ML20207A535

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Opposes Proposed Rule Change to Raise Tolerable Levels of Radioactive Emissions from Nuclear Power Plant & Further Reduction of Current 10-mile Evacuation Zone.Related Info Encl
ML20207A535
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 02/06/1987
From: Muirhead D, Ott M
CITIZENS URGING RESPONSIBLE ENERGY
To: Zech L
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20204J386 List:
References
FOIA-88-198 NUDOCS 8706250556
Download: ML20207A535 (36)
v • d • e


Text

February 6, 1987 Mr. Lando Zech, Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 N. H Street Washington, D.C., 20555

Dear Chairman Zech,

Citizens Urging Responsible Energy (CURE) is a grassroots, non-profit group organized in the summer of 1986 to address residents deepeaing concerns about safety issues regarding the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, which is located just 35 miles south of Boston. Our goal is to keep Pilgrim shutdovn until such time as the public is fully satisfied that it can be managed safely. Wd are n.gl anti-nuclear.

Our vork on this issue, involving meeting attendance, corres-pondence and research at the Local Public Document Room (LPDR) in Plymouth has caused us to arrive at some startling conclusions.

We have always perceived your role to be that of regulating the nuclear power industry in the interest of protecting public health and safety; however, evidence to date strongly suggests that it is the nuclear industry that you are protecting, and we the people that you are trying to regulate. It truly is a matter of growing public concern.

Nevspaper reports today say that you are considering dropping a l

requirement that evacuation plans be approved by the state before a nuclear power plant is licensed. This is clearly an expression of sympathy on your part for the financial hardship inposed on the Soabrook utility by the delay in their licensing. Where is your concern for the thousands of residents who are being asked to accept the hazard posed by a nuclear power plant in their midst without a workable evacuation plan?

CURE vould like to go on record in opposition to your proposed rule change to raise the tolerable levels of radioactive emissions from nuclear power plants.

CURE is opposed to any further reduction of the current 10 mile evacuation zone. We find it unconscionable that you have allowed Pilgrim. With its history of poor design, poor maintenance, and management to oper-ate for 14 years without a fully approved evacuation plan. Current review by our town study committee con-cludes that this plan is unworkable, inadecuate, and outdated. Yet a call to the Federal Emergency Manage-

  1. f*

Pago 2 I

ment Agency (FEMA) last week revealed that Boston Edison  !

may still legally restart with the present "interim appro- '

val" status. Surely the word interim implies temporary. ,

Fourteen years is not temporary. l l

CURE urges you to act favorably on the "show cause" petition which was filed by 50 Massachusetts legislators and interested citizens groups like ours to call for a i full public hearing to show why Boston Edison should be I allowed to continue to operate Pilgrim.

We are shocked that it has taken you i m_enths to extend the courtesy of an acknowledgment to the citizens who have de- i voted countless hours gathering evidence in support of their  !

concerns. Meanwhile, as State Senator William Golden has publicly stated, the NRC has been meeting with Boste- Edison in an apparent attempt to resolve the problems which ar'e, in {

fact, the very essence of this petition.

Finally, Chairman Zech, we are questioning your priorities.

In revieving the generic reports on nuclear power plants at our LPDR, it has become very apparent to us that the situation j ve are faced with here near America's hometown is unfortunately l not unique in this country. We have seen the names of the same dozen plants appearing in the Abnormal Occurrence Reports to Congress; the same documentation of records of non-compliance; submittal of false statements, degraded valves, pump failures, pipe cracking, and interestingly enough, a high percentage of i these plants have GE BAIX 1 boiler vater reactors.

' Surely at the rate things are going, it is only a matter of time before there vill be a major accident somewhere; and it Will be little solace for this country, and the world, to l 1 earn that the NRC had documented the pattern of problems for

) years and repeated 1v fined the offenders.

When Region I NRC Administrator, Thomas Murley, testified at the State Joint Committee on Energy hearing on Dec. 17, 1986, he sali that the NRC was a "tough regulator". We challenge you to prw.e that by forcing Boston Edison to undergo the scrutiny

! of a public investigation. ,

i We look forward to your response.

/

Sincerely yours, I

i j Mary C. Ott q Donald M. Muirhead, Jr., M.D.

