ML17334A468: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:R'iiuL i~t'v'I- | {{#Wiki_filter:R 'iiuL i~ t'v'I-GHIlAT ID u OISTHI6v I 1 S I STF i (RIOS) bCCE,SSiu!i 1;oR::~30> Pu0 'Iil DuC.I)ATt: R3/05/Q4 IvTARIZLO: ISO OOCKFT I-AC ll:50-315 Oona o C. Coolc induc) ear ro~er P) anti Uni t 1 s Inn iana 1 | ||
R 0500< 15 50-3to Dona I a C. Coo~ i~ucl ear goTTer r'I anti Iini t dE ino iana ~ VOV3 A U T il i~ A i EF | |||
R3/05/Q4 IvTARIZLO: | ~ Aul liuR nr FILI A I'Iur inoiana 4 '">chigan f:lectric (.o. | ||
ISO | ~t( LP ~ vlA ' "EFC Jr IE'. IintelOFF [LI)iTIDE i,' iv 7 g 1V, Tg, <C, '-It f i ce of buc ear Reactor 1 IT'e.-jul at i one 9 ir ec t.or bI.> Jt.C T: <es+onr1s to 'ViEC t rul e on ) GCI.Rb0 ~ re e ~ EI I ectri e -';ii i on e n t env>run dual i tication.Rignt to aaeno resp onse un t i 1riee t jnq w/1.'RC scneou I eo to r eso ve e nvlron I 1 reserved'Tua 1 i f i c ation deflclencles ~ | ||
ClSTHT'rrri1"'r C r>r.l >U4rrS CO'r TES "ECETVEr:<Trv E'l Cl. | |||
g "Tr!E: | |||
T 1 I'Lc.'TT/i-icens iET<> Suuml t ta i: E<quioinent Dua i f i ca t ion 1 | |||
TIC I L S: | |||
>I(~alii.G | |||
=<I'.C iT-" li 'i i i-0r'.r S RLi. II' fvv T CD~I<S Iv gr. dF/!.~By 1 T IP FivCL I0 Curat./'~/it 8 L I Tr. E.'~CL P ~ > upv I "i. 1C I D1~I (l 01 Ii~ I Er,W~L: LI </vu~'p 3 . lc I C 13 iI. l COL 4D E.I TR<</42/f.... Ag 'tr'R/OL UI I< | |||
rW/v' 'vv Ov 1 v'>ET,R/i) o I/ At,(< | |||
.,rv F VA Rgrvi3 LI'i)i< ,'33, "3 IL Td 5 | |||
INDIANA L, MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. BOX 18 BOWLING GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 May 20, 1983 AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 FINAL RULE ON EQUIPMENT ENVIR011MENTAL QUALIFICATION (10 CFR 50.49) | |||
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 | |||
==Dear Mr,== | ==Dear Mr,== | ||
Denton: This letter and its Attachments respond to the NRC's final rule 10 CFR 50.49,"Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants" puhlished in the Federal Register., Vol.48, No.13, dated January 21, 1983, pp.2729-2734, and to the clarification letter dated April 27, 1983 (Mr.S.A.Varga of the NRC to our Mr.J.E.Dolan).More specifically, we read 10 CFR 50.49(g)as requiring that we identify the electric equipment important to safety within the scope of the rule (that is, safety related, non-safety related, and certain post-accident monitoring equipment as defined in 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3)), and those equipment items which we believe to be already qualified, and to establish a goal of final environmental qualification not to exceed the end of the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982, or by March 31, 1985 (whichever is earlier), for those equipment items for which qualification has not yet been established. | Denton: | ||
Furthermore, the clarification letter referenced, above requested us to indicate whether our previous submittals comply with paragraphs (a)and (b)of 10 CFR 50.49, to describe the methods used to identify the non-safety related electric equipment defined by 10 CFR 50.49(b)(2), and to establish any qualification programs not previously described for such non-safety related equipment. | This letter and its Attachments respond to the NRC's final rule 10 CFR 50.49, "Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants" puhlished in the Federal Register., Vol. 48, No. 13, dated January 21, 1983, pp. 2729-2734, and to the clarification letter dated April 27, 1983 (Mr. S. A. Varga of the NRC to our Mr. J. E. Dolan). | ||
We must first note for the record that we have repeatedly attempted during the past few months to meet with the NRC staff in order to clarify and resolve the environmental qualification"deficiencies" identified in the Technical Evaluation Reports (TERs)prepared by the Franklin Research Center (FRC)under contract to the NRC (see our letter AEP:NRC:0775, dated January 24, 1983).To date, a meeting has not been scheduled so that we could achieve resolution with NRC staff on this important topic.Therefore, we reserve the right to amend this SGO5260281 830520 r'!3F<ADQCK 05000315 PDR Mr.Harold R.on | More specifically, we read 10 CFR 50.49(g) as requiring that we identify the electric equipment important to safety within the scope of the rule (that is, safety related, non-safety related, and certain post-accident monitoring equipment as defined in 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3)), and those equipment items which we believe to be already qualified, and to establish a goal of final environmental qualification not to exceed the end of the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982, or by March 31, 1985 (whichever is earlier), for those equipment items for which qualification has not yet been established. Furthermore, the clarification letter referenced, above requested us to indicate whether our previous submittals comply with paragraphs (a) and (b) of 10 CFR 50.49, to describe the methods used to identify the non-safety related electric equipment defined by 10 CFR 50.49(b)(2), and to establish any qualification programs not previously described for such non-safety related equipment. | ||
Furthermore, if as a result of other activities (either internally generated or in response to other regulatory issues, such as Generic Letter No.82-33)it is determined that additional equipment should be included within the scope of the final rule and/or it is determined that equipment items identified in Attachment 1 to this letter require upgrading, this letter will be correspondingly amended.With the above provisos, Attachm'ents 1 through 6 to this letter provide the information requested by 10 CFR 50.49(g)and the NRC clarification letter referenced above.Specifically, Attachment 1 provides a list of equipment which we presently believe to fall within the scope of the environmental qualification final rule.The Attachment provides a listing of equipment manufacturers and model/Plant item numbers, a brief description of each equipment item, Plant identification numbers, a reference to a System Component Evaluation Worksheet (SCEW)in our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal (dated June ll, 1982), and an indication regarding whether the equipment is believed to be qualified or if qualification has not yet been established. | We must first note for the record that we have repeatedly attempted during the past few months to meet with the NRC staff in order to clarify and resolve the environmental qualification "deficiencies" identified in the Technical Evaluation Reports (TERs) prepared by the Franklin Research Center (FRC) under contract to the NRC (see our letter AEP:NRC:0775, dated January 24, 1983). To date, a meeting has not been scheduled so that we could achieve resolution with NRC staff on this important topic. Therefore, we reserve the right to amend this SGO5260281 830520 r'!3F< ADQCK 05000315 PDR | ||
Not all of these equipment items (such as certain cables and cable terminations identified as a result of the NUREG-0737 reviews)have been identified in our previous submittals on environmental qualification. | |||
