ML071220365: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:May 8, 2007LICENSEE:Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating CorporationFACILITY:Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1
{{#Wiki_filter:May 8, 2007 LICENSEE:       Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation FACILITY:       Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 10, 2007,BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONThe U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Wolf CreekNuclear Operating Corporation held a telephone conference call on April 10, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staff's draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staff's D-RAIs.Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of theD-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.           /RA/Verónica M. Rodríguez, Project Manager License Renewal Branch B Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-482
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 10, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation held a telephone conference call on April 10, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staffs draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
                                                  /RA/
Verónica M. Rodríguez, Project Manager License Renewal Branch B Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-482


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. List of Participants
: 1. List of Participants
: 2. List of Draft Requests for Additional Informationcc w/encls: See next page  
: 2. List of Draft Requests for Additional Information cc w/encls: See next page


ML071220365OFFICEPM:RLRB:DLRLA:DLRBC:RLRB:DLRNAMEVRodríguezSFigueroaRAuluck DATE05/4/0705/4/0705/8/07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALLWOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONLIST OF PARTICIPANTSAPRIL 10, 2007PARTICIPANTSAFFILIATIONSVeronica RodriguezU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)William KooNRC Lorrie BellWolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Eric BlocherStrategic Teaming and Resource Sharing Alliance (STARS)
ML071220365 OFFICE      PM:RLRB:DLR            LA:DLR                BC:RLRB:DLR NAME        VRodríguez            SFigueroa              RAuluck DATE        05/4/07                05/4/07                05/8/07
Paul CrawleySTARS Donald StevensSTARS  DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONWOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONAPRIL 10, 2007The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Wolf CreekNuclear Operating Corporation held a telephone conference call on April 10, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS), Unit 1, license renewal application. Nickel Alloy Aging Management ProgramD-RAI B.2.1.34-1 The Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program (AMP) was submitted prior to the performance ofpre-mitigation weld inspections for the application of weld overlays on pressurizer connections with dissimilar metal butt welds at WCGS. The pre-mitigation inspection performed in 2006 identified extensive circumferential cracking at three dissimilar metals welds associated with surge, relief, and safety nozzles. The staff requests that the applicant revise this AMP to incorporate information pertaining to the dissimilar metals butt weld inspection activities and findings. The revised AMP should:  (1) discuss program enhancements incorporated as a result of the inspections, (2) provide information regarding the mitigation and preventive actions, taken or planned, to reduce the susceptibility of Alloy 600/82/182 components to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC), (3) discuss the inspection frequency and method of inspection of components susceptible to PWSCC covered under the scope of this program, and (4) provide justification that the AMP will provide reasonable assurance that PWSCC will be detected in a timely manner.In addition, the staff requests that the applicant update the AMP summary in the UpdatedSafety Analysis Report (USAR) supplement to reflect all changes made to the program. Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI.D-RAI B.2.1.34-2 PWSCC of components made of Alloy 600/82/182 in pressurized power reactors (PWR) is anemerging material degradation issue. The industry has initiated augmented inspections and mitigation of susceptible components to ensure safe operation of the affected plants. Recent inspection findings of extensive circumferential cracking of Alloy 82/182 dissimilar metal welds at WCGS has raised concerns regarding the adequacy of the inspection scope and schedule based on industry initiatives. In addition, discussions with the industry to resolve the staff's comments and recommendations to the inspection program delineated in the Materials Reliability Program (MRP)-139, "Primary System Butt Weld Inspection and Evaluation Guideline," is continuing. Therefore, to ensure that the program is acceptable for implementation during the period of extended operation and that it will manage the effects of aging in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a)(3), the staff requests that the applicant commit to continue to participate in industry initiatives (such as the Westinghouse Owners Group and the  Electric Power Research Institute MRP). The program inspection requirements of Alloy600/82/182 components must be consistent with the latest version of the NRC accepted industry