Q gency procedures with specific regard to human factors in routine tasks and in response to obnormal symptoms.
1981 - 1982 Quality Engineer (William H. Zimmer NPS). Responsible for overview cf construction progress, construction turnover, nonconformance reports, and procedure review. Reviewed construction turnover packages, met with Construction Manager and Nuclear Vice President weekly for Start-up coordination. Certified to Level til for review of nonconfor-mances and procedures. Material Review Board member. Training Coordinator and Certification Coordinator for QA Department.
1976 - 1981 Senior Engineer. Performed preliminary work for A/E Plant Test and Operators Group, N-Stamp (ASME). Assigned to Guatemolo for power plant start-up, test and operations (advisor); to Saudi Arabia os Results Engineer for 800 MW fossil plant 2,400 MW (units); Quality Control Supervisor, wrote I&C. Training manual, wrote contract proposals, job descriptions, operations, quality and maintenance monuc!s. Assigned to Department of Energy.
1974 - 1976 Mechanical Star't-Up Engineer (Salem Units I and 2). Mechanical Test Engineer on Unit I; Construction Engineer on Unit 2. Wrote start-up testing on selected systems. Assisted in RCS Cold Hydro, Hot function-als testing for commercial operations on Unit I; Construction Engineer for I&C on Unit 2.
1968 - 1974 Shift Test Engineer, U.S. Navy, ossigned to USS Nimitz. Supervised O * *res d a re'io" '" " eroavi re" a e">
r om shir* otr => a = =*="
l l
3/83/l TERA CORPORATION __ _
t-
O wiui^* o i'avoa eage 2 of Mechanical Test Engineers and Electrical Test Engineers, crafts, and administrative support. Also had been assigned to More Island Naval Shipyard on loan for second refueling and overhaul and test program for USS Long Beach (Nuclear powered cruiser). Assigned for USS Enterprise second refueling, overhaul, and test program. Wrote test procedures, test operating procedures.
CERTIFICATIONS Level 111 (ANSI N45.2.6) Mechanical Level 111 (ANSI N45.2.6) Piping Level 111 (ANSI N45.2.6) Electrical Level 111 (ANSI N45.2.6) Instrumentation Certified Quality Engineer (ASGC) June,1982 ,
O .
t O
3/83/1 g
TERA CORPORATION
.__ .~_
--- ,e
.y y.- , - -- - #w- .- .+-c. - ,-- - - - - -- - -- e r-,--w- 'rww &vw--
O PREoERiCx ^. eELLERiN Associate Quality Engineer EDUCATION Management /QA Engineering University of Rhode Island Monogement/QA/QC Engineering Thomas Valley State Technical College Graduate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers School
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Pellerin hcs over twenty years experience in all facets of developing, implementing, monitoring, supervising, and evoluoting nuclear QA/QC programs. He was responsible for the development and administration of an on-site construction completion control program for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Plant, as well as quality and audit piens for Mexican and South African nuclear projects.
EXPERIENCE i
l Present Associate Quality Engineer, TERA Corporation.
1982 Field QA Supervisor, Mercury Company Co. of Norwood, Inc. Respon-sible for the installation of instrument control systems at Waterford-3 Q Nuclect Power Station for Louisiono Power & Light.
1981 - 1982 Field QA Engineer, Gilbane Building Company. Provided construction management on EXXON New Facilities Project.
1980 - 1981 Field QA Supervisor, Pullman . Power Products. Monitored power piping fabricotton and installation at A.W. Vogtle Nuclear Power Station for l Georgio Power Company.
1980 Manager of QA, Zurn industries. Responsible for the design and construction of naturd! draft and mechanical draft cooling towers for various nuclear and fossil fueled power plants.
1979 - 1980 Manager of GA, Mercury Company of Norwood. Supervised the design, fabrication, and instaliation instrumentation rocks and panels for various nuclear and fossil fueled power plants.
1977 - 1979 Senior Construction Engineer, Stone & Webster Engineering Company.
Responsible for the development and implementation of on-site Con-struction Completion Control Program and construction monogement at Nine Mile Point, Unit 2, for Niagoro Mohawk Power Company, r
O 3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
e --
g- , - - - -
yy_- , _ _ . , . , _ , _,_ _ _
O PaeDeniCx 4. eeuenlN eeee 2 1976 - 1977 Construction GA/GC Analyst and Lead Auditor, Gilbert Associates. '
Performed on-site audits at Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant for compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix 8. Also involved in quality programs for Loguono Verde Nuclear Power Plant and a South African ,
Project.
PROFESSIONAL DATA Professional Engineer, State of California 4
O 2
e O
3/83/l TERA CORPORATION
1 i
l l
PETER S. ANDERSEN l Associate Mechanical Engineer i
EDUCATION Ph.D. Stanford University M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Technology of Denmark
SUMMARY
OF EXPERIENCE i Dr. Andersen has over fifteen years of experience in nuclear power specializing in the l fields of heat transfer and fluid dynamics. He has worked extensively with computer codes and has produced numerous publications on computer modeling and dynamic l analysis.
EXPERIENCE
- Present Associate Mechanical Engineer, TERA Corporation.
I 1981 - Present Vice President, Dynotrek, Inc.
1978 - 1981 Independent Consultant, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Respon-sibilities included planning the strategy for ossessment of best estimate O LWR (Light Water Reactor) Systems codes sponsored by the NRC.
Required on intimate knowledge of the modeling .'n the codes, and of the ovalloble world-wide dato base. Also coordinated U.S. contribution to the International Standard Problem Exercise and represented the Com-l mission's interests in various international projects (Morviken and NORHAV).
1972 - 1978 Group Leader, Riso National Laboratory, Denmark. Responsibilities l Included work within the fields of heat transfer and fluid dynamics
( generally relating to safety problems with water cooled reactors. Pro-jects included experimental and theoretical Investigation of annular film flow and high quality CHF, development of a dynamic subchannel code, and theoretical investigation of basic models for two-phase flow. Other responsibilities included alternative energy systems, particularly wind energy systems. Wrote handbook on the design of large wind energy
! systems.
Advisor, Institute of Technology of Denmark (DTH). Advised Ph.D.
students and external examiner at the Laboratory for Fluid Mechanics at the Institute of Technology.
1966 - 1968 Engineer, Riso National Laboratory, Denmark. Porticipated in the design and experimental work regarding a Boiling Heavy Water Reactor project. Also developed a large computer code for onelysis of transient beat conduction by means of the finite element method.
O 3/83 TERA CORPORATION
O eerens.^"Dessen Page 2 1963 - 1966 Engineer, sud-Aviation (now Aerospatiale), France. Was engaged in
, theoretical and experimental cerodynamic work on the CONCORDE SST.
The responsibilities included the simulation of the engines on supersonic models, automatic numericci analysis of wind tunnel results, cnd stabil-ity onelyses, i
O
'O 3/83 h
TERA CORPORATION
~
'*'"W"r __,_. _ _ _ _