ML19338B959

Reviews Mm Cherry 730326 Ltr to as Rosenthal.Fact,Document & Ref Request Has Been Used to Present New,Untimely, Unjustified & Unsupported Contentions.Cpc Will Comply W/Aslap Directives Re 730326 Ltr.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19338B959
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	04/09/1973
From:	Reis H LOWENSTEIN, NEWMAN, REIS, AXELRAD & TOLL
To:	Buck J, Parler W, Rosenthal A NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
NUDOCS 8007291084
Download: ML19338B959 (5)

Text

,

, , .. _ __- _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

-

b- ' ~

.

i

.I Law Cr0CES L N mot A.x. R ct s & Axn r. nan

' HOO CONNECTICUT AV E NQ C, N, W WASHIN GTON. D. C 20036 fj.t.. tam.. 202 296=7SSS

...n,.c.'

......e .. s....

. ~ r... . .. . .. .m c a . s ..

April 9,-1973-

.v Alan S. Rosenthal,i Esq. , Chairman

.

Dr. John H. _ Buck,. Member william C. Parler, Esq. , Member

' Atomic. Safety & Licensing-Appeal Board- _ .

U.' S. Atouic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. .

20545 -

Re: Consumers Power Company Midland Docket Nos. Plants %ts 1 50-329,, and 2 50-330 ,

v Gentlemen:

~

This ' refers to the letter to Chairman. Rosenthal, dated March 26,?1973, from Myron M. Cherry, Esq. . counsel for thetSaginawiIntervenors in this proceeding. - In that

-letter, Mr. Cherry purports to supply _information- which Dr. Buck requested' of._ him in the course of oral ' argument before the Appeal Board-on March 14, 1973.. (AB Tr. 58-60)

It- will be' recalled - that it .was made clear that what was

~

-being requested.of Mr. Cherry was " facts or documents"., -

" transcript ; references . and documents . . . and that is ' all, not' argumentation . . ..;"_ and that the Board would not

.

consider anything supplied by Mr. Cherry outside the record withoutlgiving other parties an opportunity "to address

' that material" . ( AB Tr. ;113) - ~ In the light of these-limi-

~

tations = and- the actual contents of the 1etter of March 26, 1973, zwe believe that' brief comment - by counsel ' for the

- Applicant'in this; proceeding is. appropriate.

Under . the heading " Question No. l" , the March 26 letter discusses Dr." Buck's request relating to information

'which the Saginaw Intervenors claimed to have . acquired-

,

~ "sometime ' in the summer of ~ 1972, prior to the ' conclusion

.of the hear ng, i and pr ori toct e- hn t ai i i l' decision of this

,

"

' c as e ' . - _ . .s.

'"

( AB Tr.r58; = =see . also , ~ Saginaw Escernion II .F. ,

p. 25) .Dr.; Buck stated:

"There is 'no reference - given;as - to what this-

~

~

,

information 'is or where it -is.< ;Can you en-

.

.

-

, lighten : us i on that , please?."- :(AB Tr.7 59) s f n

.

1 480on9fdf.

O , .t . i ' _L ' c2.m .J.. _. ,

-

.

_ _ . .

"

.

NewxAx Rzm & Axzt.nio'

' Alan ~S.LRosenthal, Esq.

Dr.-John H. Buck April 9,11973

. William C. : Parler, -Esq. lPage 2 i

He also asked- Mr. ' Cherry whether- he has "a topical reference

?to that?" (Ibid) .

- Mr.1 Cherry state'd .that the information "comes from rgf activities - in- Bethesda ' at the ECCS Hearings. " However, he. stated that he does "not have a document reference . . ., "

but that- he would "make some effort this week to try to docu-ment that' . . - . . " (Ibid) He also indicated that "Mr. Ford may . . . " have such a document in his; possession. (AB Tr. 60)

- In his March 26 letter, Mr. Cherry admits that: "We have searched our records and cannot find any documentation."

This - should end' the matter, particularly in light. of the Board's clear statement 'that it wished only "fects,""trans-cript references . and documents" and "not argumentation. "

-(AB Tr. 113) Nevertheless, on the -basis of his own representa-tion' of ' the truth ~ of the statements he cannot document, Mr. Cherry now requests that 'this ; Appeal Board order Mr. Kartalia to "re-

."

.

-spond to this issue . ..