Co-Chairmen, Duxbury Citizens Urging Responsible Energy 1

i I

L ._ . . - - -

T.r/1 *

\

,l Y  :

@ m F i-

's!5 'j !, l< d 2

ss> p$5 e n N 4 pd " <

il" nti ta, is sb s.

o 1 x.

n O (S~ QG O

+k L

^

r f!,*&

i

@ @ Ek *: + "o l !l

sg ** y 8

> @ Sg e s ' 5e h 5 N j!

  • 1 11 !i o _
g. l __

. a , e n ,,

Id "

5 Is 7 -n c d $g 1,

ij

. 2 2.{ sa le r

s ,1  ! o Ec i< a

< a 2 -p 3 5 '!

'5 A r , y -  ; --

~ # r5 > 0 3  !! li g E m lg c

'l' I l il Jl p .

di gd a 3 , -

ggf _f .......

l _

!l ,

r a

.i,-

3 .

i 4 2 t0I ll, 3 i il !! il r __

m "i S

[7 3 .!/

fi !I !! il II O @$e l 'W 7 E jlll gju '05'i n lal,l'i w_

n: n n, ,o, yWn c e 2 -

a 33,  ; =S p e-J e- e 8 )o il - _

@ E " ~*

  • e '<En

~

j 31 E) G ': '

'j 2 2 I e 3 m@ E $$ 0 $ n. <.

E e l 11 3!  !!

l l

l l

1 i

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT - NUCLEAR EXECUTIVE ASSISTAl4T l G ; rcl (OUTAGE OVERSIGHT) l l L e dg : + +~ l \

l l t  !

I VP-NUCL ENG j )

& QUALITY _j l ASSURANCE Ho serc/ ,

NUCLEAR DIRECTOR NUCLEAR OPERATIONS PLANNING ENG DEPT MANAGER & RESTART MANAGER 19 ab s r + s S , j),.s p ; e Sevenson l

A ,

t

l l

I NUCLEAR OPERATIONS DEPT MANAGER Rober43

, , y.3 I I 1 i ,

4 ADMIN TECH OPS HP FP SEC y

PROCUREMENT l SUPPORT l

I ,

OUTAGE . TEST & TURNOVER MANAGER I OM3 ADOOM(S) TEST gg3 ,

j gros ee & T/0  :

1 l

1 i d

J .

1 PROJ COORD PROJ COORD STATION

CMG REFUEL. CME MAIN TuRs
& RPV & t.AYUP SERYlCES 1

I I

i I l

I l

l l i

l

! ,1 1

%)

i

DIRECTOR PLANNING & RESTART Gilles pit l I l WORK PLANNING & MATERIAL WORK PROGRESS ESTIMATING READINESS AUTHORIZATION BRANCH '

BRANCH BRANCH BRAN $

MAINT REQ &

- SEP MODS - ESTIM ATillG - EXPEDITING " OTHER SOURCES

_ OTHER - COST CONTROL ~ STAGING MODS WORK JOB PLANNING INTEGRATED

- APP R ~ & SCHEDULING - LOGISTICS - P RIOR'TIZ ATION T&WO - CL ASSIFIC ATION

- REFUELING E I A ING

- TRNGIOPS

~

- fcR isT

- CHECKLIST

- ROUTINE l

'N i i

l

)I.lc0 Y0N OT N,

NRC/8ECO INTERFACE ISSUES JUNE 29. 1987 MEETING A\1.

Determination of "backlog" items to be completed prior to S/U and the i criteria used to evaluate them as corpleted.

1 M2. - w - T * ** *

  • ig'P0 { A a .(6AdA d --
  • 6 j l Review of utility self-assessment of act,1vities (5/U, operations, , ,

maintenance. ...). hd cp Gy.lf NI # -

a k+dJY4 W w i u{"

h Review of E0Ps especially with regard to use of Rev. 4 of the GE W@*48 ~ [ b k O I' technical guidelines.

Q i n m ets-4 Review of facility changes to be made -- including containment pM ,g

\

modifica tions . Some require TS changes. Some may be done under 50.59.

