IR 05000250/1991006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-250/91-06 & 50-251/91-06 on 910128-0201.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Protected Area Physical Barriers, Status of Security Upgrade Program & Packages & Vehicles
ML20217B769
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/25/1991
From: Tillman A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20217B764 List:
References
50-250-91-06, 50-250-91-6, 50-251-91-06, 50-251-91-6, NUDOCS 9103120215
Download: ML20217B769 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m UNITED ST ATES . oq jo NUCLEAR nEGULATORY COMMISSION

[[eAtc / n    REGION 11 AN O OROIA 03h
%-***** ,

Report Nos.: 50-250/91-06 and 50-251/91-06 L Licenseu florida Power and Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33102 Docket Nos.: 50-250 and 50-251 License Nos.: DPR-31 and DPR-41 Facility Name: Turkey Point 3 and 4 Inspection Cond ted: January 28 , February 1, 1991 Inspector: A. Tillman, M / h k Date Signed (igaNsInspector Approved by: kg P Z 2( / D. R. McGuire, Chief fate pigtied Safeguards Section Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of Physical Security Program for Power Reactors: Management Support, Protected Area Physical Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aids; Protected Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Compensatory Measures and Communication In addition, the status of the Security Upgrade Program was reviewed and discussed with Security and Engineering Management to include attendance at the weekly security upgrade meeting chaired by the Licensee's Outage Manager. The licensee's actions to resolve allegations of improprieties in security operations referred to the licensee by Region II was also reviewe Results: In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identifie Observation and assessment of ongoing security operational activities revealed that improvements in the management and operational effectiveness of the

' Security Program noted during previous inspections was being sustaine Observations and discussion with security and engineering personnel revealed that activities related to the Security Program Upgrade were generally on schedule and no major delay in completion was anticipate Review o' the licensee's investigation and documented actions in response to five allegations of questionable security practices, all of which were referred to the licensee for resolution by Region II, concluded that appropriate actions PD O

hC 50 bb b iN V

       # v
       "

PDR <

       , m N .. ,, l l ",,
.  ._   _ . . . _ . - _ _ . _ . . .
.
..K'

SAFEGlJARDS INFORMATION 2 -

         :

were initiated and the allegations were adequately resolve No violations of  ; regulatory requirements were -identified or substantiated relative to the allegation '

.

~

l \

       '3(

SAFEGU ARDS INFORf# tic" :ms,.,,,R .!?v.J'% n , - -o.A+am b a

      ,

I

~ - . . ~ . - _ . . _ , _ _ , . . - , . . . . .

}}