ML20117F185
| ML20117F185 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/09/1983 |
| From: | Laford H, Marshall R EBASCO SERVICES, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20117F125 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-205 ASP-III-7, NUDOCS 8505130161 | |
| Download: ML20117F185 (16) | |
Text
9 ERASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED o
s-WATERFORD STEAN II.ECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO 3 Fa0CEDURE FOR:
PROCESSING OF NONCONFORMANCES PROCEDURE 'C!BER:
ASP-III-7 6
ISSUE
SUMMARY
i B
_]
ISSUE /DATE PREPARED APPROVED RD! ARKS g
I d u QLa or General Revision E
"J" Draft H. D.
I 12/05/83
) *N'/
fl. E. )
k "J" Issue H. D. La ord rshall
/
l 12/09/83 s
I
{O h -
. ' N.
8
" 'j * ?
".' ' Y ;~,
l
- t,Q j ll.~.['j'q*,7, e
lk.!f f
.E
... g _
I b${fy'Nf! ny;y I
EY j),.'[ [
i 8505130161 041105 PDR FOIA i
//
'Ti roan no. AsF-III-1-3 (10-13-75)
..l.O
~.
e IB&SCO $ERVICES INCORPORATED j
i 4
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO 3 reocEDuRs roR:
PROCESSING OF NONCONFORMANCES PROCEDURE *.RD!BER:
1 AND AUDITS gp
,7 i
ISSUE StD9tARY a
I I
I g
i l
RDtARKS l
APPROVED h
ISSUE /DATE l_
38ttPARED I
YY "G" Draft J. Gutierrez General Rewrite E
7-1-82 i
/( *
"G" Issue
. Gutierrez R.
. Milhiser 7-2-82 g "H" Draft W. Jagger ff WD' "
Revised to raflect change in Quality Assurance ASME 5
5-5-83 III Manual l
Added Attachments 7.9 thru
\\
i if
/
- 7. l!+
I ld (
m/AL,*
\\{
e "H" Issue L. Nj
. Marshall 8-8-83 4
h "I" Draft H.
it
,([r IWised 6.1.1.2, 6.1.2.1 Appendix "A" (15) and i
I
(
f 8-25-83 5
j
/
Addition of Appendix "3" E
h A,/
f or ti "I" Issue H. J, :<unis,pr sh-g 9/6/83j
('
t "J" Draft
. L. W. Jagger Revised 3.9, 4.4, 6.1.1.1, 10/6/83 )
6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.4, 6.1.2.1, 6.1.5.2, 6.1.5.3; THE "J" DRAlT PREPARED BY L. rl. Ji,GCER DATED
}
10/6/83 HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED E f THE "J" DRAFT y j,
- 5
~~
l PREPARED BY H. D. LAFORD DATE D 12/5/83.
5.8.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8.
i
\\
e 5
W paget 30. Asy-III-1-3 (10-13-73) s
-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ -. _,. - -.., - -,,.,. _ _, - _ _ _ _ ' ^ * * '
.c.
s 1
. :,1 ERA',C0 SERVICT.S INCORPORN
- *s I *t
. WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO 3 FROCEDURE FOR: CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURE NUMBER:
ASP -III-7 i
t M
ISSUE
SUMMARY
g L
ISSUE /DATE PREPARED APPROVED RDIARKS
==
I "A" DRAFT M. Wa sh fjok
.i
c~%
y "A" 9 -2 6 -75
. Wa sh J. O. Booth o
(( #M*-s "B" DRAFT F. R. Howard Added Form No. ASP-III-7-3 x
and ASP-III-7-4 and change t
S 3-16-76 8
of responsibilities.
fSs hO*
uy B 4-7-76 F. R. Howa d J. O. Booth "C" DRAIT df Revised Form No. ASP-III-7-3.
7-8-76
- 5. A.
gz j
j g
"C" 7-16-76
. IGdcz J. O. Booth i
8
- e. //
i us W. C. Grig b
y J. R. Iceg/
Made changes-to reflect 2,
"D" DRAFI i
2/10/78
[)
respor.sibilities brought abo t y;
by QA/QC reorganization i
5 "E" DRAFT A Stinsen Cocplete rewrite to incorpo-()
/
/-
rate ASP-III-6, Nonconforma. c 4/7/78
' and ASP-III-9, Q A Audits, e g
"E" 4-20-78 A Stinson J. Crnich QA/QC reorganization.