The equipment list in Attachment 1 references, in the case of equipment for which qualification has not yet been established, one or more of the other Attachments to this letter.Specifically, Attachment 2 discusses aging qualification required by Section 7.0 of the DOR Guidelines. | Mr. Harold R. on AEP:NRC: 0775C response until such time as we may discuss the FRC TERs with your staff and arrive at an understanding of present qualification requirements. | ||
Attachment 3 discusses those equipment items presently identified as falling under the scope of our response to Generic Letter No.82-33 (see our letter No.AEP:NRC:0773, dated April 15, 1983). | Furthermore, if as a result of other activities (either internally generated or in response to other regulatory issues, such as Generic Letter No. 82-33) it is determined that additional equipment should be included within the scope of the final rule and/or it is determined that equipment items identified in Attachment 1 to this letter require upgrading, this letter will be correspondingly amended. | ||
Mr.Harold R.~on 3 I AEP:NRC:0775C This document has been prepared following Corporate Procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned. | With the above provisos, Attachm'ents 1 through 6 to this letter provide the information requested by 10 CFR 50.49(g) and the NRC clarification letter referenced above. Specifically, Attachment 1 provides a list of equipment which we presently believe to fall within the scope of the environmental qualification final rule. The Attachment provides a listing of equipment manufacturers and model/Plant item numbers, a brief description of each equipment item, Plant identification numbers, a reference to a System Component Evaluation Worksheet (SCEW) in our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal (dated June ll, 1982), and an indication regarding whether the equipment is believed to be qualified or if qualification has not yet been established. Not all of these equipment items (such as certain cables and cable terminations identified as a result of the NUREG-0737 reviews) have been identified in our previous submittals on environmental qualification. | ||
Very truly yours, Vice President RFH/os cc: J.E.Dolan | The equipment list in Attachment 1 references, in the case of equipment for which qualification has not yet been established, one or more of the other Attachments to this letter. Specifically, Attachment 2 discusses aging qualification required by Section 7.0 of the DOR Guidelines. Attachment 3 discusses those equipment items presently identified as falling under the scope of our response to Generic Letter No. 82-33 (see our letter No. AEP:NRC:0773, dated April 15, 1983). discusses certain Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs) which will be replaced in connection with the program established to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R (see our letter No. | ||
This reference is not intended to imply that the AEP:NRC:0578B submittal, dated June 11, 1982, provides the most up-to-date qualification data.Rather, the reference is intended to provide guidance with regard to identifying those Plant systems which utilize the equipment item~(2)Identification of the D.C.Cook Plant Unit(s)in which the equipment is installed. | AEP:NRC:0692E, dated March 31, 1983). Attachment 5 discusses the test qualification program currently underway.,with regard to our containment spray pump motors manufactured by Reliance Electric. Where applicable, requests for final environmental qualification schedular extensions under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g) are included in the Attachments to this letter. | ||
(3)Equipment manufacturer(s). | Attachment 6 to this letter provides a brief description of the methods used to identify the equipment defined by 10 CFR 50.49(b). | ||
(4)Equipment model or-"Plant item number(s).'*-(5)A brief description of the equipment item.(6)Plant identification (i.e., tag)number(s). | |||
(7)An indication as to whether the equipment is qualified, or whether qualification has not yet been established. | Mr. Harold R. ~on 3 I AEP:NRC:0775C This document has been prepared following Corporate Procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned. | ||
In the latter case, an entry has been made in the table which references at least one other attachment to this letter.The referenced attachment(s) provides a description of the open item(s)and, when applicable, a request for schedular extension under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g). | Very truly yours, Vice President RFH/os cc: J. E. Dolan Columbus R. S. Hunter M. P. Alexich R. W. Jurgensen W. G. Smith, Jr. Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector at Cook Plant Bridgman | ||
e DPNALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT'CCSISCSC5~W~ | |||
UfVXT NOS.i AND 2 1 0 C F R 5'0.4'I(l) | Attachment 1 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 10 CFR 50.49( ) E ui ment List The enclosed table contains a list of those equipment items presently known to be installed at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos, 1 and 2 and which we believe to be within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3). The identified equipment items are relied on to remain functional during and following a design basis accident. | ||
EQ.U j.PgE'NT LT.5T AEP:NRCi O57+8 | For each equipment item identified, the following information is provided in the table: | ||
/ | AEP:NRC:0578B submittal System Component Evaluation Worksheet (SCEW) reference(s). This reference is not intended to imply that the AEP:NRC:0578B submittal, dated June 11, 1982, provides the most up-to-date qualification data. Rather, the reference is intended to provide guidance with regard to identifying those Plant systems which utilize the equipment item ~ | ||
(2) Identification of the D. C. Cook Plant Unit(s) in which the equipment is installed. | |||
~ | (3) Equipment manufacturer(s). | ||
(4) Equipment model or-"Plant item number(s) .'*- | |||
(5) A brief description of the equipment item. | |||
(6) Plant identification (i.e., tag) number(s). | |||
(7) An indication as to whether the equipment is qualified, or whether qualification has not yet been established. In the latter case, an entry has been made in the table which references at least one other attachment to this letter. The referenced attachment(s) provides a description of the open item(s) and, when applicable, a request for schedular extension under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g). | |||
e DPNALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT' CCSISCSC5~W~ | |||
UfVXT NOS. i AND 2 1 0 C F R 5'0.4'I(l) EQ.U j. PgE'NT LT. 5T AEP:NRCi O57+8 o. c. coog EQ.OZPH Ehl l HODEL. Eaux PLANT''D LZ -I TION S7AT" "SCEW" SHEET qN>j No(s). HANLlFACTLlRER NI.(ABER PHENT'ESCtupTXON WuVBER83 gALXFZCATrOQ NUBBER, Qg ALXFXED gpT EsTABLZSIIEO Continental %/C, "lR Cu Various Attachment 2. | |||
~mr oLC~Lle CC k Co~Uinentaf EIRO . w/c ")2 Cu Various Attach.le'en'8 C n4xg3 C 4Je CC3 General Electric, +3I RO +/c, "e. Various Attoc hment 2. | |||
c ..C Cu I hnac. Ja "3IRO S/C "lz Cu Various Attachment- k | |||
~troffCagb CC5 1 Q of Continenta I 3IRI 7/C. Ik Cu Various Amocl ~en'. | |||
Ccwtro~a~f CC4, General Electric 3I 2 I 7/C IR Cu Vwioqs Attac4nen.t 2. | |||
