ML20117F457

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:38, 15 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev F to Procedure TBP-12, Nonconformances & Discrepancies
ML20117F457
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/17/1981
From: Gore J
TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20117F125 List:
References
FOIA-84-205 TBP-12, NUDOCS 8505130250
Download: ML20117F457 (21)


Text

" .. - _ . . .. _ . . . . 1 l

\

TOMPKINS BECKWITH, INC.

' _ ___ Waterfore S.E.S. Unit 3 l Louisiana Power & Light Co.

g' Kiliona, Louisiana

)

Proc. No. TBP-12 Rev. "E" Page No. 0-8  !

Title:

NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREDANCIES (TB Doc. Control Stamol PROCEDURE COVER SHEET Changes DATE COMMENTS Concurred By:

2 IEl Add to Paracraph 5.5 It'm s C; Revise Paragraph 6.1.6 Item A to include 'MC"; I Add Paragraoh 6.3.4; Revise Paragraphs 6.4.1 .

and 5.4.2; Add Exhibit B.7

.g [g.p,h Revise to incorocrate Ebasco & LP&L commen I g 3/17/81 T/7 K ESASCO SERVICES '

INCORPORATED QUALITY

, d 5, g\'{.

I

. g[ \ ., I '

ASSURANC ENCW5 f_' ,A S \ e . ' + '%

I J. h a,-

This DecGrient is:S y, v-

$s g Aev chtnowicomgwets e% @0 -

-- * ,@~m Noree: .nco-u e .h , . (V

,,,c

.n n. .m.

4,e c.mm t s.

  • . O?.'iPi"b.. - c _,,,,.,!T*~; . - .~. -

or o.r. V EEi.E;.5 ED F C ' . ..u'- _ . ,". ._. ,. .)

D n.,. ,

NOTE:

t... me.i .no n womit 4 / ',/Ly

/3 R. . of inis coeumem, w th o- e T , m ---- i CCd -

w.tnout comments, es for sea.rs:

coa.oem. ace witn ene .oei.e.o..

no.e v.cas.ons oniv .n in no w.v een . eves th. minuts:tur.c or con.

tr.ete itom f wt! r spon9!D.Hty 1or o.i ., y of .n en.t ..ii. .ao.

mert. . .no accum.nt.uor in wies .cco, ne. wi in. e r.

Bv:Mh' 8505130250 841105 PDR FOIA PDR Date: .r- /f-// DERNABEB4-205 PRE?ARED BL .

t%N-APPROVED BY:

e- _

SiGNATLAE

, 1. n 1

,I DATE pa

~

OA Suoevvisor TITLE

&" 7 l % '>-* Project Engineer SIGN ATU RE DATE TITLE l

[ pg SIGNATURE 2 /:/

DATE OA Site Manager TITLE f

r nAT;: _ . .Tm a ny e. i t a s ._ _ . _

I. -

TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. TBP-12

. Jacksonville, Florida o7' Rev. "F" TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREPANCIES Page I of 8 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to establish the methods for the control and disposition of Discrepancies and Nonconfaming items.

2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This procedure applies to Discrepancies and Nonconfoming items under the control of Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc., which cannot be corrected through other pstablished systems, i.e. houseke'eping discrepancies, design errors, imcomplete hardware installations, et..

2.2 This procedure applies to all Nonconfomances issued to Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc. for corrective action.

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 Tompkins-Beckwith Quality Assurance Manual 3.2 10CFR50, Appendix B - 1977, Q.A. Criteria for Nu. clear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants 3.3 ASME Section III, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (1974, Summer '76 Addenda) 3.4 QC-W3-NY-11a - QA/QC Reauirements for Safety Related Equipment and Services for the Process Piping Installation (Ebasco Services, Inc.)

3.5 Tompkins-Beckwith Procedure TBP-37 " Piping Installation" 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Discrepancy - A deviation from specified requirements (including procedures) that can be readily corrected in accordance with standard approved operating procedures for specifications based on good engineering practice.

4.2 Nonconformance - A deficiency in characteristic, documentation or procedure which renders the quality of an item or service unaccept-able or indeterminate. Examples of a Nonconfomance include: physical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documentation; or deviation from prescribed inspection or test procedures, drawings, Code and Contract requirements.

. . . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . n . .. . . _ . _ _ . . _ _

j

~

<w TOMPKINS BECKWITH, INC. TBP-12 N o*

> Jacksonville, Florida Rev. "F" TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREPANCIES Page 2 of 7 NOTE: Nonconformance Reports will not be generated for:

(1) Rejected welds considered in-process, as a result of NDE, provided there is a documented process control, and repairs are made in accord-ante with approved procedures.

h

-- - -d (2) Physical defects Inc1. co not require engineering evaluation and can be brought back into conformance by means of an established approved procedure. i.e.,

End prep damage, pipe or hangers which are fabricated too long must be cut to meet design requirements,

, and surface indications which can be removed by grind-ing and do not violate minimum wall.

NOTE: Surface indications which are not a result of T-B's work activity (related to manufacture or fabrication) shall be brought to Ebasco's attention via NCR.

5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The Quality Assurance Supervisor shall be responsible for:

A. The reporting and documentation of deficiencies discovered at the jobsite.

B. Reviewing and approving Nonconformance Reports prior to their issue.

C. Reviewing the disposition provided by Ebasco on Nonconformance Reports for compliance to the Code prior to implementation.

D. Immediately advising the Quality Assurance Manager of any and all defects which, if not corrected, could result in a substantial safety hazard to the public or the environment.

E. Issuing written.stop work orders if required to assure that additional work is not performed until the evaluated disposition is received from Ebasco.

F. Verification and closure of Ebasco generated Nonconformance Reports.

_ 7 .--

\)

TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. No ' TBP 12

> Jacksonville, Florida p.,

TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREPANCIES Page 3 of 8 5.2 The Quality Control Engineer shall be responsible for: '

A. Assuring that discrepancies at the project site are reported on a Discrepancy Notice (Fom 9002) or recorded on the appropriate Quality Assurance Record, as applicable (i.e.,

Weld Record Sheet, NDE Report, Inspection Report).

B. Evaluating the dtscrepancy reported and precaring a Nonconfor-mance Report (Form 6009) when conditions specified in 4.2 dittate.

C. Securing from the Project Engineer a disposition for the noncon-fomance er discrepancy reported.

D. Assurance that corrective action is taken to correct all deficienctes.

E. Issuing orders to stop work on all work affected by the nonconfomance.

F. Assurance that discrepancies are identified by appropriate means as described in this procedure.

C -

N G. The application and removal of Nonconfoming Tags (Form 8003) for items and work described in a Nonconfomance Report (Fom 6009) or Discrepancy Notices.

5.3 The Project. Engineer is responsi'ble for detemining the disposition to be taken regarding discrepancies and recommended disposition for nonconfomances.

5.4 The Project Manager is responsible for initiating the action to be taken to correct deficiencies and nonconformances.

5.5 The Quality Control Inspector is responsible for:

A. Reporting di'screpancies and nonconfomances to the Quality Control Engineer.

B. Verifying that the corrective action taken is acceptable.

C. Surveys in accordance with paragraph 6.3.4 L

. _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ . . . __ _ _ :_ _ . J.-

TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. No TBP-12

> Jacksonville, Florida

.. F "

TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREPANCIES 4 of 8 Page 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 Discreoancy Notice (DN) 6.1.1 Discrepancies detected at the project site by Quality Control personnel shall be reported to the Quality Control Engineer on a Discrepancy Notice (Fom 9002).

6.1.2 #mance p(Fom

ac 8003).ecantNoitem shall or repair be tagged with = Noshall M installation be performed on thDiscrepant condition until Engineering has cispositioned the Discrepancy Notice. .

6.1.3 Discrepancy Notices lacking a recomended disposition re-quire a recomendation from the Quality Control Engineer.

6.1.4 The Quality Control Engineer shall send the Discrepancy Notice to the Quality Assurance Supervisor who shall review the report and do one of the following:

A. Approve the recommendation made, or provide a new recomendation.

B. Issue a Nonconformance Report when dictated by the Criteria in 4.2.

C. Void DN's written in error.

6.1.5 Should a Nonconfomance Report be issued by the Quality Assurance Supervisor, he shall record the NCR number in the soace provided and the Discrepancy Notice shall be considered closed.

6.1.6 Discrepancy Notices having been reviewed and concurred with by the QA Supervisor and for which no NCR is issued shall be sent to the Project Engineer who shall:

A. Complete and sign the " Disposition Required " portion of the fom with a copy being forwarded to the QA Supervisor, a copy to the ANI (for Class 1, 2 and /

MC items only) and the original to the person respon-sible for correcting the deficiency.