"F" Draft b
8/14/78 son w
d M
Milhiser' b i
"F" 9-20-78
/AS nson R
7Cr m C i
i FORM No. E-1 (12-12 4)
~
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED NO. ASP-111-7 155UE:
WATERFORO STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PAGE: 1 OF 6 J
O 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 It is required to establish procedures / measures to promptly identify and correct' conditions adverse to quality, such as. failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances with regard to safety related items.
2.0 SCOPE usC
}l 2.1 This procedure establishes measures for the control of safety-related items and services found to be in nonconformance during jE the, construction of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit ua No. 3.
This shall include measures for the reporting, documen,
as tation and resolution of nonconformances and the identification y
and control of nonconforming items.
- ~
2.2 This procedure establishes the interface between Ebasco Departments, ys Contractors and LP&L.
us i
O 2c 2.3 The scope is limited to activities at the Waterford 3 Site.
lE l
- [3 2.4 This. procedure establishes requirements for the following:
f
=u 2.5.1 Implementation of corrective action required as 33 it pertains to Deficiency Notices and Nonconformance Reports, P"
6 2.5.2 Documentation of the status of required corrective action and of inspection to verify that corrective action has (j;
t been implemented.-
c5 Z
2.6 Corrective action required for the resolution of incidents as defined by 10CFR 50.55(e) 'ahd 10CFR 21 shall be implemented in
!(
accordance with Ebasco Company Procedure N-23 and ASP-IV-122, 1
3
.1 C)
U
3.0 REFERENCES
v1
- j~
3.1 10CTR50, Appendix B - Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power F~
Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants.
Z 3.2 ANSI N45.2 - Ouality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear
-~
Power Plants.
O I"
3.3 Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual ETR 1001.
$~
3.4 Ebasco Quality-seurance Manual ASME Section III.
Z 3.5 Control of Receiving, Handling & Storage - WQC-1.
3.6 Inspection & Test Status - WRC-150.
3.7 Handling of Engineering Discrepancy Notices - ASP-IV-70.
b>
4 l
ESASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED NO. ASP-III-7 ISSUE: #
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PAGE: 2 op 6 4
4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Inspection - A documented phase of quality control which by means of examination, observation or measurement determines the con-formance of items or services to predetermined quality require-ments.
4.2 Item - Any level of unit assembly, including structure, system.
I subsystem, component, part or material.
uJOjl 4.3 Nonconformance - A condition in characteristic, documentation or procedure which renders the quality of an item or service un-dj acceptable or indeterminate.
Examples of noncenformances uJ include: physical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate a2 documentation, or deviation from prescribed inspection or test g[
procedures.
4.4 Safety-Related Item - As used in this procedure only, Safety-Related us is defined as, any item designated by Ebasco Engineering, yj in accordance with the guidelines established by the Ebasco sc Licensing Department, to be Safety Class 1, 2, 3. Seismic Class 1 or electrical Class IE and any other items as designated by
[}
the Licensing Department.
f5 4.5 Safety-Related Service - Any service performed that directly affects j[
the quality of a safety-related item.
3r L
4.6 Service - Performance of nuclear safety-related activities, such as design, f abrication, inspection, nondestructive examination, in-y stallation and test.
-c gg 4.7 Verification - An act 'of confirming, substantiating and assuring that an activity or condition has been implemented in conformance 3l vith the specified requirements.
=
.4
~
OU 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES V:
/ 'jE 5.1 The Site Quality Program Manager shall be responsible to:
at 5.1.1 Assure that Nonconformances are reported, in accordance with established procedures,
~~
i us I
2E C3 5.1.2 Assure that corrective action and reinspection are im-E plemented and documented.
<c kj 5.1.3 Prepare a, periodic status report of unresolved Noncon-i Et formances and audit findings.
5.1.4 Shall determine if a stop work order concerning further processing or installation of nonconforming items is necessary.
If so QA is to process the stop work order in I
accordance with QAI-3.
L>
4
.l
, - - - ~.,,,, -,,..