~tvo] Coal CC7 Continental "3IM. IR/C ~~lk Cu Various Attachr ent Coi.tfof Co,ble General Electric n/C "Ia. Cu Var ious Attac,k~ent ~ | |||
Co~e~f 41k Cc 'I C ~tinental 3l 3.3 ls/c '2. Cu Various Attac4nenh c Co~yy~l c ale CCXO Cacnev al Electric 3I k 3 l5'/C l2. Cu Various Attachment X | |||
~ant.r4 c bh CZ" 8".t.~ r sul<teJ "-3O64 2/C. +I6 Cu Various Attac l rien.t 2. | |||
%i~ rnstra~y.t C f Jg Rockbestos "'3o64 >/C "fa C Various httac,hyena 2 r.p~gi deny C \ fe C r 3m.;t 1) | |||
~ | |||
* m."" | |||
i Q. Sainue. l Moore "3OTS 2 sTP '"'(. Cu Ir straiggw~Cn4]g VariouS Attocl ~en.4 k, Continent.ta / +30 l5 1. STP II) Cu Various Attockinemt al. | |||
Xz-.txuwent C..l le. | |||
Boston, Ins'klan 4 3075 1 STP IQ Cu Various Attach.ine>6 Mire, instrument C f fe. | |||
AEP.-NRc.: os7e B G. cooK EeurPMEA/7 MODEL EQuzl'HEA/7 PLAer rD Q,t/I ALIT 7 "scEe" SIIEE7 D. | |||
IANZ7 NO(5'3. M ANu FACTARER NuH BER OESCRr PTXON Nues BER(S) auh LrFr CA oN rr NuHBER Q.unLx I=XED hlov'STABLT5HED era Cerro Wire L. | |||
Cable 3077. 1 STQ, X~i~ee lk Cu Calel p Various hctactepnent' Samuel Moore "3O77. 1 STQ. IG Cu Various ht tackment: | |||
K~~~en~Ca e GER.Q Continental vt PO77 i STa,"I/ Cu Various httach~en+ 2. | |||
Kal ton rnsulaacJ G I is C,X 1 i(@nial) | |||
(u.;+a.) | |||
H AVE& Penetrc Cion Feel-Ckrough Extension ACtac hmez4 K to Tnsa lacer( | |||
I C.Z 1 Z(u.;ti) H Avat- M/A Penetrafion. Fcc l AMack~en4 oI. | |||
c.zis(u.; X through Extension. | |||
c.P i Okonit;e 3TC ~Q, Cu Powev Cap e. | |||
Various hteach e>e 2 CP 3 (t/;t 1) Esse,x ~324 3Tc. "Iz Cu Various ht:tac men.'t CPi Pow~eCak I en'. | |||
C P ~ | |||
On t.'un;C 1.) i ~2 04nit;e, + 3'I'I i/c p e C | |||
: 3. Cu Various ht;tach C P C P 5'<<;ti) 1,3.~un~tk Anaconda ~RIOR 3 1/C "R hl eee~C[e. | |||
Various httackn~enh | |||
~~PPc P ~ t | |||
('-t; 1.) | |||
'e;e x3 Okoni t e '~el oa. ~ i/C "~AI | |||
~p~e~c~g~ | |||
VariouS ht;t,ackment oL | |||
~ | |||
C P 7 (I/nit: 1~2 Anac onJa 3 i/G 1o Cu Various ht:t-'achiest | |||
~~ec~al J c.p~ (u.;c1> Essex "3I <<~ 3 1/C 10 Cu Various Attachment 2. | |||
~PLee C Llo CPg (inta Keriae, 3llb- 3 1/c "10 C< Various hCt'a>k~e t; L o o t -two ~P~re C Q c p i 0 (u;,t 1) ~3I03- '/C "% nl httachinen,t. 2. | |||
CP1 1 eo '.I -'el. | |||
Anaconcta Keritc 3I3.7 5 Pow5~~ | |||
1/c 4 | |||
2 Cg Various Various hht ac4ien6 Po~e~Cnb Jg c P ik(u'ci) Cyprus ~~B+7 . 3 Z/c "2 Cu Varioct S Attack>~e) t 2.' | |||
: c. p + (u.;c a.) Povler ( able | |||
"7 AF P )NRC - 057'6B D. C. C00K EQ.OXPMEAIT iQODFL ~ EGAXPH EN 7 l'LANT Xl7 e.W r FXCA7 ron/ 5TATas "SCEWn SHEET nNZT NO(Q. MAWFACTHRE% tNH8ER DeSC RI;PTZON AIIIrrtBERCS) RM A LIFZCA7rojtj NHt'1 BEE 6 WALXFXED goT E5'7ABLZS]IED cv is(u.;tQ Anaconda 3+7 3 1/C "a. Cu Various Attachment 2. | |||
CP5 n t2 C.j: 11 Boston Znoulake~ "30-l7 Xnstruwcnt VRYIONS nttacl,ment CZ 1 % | |||
~i ycl R ew 3I I I R6 C+a 1.1 Atu Tric X Various Abbacl ~en+ R, I. 4~e CZ 1+ Continenta I 304g 1.IC Ik Cu VariouS A ttachmen,d | |||
~nota ~~+XsL 3 TC ''I k C Various Attac ment 2. | |||
CPA. | |||
CF'7 Cyprus Cyprus, "3loZ | |||
~~~ | |||
31/C. "Z 1 | |||
nI VariouS P PtD1 Conn< Cor p. 4-kv Electrical VariouS Attachment 2. | |||
c,~.tin ~ | |||
EP OoL Cona.x, Corp. EP-> TI rough 600-v an) Below VcY ious Attachment EP-10 electric I QeStingt ~1Se. TBOP Fan Motors IIV-CEQ.-X Attachment uL- r E~L l- 2. QestinghousC, Ilylrogev oR-1 Attach.nugent o I X 1 X1$ X1'3 (II it M 764 Lot1 D;Aerent al BLP- IIO) 111)112) | |||
Q; ITT Bar tort. H 164 Lot 3. Pre.ssur e 120>12I> 12'> | |||
z1>xR>%13) r1g Q- t2.) TronStni tter 130> I 31> 13 2) A tatoL e t 1+0) I%I ) I+2. | |||
N FC I IO> ill> 12'kl | |||
>130) 131) 14 0,i+I gJJ~~~~I5 ~154 | |||
* 3 (un t Q FoXhoro EI30N- Di Per cntia l FFC-3.los.II) 220 A+tacgrne~C k T 4 {Mnit k) IlsAfll(IAGA) Pressure, H.l ) <<30) 331> | |||
2 X 4(u.it 1. Foxbcro NE I 3-Orl- II- DiAerev.tial F Fg 210) 23.0) | |||
X 5Glnit 2) X- Ml-D Pressure 230>240 At+ackment 3- | |||
~ | |||
TYan'twitter | |||
AEPI NRCI 057% 8 D. C. C,oox. EaIAr PROEM r HODEL . EGQXPHEAIT PLANT XD Q.HALzr-xcnrzohl sTArus "SCOW" SHZey lANZT h/0 (.5). t"1hNW FAC URER NMMBER DESC RXPTXOIV NHM BER(S ) Q.Ail LXFZCATXOhl NMH BER Q.H ALEFXED YoT ESTABLXSIILD | |||
~- | |||
TX I.(u;,tD FO>>I borO EIIGIA- Pressure MPP 2IO>>All>220~ | |||
Z 1 5'uit 2) IISACI (Hch) Ti.ansmi++er 22t,a30,23I, Abtack>>net>>4 oI. | |||
~I issuer ~ho X 1.9>>X3.0) X21>> MPP- l5'I I52 X23. X>3 XR4 rTT Barton '>>I765 Lot1 Pressure. l53 hot cL~ent- 2 (II.;t s); x~o, H 7f.3 Lo" 2. Tr ns UPS- IXI ling.>> | |||
X21 T22)223> I53 | |||
~a~'xze..&-' | |||
XR5>> ZXL>> 227 H- E- Sost>> an. II%34 9 or Res>>stance. g T P- llo>> III >> I2o, (I,I;t 1); X2@, or RoSelnoanh l74 KI->> . Te>> peratc re. I2I > isO> l3 I> AtCack>>nant k, X>7 (u.;t a) ReSpectIVely DeteetOr llo>>I+I>klo> | |||
2II 2M>2%I> | |||
89o>> k3I >240> | |||
II.E. Sost>> an. II9OI 5 Resistance NTR-Ilo> i2O> | |||
or RoseInount KS>> | |||
or'74 1 e~ perature 130>> H.O) 2IO>> Attack>>nen.b + | |||
Res ec>>ivel Detector >>>>~O~>>>>0 RA L51 1 k p EA 1%0 Li~t Ski to I Li>> I t switches $ 44acl ~en.t R | |||
<or hlRV-15 I >> | |||
MR | |||
'Pest>>ng house 5%osz Pion>> Ho Col P P-050>> | |||
> p 5'009 II > PP-oRG>> | |||
op'I- 24 R,e>>ance Frame Pa>>n p | |||
Hotol- PP- oo9 An.acl I~el t ~ | |||
"5%l.oZ ~Co,cb~~e nt 2oG-3%I- Sole,no i 3 X.S0-2'I l,x9a A&CO RRYM Valve 2'I 3>> R'I4>> At.t,acl ~en', | |||
205> klan~ | |||
gP- 'b3l O'-, Solewoi A /50- I2>>Q. I> | |||
S11, >> 517 > | |||
Asc. 0 ~wv,. V lve l3,I >> I 22>> I23>> Attacli>>nent k, | |||
'Iv/g'o>- 450-32.0 I2+ I2.5> IRG, I+7 M.0> | |||
503 > 505'> | |||
507 | |||
AF P: AIRC: 05'7'i5 8 o. c cooK | |||
~ EeurPMERlr HoDEL Eaur PMEhl T PLAMT ZD G.H LrrZCA rou S7AYuS | |||
'SCElv" SllEET Hhlx7 bio(50. HANAFACTHRER, NuMBER pFcC RrPTXoh/ NuzSER.(S) e.u ALz rscAmr ohl Nara DER Q.L<ALxFx ED NO7 EST/I BLZSHED Tci ~ | |||
TC2.~ C..e" l C.l,le J men4 ot Tc.S ~ TC+~ 1 ~ | |||
2 N/A Nl4 Ter v inatiov A t, N/A Abaca TC 10 T'C 11, Valve Operator T'c, 12 c A&ac TC.Gq TX3) N A hf A solid Rapt'on. | |||
T'P i spliced 7'o | |||
&t:randed K pea Inside Ho J - Hp TC7, Tr4-> Str e K AMac )n,end 2 TPot pt'oli.e.l C.ble h~ | |||
T.';.Id Flood- l<p Ter>>inal riel cable splice hl/A Rt Ter>>inat;>on- A//A Att:ac(.penh 2. | |||
Atear Valve Actual:ov- Or Cable Ter>>i~son hl/1 lib Terminal At+.acgvnent ot. | |||
T'C 17 Cosa'. | |||
AlAMCO Sw>t J L | |||
Cable flttacl rie~5 0 TZ1,, rzq hl/A | |||
-Lll~ | |||
Ter>>inatio~ | |||
Barrio~ Xnstru~ent hl A AtCgckvnen5 ot C~n hl ll:=, Connection- To Attac4~enb ot Y'Z:5'3 1o Al A )'< Fo<boro Xnstr~- Attachment cu~spJ'%is+ | |||
xns~rn>>ew5 Field hl/W Cable Splice To fieCackmene k. | |||
t'enetral io v Feed <1 ro~L Wive | |||
AEP:NRC: os7 b B D. C. CoOK EauXPHEHT Vor EL EauXPMENT PLAINT XD Q.MALXFXC T Oh/ 5TATHS "SCE<v" &IIEET HtJTT goCs) MANHFncTQRER IUQMBER DEscRZPTToh/ IlIHH'BER(53 sMALLFzcnTxoM MurlBER., . aHALZFXED Nol- ESTABLXSIIED T P3, TP5, M/A IV/A Te.ruination Motors> | |||
A5 nba'ackmen8 TPG E, Valve. | |||
Fa~ Motors> | |||
A>>d IlyJvoelem Poiv er Ca LIE'. | |||
N/A Terwi>>atio>>. A6 Ace cl ei,e Q SI16- I > Valve Var)ous V1> V3. V4- Li~ieor~ue, SMB-oo> Motor l.'S< O;A:ere.e Attacgsmen+ | |||
vS,VQ,V7, Sr( S-Q.> . O~erators Ta~ rju~bers) v'f)Vio V 1x > | |||
SMB-OoO P.aye,4.n "3'+ ~Cab II e. | |||
Various 4&acLI e,~e 2 N/n Brai4 ReIt. <3ov4 Rc II 0 Various heeack~eI.t, 2. | |||
