IR 05000250/1986016

Mgt Meeting Repts 50-250/86-16 & 50-251/86-16 on 860226. Major Areas Discussed:Select Sys Review Program & Milestones.Slide Presentation Encl

ML20210G620
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	03/18/1986
From:	Elrod S, Guenther S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20210G603	List: IR 05000250/1986016 ML20210G598
References
50-250-86-16-MM, 50-251-86-16, NUDOCS 8604020558
Download: ML20210G620 (32)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ . . _ . . _ . _ _

.  .

UNITED STATES

' [ A Kffo  o  NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 11
["  p 101 MARIETTA STREET, g  j
*i  *  ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30323
\. . . ./
   ~

Report Nos.: 50-250/86-16 ar.d 50-251/86-16 Licensee: Florida Power and LightL Company 9250 West Flagler Street '

  . Miami, FL 33102 Docket Nos.:  50-250~and 50-251  License Nos.: DPR-31 and DPR-41 Facility Name: Turkey Point 3 and 4 Meeting Conductedi  February 2h , 1986 Inspector:   - %

S. Guent e , Project Inspector Date Signed Approved by: , M-

 '

tephen A.~ Elfoci, Section ,)ief Date Signed Division of Reactor Projeds SUMMARY Scope: On February 26, 1986, representatives of Florida Power and Light Company met with NRC Region II personnel in Atlanta, Georgia to discuss the ~ Turkey Point Select System Review Program and Milestones. The theeting was held at the NRC's request to determine the status of safety system operability at the Turkey Point Facilit Results: -Florida Power and Light Company assured the NRC that select safety system operability had been confirmed as described in paragraph Phases 1 and 2 of the Select System Review Program were described as outlined in the Attachment to this repor l PDR ADOCM 05000250 I G PDR

n,

. .

-

', .

MEETING DETAILS Licensee Attendees J.-W. Dickey, Vice President, Nuclear Operations C. M. Wethy, Site Vice President, Turkey Point D. A. Chaney, Section Supervisor, Licensing E. Preast, -Site Engineering Manager, Turkey Point D. W..Haase, Chairman, Safety Engineering Group J. Arias, Jr., Regulation and Compliance Supervisor J. L. Parker, Manager, Construction Quality Control J. A. Labarraque, Performance Enhancement Program Manager G. P. Nutwell, Project Engineering Manager, Bechtel NRC Attendees R. D. Walker, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP) A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)

'G. R. Jenkins, Director, Enforcement and Investigations Coordination Staff V. W. Panciera, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 2, DRP C. A. Julian, Chief, Operations Branch, DRS D. G. Mcdonald, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation S. A. Elrod, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2C L. J. Callan, Chief, Performance Appraisal Section B. T. Debs, Acting Chief, Operations Section, DRS T. A. Peebles, Senior Resident Inspector D. R. Brewer, Resident Inspector L. P. Modenos, Enforcement Specialist S.~ Guenther, Project Inspector
 ~ Introduction / Action to Date The licensee's progress ~ report on the Select Systems Reviev Program is outlined on page 3 of the attached meeting agend Phase 1 of the review has been completed and the licensee has -concluded that the systems in question are operable. These operability determinations were based upon satisfactory completion of the following:
(1) A walkdown of each of the selected systems, including required support systems, by knowledgeable personne The walkdowns verified that the physical status and configuration of components met operability requirements and commitment (2) A review of .the surveillance procedures and test results associated with selected major components to ensure that operability was adequately demonstrate _ -_

. .
~
.

,

 (3) A review of operating, off-normal, and ' emergency operating i

' procedures associated with each listed system and selected support systems to determine the adequacy of these procedures considering-the. current plant design and operating method (4) A review of the maintenance history for a sample of these systems and selected support systems to determine repetitive failures and trends which could impact operability. Current backlogged plant work orders were reviewed to determine their potential effect on

operabilit (5) A review of the environmental qualification (EQ) for the systems,

[  subsystems, and individual _ components including instrumentation,

,

,  valves, power supplies, and lubrication as applicabl (6) A review and strengthening of management control over activities related to these selected systems'and support system The licensee representatives were not prepared-to discuss the specific details of what had been reviewed for each of the selected systems and were unable to satisfy the NRC that the Phase I system operability review criteria had been met. The' licensee agreed to provide the NRC by March 14, 1986, with a matrix detailing the' specific evaluation

