ML20117F378
| ML20117F378 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 06/20/1983 |
| From: | MERCURY CO. OF NORWOOD, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20117F125 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-205 PROC-830620, NUDOCS 8505130218 | |
| Download: ML20117F378 (20) | |
Text
, fi, af
(
1], [ / 5.' I-i
<g'I-I PROCEDURE s
FOR HANDLING OF NONCONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION WATERFORD S.E.S. UNIT #3 CONTRACT NO. W3-NY-15 PREPARED BY:
m
/O'23-79 R&.f6cr b>nixhre Signature
,Dete Title APPROVED BY:
h
/0-Z 3'- 78
@fj Q wy;gy g
Si e
Date
'ficia 4
N ' U~l b
'QGT@Q Wg%
s ture Date Title enwn neutert Si nature Date
. Tit le 5
QUAIM ASSURANCE ENGINEERINC y _,.-
D "*"** "* 8""c"e'n"=*am*es menes; = me===
amen emiasmessesme 8505130218 841105 e
hRNA
-205 PDR U N "*'** *'*
- NOTE:
V ERCL RY' CD EME CO \\ Tad _ _Ej E5@$@
~
DOCUV
\\T
==#
i Yy. 28PF/d-DME 9/E/## -
Luu m sw ruwrK a LIGHT COMPANY II D MAT WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983 - 1165 MW INSTALLATION -UNIT #3 ERASCO SERVICES, INC. REF. W3-NY-15 4
6/20/8 LY M/
CONFORMANCES.AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
,fk[M4 3
5/10/8:
2 3/8/s3f pjj
, MERCURY COMPANY /4 5
I'-
D/27/82 M M
g d'
cynooncoa,sc O
D-D-78 suemoww or mene ca a mooaa.=cosweaaw g
REV DATE CHKD' APPVD REV DATE CHKD APPVD N49720-SP664 Sheet 1 of 10 80P4 BF w.,.e.
r O
S o
LIST OF REVISIONS
,Rev.
Description 0
First Issue.
1 Added Para. 4.2.1, Rev. Para. 6,0, 6.3.3, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 9.3, 9.5, 5.1.1, 4.7 PROJECT MANAGER APPR0"AL M
INITIALS DATt
/
PROJECT ENGINEER APPROVAL M"MM f//p/gy,
~
INITIALS D1TE '
t QA SUPERVISOR APPROVAL 29 dp 82 INITIALS DATE Rev.
Description 2
Added Para. 2.0, Rev.10.4, Revised Exhibit 7 Revised para. 7.4 PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL M
,F-Co-83 INITIALS DATE 3//eJ(($,
PROJECT ENGINEER APPROVAL INIIIAES DATE QA SUPERVISOR APPROVAL MM g-f-fJ INITIALS DATE LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 198'3-1165MW Installation - Unit #3 EBASCO SERVICES INC. Ref. W3-NY-15 3
5/10/83
[M PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OP NON-2 3/8/83M
/gj fp y
MERCURY 1
9/27/8; COMPANY Q 10-20-71lN bM 4
6/20/83 "N/
WNE REV DATE CHED AFFVD REV DATE CHKD AFFVD N49720 - SP664 SH 1a of 10 penne ar/ esse
LIST OF REVISIONS (Cont'd)
Rev.
Description 3,
Revised 5.3.1 & 5.4 PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL M
[-//*[.3 INITIAL DATE PROJECT ENGINEER APPROVAL T4 6.It-T 3 INITIAL DATE QA SUPERVISOR APPROVAL MM-J" -// -87 INITIAL DATE Rev.
Description 4
Revised 4.2, 5.0, 5.1.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.E.3, 5.2, 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.4, 5.7, 6.2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.3.1, 7.3.2, Deleted 7.3.3, Revised 7.4, 9.0, 10.1, 10.3.
PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL M
d -E/-8 3 INITIAL DATE PROJECT ENGINEER APPROVAL A/
It INITIAL DATE QA SUPERVISOR APPROVAL MM 4 J/ /'J INITIAL DAT1 LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY _
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165MW Installation - Unit #3 EBASCO SERVICES, INC., Ref. W3-NY-15 PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTION ACTION 4
6/20/83p pg MERCURY COMPANY 3
5/10/8: Meh [/4 or Nomvooo,sc N49720 - SP664 Sheet Ib of 10 REV MM CHKD MPVD REV MTE CHKD MPVD conussrm os