guidance, generic communications, orders, and applicable regulatory requirements delineated in 10 CFR 50.55a. In addition, the staff requests that the applicant submit the AMP inspection plan for NRC review and approval at least 24 months prior to entering the period of extended operation.Discussion: The staff recognized that the applicant's Reactor Vessel Coolant SystemSupplement commitment incorporates some of these items. However, the applicant wasinformed that the Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program commitment needs to be supplemented and kept separate from the items related to the Reactor Vessel Internals. The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.D-RAI B.2.1.34-3By letter dated October 12, 2005, the NRC staff provided comments and recommendations tothe Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) pertaining to the guidance provided in MRP-139 for the inspection and evaluation of Alloy 82/182 butt welds. This initiative is continuing and a resolution has not been reached. The staff requests that the applicant identify any exceptions that WCGS plans to take to the NRC's comments and recommendations provided to the NEI. If WCGS plans to take exceptions, the staff requests that the applicant provide its technical justification.Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI.D-RAI B.2.1.34-4By letter dated July 27, 2004, WCNOC responded to NRC Bulletin 2004-01, "Inspection of Alloy82/182/600 Materials Used in the Fabrication of Pressurizer Penetrations and Steam Space Piping Connections at Pressurized Water Reactors."  The staff requests that the applicant confirm that WCGS is not taking any exception to the guidance provided in this bulletin. If exceptions are identified, the applicant should address and justify them, especially those in the following areas: (1) percentage of inspection coverage to be achieved at each location, and (2) performance of an extent-of-condition evaluation, sample expansion, and non-destructive examinations if circumferential cracking is found. In addition, in view of the extensive PWSCC found at WCGS, the staff requests that the applicant discuss any enhancements made to the WCGS inspection plan for those components addressed in Bulletin 2004-01.Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI.D-RAI B.2.1.34-5NRC Bulletin 2003-02, "Leakage from Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations andReactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity," requested information from PWR licensees regarding the reactor coolant pressure boundary integrity associated with the reactor pressure vessel lower head penetrations. WCNOC did not discuss augmented inspection plans for these components in its response to this bulletin nor in its description of the AMP. In view of the extensive PWSCC found at WCGS, the staff requests that the applicant discussthe inspection plan for the components addressed in Bulletin 2003-02, and provide justification for its adequacy.Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI.D-RAI B.2.1.34-6The LRA states that the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure boundary, RCS non-pressureboundary, and ESF locations are included within the scope of this AMP. The staff requests that the applicant identify the components associated with these locations and its corresponding inspection plan. In addition, the staff requests that the applicant identify any Alloy 600/82/182 components not covered within the scope of this program and the reasons for their exclusion.Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI.D-RAI B.2.1.34-7The detection of aging effects program element states that this AMP utilizes various visual,surface and volumetric inspections and examination techniques for early detection of PWSCC in Alloy 600 components. However, it does not specify whether the equipment, method and personnel used for these inspections meet the ASME Code Section XI requirements. The staff requests that the applicant revise the LRA to clarify this statement. Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI.D-RAI B.2.1.34-8The monitoring and trending program element states that relative risk rankings for Alloy 600locations are included as part of this AMP. The staff requests that the applicant address how the relative risk rankings will be used in the inspection of Alloy 600/82/182 components and whether this ranking methodology was approved by the NRC. Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI. D-RAI B.2.1.34-9The corrective actions program element states that "Corrective actions may be used as trackingand documentation records for changes in plant thought processes and to identify potential improvement in programs from benchmarking activities."  The staff requests that the applicant provide details and examples to clarify this statement.


Discussion:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as aformal RAI.
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS APRIL 10, 2007 PARTICIPANTS              AFFILIATIONS Veronica Rodriguez        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Memo to Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp from V. Rodriguez dated May 08, 2007DISTRIBUTION:
William Koo                NRC Lorrie Bell                Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Eric Blocher              Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing Alliance (STARS)
Paul Crawley              STARS Donald Stevens            STARS Enclosure 1


