IR 05000250/1992033

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-250/92-33 & 50-251/92-33 on 921130-1204.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected. Physical Barriers,Intrusion Detection Alarms,Communication & Training & Qualification Plan.Rept Partially Withheld
ML20126E387
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/23/1992
From: Mcguire D, Thompson D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20126E367 List:
References
50-250-92-33, 50-251-92-33, NUDOCS 9212290112
Download: ML20126E387 (1)


Text

"

>

'

.

gtP ,, h4 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION UNITID $T Af tS 8- '4o NUCLEAn HEGULATOnY COMMISSION

8 /o Mf GION il 91 LiAIOtVT A 51 HE[Y, g E g ? AT L ANT A,01OHGI A 30323

.....

Report No /92-33 and 50 251/92-33 Licensee: flarida Power and Light Company 9250 West flagler Street Miami, FL 33102 Docket No and 50-251 License Hos. DPR-31 and DPR-41 facility Name: Turkey Point 3 and 4

_nspection Conducted :

'

November 30 - December 4, 199?

Inspector: . _a [

b-~ % mpson . 'L'Es ca inspector ~ Date Signed ~

~

Approved by: I

.

h w,.

cGuire, Chief

-

hCate 2J/ 5Tgned Safeguards Section Nuclear Materials safety and Safeguards Branch Divisior, of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY Scope:

This toutine, unannnunced inspection was conducted in the areas of Physical Barrit.rs, Intrusion Dete:: tion Alarms, Communication, Contingency Operations, Compensatory Mee.suras, Access Control (Personnel and Vehicles), Alarm Stations, Lighting, Security Force Annual Audit, and Training and Qualificatio Results:

In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified. The licensee continues to provide strong support for the security programs, audits j were a strength, as well as the continued maintenance support to re-constrhet equipment to pre-Hurricane Andrew conditions. Two licensee initiated drills

, were observed and in both drills the on duty security force was capable of responding to the contingency and neutralized the situation. The inspector noted, while conducting lighting surveys, that in some areas the pro *ected area lighting was less than 0.2 footcandles but in compliance with the commitments of the Physical Security Pla LWument trp%tted herewith ADOCK 06000250 PDR 0 PDR %:M0%- .-

., a,,n,