In effect, this is a- request for ' discovery and argu-mentation in support of'the' request. The discovery is requested

.with respect to matters:which were within the knowledge of .the Saginaw Intervenors or their counsel-well before the termination of theLHearing below. (See.Brieflof Applicant, Consumers-Power Company, .in Opposition to Exceptions Filed by the Saginaw Vall'ey ,

~ Intervenors ,. p. 29. n . 12; see also AEC -Regulatory staff's j Brief in Oppositiori to ' Exceptions of Saginaw- Intervenors, p.19,

'

n. 40.) The contention and the request should therefore be ignor'ed.

I The materials. referred to.in the March 26,.1973, letter '

under the headings " Question No. 2"' and " Question No. 3" osten-sibly:rulate-to record references. During-the' oral argument

' Dr. Buck noted "that .a reference ' to p. 2624-25 of the hearing I

~ transcriptncontained on p. 53-25.of the Saginaw Exceptions H "is obviously an incorrect ~ reference. . . . " and requested "the j correct one"=(AB.Tr.s 58) . Dr. Buck . also noted that a reference l

'

containedLon p;.53-24 of the Saginaw Exceptions was to "a-mix'd e

~ bag of? cross-examination". consisting of more than 300 pages.-

~He stated "I would 'like to know what -it is in those 300. odd pages? that you are' referring to." ' L (Ibid)  ;

1 An examination of the references and editorial- comment d

'c -. contained under the headings :" Question No. 2" and " Question 4 JNo'.D3" in?the March' 26 -letter makes it clear' that f ar more than l

( ,'i .

t

,u h

O -

-

'

~

4 _ _

~

..

-. _

,.

NewMAN; Rere & Axcudo

. k

- Alan.S. Rosenthal,.Esq.

Dr.-John H.1 Buck:

~

'

. April 9, 1973 William C. : Parler, Esq.

-

Page 3

" facts or, documents" or " references.and documents" have been

~

supplied. Thus',- with respect to " Question No. 3" the March 26 ,

-letter lists -12. " areas _ succinctly", labelled A through L.

Each makes a: contention of alleged " fact" or refers to an

- admission and cites allegedly-supporting-hearing transcript

- references.

However, the reference in the originally filed Saginaw Exceptions to :"a mixed bag of cross-examination" reported in over 300. pages of the transcript -was . a clear violation of the provision - of 10 CFR 2.762 (a) which requires that exceptions "shall- specify precisely the portions of .the record relied

' upon . . . ." It was,- of course, Jmore than a technical viola--

tion', for the Saginaw Exceptions did not refer to the allegations of " fact" subsequently made 'in ' items A through L, and, therefore, a reply; to those allegations was impossible. Had the allegations of. fact" now contained in the March 26 letter been included in

. - the originally filed- Saginaw Exceptions, the Applicant's Brief

-in Opposition would have treated -them expressly and in detail.

- In this context we believe the items -labelled A' through L in

- the March 26 letter constitute either a supplement to Saginaw's '

original exceptions-or contentions in support of wholly new exceptions.. 'No good cause has been shown for filing such new or _ supplemental exceptions at this late date. Accordingly, we

. assume they will not.be considered by this Board.

, .Nevertheless,.the opportunity to supply " facts",

" documents" and " references" has-been seized _upon to make new,

- untimely,_' unjustified and unsupported contentions. We therefore-

-believe we are at least entitled to point out that our failure to _ reply in detaili does not constitute an admission of the accuracy of any,of the " facts" alleged. To the contrary, each

- of the listed-items"contains either argumentation, editon. liza-tionf or a statement -oficonclusion not supported by the cited transcript references"or which stretch the facts contained in

~

those references l(the material cited.under the heading

" Question 1No. 2" also f alls' within this'_ category) - or which

.

are outiof context-_'orl wh_ich ignore axplanatory. or -quz.12.fying -

material elsewhere inithe record .or. which appear to be refer-ences to materialinot of record at all. Many 'of- the items

contain two' or more of1 the foregoing characteristics.

?IfLthis Board desires the parties further'to address themselves'toLany of the material contained in the March 26,

-

h c

,

2

,.

. - - - _ _

,

t.;- . .o

,

b L NewxAxiReis & Axst.nin -

'

.. ..

-- Alart:S .f Rosenthal, Esq . -

1Dr. -' John H.- Buck. April 9, 1973

.-

- William C... Parler, Esq..

.