- factors used to justify each system operability determination. The licensee acknowledged that any submittal made to the NRC could be subjected to a confirmatory inspectio .The NRC expressed some concern regarding the omission of the chemical and volume control and the reactor 'prntection systems (CVCS and RPS) from the Phase 1 operability review. The licensee acknowledged the NRC's concern and stated that the analysis (including .such factors = as safety significance, Plant _ Change / Modification status, maintenance and operating history) to determine which _ systems will ultimately be subjected to an operability review has not been completed. The , licensee agreed to provide the NRC with the results of the analysis and justification for omitting the CVCS and RPS by March 14, 1986.

f Phase 2 Select System Review Program ! The licensee representatives presented a summary of- Phase 2 of the Select ! ' System Review Program as outlined in pages 9-28 of the attached agenda. The licensee discussed the Phase 2 Milestone Events schedule, including the issuance of the System Effectiveness Study (SES) Fin'al Report on August 31, 1986 and the Draft Design Basis for all Select Systems on October 1,1986.

! The licensee has initiated weekly meetings between FPL management, site organization representatives, and the NRC resident inspectors to discuss the . ' progress and status of the Phase 2 Review Program. The licensee agreed to submit a monthly progress report (meeting summary) to the NRC beginning in

April 1986.

' Attachment: Select Systems Review l

-

! t

    '

f i

' . .
,
.. -

ATTACHMENT PRESENTATION TO N_ ON

    '

l FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT C TURKEY POINT NUCCEAR POWER PLANTS PRESENTED ON FEBRUARY 26,1966

-.. - - . .

 -

c . . _ ,

 '
.

AGENDA INTRODUCTION / MANAGEMENT'S t ACTION TO DATE II. PHASE 1 ASSESSMENT III. PHASE 2 ASSESSMENT e SUMMARY e ELEMENTS e ORGANIZATION & RESOURCES

  * INTEGRATED SCHEDULE & PROGRESS I CLOSING COMMENTS

PAGE 2 i _ _ ________.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . __ _ _

.
.
~

' INTRODUCTION / MANAGEMENT'S ACTION TO DATE REPORT ON PROGRESS OF THE SELECT SYSTEMS REVIEW PROGRAM 1. INSTALLED SITE ENGINEERING MANAGER 2. COMPLETED PHASE I SELECT SYSTEMS REVIEW 3. ESTABLISHED PHASE 2 SELECT SYSTEMS REVIEW PROGRAM 4. SUPPLEMENTED P.E.P. IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS:

 *

PROCEDURE UPDATE (PROJECT 3) DESIGN CONTROL (PROJECT 4)

*

MAINTENANCE (PROJECT 9) 5. ESTABLISHED AN ADVISORY PANEL FOR SELECT SYSTEMS APPROACH l PROGRAM I 6. ESTABLISHED COMMUNICATION OF PROJECT PROGRESS BY CONDUCTING WEEKLY l STATUS MEETINGS WITH FPL MANAGEMENT /N.R.C. RESIDENT INSPECTORS / SITE ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVES n ca s

-

_ _ _

'
. .
,
-

kranwrawr> ADVISORY PANEL PEOPLE: DIRECTOR OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT (C.E.)

VICE PRESIDENT OF PROJECTS (IMPELL) LICENSING PROJECT MANAGER (EBASCO) LICENSING MANAGER (WESTINGHOUSE) PROJECT ENGINEERING MANAGER (BECHTEL)

     ;

VICE PRESIDENT ENGINEERING SERVICES (EBASCO) DIRECTOR OF CONSTRUCTION (FPL) , PTP - SITE VICE PRESIDENT (FPL)

 ' SITE ENGINEERING MANAGER (FPL)

LICENSING SECTION SUPERVISOR (FPL) PTP ASSIST. PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER (FPL) PURPOSE: SERVE FPL DURING THE INITIAL PLANNING AND ORGANIZATIONAL PROGRAM PHASE BY:

 * ADVISING WITH REGARD TO THE DIRECTION, ADMINISTRATION,

, OVERALL REVIEW SCOPE AND CONTROL OF l THE MANAGEMENT ACTIONS l

 * ADVISING WITH REGARD TO THE ADEQUACY OF THE WORK SCOPE
 * PROVIDING INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENTS OF PROCESS P AGE 4

' t

  , , - - - - - _ m -
  ,
     - .- - A - -u a s-- n
       - - -

a_J e

 *

j . .