==SUBJECT:==
DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION APRIL 10, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation held a telephone conference call on April 10, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS), Unit 1, license renewal application.
Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program D-RAI B.2.1.34-1 The Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program (AMP) was submitted prior to the performance of pre-mitigation weld inspections for the application of weld overlays on pressurizer connections with dissimilar metal butt welds at WCGS. The pre-mitigation inspection performed in 2006 identified extensive circumferential cracking at three dissimilar metals welds associated with surge, relief, and safety nozzles. The staff requests that the applicant revise this AMP to incorporate information pertaining to the dissimilar metals butt weld inspection activities and findings. The revised AMP should: (1) discuss program enhancements incorporated as a result of the inspections, (2) provide information regarding the mitigation and preventive actions, taken or planned, to reduce the susceptibility of Alloy 600/82/182 components to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC), (3) discuss the inspection frequency and method of inspection of components susceptible to PWSCC covered under the scope of this program, and (4) provide justification that the AMP will provide reasonable assurance that PWSCC will be detected in a timely manner.
In addition, the staff requests that the applicant update the AMP summary in the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) supplement to reflect all changes made to the program.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI B.2.1.34-2 PWSCC of components made of Alloy 600/82/182 in pressurized power reactors (PWR) is an emerging material degradation issue. The industry has initiated augmented inspections and mitigation of susceptible components to ensure safe operation of the affected plants. Recent inspection findings of extensive circumferential cracking of Alloy 82/182 dissimilar metal welds at WCGS has raised concerns regarding the adequacy of the inspection scope and schedule based on industry initiatives. In addition, discussions with the industry to resolve the staffs comments and recommendations to the inspection program delineated in the Materials Reliability Program (MRP)-139, Primary System Butt Weld Inspection and Evaluation Guideline, is continuing. Therefore, to ensure that the program is acceptable for implementation during the period of extended operation and that it will manage the effects of aging in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a)(3), the staff requests that the applicant commit to continue to participate in industry initiatives (such as the Westinghouse Owners Group and the Enclosure 2
 
Electric Power Research Institute MRP). The program inspection requirements of Alloy 600/82/182 components must be consistent with the latest version of the NRC accepted industry guidance, generic communications, orders, and applicable regulatory requirements delineated in 10 CFR 50.55a. In addition, the staff requests that the applicant submit the AMP inspection plan for NRC review and approval at least 24 months prior to entering the period of extended operation.
Discussion: The staff recognized that the applicants Reactor Vessel Coolant System Supplement commitment incorporates some of these items. However, the applicant was informed that the Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program commitment needs to be supplemented and kept separate from the items related to the Reactor Vessel Internals. The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI B.2.1.34-3 By letter dated October 12, 2005, the NRC staff provided comments and recommendations to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) pertaining to the guidance provided in MRP-139 for the inspection and evaluation of Alloy 82/182 butt welds. This initiative is continuing and a resolution has not been reached. The staff requests that the applicant identify any exceptions that WCGS plans to take to the NRCs comments and recommendations provided to the NEI. If WCGS plans to take exceptions, the staff requests that the applicant provide its technical justification.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI B.2.1.34-4 By letter dated July 27, 2004, WCNOC responded to NRC Bulletin 2004-01, Inspection of Alloy 82/182/600 Materials Used in the Fabrication of Pressurizer Penetrations and Steam Space Piping Connections at Pressurized Water Reactors. The staff requests that the applicant confirm that WCGS is not taking any exception to the guidance provided in this bulletin. If exceptions are identified, the applicant should address and justify them, especially those in the following areas: (1) percentage of inspection coverage to be achieved at each location, and (2) performance of an extent-of-condition evaluation, sample expansion, and non-destructive examinations if circumferential cracking is found. In addition, in view of the extensive PWSCC found at WCGS, the staff requests that the applicant discuss any enhancements made to the WCGS inspection plan for those components addressed in Bulletin 2004-01.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI B.2.1.34-5 NRC Bulletin 2003-02, Leakage from Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity, requested information from PWR licensees regarding the reactor coolant pressure boundary integrity associated with the reactor pressure vessel lower head penetrations. WCNOC did not discuss augmented inspection plans for these components in its response to this bulletin nor in its description of the AMP.