I

TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC.

o' TBP-12

> Jacksonville, Florida Rev. "F" TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREPANCIES Page 5 of 8 6.1.7 All DN's will be closed within 30 calendar days after initiation where practical (i.e., limited building access or area access, material receipt, schedule, etc.).

6.1.8 When the deficiency is corrected, the corrective action taken is recorded by the responsible supervisor who also signs the Notice.

6.1.9 The QC Inspector who made the inspection after the cor-rective action is taken removes the NC Tag, signs the notice and sends it (with any Inspection Report required by the disposition attached) to the Quality Control Engineer, for review and approval and if approved, the Discrepancy Notice is closed.

6.1.10 Should the corrective action taken be rejected by the Quality Control Engineer, a new notice shall be initiated and this action (including the new DN -Number) recorded on the original notice which is then closed.

6.1.11 Copies of closed DN's shall be given to the QC Inspectors who originated them.

6.1.12 Discrepancy Notices which have been closed are sent to the QA Document Controller for filing in the Master File.

6.2 Nonconfomance Report (NCR) 6.2.1 A Nonconfomance Report (Ebasco Fom 6009-11/5/77) shall be issued by the Quality Assurance Supervisor when dictated by the criteria of paragraph 4.2. No repair or further instal-lation shall be performed on the nonconfoming condition prior to receipt of the dispositioned NCR from Ebasco.

6.2.2 The Quality Assurance Supervisor describes on the form the nonconformance and the Project Engineer detemines and records the recommended disposition.

6.2.3 The Project Engineer shall not take more than twenty (20) l days to reco:miend a disposition.

6.2.4 The original Nonconfomance Report is then forwarded to the j Owner or his designee for review and concurrence.  ;

~

TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. No TBP-12 3 Jacksonville, Florida Rev. "F" TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES & DISCREPANCIES Page 6 of 8 6.2.6 The disposition of nonconformances which have the concur-rence of the Owner or his designee shall be reviewed for Code compliance by the Quality Assurance Supervisor and the T-B Inc. ANI as applicable.

6.2.6 After review by the Q.A. Supervisor and the ANI, the Noncon-formance Reports shall be sent to the Project Engineer who shall issue written instructions to imolement the corrective action required.

NOTE: The ANI shall review NCL'- against Code Class 1, 2 and MC items only.

6.2.7 When the corrective action has been completed, inspected by Quality Control and verified to be acceptable by the Quality Control Engineer, the Nonconformance Report is closed.

6.2.8 The Nonconformance, (yellow copy) with the attached corrective action instructions and inspection report, are sent to the Quality Assurance Supervisor for filing in the Master File by the Q.A. Document Controller.

6.2.9 The Nonconformance, (pink copy) and associated documentation shall be forwarded to Ebasco by the QA Supervisor for final verification of the corrective action taken.

6.3 Tagging 6.3.1 The Quality Control Engineer shall assure that items and/or werk described on the Nonconformance Report of Discrepancy Notice are tagged with Nonconforming Tags either at the time of detection or wnen the report is issued.

6.3.2 Upon completion of the specified corrective action and acceptance by Quality Control and the ANI, when required, the Q.C. Inspector removes and destroys the Nonconforming Tags.

6.3.3 Should the investigation of a nonconforming item determine that it be rejected, tnen Quality Control shall tag the item with a Rejected Tag (Form 9001) and the item shall be moved to a controlled scrap area at the site or removed from the site.

. _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . ._ _ . __ . -- - T. L_ --

TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. TBP-12 No

> Jacksonville, Florida Rev.

"F" TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREPANCIES Page 7 of 3 6.3.4 Surveys shall be performed quarterly as a minimum, by Q.C.

inspection personnel, to verify tags are attached to the discrepant and nonconfoming items. Form GP-723-ill shall be used for this survey and transmitted to QA Records upon completion. j NOTE: Any item not accessible for tag verification shall be brought to the attention of appropriate management for resolution.

6.4 Control 6.4.1 The Ouality Control Engineer, or his designee shall. issue DN numbers to the Inspectors. 4 6.4.2 The Quality Control Inspectors shall initiate and process the DN's in numeri; cal secuence.

6.4.3 The Quality Control Engineer, shall maintain separate logs which indicate the status of all Discrepancy Notices and Nonconformance Reports (Exhibits 9-1 and 9-2).

