ML20214Q292
| ML20214Q292 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/19/1986 |
| From: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Brons J POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8609240258 | |
| Download: ML20214Q292 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:e . September 19, 1986 Docket No. 50-286 Power Authority of the State of New York ATTN: J. C. Brons, Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation 123 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601 , Gentlemen: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received the enclosed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) memorandum dated September 17, 1986 which refers to the state of emergency preparedness around your reactor site at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station. Attached to the FEMA memorandum is their report dated September 17, 1986, entitled " Interim Finding - Indian Point," prepared by FEMA Region II. The report provides FEMA's findings on several unresolved issues in the four counties that comprise the 10-mile emergency planning zone for the Indian Point site. While progress has been made in responding to these issues, FEMA stated that they were " unable to provide reasonable assurance that the public health and safety of school children in the four-County Emergency Planning Zone at Indian 4 Point can be protected." The FEMA report goes on to state that certain addi-tional material has been submitted relative to correcting certain of the deficiencies yet this information has not been considered in the FEMA report. The NRC has not been apprised of the current status of these corrective actions. We are of the view that the unresolved issues identified by FEMA and referred to in their report must be remedied in order for the NRC to conclude that appropriate protective actions can and will be taken in the event of a radio-logical emergency at your facility. Accordingly, you are requ2sted to submit a written statement to this office within 10 days of the date of this letter, describing (1) the current status of the issues identified in FEMA's report, (2) your plans and schedules for correcting the unresolved issues, and (3) your views regarding the significance of these findings with respect to the State of Emergency Preparedness at the Indian Point site. We consider the FEMA findings to apply equally to Units 2 and 3, and suggest you coordinate your reply. This request affects fewer than ten licensees and therefore, is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (PL 96-511). Sincerely, original ~sfgne3 Ff Ihomas E. Muzieg - Dhk gg9 Thomas E. Murley Regional Administrator pg6
Enclosure:
Memorandum from FEMA dated 9/17/86 w/ Attachment 3[ p wtw
f J. C. Brons 2 cc: w/ Encl. L. W. Sinclair, President J. P. Bayne, First Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer Gerald C. Goldstein, Assistant General Counsel A. Klausmann, Vice President - Quality Assurance F. X. Pindar, Quality Assurance Superintendent G. M. Wilverding, Chairman, Safety Review Committee M. Blatt, Director, Regulatory Affairs (Con Ed) NRC Licensing Project Manager Dept. of Public Service, State of New York Public Document Room (PDR) Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) NRC Resident Inspector State of New York bcc: Region I Docket Room (w/ concurrence) Management Asst, DRMA (w/o Encl.) DRP Section Chief R. Bores, DRSS EP&RPB DRSS DRP RC CCowgill/mrf TMartin WKane JGutierrez INurley 9/ /86 9/ /86 9/ /86 9/ /86 9/ /86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
, .
- U .
301 492 7921
- 11:22 WC-TEM-f958 m, GEM 002 09/iEV86 i i
. ... . ss,= r== mm to cm a
- 2 Fedu.1 Emergency Management Agency * .
Wadiingm, D.CitM72 WP117 806) ImeAMuptItps 96sseter messed,L. assess
.Divisten af Geesgency ruggergeness and .
s D eispostag Deepense Off of .and Satosoement WWlees uti . Flums
'Atents .
Of fios of lectural ens 9tehoslegicolt Henarde prograue airpl35 9.30$ivetition en Zedian Petht IR233 cts f this la in reopense to youe memorandum et h 6.1985, repaseting a e finding and detammination ateut uhether, at the present.tiums the affaite gadiologiest:ese iand roepense plane ene Indian poise: aus adequate to anfetr.or ashasa skildsen sa thn+ent.et ..redt.1agi .. protect the heal col guergency at the site. You ask.epoolfloally etest tho' elentflaanse of e erg agasining deficiencies trith seepest to the.etdlity to tdo adeStata sThe indennotion le n asseurge to emoal childsen. - l yw in i tingethe final Disector's Decision en the.2 20fjetition a tG,14>46) filed by thoLNor Vask Public
- intmeest SINalp.(NTPINi). en l 1- these iseums ,
Attesited is the finding prepnene tiy Region 12 of the: Federal assagency nonagusant Agency (PW p h It is benedsupon unterial semitted hv the . Stats: of :now York thr.ough August it,19064 Assitional motorial centinues to to euhaltted,> including, ser smaseda, a list,et prepoemd eengen. to the i seckland County plan,: tour letters of Agreement. witn Westchester Cmnty transportation providers, etc. Also, a runoital essecies is to be . scheduled later in 1906 tenid soir. af0ect aces tenues concerned with the , protection of school children. In ecder to refloot erqr ehenges or enhance-monta incorporated in additions 1 outaittale and to report em the resalta of the runedial esercise, ese prepogra to endpoit a autiplemental finding on . this issue on recruary 1# 1987 Taking into careideration plan.semittals.and userclass sonich occurred prior to Aupant. 12, 1946; rum.is unable to provide reesonable aneurence thatithe p&lic heetth and aefety of echaal childrevi in the fout-County energoney Planniae mone at 3neient9eint een be protected. Attactement. ,, As stated
- i . . . . . . . .
