ML20040G355

Supports OL Revocation

ML20040G355
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	02/03/1982
From:	Bartlett R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC
References
NUDOCS 8202120203
Download: ML20040G355 (7)

Text

- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ .

i 74 wo $adda 3F,au FRD" t UTid: Oct'.KET NU: BER -

I FA ft., ,,,

$2ccA b$wa'. $$@. < i

,,., t- .. Wmaad # WNa.uadakM ON60 y' h W

February .), 1982 1

, i: -

y

Dear friends:

I inclose the nuerous editorials, articles u

andletters that appeared in the Old Colony of f

~

Plymouth on January 28.

They make clear the widtspread distrust of Pilgrim I.

Citizens are critical of the Boston Edison management.

The company spent: , g ff hundreds of thousands of dollars to try to sell the # [j community on their trustworthiness. But they have > El'/gg 9 faL1ed.

[ DO]'E 198g

~

g5%

~

The company has been ' inefficient and

&c%e 13 careless and the people know it and are afraid that //  ?=

4 a.

something serious is bound to happen. Please note d1w strong-ly the lieutena) governor comes out against them.  ::

[;(

The attorney general hasltisso criticized Boston Edison h

for several months. LE

,m JE It is your obligation to protect us. t=

Our glectmen4 are too casual. One of them is , of course, un employee of Boston Edison. . So $'eir g,

meetkngs to not face up to realities. This conflict I

P'~;=

of interesb should be conrcted. We suggest that you EP revoke their license instead of fining Pi lgrim I.

=

ep tfully your ,

(\

u

'oY rt M. Bartlett G S 1 2

$ I-En 960 [

A resident for 47 years. Si i -

( .

ggg2kbo! O H _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

l ,

RfAL l 1 f

W POLITIGL V"W e

~

SCENE re lj  ;

- =

L -

~>

r=

j eill says Edison  :

x should lose its license."

lg V , BOSTON-Lt. Governor Tom sumption by thousands of barrels i  !

O'Neill today called on Governor day and saves consumers money, p it King to demand that the federal least on the short term.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission "flowever, there is no comparisdp revoke the operating license at between the amount of money saved Boston Edison's Pilgrim I nuclear in oil costs and the amount of mone,s -

power plant in Plymouth we would spend cleaning up ,

' Noting that the NRC wants to fine nuclear accident. -

Boston Edison $550,000 for 31 months " Pilgrim I, due to management

. of serious safety violations, O'Neill mistakes, has been, in fact, shut ^

I "For almost three years down, more than it has been on line, -

- \said, Pilgrim I has been a nuclear anyway.

pas pisaster waiting to happen. " Governor King should meet his "That plant is currently a danger responsibility to the public safety by M

to the public health and safety. It demanding that the operating should be officially shut down and permit be revoked, that NRC safety f

not re-opened until local, state and engineers be assigned full-time to '

federal officials are completely the site for at least a year, and that ,

i satisfield that all problems have all problems be corrected. l 4 >een permanently corrected," said "In addition, Boston Edison

, ;,3 TNeill, should be required by the federal and state governments to make a

~

p. "Even though he is a supporter of full disclosure of why they deceived j _

iuclear power, Governor King owes the NRC about safety conditions v:g t to the public to take action on what changes they will make t

+ ,

cetting the power plant's operating provide an independent monitorin icense revoked," said O'Neill.

capacity at 'he plant, and why the[

"I realize that when Pilgrim I is think the license should not be perating, it reduces oil con-permanently revoked. ( ;/

g l ps e '

L~, A .--. - "tCOLIO ll a lJ U/L.ls t13 thni11_It) .: 1A da ~ = - - -

- -"- 7JO[Al , -

c

. s

• I

[ vuesnoy panseAap

. ,e ue u

' iumutuo; A22 Thursday, January 28,1982 OLD COLONY MEMORIAL 1 sey l

'1 Aue '

'y

em m - - -

em -

" a o ]"*T D, , ~

i g < > _ _ _t _

4

/ \

Edison 4 ould be on probation Frasmard 6fr 7270 G4 1.ast week lloston Edison's Pilgrim merely reading the reports submitted There was c' Idence to warrant such a warning to Edison, even before this p/N , VENg/

