ML20117F334

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev F to Procedure ES-142, Nonconformance & Corrective Action
ML20117F334
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/30/1981
From: Judith Weaver, Young J
NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20117F125 List:
References
FOIA-84-205 ES-142, NUDOCS 8505130206
Download: ML20117F334 (14)


Text

,

T!?.iHK!G3

sy--?

NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY t

=

CU1MBERT BLv0 L MotARTHUR CRIVE WE51M.ONT, t:tw Jit$tY OL108 TWX 710 8971757 1609) th6 7000 COVER SHEET 1

i ATTACHMENTS X)CUMENT NUMBER: ES-142 ORIGINAL DATED:

7/31/78

1. Nonconformance RepIrt.

"ITLE:

Nonconformance and Corrective Ar.: ion

2. Hold Tag
3. Receiving Inspection Report UST0MER: Louisiana Power and Light
4. NCE Log
6. Corrective Action

_ Report:

'ROJECT. Waterford SEs UNIT: #3 CONTRACT: W3 Nr.13.

INCORPORATED QUALITY i

SPECIFlCATION: N/A ASSURANCE

. ENGINEERING SCOPE OF REVISION:

A.

Original Issue this Project.

'T Document is:

l B.

Revised to incorporate customer connents.

,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,c os.

l C.

Revised to incorporate Waterford Site g},,,,,,,,w n. c Addenda to the QA Manual

.i.o: ine..i. c-amami.

.a

  • m a,*a't " ** *** * ""*

D.

Revised to incorporate customer coamsents.

E.

Rewrite

.g F.

Revise Table of Contentis. " Revise para. 4.1.1, 4. 3. 1,A,.B. C. 4.3.2 A,C'

"*",7,,*M,U*[.M.w.."'5i I

4.4.2 B.C.D.

4.4.4.

Deleted page'

.14 of 14.

.:e

.in in NISCO ENGlNEERINo^

~,,.."'*.",,*,,""",,*...*u""*',~v CONTROLLED

.s.

23456 By Datr._ ll' W 3

^

SIGNA TURE DATE REV.

INIT. & DATE REV.

INIT. & DAT EV E TEg:e# g4

_f e c h a. % lb

\\

/

i

,RR- $E

wt

%h F

"*M

%/a k

uo r

JTHORIZN I

/

[/

SPECT10 l

gesarsty 8505130206 841105 PDR FOIA

. 9?y, j, :.. c.

.. BERNA.BE84-205 PDR

. ;.2,-g-.g^,

[ v ' w+~

~k~

- - ~ ?Y -. - - - -. - --

-~

e -

~

- -. -". ~~.-~... ~.

  • [/8S8Q E.S. No.

142

+

  • s PAGE l_.0F 13

[

F DATE p/25/81 REVISION ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS l

~

1.0 Scope 2.0, Applicability 3.0 DefinitionsandAbbkeviations 4.0 Procedure 4.1, Responsibilities 4.2. Identification of Discrepancies F

4.3 Reporting of ' Discrepancias 4.4 Disposition of Nonconformance

~

4.5. Verification of Disposition 4.6 Corrective Action..

y 5.0 References Artschments.

.s

.1.'

Nonconformance Report 2.

Hold Tag 3.

Receiving Inspection Report 4.

NCR Log 5.

Corrective Action Report F

l g

I 8'

a.

?

NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY e

= s,=_

e.;;,;.,.;... w.

. o.

-. - ~

.n k

E.S. No.

13

[

PAGE 2 _op 6/25/81 R EVISION P

DATE ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION f

1.0 Scope This procedure describes the measures for identifying, reporting, controlling, and dispositioning discrepancies identified by.NISCO. It also describes the measures for obtaining corrective action ~for significant conditions adverse to quality.to preclude recurrence.

1r y 2.0 Applicability Discrepant items discovered by NISCO shall be promptly identified 'to prevent their continued or inadvertant use.