Cab Rayche.~ "3II 2 R.c II Au Various s 4tt;aCkI ieu,0 2 C hie | |||
~ | |||
BraD R.ea ~3I I 2 RGi II AH Var iou s 4tgac,h~~en+ | |||
Branh Rex + 305/ II.C~ | |||
~b 5"I B/H Various Attahment 2. | |||
4 RayJwew~ R.C 51 a(v, Vav ious attach>>en 4 Ca eje AEP Design. E- Ca'hie Tevmi>>a.- | |||
Cona)c Corp. +ion. a4 RM 5 Attract ~e~t 2. | |||
ZMe~<<~x,+ | |||
Calque Ters i~- | |||
AEP Design 0- III/A tion. oct Cl arete N/A Aaeacl. e~e 2 Conan Covg Conver4ev. | |||
(ncou'tic r"Ion.- | |||
'to ug 7(g+ > l3iFCeren.tia l ALA-3Io XTT Bar +ov 7 6+ . Vressur e NLE - I I 0>IRO>I AteackweIi4 9 Trans~ittrs III>IXI>I 3 I > | |||
3II>3'>3%I | |||
Y AEP:hlRG- 05'7%8 C. COOK EG.UXPH EN T HoDEL- EQHEPHENT PLAAIT'D A,MALXFZCATXON STATUS | |||
'SCEN(' | |||
AIOI"1 BEF'.H EE7 urvXT NO(sk rahrvu FncTl4RER hfMMBER, DE5CRXPTrON NOH BER(S) glAQFZED Allh LXf'SCAT'Eohl AloT E&7ABLXSIIED N/h T~rgeC Rock. 79AB-007 So jenoig Ac<a~< tl50 Okf>>ORZ>> AekacL.niente 3 Corps lhe,Valve O23>>OR4) | |||
OQ) 04k) | |||
~0.3 o + | |||
N Techno ops for ZOO>> 5O'l Ag Pcous&ic a ve Q,R- lo7 A>> | |||
/L Energy>> aR74) . Flow Monitorin) lo78>> lo7D) 'lbbackment Endevco (via TEC) 22.73 AM I >> Syskew Co~t on- lo7 6 o2&6-3< | |||
V i c.h or ee.n- %77-I '- Rt"1S DeCeccor VRQ - l3 l 0>> | |||
141 0 CQni 5i) Anzac.L~ene 3 VrA- Z3IO>> | |||
24)o~l)g~ | |||
Nh Eber ine, Ogl- @Ca. Rr~S Detector V RS - I 0 I>> | |||
1 1>O1(u .e X) Alt ach,~en.L 3 V R.S- 2 I 0 I) awol& eR) | |||
Noge: Plal,g "gee~ IVuw4rS Are, Xv 5o~e CaSeS) | |||
I'resen4ecf Xns+eaoC Of Ho Jel Nui~i)ev g 0 | |||
Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 in Qualification In Attachment 7 to the AEP:NRC:0578B submittal dated June 11, 1982, we committed to perform an aging analysis and to establish a surveillance/maintenance/replacement program (based on the results of the aging analysis) for equipment installed in a potentially harsh environment and within the scope of IE Bulletin No. 79-01B. To this end, we have contracted the serv'es of EDS Nuclear, Inc., to perform the aging analysis and, after review of D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant surveillance and maintenance procedures, to propose the necessary changes to these procedures so that a surveillance/maintenance/ | |||
replacement program will be established to bring the Plant into compliance with Section 7.0 of the DOR Guidelines (Enclosure 4 to IE Bulletin No. 79-01B, transmitted via letter dated January 16, 1980, J. | |||
G. Keppler to J. E. Dolan). | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.49(g), we note that the schedule for final environmental qualification of equipment items should, whenever possible, establish a goal of qualification by the end of the second refueling outage after Harch 31, 1982, or by Harch 31, 1985, whichever is earlier. The applicable dates for the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 are approximately September 1, 1983, and April 1, 1984, | |||
,rgspectively, based on recent. estimates of refueling outage schedules.. | |||
At present, we do not know how many Plant surveillance and maintenance procedures will have to be revised as a result of the aging analysis findings. It is presently anticipated; however, that the aging analysis and input to be used in the revision of the surveillance and maintenance procedures will be completed by EDS Nuclear, Inc., on or before August 31, 1983. A complete revision to the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant surveillance and maintenance procedures and the establishment of the surveillance/maintenance/replacement program will be completed by November 30, 1985. | |||
Therefore, under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g), we hereby request a schedular extension to November 30, 1985 for the establishment of a surveillance/maintenance/replacement program at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant. This request for extension applies to all those equipment items identified in Attachment 1 to this letter for which "Attachment 2" has been entered in the "Qualification Not Established" column. | |||
Attachment 3 to AFP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Generic Letter 82-33 and Regulatory Guide 1.97 (Rev. 2) | |||
E ui ment Items Attachment 1 to this letter identifies certain equipment items for which "Attachment 3" has been entered in the "Qualification Not Established" column. The equipment items so identified are currently being reviewed in light of the guidance contained in Regulatory Guide 1.97, Revision 2, and under the requirements of Generic Letter 82-33 (which provides for incorporation of this review into the integrated program established by NUREG-0737, Supplement 1). | |||
As committed to by our letter AEP:NRC:0773, dated April'15, 1983, we will provide the NRC staff with a review and replacement schedule (if any) six (6) months following implementation of new Emergency Operating Procedures. Until such time as these tasks are completed and the qualification test reports are received and reviewed for acceptability, a final schedule for qualification cannot be developed. | |||
The replacement schedule (if any) will, however, consider procurement lead times, test complications, installation problems, etc. | |||
Therefore, in accordance witn the provisions oz 10 CFR 50.49 (g), | |||
a request for schedular extension of final qualification to Novembe" 30, 1985, is hereby made. for those equipment items identified as relating to Generic Letter 82-33, Supple'.ent i to NUREG-0737, and Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.97, This request for schedular extension applies to both Units of the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant. | |||
Furthermore, if (as a result of these reviews) additional equipment i,tems are ident'fied as being within the scope of the final rule and/or that equipment presently identified in Attachment 1 to this letter requires upgrading, this submittal will be amended. | |||
Attachment 4 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 RTD Re lacement The H. E. Sostman Model 811901B and Rosemount Model /I'176KS Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs) identified in our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal (see the System Component Evaluation Vorksheet, "SCEN" Z28) are being replaced in connection with the program established to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R. As noted in our letter AEP:NRC:0692E, dated Harch 31, 1983, completion of this task is scheduled for August 1985. | |||
Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g), a schedular extension to September 1, 1985, is hereby requested for final qualification of the RTDs identified above. This request is applicable to both Units of the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant. | |||
Attachment 5 to AEF:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Reliance Pump a~fotor Qualif'ication An engineering review has been conducted to ascertain the environmental qualification for the Reliance Electric containment spray pump motor, in order to determine if this motor is qualified to perform its safety function in the radiation environment outside containment (following a LOCA inside containment). | |||