,.,.O..l--,
-w,_, - _,, -
,,w-,,. ~, - - - - --..,, --,,.,,,,, _,,, -.
-.,,_.-,---n-.
,w,
NO. ASE-Ili->
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED PACE: 3 OF 6 WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 J
ISSUE:
The Senior Resident Engineer is responsible to provide or assure that 5.2 other Ebasco Departments or Contractors prepare written disposition instructions for Nonconformance Reports.
5.3 Responsibilities for evaluating Nonconformance Reports are as follow:
ESSE - Design or Engineering items Senior Resident Engineer - Construction Procedure items Quality Assurance Engineering - Quality Assurance Procedure items mc j
5.4 The Ebasco Construction Superintendent shall be responsible to implement required corrective action for work performed by Ebasco 5
forges at the construction site.
w 5.5 The Contractor shail be responsible for implementing assigned U
y corrective action.
5.6 The Ebasco Construction Superintendent shall assure that corrective action is implemented in a timely manner for contractor and Ebasco m
activities, z
i 5.7 Contractors shall be responsible for reporting nonconformances U
detected at the site and transmitting these reports to the Ebasco QA Site Supervisor, in accordance with established O
procedures.
=
5' L
6.0 PROCEDURE b-
<U 6.1 DISCREPANCY NOTICES
~cz t.1.1 Nonconforming items or services detected at the construction site"by Ebasco/ Contractor Quality Control personnel or others are processed as a Discrepancy Notice 7g (DN) for hardware or Discrepancy Report g) for sof tware, 3
E Engineering Discrepancy Notice ( g for Engineering in o
accordance with. established procedures.
U m=
NOTE:
Items discovered to be out-of-tolerance or not to z
routine checkpoints of an inspection specification at
~
process shall not be PROCESSED AS A DN provided:
O The condition is corrected prior to acceptance of the E
a.
4 work.
g C
The work does not proceed beyond the checkpoint until 2
b.
the correction is made.
The cut-of-tolerance condition does not refl'ect c.
on work previously accepted, h
ESASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED NO. ASP-III-7 6
ISSUE:#
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PACE:
OF w _. _.....--.
)
Damage which would affect the integrity of an item shall be classified as a nonconformance and reported by a DN.
6.1.2 DN's issued for contractors work shall be processed in a.ccordance with the contractors approved program.
NONCONTORMANCE REPORTS (NCR) 6.2 _
6.2.1 The Ebasco QA Supervisor shall evaluate the condition mc reported on the Discrepancy Notice {H), Discrepancy Report j
g, Engineering Discrepancy Notice RDJ) or otherwise reported, for issue of an NCR if the conditionIcannotjbe 4
.g.orrected wiJhirtthe scop M approved Engineerine drawines, y
Z w
specirtemeinns,.pr procedur involves items designated V
^ '
) # g(@
E ASME Soci:$on III. -
W N
t Den ph k
6.2.2 In the event an NCR is issued, the nude'i~of the g P Z
Nonconformance Report shall be reccrded under Action Taken pt ' l,
)!
m on the Discrepancy Notice, Discrepancy Eeport, or l
Engineering Discrepancy Notice and the notice shall be 2
considered closed. The closed DN shall be returned to the QC Engineer for logging. Closed Engineering Discrepancy -
M lg :
G Notices shall be returned to the responsible Resident cpg.
( r"j;, :
Engineer.
O:
6.2.3 The applicable trend code numbers shall be deterr.ined and
/-
F recorded on the top of the NCR by the Quality Assurance Engineer.
h 6.2.4 Information copies of the issued NCR sh'all be distributed
~5 to LP&L Construction QA.
Z 6.2.5 NCR numbers shall*be assigned by QA Engineering and NCR's j
tracked thru the use of the Master Tracking System (MTS).
m d
6.2.6 The Senior Resident Engineer, or his designee, shall y
perform the fol. lowing:
m Assign start-up system number to the NCR when
/3 a.
H ap p licable. - - ---
Z b.
Provide the Recommended Disposition.
mz Provide an independent " Evaluation of Disposition" for o
c.
p Construction Procedural items.
d.
/dbtain an " Evaluation of Disposition" from ESSE for
$Z Engineering or Design items.