' s s I, dss 5MN M StR[ ' '

Resolution of Appendix R for Appendiz A to BTP) issueE[W 5

6equ AT4 6+ T q l Se Mm D/' p

.. +

1 g #19. \_' M isuj ~ '

6.F Identification of NRC hold points during S/ nd power ascension.  ;

h'C D E '

I T w h,

7. Review BEco outline.

W YO M ~4 hW c et &

4

{

G $$ MbC SHJ d H (' ,

I i

A

% b

% d)  %. S j.u.Tb 1

I i

f

  • 4 8s4 vs - (ee / % s)? C~ heis dobus G c 6 6~

(L) RasT wu + c: m k ~ /-s k sh( 1  % E.J (n) nk ci s L (1s + sLg c n c)~ g

,+

(A)  % s hiz-i n , . u. k L .s

. t~s vpt k' sA-h (b hS <h, s$ e l' { he r70

~

a A MW . A/ N(' )

-(-

OtSc ~ %sT p co 4. y .

cpt:-

h $h W) 4 )

Wy s+ . , ~

Am A sw ~ T @

  • '-*'=b = - e-o e - e - gy ae.w -

(.e 4 0 s X_siQp.LQLkn -

Ee ?s R n u a_et o

. - ~ . _. - . .. __

8 888* a eN e=.m..u- -

_ amm-ew. .

k5[Z > h;u i~ $ 0 fG.r..).L. L%

y0 4 u ev w wk sag

h r

I 1

l l

HANDOUTS 1 I

for i

R. G. BIRD i

PRESENTATION i I

6/29/87 l 1

l l

1 l

l

[ NOTE: Separate Handouts for J. E. Howard Presentation)

g 8 1

n

/

N'6 i

k '

2 7

c ' 3 a ' 5 rx .

~

1

/

Ted

  • s

~

  • ~

n ~ 1

_ tI /

cn ~ 5 -

eo i 3 _

jt _ /a oa ._

4 -

rin  % -

Pma _

3 nn t -

_ / 1 -

ooc _

3

- ie t

3, 9 _.

g

- D j -

- a 9

  • g nde it -

h mig ,

3 ae t W _

7 2

0 1 n _

3

_ 2/

- o '-

c

_. 1 2

e /

- 2 D .- 81 g

~ j

~ 3 1

- 7

/

1

- 0 s1

- 0 0 0 ~ 1 0

2 0

8 0 0 /

1 6 1

0 4

0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 2

. c l

Controlled Area Contamination Status I Areas by Contamination Level l As .c s o-i s-se Cinen <115 44,1%

l Cont, alk <10k 25.2%

M Cont. 250k 21%

Cont. 210k <50k 9.8%

l Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Contamination Level as of L/18/87 Clean <1k 52.3%

- ^ Cont, 260k 2%

i-3 Cont. 210k <50k 1.9%

lL.  :

l

1. _-

Cont, alk <10k 43.7%

j . .

LICENSED REACTOR OPFRATOR COMPI FMENT l

25 - 26 20 -

19 15 -

14 12 .wwwwwwwwwwsmm www usu

: y: FEB 87 JUN 87 JUL 87 DEC57 AUG 88

/

l Assumptions: 1) 1 R.O. Leaves Operations Before June SF

2) 85% Pass R.O. Exam t[p' N s' e 3 (, .

3 y

3

3) 1 More R.O. Leaves Operations Before Aug. 88 @') g p. '

{

v'.? u^b

- EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION REPORT - PERFORMANCE MONITORING Maintenance Requests (MR's) 0 1600 -

1400 --

' 2" --

  • ' ' N .--- -..- .

1000--

-. o . 00 x. _

600 --

400 .

RFOs7 g,, -

1r ' '

0 Aug Sep Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr my 70N Jun Jul ..Oct 1986 1987 Maintenance Requests (MR's)

Greater Than 3 Months Old

  • 100% < -

90%-

80% -

70% - -.--------.

60% . .- .* N, SA<

m.

30% - -

N "

RFOe7 l* y .

0%  ; , , , . .

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov ooc Jan Feb Mar Apr Wy Jun 1986 1987

  • This quantity depicts the MR's with respect to the INPO definition (i.e.,

excludes preventive maintenance, technical specification surveillances, major modification work, etc.)

k INPO Industrial averaae

7. 1

,. _ _ _ . - , - _ , .__m- _.r- . - - . . , . . _ _ _ m - , , - - - - - -

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 300--

l i

250 . N.% ,_, ,

,N.~ ,

,N -

200 'e ,

150

\

100 N,/*'e~,

50--

0 '

1/28/87 2/13/87 2/25/87 3/9/87 3/23/87 4/6/87 5/15/87 6/15/87 115/87 1/14/87 6/15/87

j O

J PILGRIM RESTART PROGRAM -

f 'v; 5g4 !  !