6.4.4 The logs shall be updated continuously as the documents become available or are completed and the following recorded as a minimum.

A. DN/NCR Number B. Des-cription C. Date Issued D. Name of Initiator E. Date Closed F. Name of 0.C. Inspector 6.4.5 A summary of open or unclosed Nonconfonnance Reports shall be included in the monthly report of QA/0C activities to the Quality Assurance Manager by the Quality Assurance Supervisor.

6.5 DELETED 7.0 AUDITS 7.1 The implementati.,n of this procedure will be audited by Quality Assurance in accordance with Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc., Procedure TBP-8.

TOMPKINS-BECKWITH, INC. No TBP-12

~

> Jacksonville, Florida R w. "F" TITLE: NONCONFORMANCES AND DISCREPANCIES Page 8 of 8 8.0 EXHIBITS 8.1 Nonconfoming Tags Form 8003 (with Foms Guide Attached) 8.2 Nonconformance Report Ebasco Fom 6009 (11/5/77) (Foms Guide Attached) 8.3 Rejected Tag Fom 9001 (with Forms Guide Attached) 8.4 Discrepancy Notice Form 9002 REV. 0 (6/27/77) (Fortra Guide Attached) 8.5 Status of Discrepancy Notices Exhibit 9-1 (6/27/77) (Foms Guide Attached) 8.6 Status of Nonconformance Reports Exhibit 9-2 (8/8/77) (Foms Guide At+ ached) 8.7 Nonconfoming Tag Survey Fom Form GP-723-111 (Forms Guide Attached) Z e

S

, ,n _

. FORMS GUfDE FOR FORM 8003 NONCONFORMING TAG h Enter the Item or Identification Number h Quantity Nonconforming h Enter Purchase Order Number, if applicable

@ Job Number h Remarks Space Provided to Include Additional Information, as needed h Enter Vendor Name, if applicable h Name of Person Rejecting the Item (s) h Date of Rejection h Reason for Rejection th Tag Number Applied to Item

/ mu R O. NO.

O m

\;g gau.

.!OE MO.

O~,

Red Celc-cn Tec

. Half QEkG.WA E

E O 8 @

w vtuxz m E

v w.w 0 m @ off Color mo.:

j rot @ S3}om wo. @

N = ova.u. cam u. =cn acca w

meemeee -. -

-wa.=+= . -*

..,,,-., .,_,. p-----+-----m,

- - - ,- use me ese,---., ewe.-,y9y---=_-, sea-e--w

-,--,-y.-_- . .

. i

FORMS GUIDE FOR FORM 9001 REJECT TAG h Enter the Item or Identification Number .

h Quantity Rejected

@ Enter Purchase Order Number, if applicable h Job Number h Remarks Space Provided to Include Additional Information, as necessary

@ Enter Vendor Name, if applicable h Name of Person Rejecting the Item (s) h Date of Rejection h Describe Reason for Rejection f

/

nu (T) ;nu. GB i

g.c. we. Q Jos no. Q O REMEEZ6 hr This for::

N is colort -

O e Q a e.

E' VEnto2. @ n REJECTE.D SY _Ei F02 l N - cus.ucu m ,inc. 02xemi IL

= - =-:_-. _ _ _ :- - _- _ . .

. _ = . . _

Sees.11/L77 EDASCO SERytCES INCDQPOR ATED p,,,,%

QU ALITY A55Uf1ANCE * # *# #* ****"

. REPORT =c.n, NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Y' D*"

  • Na'" *" '" 2" s,. 4e INSTRUCTIONS: (3 beck of formt "' * " " '
  • C6lENT OR BROJECT L& 4 OR AWING NO./ S P E C NO. 43 4 Supp6f E R. C ONS T R U C TI C OR CONTRACTOR ua D.C . NQ. IS8 4 5 3 DEsCRe= TION Or COMeONENT. paRT OR svaTEMsee 6
t. DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE '" (Irems Irwolved. Specificerien. Coele er Svenderd to Which trems Do Nor comply, Submir SenerCh if Applicable)

{

l l

l e.

