ML19317F396: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:-
                                                 ; --                ~          ---          -    - - - --- --  -
                                                 ; --                ~          ---          -    - - - --- --  -
-
37      ,,3;              _
37      ,,3;              _
                                  .
                                                         . q                                    :p:
                                                         . q                                    :p:
                 ..*.N
                 ..*.N
     .: .      g                                . .-
     .: .      g                                . .-
                                                          -
                                                               ;
                                                               ;
                                     +
                                     +
.
9
9
                      '
                                                                       ' DUKE POWER COMPANY' OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION i
                                                                       ' DUKE POWER COMPANY'
1 Report No.: 'UE-287/75-10 Report Date: November 13, 1975
    '
              '                                    '
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION i
1
-
Report No.: 'UE-287/75-10
-
Report Date: November 13, 1975
-                        Event-Dato: . October.5, 1975 Facility: ~Oconee. Unit 3',.              Seneca,~ South Carolina                          ,
-                        Event-Dato: . October.5, 1975 Facility: ~Oconee. Unit 3',.              Seneca,~ South Carolina                          ,
'
                         'dentification'of Event: Weld failure on sample line from Low Pressure I
                         'dentification'of Event: Weld failure on sample line from Low Pressure I
'
Injection System cooler
Injection System cooler
:
                     ! Conditions Prior to Event:                      Unit at cold shutdown Description of Event:
                     ! Conditions Prior to Event:                      Unit at cold shutdown Description of Event:
,
;                        On October.5, 1975, while the'Oconee Unir 3 3A LPI train was in the decay heat removal mode,: a.1" sample line from the discharge of the 3A LPI j                        cooler separated from the LPI cooler discharge line. The 3A cooler was 4                        isolated and decay heat removal was continued with the 3B decay heat                      !
;                        On October.5, 1975, while the'Oconee Unir 3 3A LPI train was in the decay heat removal mode,: a.1" sample line from the discharge of the 3A LPI
                                                                -
j                        cooler separated from the LPI cooler discharge line. The 3A cooler was 4                        isolated and decay heat removal was continued with the 3B decay heat                      !
                     " cooler.
                     " cooler.
'
                                                                                                                    .
t
t
'
                                                                                  .
:                        Designation of' Apparent'Cause of Event:                                                  .
:                        Designation of' Apparent'Cause of Event:                                                  .
:.
This event.was.apparently caused by cavitation occurring at high flow
This event.was.apparently caused by cavitation occurring at high flow
'l                  . rates in the butterfly control valve 3LP-12 located in the cooler discharge line. This'. cavitation caused the line to vibrate excessively during                    .
'l                  . rates in the butterfly control valve 3LP-12 located in the cooler discharge line. This'. cavitation caused the line to vibrate excessively during                    .
Line 64: Line 41:
t weld: failure in the-sample line.
t weld: failure in the-sample line.
Analysis of Event:-
Analysis of Event:-
                                                                                                                    ,
This event involved the' failure of a 1" sample line while the unit was in a cold. shutdown condition. ' The redundant' LPI cooler, 3B, was not. af fected
This event involved the' failure of a 1" sample line while the unit was in
                                      '
a cold. shutdown condition. ' The redundant' LPI cooler, 3B, was not. af fected
.                        and .was operated- to provide : sufficient decay heat removal while the 3A LPI i                    :    train ~was isolated and repairs completed. It is concluded that- the health
.                        and .was operated- to provide : sufficient decay heat removal while the 3A LPI i                    :    train ~was isolated and repairs completed. It is concluded that- the health
:and safety of the public;was_unaffecter by this event.
:and safety of the public;was_unaffecter by this event.
2
2
>
                     ~ Corrective' Action:
                     ~ Corrective' Action:
,.
UThe 3A 'LPI train was isolated,ithe weld repaired, and dye penetrant testing was performed to assure systemLintegrity. In. addition, several representative welds, ' including corresponding welds in Units -I and' 2 wil1~ be dye penetrant
UThe 3A 'LPI train was isolated,ithe weld repaired, and dye penetrant testing
''
                ,
was performed to assure systemLintegrity. In. addition, several representative welds, ' including corresponding welds in Units -I and' 2 wil1~ be dye penetrant
                     , tested.' This; testing'will.be completed byLJatuary 15,;1976.
                     , tested.' This; testing'will.be completed byLJatuary 15,;1976.
.                                            .
The causative' cavitation problem:has existed in the LPI cooler discharge l
                          ,
The causative' cavitation problem:has existed in the LPI cooler discharge
_
l
                   . : lines for~allfof the.0conee units. The problem was initially experienced                        l
                   . : lines for~allfof the.0conee units. The problem was initially experienced                        l
           -        ' with . valves 1LP-12 and :-14 and 2LP.-12 ^and -14,- located in the LPI cooler
           -        ' with . valves 1LP-12 and :-14 and 2LP.-12 ^and -14,- located in the LPI cooler
                      -
                                                                                          -
,
: discharge,linesjof(Units 11;and;2,-and occurred under conditions'of low
: discharge,linesjof(Units 11;and;2,-and occurred under conditions'of low
'                                                      3
'                                                      3
                                            . .
                       .,                .I y          +
                       .,                .I
                                          -
                                                -
y          +
p        w s
p        w s
                                                                                               ~                -
                                                                                               ~                -
                                                            '
E,                              }              :y p                                                    ;
E,                              }              :y p                                                    ;