Page 4

,

'

1973', letter, the Applicant will, of~cours'e,' comply with any

_

l- . direction to that effect.-

!

l -Sincerely, I.

-

' NEE 4AN , REIS & AXELRAD L-jl 1 p A '

By Nf6'0Id.v eI [20%-

l. Harold F. Reis l:

I

Counsel- for Applicant, i Consumers Power Company

_

4 I

r a

?

t

-

l I-l

,

i i

I

-i I

.

f

> w

, ,

,, . . . , c. - . .- - . .- .

x'w

'

' ' ' -

-

,

-

s. ,  ;

• ':" : '43 ""

"

-

3: , <

e ,

-

,. , s ,4 ,

,

. -

, "s , .

,

[ A.

~

'

[ UNITED STASES'OFfAMERICA

'~

.'1 -

-

' ATOMICL ENERGY COMMISSION -

. . _ .

A

,

p

, ,' 5

' tin.the,Matterjof;

.,

- . . ,

,.

.

):

-

.

'

. . .. ..

).

CONSUMERS POWER 4 COMPANY. ') Docket Nos.-50-329 and.50-330:

-

. : :t L):

'(Midland b lant, Unitsil-and 2).

..

b )

'

' CERTIFICATE OF ~ SERVICE:

, , _

-

"

"Ii hereby certidyLthatecopies "of' the attached letter, dated April 9,-

'1973,-fin the cabove-captioned matter, have been= served on the -

h<

'

following ini person f or by deposit in the : United States mail ~ n, first-

~

s class: or ~airnail, ' this - 9th ' day ,of April, 1973.

'

' Alan S.;Rosenthal,'Esq.,7 Chairman . David E. ~ Kartalia,: Esq.

-

~ Atomic'LSafetyEand Licensing ;U.-S." Atomic Energy' Commission' q Appeal, Board" _

.W ashington, D.~C.- 20545 U. - S. : Atomic : Energy . Commission Washington, . D... C. :20545, JMilton R. Wessel, Esq.

P .-Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays

, ~ .

. _ . _

_

Dr.! John H.. Buck,-Member:~ and Handler Atomic' Safety .and Licensing _ 425. Park Avenue' 1 1

3 Appeal Board: New: York, New York 10022

"U. S / Atomic Energy: Commission

'

Washington,, D.' C.. ~20545' James N. O'Connor,.Esq.-

p _ _. . , .

.

The-Dow Chemical; Company.-

-

William.C. Parler,1Esq., Member 2030'Dow Center

'

Atomic; Safety,and Licensing '

' Midland, Michigan 48640 -

,

Appeal) Board ..

U. S. At(omic Energy. Commission; Myron M.' Cherry, Esq. ~(2)

-

20545

~

,

. Washington,?DL C.- One-IBM. Plaza '

Chicago, Illinois 60611 William . J. Ginster, ' Esq . -

' '

l '

"

Suite-:4,'Merrill Building

-

-

Saginaw, Michigan?:48602 Irving;Like, Esq.

, . Reilly, Like and Schneider CMr.-Frank W.iKaras (20)' 200. West Main

-Chief,? Public Proceedings Branch ' Babylon, New York 11702 officeoof the:S.ecretary of the. ~'

Commission -- Hon'. William H. Ward'-

.Uh-S., Atomic? Energy! Commission- Assistant' Attorney' General

• ' Washington,1D.fC.. 20545-

~

State'of, Kansas

, _

Topeka,- Kansas ' 66612

-

James 3A.[Kendall,(Esq..' l 135~ Ha Saginaw Road . '.

-

- Howard-J. Vogel,'Esq. -l

{, Midland,jMichigan)--48640. '

Knittle'&-Vogel .l e~' 814 Flo'ur' Exchange Building .

. )

(JuddIL.sBacon',' ; Esq.1, '

~

_

Minneapolis,' Minnesota: 1.55415' <

2<

LConsumersiPoweriCompanyz

-

=212iWest'MichiganxAvenue -I

,m

. ~

' Jackson,1 Michigan?14920lt .b'.. }' M .M y-. l

,7

- s

} Ri'chardM. (S'mith , )Esq .; ' ' . Harold F...Reis

'

j^ ;Smithj &?Brooker ? P .C. - .

cy )730]Washingt'on EAven'us yg g .

(Bay / City,jMichiganj f.487061 ^ -

'

c

-

~

'? J