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE
~
2.0 SCOPE 3.0 REFERENCE.
4.0 DEFINITIb51 S.0 NONCONFOR!bWCE PROCEDURE 6.0-6UALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW BOARD
~
7.0 DISPOSITION
_' ~
8.0 REINSPECTION 9.0 NONCONFORMING' TAG MAINTENANC
~
10.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION,
11.0 RECORDS
'~
~
~
12.0 AUTHORI E 1[UCIEAR INSPECTOR AUD CUSTOMER INSPECTOR 13.0 EXHIBITS LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165MW Installation - Unit #3 EBASCO SERVICES INC. Ref. W3-NY-15 3
5/10/83 k Mg PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF 10N-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 1
9/27/82 6 COMPANY 0
10-20-7B 8C LST 4' 6/20/83 M7/g OF NORWOOD,1NC REV DATE CHKD AFFVD REV DATE CHKD AFFVD N49720 - SP664 SH 2 of 10 posessw. asses
- 1. 0 ' PURPOSE: Control of Nonconforming materials, itema cnd carvices end tha nsc-a esscry diap cition cnd/or corrsctiva cetion requirsd to resolve thass noncon-form *.nces idcntifisd during tha parformance of racsiving, inprocess, end finci inspection or audits shall be accomplished in accordance with this procedure
.... and. as required in accordance with.ASME.III..
2.Q SCOPE:.._This procedure.provides for.the control of Nonconformine materials;~
items and services. significant to safety and in accordance with ASME III.-..
)
310 ; REFERENCE
~~ ~~~
3;.1 ASME'itI - Nucl~eEr Power Plant Components 32 ANSI N45.2 - QA Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities 3.3 Ebasco Contract Documents - W3'-NY-15 3.4 Mercury Quality Assurance Manual 3
3.5 10CFR50, Appz. B
4.0 DETINITIONS
~
4.1 Nonconformance - A condition'in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the quality of an item or service unaccept-able or indeterminate. Examples of nonconformances include:
Physical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documentation, or deviation from prescribed inspection or test procedures.
t The following are some namples of deviations from the applicable
! specifications, codes and standards that must be classified as nonconformances.
A. Deviations that affect the structural integrity of the item such i
as deviation in materials; deviation in nondestructive testing
}
requirements; deviations in welding, heat treating / stress relieving requirements; deviations from parameters of stress reports; devia-(
tions in testing requirements and undersized steel reinforcing bars.
B. Deviations that are likely to result in failure or reduce materially the usability of the item, such as deterioration resulting from in-adequate storage; use of welding filler metal other than those j
specified by the specification; surface irregularities exceeding code requirements; severe localized corrosions and pipe bending radius smaller than that specified by the specification.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGliT COMPANY WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-ll65HW Installation - Unit #3 EBASCO SERVICES INC. Ref. W3-NY-15 3
5/10/83 M4f.
PROCEDURE FOR HINDLING OF NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 2
3/8/83 M4.-
(
. MERCURY 1
9/27/S; g
COMPANY
~
0 10-20-7 5b
(. M 4
5/20/83 M d6/[
OF NORwCOO INC
~
u REF DATE CHKD AFFVD REV DAIE CHKD AFFVD N49720 - SP664 SH 3 of 10 nunsasMene
.m.
--,,,nn
~
. - (Cont'd.):
4.0 Items discovered to be out of tolerance of specification at routine check points of an inspection process shall not be considered as a nonconformance provided:
A. The condition is corrected prior to acceptance of the work in i
accordance with previously approved procedures.
\\k B. The work does not proceed beyond the check point until the correction is made.
C. The condition does not affect work previously accepted.
/.
~
.( D.NoviolationofProcedureorCodeisevident.]
1
~ ~ - -
4.2 Nonconforming Report - A report prepared by anyone within the Marcury Organization which identifies and controls a nonconformance (EIHIBIT #1, #2).
4.3 Disposition - Those actions required to resolve a nonconformance.
4.4 Nonconforming Tag - Yell 0W HOLD TAG, ORANCE CONDITIONAL RELEASE TAG, or RED REJECT TAG which is attached to the nonconforming item to identify its nonconforming status.
~
4 5.0'? NONCONFORMANCE PROCEDURE: The reporting of nonconformances shall not be
" limited to the QA/QC Department. Whenever a suspected nonconformance is discovered, it shall be the responsibility of the individual or department to initiate a nonconforming report.
When suspected non-conforming material, items, and services are determined by the QA Supervisor or his designee to be nonconforming, a nonconformance number shall be taken from the Nonconformance Log (EXHIBIT #3) and shall be indicated on the non-conforming report. All actions relating to the nonconformanc.e shall refer to the assigned nonconformance number.