==SUMMARY==
In view of the extensive PWSCC found at WCGS, the staff requests that the applicant discuss the inspection plan for the components addressed in Bulletin 2003-02, and provide justification for its adequacy.
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 10, 2007,BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONHARD COPY DLR RF E-MAIL:PUBLICRWeisman SSmith (srs3)
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb
D-RAI B.2.1.34-6 The LRA states that the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure boundary, RCS non-pressure boundary, and ESF locations are included within the scope of this AMP. The staff requests that the applicant identify the components associated with these locations and its corresponding inspection plan. In addition, the staff requests that the applicant identify any Alloy 600/82/182 components not covered within the scope of this program and the reasons for their exclusion.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI B.2.1.34-7 The detection of aging effects program element states that this AMP utilizes various visual, surface and volumetric inspections and examination techniques for early detection of PWSCC in Alloy 600 components. However, it does not specify whether the equipment, method and personnel used for these inspections meet the ASME Code Section XI requirements. The staff requests that the applicant revise the LRA to clarify this statement.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI B.2.1.34-8 The monitoring and trending program element states that relative risk rankings for Alloy 600 locations are included as part of this AMP. The staff requests that the applicant address how the relative risk rankings will be used in the inspection of Alloy 600/82/182 components and whether this ranking methodology was approved by the NRC.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.


RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb
D-RAI B.2.1.34-9 The corrective actions program element states that Corrective actions may be used as tracking and documentation records for changes in plant thought processes and to identify potential improvement in programs from benchmarking activities. The staff requests that the applicant provide details and examples to clarify this statement.
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.


RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes
Memo to Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp from V. Rodriguez dated May 08, 2007 DISTRIBUTION:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 10, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY DLR RF E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RWeisman SSmith (srs3)
SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes
-------------
-------------
VRodriguez
VRodriguez CJacobs JDonohew GPick, RIV SCochrum, RIV CLong, RIV WKoo
 
CJacobs JDonohew GPick, RIV SCochrum, RIV CLong, RIV WKoo Wolf Creek Generating Station cc:Jay Silberg, Esq.Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC  20037Regional Administrator, Region IVU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX  76011-7005Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 311 Burlington, KS  66839Chief Engineer, Utilities DivisionKansas Corporation Commission 1500 SW Arrowhead Road Topeka, KS  66604-4027Office of the GovernorState of Kansas Topeka, KS  66612Attorney General120 S.W. 10 th Avenue, 2 nd FloorTopeka, KS  66612-1597County ClerkCoffey County Courthouse 110 South 6 th StreetBurlington, KS  66839Thomas A. Conley, Section ChiefRadiation and Asbestos Control Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310 Topeka, KS  66612-1366Vice President Operations/Plant ManagerWolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS  66839Supervisor LicensingWolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS  66839U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionResident Inspectors Office/Callaway Plant


8201 NRC Road Steedman, MO 65077-1032Kevin J. Moles, ManagerRegulatory Affairs Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839Lorrie I. Bell, Project ManagerWolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839Mr. James RossNuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708}}
Wolf Creek Generating Station cc:
Jay Silberg, Esq.                        Supervisor Licensing Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP    Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 2300 N Street, NW                        P.O. Box 411 Washington, DC 20037                    Burlington, KS 66839 Regional Administrator, Region IV        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission      Resident Inspectors Office/Callaway Plant 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400          8201 NRC Road Arlington, TX 76011-7005                Steedman, MO 65077-1032 Senior Resident Inspector                Kevin J. Moles, Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission      Regulatory Affairs P.O. Box 311                            Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Burlington, KS 66839                    P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Chief Engineer, Utilities Division Kansas Corporation Commission            Lorrie I. Bell, Project Manager 1500 SW Arrowhead Road                  Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Topeka, KS 66604-4027                    P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Office of the Governor State of Kansas                          Mr. James Ross Topeka, KS 66612                        Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Attorney General                        Washington, DC 20006-3708 120 S.W. 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS 66612-1597 County Clerk Coffey County Courthouse 110 South 6th Street Burlington, KS 66839 Thomas A. Conley, Section Chief Radiation and Asbestos Control Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310 Topeka, KS 66612-1366 Vice President Operations/Plant Manager Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839}}