  .       I
,

i . L l O

        :

.i

  <      >

PAGE 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ ___ __ _ -____ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . __

--

-
.
'
-
.

ntASEIsturT) I PHASE 1 ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION: BASIS FOR SELECT SYSTEMS CHOSEN

 * UlTAL SAFETY FUNCTIONS AS DESCRIBED IN F.S. * UlTAL SUPPORT
 * MITIGATING SYSTEMS SAFETY INJECTION MAIN STEAM ISOLATION CONTAINMENT SPRAY EMERGENCY COOLERS EMERGENCY FILTERS CONTAINMENT ISOLATION
 * SUPPORT SYSTEMS 1. C. VITAL A.C/ EMERGENCY A.C. POWER
 * DUAL FUNCTION SYSTEMS (NORMAL AND EMERGENCY OPERATION)

PAGE 6 i _ _. - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

-
 .
   -
-
 :
   .
-

merntwo PEOPLE: FPL-S. PROCESS: BRRINSTORM SESSION INTERUIEIUS REUIElli BR AMSTORM ITEMS NTERVEV ITEMS DESKiN B ASIS F.S. SYSnN DEScRrTxmS SYSTEM PROCEDWtES SYSTEM YALYE ALIGftTNTS

POWER SLPPLY SYSTEM VALXDOYMS

        == euMT = 0RoERS PRODUCT:    S.E.G. INITI AL SYSTEMS REUIEIU REPORT OF 1/31/86 REPDRT ADDRESSING THE FDLLDIDING ISSUES:
        - C. I. DIESELS
        - M.S. I .V.

l l l l P AGE 7 _ _ - - _ _

. _ - - - - - - . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _

_ - _ . . _ .-__ , _ . _ _ _ _

-

'. . .
 ,
 .
-
 .
. .
/s u ar/<ttar TJ STATUS: e C.C.W. - PERFORMED SYSTEM FLOW CALCULATIONS REPOSITIONED R.H.R. H.X.'s - C.C.W. DISCHARGE VALVES VERIFICAT10N TESTING SCHEDULED DETAILED C.C.W. NETWORK ANALYSIS SCHEDULED C.C.W. VALVE TASK TEAM FORNED e I.C.W. - REDESIGN OF CV-2201/2202
  * DIESELS - JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION (JCO)

REGARDING DIESEL GENERATOR LOADING PERFORMING DIESEL GENERATOR CAPACITY / LOAD STUDY DEVELOPING ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR 18 MONTH INTEGRATED SAFEGUARD TESTING e M.S.I.V's - PART 21 COMPLETED WITH JC0 INTERIM MODIFICATIONS COMPLETED FOR P.T.P.-3/4 BY END OF P.T.P.- 4 OUTAGE FINAL MODIFICAT10NS UPON RECEIPT OF MATERI AL & SUFFICIENT DUTAGE DURATION TO IMPLEMENT

  * H.H.S.I. - RECIRCULATION VALVES BLOCKED OPEN PENDING FINAL RESOLUTION PAGE 8
. - - . . . .. _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _  . . _ . - - _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - - - _ _ - .

-
 ,

l

.
 . l
  '
 .
.

l l l f ) [ E RR lBMXDRTErif  ;

     )

l

      <
      ,

PAGE 9 - _ _ _ _ - . - - _ . - - - . _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -

u - - ---. -_a - -

 '
 -
.

MASE21ZetWTS(QWT)

-

PHASE 2 ASSESSMENT ' III.

RECONSTITUTION OF DESIGN BASIS -:

      !

. IDALKD0tDNS -4i ! i

COMPREHENSIDE REUIElU BY S.E.G.

t i

i i CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT I i ' i I J \

      /
     /
     ,r l     d

   (RESOLUTION OF ISSUES)

. I

'

PAGE 10

- - . - , - , , , , - , - , - .~ -- -r-  - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~  -~~~-~~~~~~--'

 , G
* *

*

e

   '

I

         .
         '
      -   l -
      -

2:n 1 a

         >

t

  =       .1 %

e _ E I \

           '
  >    a ,

y !E! !U8 S  :!! 4- -

        ---e, 3:

g t !s;

     "E  i t

i

        -

al

         >

s _

      $    ^. N
  $    % i =I a*E
          '
  *    ~
     -

k E 1 i WW E

      $

giI ** Ak k

       ! --
          #<

W W A j a

          $

W _A r ,,

K t

          =

U - r k

          !-
       - i Q =

gigr ol i

      .

m Eg y!- . 1 5 h ! 5

         :s 5 E risl    .
      < s i= E
         $l8  y u. 3  "

a 4 - i! -

         +

g a W- .