NaME ANO SISN ATW F DE RSON RE PORTING NONC ONFORMA NC E IS* TIT LE /C OM D AN T ggTg ($

8 8 9 I I. REComuENDED D!$ POSITION (Submir SirerCh if Apelicable)

J N AME aND StGNaTWRE OF PERSO E C OMM ENDlN G OfS POSITION (118 TIT LE/C OM*a N T DaTE tia, i 11 1 12 I I I. EVALU ATION OF DISPOSITION BY ESASCO, REASON FOR DISPOSITloN HS3 i

t

! l V. CORRECTIVE ACTION"$4{. Required @4)[ Noe Reevired (14) 5 Yd SI ' ENGINEERING I OU ALITY ASSU R ANCE C CONSTRUCTION I

[iOTHER NAME (SI GN ATW RE! . 'N AME LSIG N A T WR E NAME LS e G N a T W R E I NaME (StGN A TWR E.

15 15 _

15 15 OATE DATE CaTE OATE C ACCEPTED ] REJECTED ] ACCEPTEC ] REJE CTED ] ACCEPTED ] REJECTED ] ACCEPTEC ] R EJECTED

[ ACCEPTED WITN COteW E NTS ] ACCEPTED WITN COMMENTS 9 ACCEPTED WITN COtted E N TS ] ACCEPTED WITN COMMENTS Y 1. VERIFICATION OF DISP 05! TION t REQUIRE [ NOT REQUIRED "

d ama.marmens

-A,- - O .A,- O r-- >--n--- -_m -e-- - - - _ _ _ - - - - - -----em--m-- -w we -w w*-us---ww- - - -w sowwam w--- - - - -----Y-'mmwy- -*--T------------i-- "y-ww- '-w '-y-w- ----e7- -u--

P Legend Identification:

Quality Assurance Supervisor T-B Project Engineering Ebasco

@ Quality Contol Engineer FORMS GUIDE FOR FORM 6009 EBASCO NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (1) @ Enter the next Sequential NCR No.

(2) h Clinet or Project (3) @ Drawing No./ Spec. No that the NCR Applies To (4) h Responsible Supplier or Contractor (5) @ Purchase Order Number (6) h Description of Component, Part or System that Applies to the NCR (7) h Complete Discription of the Nonconformance 3 (8) h Name, Signature and Title / Company of Person Reporting the NCR (9) h Date of the NCR (10) h Engineer Recomended Disposition (11) h Name, Signature and Tit 1e/ Company of Person Providing Recomended Disposition (12) h Date Disposition Provided (13) Completed by Ebasco (14) Completed by Ebasco Corrective Action Taken will be co@leted by the QC Engineer (T-B)

(15) Completed by Ebasco (16) @ Completed by Ebasco (17) h Enter Signature, Title and Date of QC Engineer Closing NCR

~

lL

,.__y_.-.-.

_,-. _., ,-_w_.-.__.e ,_-.., ____ _ ._ y ,yy, . , ,,. _ .m- m.

' DISCREPANCY NOTICE D. N. Numbsr Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc.

Date of Report (y Projtet: Wc.t:rf rd SES Unit 3 Contract: W3-NY-11 Job 723 Item Description Location System b P.O./ Contract No. @ DwgJSpec. No.

1. Discrepancy

Description:

2. Recommended Disposition: b l

l Provided By QC Review By: 'b Date b 3.NCN No. QA Supervisor Date b

4. Disposition Required:

Project Engineer b Date b

5. Corrective Action Taken: b Supervisory Position b Signature b Date b
6. Reinspection remarks: b OC Inspector b Date b
7. Accept b Reject b New DN No. b iss'ued (b

QC Engineer Date ( 52 2 )

p.m.%, o m

- - . - _ - _ - . - . _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ __ J T ~~ . ~ ~ T X ~ ~ T :. ~ : ~.. . L! _

,[ :. . . .

Legend Identification:

@ QC Inspector / Engineer

@ QC Engineer C QA Supervisor

@ Project Engineering Q Supervisory Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action FORMS GUIDE FOR FORM 9002 DISCREPANCY NOTICE 1 @ Enter DN Nunber and Date of Report 2 h Item Description 3 h Location of Desempant Item 4 h System 5 h Purchase Order / Contract Nunber 6 h Drawing / Specification Nunber 7 h Discription of Discrepancy 8 h Signature of QC Personnel Reporting the Disempancy 9 h Reconmended Disposition to be taken 10 h QC Personnel Providing the Recommended Disposition 11 h QC Review and Date 12 h Enter Next Sequential NCR Nunber, When Applicable 13 h Signs and Dates 14 h Enter Dispositien to be Taken or Forwards to Ebasco for Resolution, When Required 15 h Signs and Dates 16 h Individual Assigned the Corrective Action 17 h Supervisory Personnel Completes Corrective Action 18 h Supervisory Level, Signatum and Date of Corrective Action 19 h Sunnarizes Reinspection Activity 20 h Signature and Date of Person Performing the Reinspection 21 h Checks, Accepts, or Rejects Corrective Action Taken 22 Signature and Date of QC Engineer Accepting or Rejecting the Corrective Action