And O l$ 7 A., A ' / -
~
f G.S ? l s , , h
. s, 6.54 .* - . Y, s .-p . . . . . . m m. .m m _ ...+__....,
l (September 17, ISs6)
) .
.: nis is in response to the neopter 6,1985 % feek4hmatusteer .w -
l
.: . Regulatory Connission (NBC), requesting a WFid finting't@$'dstseednetion -
',, - about whether, at the present thus, the effette resistaglook shengency reopense .
.' plans for Indian Point are adequate to Otobast ther health anti safety:of - "
C ,i.. esteel Children in the event; of a restologient eggsgensy ht*the mitee.1Bou C - '
. .. e k '
ogi specifically about the sipificence of any reemining de@&stencies with. '- 6 , ?- respect to the ability to take adequate naasures to protect, acho@ chi 1&en. r g l..a C - 1: . " - . On April 28, 1986, a draft of the Federal Duergency Managmeent 40mney's ' . i . (FDR) finding and determination on the adequacy of offeita tadiological 1
', emergency plans to protect the health and safety of school children was !
pewided to New York State. This draf t was proridad so that the State would - i
} ; have the opportunity to respond to any issues dich FDR found to be untemolsd.- i
; On May 9,1986, a meeting was held at the offices of FDR Region 11 to discuss )
- ; the status of the issues in the four counties that coprios the 10-saile f, plume EP2 for the Indian Point site. Attending the seating tsere septementatives -
I frcia the Federal Dnergency Managernent Agency Region II, NRC Regie I, New -
'. i York State, Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange Countiet) t:he Itew York * ' -
Pcwor Authority and Consolidated Edison. As a result of thig emeting, New-
. / i
. York state agreed to resolve certain issues and to provide FIph with informatiori '
7 on the latest status of resolving the remaining concerns. On July 7,1986 4 New York State submitted the following information to FDR: 3
) .l
- suspense dates for training of bus drivers:
' Propened revisions to the Rockland, Westchestar and Putnan '
e 7 ~ County plans: arz! . I
-
- Modified letters of agreement with bus providers. .;
. ./
8 -
)g his finding and determination incorporates the repults of SDR'B' May 9,1986'
) .
Joseting with the State, counties and utilities, the State's wiltten response . t , , . of July 7,1986 regarding the April 28, 1986 draft of this report. A nesting' . 3 .s was held on August 13, 1986 with the State of New York, Meetchester and
- h J'. Rockland counties. Correspondence subrr.itted as corrective action by tho'
s. [ Governor's authorized representative to FDR after the August IS geeting has i
* 'e not been reviewed for adequacy and is not reflected in the body of this
- i. report.
l
)
?
.. ?
I I' I i .
} y .
- 1 4
n
,4 .
, ,f*m t 1
. r 4
i
/.
,_.~
- 1. .
. l I
=8- ~.
r- A. Bookland County Special Issue ~ ~ Reakland county 4 s. . 1he State has in the past and aga recently, said that.there h as need .' -
- s. n' > for isttees of agreement in Ro County between the oeuntymad gehook. -
s'- .,' erpsists since the county executt has the right tos use sehpWL.fasilities .- -
- . 4 Sa ta emergency. .This position es stated in a letger, dated, gely,1,.1983'to...: ,-
; v. K uhton stated in part -
A' ' 4 - . -
'y : ....
- Askb.ALi$6L, y u .- ,
- p. stegl4 ped County soboel diste beso premised their plans !: ' ' ' ' '. -
i 4 , #' Article 2-8 of ttg6 Races 419e , w and the abl1447 of the .
. , .f (f ief Ezeoutive to use the fao1 ties during an emergenoy.: -
the Chief Ezeoutive's.
~
, .
- ir plan, therefore. is be t
, ,I . erder to open these schools as option oesters.'
$ In*4 Febrgary 20, 1986, letter to FEg, New York State again said that no i . ' . .