3.0 Definitioni and Abbreviations

~

3.1, ANI - Authorized Nucigar Inspector 3.2 ANSI N45.2'-

Quality ' Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear

~

Power Plents.

i-

~

3.3 ASME Section III - American Society of Mechanical Engineer's Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components.

' 3.4 CAR - Corrective Action Report (Attachment #5) 3.5.Diser.epancies (Nonconformity) - A cond'ition in characteristic, documentstion or procedure which renders the quality of an item or service unacceptable or indeterminate.

Fv==ples of discrepancies include:

physical defects, test failures, incorriet or inadequate documentation, or deviation from prescribed inspection or test procedures.

3.6. Item - Any level of unit assembly, including structure, system, sybsystem, subassembly, component, part or material 1

3.7 NCR - Nonconformance Report (Attachment #1) used to report discrepancies.

3.8 Repair - The proc'ess by which a discrepant. characteristic is restored

.t.och condition such that the 4apability of an item to function reliably and safely is unimpaired, even,though that it'en still may not conform to the original requirement.

3.9 Rawork'- The process by which'a nonconforming item is made to, conform,,

to a prior specified requirement by completion, remachining, reassembl; Lng or other corrective means.

y a

e b

~

ge 2

e e

NUCLEAR INSTALLATION. SERVICES COMPANY

- Mi Y

.,.[.y j hk l,.;

y

~;., '.

p

=

-xy,

.' - YW

    • t
  • =

.g

_. 3.-- : ~ : -,;

^, ; _ ; _ 3 _ ;_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ -

rh E.S. No.

142 k

PAGE OF 6/25/8:

R EVISION F

DATE ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION 4.0 Procedure' I

4.1 Responsibilities 4.1.1 The Field QA/QC Manager through his QC Inspectors is responsible for identifying discrepancies, preparing NCR's'and verifying that the approved disposition is. implemented. He shall maintain a status log of NCRs, review applicable NCRs with the ANIand evalu-F ate NCRs for trends and when trends are identified issue a CAR.~

4.1.2 'The Lead Engineer is responsible for providing the recossended disposition for NCRs.

l 4.1.3 The Site Manager -is responsible for obtaining documentation.which is determined at receiving inspection to be either missing or in-correct.

  • l 4.1.4 The Customer-is* responsible for evaluating and dprovi$ng NCR disposition.
  • 4.1.5 All NISCO personnel will report any discrepant conditions to.the Field QA/QC Manager.

4.2 IdentificationLof discrepancies

.. 4.2,.1 Utiian a discrepancy iscdeteeted,J "pE"' Tag (Attachment #2).

r shall be attached to the item, in v.our (o clearly identify.its status. The following information shall be recorded on t.he tag:

s A.

Individual who attached tag:

B.

Date C.,

Identification / Description of an.ter;Lal/ component D.

Reason for " Hold" status-

~

~

E NCR number 4.2.2.?" Bold" tags may only be, removed by QA/QC personnel.

4.3 Reporting of Discrepancies 4.3.1 An'y nonco6Eormities detected at Re be'iv$.ng, Insp e c tion,

l will.be documented on the Receiving Inspection Report.'

(RIR) (Attachment. #3), tagged *with :a Nis co~. Bold Tag, "

l and placed in,a Hold area when. practical.

The RIR-l wi.11 be-forwarded to-the Site Manager.

e l

NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY

  • ;Il:Q,*5h c.,$iQ..f.s.5% QQ:.q1;556 q.=g.a(.

q.~,:,;g.;;L ;,;:;;. ; z;r,34,7.x,. 7,7 y 3;,3

t p -

'k N

E.S. No. - 102 k

PAGE-4 13

_OF i '

  • 6/25/83 REVISION F

DA,TE ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION A. Teopy "of The RIR"wh'i'ch document-*di'aicYepahTiaiif 'on l-' yi i

Cdttone't-futarshant-items shalt-ba"-f orwardtrd to thm Cus comet-by--ths-Site Manager with a request-foc Tes olution..