Although the engineering review indicates that the pump motor will perform satisfactorily, the motor manufacturer has offered to perform a radiation test on a motorette built in the same fashion and with the same materials as those of the installed D. C. Cook Plant motor. The test is not yet complete. Reliance Electric has, however, informed us that test results will be available prior to Augus" 31, 1983. As such, a request for schedular extension is not being requested at this time. | |||
Attachment 6 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Hethods Used To Identify 10 CFR 50.49(b) E uio, ent As required by 10 CFR 50.49(g), Attachment 1 to this letter contains a list of those equipment items presently known to be within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3). The identified equipment items are relied upon to remain functional during and following a design basis accident. | |||
The actions taken to develop this list consisted of those initial actions performed for our AEP;NRC:0578B submittal (as described in to that submittal), review of NUREG-0737 requirements regarding environmental qualif'cation, and reconfirmation of postulated environments by review of the appropriate FSAR sections. | |||
For each device identified as being relied upon to remain functional (i.e., pump and fan motors, solenoids, hydrogen recombiners, valve motor operators, etc.), the corresponding electrical installation which would have to w'thstand the harsh environment (i.e., cables, cable terminations, limit switches, etc.) was identified. These electrical installations have been incorporated into the equipment list in Attachment 1 to this letter. | |||
,To date, our review of- elqctrical installations serving .safety or non-safety related actuating or monitoring devices has been limited to those devices which have been identified as falling within the scope of IE Bulletin No. 79-01B or 10 CFR 50.49(b)(l) through (b)(3).}} | |||
Attachment 6 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.1 and 2 Hethods Used To Identify 10 CFR 50.49(b)E uio, ent As required by 10 CFR 50.49(g), Attachment 1 to this letter contains a list of those equipment items presently known to be within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3).The identified equipment items are relied upon to remain functional during and following a design basis accident.The actions taken to develop this list consisted of those initial actions performed for our AEP;NRC:0578B submittal (as described in | |||
These electrical installations have been incorporated into the equipment list in Attachment 1 to this letter.,To date, our review of-elqctrical installations serving.safety or non-safety related actuating or monitoring devices has been limited to those devices which have been identified as falling within the scope of IE Bulletin No.79-01B or 10 CFR 50.49(b)(l) through (b)(3).}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:59, 4 February 2020
| ML17334A468 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 05/20/1983 |
| From: | Hering R INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| AEP:NRC:0775C, AEP:NRC:775C, NUDOCS 8305260281 | |
| Download: ML17334A468 (21) | |
Text
R 'iiuL i~ t'v'I-GHIlAT ID u OISTHI6v I 1 S I STF i (RIOS) bCCE,SSiu!i 1;oR::~30> Pu0 'Iil DuC.I)ATt: R3/05/Q4 IvTARIZLO: ISO OOCKFT I-AC ll:50-315 Oona o C. Coolc induc) ear ro~er P) anti Uni t 1 s Inn iana 1
R 0500< 15 50-3to Dona I a C. Coo~ i~ucl ear goTTer r'I anti Iini t dE ino iana ~ VOV3 A U T il i~ A i EF
~ Aul liuR nr FILI A I'Iur inoiana 4 '">chigan f:lectric (.o.
~t( LP ~ vlA ' "EFC Jr IE'. IintelOFF [LI)iTIDE i,' iv 7 g 1V, Tg, <C, '-It f i ce of buc ear Reactor 1 IT'e.-jul at i one 9 ir ec t.or bI.> Jt.C T: <es+onr1s to 'ViEC t rul e on ) GCI.Rb0 ~ re e ~ EI I ectri e -';ii i on e n t env>run dual i tication.Rignt to aaeno resp onse un t i 1riee t jnq w/1.'RC scneou I eo to r eso ve e nvlron I 1 reserved'Tua 1 i f i c ation deflclencles ~
ClSTHT'rrri1"'r C r>r.l >U4rrS CO'r TES "ECETVEr:<Trv E'l Cl.
g "Tr!E:
T 1 I'Lc.'TT/i-icens iET<> Suuml t ta i: E<quioinent Dua i f i ca t ion 1
TIC I L S:
>I(~alii.G
=<I'.C iT-" li 'i i i-0r'.r S RLi. II' fvv T CD~I upv I "i. 1C I D1~I (l 01 Ii~ I Er,W~L: LI </vu~'p 3 . lc I C 13 iI. l COL 4D E.I TR<</42/f.... Ag 'tr'R/OL UI I<
rW/v' 'vv Ov 1 v'>ET,R/i) o I/ At,(<
.,rv F VA Rgrvi3 LI'i)i< ,'33, "3 IL Td 5
INDIANA L, MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. BOX 18 BOWLING GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 May 20, 1983 AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 FINAL RULE ON EQUIPMENT ENVIR011MENTAL QUALIFICATION (10 CFR 50.49)
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr,
Denton:
This letter and its Attachments respond to the NRC's final rule 10 CFR 50.49, "Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants" puhlished in the Federal Register., Vol. 48, No. 13, dated January 21, 1983, pp. 2729-2734, and to the clarification letter dated April 27, 1983 (Mr. S. A. Varga of the NRC to our Mr. J. E. Dolan).
More specifically, we read 10 CFR 50.49(g) as requiring that we identify the electric equipment important to safety within the scope of the rule (that is, safety related, non-safety related, and certain post-accident monitoring equipment as defined in 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3)), and those equipment items which we believe to be already qualified, and to establish a goal of final environmental qualification not to exceed the end of the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982, or by March 31, 1985 (whichever is earlier), for those equipment items for which qualification has not yet been established. Furthermore, the clarification letter referenced, above requested us to indicate whether our previous submittals comply with paragraphs (a) and (b) of 10 CFR 50.49, to describe the methods used to identify the non-safety related electric equipment defined by 10 CFR 50.49(b)(2), and to establish any qualification programs not previously described for such non-safety related equipment.
We must first note for the record that we have repeatedly attempted during the past few months to meet with the NRC staff in order to clarify and resolve the environmental qualification "deficiencies" identified in the Technical Evaluation Reports (TERs) prepared by the Franklin Research Center (FRC) under contract to the NRC (see our letter AEP:NRC:0775, dated January 24, 1983). To date, a meeting has not been scheduled so that we could achieve resolution with NRC staff on this important topic. Therefore, we reserve the right to amend this SGO5260281 830520 r'!3F< ADQCK 05000315 PDR
Mr. Harold R. on AEP:NRC: 0775C response until such time as we may discuss the FRC TERs with your staff and arrive at an understanding of present qualification requirements.
Furthermore, if as a result of other activities (either internally generated or in response to other regulatory issues, such as Generic Letter No. 82-33) it is determined that additional equipment should be included within the scope of the final rule and/or it is determined that equipment items identified in Attachment 1 to this letter require upgrading, this letter will be correspondingly amended.
