ML19317F396

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unusual Event 287/75-10:on 751005,weld Failed on Sample Line from LPIS Cooler.Caused by Cavitation at High Flow Rates in Butterfly Control Valve 3LP-12.3A LPIS Train Isolated,Weld Repaired & to Be Dye Penetrant Tested
ML19317F396
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1975
From:
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19317F388 List:
References
RO-287-75-10, NUDOCS 8001140645
Download: ML19317F396 (2)


Text

-

37

,,3;

~

..*.N

. q

p:

g 9

+

' DUKE POWER COMPANY' OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION i

1 Report No.: 'UE-287/75-10 Report Date: November 13, 1975 Event-Dato:. October.5, 1975 Facility: ~Oconee. Unit 3',. Seneca,~ South Carolina

'dentification'of Event: Weld failure on sample line from Low Pressure I

Injection System cooler

! Conditions Prior to Event:

Unit at cold shutdown Description of Event:

On October.5, 1975, while the'Oconee Unir 3 3A LPI train was in the decay heat removal mode,: a.1" sample line from the discharge of the 3A LPI j

cooler separated from the LPI cooler discharge line. The 3A cooler was isolated and decay heat removal was continued with the 3B decay heat 4

" cooler.

t Designation of' Apparent'Cause of Event:

'l This event.was.apparently caused by cavitation occurring at high flow

. rates in the butterfly control valve 3LP-12 located in the cooler discharge line.

This'. cavitation caused the line to vibrate excessively during operationiin the' decay heat removal mode and consequently _resulted in a i

weld: failure in the-sample line.

t e

Analysis of Event:-

This event involved the' failure of a 1" sample line while the unit was in a cold. shutdown condition. ' The redundant' LPI cooler, 3B, was not. af fected and.was operated-to provide : sufficient decay heat removal while the 3A LPI train ~was isolated and repairs completed.

It is concluded that-the health i

and safety of the public;was_unaffecter by this event.

2

~ Corrective' Action:

UThe 3A 'LPI train was isolated,ithe weld repaired, and dye penetrant testing was performed to assure systemLintegrity.

In. addition, several representative welds, ' including corresponding welds in Units -I and' 2 wil1~ be dye penetrant

, tested.' This; testing'will.be completed byLJatuary 15,;1976.

The causative' cavitation problem:has existed in the LPI cooler discharge

. : lines for~allfof the.0conee units. The problem was initially experienced

' with. valves 1LP-12 and :-14 and 2LP.-12 ^and -14,- located in the LPI cooler

discharge,linesjof(Units 11;and;2,-and occurred under conditions'of low 3

.I

+

w y

p s

}

y

~

E, p

e...-.;,

,m

,7 e.

-- a coolant flow through these lines. Af ter careful review, a decision was made to replace these valves with valves of a globe body design which would eliminate

~

the cavitation problem.

These valves for Units 1 and 2 were ordered in June, 1975.

It was not considered that this cavitation problem would occur in Unit 2 LPI coolers since the piping arrangement differs from Units 1 and 2 and valves 3LP-12 and'-14 are of a different design, intended to alleviate the cavitation effects as experienced in Units 1 and 2.

A cavitation problem was experienced with Unit 3, however, but differed from that experienced with Units 1 and 2 since it occurred at high rather than at low flow rates.

Currently, after performing a comprehensive evaluation of this incident, it has been concluded that replacement valves identical to those being procured for Units 1 and 2 are necessary to alleviate the cavitation problem in Unit 3.

The procurement of these valves is being finalized.

.