Revision as of 07:47, 23 November 2019

Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on April 10, 2007, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, Concerning Draft RAIs Pertaining to the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, LRA
ML071220365
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/08/2007
From: Veronica Rodriguez
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRB
To:
Wolf Creek
Rodriguez V
References
Download: ML071220365 (10)


Text

May 8, 2007 LICENSEE: Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation FACILITY: Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 10, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation held a telephone conference call on April 10, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staffs draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

/RA/

Verónica M. Rodríguez, Project Manager License Renewal Branch B Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-482

Enclosures:

1. List of Participants
2. List of Draft Requests for Additional Information cc w/encls: See next page

ML071220365 OFFICE PM:RLRB:DLR LA:DLR BC:RLRB:DLR NAME VRodríguez SFigueroa RAuluck DATE 05/4/07 05/4/07 05/8/07

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS APRIL 10, 2007 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Veronica Rodriguez U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

William Koo NRC Lorrie Bell Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Eric Blocher Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing Alliance (STARS)

Paul Crawley STARS Donald Stevens STARS Enclosure 1

DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION APRIL 10, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation held a telephone conference call on April 10, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS), Unit 1, license renewal application.

Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program D-RAI B.2.1.34-1 The Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program (AMP) was submitted prior to the performance of pre-mitigation weld inspections for the application of weld overlays on pressurizer connections with dissimilar metal butt welds at WCGS. The pre-mitigation inspection performed in 2006 identified extensive circumferential cracking at three dissimilar metals welds associated with surge, relief, and safety nozzles. The staff requests that the applicant revise this AMP to incorporate information pertaining to the dissimilar metals butt weld inspection activities and findings. The revised AMP should: (1) discuss program enhancements incorporated as a result of the inspections, (2) provide information regarding the mitigation and preventive actions, taken or planned, to reduce the susceptibility of Alloy 600/82/182 components to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC), (3) discuss the inspection frequency and method of inspection of components susceptible to PWSCC covered under the scope of this program, and (4) provide justification that the AMP will provide reasonable assurance that PWSCC will be detected in a timely manner.

In addition, the staff requests that the applicant update the AMP summary in the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) supplement to reflect all changes made to the program.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-2 PWSCC of components made of Alloy 600/82/182 in pressurized power reactors (PWR) is an emerging material degradation issue. The industry has initiated augmented inspections and mitigation of susceptible components to ensure safe operation of the affected plants. Recent inspection findings of extensive circumferential cracking of Alloy 82/182 dissimilar metal welds at WCGS has raised concerns regarding the adequacy of the inspection scope and schedule based on industry initiatives. In addition, discussions with the industry to resolve the staffs comments and recommendations to the inspection program delineated in the Materials Reliability Program (MRP)-139, Primary System Butt Weld Inspection and Evaluation Guideline, is continuing. Therefore, to ensure that the program is acceptable for implementation during the period of extended operation and that it will manage the effects of aging in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a)(3), the staff requests that the applicant commit to continue to participate in industry initiatives (such as the Westinghouse Owners Group and the Enclosure 2

Electric Power Research Institute MRP). The program inspection requirements of Alloy 600/82/182 components must be consistent with the latest version of the NRC accepted industry guidance, generic communications, orders, and applicable regulatory requirements delineated in 10 CFR 50.55a. In addition, the staff requests that the applicant submit the AMP inspection plan for NRC review and approval at least 24 months prior to entering the period of extended operation.