-]

B.

For NISC0' furnished material the Site Manager shall notify ~.

'actioti7de$he 'Edi'cissef~a,:

~

vendor of T idiqWe'sh~the reqEiref F-edEd for~ resoldtTb11-- j

~

C.

The Field QA/OC Manager or his designee shall up'on complation F

of the resolution, sign the RIR to sigdify 'acceytance.

g.- - -

=.I 4.3.2 Discrepancies discovered'during fabrication, ' installation and testing are documiented on NCRs (Attachment #1).

A..[Th'e','QA]QC Manager or Eis _ desi_snee shall,_assian th e,, _"I NCR.. number from a log he maintains.

The NCR Log T!

Fsrs~f's s6own si~ Attachment (4.

Tli G A/Q'd~MIdager

~ ~ '

1 Or'~1Ts'~dseigdee~sha'11' Wedo rd' the. IlCR~nuidia'r7 'a ' del ~'

scription'of the discrepancy and,the date,in the NCE Log'.

3.' The. following information sliall be recorded on the NCR and.

' verified by the Field QA/QC Nanager (Note-the numbers listed

~'

below correspond to the block numbers shown on the NCR fopa):

1.

Report Number 2.- Client or Project (Waterford #3) 3 Drsving No./ Spec. No., aind Safety Class.

4.

Supplier, Construction QC or Contractor (NISCO)-

5.

F.O. Number

    • '4*

6.

Description of' component, part or system P 7.

Description ^ of. discrepancy- ~

8.

Name and signature of person reporting the discrepancy 9.

Date

?........

C..The QA/QC Manager or his designes shall reviev

~'id'~ sign the 'NCR' p rio r 't'o 'it's i s's u e ".' ~ ~Th e Q A7 ~ ~ " ' " ~

F

~-

~

~

a

~

QC Manager"oF Es~ designee hall're" cord the Ndi number 55' t'hi

'%1d" tag' and the RIR or the Process Control Sheet, as ap

  • plicable.,.

, 4.4 _ Disposition of NCRs.

.. c 4.4.1 The Field QA/QC Manager shall forward the NCR to:the Lead Engin-eer for dispositioning.

4.4.2 The Lead Engineer shall provide one of the following recommiended dispositions for each NCR:

.7 AP Use-as-is

~

NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY 2.we 2s3 FJs

}{ ~%i.Z-@f. GC,~ hbk.Q!s:..%.,.?i,...jp

,.~,,g 3., r :: 3 x __ ;;;_g. ~ ;

,g.;. ;y,3_

-~

rs

.*

  • M,k O E.S. No.

142

[

PAGE OF 5

13 6/25/82 R EVISION F

DATE ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

{

~

~B. Scrap i

~

y C. Return to Vendor

~

.D.

Rawork i

, The Field QA/QC Manager must, review and approve dispositions on i

4.4.3 all NCRs prior to implementation.

4.4.4. If the recommended dis' position is "use-as-is" or " repair" the Fid1d QA/QC Manager shall review ASME related' nonconformancais with i

the ANI and obtain the ANI concurrence with the disposition prior to implementation. The ANI shall enter his initials and date F

and "ANI" in the space marked " Recommended Disposition" to indi-cate his review and concurrence vith the proposed resolution.

t 4.4.5' After the disposition has been determined. the IInd Engineer -

I shall record the following 'information on the NCR (Note-the start i

bars listed below correspond to the block' numbers shoian on the NCE form.):

10. Recommended disposition.

- 11. Name and signature of person recommending disposition.

~

4 NOTE: The Field QA/QC' Manager shall initial and date the signature block (11) to signify concurrence with t.he

~

l disposi. tion.

12. Date

~

d.4.;6 The Site Manager,sha11' transmit dispositioned'MCRs to'the Cus-i toner for evaluation and concurrence with the recommended dis-position. The Customer sha11' document his review and forward the yellow and pink copi,es back to NISCO.

