IR 05000219/1987015

Insp Rept 50-219/87-15 on 870504-08.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Procurement,Receiving Operations,Storage & Preventive Maint in Storage

ML20214V087
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	05/20/1987
From:	Eapen P, Winters R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20214V068	List: IR 05000219/1987015 ML20214V066
References
50-219-87-15, NUDOCS 8706110446
Download: ML20214V087 (5)

Text

. :

.

i-U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /87-15 Docket N License N DPR-16 Licensee: GPU Nuclear Corporation Facility Name: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At: Forked River, New Jersey Inspection Dates: May 4 - 8, 1987 Inspector: I .

5Lb hI pR.W. Winters,ReactoFEngineer,DRS dath '

Approved by: . k Dr. P. K. Eapen, Chief, Quality Assurance date'

cQ ' o h7 Section, Operations Branch, DRS, RI Inspection Summary: Routine unannounced inspection on May 4-8, 1987 (Report No. 50-219/87-15)

Areas Inspected: Procurement, Receiving Operations, Storage and Preventive Maintenance in storage Results: No violations or deviations were identifie '

8706110446 870522

{DR ADOCK 05000219 PDR

-

, :

,

C 3

'

Spare Parts Engineering group has reviewed the inventory of DTO items in storage and periodically reviews the inventory of newly acquired items to determine whether PM is required. The inspector reviewed the preventive maintenance of Direct Turnover (DTO) items. All itena reviewed received PM regularly. However, as discussed in paragraph 3.0 the program for scheduling and controlling the preventive maintenance of these items had not been formally established. This unresolved remains open pending establishment of the program to control this preventive maintenanc .0 Procurement 3.1 Program Review The Operational Quality Assurance Plan, 1000-PLN-7200.01 Revision 1-00, Section 5.0 Procurement and Material Control, Procedure 6100-QAP-7204.01, revision 0.00, QA Review of Procurement Documents, and Procedure 6100-QAP-7207.01, revision 0.00, Supplier Quality Classification List were reviewed to determine whether administrative controls clearly described the following:

--

Responsibilities for initiating, revising, reviewing, and approving purchase orders are identifie Controls and responsibilities have been established for the inclusion of technical requirements and special instructions in purchase requisition Requirements for access to vendor's facilities are include Quality assurance requirements are specifie Requirements for inclusion of regulatory requirements have been addresse Requiremehts for shelf life of the products are included when necessar .2 Implementation The inspector selected purchase orders for the following items to determine whether these orders were reviewed and approved adequatel Stock Number Description 286-130-1100-1 Gasket, Body F/ Scram Inlet Valve 397-100-7100-H Kit, Rebuild ASCO No. 220-546 397-100-7400-H Kit, Rebuild ASCO No. 220-301 384-130-5900-H Indicator Pressure - 30 in. Hg to 60 in. Hg 476-591-6300-H Operator, SPD - 2 719-036-5100-1 Seal Rod MSIV, air operated 897-085-9100-1 Solenoid Valve No. 83440, Fuel Pool Main Grapple l

,

, !~

I go Purchase requisitions for replacement stock items were written to include all of the original requirements including certifications, quality assurance, technical specifications, and regulatory requirements. The inspector noted that the vendor for the pressure indicator (stock number 384-130-5900-H) notified the licensee that the indicator ordered was no longer available but was replaced by another indicator having a range from -30 in. Hg to 100 in. Hg. As a result of this change the requisition was referred to engineerin Engineering added the requirement to certify that the change did not affect the environmental certification of the indicator or the unit in which the indicator was installed. The vendor provided a certification to this effec Purchase requisitions for non stock or DT0 items were written by the organization requiring the item. These requisitions were reviewed by the engineering and quality assurance organizations to assure that all of the appropriate technical, quality assurance, certifications and regulatory requirements were included. Receipt inspection was performed in accordance with the requirements of the purchase requisition. Records were maintained to assure these items were available when needed and a procedure was being written to assure that preventive maintenance (PM) was performed on these items when required. To assure that these items were included in the preventive maintenance program engineering has reviewed the inventory list of DTO items. Warehouse personnel update this list periodically and provide the list to engineering for revie .3 Conclusions The procurement system was effectively implemented with adequate engineering and quality assurance reviews. Items requiring shelf life control or PM were clearly identified on the purchase orders for stock item DT0 items were periodically reviewed for shelf life and PM by engineerin No violations or deviations were observe .0 Receipt, Storage, and Handling 4.1 Program Review Procedures 7240-ADM-6430.01, Revision 1, Storage of Material Program, 7240-ADM-6430 .2, Revision 1, Classification of Items and Levels of Storage, 7240-ADM-6430.03, Revision 1, General Storage of Materials, and 6130-QAP7210.02, Revision 5, Receipt inspection and Material Conformance Inspection were reviewed and discussions held with licensee personnel to determine the following:

A

• ?

, Received goods are reviewed for shipping damage and quantities receive Receiving inspection verifies that the purchase requisition requirements, including revisions, have been satisfie Acceptable materials are appropriately tagged or marked for storag Items with specified shelf life are identified and shelf life is clearly indicate Nonconforming items are identified, segregated and controlled to prevent inadvertent us .2 Implementation The inspector observed that both the on site and offsite warehouses were maintained to meet the requirements of ANSI N45.2.2 Level B storage. Both were clean, free of excess debris and packaging material, and not overcrowde Receiving inspection was performed by incividuals certified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6. Inspections performed on spare or replacement parts are documented on the Receipt inspection Procedure and Reco-d form. Inspections performed on new items, DTO and engineered items are documented on a Receiving Inspection Report. In both cases predetermined attributes are specified based on the purchase requisition requirement As items are received they are clearly tagged for receiving inspection. Subsequent to the receiving inspection these tags are removed by the inspector and replaced with the appropriate release or hold tag an.1 placed in storage. The quality assurance accept tag clearly indicates the shelf life and the expiration date when required. The licensee's shelf life program lists items in the order they are receive In reviewing items requiring shelf life the inspector noted that the shelf life expiration date, for a group of components with multiple receipt dates is the expiration date of the oldest component. One valve having an expired shelf life for internal parts was clearly identified as requiring replacement of these parts prior to use. A rebuild kit with unexpired shelf life replacement parts was available for this valv Items requiring PM were conspicuously tagged to indicate the last time PM was performed and the required interval. The inspector observed the licensee extended the PM program to include non safety related items. None of the items observed were found overdue for the required PM. The PM for items in the stocking system was tracked on a computer and the PM for DT0 items was tracked manually using a card fil .

, .

1' 6 4.3 Conclusions The warehouses were maintained in an acceptable manner and they met the requirements of ANSI N45.2.2 for Level B storage. Both the shelf life and preventive maintenance programs were adequate with the items requiring PM or shelf life control identifie No violations or deviations were observe .0 Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of non-compliance, or deviations. One unresolved item was closed during this-inspection, and another was modified as discussed in paragraph .0 Management Meetings Licensee management was informed of the scope and purpose of the inspection at the entrance interview on May 4, 1987. The findings of the inspection were discussed with licensee representatives during the course of the inspection and presented to licensee management at the May 8, 1987 exit intervie At no time during the inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector. The licensee did not indicate that proprietary information was involved within the scope of this inspection, t

i i

i

(

l

!

i

!

!

.

4