.by the utifity. If a nuclear plant issnes 1 power plant was threatened with a laisst incident. / g[g[M k

P

$5$0.000 fine for violating operating procedures which apparently resulted a report saying that a mechanism at the plant is A-OK, then the NitC puts Last July a report issued by the anti-nuclear Critical Mass Energy , /((M/((,7 J

from serious mismanagement its stamp of approval on it and files it away. This is apparently what hap- Project (CMEP) ranked Pilgrim 1 problems. tenth on the list of nuclear plants

. Although that fine was the largest pened when, in 1979, lloston Edison told the NItC that Pilgrim's com- around the ceuntry with the highest ever proposed by the federal Nuclear number of reported incidents. ,.- c llegulatory Cummission (NitC), it is bustible gas control system met federal regulations. Ifad the NitC Its author, Itichard Udell, blamed , t not enough. Pilgrim I should be placed

• C

% staff bothered to check further, they the high number of incidents on _ ,

on probation.

$ Not only did the management at the would have found that it didn't.

" serious management problems."

In September of last year, the NIIC

{

plant violate regulations of the NitC Although there is a federal in- e i spector on duty at the Pilgrim 1 plant, reported that Pilgrim I rated "below ,

but they proceeded to cover up that average" in such areas as violation for more than one year. Why he did not check out the gas control I ff, system. NitC officials say he cannot management control, maintenance, - ,

)

they did that, no one (except lloston Edison and maybe the NitC) knows be responsible for checking out every radiation and fire protection and ( (,7(/ y system and mechanism in the plant. overall compliance with opr. rating for sure. That type of behavior is g

inexcusable. Ilut in the case of Pilgrim 1 the NltC regulations. (((( ,

t lloston Edison has been very should check fully.

1. careful in the past to ensure that their . The Pilgrim I license should be Even with these two reports the a NltC did not act. Pilgrim 1 obviously credibility remains intact in the community. After last week that placed on conditional status - with a warning to lloston Edison that the has its problems and something I 4 ~{

' license will be forfeited if further should be done, and done fast, to ,

credibility is surely lost. I k. I Ilut the utility is not (te only one to coverups or mismanagement of correct them. - w i {

safety systems occurs. Nuclear plants can' he run safely blame. '

The NitC, the federal agency and efficiently. The Millstone plants '

Additional inspectors should be in Connecticut, which v'ere rated

. / j, assigned to be the watchdog of the / 'I nuclear industry, has also been tax in assigned to Pilgrim I, as probation "above average" by the NitC, are an

/ \ -- 2 exainple of this. There is no reason p officers, checking on the accuracy of

-Q sts daties.

all' Edison's reports. and the work- why Pilgrim 1 can't be run the sampq To the N!tC, keeping an eye on

]

[ j 'vav. V .p

._h "c p pla'.ts too viten means manship of its employees. g

yg +%!,ng,$'

' h Q?]

7 hdA@ ggJh,y% pW p gyb d } y;gW x P 7,,3 :j(f  ; f,g,g;; ,/g*dyh!g $

@f

' ?g :k, ,

f f[>{

4

}(q,I;q f

1, 43jT

?

g

]'

I i

.yh * .

g L':@ .

{, *:

lf;  ;

eea f @'

{i reeo I yet hh e et ses i a

,s' .eh s ,k t ohht e

- et ab - ne es - r nimf d n- o eii te dch aeh a t t d oht k a ( y lp .

teit u shct lle f

v oh ht a ct d t a

eh oit w u e aei t t rt e at e t ca h r s i aq mdua n oh w rhus oddim d n -

t i t gumdi v ou n

} . h cdt e a ut o" t a d f oahnt t t s n ea est s i t D k bf t

nl t s y e

u po e i

a n ati l c hI n o rpe" c a ac el o ebt r er a e a e r ea hoo n Tcm t " ams ah t

a e en o n s c, e t o i atn bdm t n b f o lsb ad pd a tne or u" o sl uy s nwo l

egtod n nat o ueie sisdis ti t t o

- t gi nepmr gt s "e e t imei gd x e a hsgo hl a fe id t nda haiee rk n e e m n et atst r h he neh os t t efa ehE E t

