ML20117F173
| ML20117F173 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/04/1983 |
| From: | Greenwell R, Marshall R EBASCO SERVICES, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20117F125 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-205 ASP-IV-70, NUDOCS 8505130157 | |
| Download: ML20117F173 (11) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ . _ _ .--
ERASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED i f"'I WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO 3 4
FROCEDURE FOR:
' A*
HANDLING OF ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY NOTICES ASP-IV-70 ISSUE
SUMMARY
B RDIARKS f
) ISSUE /DATE PREPARED AFFROVED 5 ..D- ,
Revised 5.3, 6.3.2.1, 6.3.2.2, g Draft 6.3.2.3, 6.3.2.4, 6.3.2.5, c 9/13/83 R.E. rhenwell. 6.3.2.6, 6.3.2.7, 6.3.2.8, g 6.3.2.9, 6.3.2.10, 6.3.2.11,
- u 6.3.3.
z Added 6.3.2.5.1, 6.3.2.12, .
S ;6.3.2.13, 6.3.2.14, 7.3 E
h m D Issue [ *
{ reenwell . Marsha 1 10/4/83 R.E.
I8 c-I
!! n r_t-. O ,, _,,s . c.
- .c.
m i- e ! ,h: ;m(.s,:v
. L .*
i,*.nr i tj,r ,.s
~ 8 :
~
ac -%.._
M g
E. ,
$i f0"0.?AVl[n se</;, , ;j ' n N; n.: ! j/
%l: :. t I t
g g51g 7 841105
-g BERNABE84-205 PDR ronM NO. AS?-III-1-3 (10-13-75) m
e.
7 IRLSCO SERVICES INCORPORAT:lD BAEEEFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - U:,*IT .D 3
( l.. .
4 FEDCEDURE FOR:
MOCEDURE ,WII:
EAlmLING OT ENGINEERING DISCREFANCY NOTICES ASF-IV-70 i
235UE.5120fARY s
y m
i MIP* T *l 'TD l 1MT f T5 a vr. /DA"! - - -
g ng.
- E Draft 12/3/80 9, gg ,g, l
&A~
l ~
i l .
i 2-10-81 I. . iNA'O V. K1 sin B..J. M11hiser es
>= { '
- h. N M "B" -
Delete 4.7;6.3.2.7;1, Draft V. Klein
] -
6.3.2.7.2, 6.3.2.9.1 and 7.3; Revise 6.1.1, 6.3.2.6,
- s 6.3.2.7, 6.3.3 and 7.2.
! 2 B ISSUE f,[Klein . J. F11hiser t'
5 6/18/82 .V . /
E ~
) A,3 e
g "C" Add 5.5. 6.3.2.6; a . cua :L"
- i o Draft Revise 6.1.1,6. 3. 2. 3,6. 3. 2. t. ,
E 10/4/82 y 6.3.2.5,6.3.2.7 y Renumber 6. 3.2.6, 6. 3.2.7, ;
l 3 6.3.2.S. 6. 3.2.9, ,'
o 6.3.2.10, 6.3.2.11 i
l 'fMTGe Attachment 7.1 F., . Filhiser C Issue V. Klein
, 10-22-82 ,
N m
fome no.. AsF-TII-1-3 (10-13-75)
-,-,..,--,.-n---.- __,-,_,..,.__.
EBASCO .5ERVICES INCORPORATED NO.. ASP-IV-ZO 1 6 ISSUE: D C'ATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PAGE: OF ..
D 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to establish a criteria for implementing and maintaining Engineering Discrepancy Notices (EDN's). ~
2.0 SCOPE ,
2.1 This procedure shall apply to safety and non-safety related items and services at the Construction site.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 None.
. I 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Discrepancy - A deviation from specified requirements (including procedures) that can be readily corrected in ac'cordance with
- standard approved operating procedures or specifications based on ]
good engineering practices. Discrepancies do not reanize an al=herste engineering evaluation or_ disposition for correction.
'They are' deviations from good engineering practice and procedures. .
4.2 Inspector - A qualified person whose duties include the verification of quality related activities or installations. For the purposes of this Procedure Inspector shall mean Engineering Inspector.
. 4.3 Inspection - A phase of quality control which by means of examination, observation, or measurement determines tha c,onformance of items or services or predetermine quality ,
requirement.
