ML17328A389

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Performance Data Sheets for Plant fitness-for-duty Program for Period Jan-June 1990,per 10CFR26.Encl Includes Statistics on Various Categories of Testing,Substances Tested for & cut-off Levels Used
ML17328A389
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/15/1990
From: Blind A
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9008270021
Download: ML17328A389 (8)


Text

ACCELERATED DI -RIBUTION DE)MONST TION SYSTEM 4, e% ~,

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9008270021 DOC.DATE: 90/08/15 NOTARXZED: NO DOCKET FACXL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power )Plant, Unit 1, Indiana & 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power !Plant, Unit 2, Indiana & 05000316 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BLIND,A.A. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards performance data sheets for plant fitness for duty program for period Jan-June 1990,per 10CFR26.

DISTRXBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPXES RECIPIENT COPXES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA 1 1 PD3-1 PD 1 1 COLBURN,T. 2 2 INTERNAL: NRR/DET/ECMB 9H 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OTS B11 1 1 NRR/DST 8E2 1 1 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OC/~B 1 0 OGC/HDS1 1 0 G FILE 1 1 I

RES/DS R/EI B 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 l

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR) NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED'TTR j'q

~, ENCL l7

Indiana Michigan Power Company

~

~ 9 Cook Nuclear Plant One Cook Place Bridgmad, Ml 49106 6164655901 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 10 CFR Part 26, Fitness for Duty Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 ATTN: T. E. Murley August 15, 1990

Dear Dr. Murley:

In compliance with 10 CFR 26.71(d), Fitness for Duty Programs, this submittal represents the Donald C. Cook Plant Fitness for Duty Program performance data for the six month period from January 1, 1990, to June 30, 1990. Attached are performance data sheets that include statistics on the various categories of testing, the substances tested for, the cut-off levels used, and the average work force popu~ions during the reporting period. In addition, we have included a brief summary of management actions and a summary of the one event reported in accordance with 10 CFR 26.73.

These documents have been prepared following Corporate procedures that incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure their accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.

A. A. Blind cc: M. P. Alexich D. H. Williams, Jr.

R. C. Callen NFEM Section Chief G. Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector Bridgman A. B. Davis 900815 p568 9008270021 PDR P

. ADOCK 05000315 PDC yooi X/I

0 I

~

/ k l

ll gk

E

~

V

'FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM Performance Data

~'ersonnel Subject to 10CFR 26 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY June 30, 1990 COMPANY 6 MONTHS ENDING DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT LOCATION Louis J. Bruno / Walter M. Hod e 616 465-5901 CONTACT NAME PHONE (INCLUDE AREA CODE)

CUTOFFS: SCREEN/CONFIRMATION (ng/ml) APPENDIX A TO 10CFR 26 MARIJUANA 50 / 15 AMPHETAMINES 1000 / 500 300/ 300 COCAINE / 150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25/ 25 BARBI 300/ 300 OPIATES / 300 ALCOHOL (% BAC) ~ 04 LONG-TERM SHORT-TERM CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL AVERAGE NUMBER WITH UNESCORTED 925 1048 ACCESS

¹ ¹

¹ ¹ REFERRED ACCESS ¹ ¹ CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE PRE-EMPLOYMENT 31 PRE-BADGING 113 1048 17 PERIODIC FOR CAUSE 14 POST ACCIDENT RANDOM 609 594 FOLLOW-UP OTHER TOTAL 759 1663 24 7/21/69

RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS

~ INDIVIDUALS "jESTED 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993

¹ POSITIVE

¹ TESTED 1203

% POSITIVE .004%

GRAPH OF

% POSITIVE CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES 13 Total MARIJUANA 6 850 ng COCAINE OPIATES AMPHETAMINES PHENCYCU DINE ALCOHOL. 13 BARBITURATES BENZODIAZEPINES 7/21/89

~ ~ 1 Indiana Michigan Power Company Cook Nuclear Plant One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106 616 465 5901 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 10 CFR Part 26, FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:

1. From the onset of the Cook Plant FFD Program it was decided to treat violations involving alcohol no differently thanidentified any other FFD violation. As a result of this approach we have several cases where the individual involved was in dire need of treatment.
2. The Cook Plant has made available to its contractor personnel the same Employee Assistance Program offered to its company employees.

This has helped to gain the support of contractor management as well as their workers. Use of these EAP services also provides for consistency in assessment and'reatment for all persons involved in our program.

3. A recent rise in the number of "for cause" incidents has spurred management to schedule meetings with individual contractor management personnel. In addition, an "in service" FFD seminar is scheduled to focus on the issue of "for cause" incidents.
4. Quarterly meetings are held to bring together the program administrators, the MRO, the Laboratory Services personnel, and the collection site personnel to discuss the state of the program and any issues or incidents of mutual interest. These meetings have resulted in changes that have significantly enhanced the overall program.
5. Quarterly meetings are also held w'th the Cook Plant Employee Assistance Program providers. These meetings are held to discuss the statistics on program utilization, aftercare services, and any problems or special cases that occurred during the quarter.
6. After a recent tragic accident that occurred at the plant, the EAP mobilized a team to offer "Critical Incident Stress Management".

This team was available at the plant on four days following the accident offering counselling to those needing assistance to cope with the tragedy.

FITNESS FOR rY

SUMMARY

REPORT NAME: S.H. 781638 JOB: ENGINEER IHG TECHNOLOGIST DEPARTMENT: TPS - R P.

FFD INCIDENT AND DATE:

The employee was randomly selected for FFD testing on February 26, 1990. On March 1, 1990, the Human Resources Supervisor was informed by the program M.R.O. that this individual needed a FFD clinical exam. The Human Resources Supervisor surunoned the individual, apprised him of the situation, and per our policy, referred him to our M.R.O. The individual refused discussion with the M.R.O. stating that it might "incriminate him". He was suspended and his access revoked, pending further evaluation.

FOLLOW-UP ACTION TAKEN:

The TPS Superintendent and the H.R. Supervisor met with the individual on March 2, 1990. The individual was fully cooperative during the session and admitted to using marijuana on a recent vacation. He admitted that this was a recreational use and that he had not used it in quite some time. The TPS Superintendent presented the individual with the re-entry memo. On March 2, 1990, the employee was evaluated by the Company psychologist and the EAP counselor. Intensive out-patient treatment was recommended. On March 15, 1990, the employee began out-patient counseling. The EAP counselor confirmed on March 20 that the employee had begun treatment on 3/15/90.

Aftercare assessment was conducted by the Company pyschologist on 3-26-90. He was administered a re-entry drug screen on 4/2/90.

The employee was recommended for unescorted access with the condition that he attend one aftercare counseling session weekly until released by the treating professional. A reevaluation with the Company psychologist is to take place approximately 90 days after re-entry into the workforce.

FFD EXAM(S) DATE(S) RESULTS TYPE OF MONITORING PROGRAM ESTABLISHED Behavioral Random Drug Screen 2/26/90 Positive Observation and/or FFD Exam(s). Explain.

Clinical Interview 3/02/90 Abnormal after

1. Be evaluated by Company psychologist approximately 90 days Clinical Interview 3/26/90 Normal re-entry into workforce.

Drug Scfeen 4/02/90 Normal

2. Report to EAP and adhere to all recommendations.
3. Be subject to random FFD examinations for a period of 3 years.
4. Participate in aftercare meetings as outlined by the treating professional.

c v A

1 l

~ ~ (