5.1 Nonconformance Categories:
5.13 Material Receiving Inspection: Receiving Inspection noncon-formances shall be documented on the Receiving Inspection Report (EXHIBIT #1) by indicating the nonconformance, recommen-dad disposition, disposition review, nonconformance number, and disposition verification. EXHIBIT #1 shall be distributed to the Project Manager, QA Supervisor and Field Superintendent.
5.1.1.1 Materials received from the customer on a.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 19ES-ll65MW Installation - Unit #3 EBASCO SERVICES.INC. Ref. W3-NY-15 3
5/10/83 jM PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF NON-2 3/8/83 M d4 1
9/27/82 cy y
MERCURY COMPANY 0
10-20-18& Q7 4
6/20/83 _g/g OF NOmv000,#C REV DATE CHKD AFFVD REV DATE CHKD AFFVD N49720 - SP664 SH 4 of' 10 poseasresas
5,0 (Cont'd) canditional ccccpt status shall b3 notcd as a n:nconfo ming item cnd tha recsen for ths non-conformance on EXHIBIT #1.
The customer's
" conditional release" form shall be attached tc the receiving inspection report. The material shall be placed on hold or conditionally re-1 eased as required by construction schedule and as deemed necessary by the Project Manager and QA Supervisor. The customer's conditional accept tag shall not be removed until such time as the status change has been identified by the customer.
5.1.2 Inprocess & Final Inspection: Inprocess and final inspection non-conformances shall be documented on the QC Nonconformance Report (EXHIBIT #2). EXHIBIT #2 shall be routed to the Project Manager and the QA Supervisor for dispositioning.
5.1.3 When customer approval of nonconformance is required, the QA Supervisor shall transfer the applicable nonconformance report in-formation onto Ebasco QA Nonconformance Report form 6009-11 (EXHIBIT #8), and forward this report to the customer QA Site Supervisor for review and evaluation of the recommended disposition prior to further processing.
5.2 Inspection and Segragation: Quality Control shall prepara and attach to-the nonconforming item a YELLW HOLD TAG (EXHIBIT #4). When physically possible, the nonconforming item shall be transported to a " Nonconforming Material Control Area."
5.2.1 When it is not possible to hang or place a HOLD TAG, s'ch as in a u
procedural noncompliance or an NCR written as a generic type, the QA Supervisor shall enter "NA" in the space provided on Exhibit 2.
5.3 Recommended Disposition: After receiving the nonconforming report (EXHIBIT
- 1 or #2), the Project Manager shall indicate his recommended disposition on the report. The disposition of the nonconforming material or items may i
ne as follows:
5.3.1 Use as is: A disposition which may be imposed for a nonconformance when it can be established that the discrepancy will result in no adverse condition and that the item under consideration will con-tinue to meet ASME Code, Design Specification, and all Engineering functional requirements including performance, maintainability, fit, and safety. The QA Supervisor will transfer the applicable noncon-formance report information onto Ebasco QA Nonconformance Report, form 6009-11(EXHIBIT #8) and forward this report to the customer QA Site Supervisor for review a2d evalustion of the recommended dis-position prior to further LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY a
processing.
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165MW INSTALLATION - UNIT #3 EBASCO SERVICES,.INC., Ref. W3-NY-15 PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MERCURY COMPANY 4
6/20/83 M'N4 Om0Rwo00.NC REY DATE CHED AFFVD REV DATE CHED APFVD N49720-SP664 SH 5 of 10
" " 3 " "'
Ss0 (Cont'd) 5.3.2 R':pnir or R work: If tha rsecamindsd dicpneition indicates rapsir or rework, th3 Projset Mancgsr shall b3 responsible to prepare the necessary drawings and repair procedures and submit to the QA Supervisor for review and acceptance. When the disposition violates the specific requirements of the Design Specification, the QA Supervisor shall transfer the applicable nonconformance report information onto Ebasco QA Nonconformance Report. form 6009-11 (EXHIBIT #8), and forward this report to the customer QA Site Super-visor for review and evaluation of the recommended disposition prior to further processing.
If the disposition is accepted by QA, the applicable Process Control Trave 2er shall be revised by QA,-
when required to control the disposition of the nonconformance, by including the appropriate construction and inspection operations into a revised Process Control Traveler addendum which shall be printed on colored paper. The amended Process Centrol Traveler shall reference the nonconformance number and shall be attached by HQC to the original Process Control Traveler, located in the Field Job Folder. When required, all repair procedures and drawings relating to repair or rework shall be presented to the ANI for review, acceptance, and assignment of Hold Points on the Process Control Traveler addendum.