t em

- aml wti " st ef lurh lad t c Pl we ee cd n n wre no t

r o

nt iet of or e Dt l d tht w mf ee ca a hma" e oh a r a v c psopadt a w

f o b .d t c" ic ep a rd o o oe ei wea v a iwt ii h at ml wobat e sd" ys aknt us "s o t

rdEma em aie is d eh o n

en h d r C st t n aer n )t ia ia ecl i

g_ Sel pa ial u efte la f

osee t s v p".he eu k vos epe s sl h ve st a or o yt uams t

en go c s r oen i t

n g airlie nm".Ct t t a oe y eb t r oI eh s ew,en d d n l le 'n f d4", . r eh ng ii lunepmgd bt emneNt, st co om l

i e a r e o yi* n is h et n.aiht s ehgnreimb rw cr pliwllelyrdb l

i V d d s c -

oar egi nn at yn g t m y t e e1. li a iou m aot n r h "e w h l

. I e ut l npo miel eakt i o aei o efit s t r r k kf pb l eer p r evi t

h ncsl pt nvh hu cp s euaIIcPeireol a" s e eu c atelaTaar srb a1 a saal To t

t r arSp q i o u pih mJ" deuehmvi o n ht t onh mlpC Gt pt swjt eh i t q t h qrt sd ye ergmc.iot

. ce, v n .h ooh enned e st nv omd t

agr a e at s atanst am r h o ei s . oCf "l

wna rj d h o S. oi m r.e 'I t a o e t e o t ti ia v N m rt ao rt n n e ,df r, l o a ep i

d ag; s ghf maa eo a nr c ac e Pm iei . n Us s pue r e nenot e onc eicvh g

. t ae ov urd mot I t nm d su l pi tr et mca - sr f

n eir ei ni o apmyct si tyt ,tn N rh m h s oar t cpo ondn me o pmt o o rt n imo e t

nmi lgt t t ac pst a s eur e A om Ch ws ue et ,nbl paor l

r. H E

iPtsCo eer st Cal g

uimnberh .dl t o ay dcpr sog et ,eos e n s r nel soln a n pi r l

t s erC r f i .i mCne or h ep t

t s! pa r p k s g N E'

R. "

A*

e ny h

t w

e t o ot r

t i

Nv h

ee l

a P a r gr eh qail o at g a a uedt uncced e et ar mp ne

,n nh at w s o r a t

e al a d

oh ist ey h

Nteis t

t sNiet seEa h domot r

g n ecd a

r n

ola.

a semmh af e

t iw nb er "a e

l o a na gf hla

.i t t of r s raie s et pt e s, noci ,ynt o t A su l

rt o n icd oh E >e b e f mt e s ne e r pa g t 'a e t amf immi t

R *6 C m PU i nl t h gdmk e n l

ig e s nl pa o v iaeiuwffiepit t

ial mr b em eavSeh i

ref w t

Tt t e nt a h ra e ge eiml t A n o e imtsr s o g k pu Ue laI mt emrguc rt t yt efr o 3, rd o p u h sa wf0 s st r s e d

M Omp usc ec eer a ooa , sdea s1 o es u .ho c gana ts 00. u euo R f t t

y Mer r . pngl cpx esns geit h m n 'a n g i r, 0t ot a, t

B ga a) t lut. erameAoi 8

s n a a ut iei ons nl NaeleCs I nl ci t

a. i m n na st t hi t eAspr e hu n e ms 1

a.  % et r 5 b acd a ndoimi b(

ra rS ewcct eh oh t bi c t Pa c n i uc i Noa I

mnN( u uN f of omtoh imaal t g

. j

[ .i g l i

• l

,F$ . I /4

. hj4W M wf 9 L

A N

O hW$W Q

a k~N j irr.

$c uQ P, ec.

, a 6'1 hy 9y ND d

, }'

tl m

$FMS 1

+ g, __

o o

c Mg%; ,Q-M, A*

k m

o c

o 2

9,nm  %

W

' pN' .qM 'I y

A p.}kf

?.

t b -

y e

Ni {w j -

s

yy-e .

%n

$N'

- J

8. ,

t .

2 $'

h'

,v e

[9 - WN,%je4'- fj w e .M hQ m  %'

e +f g~

e 7lC f hb;'

^

s. ,gNN1; A_ e$ N

- f .

