ML20117F392
| ML20117F392 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/1980 |
| From: | Martin D, Pendergrast K FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC. (SUBS. OF FISCHBACH CORP.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20117F125 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-205 QAP-104W3, NUDOCS 8505130224 | |
| Download: ML20117F392 (10) | |
Text
1 s ',
J.
e AP-104W3 6
t REV:
1 DATE: 12.-15-80l
~
i PAGE 1 'OF S QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE E8ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING CORRECTIVE ACTION Ty's Occumentis:
g a===se va m,c 0**==**"*C*""****
i-OEY o,me.
O w n
.n n
n
==this e.eumont. whn w
==
isiew.n.
in n.
86 fr.m RelDi itY
- " 75 1 0$1 0UISIANA POWER S LIGHT COMPANY 1
in,iet
.ac. *nn v= Pw 'NATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
- [:$8#
& ; hY-UNIT NUMBER 3 Date: lb 14-8 0 CONTRACT W3-NY-12 1
.i PREPARED BY FISCHBACH ~AND
- MOORE, INC.0RPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE GROUP DALLAS, TEXAS FISCHBACH AND MOORE CONTRdl. LED COPY No.
oJ l
j ApenovAL oATE Prepared By:
May 27, 1977 0.A.
Manacer 8505130224 841105
/
/
~
QAP-104w3 REV:
1
"/
DATE:
12-15-80
.t. 6-PAGE 2 OF 8
i
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE 1.0 PURPOSE 3
2.0 SCOPE 3
3.0, REFERENCES 3
3.1 Federal Regulations 3
3.2
.AmericanNationalStandardsYnstitute 3
3.3
-Fischbach 6 Moore, Incorporated 4
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4
5.0 PROCEDURE 5
)
6.0 EXHIBITS 8
REVISION RECORD 0
Original Release May 27, 1977 1
Revised Para. 5.7 p~er Ebasco December 15, 1980' comment's.
4
'~
~
e l
4
,--n.
.-nn-,
o (kjklI" 104W3 REV:
1 0
(-
DATE:
12-15-80 1
PAGE 3 OF 8
1.0 PURPOSE ~
This: procedure establishes the requirements and defines the methods to be employed for the identification, documentation and reporting of conditions that are adverse to quality to the appropriate levels of management and to assure that, in the case of significant conditions, the causes of such con-ditions are determined and that adequate corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence.
t 2.0- ' SCOPE The requirements of this procedure are applicable to all con-ditions adverse to quality that occur during procurement, in-sta11ation, examination and testing of the power plant el.ectrical construction.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 Federal Regulations (1) 10CFR5'0, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocdssing Plants.
3.2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
(1)
N45.2 (1971), " Quality Assurance Program Require-ments for Nuclear Pawer Plants".
(2)
N45.2.10 (1973), " Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions" O
e.
O a s
(I$kE "
104W3 REV:
1
/
DATE:
12-15-80 PAGE 4 OF 8
- i 3.3 Fischbach and Moore, Incorporated
~
(1)
Project Quality Assurance Manual for Electrical Installations at Nuclear Power Plants.
(2)
QAP-103W3, " Processing and Control of Noncon-formances".
(3)
QAP-105W3, "Stop Work Orders" (4)
QAP-20lW3, "The Control, Filing and Maintenance of Records".
t 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 The Project Q.C. Manager shall be responsible for issu-ance, processing and contr.ol of Corrective Action Re-quests (CAR's, Exhibit 1) and issuing Stop Work Orders (Reference-QAP-105W3) when such action is deemed neces-sary and justified by the severity of the adverse condi-tions.
4.2 The Purchasing Agent shall be responsible for coordina-tion of Corrective. Action Requests with the responsib]c suppliers and subcontractors when adverse conditions have resulted.from procured items and services.
4.3 The Chief Engineer shall be responsible to investigate, identify the cause and assure completion of corrective action as required to correct design or procedural rel-ated problems which could or have resulted in signifi-cant conditions adverse to quality.
^
o (k$k!I" 104W3 REV:
1 l
("
. DATE:
12-15-80 V -
PAGE 5 0F 8
4.4 The project Superintendent shall be re'sponsible for~
~ l initiating corrective action when notified of improper work'metliods, failure to follow procedures or instruc-tions, use of improper tools or similar conditions.
5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 During review of IR's, NCR's, Checklists, test data, aud reports and other pertinent data, and evaluation of non-conformance ' conditions (Reference QAp-103W3), the Q.C.
i Supervisor, Documentation Supervisor, Electri, cal Q.C.
Engineer and project Q.C. Manager shall identify sig-nificant and/or repetitive conditions that are adverse to quality of the facility.
The project Q.C. Manager shall evaluate these conditions and determine the need for formal corrective action.