       ,

L-

          -

w

 >>         ! 8
          "

mW 5:  :  !

 <k    k r  W-II-I " E    d g  gtlA .

te

         **T E (f)    g$- . 4  !*$  -

y " 9 3g sh MW y"g H i U > Wi ?I a  !$e! w w .

       -

W u W s5-E ' a s W gf) A E*

  !!! 5 re!E WI
  <E PAGE 11
.
.- . - . .
 - _ _ _ . _ . .-_ - - .- ,__ - _ - , - _______ ______ _ -   _
        , -_-__ - -, _ _ - - . . . - ,

-
'. . .
-
.
.

mAsrzaemvisittwr) DESIGN BASIS EFFORT PEOPLE: FPL-SITE ENGINEERING MANAGER BECHTEL WESTINGHOUSE PROCESS: RECONSTITUTE THE DESIGN BASIS FOR THE SELECT SYSTEMS THROUGH THE FOLLOWING PROCESS:

 * REVIEW SYSTEM BOUNDARIES
 * KEY SYSTEM DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY EVALUATION
 * REVIEW LICENSING CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMITMENTS
 * REVIEW DESIGN AND ACCIDENT ANALYSES (ASSUMPTIONS,ETC.)

• ESTABLISH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CRITERIA USING DESIGN BASIS, ANALYSES,AND COMMITMENTS

 * EVALUATION SYSTEMS TESTING
 * VERIFY CONSISTENCY BETWEEN SYSTEM DOCUMENTS AND THE DESIGN BASIS (IE,):

DRAWINGS PROCEDURES TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Q-LIST VENDOR DOCUMENTS

 * RESOLVE INCONSISTENCIES AND MODIFY SYSTEM AS REQUIRED PRODUCT: * RECONSTITUTED DESIGN BASIS CONSISTENT WITH LICENSING COMMITMENTS AND ANALYSES
 * CONSISTENCY BETWEEN DESIGN BASIS AND AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
 * VERIFICATION OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE P AGE 12, l

c ! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-_ _ _ _ _ .

-
.- .
.

mAsarssomsfaav7) SMALL PIPING AND TUBING WALKDOWNS PEOPLE: FPL-SITE ENGINEERING MANAGER BECHTEL PROCESS: * PREPARE PROCEDURES

 * PREPARE AS-BUILT IS0 METRICS AND SUPPORT DRAWINGS
 * IDENTIFY AND IMPLEMENT MAINTENANCE ITEMS
 * REVIEW SYSTEMS FOR FUNCTIONALITY
 * COMPUTER ANALYZE PIPING AND TUBING
 * EVALUATE SUPPORT LOADS
 * IMPLEMENT MODIFICATIONS AS NECESSARY PRODUCT: * VERIFICATION OF SMALL PIPING AND TUBING FUNCTIONALITY FOR SELECT SYSTEMS
 * AS-BUILT RECORD OF ALL SMALL PIPING AND TUBING ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAFETY SYSTEMS
 * SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS P AGE 13 l

. .

nksr2 m 'onwy BREAKER LIST VERIFICATION PEOPLE: FPL CONSTRUCTION Q.C. INSPECTORS PROCESS: * DEVELOP AS BUILT VERIFICATION DIAGRAMS, DENOTE ANY DIFFERENCES FROM REFERENCED DRAWINGS AND AS-BUILT (IN FIELD) CONDITION FOR SELECT SYSTEM * PROCEDURES ISSUED

 * VERIFICATION WILL REFLECT LOADS SUPPLIED BY PANEL AND RESPECTIVE CIRCUlT BREAKERS INCLUDING:
 - BREAKER / PANEL LOCATION
 - BREAKER RATING INCLUDING TRIP SETTING FOR ADJUSTABLE UNITS
 - CABLE IDENTIFICATION AND DESTINATION (TIE POINTS)
 - FUSE RATING /SlZE/ TYPE
 - NAMEPLATE DATA FOR " PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT REVIEW TEAM".

- MARKED UP VERIFICATION DI AGRAMS WILL BE FORWARDED TO SITE DRAWING UPDATE FOR PROCESSIN DRAWING /AS-BUILT CONFLlCT WILL BE ADDRESSED ON "AS-BulLT VERIFICATION" REQUEST TO DRAWING UPDATE FOR REVIEW / ACTIO : - NON-CONFORMANCE CONDITIONS SUCH AS BROKEN / DAMAGED EQUIPMENT, CABLES, ETC. WILL BE DOCUMENTED FOR DISPOSITION PRODUCT: * CORRECTION OF DISCREPANCIES

* AS-BUILT BREAKER LIST P AGE 14
   -. . - _ . . . _ - _-- - - --

-
. .
.