.x /

4 t C

e e

UM]M1aMUN, f$Mg s

~

g J, mL g'

^

- / h.D .

M -

s -

4.NM 'hMfMO$D kN' . i pgQ%f, mwd '

w Mh ~

Y #j M

p$ ' .M3% .

1 Ib!h' Q d Me.D - AN lthWcS gQNh* S hJ4 f

.{ ] $kf . d.

g e mwf ~p + g ]U, u g j[ , W k' if y h.k [~Nb$g/. S%)fdrklI i

M hK' l

$ * . s I :g Qj} [dh ph!qDW% i ygr@agwmgp[$ $

w W i .  !

C Nd M .@Gc,.

~

k g-2;b@fl,M [ 1 N f h.eh$Mh'kf]g(

h.A i4' i

% fybNhpd

• h[G 7[ p((hb k, hh)n.k gk p A

%@- pzN,

,N / aMdW)%

gKNM ;p[~

h. k/ nW[' hQpt DMy j!

a f g+hqg%EM.

t u  ; p c

f b

th Whf g

ydh.M@jy f y g$QYM

memew yBW:a ewnrr %1 w

N - . , .

hy4 PT4%'Mn ~h I f

. ^

N1'$7 f

hwdDWiGr[Mi A M[ N $ $ $ $ dMhb OLD COLONY MEMORtAL

/

L JL J S Sears

, , ,c 1r% , . NOTICE

'!nDHE"i Boston Edison Tacks credibil'ty l no credibility. They even tied to the after #tecting radiation in excess of NltC. South Shore retidents should Dynarnite Dollar D; RSert in laSt Week'S pa lave incorrect Copy.

Of course the possibility is there at feder) standards leaking from a not feel safe knowing that this hoy do not have i j To the Editor: Pilgrim 1. Edison expects the public truck :arrying Pilgrim waste. company is running a nuclear power ater Miser or Pot I

iloston Edison faces the largest to believe everything its officials n the townspeople made an We. Sorry for any W Whe plant. What else are they covering fme ever fro m (fie Nuclear say- outcr3' for a better emergency up? I agree with Lt. Gov. O'Neil. ee e.

itegulatory Commission t NitC). When radiation was found im milk wartfg system, Edison promised it calling the fadity "a nuclear This time Boston Edison was caught at Pilmoth Plantation, or in shellfish wouldb e installed by the summer. It disaster waiting to happen." We hi the act They hid from federal in the bay, Edison blamed it on "old officials, mformation regardmg an radioactive f allout."

is yet c happen, Wh n the shutdown started early should stand behind him in his demand for revocation of the plant's gggggy euptosion prevention system. They When Pi' grim I has a leak or a l

said this system was in place and confarmed to federal requirements.

spill, we all know Edison's response last fill Edison claimed it would operating license.

only las t 10 weeks. The plant is still If there ls a major accident at hAJw h aw by now. "The public's health and down. Pilgrim I, lloston Edison will have U STATE RD.(RT,3R)mRb In fact-it did not!

I am eagerly awaning to hear safety was never in danger."

When reported that Edison was As 1.ttle as a year ago they were to blow the whistle on themselves.

still ajamant in their stance that flow can we trust them to Ict us g y g* g lloston Edison's appeal to the nuclear waste Pilgrin) 2 would be built, while know in time?

5

< transporting y Ex-LatgeWhite Eggs commission. llow can they pass this haphazardly, they responded by j' others in the financial community Atark A. Newby y Mushf00ms off ? Who can they blame lt on? saying they exceeded federal safety when the Three-Mile Island ac- knew itwouldn't. Plymouth All Bagged Apples - 3, guidelmes the following week the Let'sface it - tioston Edison has

' cident occurred. Edison spokesmen NitC reprimanded Boston Edison

,~

said, "It could never happen here." ,

,2,,.  ? ,iQ Q,y

.u.l R A

/ g I

Q g i" g a 9 N g h [w y$.kW h5 ' h N ' ' ' '

yeg -a ism _,q h

nhy.pT f Mf g%

s. v G ,f G, t$ ; gf gw,

@ j b%I 1

jm [ Es h [h (- , bll I I. II D ,ur s 5dl II '

'I $

ff t.NEn\ Q Ohh 1

To the fQfiror: citizens of Plymouth are evenly sp!!! of "misusnagement" at the station. barn M r. Tis.