  1. f TABLE OF CONTENTS b l gd I. Programmatic Management Improvements l A.  !

B. Significant organizational and personnel changes Increased staffing and support II. Specific Restart Prerequisites, Associated Actions and Acceptance Criteria for Resolution

  • l A. Plant Operations B. Radiological Controls C. Quality Assurance i D. Maintenance E. Surveillance  :

F. Fire Protection  :

G. Emergency Preparedness )

H. Security and Safeguards  ;

I. Outage Management, Modifications i Technical Support Activities i J. Licensing Activities K. Training and Qualification Effectiveness L. Engineering and Corporate Technical Support III.

Existing Processes for Documentation, Prioritization, and Items Timely and Effective Closure of Multiple Work A. Refueling Outage Work B. Maintenance Work C. QA audit / surveillance results D. General documents, Drioritization and i closure of other achm1 9 work items i IV. Processes to Ensure System Restoration, Operability, and Readiness A. Plant Operational Condition Change Checklists B. Systems Group

e I

V. New Initiatives for Program Improvement A. Work Control - Documentation, Prioritization, Planning, Scheduling, and Closure B. Maintenance Inprovement C. Radiological Control D. Development of long term permanent organization VI. Power Ascension Program, Holdpoints and Regulatory Approval l

l 1

l l

l 9

.--.n., , - , . - - - . - - - - - - . , - - - - - - - - . - .-- -

J Is HANDOUTS for l

J. E. HOWARD ,

l 1

PRESENTATION 6/29/87 1

e

.r/tr

w ,.... .

"t

- 5;. .-,-,

=

.- ~.

4 i

I I

j j . .

I BOSTON EDISON COMPANY i

i '

t i

1 a1 i

l SAFETY ENHANCEMENT: PROGRAM i

i I

i l

1 l

e e i

) .

4 J

RAEEIST :EEEAEHEPERT ERO_GER A O E T _@ E :E X E R N GBALE Near Term Goal:

Identify and implement Plant improvements Responsive to NRC Draft BWR Containment Policy.

Revise Emergency Operating Procedures and Train Operators to improve Operational Readiness and Ensure Effective Use of Plant Capabilities in the Event of an Accident.

Long Term Goal:

Perform a Comprehensive Safety Assessment Supported by Deterministic and Probabilistic.

Analyses of Severa Accidents to Ensure That:

1. The Pilgrim Specific Response to Severe Accidents is Well Understood
2. These insights are Effectively Used Within Boston Edison to Reduce the Pr'o bability and Consequences of a Core Damage Accident
3. These insights are Available in Support of Emergency Preparedness Planning

\ _ .__ _____ - __ ________ ______ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _

.r ..

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM -

Proeram Elements Safety Analyses- Both Probabilistic And Deterministic Plant Equipment Modifications Oper:tions ProcedureImprovements Training Management System Impmvements

....sLah

'I i

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

. A_gprottch

)

i Integrate Conceptual Designs And Analytical Res i

Plant Modifications Pmcedures .

l' OperationalPractices Training Maintain Active Involvement In The Industry

' s Program Information Exchange Techr. ology Transfer l

t i

$$ E T 3 E EA E S 3 E E k . _j2[3O S1[$L N d@Bl!Il189 1

Station Blackout

  1. Plgqg Q Suppression Pool Vent To' Main Stack - Sized For Decay Heat e emovat kqM j

Fire Water Inter-Tle To RHR Additional Source Of RPV Make i

l improved Long Term Nitrogen Supply I

9 I

Set Point Changes To Extend The Duration Of RCIC Operation Addition Of A Third Diesel Generator

i l

a 1

kE$[.3 lEENM EEMSET 23963fd.

i 53_GRW118R Anticipated Transient Without Scram i

Enriched Boron For SBLC System '

9 TRAC G Analysis For ATWS Backup Recirc Pump Trip Automatic Depressurization System Logic Changes 4

8 Feedwater Pump Trip 1,

l

)

l l

I

1 l . .