Update MTS status as appropriate.
e.
f.
Forward NCR's to QA Engineering prior to initiating Corrective Action.
(
ESASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED NO. ASP-III-7
~
s 5
6 ISSUE:
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PACE:
op t
+
p In the event the Evaluation Does not acce [
Note:
the rec ~ommended disposition, the Sr. Resident' Engineer shall ruolve the concerns and I
prepara a revised recomunended disposition.
y 6.2.7 The Ebasco QA Engineer shall perform the following functions:
b
~
..-g d
Review the NCR to determine the need for reportability under 10CFR50.55(e).
I b.
Provide an " Evaluation of DispositionTQ A.
y Procedural items.
s su 8
c.
Review and determine the completeness of the approved g
Disposition relative to inspection and hold points.
l
~
<=
d.
Submit to the Ebasco Authorized Nuclear Inspector for concurrence prior to issue for corrective action for my ASME III items, class 1, 2 or MC.
Z e.
Submit to LP&L for concurrence prior to issue for G
Corrective Action for ASME XI items.
h f.
Forward NCR to the Organization responsible to perform the Corrective Action.
=.
6.3 ACTION h
6.3.1 Organizations / personnel assigned responsibility E
for implementation of the disposition shall i
a)
Monitor the' status of required corrective l
[
action to assure timely completion.
2.
8 b)
Assure that corrective action is accomplished in accordance.with the accepted disposition including U
reinspection.
m
.' =
F-c)
Assure that for nonconformances relating to I
Code items, the Authorized Nuclear Inspector, when he
=
so designates, be provided adequate notice (1 day minimum) through Ebasco Quality Assurance of
.8 repair, rework, retest s.nd/or reinspection so that he p
may witness that which he deems necessary.
6.4 NCR REINSPECTION z
^
6.4.1 Reinspection shall be perforned by Quality Control personnel in accordance with the -requirenents of the disposition.
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED NO. ASP-III-7
~
6 6
ISSUE:
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - UNIT NO. 3 PACE:
OF 4
6.1.2 The Work Package and associated documentation shall contain sufficient detailed information for as-built records and provide traceability to purchase order, material ID, equipment / tools ID, and personnel assigned to accomplish and inspect work.
6.5 NCR CLOSURE I
6.5.1 JUpon completion of corrective action the NCR along with uJ applicable inspection reports and data documenting o
satisfactory correction shall be transmitted to the Ebssee 9 g[
Quality Assurance for closure.
2:
i di l
6.5.'2 U erification of Disposition will be performed by Ebasco V
c2 LQuality Assurance. Field inspection performed for the' gl
(
purpose of verification by the QA Engineer to close NCR shall be optional and performed at the direction of a Lead
<C::
Q.A. Engineer, v1
.....--J uJ m
bh 6.5.3 Partial closure of NCR's to support completion of specific
$i Start-Up Systems and allow testing to proceed may be (3
permitted.
f5 6.5.4 Copies of closed NCR's shall be distributed as folicws:
=
EI a.
Work Package Control u
[*
b.
Construction Administrative Suppor,t Group U
Responsible Lead Resident Engineer
[
25 c.
z d.
LP&L Constru'etion QA z2=
e.
Others as requ, ired CU
}
7.0 ATTACEMENTS v,
'=
12-7.1 Nonconformance Report Form With Instructions
=
7.2 Procedure Flow Diagram ut Z
Y.
p.<>
O Z
ASP-III-7 ATIACBENT 7.2 Page 1 of 6
(.
siis$
seasse amavicas inconeoaavan OuAuss AssunAncs im (3) ESABCO 9 W3 t
4, re me.m (A) CCFTARCTOR #
MONCDNPORMANCE REPORT DtSTRUCTIONS. f5 h 6.i s 3 (2). SUSf (J) TJtEND CODr
.a *=.
e....
. in swasov e
.e is. (4).
(8) w....
.v.
v...v ggy
. ggy
...v
- e....,
..v
.. g7;
- s. ossca PTion OP seOncowPoansAuca '" (ie. i.-.s
- d. s, sn es c.d..c re d d whd.h #
- o. u., c tr.
