ML20092B698: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:996                                                                                                                                          1
    ,                                        ~~ ~~                                                                                      '
w Business  BPI M    ~
and Professional People for the Public Interest" 109 North
 
==Dearborn Street,==
Suite 1300
* Chicago, lltinois 60602
* Telephone. (312) 6415570            y
( 'T
                                                                                                                        '84 JL'N 20 ml :03 June 18, 1984                            yh . $ $ g,        i BR t.Nc8 HAND-DELIVFRY Mr. Michael I. Miller Isham, Lincnin & Beale Three First National Plaza 52nd Floor Chicago, IL                60602 Re:      Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-454 and 50-455
 
==Dear Mike:==
 
This will confirm our telephone conversation of this morning.
During the prehearing conference you informed me that                                                          ,
all documents produced by you would be availabic cither at Isham, Lincoln & Beale or at Sargent & Lundy. Acting on that information, we reviewed last week all documents pro-duced at Isham's offices, which were represented to be all l                  the documents you would be producing (with the exception of l                  the Sargent & Lundy documents discussed below).
This morning you told me that there are approximately five more file drawers of documents, at the site, falling within the request.                      Because I have made arrangements to
;                  revicu the Sargent & Lundy documents the week of the 25th j                  when I have a technical person to aid me in my review, you l
have agreed to make these availabic in Chicago the week of
!                  the 25th so that my technical reviewer may review them as                                                              '
!                  wall.
l l
'    [  o.,.....                          -                                n, . s u..          m.,
j
,      ,_ , , ,,,,,          s ..,au.
i          u.        . ,,..,
                                                      .. o.n .e i ., .. . ii,. u.    ,    ,,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,  3,,.,,,.
Pr.,d.a,              [,' . r    *$
                                                          .#d  ye the        at a    ,9 ho"          "      '            #    *"
Af,'",4.";l7,          5 0.* ,'"""'          l0';,.',"f,"ll"'"      O/"7..".'''"'' """" " T S * ',",'"'        '*IT'1.!*.L.,+.-
        '"J *;77";..,.        ":'"f1"'              lin,";r'. .            ""''t;; Ifi;;'"
C, "."';";"*;,' ..      ' a"'a**
                              ?:::;"oi,';";.        C'?".',f".',*          t:1?",              i;::::N:'::            ?"A' 't.*E'"'"
c>;;:g".,",.~.,. s' s, .. . u    *,4 d'r,," *,",*'
          ,-,...,              r.a.'.,',P,
                                      . . '!!l,''  2", u"o'0', ,
                                                    . ~ , c., ,            Lt"'s.%;.;.-
u..,e, L.ne D ,ia,5 7        John 4 M-Fa.gM,.        W..w W Wmt.e h
0 hK0 PDR 4
M D3_.
 
o  Mr. Michael I. Miller                      June 18, 1984 You also indicated you would try to get me an " informal" copy of your interrogatory responses sometime today and a formal response by Wednesday. I trust that holds true for                                  i your formal response to my requeat for the production of documents since, without your response, we cannot know whether you have produced all documents in each category, and to which requests, i f HrT9, you are ob,lecting. The fact that this in holding up our preparation of our canc --
not to mention our discovery of your canc -- is obvious.
Picase be advised that we may weli need to seek an extension of, at a minimum, submiiision of Intervenors' profiled testimony (if any), and possibly postponement of the commencement of the hearing itself.                                                    '
Very truly yours,      ,
Su- h      .kl    1  AD Jane M. Whicher JMW/amh cc:  Service List l
l l
l 4
d}}

Latest revision as of 23:31, 12 May 2020

Confirms 840618 Telcon Re 840625 Review of Addl Documents Produced by Mi Miller.Advises of Possible Request for Extension of Submission of Intervenor Prefiled Testimony & Postponement of Hearing.Related Correspondence
ML20092B698
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/18/1984
From: Whicher J
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE FOR THE PUBLIC INTERES, WHICHER, J.M.
To: Mark Miller
ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
References
NUDOCS 8406200336
Download: ML20092B698 (2)


Text

996 1

, ~~ ~~ '

w Business BPI M ~

and Professional People for the Public Interest" 109 North

Dearborn Street,

Suite 1300

  • Chicago, lltinois 60602
  • Telephone. (312) 6415570 y

( 'T

'84 JL'N 20 ml :03 June 18, 1984 yh . $ $ g, i BR t.Nc8 HAND-DELIVFRY Mr. Michael I. Miller Isham, Lincnin & Beale Three First National Plaza 52nd Floor Chicago, IL 60602 Re: Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2)

Docket Nos. 50-454 and 50-455

Dear Mike:

This will confirm our telephone conversation of this morning.

During the prehearing conference you informed me that ,

all documents produced by you would be availabic cither at Isham, Lincoln & Beale or at Sargent & Lundy. Acting on that information, we reviewed last week all documents pro-duced at Isham's offices, which were represented to be all l the documents you would be producing (with the exception of l the Sargent & Lundy documents discussed below).

This morning you told me that there are approximately five more file drawers of documents, at the site, falling within the request. Because I have made arrangements to

revicu the Sargent & Lundy documents the week of the 25th j when I have a technical person to aid me in my review, you l

have agreed to make these availabic in Chicago the week of

! the 25th so that my technical reviewer may review them as '

! wall.

l l

' [ o.,..... - n, . s u.. m.,

j

, ,_ , , ,,,,, s ..,au.

i u. . ,,..,

.. o.n .e i ., .. . ii,. u. , ,,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 3,,.,,,.

Pr.,d.a, [,' . r *$

.#d ye the at a ,9 ho" " ' # *"

Af,'",4.";l7, 5 0.* ,'"""' l0';,.',"f,"ll"'" O/"7..".'" """" " T S * ',",'"' '*IT'1.!*.L.,+.-

'"J *;77";..,. ":'"f1"' lin,";r'. . ""t;; Ifi;;'"

C, "."';";"*;,' .. ' a"'a**

?:::;"oi,';";. C'?".',f".',* t:1?", i;::::N:'::  ?"A' 't.*E'"'"

c>;;:g".,",.~.,. s' s, .. . u *,4 d'r,," *,",*'

,-,..., r.a.'.,',P,

. . '!!l, 2", u"o'0', ,

. ~ , c., , Lt"'s.%;.;.-

u..,e, L.ne D ,ia,5 7 John 4 M-Fa.gM,. W..w W Wmt.e h

0 hK0 PDR 4

M D3_.

o Mr. Michael I. Miller June 18, 1984 You also indicated you would try to get me an " informal" copy of your interrogatory responses sometime today and a formal response by Wednesday. I trust that holds true for i your formal response to my requeat for the production of documents since, without your response, we cannot know whether you have produced all documents in each category, and to which requests, i f HrT9, you are ob,lecting. The fact that this in holding up our preparation of our canc --

not to mention our discovery of your canc -- is obvious.

Picase be advised that we may weli need to seek an extension of, at a minimum, submiiision of Intervenors' profiled testimony (if any), and possibly postponement of the commencement of the hearing itself. '

Very truly yours, ,

Su- h .kl 1 AD Jane M. Whicher JMW/amh cc: Service List l

l l

l 4

d