MfMr2129tWiStt1MT) P. & l D. VERIFICATION PEOPLE: FPL CONSTRUCTION Q.C. INSPECTORS PROCESS: * WALKDOWN EXISTING PIPING SYSTEMS DENOTING ANY DIFFERENCES FROM P.& l.D. DRAWINGS AND EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS FOR SELECT SYSTEM * PROCEDURES ISSUED

  * VERIFICATION WILL REFLECT THE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES:
  - VALVES, PUMPS & MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AGREE WITH THE P. & l.D. FOR PROPER LOCATION, DESIGNATION AND POSITIO IN-LINE EQUIPMENT AGREE WITH P. & INSTRUMENTATION IS TAGGED AND LOCATED PROPERLY
  - EVERYTHING IS INSTALLED IN SYSTEM THAT IS SHOWN ON P & l.D. AND CONVERSELY EVERYTHING IN THE SYSTEM IS SHOWN ON P. & * MARKED UP P & l.D.'S ARE TRANSMITTED TO SITE DRAWING UPDATE FOR PROCESSING.

.

  * DRAWING /AS-BUILT CONFLICTS WILL BE ADDRESSED ON l    "AS-BUILT VERIFICATION" REQUEST TO DRAWING l    UPDATE FOR REVIEW / ACTIO * NON-CONFORMANCE CONDITIONS SUCH AS BROKEN / DAMAGED EQUIPMENT, CABLES, ETC. WILL BE DOCUMENTED FOR i

DISPOSITION l PRODUCT: * CORRECTION OF DISCREPANCIES j

  * AS-BUILT P&lD's l     PAGE 15

_ - - - -- -

- _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _  .__-. . . _ _ - - -

-
.- .
-

. . mAstzaenoristttwD OPERATING (T&E) DRAWINGS PEOPLE: FPL CONSTRUCTION Q.C. INSPECTORS PROCESS: * WALKDOWN EXISTING PIPING SYSTEMS DENOTING ANY DIFFERENCES FROM T & E DRAWINGS AND EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS FOR SELECT SYSTEM * PROCEDURES ISSUED

 * VERIFICATION REFLECTS THE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES:
 - VALVES, PUMPS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AGREE WITH THE T & E DRAWING FOR PROPER LOCATION, DESIGNATION AND POSITIO IN-LINE EQUIPMENT AGREE WITH THE DRAWING INSTRUMENTATION IS TAGGED AND LOCATED PROPERL EVERYTHING IS INSTALLED IN SYSTEM THAT IS SHOWN ON T & E DRAWING AND CONVERSELY EVERYTHING IN THE SYSTEM IS SHOWN ON T & E DRAWING * NON-CONFORMANCE CONDITIONS SUCH AS BROKEN / DAMAGED EQUIPMENT, CABLES, ETC. WILL BE DOCUMENTED FOR DISPOSITION PRODUCT: * CORRECTION OF DISCREPANCIES
 * AS-BUILT T&E DRAWINGS PAGE16
..

_

.
-

. . NASE 2EZ2975tLMD S.E.G. PHASE il COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW PEOPLE: FPL-SAFETY ENGINEERING GROUP i EBASCO PROCESS: * REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE I ITEM * S.E.G. DETAILED SELECT SYSTEMS REVIEW:.

   - WALKDOWNS 1) CONDITION 2) OPERATIONAL READINESS 3) VALVES 4) HOUSEKEEPING
   - TEST DATA REVIEW
   - SYSTEM PERFORl1ANCE ANALYSIS
   - DETAILED PROCEDURE REVIEW
   - SYSTEM TRAINING AUDIT
   - ITEMS IDENTIFIED SENT TO PUNCH LIST
  * REVIEW DESIGN BASIS
  * REVIEW RESOLUTION OF PUNCH LIST ITEM * S.E.G. GENERIC REVIEW:
   - PWO PROCESS
   - PROCEDURE-TO-PROCEDURE COORDINATION
   - PLANT HOUSEKEEPING
   - CONTROL OF ACTIVITIES THAT MIGHT ADVERSELY IMPACT OPERATIO PRODUCT: FUNCTIONABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECONSTITUTED DESIGN BASIS PAGE 17

_ .._. -. ._ _ , - _ - ____ -- _ . _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