(9) 1.h d' 5he*'h i! ^**Il**M*I sie uw viai_tv Twe J fl ABu Yun iW r1 m
..m..--
y y t,jn.... L J 100FRZ1 2
n_.e....a u (10) stE ATTACRMENTE (11) rTrut i
2.
.....to...
sas.=
.e.av =... w....
=..c vir6.e..=.=- (2Jj
.. v. in (24)
(12) meCommaMcED Qt3P018 TION "(15)(fwan.de Jh.e.h if Aponcebt.)
i l
l 1
l (16i SET AT"*AC9 MENT R l
= = s... s..
.vua..,...
a...
... =...se.eirien ie.
vers.s..we.=,
o v.
iu (17)
(18)
(19) t i l.
EV ALUATICN OF DISP 054T10M SY ESASCO, REASON FOR ct3PC1tT10H nas (20) i (211 Sir A "AcsninT 0 t V. CO RR ECT1Y1 ACTION "(gh R.9 3'.d u.' R*9 38.d i
l (27) i (22v'.'"O caesaneriaa
/23C ouaury Assuaa ce tres C coa:Tauerica ormai 4
....~.......
ens eas t1 s i
11s
~,a j
- s**ves O. isens
- -) accans9,p asaserso O acc8778b)O a*JacTuo 10 ******(3 A **'* *""
ggJ[ J '*captuo arm ca
..es O acespeso =vw co.wes r l aces *vuo erw co e.es C acespeso erw co==e.es i
T I.
VERSPICATION OP DiSPSSITION (23)Cassu..s.
C aer asauia=="*'
(29)
U" W m eseA n =
nM gar =
a-
ASP-III-7 i.1 Page 2 of 6 PROCESSING OF NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS (Form 6009-11/5-77)
Circled item numbers on the attached sample Nonconformance Report form (6009-11/5-77) correspond to the item numbers listed below:
NUMBERING SYSTEM (1-A)
Nonconformance Reports (NCR's) initiated by Waterford 3 contractors /
vendors are assigned a number consistent with the originator's unique NCR numbering system, and the NCR is then forwarded to Ebasco Site Quality Assurance (QA).
(1-B)
NCR's received from Waterford 3 contractors / vendors or written by.
Ebasco Services, Inc. personnel are assigned an Ebasco NCR number by Ebasco Site QA.
(2)
START-UP SYSTEM NUMBER (S)
The applicable start-up system number (s) will be entered on each NCR by the originator.
(3)
TREND CODE The Ebasco QA Engineer who reviews the NCR will enter the applicable Ebasco QA Trend Code (s) for purposes of the Ebasco QA Quarterly Trend Analysis.
(4)
CLIENT / PROJECT Enter "LP&L Waterford SES Unit No. 3".
-(5)
SUPPLIER / CONTRACTOR
' Enter name of supplier, contractor, or Ebasco Department against whom the NCR is written.
(6)
CONTTACT NUMBER / PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER Purchase order and/or contract numbel(s) of (5) above as well as purchase order number of equipment or material which is nonconforming.
If an NCR is written against Ebasco or Louisiana Power & Light, a
contract number is not applicable, but a purchase order number of the nonconforming equipment or material is still required.
(7)
DESCRIPTION OF COMPONENT, PART, OR SYSTEM Enter complete unique description / identification number of the component, part or system of the actual nonconforming ites. Examples:
" Containment Spray Penetrations No. 345 & 35B (Nozzles)"
"480V Breaker AK 06680"
" SUS 75 480V HCC Class IE BUS Bar Bolted Connections" s
~
ASP-III-7.1 Page 3 of 6 (8)
DRAWING NO./ SPEC NO.
Eater any or all of the following as applicable to the nonconforming candition and/or to the criteria / requirement not complied with:
drawing number, specification number, procedure / traveler / process centrol sheet number, standard / code / year / addenda, service form number, CFKA number, etc.
(9)
DE5CRIPTION The description must state the requirement being violated or not being complied with.
(Reference specification, procedure, code, etc., as applicable). The description of the nonconforming condition must specifically delineate the. parameters or attributes that render the item, component, part, system, and/or activity nonconforming. Support the description with sketches, photographs, drawings, etc. as applicable. If the nonconformance involves installed material, give location, elevation, etc.
