ML20084H610

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Paragraph 2 of Intervenor Responding to Util 840416 Notification Ltr on Commitments Q,R,S,T & X Should Be Disregarded
ML20084H610
Person / Time
Site: Byron  
Issue date: 05/02/1984
From: Chavez D
DEKALB AREA ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY, SINNISSIPPI ALLIANCE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT (SAFE)
To: Bielawski A
ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
References
OL, NUDOCS 8405080126
Download: ML20084H610 (2)


Text

_

r, tPp A DDCKET NUMBER PROD e UTIL FAC..,kY 33-Y db n%KETED Sinnissippi Alliance for the Environment 326 North Avon Street Rockford, Illigig1_184U25 Alan Bielawski

'Effd. YE N i Isham, Lincoln & Beale 001. BRANC@iay 2,1984 Suite 5200 Three First National Plaza Chicago, Il.

60602 Re:

Intervene a.ia wealth Edison'y 1, 1984 response to Common-s April 16, 1984 notification letter on Commitments Q R,

S.

T, and X.

Dear Alan:

Pertaining to our phone conversation this morning Intervenors wish to notify parties to disregard paragraph two of the cover let-ter to Intervenors May 1, 1984 response letter.

Paragraph two er-roneously states that "Intervenors will petition the Board for a hearing within fifteen days hereof, if Commitments Q, R S

and T are not satisfied".

As you indicated by phone the provisions of the March 30, 1983 Stipulation signed by the parties to the Byron Operating License Proceedings sets the deadline for Intervenors to petition the Board for hearings on any commitments we still consider unmet, at thirty days from Intervenors reciept of the company notification that all commitments have been met.

Thank you for the correct information.

Intervenors apologize to the parties for the harsh tenor of paragraph two and wish to cor-rect any misimpression in the minds of the parties due to a reading of the cover letter, that Intervenors are " gung-ho" for further hearings.

Paragraph two was written under the mistaken interpret-8405080126 840502 gDRADOCK0500o434

,po voR

'v 2

i

\\

i ation of the St mulation that Intervenors would waive petition i

rights if they were not exercised thiNty days from reciept of the Company's notification that each individual commitment had been sat-isfied.

Intervenors acknowledge the basic error and apologize for any inco.nvenience it created.

As I discussed with you over the phone. Intervenors await Commonwealth Edison's response to our May 1, 1984 letter, and will gladly cooperate with the Company in seek-ing to resolve remaining issues.

Intervenors will, at the Company's request assist with suggestions, in the good-faith assumption that such suggestions will be used constructively and not merely critic-ized.

Intervenors also agree that the Company's request for a com-pletion date for Intervenors spot check verification of the distrib-ution of Public Information Brochures in connection with Commitment T is reasonable.

That information will be provided in our response.

One last matter.

I renew with the Company, Intervenors request to be provided with a copy of IPRA. Revision 1.

We understand the Company's position that it regards these first five Commitment not-ification letters as independent of IPRA.

We do not agree that the Commitments are not unrelated and would be easier in our minds if we did have it for verification and suggestion purposes.

Very truly yours, kk LW legal represedtative, DAARE/ SAFE cc Richard Rawson Judges Smith, Cole, Callihan Jane Whicher

..