l

~

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Reschs 1

Containment Performance i

l l

l -

Optimization Of Drywell Sprays Design Nozzle Change And Flow Reduction Fire Water Inter-Tie To RIIR - Additional Source Of Drywell Spray 4

Supression Pool Vent To Main Stack - Containment Overpressure Control j -

Improved Longterm Nitrogen Supply J

. SAFKfY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Summary Pilgrim Safety Enhancement Program Addrtsses Complex Severe Accident Issues Both From Prevention And Mitigation Standpoints

- Broad Technical Expertise Is Being Employed To Resolve Technical Issues

- Improvements Are he Resuk of De Most C-:: , "=n% Safety Analysis Since ne Issuance Of he Operating License .

- Improvements Are Investments In Safety Enhancing De Existing Plant Design And Operational Capabilities

- Continuing Benefits Expected By Identifying Additional Applications To Improve Management of Safety At PNPS h

I ub

' JUL 07 ' 87 loszd Nke MILLStuNt. 1 /)8 3

'. , / W" f-mosrw m,m t..a w ov<es

-4k V

I .

800 3:3 won street h v .* h sw e .seta m w gj fpl J June 30, 1987 \y / ')

Ralph 0, sird EPC# 87-356 L7 ku vice %s eer, s cwe I

Hr. Peter H. Agnes, Jr. I Assistant Secretary of Pubile Safety The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Oiiv AshbutLun Pldte j Room 2133 Boston, MA 02108

Dear Mr. Agnes:

I

- The attachments to this letter are Emergency Preparedness Materials developed recently by my staff based un our understanding of perceived weaknessesi)n offsite planning. He believe this information resolves the major conce gis '

being addressed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in their self-initiated review: Beach Population and Sheltering Hobility Impaired and Transportation Dependent Individuals, Special Facilities Planning and a Northern Reception Center.

He recommend that your agency send this information directly to FEMA for consideration during their se*f-initiated review. Prompt review of this inform 5 tion should preclude an unnecessary negative finding concerning offsite emergency planning for the protection of the health and safety of the general public around the Pilgrim Station, and in turn avoid creating unnecessary public concern.

He also recomend that the Hassachusetts Civil Defense Agency use this information to update the State's Emergency Plan and Procedures as well as those of the five towns within the ten mile Pilgrim Emergency Planning Zone.

He are preparad to assisc you in quickly achieving this objective.

~

JFC/cae Attachments Z/s%

'JUL 07 '87 16:24 NRC MILLSTONE 1 P03 l.

  • 1 cc: Messrs, Ronald Bellamy (with attachments) l Robert Boulay ( "

)

David Canepa ( )

Joseph Costa ( ) l Daniel Daly ( "

) i Richard Johnson ( )

Richard Krimm (w/o attachments )

H1111am Lazarus (with attachments)

Richard Lovin (

)

David Malaguti ( " )

David McLoughlin (w/o attachments ) l Thomas Rodgers (with attachments) 1 William T. Russell (

) l Al Slaney ( "

)  :

Edward Thomas ( )

Henry Vickers (

)

David Vogler ( "

)

I 1

l l

1 l

i 6 l

DIRECTOR PLANNING & RESTART 7/7/87 D.L. Gillisple

! P.E.T.

STAFF G. Mountain F. Hayden L Cyr N. Governal* D. Doeton j I I I I

'j WORK PLANNING & MATERIAL WORK PROGRESS ESTIMATING READINESS AUTHORIZATION l BRANCH BRANCH BRANCH & CONTROL l A. Marquardt D. Peoples D. Winoa BRANCH R. Mckay R. Anderson

  • R. Byrnes TRNGIOPS SEP MODS -EXPEDITING COST CONTROL G. Mountain R. Stefan J. Gianntonio CHECKLIST OTHER MODS STAGING JOB PLANNING - PRIORITIZATION R. cote A. smals

& SCHEDULING PROCEDURES APP R L Mcdonald INTEGRATED R. Velez*

-CLASSIFICATION D. Kauppinen l-ESTIMATING LOGISTICS MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT - APPROVAL

w. wililams J. Powell - SCOPING
c. Barnett TEST & T/O -ESTIMATING R. cot *

- ACTIVE WORK LIST

-MAT *L IDENT

~ I' *"