With the above provisos, Attachm'ents 1 through 6 to this letter provide the information requested by 10 CFR 50.49(g) and the NRC clarification letter referenced above. Specifically, Attachment 1 provides a list of equipment which we presently believe to fall within the scope of the environmental qualification final rule. The Attachment provides a listing of equipment manufacturers and model/Plant item numbers, a brief description of each equipment item, Plant identification numbers, a reference to a System Component Evaluation Worksheet (SCEW) in our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal (dated June ll, 1982), and an indication regarding whether the equipment is believed to be qualified or if qualification has not yet been established. Not all of these equipment items (such as certain cables and cable terminations identified as a result of the NUREG-0737 reviews) have been identified in our previous submittals on environmental qualification.
The equipment list in Attachment 1 references, in the case of equipment for which qualification has not yet been established, one or more of the other Attachments to this letter. Specifically, Attachment 2 discusses aging qualification required by Section 7.0 of the DOR Guidelines. Attachment 3 discusses those equipment items presently identified as falling under the scope of our response to Generic Letter No. 82-33 (see our letter No. AEP:NRC:0773, dated April 15, 1983). discusses certain Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs) which will be replaced in connection with the program established to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R (see our letter No.
AEP:NRC:0692E, dated March 31, 1983). Attachment 5 discusses the test qualification program currently underway.,with regard to our containment spray pump motors manufactured by Reliance Electric. Where applicable, requests for final environmental qualification schedular extensions under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g) are included in the Attachments to this letter.
Attachment 6 to this letter provides a brief description of the methods used to identify the equipment defined by 10 CFR 50.49(b).
Mr. Harold R. ~on 3 I AEP:NRC:0775C This document has been prepared following Corporate Procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
Very truly yours, Vice President RFH/os cc: J. E. Dolan Columbus R. S. Hunter M. P. Alexich R. W. Jurgensen W. G. Smith, Jr. Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector at Cook Plant Bridgman
Attachment 1 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 10 CFR 50.49( ) E ui ment List The enclosed table contains a list of those equipment items presently known to be installed at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos, 1 and 2 and which we believe to be within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3). The identified equipment items are relied on to remain functional during and following a design basis accident.
For each equipment item identified, the following information is provided in the table:
AEP:NRC:0578B submittal System Component Evaluation Worksheet (SCEW) reference(s). This reference is not intended to imply that the AEP:NRC:0578B submittal, dated June 11, 1982, provides the most up-to-date qualification data. Rather, the reference is intended to provide guidance with regard to identifying those Plant systems which utilize the equipment item ~
(2) Identification of the D. C. Cook Plant Unit(s) in which the equipment is installed.
(3) Equipment manufacturer(s).
(4) Equipment model or-"Plant item number(s) .'*-
(5) A brief description of the equipment item.
(6) Plant identification (i.e., tag) number(s).
(7) An indication as to whether the equipment is qualified, or whether qualification has not yet been established. In the latter case, an entry has been made in the table which references at least one other attachment to this letter. The referenced attachment(s) provides a description of the open item(s) and, when applicable, a request for schedular extension under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g).
e DPNALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT' CCSISCSC5~W~
UfVXT NOS. i AND 2 1 0 C F R 5'0.4'I(l) EQ.U j. PgE'NT LT. 5T AEP:NRCi O57+8 o. c. coog EQ.OZPH Ehl l HODEL. Eaux PLANTD LZ -I TION S7AT" "SCEW" SHEET qN>j No(s). HANLlFACTLlRER NI.(ABER PHENT'ESCtupTXON WuVBER83 gALXFZCATrOQ NUBBER, Qg ALXFXED gpT EsTABLZSIIEO Continental %/C, "lR Cu Various Attachment 2.
~mr oLC~Lle CC k Co~Uinentaf EIRO . w/c ")2 Cu Various Attach.le'en'8 C n4xg3 C 4Je CC3 General Electric, +3I RO +/c, "e. Various Attoc hment 2.
c ..C Cu I hnac. Ja "3IRO S/C "lz Cu Various Attachment- k
~troffCagb CC5 1 Q of Continenta I 3IRI 7/C. Ik Cu Various Amocl ~en'.
Ccwtro~a~f CC4, General Electric 3I 2 I 7/C IR Cu Vwioqs Attac4nen.t 2.
~tvo] Coal CC7 Continental "3IM. IR/C ~~lk Cu Various Attachr ent Coi.tfof Co,ble General Electric n/C "Ia. Cu Var ious Attac,k~ent ~
Co~e~f 41k Cc 'I C ~tinental 3l 3.3 ls/c '2. Cu Various Attac4nenh c Co~yy~l c ale CCXO Cacnev al Electric 3I k 3 l5'/C l2. Cu Various Attachment X
~ant.r4 c bh CZ" 8".t.~ r sul<teJ "-3O64 2/C. +I6 Cu Various Attac l rien.t 2.
%i~ rnstra~y.t C f Jg Rockbestos "'3o64 >/C "fa C Various httac,hyena 2 r.p~gi deny C \ fe C r 3m.;t 1)
~
- m.""
i Q. Sainue. l Moore "3OTS 2 sTP '"'(. Cu Ir straiggw~Cn4]g VariouS Attocl ~en.4 k, Continent.ta / +30 l5 1. STP II) Cu Various Attockinemt al.
Xz-.txuwent C..l le.
Boston, Ins'klan 4 3075 1 STP IQ Cu Various Attach.ine>6 Mire, instrument C f fe.
AEP.-NRc.: os7e B G. cooK EeurPMEA/7 MODEL EQuzl'HEA/7 PLAer rD Q,t/I ALIT 7 "scEe" SIIEE7 D.
IANZ7 NO(5'3. M ANu FACTARER NuH BER OESCRr PTXON Nues BER(S) auh LrFr CA oN rr NuHBER Q.unLx I=XED hlov'STABLT5HED era Cerro Wire L.
Cable 3077. 1 STQ, X~i~ee lk Cu Calel p Various hctactepnent' Samuel Moore "3O77. 1 STQ. IG Cu Various ht tackment:
K~~~en~Ca e GER.Q Continental vt PO77 i STa,"I/ Cu Various httach~en+ 2.
Kal ton rnsulaacJ G I is C,X 1 i(@nial)
(u.;+a.)
H AVE& Penetrc Cion Feel-Ckrough Extension ACtac hmez4 K to Tnsa lacer(
I C.Z 1 Z(u.;ti) H Avat- M/A Penetrafion. Fcc l AMack~en4 oI.
c.zis(u.; X through Extension.
c.P i Okonit;e 3TC ~Q, Cu Powev Cap e.
Various hteach e>e 2 CP 3 (t/;t 1) Esse,x ~324 3Tc. "Iz Cu Various ht:tac men.'t CPi Pow~eCak I en'.
C P ~
On t.'un;C 1.) i ~2 04nit;e, + 3'I'I i/c p e C
- 3. Cu Various ht;tach C P C P 5'<<;ti) 1,3.~un~tk Anaconda ~RIOR 3 1/C "R hl eee~C[e.
Various httackn~enh
~~PPc P ~ t
('-t; 1.)
'e;e x3 Okoni t e '~el oa. ~ i/C "~AI
~p~e~c~g~
VariouS ht;t,ackment oL
~
C P 7 (I/nit: 1~2 Anac onJa 3 i/G 1o Cu Various ht:t-'achiest
~~ec~al J c.p~ (u.;c1> Essex "3I <<~ 3 1/C 10 Cu Various Attachment 2.
~PLee C Llo CPg (inta Keriae, 3llb- 3 1/c "10 C< Various hCt'a>k~e t; L o o t -two ~P~re C Q c p i 0 (u;,t 1) ~3I03- '/C "% nl httachinen,t. 2.
CP1 1 eo '.I -'el.