     -
      . __. __ _ _ _

.
. .
-
. .
-
*
/ wast 212emselvvy CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PEOPLE: FPL - SITE ENGINEERING MANAGER EBASCO PROCESS:

1) REVIEW EXISTING DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURE ) REVIEW EXISTING PROCESS 3) DEVELOP ENHANCED CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TOTAL EQUIPMENT DATA BASE, 0-LIST, DRAWING INDEX, PROCEDURES, ET PRODUCT: SUPPLEMENTED DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES & PROCESS l l PAGE 10

.
-
.

masrsnemst2.uro RESOLUTION OF ISSUES PEOPLE: FPL-SITE ENGINEERING MANAGER BECHTEL PROCESS: EVALUATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE & REPORTABILITY DEVELOP CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR EACH ISSU IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN j FOR EACH ISSU CLOSE OUT ISSUE PRODUCT: ENHANCED SELECT SYSTEMS l

! PAGE 19

__________________ __-________ _____ - _-__-__________ __ _ j .. SELECT SYSTEMS ISSUES PROCESS .

          .
,
          .

i' 50.59 NOTIFY ClSION DN

     & REVIEW & YES PLANT  REGULATORY NO IDENTIFIED   MGR &

ISSUES v TECH. SPE COMPLIANCE MPACT TURN DN REPORTA8LITY l PLANT

EN j NO , YES 50.72/50.73 , m k

        ( sSuE REPO,n )

l Il I SYSTEMS REVIEW TEAM t (CATEGORIZE / l ACTION PL AN)

       +
      ( RESOLUTION
           ,
     -

_ _ _ _ _ . _ - - _ _ - - -- _ _ _

____ _ _-____ _ _______ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ . . _ _ .

j

.
     ' PR/OR '

c , ..

          .

PTE

          ~

EEBONEERORS GRSAROEATOGE CHART i r , IPL BACKFIT l CNIEF CONSTBBCTION SITE ENGINEEE MENESEE

. , PTN PBSJECT TECWelCAL PTN SITE 2 ENGINEERINE DMECmN ' ENGINEERINE MANGEEE BEPRESENTATINE h h ' PRiklECT TECHNICAL i uuuuuusu

   " " " " "
      -
        ""_["" _
  :.

f JPE r l ENGINEERING FPL JUNO ' j q PLANNER ENGINEERING l ' I BECHTEL DESIGN ENGINEERING

      . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ .. _ __ .. - _ _ _ _  _ .__ . - .
      .

fRESENT' ,

           -

saw musinanname ansamization cuarr _ ; I TWRKET PGINT NGCLEAR POWER PLANT I r r

  ,      (PTP PLANT f1ANAGER)

CMIEF TECHNICAL ENSINEERINE y I ENGINEEg MONSEEE TECHNICAL REGULATION ! . _ _ ,_ L L & COMPLIANCE

'

sms,mmmy l l I I  : ENGINEERING ENGINEERS 8 sk"s^sss t E r 3 f BECHTEL SITE ' JUNO DESIGN JPE JPE

 ' 2    (ENGINEERIN V

l I I (SELECTED SAFET ' F BACKFIT WSYSTEMS PLANT

  & {NGjp{{fjNG   (ENGINEERING

, l N l l (555} = TEftPDRARY bEhld'N [S'E'L'E'Ci5b'5 5i5b'S e S 10 ( DESIGN (ENGINEERS

-

_ _ . . _ ___ _ _ _ _

       --
. .
.
.
.

a m a,anasa-v SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT (TEMPORARY)

 (FROM FPL,C.E., WESTINGHOUSE,EBASCO, & BECHTEL)

GROUP * PROPOSED /ADDED SYSTEM MANAGERS 14 ENGINEERS (ADDED) TECH STAFF SYSTEM ENGINEERS PERFORMANCE ENGINEERS (UNDER REVEV) J.P.E. SITE 6 ENGlNEERS (UNDER REVEV) 2 LICENSING ENGINEERS (ADDED) J.P.E. JUNO 2 civil ENGINEERS (ADDED) 3 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS (ADDED) 5 MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ADDED) 31 & C ENGINEERS (ADDED) 3 LICENSING ENGINEERS (ADDED) 4 CLERICAL (ADDED)

'

I RELIABILITY ENGINEER (ADDED) ! BECHTEL SITE 50 ENGINEERS (ADDED)