5.3.3 Rej ect: Rejected items shall be scrapped or returned to the customer.
,r 5.3.4 Conditional Release: When required and justified by construction schedule, material or items on hold may be released for fabricat-ion, installation, or test on a conditional basis. The Project Manager shall determine if a Conditional Release is justified based upon the project schedule, the seriousness of the material or item nonconformance and the desired operation (s) to be performed on the
- material or item. The Project Manager shall indicate in the recom-mended disposition portion of the Receiving Inspection Report (EXHIBIT #1) or the Non onformance Report (EIRIBIT #2) that the material or item is to be conditionally released and the extent of operations to be performed on the material or item. The QA Su'pervisor shall be responsible for evaluating the Conditional Release disposition and determining whether the nonconforming con-dicion(s) can be corrected or resolved af ter the desired operations have been completed. The recommended Conditional Release disposit-ion (EXHIBIT #1 or EIHIBIT #2) shall be accepted by the QA Supervisor prior to implementation.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165MW ' INSTALLATION-UNIT #3 EBASCO SERVICES, INC., Ref. W3-NY-15 PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF
{
NONCONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MERCURY COMPANY 4
6/20/83
,,26/g OF NOmWOOO.sc REV DATE CHKD AFFVD REV DATE CHKD AFFVD N49720-SP664 SH 6 of 10 roamanaens 1
m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _...... _
540 (Cont'd) 5.4 R:comm:ndcd Dicposition Acespttd by ths QA Supsrvisor: Upon rsesipt of QA Supervisor's acceptance, the QA Supervisor shall present all nonconforming reports affecting ASME P2 related activities to the ANI for his review and concurrence prior to initiating the activity.
5.5 All nonconforming reports shall be reviewed by the QA Supervisor in accord-ance with 10CFR21.
5.6 Recosamended Disposition Not Accepted by the QA Supervisor: Should the QA Supervisor disagree with th:a. Project Manager's recommended disposition, it shall be presented to the QA Review Board for resolution.
h 5.7 A copy of all Nonconformance Reports (EXHIBIT #2) shall be distr 18uted and original placed in Q.A. file after MQA review of the recommended disposition.
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW BOARD:
6.1 QA Review Board shall be responsible for resolving the QA Supervisor's rejection of the disposition indicated on the nonconforming report. QA Review Board membership shall consist of the following individuals.
.1 Vice-President
.2 Quality Assurance Manager 4-
.3 Quality Assurance Superviso,r
.4 Project Manager 6.2 Board members may call upon other individuals or departments to act in an advisory capacity, however, the decision for acceptance shall be made by board members and must be unanimous and meet all requirements of the ASME Code when applicable. The Project Manager shall revise the disposition to incorporate the unanimous decision of the QA Review Board and forward to the QA Supervisor for acceptance.
7.0' DISPOSITION: All Hold Tags attached to the nonconforming material or item shal'1 be conspicuously displayed to ensure that no operations are performed beyond those~ authorized'by the approved disposition. EQC shall initiate clearance of the nonconformaning item as follows:
7.1-Use as is: It "use as is" is dispositioned, the TELLOW HOLD TAG shall be removed by MQC and forwarded to QA for filing.
Construction shall proceed with fabrication.
7.2 Repair or rework: If " repair or rework" is dispositioned (Ref. 5.3.2),
construction shall comply with the requirements of the approved disposition.
When identifying the item during repair or rework, the YELLOW HOLD TAG shall be marked rework by Quality Control.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165mw INSTALLATION - UNIT #3 EBASCO SERVICES,,INC. Ref. W3-NY-15 PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF NON-CONIORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTICH MERCURY COMPANY 4
5/20/83 p gg op ex REV DATE CHKD AFFVD REV DATE CHKD AFFVD N-47920 - SP664 SH. 7 of 10 w--
,--,,.--,-----,,,,,gc
-,.---,,---,,--,a.
~
n
7.3 Rejcet
If "rsjcet" is diepsoitiened (Rsf. 5.3.3), MQC chall rapicca
]4 the YELLOW HOLD TAG with a RED REJECT TAG (EXHIBIT #5) and shall indicate i
j compliance with the disposition of indicating on the RED REJECT TAG as follows:
.1 Reject - Scrap 1
Items dispositioned as scrap will be physically destroyed / deformed in the presence of HQC and discarded in the appropr'iate containers.
MQC shall complete the applicable portion of the RED REJECT TAG and forward to QA for filing.
.2 Reject - Return to Customer.
A On items rejected and returned to the customer, MQC shall be notified
/4\\
and shall assure the NCR number is referenced on the Return to Ware-house form. The RED REJECT TAG will accompany the item to the Ebasco warehouse and a copy of the Mercury NCR attached to the Return to Warehouse form. The TELLOW HOLD TAG shall be forwarded to QA for A
filing.