@ Taken

.. I

. . _ _ _ ~ ^

~ *

. . '*- :~~ - ~. .. .- . .;:_: . . --

a- TOMPK2NS-BECXWITH, INC.

STATUS OF DISCIEFANCI NOTICES ,

s Data of Date

.No. Subiect Notice Inso. Closed Inso. .

O Q , G -Q O O i!  ;

I I  !

l I l

j .

I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I

. t 1 I I I I I

- 1 I I 1 I- 1 I I

I I I I I l l

I I i

I 1

i l  : t. -i 1 l I

. ol  !

EXHIBIT 9-1 ' (U27/77)

~T~~---..---,..,.--2TT,,-,,.::----'...--1:--------,.~~.--....---,----.-,,---.~,-,-,----

FORMS GUIDE FOR m TRIT 9-1 STATUS OF DISCREPANCY NOTICES (1) QC Inspector Enters the DN Report No.

(2) Description of the Discrepancy Entered (3) Date DN Initiated (4) Initialsif Initiator (5) Date DN Was Closed (6) Initials of QC' Inspector j'y

! , 70H*KIMS-II:r4ITH, I!c.

5".L"~?S 0? UC5 W % 5:3 35 me ar,.r.

Es.

a

^

SoH eet Reties *r.ss .

.  !").esed Isso. 1 FOI O , 1 O I O I Q lQ l I l i l l l l

! l .

1 I I I l  ! I I I I I I I I I I l I I I 'l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I i l 1 -

1 I I I l l  ! I I I I I I l l l I I I I I

I I I I I I l

. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I l l I I I I

! I I I I l

! I I I I I.

! l l I I l l

! I l~ l l I l

!, I I . I I I l i l I I I I  !

I I I I I i i

. I I I I I I I I I I t2

c
E:5IT 9-2 (8/8/77)

_ , - , . , _ , , , , , . , _ - - _ _ . _ _ . _ , . - - . _ _ . , _ , _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ , . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ - . _ _ , . _ _ , . . _ _ . _ ___s

^

FORMS GUIDE FOR IXEIBIT 9-2 STATUS OF NONC0h70RMITY NOTICES (1) QC Engineer Enters Sequential NCR Number .

(2) Description of the Nonconformance (3) Date NOR Initiated (4) Name of Initiator (5) Date NOR Closed (6) Name of QO Inspector lU

--yw 9, _.. - -

m--w ' m -

e " ' ~ ~

~

, , FORM # GP-723-111 FORMS SUIDE h Building and Floor elevation Three inonth period DN and/or NCR Number Date discrepancy written Iso / Drawing No.

Weld and/or Item No.

Briefly describe discrepant condition c Information which will aid in locating item Location, i.e., actual elevation, column lines, azimuth, etc.

Intials and date by QC Inspector verifying tags are attached to item Initials and date by QC Inspector indicates a replacement tag was attached Oil to item h If item is not accessible; state reason, i.e, need ladder, etc.; initials and date of QC Inspector

=

i e e

m .es%-s. ,,.

- .- ---.-r w- - -- -- - ------ye-m- -a y -----e +

[I!i, f , I.  ;

\ .- E L

B I

S S -

E C

C A

N I

D E

C GA AL TP E

R D

E I

M GF AI R

O F

TR E

V Y

E V i R l U l S -

3 G 2 A 7 T -

P N O

G G I N T I # A M

R M O R L C

O @

F O N F O

C N

O N

E Z

LI AS I

R&

E TE AP MY T

Y C

N AN

) PO EI V RT CP SI I R DC FE S @

ED I

R B

Y E

L R E 0

/ .

DO NN U A Rl T

i DE LT M @

EI W _

0

) 5 O D O E 1

I UE R ST E

P SA I D @

Y &

. E # g G V # s D R R t U NC s S DN 1 i l: :l I  ; Il '

l 2  ;.. i ;'