Anaconcta Keritc 3I3.7 5 Pow5~~
1/c 4
2 Cg Various Various hht ac4ien6 Po~e~Cnb Jg c P ik(u'ci) Cyprus ~~B+7 . 3 Z/c "2 Cu Varioct S Attack>~e) t 2.'
- c. p + (u.;c a.) Povler ( able
"7 AF P )NRC - 057'6B D. C. C00K EQ.OXPMEAIT iQODFL ~ EGAXPH EN 7 l'LANT Xl7 e.W r FXCA7 ron/ 5TATas "SCEWn SHEET nNZT NO(Q. MAWFACTHRE% tNH8ER DeSC RI;PTZON AIIIrrtBERCS) RM A LIFZCA7rojtj NHt'1 BEE 6 WALXFXED goT E5'7ABLZS]IED cv is(u.;tQ Anaconda 3+7 3 1/C "a. Cu Various Attachment 2.
CP5 n t2 C.j: 11 Boston Znoulake~ "30-l7 Xnstruwcnt VRYIONS nttacl,ment CZ 1 %
~i ycl R ew 3I I I R6 C+a 1.1 Atu Tric X Various Abbacl ~en+ R, I. 4~e CZ 1+ Continenta I 304g 1.IC Ik Cu VariouS A ttachmen,d
~nota ~~+XsL 3 TC I k C Various Attac ment 2.
CPA.
CF'7 Cyprus Cyprus, "3loZ
~~~
31/C. "Z 1
nI VariouS P PtD1 Conn< Cor p. 4-kv Electrical VariouS Attachment 2.
c,~.tin ~
EP OoL Cona.x, Corp. EP-> TI rough 600-v an) Below VcY ious Attachment EP-10 electric I QeStingt ~1Se. TBOP Fan Motors IIV-CEQ.-X Attachment uL- r E~L l- 2. QestinghousC, Ilylrogev oR-1 Attach.nugent o I X 1 X1$ X1'3 (II it M 764 Lot1 D;Aerent al BLP- IIO) 111)112)
Q; ITT Bar tort. H 164 Lot 3. Pre.ssur e 120>12I> 12'>
z1>xR>%13) r1g Q- t2.) TronStni tter 130> I 31> 13 2) A tatoL e t 1+0) I%I ) I+2.
N FC I IO> ill> 12'kl
>130) 131) 14 0,i+I gJJ~~~~I5 ~154
- 3 (un t Q FoXhoro EI30N- Di Per cntia l FFC-3.los.II) 220 A+tacgrne~C k T 4 {Mnit k) IlsAfll(IAGA) Pressure, H.l ) <<30) 331>
2 X 4(u.it 1. Foxbcro NE I 3-Orl- II- DiAerev.tial F Fg 210) 23.0)
X 5Glnit 2) X- Ml-D Pressure 230>240 At+ackment 3-
~
TYan'twitter
AEPI NRCI 057% 8 D. C. C,oox. EaIAr PROEM r HODEL . EGQXPHEAIT PLANT XD Q.HALzr-xcnrzohl sTArus "SCOW" SHZey lANZT h/0 (.5). t"1hNW FAC URER NMMBER DESC RXPTXOIV NHM BER(S ) Q.Ail LXFZCATXOhl NMH BER Q.H ALEFXED YoT ESTABLXSIILD
~-
TX I.(u;,tD FO>>I borO EIIGIA- Pressure MPP 2IO>>All>220~
Z 1 5'uit 2) IISACI (Hch) Ti.ansmi++er 22t,a30,23I, Abtack>>net>>4 oI.
~I issuer ~ho X 1.9>>X3.0) X21>> MPP- l5'I I52 X23. X>3 XR4 rTT Barton '>>I765 Lot1 Pressure. l53 hot cL~ent- 2 (II.;t s); x~o, H 7f.3 Lo" 2. Tr ns UPS- IXI ling.>>
X21 T22)223> I53
~a~'xze..&-'
XR5>> ZXL>> 227 H- E- Sost>> an. II%34 9 or Res>>stance. g T P- llo>> III >> I2o, (I,I;t 1); X2@, or RoSelnoanh l74 KI->> . Te>> peratc re. I2I > isO> l3 I> AtCack>>nant k, X>7 (u.;t a) ReSpectIVely DeteetOr llo>>I+I>klo>
2II 2M>2%I>
89o>> k3I >240>
II.E. Sost>> an. II9OI 5 Resistance NTR-Ilo> i2O>
or RoseInount KS>>
or'74 1 e~ perature 130>> H.O) 2IO>> Attack>>nen.b +
Res ec>>ivel Detector >>>>~O~>>>>0 RA L51 1 k p EA 1%0 Li~t Ski to I Li>> I t switches $ 44acl ~en.t R
<or hlRV-15 I >>
'Pest>>ng house 5%osz Pion>> Ho Col P P-050>>
> p 5'009 II > PP-oRG>>
op'I- 24 R,e>>ance Frame Pa>>n p
Hotol- PP- oo9 An.acl I~el t ~
"5%l.oZ ~Co,cb~~e nt 2oG-3%I- Sole,no i 3 X.S0-2'I l,x9a A&CO RRYM Valve 2'I 3>> R'I4>> At.t,acl ~en',
205> klan~
gP- 'b3l O'-, Solewoi A /50- I2>>Q. I>
S11, >> 517 >
Asc. 0 ~wv,. V lve l3,I >> I 22>> I23>> Attacli>>nent k,
'Iv/g'o>- 450-32.0 I2+ I2.5> IRG, I+7 M.0>
503 > 505'>
507
AF P: AIRC: 05'7'i5 8 o. c cooK
~ EeurPMERlr HoDEL Eaur PMEhl T PLAMT ZD G.H LrrZCA rou S7AYuS
'SCElv" SllEET Hhlx7 bio(50. HANAFACTHRER, NuMBER pFcC RrPTXoh/ NuzSER.(S) e.u ALz rscAmr ohl Nara DER Q.L<ALxFx ED NO7 EST/I BLZSHED Tci ~
