ML20100F080: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 32: Line 32:


Attached are two documents intended to support your review of the Toledo Edison Procedure Generation Package. This information was requested by.
Attached are two documents intended to support your review of the Toledo Edison Procedure Generation Package. This information was requested by.
your letter dated August 8, 1984 (Log No. 1570), on the subject.of Proce-dures Generation Package (PGP) - Emergency Operation Guidelines.
your {{letter dated|date=August 8, 1984|text=letter dated August 8, 1984}} (Log No. 1570), on the subject.of Proce-dures Generation Package (PGP) - Emergency Operation Guidelines.
Attachment I'is a comparison document identifying and justifying safety significant differences between the Davis-Besse Abnormal Transient. Opera-ting Guidelines (ATOG) and the Oconee 3 Guidelines which were previously reviewed by the staff. Babcock and Wilcox prepared this docu-ent because of their specific involvement in the creation of both sets of guidelines.
Attachment I'is a comparison document identifying and justifying safety significant differences between the Davis-Besse Abnormal Transient. Opera-ting Guidelines (ATOG) and the Oconee 3 Guidelines which were previously reviewed by the staff. Babcock and Wilcox prepared this docu-ent because of their specific involvement in the creation of both sets of guidelines.
Attachment II is a document prepared by Toledo Edison which identifies and justifies safety significant differences between the Davis-Besse ATOG and the Emergency Operating Procedures that were developed from those guide-lines. The differences identified in this second attachment are the re-sult of minor. inaccuracies in the plant specific detail of the Davis-Besse ATOG,. additions to the scope of some portions of the Emergency Operating Procedures, input from the review of the Oconee 3 ATOG by the_NRC, and additional experience from B&W Owners Group activity subsequent to the issuance of the Davis-Besse ATOG.
Attachment II is a document prepared by Toledo Edison which identifies and justifies safety significant differences between the Davis-Besse ATOG and the Emergency Operating Procedures that were developed from those guide-lines. The differences identified in this second attachment are the re-sult of minor. inaccuracies in the plant specific detail of the Davis-Besse ATOG,. additions to the scope of some portions of the Emergency Operating Procedures, input from the review of the Oconee 3 ATOG by the_NRC, and additional experience from B&W Owners Group activity subsequent to the issuance of the Davis-Besse ATOG.

Latest revision as of 05:12, 24 September 2022

Forwards Abnormal Transient Operating Guidelines (Atog) Comparison of Davis-Besse Unit 1 to Oconee Unit 3 & Comparison of Davis-Besse Abnormal Transient Operator Guidelines & Emergency Operating Procedure EP 1202.01
ML20100F080
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse, Oconee, 05000000
Issue date: 11/30/1984
From: Crouse R
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20100F087 List:
References
NUDOCS 8412060452
Download: ML20100F080 (1)


Text

-

(- -

h 4

Docket No.,50-346i yotsoo

%mus EDISON

, License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1106 NY"

%c e

"' S' 858 'd8 '

November 30, 1984 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

~ Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz Operating Reactor Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission +

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Stolz:

Attached are two documents intended to support your review of the Toledo Edison Procedure Generation Package. This information was requested by.

your letter dated August 8, 1984 (Log No. 1570), on the subject.of Proce-dures Generation Package (PGP) - Emergency Operation Guidelines.

Attachment I'is a comparison document identifying and justifying safety significant differences between the Davis-Besse Abnormal Transient. Opera-ting Guidelines (ATOG) and the Oconee 3 Guidelines which were previously reviewed by the staff. Babcock and Wilcox prepared this docu-ent because of their specific involvement in the creation of both sets of guidelines.

Attachment II is a document prepared by Toledo Edison which identifies and justifies safety significant differences between the Davis-Besse ATOG and the Emergency Operating Procedures that were developed from those guide-lines. The differences identified in this second attachment are the re-sult of minor. inaccuracies in the plant specific detail of the Davis-Besse ATOG,. additions to the scope of some portions of the Emergency Operating Procedures, input from the review of the Oconee 3 ATOG by the_NRC, and additional experience from B&W Owners Group activity subsequent to the issuance of the Davis-Besse ATOG.

Together, these two documents explain the safety significant differences (and many non-safety significant differences) between the Oconee 3 Guide-

' lines which have been reviewed by your staff and the Emergency Operating "rocedures that have been implemented at Davis-Besse.

~Very truly yours, 8412060452 841130 PDR ADOCK 05000346 fhw F PDR I

RPC:JRL:bec/nif encl.. I J cc: DB-1 NRC Resident Inspector )

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDO OHIO 43652

_