Discussion: The staff recognized that the applicants Reactor Vessel Coolant System Supplement commitment incorporates some of these items. However, the applicant was informed that the Nickel Alloy Aging Management Program commitment needs to be supplemented and kept separate from the items related to the Reactor Vessel Internals. The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-3 By letter dated October 12, 2005, the NRC staff provided comments and recommendations to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) pertaining to the guidance provided in MRP-139 for the inspection and evaluation of Alloy 82/182 butt welds. This initiative is continuing and a resolution has not been reached. The staff requests that the applicant identify any exceptions that WCGS plans to take to the NRCs comments and recommendations provided to the NEI. If WCGS plans to take exceptions, the staff requests that the applicant provide its technical justification.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-4 By letter dated July 27, 2004, WCNOC responded to NRC Bulletin 2004-01, Inspection of Alloy 82/182/600 Materials Used in the Fabrication of Pressurizer Penetrations and Steam Space Piping Connections at Pressurized Water Reactors. The staff requests that the applicant confirm that WCGS is not taking any exception to the guidance provided in this bulletin. If exceptions are identified, the applicant should address and justify them, especially those in the following areas: (1) percentage of inspection coverage to be achieved at each location, and (2) performance of an extent-of-condition evaluation, sample expansion, and non-destructive examinations if circumferential cracking is found. In addition, in view of the extensive PWSCC found at WCGS, the staff requests that the applicant discuss any enhancements made to the WCGS inspection plan for those components addressed in Bulletin 2004-01.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-5 NRC Bulletin 2003-02, Leakage from Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity, requested information from PWR licensees regarding the reactor coolant pressure boundary integrity associated with the reactor pressure vessel lower head penetrations. WCNOC did not discuss augmented inspection plans for these components in its response to this bulletin nor in its description of the AMP.

In view of the extensive PWSCC found at WCGS, the staff requests that the applicant discuss the inspection plan for the components addressed in Bulletin 2003-02, and provide justification for its adequacy.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-6 The LRA states that the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure boundary, RCS non-pressure boundary, and ESF locations are included within the scope of this AMP. The staff requests that the applicant identify the components associated with these locations and its corresponding inspection plan. In addition, the staff requests that the applicant identify any Alloy 600/82/182 components not covered within the scope of this program and the reasons for their exclusion.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-7 The detection of aging effects program element states that this AMP utilizes various visual, surface and volumetric inspections and examination techniques for early detection of PWSCC in Alloy 600 components. However, it does not specify whether the equipment, method and personnel used for these inspections meet the ASME Code Section XI requirements. The staff requests that the applicant revise the LRA to clarify this statement.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-8 The monitoring and trending program element states that relative risk rankings for Alloy 600 locations are included as part of this AMP. The staff requests that the applicant address how the relative risk rankings will be used in the inspection of Alloy 600/82/182 components and whether this ranking methodology was approved by the NRC.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI B.2.1.34-9 The corrective actions program element states that Corrective actions may be used as tracking and documentation records for changes in plant thought processes and to identify potential improvement in programs from benchmarking activities. The staff requests that the applicant provide details and examples to clarify this statement.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

Memo to Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp from V. Rodriguez dated May 08, 2007 DISTRIBUTION:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON APRIL 10, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RWeisman SSmith (srs3)

SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes


VRodriguez CJacobs JDonohew GPick, RIV SCochrum, RIV CLong, RIV WKoo

Wolf Creek Generating Station cc:

Jay Silberg, Esq. Supervisor Licensing Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 2300 N Street, NW P.O. Box 411 Washington, DC 20037 Burlington, KS 66839 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office/Callaway Plant 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 8201 NRC Road Arlington, TX 76011-7005 Steedman, MO 65077-1032 Senior Resident Inspector Kevin J. Moles, Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Affairs P.O. Box 311 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Burlington, KS 66839 P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Chief Engineer, Utilities Division Kansas Corporation Commission Lorrie I. Bell, Project Manager 1500 SW Arrowhead Road Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Topeka, KS 66604-4027 P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Office of the Governor State of Kansas Mr. James Ross Topeka, KS 66612 Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Attorney General Washington, DC 20006-3708 120 S.W. 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS 66612-1597 County Clerk Coffey County Courthouse 110 South 6th Street Burlington, KS 66839 Thomas A. Conley, Section Chief Radiation and Asbestos Control Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310 Topeka, KS 66612-1366 Vice President Operations/Plant Manager Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839