e...-.;,                              -
e...-.;,                              -
              ,
                                                                         ,m
                                                                         ,m
:,....                    ,7 e.
:,....                    ,7 e.
    -
       -- a                  .-          -
       -- a                  .-          -
_  _
coolant flow through these lines. Af ter careful review, a decision was made to replace these valves with valves of a globe body design which would eliminate
coolant flow through these lines. Af ter careful review, a decision was made to replace these valves with valves of a globe body design which would eliminate
                                   ~
                                   ~

Revision as of 07:59, 1 February 2020

Unusual Event 287/75-10:on 751005,weld Failed on Sample Line from LPIS Cooler.Caused by Cavitation at High Flow Rates in Butterfly Control Valve 3LP-12.3A LPIS Train Isolated,Weld Repaired & to Be Dye Penetrant Tested
ML19317F396
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1975
From:
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19317F388 List:
References
RO-287-75-10, NUDOCS 8001140645
Download: ML19317F396 (2)


Text

-

-- ~ --- - - - - --- -- -

37 ,,3; _

. q :p:

..*.N

.: . g . .-

+

9

' DUKE POWER COMPANY' OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION i

1 Report No.: 'UE-287/75-10 Report Date: November 13, 1975

- Event-Dato: . October.5, 1975 Facility: ~Oconee. Unit 3',. Seneca,~ South Carolina ,

'dentification'of Event: Weld failure on sample line from Low Pressure I

Injection System cooler

! Conditions Prior to Event: Unit at cold shutdown Description of Event:

On October.5, 1975, while the'Oconee Unir 3 3A LPI train was in the decay heat removal mode,
a.1" sample line from the discharge of the 3A LPI j cooler separated from the LPI cooler discharge line. The 3A cooler was 4 isolated and decay heat removal was continued with the 3B decay heat  !

" cooler.

t

Designation of' Apparent'Cause of Event: .

This event.was.apparently caused by cavitation occurring at high flow

'l . rates in the butterfly control valve 3LP-12 located in the cooler discharge line. This'. cavitation caused the line to vibrate excessively during .

operationiin the' decay heat removal mode and consequently _resulted in a i e

t weld: failure in the-sample line.

Analysis of Event:-

This event involved the' failure of a 1" sample line while the unit was in a cold. shutdown condition. ' The redundant' LPI cooler, 3B, was not. af fected

. and .was operated- to provide : sufficient decay heat removal while the 3A LPI i  : train ~was isolated and repairs completed. It is concluded that- the health

and safety of the public;was_unaffecter by this event.

2

~ Corrective' Action:

UThe 3A 'LPI train was isolated,ithe weld repaired, and dye penetrant testing was performed to assure systemLintegrity. In. addition, several representative welds, ' including corresponding welds in Units -I and' 2 wil1~ be dye penetrant

, tested.' This; testing'will.be completed byLJatuary 15,;1976.

The causative' cavitation problem:has existed in the LPI cooler discharge l

. : lines for~allfof the.0conee units. The problem was initially experienced l

- ' with . valves 1LP-12 and :-14 and 2LP.-12 ^and -14,- located in the LPI cooler

discharge,linesjof(Units 11;and;2,-and occurred under conditions'of low

' 3

., .I y +

p w s

~ -

E, } :y p  ;

e...-.;, -

,m

,.... ,7 e.

-- a .- -

coolant flow through these lines. Af ter careful review, a decision was made to replace these valves with valves of a globe body design which would eliminate

~

the cavitation problem. These valves for Units 1 and 2 were ordered in June, 1975. It was not considered that this cavitation problem would occur in Unit 2 LPI coolers since the piping arrangement differs from Units 1 and 2 and valves 3LP-12 and'-14 are of a different design, intended to alleviate the cavitation effects as experienced in Units 1 and 2. A cavitation problem was experienced with Unit 3, however, but differed from that experienced with Units 1 and 2 since it occurred at high rather than at low flow rates.

Currently, after performing a comprehensive evaluation of this incident, it has been concluded that replacement valves identical to those being procured for Units 1 and 2 are necessary to alleviate the cavitation problem in Unit 3.

The procurement of these valves is being finalized.

.