I am reading with great interest in their reaction to having a " nuke" These charges from the NRC do ]

the recent eu'"inge between the in thear midst. I for one do not want to hea the not mae the people who are un- management of this plant defen n 7 anti nuclear Pilgrim Alhance and Hoth the alliance and Mr. Tis decided about nuclear power operation for which that may soi QUhd]

Mr. Itobert Tis, a spokesman for claim that the people of Plymouth pleased'o have the plant as their lose its operating licence due to such Pilgrmi t.

have mandated their point, that the neighbor It goes without saying how inattention to the safety of this area y 11 is enlightening to discover that voting figures represent a victory those peOle w ho are firmly opposed 8 v and the workers at the plant.

these Iwo adversaries still do in fact for their side. to nuclea* Power view these recent I hope that lloston Edison can pl .

attempt to commumcate with one w L=

• This all comes as a recent developm'nts - it confirms what make good its remaining ) cars in another. development. Ten years ago Boston has been s'id about Pilgrim I having AN EQU2 It is anyone's guess as to the ex- Plymouth. Ilut,if Boston Edtsen and 4 Edison enjoyed a cicar edge in a safety recJibtht Lome have ' its employees expect the pubiac to 1 6.DOd f3CilIlp tent to ahich either influences the popularity with the town's voting called the worst in the country.'

""!3MJ.MT.dWMW,h pow er plant is their " primary - }

basic outh>ok of the other. citizens. Now the signs seem to say Despite the assurances from Mr. paMR j

Most hkely we will have letters in that many more individuals question Tis, w ho firmly believes in the concern" then some " extraordinary the paper for many years to come, EXPA the place and role of Pilgrim I in benefits and economics of nuclear w hich seek to justify or discredit the Plymouth. actions" must become the order of 'COMPEhTqB power, it is clear that something is the day. The recent stories in the i plant and nuclear energy. It is ironic that Mr. Tis chose this wrong with the way Pilgrim I is l OCM and the Bosfon Globe indicate Of course, m thirty years time the time to begin a public defense of the managed. It is this high degree of that the so called primary concerns plant, due to excessive radiation status quo at the station - at the " mismanagement" tbit as much as could be nothing but hot air.

COntal build-up, will go permanently "off- same time the NltC issued charges anything is cripp!!ng the image of ime" and the only sounds will come against Pilgrim I, and that the NitC Pilgrim I, and raises the question

, R.N., Ass from the few guards on duty. is attempting to level the largest fine again and again as to the relatise Sincerely llut fer now, according to recent m the history of American nuclear safety of the plant. Christopher Newton '

polls and voting patterns, the reactors against Pilgrim I because The horses are already out of the Kingston f -

Pilgrim 1 2

'an accident waiting to happen' ff 6 g To the Editor: Edison and the federal regulatory show the shghtest concern over the

a. The safety record of the Pilgrim I sirtually nothing for the past t< s ,

agency - the NitC - have both numerous safety violations which years except pass the buck? e Nuclear Pow er Station, whether teamed up to make Pilgrim I an have taken place. Who should the public or private, is a matter of accident . waiting to It is up to ourselves to deman J ,

happen. people of Plymouth place their trust that these agencies act wilt A

grave concern to people w ho live Irrespor.sibihty ard negligence are a in if an accident requiring partial or responsibahty to public safety an within its shadow. The Nuclear an integral part of their dally [

total evacuation should take place? we intend to do so. i Hegulatory Com mission has not existence. Boston Edison - who sacrifices I n.

demonstrated any genuine concern L ~

Plymouth town govertiment has safety for profits? The NitC - the

.M' for puhhc safety. Where were they demonstrated an equal lack of fox guarding the chicken coop? Cheryll.ynn Canmstra  !