- 4.4 Nonconformance - A cendition in characteristic, documentation or I-procedure which renders the quality of an items or service inacceptable or indeterminate. Examples of nonconformances include: physical defects, tatt f ailures, (n, correct or
. An, adequate"{Utumentation, or deviation from prescribed inspection ,
or test procedures.
e e
g>'
m 'l u
P '
ESA5CO .5ERVICES INCORPORATED NO.. ASP-IV-7,0 ISSUE: D WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PAGE:
2 OF 6
, .q e
4.5 Safety-Related Item - Any item designated by Ebasco Engineering in accordance with the guidelines estdblished by the Ebasco Licensing Department, to be Safety Class 1, 2, 3 Seismic Class I or Electrical Class IE, and any other items as designated by the Licensing Department and indicated as safety-related in the PSAR or FSAR.
4.6 Specification - A set of requirements to be satisfied by a product or material. ,
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The Senior Resident Engineer (SRE) or his designee shall have
- overall responsibility for preparation and implementation of this l
procedure. ,
5.2 The Engineering Inspector under the direction of the discipline -
Construction Engineer shaIT Te responsible for inspection and j
documentation of work performed under this procedure.
, ~
t
[ 5.3 The Construction Administrative Engineer or his designee is responsible for coordination and maintenance of'EDN's.
- D i .
3 5.4 The quality A surance Site Supervisor or his designee is rasgans,ible i
- for (etermining if an h o be uggraded to a Nonconformance ;
Report. i I 5.5 The Ebasco Site Support Engineering (ESSE) Project Engineer or his 8 designee is responsible for. evaluating the recommended disposition / disposition as required by this procedure.
.t I i 1 .
6.0 PROCEDURE .' l f 6.1 Introduction .
I f 6'.1.1 Inspection activities at the Construction site shall be 3
perf orn.ed by < Engineering inspectors who have not ;
i.
performed the activity to be inspected. l-6.1.2 Inspections of items, materials or structures shall be performed for each work operation where necessary to
- assure quality. All inspections shall be performed to 8 verify compliance with pertinent design instructions, procedures, specifications, drawings, manufacturer's i* requirements, applicable codes and regulatory
' requirements.
l l
l
+ .
. f
\
l d
i ESASCO . SERVICES INCORPORATED NO.. ASP-IV-7,0 3 6 ISSUES D CATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PACE: OF y 'l 6.2 Inspection 6.2.1 Inspections under the scope of this procedure shall be visual.
. 6.2.1.1 hkaanship shall conform to code, project /
specifications and industry standards.
6.2.1.2 h erials shall conform to specification requirements.
6.3 Discrepancy Notices 6.3.1 Any deviation from requirements discovered during an
' inspection shall require corrective action by the l responsible individual. _ Notices of a deviation in j quality shall be documented by the Eng N Q Jn_spector and afgroved r by the appropriate Discipline i Engineer.
6.3.2 A deviation in quality as defined in Paragraph 6.1.2 shall be reported and processed as follows:
- 6.3.2.1 Discrepancies which are detected during D inspection shall be reported on an EDN, (Form No. j ASP-IV-70 attached) as soon as the j descrepant condition is identified.
D 6.3.2.2 Once the Engineering Inspector has provided the description of the discrepancy on the form, the original EDN shall be forwarded to the Construction Administrative Support ,
Dgpartment where the Construction a Administrative Engineer, or his designee, j shall assign the EDN a unique number.
6.3.2.3 The Construction' Administrative Support i D Engineer, or his designee, shall maintain a icg l
8 g
(Form No. ASP-IV-70-2) for the assignment of EDN l-numbers and tracking their current status. When an EDN number is assigned, the Construction
. Administrative Engineer, or his designee, shall immediately forward a copy of the EDN to the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor to initiate any required equinment/ system tagging by QC personnel.
The Construction Administrative Support Engineer, or his designee shall retain a second copy of the EDN for filing and return the original to the Engineering Inspector.
ESASCO . SERVICES INCORPORATED N O.. ASP-IV-7,0 ISSUE <: D WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PACE: ' OF 6 . . .
