ML20090L209

Urges Requested Documents & Info Necessary to Respond to 840509 Discovery Requests Be Gathered,Even Though Objection Will Be Made to Relevancy.Document Request 17 Will Be Dropped.Related Correspondence

ML20090L209
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	05/21/1984
From:	Whicher J BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE FOR THE PUBLIC INTERES, WHICHER, J.M.
To:	Mark Miller ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
References
OL, NUDOCS 8405250243
Download: ML20090L209 (2)

Text

39O atuTEo cORRESPONDENQt

-r 3

w BPI

~

'T fJ ~ Business and Professional 109 North

Dearborn Street,

Suite 1300

• People for the Public Chicago, i:linois 60602 =

Int 6ry$#6gb~

Telephone: (312) 641- j

(

May 21, 1984 24 AJ/ gg y.

HAND DELIVERY E T/h[$$;hN' BR vb if Mr. Michael I. Miller -

Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza 52nd Floor Chicago, Illinois 60602 Re: Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron Nuclear Station, Units and 2)

Docket Nos. 50-454 and 50-455 L-

Dear Mike:

This morning we met concerning my discovery requests to you of May 9.

You have indicated your intention to make objections based on relevancy grounds to, inter alia, Document Requests 18 through 36 (and portions of 37 and 38) and Interrogatories 13 through 23 and 25 through 26. As I understand your position, because these relate to neither the reinspection program nor Systems Control Corporation, they are, until further order of the Licensing Board, beyond the scope of the remanded hearings.

It is clear that we will not know the precise scope of the remanded proceedings until some time after May 30. Therefore, in order to avoid any delay, I urge you to begin gathering the re-quested documents, and the information necessary to answer the interrogatories, in spite of your present objection. In this way, no unnecessary delay will result should the Board decide to in-clude these issues.

We also agreed that I will drop Document Request 17 on your representation that this program is in effect only at Braidwood and not Byron.

3

(~~' *' aa=,c:;n.c:.,

s-- ~.n

':::."; ~~

,n . co,oon co iP .

cn.k:r.,

• ~"

^= =~- ~*on u.u x---

"# Barbara T. Bowman I#" O"'" N#" '# N#88**"#

Ronald Garywinska A,.nand.t Pohkoff R nard P h f1 R C C. o Ch e. H A an K 9OfCouns Admin ls re e Assrstant

• ";'B';:,*:. .. ":% EL*  %"a"e"'n.n,., CMR'"," g2,"::,';%., '~'~~~

cec:g. "" h"'%"o?:" n"?",*:::" W& f:=::;"M.,':  ??RW'**

.,...R sch cu,M"','"

= .'o n Wa " s ;,;,,;;aa R"U" ., L,"*L"3""',' " XM*::n

(

8405250243 840521

~

J PDR ADOCK 05000454

__~

0

~_

PDR O\ g

r .

.,o_

Mr. Michael I. Miller May 21, 1984

-Page Two Finally, you agreed to add to Document Request 37'those documents referred to in responding to Interrogatory 12. -This was an inadvertent omission on my part.

I-look forward to our Thursday meeting-to discuss our varying views'on the scope of the remanded hearings.

~

Very'truly yours, ,

c1 ,

Jane M. Whicher JMW/amh cc: Service List Steve Lewis, Region-III Counsel

. c .

._J