(9-A)
REPORTABILITY STAMP Ehasco QA will af fix this stamp in red on each NCR. The QAE who reviews the NCR will evaluate the condition per the requirement of 10CFR 50.55(e) and 10CFR 21. This evaluation will be made prior to the NCR being transmitted for corrective action.
(10)
ATTACHMENTS If description refers to attachments, label each attachment and indicate number of pages in each attachment. Make sure attachments are the latest revision and are legible and reproducible. Attachments any include but are not limited to: Deficiency Reports Discrepancy Notices, Drawings / Sketches, CIWA's, Start-Up Service Forms, etc.
(11)
ITEM NUMBER The Ebasco QA Engit.eer who reviews the NCR will enter the number of items affected by this nonconforming condition for purposes of Ebasco Qt's Quarterly Trand Analysis.
If there are numerous trend codes favolved, an item number is required for each trend code.
If the item narber cannot be determined by reading the description, the Ebasco QA Engineer will contact the originator of the NCR to obtain this number.
(12)
SIGNATURES, TITLES AND DATES Name (printed or typed) and signature of originator of the NCR.
(13)
TITLE / COMPANY OF (12) ABOVE (14)
D&TE NCR DESCRIPTION IS WRITTEN 1
~
1 l
ASP-III-7.1 Page 4 of 6 (15)
REC 000 ENDED DISPOSITION The Sr. Resident Engineer, or designee, will provide a Recommended Disposition (RD). The RD shall consist of a specific resolution to correct the nonconforming condition, including program changes
)
necessary (i.e., revisions to specifications, procedures.. retraining of personnel, etc.).
A RD must also classify problem resolution as one of the following: " accept", " reject", " repair", " rework", or
" scrap".
(16)
IF RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION REFERS TO ATTACHMENTS, SEE (10) ABOVE (17)
CONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR INSPECTOR Name (printed or typed) and signature of individual providing the Recommended Disposition.
Should include the signature of the respective contractor's Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI) when applicable by procedure and Code mandate.
(18)
TITLE / COMPANY OF (17) ABOVE (19)
DATE RECC}0 ENDED DISPOSITION IS WRITTEN (20)
EVALUATION OF DISPOSITION Evaluation of Disposition (ED) will either " accept", " reject", or
" accept (the Recommended Disposition) with comments". More than one individual may provide an Evaluation of Disposition.
Each separate evaluation will be clearly labeled as to who wrote it.
The Engineering Evaluation of Disposition will provide calculations as applicable to support and document compliance to applicable codes and standards or make reference to the appropriate analysis reports.
(21)
ATTACHMENTS AND MULTIPLE EVALUATIONS OF DISPOSITION If the Evaluation of Disposition refers to attachments, see (10) above.
If more than one ED is to be provided, or if an evaluation is to be revised, and there is not enough room in this space to write legibly, this additional information will be provided as attachments to the NCR and noted as such on the face of the NCR form. Such attachments will include the name (printed or typed), signature, and title of the writer as well as the date.
(22), (23), (24), (25) CHECKING BOXES The Ebasco QA Engineer will check, initial, and date the box (es) indicating which Ebasco Department (s) will provide the Evaluation of Disposition.
ASP-III-7.1 Page 5 of 6 ESSE EVALUATION OF DISPOSITION (22-A)
Name (printed or typed) and signature of the Ebasco Site Support Engineering (ESSE) Engineer or Ebasco New York Engineer who writes an Evaluation of Disposition in Item (20). An authorized signature list is to be available in each department for reference.
(22-B)
Include date and check one of the three blocks indicating " accepted",
"raj ected", or " accepted with comments".
Checking these boxes shows your decisions about the evaluation of disposition, indicating " Accept" means you agree with the " Evaluation of disposition", indicating reject means you do not agree with the evaluations of disposition. If you wish to add or delete something from E.D. do so initial /date and mark " accept with comment".
EBASCO QA EVALUATION OF DISPOSITION (23-A)
Name (printed or typed) and signature of Ebasco QA Engineer who writes an Evaluation of Disposition in Item (20).