S. ADDITIONAL ENGINEERS (UNDER REVEV) l

       ,

PAGE 23 l t

- - -.--- ---- - --- _- , _ _ . - , . - - - - , .- - - ,

M O e 4 ACCOMPLISHMENTS WITHIN LAST THREE WEEKS 1) IMPLEMENTED SYSTEMS APPROACH (FOR ENHANCED ENGINEERING REVIEW AND PROCESS CONTROL) 2) INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN WITH DEDICATED PURCHASING AND EXPEDITING 3) DEVELOPED METHOD FOR PGM BUDGETING AND SCHEDULIN ) DEVELOPED SELECT SYSTEMS PUNCHLIST (A SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY, TRACK, AND RESOLVE OPEN ISSUES) 5) REVISED AND AUGMENTED ENGINEERING STAFF 6) INITIATED THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TOTAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS SCHEDULE WITH RESOURCE LOADING 7) ESTABLISHED REVIEW TEAM FOR CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PAGE 24

    -

    .-
'.  ,. .,
  -
 .
'

EVAsar2 St;M2uf94LDV7) _ SELECT SYSTEMS REVIEW - PHASE II MILESTONE EVENTS 2LL4/86 - CONSOLIORTION OF 10ENTIFIE0 IUORK ITEMS ("PUNCHLIST"). SOURCES USED-

     * PLANT CHANGE /NODIFICATION (PC/M)
     * REQUEST FOR ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE (REA)
     * REQUEST FOR ENGINEERING ESTIMATE (REE)
     * REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (RTA)
     * COMMITMENT TRACKING (CTRAC)
     * ENGINEERING WORK ORDER (EWO)
     * PLANT WORK ORDER (PWO)
     * INTERVIEW
     * FILE REVIEWS 2/24/86 - REUIElU & CRTEGORIZE PUNCHLIST 2/27/86 - SORT PUNCHLIST FOR PRESENT UNIT # 4 OUTAGE &

UPCOMING UNIT * 3 REFUELING OUTAGE 3/15/86 - RSSEMBLE SELECT SYSTEMS DOCUMENTS FOR DESIGN BASIS RECANSTITUTION DOCUMENTS TO BE ASSEMBLED FOR REVIEW BV THE DESIGN BASIS TEAM INCLUDE:

      * OPERATING DI AGRAMS
      * PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION DI AGRAMS(P&lD's)
      * ELECTRICAL SCHEMATICS
      * CONTROL LOGICS
      * SYSTEMS DESCRIPTIONS
      * PLANT DATA BOOK
      * OPERATING PROCEDURES
      * EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
      * TECHNICAL SPECIFIC ATIONS
      * STANDARD OPERABILITY REVIEW PROGRAM (50RP)
      * Q-LIST 4/1/96  - RECONSTITUTED DESIGN BASIS FOR R.F.lD. COMPLETE (PROTOTVPE FORMAT FOR REMAINING SELECT SYSTEMS)

P AGE 25 . _ _ - . . _ . . . _ _ _ - . _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . - _ . . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ -------

'. .. .
 .
.
'

M4sr2 ,st.7ezvstst'arv 4/1/86 - BEGIN RECONSTITUTION OF DESIGN BRSIS FOR SELECT SYSTEMS SELECT SYSTEMS:

  * INSTRUMENT AIR
  * INTAKE COOLING WATER
  * COMPONENT COOLING WATER
  * SAFETYINJECTION
  * CONTAINMENT SPRAY
  * MAIN STEAM ISOLATION
  * EMERGENCY COOLING
  = EMERGENCY POWER
  * EMERGENCY FILTERS
  * CONTAINMENT ISOLATION
  * VITAL RECONSTITUTION OF DESIGN BASIS FOR THE SELECT SYSTEMS THROUGH THE FOLLOWING PROCESS:

REVIEW SYSTEMS BOUNDARIES (SORP BASELINE,etc.)

EVALUATE KEY SYSTEM DOCUNENTS APPLICABILITY REVIEW LICENSING CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMITMENTS REVIEW DESIGN AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS (ASSUMPTIONS,etc.)