9 D. 6.3.2.4 The Engineering Inspector may either provide
. the recommended disposition himself or forward the EDN to the approp'riate discipline Resident Engineer for recommended
. disposition. Once the recommended disposition has been completed, the EDN shall be forwarded to the appropriate disc 1911ne Senior Resident Engineer, or his designee, ,
for disposition.-
D 6.3.2.5 After the Senior Resident Engineer, or Mis designes, has provided the disposition, he shall indicate to whom the EDN is to be referred for corrective action, or whether an ESSE evaluation is required. (An ESSE evaluation is !
required whenever the disposition recommends or accepts a deviation from approved _ design l criteria.) ^ ,
6.3.2.5.1 An EDN for either safety or D
non-nafety related items may, at the discretion of the' Senior Resident Engineer, be forwarded to the ESSE i Proj ect Engineer for
- evaluation / concurrence of the i recommended disposition regardless of design criteria applicability.
D 6.3.2.6 When an EON requires an ESSE evaluation, the dispositioned copy shall be returned to the Construction Administrative Engineer, or his designee, who will log the EDN, make one copy for the file, and forward the ' original to the j ESSE Project Engineer. I i
3 6.3.2.7 The ESSE Project Engineer, or his l D designee, shall provide an evaluation of I I the recommenced disposition. In the i.
event that ESSE rejects the recom= ended :
disposition, ESSE shall provid, a i
- disposition for the EDN and obtain the Senio l
- Resident Engineer's concurrence. Upon g
- completion of his evaluation, the ESSE ,
Project Engineer, or his designee, shall i forward the evaluated EDN to the Construction I Administrative Engineer, cr his designee, fet !
further processing. l e
+ . .
~
EBASCO . SERVICES INCORFORATEC NO.. asp-IV-70 _
PAGE: 5 OF
, ISSUE: o WATERFORO STEAM ELCCTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 6- . l D 6.3.2.8 The Construction Administrative ,
Engineer, or his designee, shall now review the EN to ensure that it is administratively correct. (i.e., pages are numbered correctly, attachments referred to are present, etc.). Any discrepancies shall be resolved and a copy of the EN with any attachments shall be 8 I
made for the file.
D
'r6.3.2.9 If the E N is safety-related, it shall be Zorwaruso to the qua m y assurance Site Supervisor for his concurrence. If the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor considers the EN to be a g,
{ nonconformance, he shall recommend that a Nonconformance Report be written. When an {
EDN is upgraded to a Nonconformance status, a hold D shall be affixed to the discrepant condition -
'17"Ebasco QC personnel. The EDN, annotated with the Nonconformance Report Number, is returned to f the Construction Administrative Support Department for closure, b
D 6.3.2.10 If the safety related EN is g considered a j nonconformance, the Quality Assurance Site
- Supervisor or his designee shall provide Q. A.
concurrence. The EDN shall be returned to the Construction Administrative Engineer, or his
- designee.
D 6.3.2.11 The Construction Administrative Engineer, or his designee, shall forward a copy of the EDN to the responsible party for corrective action. After corrective action has been laken, the responsible party is to complete the corrective action portion of the form indicating what corrective action vas taken and return the ,
copy cf the EDN to the Construction Administrative j Support Department. The party responsible for the -
- corrective action shall transfer this information and their signature to the original'EDN in the Construction Administrative Support Department.
D 6.3.2.12 The Construction Administrative Engineer, or his designee, shall make one copy of the EDN for the file and transmit the original to the Engineering Inspector for reinspection. Upon completion of reinspection, the Engineering Inspector shall indicate acceptability of the corrective action by checking either " ACCEPT" or " REJECT" and signing and dating the form. The EDN shall be returned to the Construction Administrative Support Department and if the corrective action was accepted, the EDS will be considered closed.
EaASCO .5ERVICES INCORPORATED NO.. ASP ,IV 7,0 6 6 ISSUE: D WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION '- UNIT NO. 3 PAGE: OF e . 7 D 6.3.2.13 If the Engineering Inspector " rejects" the corrective action, he shall return the EDN, with cossments explaining the rejection, to the Construction Administrative Engineer, or his
. designee.
D 6.3.2.14 The Construction Administrative Engineer, or his designee, shall process the rejected EDN per ,
paragraph 6.3.2.11 adding an addendum form (Attachment 7.3) to the original and copy.
6.3.3 When the EDN has been closed, the Construction D
- Administrative Engineer, or his designee, shall transmit the original EDN to the Quality Assurance Records Department i for filing. A copy of the closed EDN shall be maintained in the Construction Administrative Support Department file.
7.0 ATTACHMENTS 7.1 Engineering Discrepancy Notice, Form No. ASP-IV-70-1.
7.2 Engineering Discrepancy Notice Log, Form No. ASP-IV-70-2. l t
i D
7.3 Addendum Form, Form No. ASP-IV-70-3.
e i .
