ML20055G334

Comments in Opposition of Nuclear Power Plant Going on-line Above 5% Power

ML20055G334
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	05/06/1990
From:	Fleming J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Blough A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20055G327	List: ML20055G326 ML20055G334
References
NUDOCS 9007230056
Download: ML20055G334 (2)

Text

yy ny*p p y" y' '

my, 3,

g, m

-m a

f mQ {

j

-p-7 T

i g

y 1-.

5 s

I ' y,,, i

--.y x,W xc

~

c o

o of 4-b$s 0 3 x

w 1

.a A

.h !

D' W

khh%92 M i

Qi S N ff; [ l/M

'li

,~

.e 1]

"[

b E&Nhf&,Y i

N

~

^

W' i

c

+.

e h [3@

N

'y

n m

>g-g m

h,u L, *+

M%

m.

yM ', %[ 'yMrJ ek.w Randy; tilough

. ~...

it '

'N

.UI S. lh 8. C L

'AJ seglonXI,

UA,_

Tingtof.2Prusola.Penn. _ 19406,i

'475 A j,l enda'l e l Road j*

~

^

~

Ag o

4*

4'

-MAY 6, 1990

~

c

+.

7 M

JearlA'.DRandy B1ough::

g,4.'

EThe Njk.CV s.l'athstLresponse:(Apr. 6,01990) to my-y t

W allegationfisylndeedJinadequate..1 was informed >that1the s

lN.H.C.3would' respond (toLthe technical aspectswof'_this J4llegat'lon while.the-I'.G.'s office _would. handle /the relatedL

+1

procedu'ralcaspectstrelative to-this allegatloni?TheLApr,6; 1990

responee.' notion 1y,.does not; address theKtechnica1.

aspects-ofLthe al.1eaat'lon,-but?.once again'makes the

- l a

1 r

s 4

' statement thatlleithe mainibasis of my allegation.-

iTheistateme'nts?;"The NRC has made its fIndino that lbt%.tLijslCAQDngh] e aeeuranGL Lhak AG1R9klat;tt _ prot,ect 1 ye >

~

iT)ttnjntres 7 earl nnd wi l l be taken in the event >of a LCAClLQl.QR.lHdliCMT_qtRGE.At PJ.inrJa ". odoes not appearmto.

dcomport' with'10-C.F.R.60':47(a)

As previously stated.this

, g 4 m

'seutton requirestthe N;R.C.4 to ~. base 'I ts f i ndi ngs on:!aErev iew, m j;

'of:1 FEMP s t 1 ndi ngs. ' Ata the nt imei thel N.R.C. a l,l owed ' P l;1 gr i m -

ci

t o"rancend above. 54 -power the - on! y' comp'l e ted! de termi nat lon; of FEMActs:lts_'1986 rejection:of Pl.lgr.im's Emergency Plans as-i Insdequate n CI'b le is the ; major + 1 ssue _I; expect the N.R.C.'to.

9 c

1 respond-to.;

fBeyond the major-issue'of what-did the N.R.C. base its' W

flhdings ofyreasonable1assuranceton, I expect youLto'.natisfy

eachESectionsof l0!C;F.R. 50:47 In which.I'ha've identitled'a.

"tj $

.probiem. I?wl11 Taga1n eticIosesa copy of myEFeb. 2 5, '1 9 9 0,:

syouiwillLfInd each--section clearlyTidentified.

Itvis the charge'of the N.R.C.

to. protect;the public healthiand safety'from nuclear accidents.yourttasks are:

clear 1y. det ined wi thln 10: C.F.R. 50:47. L As a member of (the d

1 pub'lIc I expect youLto readiIy be able to'identifyahow you.

j

~

_ y" haveJdetermined thatLmy faml.Iles health and safetyihas been.

i cprovided for orLadml.t: that in-your enthusiasm to return IN '

iPilgelm toLaLpower producing station you overlooked =some of-

'the necessary safety 1 precautions manda.ted.by law 11.have worked for-three years to help put' emergency; a

9 "pl'anning_ properly in place'in this area, and-I continue to j

work =toward this goal. Unti-1 this_ goal has been met, and I 1

1 chel:leve61t;can be met, Pilgrim 7should not be allowed to run l

g

, above 5% pov '. To achieve this goal the people of this area l

need the assistance and co-operation of the N.R.C. We do not 7

I

'need thp resistance,-avoldance and game playing we currently

(

are receiving from RegionI of the N.R.C. The unnecessary

-danger the N.H.C. has p1 aced my famiiy In is unconsclonable jp at'best and perhaps illegal. I strong ly urge you to, j

4 g

e.i m p 1 y, do your Job.

