ML20207F119: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20207F119
| number = ML20207F119
| issue date = 08/21/1986
| issue date = 08/21/1986
| title = Informs That 860219 Proposed Mod to Instrusion Detection Sys Satisfactory.License Condition 9.4 of Amend SG-1 to License SNM-368 Revised Per Attachments a & B of 860219 Ltr
| title = Informs That 860219 Proposed Mod to Instrusion Detection Sys Satisfactory.License Condition 9.4 of Amend SG-1 to License SNM-368 Revised Per Attachments a & B of
| author name = Brown W
| author name = Brown W
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Line 24: Line 24:
This is in response to your letter and attachments dated February 19, 1986, in which you presented a proposed modification to an element of your security system. We have reviewed the proposed system, find it satisfactory, and urge you to proceed with its implementation in a manner consistent with the time requirements outlined in the attachment to your letter.
This is in response to your letter and attachments dated February 19, 1986, in which you presented a proposed modification to an element of your security system. We have reviewed the proposed system, find it satisfactory, and urge you to proceed with its implementation in a manner consistent with the time requirements outlined in the attachment to your letter.
It should be noted that the. requirement of existing License Condition 9.4 has been satisfied, and that the wording of that condition requires that it be revised upon the NRC's approval of your proposed modification. The revised wording of Condition 9.4 was discussed with Mr. T. Collopy of your staff, and was found to be mutually acceptable. Accordingly, we are hereby revising License Condition 9.4 of Safeguards Amendment SG-1 to your license No. SNM-368, effective immediately, to read as follows:
It should be noted that the. requirement of existing License Condition 9.4 has been satisfied, and that the wording of that condition requires that it be revised upon the NRC's approval of your proposed modification. The revised wording of Condition 9.4 was discussed with Mr. T. Collopy of your staff, and was found to be mutually acceptable. Accordingly, we are hereby revising License Condition 9.4 of Safeguards Amendment SG-1 to your license No. SNM-368, effective immediately, to read as follows:
9.4 The licensee shall install the replaceme.            " intrusion detection alarm system" for the perimeter of the protected area (PA), as described in Attachments A and B of his February 19, 1986 letter.
9.4 The licensee shall install the replaceme.            " intrusion detection alarm system" for the perimeter of the protected area (PA), as described in Attachments A and B of his {{letter dated|date=February 19, 1986|text=February 19, 1986 letter}}.
The procurement, installation and implementation schedule for such replacement system shall be in accordance with item 2 of Attachment A of that letter, except that the first five dates appearing in said schedule (i.e., item 2 of Attachment A) shall be extended by 150 days. Until such time that the replacement alarm system is operational, the licensee shall provide all of the measures set forth in Supplemental License Condition 9.4.A (as previously issued).
The procurement, installation and implementation schedule for such replacement system shall be in accordance with item 2 of Attachment A of that letter, except that the first five dates appearing in said schedule (i.e., item 2 of Attachment A) shall be extended by 150 days. Until such time that the replacement alarm system is operational, the licensee shall provide all of the measures set forth in Supplemental License Condition 9.4.A (as previously issued).
Since Attachment A, and Attachment B when combined with Attachment A, of your February 19, 1986 letter contain classified (CONFIDENTIAL) National Security Information, they will be withheld from public disclosure.
Since Attachment A, and Attachment B when combined with Attachment A, of your {{letter dated|date=February 19, 1986|text=February 19, 1986 letter}} contain classified (CONFIDENTIAL) National Security Information, they will be withheld from public disclosure.
Sincerely, Willard B. Brown, Chief 8701050453 860821                      Safeguards Material Licensing and
Sincerely, Willard B. Brown, Chief 8701050453 860821                      Safeguards Material Licensing and
{DR ADOCK 07000371                        International Activities Branch PDR                Division of Safeguards, NMSS
{DR ADOCK 07000371                        International Activities Branch PDR                Division of Safeguards, NMSS
__. .-. --      -    . _ . .}}
__. .-. --      -    . _ . .}}

Latest revision as of 22:41, 5 December 2021

Informs That 860219 Proposed Mod to Instrusion Detection Sys Satisfactory.License Condition 9.4 of Amend SG-1 to License SNM-368 Revised Per Attachments a & B of
ML20207F119
Person / Time
Site: 07000371
Issue date: 08/21/1986
From: Brown W
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Kaufman N
UNC, INC. (FORMERLY UNC RESOURCES, INC.)
References
NUDOCS 8701050453
Download: ML20207F119 (1)
v • d • e


Text

(("%

s p,

4y UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

s . ',,,

SGMI:DRJ-86/32 DESIGNATED ORIGINAL 70-371 AUG 211986 UNC Naval Products Division of UNC Resources, Inc.

ATTN: Mr. N. C. Kaufman President and General Manager 67 Sandy Desert Road Uncasville, Connecticut 06382 Gentlemen:

This is in response to your letter and attachments dated February 19, 1986, in which you presented a proposed modification to an element of your security system. We have reviewed the proposed system, find it satisfactory, and urge you to proceed with its implementation in a manner consistent with the time requirements outlined in the attachment to your letter.

It should be noted that the. requirement of existing License Condition 9.4 has been satisfied, and that the wording of that condition requires that it be revised upon the NRC's approval of your proposed modification. The revised wording of Condition 9.4 was discussed with Mr. T. Collopy of your staff, and was found to be mutually acceptable. Accordingly, we are hereby revising License Condition 9.4 of Safeguards Amendment SG-1 to your license No. SNM-368, effective immediately, to read as follows:

9.4 The licensee shall install the replaceme. " intrusion detection alarm system" for the perimeter of the protected area (PA), as described in Attachments A and B of his February 19, 1986 letter.

The procurement, installation and implementation schedule for such replacement system shall be in accordance with item 2 of Attachment A of that letter, except that the first five dates appearing in said schedule (i.e., item 2 of Attachment A) shall be extended by 150 days. Until such time that the replacement alarm system is operational, the licensee shall provide all of the measures set forth in Supplemental License Condition 9.4.A (as previously issued).

Since Attachment A, and Attachment B when combined with Attachment A, of your February 19, 1986 letter contain classified (CONFIDENTIAL) National Security Information, they will be withheld from public disclosure.

Sincerely, Willard B. Brown, Chief 8701050453 860821 Safeguards Material Licensing and

{DR ADOCK 07000371 International Activities Branch PDR Division of Safeguards, NMSS

__. .-. -- - . _ . .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20207F119&oldid=3320868"