I 4
2 1
e 9
e e
a e
l
+ - WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 4- '
1983 - 1165 W INSTALLATION - UNIT NO. 3
~
ENGINEERING DISCEEPANCY NOTICE
- . . . **g ,
EDN NO. DATE Attachment 7.1 Safety Related Non-Safety i
Fara ASF-IV-70-1
' 14C Class Code
.i Item Description Location Systen F.O. Contract Number Drawing / Spec. No.
- 1. Discrepancy
Description:
Engineer Inspector Supervisor
- 2. Recommended Disposition:
(
Provided By Date ,
- 3. Disposition:
i r Senior Resident Engineer Date l f
i Referred To:
4 ESSE Evaluation:
I 1
Lead ESSE Engineer Date
- 5. QA Concurrence
i i
! Site Quality Assurance Supervisor Date i i
- 6. Corrective Action Taken: ;
i i
1 Organisation: Signature , Date l
- 7. Reinspection Remarks:
i s l i
! Mpt Reject Engineer Inspector Date j ',
1 I
1 <
1 4
- - -- - _ - - -,.,,, - -,--.__-..-,..,--n-_-_--_------,.......A-
____ __ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ~ . _ . _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______ __ _ _ ___ _ _ __
Y i i j i j i I I I l l j l 3j g I
I g
I i
g i
I I
l g
i I
I I
g i
i I
I
- g g I g i g ; ; g i
j, .a I I I I g i i g I
I I l I I I I I I
- 4 I g g l 1 I I
I
~ c I I I I I
! l ! I" ! l ! ! ! I I l t I i
i'E n I l I
l I
l I
l I
l I
l I
l I
l I
l I
I l l I
I l
I I
l I
l I
I l
I i
4 I I I I I ' '
0 m I
I I
I I I l l I I l l l 3
I I
^
3 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I l I
- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I 2 I I
I I I I I l- 1 I I I I I I I I
$ I I I I I I I I I i I
" I l t i I I I
, I l 1 l l l 1 l I I I I 'I I I i I .
I I I s I I
I I
I I I l i I I I I I I d I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I l o I I l' I I - 1 l l l I
- I I I l i
. I I I I i I i l I I
' I I I O I -
I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I 1 E I I I I I I I I I I i E I I I I l- 1 I I I I 1 I I I I l E I I l l l 1 I I I I I I '
I I I I l l , I l I I I -
1 I 1 I i l 6 I I I I I i I i I I I I ca I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I i l l l l l 1 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I I 'l l I I I l
- I I I I I I i 1 1 l l l I I I I I I
I I
! $ I I I I l i i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 i G i l 1 I I I I I
! I I I I I C I I I I I I I I I I ,
I I I I f E
I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I~ 'l i I I I I I l I I I l 1 I I I I I I l i I l l l l I I I I l l l 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I I i l I I I I I I i
I I I I I I I
I I I I I l l 1 I I i l l I I l i I I I J l
- I I I I I I I I I I i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i 5 I I I I I I I I I I 1 C I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '
i I
3 I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I 0 I I I 'l i I I I I I I I I I l I
, d 1 I I l l l I I I I I I I I
- I I l
I I I l- 1 I I I I I I I I I l l . I I I I i 1 1 I l 1 1 1 I I I I I 4 I I I I J l i I I I I I I I I I I l l l 4 I ) 1 I I I i I l :l l t 1 I I I I
, i t i l
, e i 4 i i t i 1 l .
! E .
! B
.a, *
-,--_--m,_,.-- m__m r .-m m ._-,_ . . , - - , _ . . - m__,, -~-
ADDENDUM
- r. .
- Page 2 EDN-6a.) Corrective Action Taken:
1 i
E Organisation: Signature Date
)1 l
i i
]
7a.) Reinspection Remarks:
e Accept Reject Engr. Ir.spector Date a
t 1
i 4
. b I
I t
i f
l t
4 h
l 2,
i
! i
! l 4
3 1
i i
I
~
4 FORM ASP-IV-70-3 !
I i
d I
!^
.-,-----,-....-.--,-,__., ,_.._, ---- ..._---,__-- _ -n
,, . n.,, - , , - - . . _ _ - - . - _ . - _ _ , , - , - - , . .
. ,-i