In addition, the Ebasco QA Engineer's Evaluation of Disposition may impose specific requirements in order to verify corrective action taken to correct the nonconforming condition. For this purpose, he may use Form 6009-11/2-82-A (attached) entitled " Evaluation of Disposition - Ebasco Quality Assurance". Whether or not the Ebasco QA Engineer writes an evaluation of disposition, he will always sign this block and complete 23-B.
(23-B)
See (22-5) above.
EBASCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF DISPOSITION (24-A)
Name (printed or typed) and signature of Ebasco Construction Engineer who writes an Evaluation of Disposition in Item (20).
(24-B)
See (22-B)'above.
l EVALUATION OF DISPOSITION BY OTHERS (25-A)
Name (printed or typed) and signature of other Ebasco QA designees (including Ebasco's Authorized Nuclear Inspector when applicable) who I
write an Evaluation of Disposition in Item (20). If the Ebasco ANI is involved in the NCR review, his should be the last ED provided in order that he may review the total NCR prior to corrective action being taken.
(25-B)
See (22-B) above.
~
ASP-III-7.1 Page 6 of 6 (26)
CORRECTIVR ACTION - REQUIRED OR NOT REQUIRED The Ebasco QA Engineer will check, initial, and date the box indicating whether corrective action is " required" or "not required".
}
If corrective action is "not required", the QA Engineer's check mark, initial, and date will indicate closure of the NCR.
If corrective action is " required", the Ibasco QA Engineer will check, inipial and date this box.
If corrective action is " required", a copy of the NCR and attachments will be transmitted by Ebasco QA to the appropriate party (ies) for corrective action. The original NCR form andl attachments will be retained in the Ebasco QA Files.
(27)
COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT Upon completion of corrective action, the party correcting the nonconforming condition will indicate the Corrective Action performed and will sign and date in space 27.
S (28)
VERTFICATION OF DISPOSITION The Ebasco QA Engineer will check, initial and date the box indicating whether Verification of Disposition is " Required" or "Not Required" prior to issuing the NCR for corrective action.
If Verification is " Required", the QA Engineer will verify that corrective action has been completed in accordance with the NCR Reconnendation and Evaluation of Disposition. Whether a physical check of hardware needs to be made to verify corrective action is up to the discretion of the Ebasco QA Engineer and/or his supervisor.
If Verification is "Not Rpquired", the QA Engineer will check, initial i
and date the "Not Required" box, thereby closing the NCR.
j (29)
CLOSURE OF THE NCR BY EBASCO QA When the Ebasco QA Engineer completes Item (29) on the original NCR form, the NCR has been closed.
i j
l
(
i 1
-.~,. _ _,.. _ _.
I a}qIt
,.b S
T gi ll E4 M
- L 0 3M ThL 3
B/T Co M
S T
tsAuE CT Tf s
T oI 4!
C
~
Ct P P N qo l
Aou PE cGCo O3C 3
4q C MC
/ n a
o ST y'.
MIII s,N v
c,*
1 3g
.)e e,
.gs
(
o 7, Moyu S
fMo S
S S r agY NsmT s
G 0,
G u r
Tk l o
t
. 3 M
A 4'
(w C
y (C t g
g pe
- R p
fr 4r4ygs
/s c y
, F dAo OJ g
s
, C rw
/
q r
,O C
J es de
~
=
~
~
+
M l
E a
0 K)
A S
WD T*
Na n
u r
0 3' E m u
o Mi l
l d*s A
g o*s V
v
/om s
E s
v l
t e
E C 3 c
gv MAa s
3 o
S E
cco q
eP La.a s
s rs Co 3 '
1 r
E M cqc g'
C E
qt U
T or G3 S I
Y ca SNS EG u
D1 P 3U w
/. 3 -
cATq s
'm A
4 T
3 E*
H S
L C
8*
T
=
4o I
TCc32 CrE1 4e 4 4s0<
1 q O
04 s
5 okI I
v e cue M eC 4
r T iO L S
u g s o CrR L
M AwPA
- D c u oo 7
['#E
" C" # o 3
g s ow 3
AS'C l
e T
qv H}l i
i cS g
gV g
yK o
gA Mm 4c
,L er g S gP g 'N gn gC
,ou jf g, 4 'z 3* di,-
y C i
yN C
un C
og g2' D so i
y s<
~
1