/4\\
.3 DELETED.
I 7.4 Conditional Release: If " conditional release" is dispositioned (Raf.5.3.4)
MQC shall replace the customer's conditional accept tag with a Mercury ORANGE CONDITIONAL RELEASE TAG (EXHIBIT #6). The ORANGE CONDITIONAL RE-LEASE TAG shall indicate the extent of operations permitted by the conditional release. HQC shall be respon'sible to discuss with the Field Superintendent or his designee the extent of construction operations authorized by the conditional release. HQC shall attach with the, Mercury Yellow Hold Tag, an Orange Conditional Release Tag.
8.0 REINSPECTION
Upon completion of the activities required to correct the non-conformity, it shall be the responsibility of the Field Superintendent to notify MQC that the work has been completed and is ready for reinspection. When required, QA shall be responsible for coordinating the reinspection with the ANI and/or Customer Inspector. After acceptance by MQC and the ANI, the non-conforming tags shall be removed by MQC and forwarded to QA for filing and the items shall be placed back into the construction sequence.
8.1 If verification of disposition is expected to exceed twenty (20) working days from the time that Mercury receives the evaluated disposition from the customer, a request,for extensi5n must be transmitted to the customer's QA Site Supervisor stating the reason for the request and the extension time needed. The customer's QA Site Supervisor will respond to the request.
9.0 HOLD TAG MAINTENENCE: The Field Superintendent or his designee shall be responsible to maintain in place all Hold Tags attached to an item. Hold Tags shall be replaced or removed from the nonconforming item by MQC only. When removed,.all Hold Tags shall be forwarded to QA for attachment to the original nonconformance report. The customer's QC Inspector will obtain the Ebasco conditio,nal release tags from Mercury upon c lation of disposition.
DISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANT 1
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165mw INSTALLATION - UNIT #3 EBASCO SERVICES, INC., Ref. W3-NY-15 PROCEDURE FOR EANDLING OF UON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MERCURY COMPANY 4
6/20/8:
gh OFNORvCOOpC N-49720-SP664 SH 8 of 10 REV MTE AFFVD REV W
CHKD AFFVD roans arens
.. ~.
9.1 MQC shall document the verification of the completion of the recommended disposition on the original nonconformance report (EXHIBIT #1 or #2) and i
the Nonconformance Log (EXHIBIT #3) and redistribute the applicable non-conformance report.
9.1 In addition, when form 6009-11 (EXHIBIT #8) is used, verification of' com-pletion of the evaluated disposition will be documented on part IV and
- signed and dated on the pink copy of the report by the MQA Supervisor.
The pink copy of the report shall then be transmitted to the Ebasco Site QA Manager and the yellow copy shall be maintained with the original nonconformance report (EXHIBIT #1 or #2) with a copy of the pink copy.
10.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION:
10.1 When in the judgement of the Site QA/QC Manager a nonconformance requires immediate corrective action or a recurring condition exists,.he shall indicate a request for corrective action. Corrective action shall in-
)
clude:
1.
Determination of cause.
2.
Recommended course to prevent recurrence.
3.
Implementation.
4.
Follow-up to verify effectiveness.
10.2 Corrective Action shall be initiated by QA as a result of one of the following actions:
.1 Nonconforming reports indicating recommended corrective action to prevent recurrence.
.2 Review by QA of nonconformance records, when a specific process such as welding, machinery, tests, etc., identifies recurring deficiencies.
.3 Program deficiencies reported through internal or external (performed by others) auditing.
.4 Vendor performance records indicate receiving inspection nonconformances.
.5 Unacceptable vendor surveys or audits establishing the need for cor-rective action.
h
^
10.3 Corrective Action shall be documented by using the Corrective Action Raquest (EXHIBIT #7).
10.4 Af ter receiving the corrective action form, the affected department manager or supervisor shall respond within fifteen (15) working dap concerning planned corrective action and corrective action completion date.
10.5 The QA Manager or his designee shall verify that the action is effective and complete sign-off and'date on EXHIBIT #7.
10.6 Copies of all corrective action requests shall be forwarded to the Vice l
President for field projects for evaluation..
11.0 RECORDS: All records generated under this section shall be maintained by QA.
. All raccTds shall be filed in the applicable QA Job File.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165mw INSTALLATION - UNIT #3 EBASCO SERVICES. INC.. Ref. W3-NY-15 PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF NONCON-FORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MERCURY COMPANY 4
6/20/8 lh MMd N N 8C REV DATE CMKD AFFVD REV DATE CHKD AFFVD N-49720-SP-664 SH. 9 of 10
' 12.0 AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR _ INSPECTOR AND CUSTOMER INSPECTOR: All rscorda ganareted and maintein d und:r this esction chall be made available to the ANI and Customer Inspector upon request.