*! a . 1stpers of agreement are necessary, however, in this case varique sections.
of the Rookland County Charter are $ed as the basis of this position, a ,, e d. The 36ssletion of the issue is not easily sooonplished teoause of two other.' # . 1 Sew Enet Atate letters to FEMA. In'a response to FEMA 9s Junes11,:19M.
- n ., ,
! 9- latter agaseing the NYPIRO Petition of'Ep.116,19M, the State respopdeet... r t-
! j to the guestion:
[ 6. 'To what extent are school districts required by New York < p State Ezeoutive Law 2 5 to participate in radiological-
,. r. smeegency planning a redness exercises med eills, ans actual emergency ponse activities?' ; .
S '$
- Executive Law Artio3s 2-8 does pot requirg school j A.
}. distriots, or any other untes of local government, to- ,
- participate in radiologicaP.seorgency mattere.' -1 -
r
- 6 In 4 diew York State letter to rsMA ded February 12, 1986; the state said.'t. 't.t.i
; -, 1. t
. e yJ ) *We have and will continue to include local school officials '- . :
; j in our planning process bet as periously stated there is soi r. '. , . .
guarastpe that the school offiefals have to abide by a FEMA . ~ <*' .. . :
- Ou16ance Memorandum *.
i
- q t
{ . l Fu @ , the same letter states, - g c
, g . .: , r
. 'Altheqgh the guidance addresses the local powersammt - - '2. =. .
responsibility fbe coordinating.pth school offietels,- -
, . 'c j .'
- there is no asserence that school efficials wit & adopt. .
, {.. g. recommended emergency procedures,.* ,
- g-y, ,
d
,j; i -
J ,
' 4 .
[, - - -
. . .'. % 8 + , .
i t . 8, . 3 . '- ~ 7 d
$te stove quotes from various State letters to . FEMA .peist ite deer'inska. r '
The four oounty plans fhry greatly with respect 46 how this *' '- n g$ pnotes. $s approached. Some o les have signed letters of agressent,'thieb' to give the accal sut ties the . ability to.anke use .ge gehad 5. . :
! a4,y as is necessary. -
$t- C. A. , CW '-
. Ns' result of FEMA Sagion II's W $e M M WLG the4 tate,:eeunt4es' e-
- j. ..e an6 utilities FEMA's Regtenal Ceggpiderisued W Souel,y:Saecutive i e8 .- - -
; ?. i tous ED. 14 (1994) ans me. 7 (198$7: se then d amed the need ,rer.3stterm ' >i
,4 er egesoment as tiesy relate to various school lities in aamtma canaty r - . i
- . ', o the Div on of N111tary.4 Savd1 ': t
, - i Web C. Roger Lunder, geg. , - . .
., Affhire for the State of New YoMr. John Lamberski, Esq. of the New Tork
- i l Power Authority. PEMA's Regional 1 eoestancated his eenoorus'to 'the: < . )
State in a letter dated July 23,194 (copy attached) . The St$te has a e .
.'. requested a legal opinion from the 364te Attorpey General on tlpe adequeoy-5 j .cf the Rookland Coiety statute. ,
[ It has been and contiaqps to be position that letters o'F agreedent *' are required to assure the availability of necessary resourcea 'see.a$*-
~ - '
i.s . j receptden centers and transportattom equipedid. 3
; .B . Protep Actions .
Reckland County ,
, /
# i
! t.'
the attool population will be protpted by either early dismianal op ; ,
,- .gemeuntion.
J
. /. . D _Rockland County Plan (page IVe99) states that tigere are two pote$daE* * "
settone to be taken with resprd to the school populations: -
, j,.
! .* Close schools 'and have stpets At home with families pr$or i -'
g 6 to an evacuation estdar; ,
~
s t .
', If the "Go Home Policy
- Jtet the safest oeurse or agtteg'for'.1 .
d 4
'l affected schools, chi *trile tpe evacuated to predesigna6et M f. : -
i
) School Reception Centers. j- [ '
p A f a It should be noted that the Plap (Drocedure Scu.1, Sectioni5 3 2) 'e a "
! that at an Alert Emerghoy Clasg6fiention Level (gCL) or 'Orgater ~ gency' i [j - the Assistant Superintendent of Bunness and Finages of 80C88 willih a 'd 3 #g , the Administrators of sobools withiS Aookland Cotaty to-betim 'gmel Mf etverals . -
j Ti steps which are means of implement 1% the 'Go home Policy.# . De-SeeMoh - e
!- SJ,4, the provision is made ser autAbol evacuations to to dinoghed, i a.e : .
would seem reasonable to limit the 8%o Boan Policy
- to the Alert 34,'. pAar rJ j i;
! !(- i .. go of this option at higher ECLs has greater potential ter act haftsg .3
- ti t completed the "00 Base PolicF*, prior to an evacuation arder. - rk- mi i i-i y I4 y ,
,4 l 1
.]