ESTABLISH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CRITERA USING DESIGN BASIS ANALYSIS AND COMMITMENTS EVALUATE SYSTEM TESTING VERIFY CONSISTENCY BETWEEM SYSTEM DOCUMENTS AND THE DESIGN BASIS (i.e.,):

   * DRAWINGS
   * PROCEDURES
   * TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
   * Q-LIST
   * VENDOR DOCUMENTS RESOLVE INCONSISTENCIES AND MODIFY SYSTEM AS REQUIRED 4/3/86 - DEUELOP SELECT SYSTEMS " PROJECT /2" SCHEDULE (ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES RESOURCE LOADED & INTEGRATED WITH CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR ALL PUNCHLIST ITEMS)

4/25/86 - R.F.tp. AURILABILITV/RELI ABILITV STUDY (SYSTEM EFFECTIVENES STUDY-S.E.G.)

l 5/7/86 - UNIT *4 A.F.W. SYSTEM OUTAGE ITEMS COMPLETE (OR BY END l OF PTP=4 - UNIT *4 WALKDOWNS(INSIDE CONTAINMENT) COMPLETE

  * 2" AND UNDER PIPING AND TUBING
  = P&lD's FOR SELECT SVTEMS
  * TRAINING & EDUCATIONAL DRAWINGS
  * BREAKER LIST (INSIDE UNIT *4 CONTAINMENT)

I l P AGE 26 l l ! - _ - _. _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ ._ _ _

  -
      ;

_ - . -

. , , ,
-
.
'

FWAsir2 MaZVMESittWT) 6/1/86 - DEUELOP DETAILED CONFIGURATION MRNAGEMENT SYSTEM (DRAWING UPDATE PROGRAM)

  * TOTAL EQUIPMENT DATA BASE
  * Q-LIST   l
  * ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION (E.Q.)

• INSTRUMENT INDEX

  * VALVE INDEX
  * BREAKER LIST   1
  * P&lD/s   '
  * OPERATOR DDAWINGS  .

8/31/86 - SYSTEM EFFECTIUENESS STUDY (S.E.S.) FINAL REPORT 10/1/86 - ISSUE DRRFT DESIGN BRSIS FOR RLL SELECT SYSTEMS 12/1/86 - SAFETY ENGINEERING ERDUPIS.E.E.) PHASE II REUIElU CDMPLETE

 * REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE 1 ITEMS
 * SUBMIT DESIGN BASIS CONTENT RECOMMENDAT10N
 * DETAILED SYSTEM REVIEW A) WALKDOWNS 1) MATERI AL CONDITION 2) OPERATIONAL READINESS 3) HOUSEKEEPING B) TEST DATA REVIEW C) SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW D) DETAILED PROCEDURE REVIEW E) SYSTEM TRAINING AUDIT
 * REYlEW DESIGN BASIS
 * REVIEW PUNCHLIST RESOLUTION
 * S.E.G. GENERIC REVIEW A) PWO PROCESS B) PROCEDURE FUNCTIONAL COORDINATION C) PLANT HOUSEKEEPING D) CONTROL OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT MIGHT ADVERSELY IMPACT OPERATION SPI l LNG - ALL OUTAGE RELATED NDDIFICATION & REPAIRS ON gg  SELECT SYSTEMS INCLUDING A. IT's - ALL FIELD INSPECTION & WALKDOWNS ON SELECT SYSTEMS OUTAGE)

FRLL - ALL RENAINING DUTAGE RELATED NODIFICATIONS, REPAIRS.&__ 1987 INSPECTIONS (tJt BY ElO OF l.MIT * 4 REFIELMG OUTAGE) PAGE27

       ..
.

O r , Ul

!

a i <5 g

  ,
   -
     *

N l l!> sg !!  ! , " g ti,!  !

           *

E B .,

! usi     =

0 t ' s F**ls  !  ;

         (.jj N < N I    !* !    ! d

E i 5 ' E

&     z   !!  g 5       .-
          ~   t E

I

-

i i

   -

z i i ,

           !+
           * eiI U

z

   ! != l !
       -
          [
=

z

    =   le  0 1--t, i

e ,

*         8g i   i   Eg 8 -

a w le.=g 5 e 3 I - y a _

             ~
             *
*m e b    E a

8! BE jg "' E

$    ML
~

ni 4 h f' -

        *   /

a s  % "

            .
$h !  5      5 8-d- -

l 9 ha5" !l <

         '
           : .

W k .!8 -5 __.i._l:x = l I! V

. _

y sl ul km=^"*34a " l l l a

= .ti  i h    i !.!

a; L-

           - "!

m as-

         '

. .

:
=

lil altr' ill E a

!

t I a a

 !8     !I
 *

si = d 5 i e a a a P AGE 26 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . . - _ . . . _ ___ _ ..__ .--__- _

           -- _ _ _ ___

a ,_ _ ----_a-- a a - ,_s - - w- - - --, --- -- E e I ( 3 E O i i i i I P AGE 29  !

 .--- -.
 .
  .--_-_-

}}