-MR'S & OTHER SOURCES

  • Assigned to Line ,

Organization Approved 14 +-#

r

.V

~gb}r]z .

i-Nuclesr Engineering R. N. Swanson (x8800) e Manager e

e Secretary Field l Engineering

  • Design Licensing
  • C. Minott (8803] Section & Analysis Section ,'

e R. Fairbank (x8804) i Section l

=

1

, R. E Grazio =

l (a rY.ff) l -

o l

=

1 Sise " *'*

  • Civil Control '

Power Nuclea r 8s- ..J Engineesing e Structural Systems ha Regulosory S*',*"*

g F

, NA Office e Componen8s "*'I*'* # "* I' * '

(vseleu s)

Group Gro#P "P GP G'oup Group Analyste

, , (NA) (NJ) (ND) (N4) *"P I e

C) (NL) g Project s P. Val 1ee (x843S) ""**8*'*

e (NM) d. :"._- ,O'.

q' .2 (( 1,5 ~ g%' ',7. D. *,.,. * " '",N '*a 8 77;~'

tr mm 1=- = . . . O 2 ,

e e-I1'.Y7 7.'.

O*- lO,'

tt"* ',= ' :: :_:,,,,,; g I ":: ,=l i::::: ,=' i. ,= => *  ::" ' =l..  : ;;,, ;=;

= :=j  :=  : =: .= :=. -=
"* = :+ == - -,

~l  : :::'. l=; .- <->

==.  : =:- =.  ;=.  ::  :=:  : =. :=: -

t= =. =~.= :f.::".:;

= =  :-  :=: u-

, ' '. t =' O.  ;=o P De~y-D. A. Bryant (x8802)

" ::;;** l=1

-e 8, t* -

, . R. Velez (xgg74) C, io .'3" b -

{ y b U~

Methods.

O. S. Mitney (x88]g) Training & _ _ Staff Compliance Assassants Engineer (NM)

("") G. M. McHugh (x8926) i E. detemos (x8873)

2E PRESIDENT NUCLEAR ENGINEERING & ad QUALITY ASSURANCE e ORGANIZATION Administrative Staff t1 Add vt) 6YMM k Nucioar Management Nuclear

{g& d *

. Quality DA -

Services Engineering i

, e Assurance i Department Department Departmont Cost Con'/of Ouality Engr.

, Grcup Group Proyect Control Audit Group Group i

i.

Records Mgmt. Oper. Quakty l _

j Group Control Group i

l i

i i

AL_ Jpectra Mn/- 4 LL. , * .

NUCl. liar ,

OPliRATIONS -

A1ANAGER

/ x

\

pevE qu osmal Neit- Gv=11ee Tab Se d \

h s ou)DErd x

\,

I OPERATIONS 51AINTIiNANCE TliCilNICAL '

SECllON RADIOLOGICAL h1ANAGEh1ENT \

SECHON SECllON SECllON SliRVICES hlANAGER -\

51ANAGER A1ANAGER (SRO & ORC Chairmar.) h1ANAGER l 41ANAGliR

\

\

51AINTENANCE OPERATIONS GROUP GROUP ONSITE SAFETY & RADIOLOGCAL TRAININQ GR UP i' PERFORh1ANCE Gnuip Lea v Chic f Iingineer Chief Engineer (ORC) OPERATIONS GROUP ,

GROUP

  • Staff '

(ORC) (SRO) . Staff Chief Engineer (ORL) '----- =---

g anh ----------------- Group Leader (ORC)

  • staff COh1PLI/ 'h'Ji -- ,

Enrincers (SRO) STATION SERVICES

  • Staff M'AGEMii l'C OUP .

Nucicar GROUP RADIOLOGICAL Group Le der

,'Peration' G.roup Leader ENGINEERING GROUI' .S 3 I8-Supervisors (SROi 3,3 rr T P 3 cr

~~-----s-

  • Nu(Icar Plant .IliCIINICAL RFSOUR TROHCHOh

'-

  • staff & COi IROLGROUP

, ot.craiors < RO>

... L..........-

CilEMICAI.

A1 ANAGEN 1ENT f

-, - - y y- - - ' GROUP .................