- 9do7230056 900713

! DR ADOCK 0500 3

3 W

y

e c T g W M g;n @ %

4 ;' "

w

.J

% s w

4,<

r

' ;> ? & " ~cQ--

m,,, A W*',:@.

1; ',

ggns

• g s, ygf%g{h-lA% CQ W hd%

4 :f-

.e

,s m.

'm i.

m fu

(, );L ] h

l 3 = 2 % nf

+ x.y 9

s

'e

?.

&x 0l;h i

m:::hd a.'f. %

. w s &

m..,

,t

~,.

n-m m

hyj fid v,Q; p.~

-a e,

-. + t,

&~

1 ~

7iy 4-cc

+

t M Y,% Fi t ;

/

D

a-y$;%

s-e r-F r

• Us; MglQ{; p + Q:

yq ot jW -'

\\

8 4:

s y

, 7; u W A.

,.:; l

':p% c=

_ = - -

~

i

<s

f

~

Y-

.s h

s s.:9p p.

.: +:t iu i...

bh fr N

[ilb b,

U b If

- y:4 u

i,

<x

~

n; e

,v

?

p 3@,

w ~m y g.

^

~3 '.'

jf'

<O

~

=

W,Jh rP ISs sonn s

i n

hat t eil G k N f$1'ce[h'asn

~

2 u_

FMM$

itake:Y3underlconsiderat lont m'y concerns 1s' tat led' fin:gthe j 9

ba -

'O fF.eb,28 m.1_990.7 Theref ore : a tHthI s t imell 'dod noti expecti youd tioR

%-,4 4

.;c.larilyTyour,aresponseltoTthatl matter..,,5 gJ

.~

4

&+Ng.

A

~

a gw.

'Agaln NITexpect:-a detailediresponsettoieachS!temTthat.

' +0 F

- 4 g@ R % j ; 21cnn6tilnEcompiiance:W1 thn 10 J:C. F.R ; 50 : 47ct' den t i f i ed);l nithe :

$y$'

IFebif 25,"1990 Ietter. 'l.f: youidisagreef 01 thimylf.1ndingsEI, 7@

@h'f' ' ' 4 expect @ deLla t 1ledjexp l anat ion why.c I fSyoutant'eef wi th' my, is

@g V *(indingsj: 1 expectAa detal. led outilrielof L the corrective:-

9 1

's g

act% nd

t'hs W.R.C'Lwl")litskei

Sin.cerely,,

i w,

W:a x ig.

-y m

f+ n?y r

's y

x gaa Jane AE Flem'ings

+

g

1. gwm j..

%p9%,, pg _ j

.a c k O

Mi

ce'

,]

T

~

Nha'lrman TennetM Capr-

+

f}$4 ~11 Illiv 1 dlN L 1 I)l amd]I nspector? General z y

.a..

m a PE

$ecr

etary' Samue1NChl:l k-t

,.E M. / 4 - D

~

r

-4

['

I "5

'('

+

r. - ~

v

'fJM N'

. JonW. 3. Johnson

.$. 4 m-a e Mm N+

WIIIlamzRuuseI1-

.LM

, m}

s., y eM i

^kh,.ygg'pdpM, gggggdy, u

a j

b. //

L-..

yd-a:

f{:U

+

-;\\

y::,

x py,

s

, m

.~q pt 4

t

,\\).'

y 4

- g;p'n M.

+ +

,~

L :f,Q

i.

E gya, ~

?..y 1i 4

>. 7

?

w U

s2 awm s

y g

g, y

_.q I ' i-d')

jj,

+

ME

~

m Y

o w

~

m.',

'p.

k q ?'i,, I

'k"4 \\

\\[

N i

.g, S.y 7. t mA re c-i

>na r--

.1 4.

4b r

r v

41 ~ { f t.

{l y_

y My'f,1 1,

-3

- n o

l[ $

) Yh ^.

k z

xcog

=,

M('] 3 '

<f ny

= MA

% n '.

g e

.' E4 ;

'.4 [

h 4

e

\\

h

>L u.-

~

^

L 9

A e

V s

4

.' fI n

s

..s.i

-')i!4 g_ '

.e i

W h ' "_ l ' ; [ '

t' g

'{'

jt s

.