(In those instances where NCRs are dispositioned and corrective action'is implemented and verified by organizations other ~than NISCO, the Field QA/QC Mana-ser shall verify inceeptance of the item / condition).

1

]

4.5 Verification of Disposition.

4.5.1 Upon notifigation o'f the approved disposition,.the Field QA/QC

~

Manager shall perform the fo11o61ag:.

~

=

1 V ' ~

A. ' Items which are dispositioned."use-as-is" shall be returned to the fabrication process. The QC Engineer sha11' remove the hold tag and sign off the NCE as described in paragraph 4.5.2.

i e

.q

. NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY m

5.wiU.A,9:;n 46 4

.a.

M.. ; r.,.... ;w. ;.....

c 0; W=:i..4 ~ Me y-d-.,, i i.

v.. :. _. _. _ _., _ - _,

l 2:

t

.. -.. ~. - - -

e n

k 142 E.S. No. -

b PAGE__6 _OF

~

13 6/25/81l ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION REVISION F

DAT.

B.

Rework / Repair operations shan be performed in accor' dance with a supplemental Process Control Sheet which is prepared by.the Lead Engineer and approved by the Field QA/QC Manager.

The Supplemental PCS shan be submitted to the Cusi;omer and the ANI, as applicable, for review and selection of hold points.. Rework / Repair operations shan be performed in ac-

.I cordance with this PCS.

C.

The_s,upplemental PCS,,shan be m&intaine d.in..the samt,,_,,.

'sanner_as.the bf giaal PCS..and shall-be..identi-fdad -

I by_.the_aumb = e a 7 the...owriginal-PCS--so11 owe d. by -a-dash s

and a meauenH =1

- -M

,, I,.i a.. P CE.2 nA-1 )._.T41s. P CS -

numb e_r._ah all..b e_ inc.1.uded. o n the original PCS.4yd ad-Jacent to thA_.NCX number-

',,_.q i..,.

.. m y

  • _ Field QA/QC pe rsonnel.sha.11 ve rify...tha t.." Scrap _".1.tjeps.

are. clearly _. identified and. placed in.a designatzd area.._..l.

or ren6ved_..

1

~

' E.

Field 457QC personnel shall verify that items which have been dispositioned " Return to Vendor" are returned. If material is customer furnished NISCO shan return the material to the customer who shall be responsible for further action. 'Ihe Hold Tag shan rs= min on the item until removal from site or NISCO's control.

4.5.2 Closing of the Nonconformance Report-After the disposition has been implemented,'the Field QA/QC A.

Manager sha n verify that required actions have been comple-ted, and sign and date the NCR. form closing the NCR.

~

~

B.

When completed, the NCR will include a detailed description of the discrepancy, the disposition, review and approval Sy the Customer, the, concurrence of the ANI, when applicable, and verification of. completion by Field QA/QC Manager. The re-po'rt win also identify Corrective Action Reports, when ap-plicable.

C.

It is the responsibility of the Field QA/QC Manager to file -

- the completed and signed Nonconformance Repor.t with the of-ficial records and enter the completion of the NCR and the data into the NCR Log (Attachenta #4).

8

.1

-[

4.6 Corrective Action 4.6.1 The Field QA/QC Manager shan review au CRs prior to initial * -

issue as described in paragraph 4.3.2.C.

If he determines that a significant condition adverse to quality exists, he shall initiate a Corrective Action Report. Conditions which require corrective action, shan include, but not be limited.co the following:

NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY erm 2es ans-e~y,.s 9..,,.[...n.n.n..;

~. 1

.... m:- ~: :. r...

.w. ~.

, w..

. a_..

,s ;... :..

.----.w..--.

....z...

j _ a.. _,....:.,__..--

g__.

o n

N E.S. No.

142 a--

~

PAGE 7

OF; 13 6/25/81 ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION REVISION F

DATE A.

Insufficient or lack of. written instruction / procedures.

~

B.

Continued failure to comply-with written instru'etions/'

procedures..

C.