13.0 EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT i FORM #
TITLE I
183 Receiving Inspection Report 2
196 QC Nonconformance Report 3
258 Nonconformance Log 4
194 Hold Tag 5
195 Reject Tag 6
268 Conditional Release Tag 7
256 Corrective Action Request 8
6009/11 Ebasco Nonconformance Report i
(
{
LOUIiiIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY l
WATERFORD CTEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1983-1165mw INSTALLATION - UNIT #3 EBASCO SERVICES, INC., Raf. W3-NY-15 PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING OF NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION MERCURY COMPANY 4
6/20/83 g g
op eg R49720-3P-664 SH. 10 of 10 REV MTE N
MFVD W
DATE CHKD AFFYD mm astmas
~~~
MERCURY m =. N-1L'1. O I r.e.
. L 2.3 5 o
.m_s/ar/fy
. COMPANY.
- ttre ca.r.s6
_g;gp q,
4
- M_**.
ucam.a twsrscrios most i.
g.
.. - ( g
.,,-.. - 0 0 9 c i... O.....
....,_ e. p.
im.
,m,..,
o.
..... v l :l:
l - 2,0 0 0*. FS ft.F FL.d - NT. Cobit A A-
. h *2. I-xooo* FS LA Es L AT. X 2. Us-n 3.
Tusp.cete. CustELI tt_
E WB 5/4 mEMaass U itfr.by F.S. i..a t,
rth, m le q.te )
e.,
3 O
O c
3.w.
O E
O
%1,, L E 4 Tao. cal c',s c
u ass O
O S
.in m
m.L1m Joao* c.s.
c cr O
E O
,=,.s t a.-
O O
E F-.-,
f c.
.u E
O O
E
~
~
E RTnT1 TIT 1 3-=
- n O
O 3
s,= s.: s s '
O O 2 E
O O
O
(
(
j
.crte=. O aas i rm,.s.iar c.=t tne O e.e. s
.. 62.
isie m.
3.
mu-
- u. =, - M 2-LL L.-
som
., r ish
,i m _
W m ih~l6...
4 Sr
.u m
3,,,,_.
A.too os r.s. 1 A A.
0
.-, NU1 \\\\ A s
o i.
O s se.e n.= t b
o w.oA.
%-Nib"
@h *D C o w A-- - -
m..
o>
w,.W-
.2oi
- h. i/b das
/
h O
== <-4:u - > a i.
2
,4
.. a...
Y iscs
///I/W
$ sua n.3.= T.e,a-If,o8f'
. n a s
,as m
na
/ /
D. o L *.6 + n -uaren - D 1 m,,, it,,/w
,. --.u, m
w 6
6
//
L t s ra..-
,1,dd
,k
- . g
. :, -n.: n u
G=
O= 1IL~
ltb1
,..., s/4 k.
.,.a.
t.
/,/
J s
/
/
//
aw
. __,tpr. 101 (11781
MERCURY j
COMPANY oc.mannen,.a u,one
.ma m. N -/ M. a/
.--.o,.c= con c u..t.,,a
..a
- -.,,... w uns 1/4/74
.. - su u,
a...
.u...
- m. ara n.,
.... a..
i,, i.. - u e,.
,i,a
--r.
1*A M $5) A AD'- msh ),
fhnyhb's J~@
w It 2~ MM 0 l A dJ/* 6, w /),***.2.. _f,, lasm Alb>$1d>
w m d w ]>
/>'Y b sunefw*jj & nda h h E) fA 8]D$.
2.
ta=,i-w -====
mum=== ras ogAm.u
= x
,,,,,,,,, Q h
,,,,/,j, e t 3 : n
,\\d _ h.A 0 e u) n.
- 3. IIe hA 4.
- - sas,esstras r
0 O== = u D a.,.a a m s him '>1 Y U j 'nea_ m 2 A m s, p> W M. L Mf $ r n
/
o,
O 3.- -
Twr= d euu a i--r
&15"=.+ =x M-
== =vt=
w.*
a.
,. % A A w w s/xJu A s,
,,, z/,,se O = us s,
u.- ~ u
,_a 1.
- m. mum,+ w a no k h>n n a w. m as, M m>As Al "Amn wrJ) Aes ejof M m.
- M
\\'A.
'd \\V) \\\\ > M
.e,
%% %0
,N On.a 3luJva 3o-e o tc-
,ttLa
- sno, isle
'-=="a==*=='
.u.
cr 01.
S.
=,
4B18 8.