RADIOLOGICAL Group Leader

  • Staf r

Chief Engineer (ORC) --- -----------~~~ f GROUP GROUl* OPERATIONS Chief Engineer (ORC) G,roup Leader *siaff - -

- - - SUPPORTGROUP REGROUI PRO'lllCTION

, Svi/' Group Leadcr

  • Staf f , My{ *siaff iroup Leader
  • siaff -

y lloston Edison Campany I imEN - ' -

Orgatiization for Operation of Pilgrim I ORC - Member Operations Review Conunistee Figure 6.2.2 SRO - Senior Reactor Operator

, g , RO - Reactor Operator

Nuclear pgt Engineering gev--

Manager e

  • Secretary I e Licensing 36 e gt,'<

C,g Fleid o Des' " ~ & Analysis p.lAdyss^ -

Engineering 8 e tlon MisoT Section g . ,

Section e s

e e

E a

Civu Contros

" F**

  • Power Nuclear Regulatory 8 I 3,

' ',* ",*, conP[ f Site Englaeoring

, p a Structursi Systems ha Components SI* t**

  • A"*i I *t* Aff
  • i' *

. Group hhsle NMT g y, , Group Group *up Office a Group Group ' [ j ]

P (N4) (NL)

  • I I (NA) (NJ) (ND) B (verlous) C) i i i i i g
b. UfM ws u T a ng Staff

~~TbClu'a-Y 5'tS td b^ '

k ~ Isistants Co mpliance A

~3im

>%%" N (Ada Ktp3 E igineer (NM)

(NM)

-T 'M* .s4fe K ee.)

EPARTMENT ORGANIZATION CHART - NUCLEAR ENGif4EERING D

. . ,. 2, ss Eh[' [ so

, C-/**A8/ t Me suYaTesvo8mn hTc-

,, Ko h ld , , ,

t*k gy REV 9 EXHIBIT 1.01-A ,

459 w~

E&'s

i ClllEI - T. 2 -O w ,

, 47,p EXECLT11VE OH3CER #y

~

~ ~

  • cc/

SENIOR c.4 ) q VICF.PRESIDEfR j .ruel i

<3 g. ,

Lt.y,l t 5,3 Au . 3  ;' NUCLIV.R t,- '

7 -

NUCLI SAIETY t

____---m----

.,9 REVIE d AUDIT r ---,

l Co trrrEE .

s u .( i U '

/

r... G

  • A ct- T ,.t k _,.. i < \ 5 '

/.<. e. '

'"# , f -, i VICE PRESIDENT eb VCE PRTS'DFVT

  • T [ b .., <- NUCLEAR ENGINEERING , ,J J W&tdAcY- l MPCLEAR OPb2ATIONS ,'

& QUALITY ASSURANCE 1

  • f af" l,*

' , uy'

!, d l

-~

b-P'*Let - I I __ .

7 NUCLEAR I,UCLEAR - y.<tl OLTTAGE )J ta t i 8-T 0 QUALITY NUCLEAR Al- g WAG #N ^ .

ENGINEERING ASSURANCE .,ERVICES WO 7 -

8, a.~ . OPMABONS @ . l EN *

' (, :a.. .lur *

-b

,1, s 4 .I ri a y 3,. . -

.g,- ,, PLANT OPERATIONS REVIEW ---'

STAFF COMunRIE Iloston Edison Coinpany Organization for Operation of Pilgrim I Figure 6.2.1

- 209 -

i b i 4

,O O 7 A" /M l O d Iter lao rw%,2 O w 71 1.T o g'IVi, ts.e\e O . Cx. ..~b s, uw:. e  %

O r w tA 7 O

O o ,/is U.%, l a D u.t hy b O

'o O 75 LR.c,$ u ( 6 4610 ) 'I . L .\ f .47 o%

'o L a ,,+p r.# c,.4.o

a. 2, / . cx t u-io (n +4) Stq 9g3 o /ty O

E + M.3 -

)

O O

'O 7(s 2 3 ds Ti. ALL \

~

O '

O Te-.%r O

'O

i. s o t c. .)

.o 1 co+ ko W /

'O O t h .Go Is , l . Tutl <. r 6//fr7 lO o

4 . h e. La Ts.

9

.e Mo Lq, .'

l9 jD 7. w <, q, .35 p i% g, p ,y. ,yg g yut y4(

ben Y~ \ <. ,

,o jD -

!P 9

!p -

te Z/fV

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20207A535&oldid=3052705"