Repetitive " human error type" nonconformances.

D.

A process out of control; for example, a welding process fe which repeatedly results in major defects.

E.

Repetitive conditions identified during trend analysis (4.1.1).

4.6.2 When correct'1ve action is deemed necessary, the Field QA/QC Mana-ger shan record the fonowing information on the Corrective Ac-tion Report (CAR) (Attachment. f5).( Note-the numbers listed' belovcor-respond to the block numbers shown on the CAR form.)

  • 1.

Plant and Unit' 2.

Project 3.

Reference to applicable NCR or Audit Report" 4.

Responsible Project Representative / Contractor

, 5.

Basis for Corrective Action (Established criteria) 6.

Deficiency 7.

Signature of the Field QA/QC Manager 8.

Date of CAR 9.

Date by which corrective action is required 4.6.3 The CAR shall be transmitted to the responsible Project Repre-sentative/ Contractor with instructions to provide the fonoving information on the CAR:,

' A.

Cause of,the condition adverse to quality.

B.

Proposed action which will be taken to correct existing con-dition and the, date by which action will be completed.

C.

Proposed action which will be taken to preclude recurrence of the condition and the date by which action vin be completed.,.

l

. D.

The signature of responsible individual proposing the correc-tive action.

E, Date of response.

l 4.6.4. Upon receipt of,the response, the Field QA/QC Manager shall evalu-see the proposed corrective action for acceptability. If the re-sponse is acceptable, the Field QA/QC Manager win indicate his concurrence by signing and dating the CAR Form.

4.6.5 An unsatisfactory response or lack of response within the required' time frame 'shan result. in the Field QA/QC Manager contacting the responsible Project Representative / Contractor to require 4-melista corrective action. Failure to resolve the problem will result in the Field QA/QC Manager referring the condition to the next high-er level of management for corrective action.

i 4.6.6 When it has been verified that corrective' action has ' een satis-

~

b factorily implemented, the Field QA/QC Manager shan sign and date the CAR indicating that the CAR is completed.

g NUCLEAR INSTALLATION' SERVICES COMPANY

=-

&qaiO.TiWQRW.L'nC.'..y M5i%'iQ i } % 'd. :'.LG.k.EL,2.},Gi. W ?% ';~ TL.v..':'Q:.. ;<;TM.;.

e r%

k E.S. No. - 142 PAGE 8

13 OF ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION REVISION F

6/25/81 DATE 4.6.7 The Field QA/QC Manager shall maintain a f'ile and status, log of active and completed CARS together with any associated documen-tation.

5.0 References

'5.1 ASME Section III, Division 1 5.2 ANSI N42.2

~5.3 NISCO Quality Assurance Manual 5.4,10CFR50 Appendiz B

~

5.5 10CFE21

_v e

~

A

=

l

-' NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY

., = = =

l E -

.g...

m. -

c.Cu 3......c - r.P,w1*f4Bf.14p'gy:7tv.*Tursgirm ;

%.Wa'y,r. y} :.y,.* $ %

-r

,.r 3 _, ; -.e

.-,,%,N N.a q.,

h '.r

--i.

y,5=88 yg*pg

+ '

  • t y LM A-i.-

y43 M

.' 3 '.....

w.s ;

... Ju w

%...*.S.

.N!

,....,i._/_ _.. -. '. _ _

~

.,__..,'"P#.~'*-

"; e ~.2.g s.

. ~

~^

- -. - ~

.,, ~.T T i"%." =~A;*Wy E.S. th.

Id2

_ l p,

k. [O PAGE OF 13

~_

.t 6/25/81 7

F DATE REVISION ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION e

\\

ATTACHMENT #1-

~

e r

.. = = :

,w.

  • .~

~'~*=**s.---

ec po.et.o.eos=.cs msroes

' a-y 1

ea.-

sess ucuama,.m a a.,e e

s 2

..t

~. ~.

. ~..

5 4

_-_.-....s-...6

.e

.s 8

. s,..=.

c s -

a.se.ca.ev c

cz-.a -S.A se b a a aa.s I.