TIMDR BS,1QENCT IIOT13 (19.) ISSWBs an 'e l
a" f
ur.s 1.e.eurt.
v w
w-a Y2. AJAu 2/.a1/rd O
d S
l l%
la.
e.n.sJas
~.
rrnTRI.T 2
-(.
t e 194 (1/788 m_
m y
- -, - +., -, +.
MERCURY COMPANY g
NONCONFDRMANCE IDC A Subsidiary of Sg i
oF l
' Fischbach and Moore. Inc.
MON-DATE JOB RPT P.O. f DATE VDN D
s-CONF.
ISSUED ORDEE FORM AND DESCRIPTION OF DISPOS. OE
.i ITEM #
'(if ano)
-REC.ACC.
ISSUE
$1 lb^~f*E b=!^!'. k Ydf72 NO ghhh gtz1.DI pr.t 8
s
/.o #7. rue dar e M. w y,f,, 4 quin. am.n e a
q.w,,s ya nz a s.
a.
q s.. ma 4
4br sin a a a,*z r...a s. a i...m-.-
,Mr% Mu
- a
- i. o.-
- i.. m -
' 's?Mm 4
% +),, % *!
4 4,lu A
mn,. sa e
e C
EIRIBIT 3 A'
d A 9-M
^
AD*
-%V 1
~
4 Form 258 (1/78)
l Tom 194 (1/78)
O n=reur7 Co.
of Norwood, Inc.
's.'
A Subsidiary of Fischbach & noore, Inc.
THIS TAG IS TO BE RENOVED BT M C ONLT.
.H OLD Hold Tag No. H - 1862.
This ites is placed on temporary BOLD and is not to be further processed until authorized by MC.
E Marcury Purchased O Custa.or ruraished Job f M-12.'1.C1 P.O. # 6 2 5 71 Ites Ident. h4 1 5
A oo o* AF $1-- -*-
y Placed ca BOI3 by W b. Date Orb l
Reason for BOLD: W,,1 J Joaod EM -;.
I
_Noof Q
P! o. s.
.., n y\\
s h
CL 61 Q dA "
noNcoNroRuaNCr.no. 2oi DISPOSITION:
O E - release hold, use as is
. S 100ECT Tag No. R-II,0f O CONDITIONAL RELEASE No. C-O DISPOSITION AUTHORIZED BY:
h.[f//w MC I i 7/
DATE
/
/
.c i
WHEN KELEASED PROM HOLD RETURN THIS TAG.
E2HIBIT 4 TO QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT.
REMOVED BY: k
. b u..a MC dtt 1Y DATE
\\
/
g ia e
em P
Form 195_ (1/78)
- v. of Norwood. Inc.
A Subsidiary, of Fischbach & Hoore, Inc.
=
~
REJEC T
~
~
Reject Tag No. R-11.or
~
This item has been REJECTED and is not to be used.
@ Mercury Purchased
~
O Custo==r rurnished Job No.
M-12't.01 P.O.f
&2371 Item Ident.
L:H I, 1.. E NONCDNFORNANCE NO.
@ BOLD Tag No. E-1 B t.2.
i O CONDITIONAL RELEASE Tag No. C-h t
DISPOSITION:
(
@ To be RETURNED to Vendor.
\\y O To be SCRAPPED.
O DISPOSITION AUTHORIZED BY:
N. L$bM Y O..
HQC 1 tr$'ti DATE
~
/
i6 e
REMOVE BEFORE SHIPPING OR SCRAPPING.
RETURN COMPLETED TAG 10 QA DEPARTHENT.
Date shipped or Scrapped t IX 7/
t i
.Nb Removed BT EZHIBIT 5 O
S.0.9 RM9 jj L
- R dnuck Carrier G
0
b' Form 268 (1/78)
Mercury Co.
p of Norwood Inc.
v A Subsidiary of Fischbach E. Moore, Inc.
IHIS TAG IS 'TO BE REMOVED BT 2qC ONLT.
C O N D IT I O.N A L RELEASE CONDITIONAL RELEASE TAG NO. C - jog This item has been CONDITIONAT1T RELEASED.
,by the Project Manager for continued processing as limited below.
E Narcury Purchased O customer Furnished T
.Tob No. M -12.'1, o'5 P.O.i
- f LE 13 2, 5 tem Ident. lis* O.b. f.r. 00%. (A b'..
S A - t o b - t*
{
NONCONFORMANCE NO.
2.