4 k' .h, iurmg the past three years while respamsibihty by their failure to Town government who has done

%] this latest gross safety violation was Plynmu(

,u ___

n . --

.g E;M+.v W M M (UfRN % 55i N

t Mhki.hk ,h u m a m m e $ M h k Nkkk h h [ k h b }0IkkN h N N b d h

y ' ' '

7

! L JE']

h Sears =

, , - - J__'  ; ,

NOTICE Boston Edison acks credibilit =="e"She washersonpa;e 50 of the x Dynamite Donaf Days N inSof t In IJ51 *tek's paper

'l,othr Eiblor: ouh o Ibility is there at af ter stecting radiatw,a La e s4m of no credibility. They even tied to the federj standards leasies re,m a NitC. South Shore residents should lave lnC0ff eCI CCp y' llosto86 Eihson face a 15r lar s . P sUlm l. Edison expects the public not feel safe knowing that this fine carr fruin the * "t ng Hs officials truck a:Tytng Palgrim w aer.* choy do 001 havo the Ne>'ulatory rutnin ession (. *' T WhO the townspe$e a kau an company is running a nucicar power '

Vater Miser ce Pol Pan

'Ihis r<me huston E h " ' .'" 4*

t hen radiation was tound im milk outcr> for a tetter e w s.w y plant. What else are they covering Cyclo. Sorry fu any incon-in the act T he t id i" 48 i Phinoth Plantation, or in shellissh wa rnt.g s) stem. E.he.

• 6'*=m*4 it up? I agree with I.t. Gov. O'Neti CO.

olhclats. inform tha: r' would)c Installed by (14 s$wese ): calling the facihty "a nuclear e mpimlon pres ento,n s '

ni b . on bhamed it on "old d'h JcHbe JHuut.' is yc(t[h8pgeWM% AU PWMa==e wen.nnemutasea'sas " --

~# W N Ma %-

- . . , _ . - - s

..c GO BANAh

"'~ E30ston Ecison,s unwi' ing ness, Saul _ thb smst -

.g, ...,,,.

Drop us 10 sa"eguarc pubLic is a33a ing JDQ

' Boston Edison has one of the worst Maybe it is time for the NitC to

$ hh To the Editor:

Hoston Edison's gross inability wor ker safety records. Now the NitC proposes to fine the utility for failure revoke lloston Edison's operating bcense.

The Old Colony afemntfal and/or unwtHingness to safeguard 7 to comply with important safety Sincerely, the public in its day to day operation regulations and falsifying records. I.ynne Wilkinson , {00g ag W Pt 99c m snvnes readers to espress their of Pilgrim I as evidenced by the What is next? Plymouth i unmns ou d"V I"Pic of mierest Nuclear Itegulatory Commission's I y v. rlttnp /circrio the editor. findings and subsequent proposed Wheneser possible. JCfferS

" "" 'Know nukes' equals no nukes = BANANAS "u"" M";"""J:,"'M ""g'n""n"1llain"The "6nt SunklSt Navel g'

len gth of Boston Edison made conscious To the Editor: leaving a legacy of lethat radiation for generations to come. =0 RANGES 88e Allletters must be signed and ( albeit " unintentional" choices to Boston Edison has proven that must include a telephone risk the safety of its workers and the one's worse fears are correct.

Edison's slick advertising cam- Indian River Red number for vertitration pur- public at large. In rt sponse to this They are a company guilty of paign of "know nukes" has now F

outrageous rnismanagement the

'clectmen have assured the people deception of federal officials. A turned agata.t them. Yes, we are = GRAPEFRUIT company that has for the past three beginning to know nukes. "Know ytra Fancy, Large Ret l'e'm.a letters a sli#8dnut he f Plymouth that they will be in close lished %stnM I'f with Hoston Edison. years has been knowingly risking nukes" equals "no nukes." '

g

,3.M uhin t ryuc3t only e mtact our community to a hydrogen ex-

{ \ ouldn't it be more appropriate to plosion, an accident which would Thank you Boston Edison World,s F, inest i uhen the cihtor frcl> there h utlictent justshcation in in close contact with the NitC have devasted our environment Gall Itced i rding Edison's violations? Dul taking thousands of lives and Ellisville ,g te to senil .a lef fer. u rsie f.rtter for that matter, where has the NitC l f

fo the rehtor3r g 4 W3f. II" 9M.

pis snouth vam The been for the past three years? Junt who does protect the citizens of a.: az,- ,, s t, m ,-.i rur,aay

,.,,..m..,-.-"

g meem l - "< r= ~ "<

• it is common knowledge that More letters on A23

_ _g y_

l' - s ices - nutt gOrine ,ines,,

b ,, ,,

Y $$%%Wi5 h jh !f.L