TC2.~ C..e" l C.l,le J men4 ot Tc.S ~ TC+~ 1 ~
2 N/A Nl4 Ter v inatiov A t, N/A Abaca TC 10 T'C 11, Valve Operator T'c, 12 c A&ac TC.Gq TX3) N A hf A solid Rapt'on.
T'P i spliced 7'o
&t:randed K pea Inside Ho J - Hp TC7, Tr4-> Str e K AMac )n,end 2 TPot pt'oli.e.l C.ble h~
T.';.Id Flood- l
>inal riel cable splice hl/A Rt Ter>>inat;>on- A//A Att:ac(.penh 2. Atear Valve Actual:ov- Or Cable Ter>>i~son hl/1 lib Terminal At+.acgvnent ot. T'C 17 Cosa'. AlAMCO Sw>t J L Cable flttacl rie~5 0 TZ1,, rzq hl/A -Lll~ Ter>>inatio~ Barrio~ Xnstru~ent hl A AtCgckvnen5 ot C~n hl ll:=, Connection- To Attac4~enb ot Y'Z:5'3 1o Al A )'< Fo<boro Xnstr~- Attachment cu~spJ'%is+ xns~rn>>ew5 Field hl/W Cable Splice To fieCackmene k. t'enetral io v Feed <1 ro~L Wive AEP:NRC: os7 b B D. C. CoOK EauXPHEHT Vor EL EauXPMENT PLAINT XD Q.MALXFXC T Oh/ 5TATHS "SCE<v" &IIEET HtJTT goCs) MANHFncTQRER IUQMBER DEscRZPTToh/ IlIHH'BER(53 sMALLFzcnTxoM MurlBER., . aHALZFXED Nol- ESTABLXSIIED T P3, TP5, M/A IV/A Te.ruination Motors> A5 nba'ackmen8 TPG E, Valve. Fa~ Motors> A>>d IlyJvoelem Poiv er Ca LIE'. N/A Terwi>>atio>>. A6 Ace cl ei,e Q SI16- I > Valve Var)ous V1> V3. V4- Li~ieor~ue, SMB-oo> Motor l.'S< O;A:ere.e Attacgsmen+ vS,VQ,V7, Sr( S-Q.> . O~erators Ta~ rju~bers) v'f)Vio V 1x > SMB-OoO P.aye,4.n "3'+ ~Cab II e. Various 4&acLI e,~e 2 N/n Brai4 ReIt. <3ov4 Rc II 0 Various heeack~eI.t, 2. Cab Rayche.~ "3II 2 R.c II Au Various s 4tt;aCkI ieu,0 2 C hie ~ BraD R.ea ~3I I 2 RGi II AH Var iou s 4tgac,h~~en+ Branh Rex + 305/ II.C~ ~b 5"I B/H Various Attahment 2. 4 RayJwew~ R.C 51 a(v, Vav ious attach>>en 4 Ca eje AEP Design. E- Ca'hie Tevmi>>a.- Cona)c Corp. +ion. a4 RM 5 Attract ~e~t 2. ZMe~<<~x,+ Calque Ters i~- AEP Design 0- III/A tion. oct Cl arete N/A Aaeacl. e~e 2 Conan Covg Conver4ev. (ncou'tic r"Ion.- 'to ug 7(g+ > l3iFCeren.tia l ALA-3Io XTT Bar +ov 7 6+ . Vressur e NLE - I I 0>IRO>I AteackweIi4 9 Trans~ittrs III>IXI>I 3 I > 3II>3'>3%I Y AEP:hlRG- 05'7%8 C. COOK EG.UXPH EN T HoDEL- EQHEPHENT PLAAIT'D A,MALXFZCATXON STATUS 'SCEN(' AIOI"1 BEF'.H EE7 urvXT NO(sk rahrvu FncTl4RER hfMMBER, DE5CRXPTrON NOH BER(S) glAQFZED Allh LXf'SCAT'Eohl AloT E&7ABLXSIIED N/h T~rgeC Rock. 79AB-007 So jenoig Ac<a~< tl50 Okf>>ORZ>> AekacL.niente 3 Corps lhe,Valve O23>>OR4) OQ) 04k) ~0.3 o + N Techno ops for ZOO>> 5O'l Ag Pcous&ic a ve Q,R- lo7 A>> /L Energy>> aR74) . Flow Monitorin) lo78>> lo7D) 'lbbackment Endevco (via TEC) 22.73 AM I >> Syskew Co~t on- lo7 6 o2&6-3< V i c.h or ee.n- %77-I '- Rt"1S DeCeccor VRQ - l3 l 0>> 141 0 CQni 5i) Anzac.L~ene 3 VrA- Z3IO>> 24)o~l)g~ Nh Eber ine, Ogl- @Ca. Rr~S Detector V RS - I 0 I>> 1 1>O1(u .e X) Alt ach,~en.L 3 V R.S- 2 I 0 I) awol& eR) Noge: Plal,g "gee~ IVuw4rS Are, Xv 5o~e CaSeS) I'resen4ecf Xns+eaoC Of Ho Jel Nui~i)ev g 0 Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 in Qualification In Attachment 7 to the AEP:NRC:0578B submittal dated June 11, 1982, we committed to perform an aging analysis and to establish a surveillance/maintenance/replacement program (based on the results of the aging analysis) for equipment installed in a potentially harsh environment and within the scope of IE Bulletin No.79-01B. To this end, we have contracted the serv'es of EDS Nuclear, Inc., to perform the aging analysis and, after review of D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant surveillance and maintenance procedures, to propose the necessary changes to these procedures so that a surveillance/maintenance/ replacement program will be established to bring the Plant into compliance with Section 7.0 of the DOR Guidelines (Enclosure 4 to IE Bulletin No.79-01B, transmitted via letter dated January 16, 1980, J. G. Keppler to J. E. Dolan). In accordance with 10 CFR 50.49(g), we note that the schedule for final environmental qualification of equipment items should, whenever possible, establish a goal of qualification by the end of the second refueling outage after Harch 31, 1982, or by Harch 31, 1985, whichever is earlier. The applicable dates for the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 are approximately September 1, 1983, and April 1, 1984, ,rgspectively, based on recent. estimates of refueling outage schedules.. At present, we do not know how many Plant surveillance and maintenance procedures will have to be revised as a result of the aging analysis findings. It is presently anticipated; however, that the aging analysis and input to be used in the revision of the surveillance and maintenance procedures will be completed by EDS Nuclear, Inc., on or before August 31, 1983. A complete revision to the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant surveillance and maintenance procedures and the establishment of the surveillance/maintenance/replacement program will be completed by November 30, 1985. Therefore, under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g), we hereby request a schedular extension to November 30, 1985 for the establishment of a surveillance/maintenance/replacement program at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant. This request for extension applies to all those equipment items identified in Attachment 1 to this letter for which "Attachment 2" has been entered in the "Qualification Not Established" column. Attachment 3 to AFP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Generic Letter 82-33 and Regulatory Guide 1.97 (Rev. 2) E ui ment Items Attachment 1 to this letter identifies certain equipment items for which "Attachment 3" has been entered in the "Qualification Not Established" column. The equipment items so identified are currently being reviewed in light of the guidance contained in Regulatory Guide 1.97, Revision 2, and under the requirements of Generic Letter 82-33 (which provides for incorporation of this review into the integrated program established by NUREG-0737, Supplement 1). As committed to by our letter AEP:NRC:0773, dated April'15, 1983, we will provide the NRC staff with a review and replacement schedule (if any) six (6) months following implementation of new Emergency Operating Procedures. Until such time as these tasks are completed and the qualification test reports are received and reviewed for acceptability, a final schedule for qualification cannot be developed. The replacement schedule (if any) will, however, consider procurement lead times, test complications, installation problems, etc. Therefore, in accordance witn the provisions oz 10 CFR 50.49 (g), a request for schedular extension of final qualification to Novembe" 30, 1985, is hereby made. for those equipment items identified as relating to Generic Letter 82-33, Supple'.ent i to NUREG-0737, and Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.97, This request for schedular extension applies to both Units of the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant. Furthermore, if (as a result of these reviews) additional equipment i,tems are ident'fied as being within the scope of the final rule and/or that equipment presently identified in Attachment 1 to this letter requires upgrading, this submittal will be amended. Attachment 4 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 RTD Re lacement The H. E. Sostman Model 811901B and Rosemount Model /I'176KS Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs) identified in our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal (see the System Component Evaluation Vorksheet, "SCEN" Z28) are being replaced in connection with the program established to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R. As noted in our letter AEP:NRC:0692E, dated Harch 31, 1983, completion of this task is scheduled for August 1985. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.49(g), a schedular extension to September 1, 1985, is hereby requested for final qualification of the RTDs identified above. This request is applicable to both Units of the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant. Attachment 5 to AEF:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Reliance Pump a~fotor Qualif'ication An engineering review has been conducted to ascertain the environmental qualification for the Reliance Electric containment spray pump motor, in order to determine if this motor is qualified to perform its safety function in the radiation environment outside containment (following a LOCA inside containment). Although the engineering review indicates that the pump motor will perform satisfactorily, the motor manufacturer has offered to perform a radiation test on a motorette built in the same fashion and with the same materials as those of the installed D. C. Cook Plant motor. The test is not yet complete. Reliance Electric has, however, informed us that test results will be available prior to Augus" 31, 1983. As such, a request for schedular extension is not being requested at this time. Attachment 6 to AEP:NRC:0775C Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Hethods Used To Identify 10 CFR 50.49(b) E uio, ent As required by 10 CFR 50.49(g), Attachment 1 to this letter contains a list of those equipment items presently known to be within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1) through (b)(3). The identified equipment items are relied upon to remain functional during and following a design basis accident. The actions taken to develop this list consisted of those initial actions performed for our AEP;NRC:0578B submittal (as described in to that submittal), review of NUREG-0737 requirements regarding environmental qualif'cation, and reconfirmation of postulated environments by review of the appropriate FSAR sections. For each device identified as being relied upon to remain functional (i.e., pump and fan motors, solenoids, hydrogen recombiners, valve motor operators, etc.), the corresponding electrical installation which would have to w'thstand the harsh environment (i.e., cables, cable terminations, limit switches, etc.) was identified. These electrical installations have been incorporated into the equipment list in Attachment 1 to this letter. ,To date, our review of- elqctrical installations serving .safety or non-safety related actuating or monitoring devices has been limited to those devices which have been identified as falling within the scope of IE Bulletin No.79-01B or 10 CFR 50.49(b)(l) through (b)(3).