7 1

. ~

~..

.l

.. k.... - 9 8

.wi e

sa t-10 i

. e.

w

. ~ -..

2

.. s..swi

...c n

t

=

t

--*.... ci

.cs O="

O"*~-

.. s r...

e, n.

O 6.i.

...cs c 0 a

-ar r

a.u.n........o.. _.

.. f.

o..~_.. o.

s........ o...._.. s_.. _.. o...

m u....

n

..-.c,-

a._

.e

- = _. _ _.

u t

...g..

', NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY x.. A-w s w + 2. w.x

..m.,. m..,.

r W

w w w

^

e

.X*.

E S. Na.

14._2, 1

g,gScg

. ~-7 PAGE OF 6**

6/25/81 t

R E vlSION F

DATE-ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

.+.

. ATTACHMENT 82 - RED _

. -~

2, NISC e

g l

t 6.

- ' '. - }.

.,,..(

~

Ta0 Attached Date:

1

,~

OFIELD ENGl ]

~

O ES G lh3 EE.ft i

' pf y n

~.

Oc e,

I r,

siallation Services. ComDany MOvy OR USE. T HE.

MAI ens Al. OR COMPONENI 10 wHICH THIS 5 AT TACHED r,l 3

V.

J H

IDENTIFICATON/ DESCRIPTION OF MAT ERIAL/ COMPONENT:

1" CKD M.h}e * /& c.>.I '. -

1 THE MATERIAL OR COMPONENT DESCRISED *ABOVE IS HEREBY PLACED ON '

. *. * ?. - HOLD STATUS FOR THE FOLLONING. REASON:.

I O AWAITING INSPECTION OINCOMPLE'TE SHIPMENT O AWAITING ACCEPTANCE BY NISCO'S. CODE NSPECICM O INCOMPLETE / INCORRECT DOCUMENTATION 8 NCR*

I i- ' *.

~'

g.gggy UNAUTHORIZED - REMOVAt. OF TH6 leg. OR DihREGARD CF IME t

e6TRUCTIONS HEREON CDULD RESULT IN IMMEDI AT E DISCHARGE.

~

r

.~

..,.. s.

'az y.:. :..... ; ~,.

~.. ;.* -

.***.s n.

.. ~...

.. '...' T e -

t-

~.

  • t=.* ' s '. ?

..... ~

r.

~

c

,s

...s

~~

. ~ -

, -~....

. y a.....

N11 CLEAR.lNSTALLATION SERVICES COMPANY..

v.-

m.m.+m. w.g..m.s..,n:a. ;.

., n.:.,

.,....,.n

.:.--==.:-.......-

?...

_... m..

~

w-142

.. /M e

C.S. Na,

.O.a,7,f.S'CQ 3.1r 13 **

FAGE OF

-3 6/25/81-

'*t F

DATL_

REVISION ENGINE CRING SPECt FICATION 7

8 3__

ATTACHMENT h.

- * ~ ":,.

-h..

+

1 1

=in INSPECTION REPORT s.,..

w

!-@---" * '.t E C Elv lN G

  • ====e a*=*r p.e wy w aset=e* 2 o.

emisma:

= = = ' = = =

o.3, ruar... -

-l r

N!SCO um:

.. PERT E I

MT g

1 1

3 h

5 h$

3 lJ! Q' g h.

!! r:gi ". !

3 h*

1 a

)

l.{.

,l,i a, _i it ! si Pi l i ll il l.

t "1,

e I.

a esa v

-m t

Deter a,,2;_

s.,

.t Freeeeeney kingetElems.*

a-w ~ WFi Ramanne ed Serwee Teen T

Td48 l-

. pere! Cheemstee,seem tehr hometet Ca.e O pt/A.=

g.

  • - *=

.4 g

~

i g

g j,

f21

_ f79 I

tal 839 g,,, '

Int *

, (4)

_ Dele:

PeePeses Sy Dates

..;:.3 ES=eposee DF1 Title Title _

  • 3

-.g,.

m.