S. BOLD Tag No. R - 102, O RETECT Tag No. 1 -
1 DISPOSITI(M:
O mErAIm on REv0m n
k M>'
V E OBTAIN QUALITT VERIFICATION DOCUMENTATION
/
EZIENT OF OPERATIONS ALICWED:
. O Fabricate only, Do Not Install '
- NIT s
. S. Complete Work, Do Not Test or Ship
~
'Q
- -A DISPOSITIONpUIHORIZEDBTs
~
~
~
fc./,#A,/ O d,.
)qC.a./se[7p
~
4 DATE
/~
/ t']
~
vNEN CONDITION IS RESOLVED RETURN THIS TAG TO QUALITI ASSURANCE DEPARIMENT.
EEHOVED EY b
5 2dSYN DATE i
y (pH.mu rg) 8 e a 1
m V
4' e
. > n. w..
.n an - =.-w ~ -
l MERCURY cxmcrivz Acrim equzsr
- COMPANY I
OF NORWOOD,INC l
Issued To: (Person / Dept.)
Result of: f".
Issued by/Date:
NCR No.
Audit
'R. Bade, Engineering Insp./TestE
-B. Cooder 2/15/81 006 Subject /Re!erences 3rawing/ Procedure:
Rev.
Job No.
Indoctrination and Training
'Q.A. Manual 12/23/81 Deviation: (See instruction "A" below)
Contrary to Para. 16.2.1 of the Q.A. Manual the following employees have'not been indoctrinated and trained as required:
B. Droop - Designer C. Catz - Draftsman 7
3 EXHIBIT 7
\\
/
Originator: M.
dr; Date: ?/15/81 Cxrrective Action to be liiiplemented: (See instruction "B" below)
The above personnel have been indoctrinated and trained per the Q.A. Manual Section 16. In the future new hires will be indoctrinated and trained within M
two weeks of start date.
nii l
n.
Department Head: / A M,
Date: 2/21/810. A. Approved: A
> Date2/21/81 Sunusary:
(See instruction "C" below)
The above situation has been corrected as indicated by a subsequent review of the Indoctrination and Training records for this department.
C.A.R. Closed: S Remains Open: O 0"*litY ^'*"r*"ce:A huDate:3/21/s1 Instructions: A) Quality Assurance fills in top portion of form, forwa'rds original to the department where deficiency exists, keeping a copy for open file. B) The Department Head fills in the corrective action to be implemented, signs and returns the original to 1
Quality Assurance within 15 working days. C) Quality Assurance reviews corrective cction for necessary follow-up and fills in and signs the Susseary, places original in closed file, a a Final Distribution:
Q.A. File Form 256 (2/81)
V.P. Administration Other V.P. Engineering
eseIs,81/,tr?
tcasCs sanveces inesapoaATeo IN'em. PGAf w f,se OA f.,,,,,6,el Ou ALITY AssuaANC2
~
~
naponT ne.iie N*MCONFORMANCE REPGRT Ya"*=
Cro*a'mi.a =.m-.ad.a.
desposite.n s
~
Pina. fai#iew.( Mca INSTRUCTIONS: (5 6eek et ren=3 ca.esar on PaoJact 588 oa*=ime ao.esase no. ise sonei..an, coastnuction oc on coarnacrea inn e o. no. ise sesensprioa or coupeasar. *aar om systsu isi
-=
1.
DESCRIFil0N OF NONCONFORMANCE firenre involved, Specificeolen. Code er 5 tended to which items De Not Comply.
Sankalt Skerek if Applieeble) r 1
~
amanes ano sienarvas or pensoa namentine noncouronmanes iss vit 6a /c onspaa v oars ise
~
i l i, RECOMMENDED DISFOstilon "** 15eknit Shetsh if Applieeble)
~e maus ano sienavuas or esason ascommaswoins oispos. Tion n u vir us /c ompa n y oats stan l i t.
EVAI.U ATION OF DISPOSITION ET ERASCO, REASON FOR DISPOSITION nas i
I V. CORRECTIVE ACTION"*'
R*983'*d O " ' " a'i d 4
l V.8iss] ENGINEERING OUALITY ASSURANCE C CONSTRUCTION OTHER maass assematumst maass essessaTunsi Maass tsiewafumaa maus iseessaTunst
- 1
- a.
s4?E oaTE oats ca7s O aces *Tso O a*JacTso O aces
- Tao asJacTso acca, Tao asasetso O acesaTso O asJactro aCCsPTso WITM ConnesNTS ACCsPTso WITH CotnesNTS O ACCsPTse WITM CoastesNTS ACCsPTdo WITM COesh0ENTS
?
Y I-VERIFICATION OF DISFOstTION nsousato not nseusaso"*8 f
i I
4
"?' SV Sees ATu n "
TITLs OAT *
- "s'.U.T Titt " **
3,.
EKHIBIT 8 j
.,,.,~
s w
,