A CAR shall be initiated when one or more of the following type conditions exist:
A single significant problem or problem area exists a.
which could adversely affect the quality of safety-related work,
~
b.
Repetitive defects due to the same cause or repeated submittal of material, equipment or installations fot inspection which are unacceptable.
Drawings,' specifications, procedures, instructions c.
or other documentation nonconformances.that may, or have adversely affected quality.
2;w
.c',-
~
(gj(FD.
104N3 REV:
1
/
DATE:
12-15-80 1
PAGE 6 OF 8
5.~ 2 The CAR shall provide adequate detail to concisely' des-_
cribe the condition and the corrective action required.
,The CAR shall be addressed to the cognizant management of the department or organization charged with the res-ponsibility for determining the cause and providing ade--
quate and. effective action to prevent recurrence of the condition.
A reasonable date for the addressee to res-pond to the CAR shall be established and the CAR shall be forwarded to the Q..C. Records Center.
5.3 The G.C. Records Clerk shall assign a control number to the CAR, enter the CAR on the Status Log (Exhibit 2) and file a copy in the CAR Suspense File.
Copies of the CAR shall be distrib.uted to the.Q.C. Supervisor and the othe personnel as directed by the Project Q.C. Manager.
The original' copy of the CAR shall be forwarded to the addre see for action.
5.4 Upon receipt of copies of the CAR, the Q.C. Supervisor shall initiate action for examination of identical items or similar conditions.
When appropriate, the Project, Q.C. Manager shall. be notified and the ' CAR shall be amen to include the additional nonco'nforming items and/or ad-verse conditions.
5.5 The individual responsible for providing corrective actii
,,g shall document on the CAR the probable cause and the ac-tion that has been or is planned to be implemented to pri h
,0. -
I.,
s,.
-~
(k$kEI" 104W3 4
REV:
1
/
DATE:
12-15-80 o
PAGE 7 OF 8
vent recurrence of the reported condition.
The effect-ive date for implementation of corrective action shall also be documented on the CAR.
The addressee shall sign and date the CAR and return it to the Project Q.C.
Manager.
CAR's that have been addressed to suppliers and/or' subcontractors shall be returned to the Purchas-ing Agent, ' ho shall forward the CAR to the Project Q.C.
w Manager.
t
.In the event tha,t additional time is required to inves-tigate.and determine the cause and corrective action nec:
essary, the addressee shall negotiate a new due date wit the Project Q.C. Manager.
5.6 In the event that a CAR has not been completed and re-turned by the established due date, the Project Q.C.
-e.
Manager shall send a letter to the addressee requesting an immediate response as to the status of the CAR.
CAR responses that are more than 30 days delinquent shall be-reported to the Project Manager, and if deemed necessary' to the Corporate Quality Assurance Manager for appropri-ate management action.
5.7 Upon receipt of completed CAR's, the Project Q.C. Manage shall verify that the corrective action'is adequate to correct the condition and to pre-
~
vent recurrence.
Unsatisfactory CAR responses shall be 9
+.
9
.T.
QAP-104W3 REV:
1
~
DATE:
12-15-80 PAGE 8 OF 8
returned to the addressee for further action.
The Project Q.C. Manager shall check, sign and date sat-isfac' tory CAR's and forward them to the Q.C. Records Center.
5.8 The Q.C. Records Clerk shall update the Status Log, clear the Suspense File and distribute copies of the closed CAR to the original distribution list.
The m
original copy of the closed CAR shall be filed and mai_n-t tained in accordance with QAP-201W3.
6.0 EXHIBITS Form No. FM112 - Corrective Action Request Form No. FM113 - Corrective ~ Action Request Status Log 1
4 0
t e
eY a
.s
.t.#
J
.[
FISCliBACH AND MOORE, INCORPORATEb (EXHIB1T 1) I w
1 CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST CAR No.
4 l
)
Proj ect:
Date Cont,ract/ Job No.:
Page of
Reference:
Drawing No.
Revision j
i Specification No.
Revision Procedure No.
Revision Description of Discrepancy / Corrective Action Required:
i I
j Reported By Project Q.C. Manager Assigned To i
Reply Requested on or before Date Reply / Corrective Action Taken:
4
~
i i
j Assignee:
Date:
Q. C. REVIEW Satisfactory Unsatisfactory - CAR returned for further action:
Date
- ~
. Project Q. C. Manager 1
i ro en...,
- n. u, -
L
L All A D A s 4 i
g CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST e
p.
(CAR)
^
~
STATUS LOG Item Date Date Due
Response
Date l
CAR No.
Affected Initiated Distributed Date Date Approved / Clos a
I j
g 9
i O
4 I
i 6
l i
9 2
f i
l 1
i
)
O e
I
- gg e.
,es s e ge
--- cw w wn... ~.,....~ne,
,,wmm--.
-nv~,
-m.-,
-w--rw -
wv---,v--,
,,.-wer- -.