.t.

3 *......

=

a

-s

. a,.,...

  • .,5.
  • g

~

,. ? g * :..,

3'...

~

' ~,, *.,

  • .4,1=.

.e

,.,P.

e

..'*2 g*..-

p

..*.*s=%',%..<-

.s

.. =..

a.

.o

  • ',* *. * ! E.
  • k n.

t s

s

-g,

,.. 4

'; =,.... S.

s*

".a 1

..., _.<_ u..

..... ~.

.. 1QN.,SE.3 VICES COMPANY.

Ji -

N'"dal6p-; ~.

4%

.,%e q=..., %s.g%*m.w w a om.m,,,,;g,,p 7

  1. w *.sf.5

.m-f3, -,.

7

-e

-,e-

.c,

-i,'y.i.----y. - - -

g.--._--------.-e.--.,.-e,-,

--'s-'-v'~**v

' - - - - - *. e -.

b

.i ~.........'

-..... j

, n,,

I42 i

E.S.f4..

,.p,gy* g-rg PAGE _3D_OF U, -

6/25781 g

N t*

R VISI N-F DATE ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION l

o

.._ )

ATTACHMENT #4_

~r..

.n.

4

. r.

+

1

^

pzcEa soonCourtm9mCE atPott LEE y

}

Project 80stDWOIMANCE IICR DISPOSITION ETC DATI MTE RIMAnts aCR Cuslip(R At aut3 (CIWOIOil/5fSTEM AFFECTEDDnTE.

RDIEW REVIN C105ES T.

2 p.

b t

g

-.g e.

=

f.

a.

T

.x.

y.

=

s, r

.r g

r

.5

,.s

=

4

?.

t s

==

  • ~..

NUCLE R l$ST. ALLATION SERVICES CDNIPANY G 5k-.WM,

M;.:im.. v.:W?m. m...m.:gm:.;.=y#.;...

., :.s.......,..... _..

- W.w./u.;i.r.%o.cmt s; swe.t_mwa----

e t

142

..h E.S N3.

f~I,[*JESUlr)

~

13 13 PAGE OF

~'

6/25/81_

p REVISION F

OATE ENGINE ERING SPECIFICATION ATTACMMENT 45_

CORRECTIVE ACTION ' REPORT TO "31'2*"

m s?

eram ssans sa.,e ses

_w

.I 1 44 4,,

talsco

.,u.,v s m om warn neQM mo< peon ee aucus se O soc =hao' ab' apow *=

J.4,m su. Pres.st sape==== tat 8'*/Ca** r"--

4 nass t e coer.etive A. s poswunw crisms.):

-l 1

3 i

t de

) y.

..s

  • '. j 6

.s Defssionsyt

. ar.

. r

=

I g.

=

i,,.._

.-.-....s.

.y freymeed C.erestive Astians

,}.

.?

s, 3;

s-

.. ~

g s

o

~

4

.. ~.

i..,

,g,.

on/oc 'Mr.

m.t.s-J,,.*

~

. 4, p._

W

s..:

4.

a m.s.s js e

,3.

4 c.c ca a

04/9c ?Isr. '

t

- ' ~. -

.f.

.r.-

'-y.e.(*(Y.

.. r. ;

  • r..

. a.. - - ;.. ;

w.

~....,e..

r...z

.S

.r

,s..

g

. a.

1 3

a.

s r.

4

. ~s..

.=

s

,. ~,

. :... :.u.w...a..,. w

. :.. - +....

' C _.. c,.

. c,,

~..

. *..~

  • _ i

...m

. _.. l' #._,, m.. c.

ys-t::

O_MPAN,Y

.. 3.vs t.. s. _r..j -_.r.p.14..'. t y p*p,;

-.c.,.,....,,.e

,, %.g,, w,,g.g., m,.c a ~g. % u,. _

w 9....*..r.

_ _ _ -