ML19323B988: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:*
800'5140yp5
800'5140yp5 P
,
LQA8000269 pebraska Public Power District
P LQA8000269 pebraska Public Power District
_      _              _
                                                       " '" El fyb bbe"""
                                                       " '" El fyb bbe"""
May 8,1980 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
May 8,1980 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Line 42: Line 40:
constitute an unreviewed safety question.                                  I l
constitute an unreviewed safety question.                                  I l


-
1 Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito                                                l May 8,1980                                                            l Page Two                                                              ;
1
  -
Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito                                                l May 8,1980                                                            l Page Two                                                              ;
Once again, the District would like to indicate disagreement with the imposition of a Class II amendment fee relative to changes in sampling station locations. These changes which have occurred on several occasions in the past are neither under the the control of the District nor the NRC. The District has previously proposed that changes to the sampling stations necessitated by factors beyond the control of the District be routinely made and subsequently reported as part of the Annual Operating Report. It is our understanding that the Commission's legal staff had objections to such action and the matter was not pursued further.
Once again, the District would like to indicate disagreement with the imposition of a Class II amendment fee relative to changes in sampling station locations. These changes which have occurred on several occasions in the past are neither under the the control of the District nor the NRC. The District has previously proposed that changes to the sampling stations necessitated by factors beyond the control of the District be routinely made and subsequently reported as part of the Annual Operating Report. It is our understanding that the Commission's legal staff had objections to such action and the matter was not pursued further.
Since this alternate method for resolution of this issue has not been accepted, the District requests that the Class II fee in the amount of $1,200 submitted with Reference 1 for Sampling Station changes be refunded since that request was not acted upon.
Since this alternate method for resolution of this issue has not been accepted, the District requests that the Class II fee in the amount of $1,200 submitted with Reference 1 for Sampling Station changes be refunded since that request was not acted upon.
Line 55: Line 50:
Sincerely yours, M
Sincerely yours, M
Jay 1. Pilant Director of Licensing and Quality Assurance JMP/jdw:bn8/1 Attachment
Jay 1. Pilant Director of Licensing and Quality Assurance JMP/jdw:bn8/1 Attachment
                                                                          .
    *


'
Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito May 8,1980 Page Three STATE OF NEBRASKA )
Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito May 8,1980 Page Three STATE OF NEBRASKA )
                                     ) ss PLATTE COUNTY                    )
                                     ) ss PLATTE COUNTY                    )
Line 64: Line 56:
MA                >
MA                >
W M1 Pilant subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me this          day of May.
W M1 Pilant subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me this          day of May.
   % L/ M k sat
   % L/ M k sat NOTARY PUBLIf I
    '
My Commission expires                        / [f((] .
NOTARY PUBLIf I
My Commission expires                        / [f[[] .
BERESAL BOTAN. State of Estriska MARILYN R. HoHNDoRF N,    bly Comm. Esp. Oct 14,1980
BERESAL BOTAN. State of Estriska MARILYN R. HoHNDoRF N,    bly Comm. Esp. Oct 14,1980
                                                                               .}}
                                                                               .}}

Latest revision as of 02:34, 16 March 2020

Discusses 780711 Application to Amend EIS for License DPR-46,changing Radiological Sampling Stations.States Disagreement W/Imposition of Class II Fee for Changes in Sampling Locations.Affidavit Encl
ML19323B988
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/08/1980
From: Pilant J
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: Ippolito T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19323B989 List:
References
LQA8000269, NUDOCS 8005140485
Download: ML19323B988 (3)


Text

800'5140yp5 P

LQA8000269 pebraska Public Power District

" '" El fyb bbe"""

May 8,1980 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Proposed Change to Environmental Technical Specifications Cooper Nuclear Station NRC Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46

Reference:

1) Letter from J. M. Pilant to T. A. Ippolito Dated July 11,1978, " Proposed Changes to Environmental Technical Specifications"
2) Letter from T. A. Ippolito to J. M. Pilant Dated March 9, 1979, " Amendment 54 to the Facility Operating License - Delete Requirements for Thermal Mixing Zone Limits and the Associated Monitoring Program"
3) Letter from J. M. Pilant to B. K. Grimes Dated May 25, 1979, " Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications"

Dear Mr. Ippolito:

Reference 1 requested, among other things, that the Radiological Sampling Stations identified in Section 4.4 of the Environmental Technical Specifications be amended. As agreed upon by the District, Reference 2 issued changes to the Technical Specifications for certain items in Reference 1 but did not change the Radiological Sampling Stations requested.

As defined in Attachment 1, circumstances since the submittal of Reference 1 require that Nebraska Public Power District once again request that the Radiological Sampling Stations be amended as identified in Attachments 1 and 2. It should be noted that some of the revised pages in Attachment 2 were also revised in our Reference 1 request.

These proposed changes have been reviewed by appropriate ,

District personnel who have concluded that the changes are not '

detrimental to the health and safety of the public, nor do they '

constitute an unreviewed safety question. I l

1 Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito l May 8,1980 l Page Two  ;

Once again, the District would like to indicate disagreement with the imposition of a Class II amendment fee relative to changes in sampling station locations. These changes which have occurred on several occasions in the past are neither under the the control of the District nor the NRC. The District has previously proposed that changes to the sampling stations necessitated by factors beyond the control of the District be routinely made and subsequently reported as part of the Annual Operating Report. It is our understanding that the Commission's legal staff had objections to such action and the matter was not pursued further.

Since this alternate method for resolution of this issue has not been accepted, the District requests that the Class II fee in the amount of $1,200 submitted with Reference 1 for Sampling Station changes be refunded since that request was not acted upon.

Nebraska Public Power District also respectfully requests that the Sampling Station changes requested in Reference 1 and this submittal be either 1) routinely changed in the Environmental Technical Specifications with the next License Amendment, or

2) folded into the review of our Radiological Effluent (Appendix I)

Technical Specifications submitted in Reference 3. Payment in the amount of $4,000 was provided in Reference 3 as payment for the Class III amendment.

Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me.

In addition to three signed originals, 37 copies are also submitted for your use.

Sincerely yours, M

Jay 1. Pilant Director of Licensing and Quality Assurance JMP/jdw:bn8/1 Attachment

Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito May 8,1980 Page Three STATE OF NEBRASKA )

) ss PLATTE COUNTY )

Jay M. Pilant, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is an authorized representative of the Nebraska Public Power District, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Nebraska; that he is duly authorized to execute this request on behalf of Nebraska Public Power District; and that the statements in said application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

MA >

W M1 Pilant subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me this day of May.

% L/ M k sat NOTARY PUBLIf I

My Commission expires / [f((] .

BERESAL BOTAN. State of Estriska MARILYN R. HoHNDoRF N, bly Comm. Esp. Oct 14,1980

.