ML17328A632

Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 90-01, NRC Regulatory Impact Survey. Util Ack Recommendation by NUMARC

ML17328A632
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	03/30/1990
From:	Alexich M INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NR:1122, GL-90-01, GL-90-1, NUDOCS 9004090015
Download: ML17328A632 (13)

Text

ACCELERATED DRIBUTION DEMON~TION ASIRM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RXDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9004090015 DOC.DATE: 90/03/30 NOTARXZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana S 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit, 2, Indiana 6 05000316 "

AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (fo'rmerly Indiana 6 Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATXON Document Control Branch (Document Control. Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to Generic Ltr 90-01, "NRC Regulatory Impact Survey."

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPXES RECEIVED LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution NOTES RECIPIENT coPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA 1 1 PD3-1 PD 1 1 GIITTER,J. 5 5 INTERNAL: NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DST 8E2 1

1 1

1 NRR/DOEA/OTS B1 1 NRR/DST/SELB 8 D 1,.

1 1

1 D

NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1

1 1

1 0

1

~~LLE~ 1 1 ~

0 1

EXTERNAL LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1, 1 NSIC 1 1 R

D S

)

A NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS; PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASIH CONTACT THE. DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISIRIBUTION LISIS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDl TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 21 ENCL 19

~, ' ~ =~"~ k

~ ~

f

~ k I'1 r J t' T.

(

~ C>

indiana Michigan Power Company P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:1122 GL 90-01 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 90-01'RC REGULATORY IMPACT SURVEY, GENERIC LETTER 90-01 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Attn: T. E. Murley March 30, 1990

Dear Dr. Murley:

We have elected to participate in the NRC Regulatory Impact Survey as requested in Generic Letter (GL) 90-01. Our responses to the survey are contained in the attachment.

It should be noted that we have only responded to inspection, audits or evaluations, imposed on us and conducted by an outside agency.

This policy was recommended by the additional clarification information provided to us by the Nuclear Management and Resource Council (NUMARC). We also note that this additional guidance was not received until February 20, 1990, which is the reason for our later than desired March 1, 1990, submittal date.

We are pleased to participate in this survey or any other program to enhance the overall safe operation of nuclear power plants in general. The number of manhours we have attributed to each activity is as realistic as possible but only a rough estimate given that we do not normally document individual manhours expended on inspection or audit activities.

Sincerely, M. P. Ale ich Vice President ldp Attachment 900409001 5'00330 PDR AGOCK 05000315 PDC

~e

~ ~

Dr. T. E. Murley AEP:NRC:1122 cc: D. H. Uilliams, Jr.

A. A. Blind - Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff A. B. Davis - Region III NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman NFEM Section Chief

~ ~ ~ ~

ATTACHMENT TO AEP:NRC:1122

~ ~ I'

~ ~

~ NRC Re ulator Im act Surve uest onna re eet NRc REsxDENTs, REGIQNAL AND

l. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

HEAD UARTE SPECTIONS SPECIAL

2. 8ased on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted'PPRoxIMATEIY FIvE INsP THE RESIDENT'S INSEPCTIONS ARE ONTINUOUS WITH MONTH Y I ISSUED'.

Operations/Construction areas covered: ALL AREAs QF PLANT QPERATIoNs.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) Two REsIDENT INSPECTORS CONTXNUOUS, OTHERS ARE ONE TO FOUR INSPECTORS 'FOR'TWO TO FIVE DAYS PER INSPECTION.

P. App 1 ~fMANHOURS tltl ( ill> tittt following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, in response to the activity described in Item fl.

and a.

b~

Plant Oepartment Plant manage<< ~j Heads ~~ (number involved)

(includes assistant plant managers)

~

c. Corporate Department Heads 26'> (number involved)

d. Corp'orate Vice Presidents 44 (number involved)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer eo 6 Man.agers 6 supervisors 1060 (number involved) 13

v NRC Re ulator Im act Surve uest onna re eet Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? APPRoxIMATELY Two PER

3. Operations/Construction areas covered: APPENDIx R sAFE sHUTDowN PRocEDUREs, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAIP UALIFICATION HEALTH PHYSICS 'EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES, AND PLANT MAINTENANCE.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) APPRoxIMATELY FIVE TO EIGHT INSPECTORS FOR ONE TO TWO WEEKS.

5, APP 1 ~ MANHOURS ft 1 th 1 1P 11 hthth following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, in response to the activity described in Item Pl.

a. Plant Oepartment Heads sve 1

(number involved) and

b. Plant ~anager J>~includes . assistant plant managers)

C ~ Corporate Oepartment Heads 12 (number involved) 3 Corporate Vice Presidents 121 (number involved)

e. Chief Nuclear Officer ao

f. Managers & Supervisors 912 (number involved) 10

NRC Re ulator Im act Surve uestsonna re eet

1. of inspection, audit or evaluation: INPQ ANNUAL EvALUATIoN Type

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted'.

Operations/Construction areas covered: ALL AREAs oF pLANT opERATIQNs, MAINTENANCE, AND .TECHNICAL SUPPORT. OPERATOR AND TECHNICAL STAFF TRAINING.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

TWENTY-FIVE EVALUATORS FOR TWO WEEKS.

5. APP 1

~ MANHOURS 1 t1 in response to the activity described in Item 81.

a. Plant Department Heads. >>2 1 (

following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, (number 15 1 involved) 5 hi

~

5th and

b. plant Manager 266 (includes assistant plant managers)

c. Corporate Department Heads vo (number involved)

d. Corpbrate Vice Presidents 164 (number involved) 4

e. Chief Nuclear Officer ss

f. Managers 6 Supervisors 3226 (uumter involved) 22

~ '8 4

\

re e r ~

NRC Re ulator Im act Surve uest onna re eet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted'wzcE PER YEAR.

3. Operations/Construction areas covered: FIRE PRQTEcTIoN AND ALL AREAs OF PLANT OPERATION.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

INSPECTORS FOR FOUR TO FIVE DAYS.

h. hhh a.

t ~ MANHOURS Plant Department f

Heads

~p 1 te ( t h following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, in response to the activity described in Item 81.

(number t t involved) ht s

h th and b.

c.

Plant Manager ~(includes Corporate Department Heads ~ assistant plant managers)

(number involved) i i

Corp orate V'ice Presidents

~

d. is (number involved)

e. Chief Nuclear Dfficer f Man.agers e Supervisors (number involved)

v e l ea S% \

e ee NRC Re ulator Im act Surve uest onna re eet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Go ERNMENTAL (i.e., LocAL STATE r EPA r EMERGENCY PLAN EXERC SEI ~ ~

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? coNTINUoUs -'EN To FIF

3. Operations/Construction areas covered: EMERGENGY PLANs AND ExERcIsEs OSHAf BOILER INSPECTIONS r RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYf ETC. THIS XS A CATCH-ALL"CATEGORY.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

DEPENDING ON THE SPECIFIC ACTXVXTY.

P. Ppp i t ~MANHOURQ ft 1 t (

in response to the activity described in Item 81.

a. Plant Department Heads'number 1

following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, h t involved) i ht h th and

b. Plant Manager 157 (inoludea a'Seieuanu Plant managerS)

C ~ Corporate Department Heads 15 (number involved) 2

d. Corp'orate Vice Presidents loa (number involved) 1

e. Chief Nuclear Officer eo f Man.agers s supervisors 995 (num)per involved) 12

fjf C

'v W~

I II