P . . , f.
- m. a...; .n . -
, . s . ..,
, n
# ,. . #8 .
g
- _ _ _ ___:x :: _. = .
l . Ud .kr l
- j. . .
s - - i .
. 4 . .
, e4- v,'. . o.s n' o I' s., -w ,
)
- . , 3p Seek responded on July 7, .1984 rte this -planning.igses ethingit$lah that% * - 2.
. sto' asun policy" has been clarified by deleting *er greater defsgutete sed 86 5 t' **
,. v repla it with " Site Area or Geogmal Wy.8,yWlathao'adstdethsed that. W2 < l
. , .: this is not responsive to y*a eas41er 4 the s : 86 0 ' .*
g'
. . ding is not a subs $ g4 9.. 3 . . .
; , .that Beelsneed " int to -
1petiey# . M ' t: 6 53a sorg there eatemetaa eht een mayi 9 * " ~- 1
-$ tessl returned to the a ore the daq$ . _ $ d)hfece64dtems o N . . .'..p
. .greteet4ve action recomemads . on August M6_"J'^ 74tetetste iem .e i -
</ eitted ad41tional proposed y e to narroes the stal.,tf .Wult-((*P - -
{ . 366, proposed changes, i.e., the 'GoiNome8 prosedwo sa 96ss S W V,-) -
. -' .. ., . Og delettag all words af ter *A1 finds these proposet.glan' abanges i i
.; te be acceptable. FINA will awmat the Spheal putumissian of thebe plan ebanges *-
', in 1487 in order to verify that 1,he, correetietsi have been ande. ..
2A the November 28, 1984 fall aos raise, an eres requiring corrective - ".- sotion was identified which inve1Ves .the unsuccessful trainidt.gf ambool 0 * * -
. officiale la response options (ese- t Eseroise Assamenest (FEA)," February 27,4
- s 9985, page 63). Additi6nal tra .must be provided to assure.that all. scho61 -
. . offiatals understand the various gense options and are, avert' of their-
- e. ; responsibility in the overst of an esency. During the W ne;4v'9966 - '
; . gfull.seale eneroise, it was determined that plans and proopdureg hase a@t - .
i been developed for at least two nonpublic sch6ols. Althodds the e60ety . provided evidemos of written offers ta assist schools in the review of { esengepoy preparedness plans which were sent to schools in a letter dated
'j s, .Geteter 7,1985, the school off&oials interviewed could not reonal having ^- '
1 shose offated this assistanos. This issue has Aeen t 03Sssified'asi a deficiency *
'.* and'FatA. has recommended that State and C,unty officials shouldsTe11ovup '!
'I isth the acepublic schools in Roolcland by to ins wa that pla's a and the geoepaary resources to protect nonpub 1 students are in, place.
a
. . <3
.h accordiasettostudents
.. Se school principe18p$aformation at two (t) no9, p b110 schools.forhas not been three p(rovided
- 3) years. .. .
- g. .
,. . to those school prisoipals, 4ty last inforupties.prordde64o - .m
, e 1 was in a 1983 letter wit $ Instrootions to pareaWand ad
! e, #dnergeasy isfeeustion brochure, (FRA dated September,1986, guich $2)2 -
- e
! ' e:
- Me State. responded to these unresolvW exercise issuesratating that sobool ' .
) f gfgioials till be provided traiains ist asptember 1986. FEMA intends to . -
e attend a sample of these training seestoms for school'offieials to verify . i the adequacy of the training. . 9l.
. 3 .
j- / .--^.ahastar c~mtv
...f .are opas or ter County closed andplan ocasiders specift foup A(aro 4), (2) esaditions for whether .aeh6els t pr$eetiw y ;.,.. * .aptions,Ter the Alert, Site ener. and %gotion Euesgancy 1pecomenadatsoa.'(PAR SCLs. .F'.'it la M
.Theat 49e as follows: : [- .i-( y.: ,
' g. y7 e .
- Early Dismissal inclu4ing keeping schools elosed. ( Alert! SG.) *
,J.4 +
lE f a. ..
.E - }.
"* .V 1
p4 .g. . .. e r n. h.31 n.
. J
- 3. . .
- i. .
t
+-
.5- J' t- __ - _ . _ . _ . .. i
' Shelter in place. .
j i ' Move students to school receptise eenters. .- y- . .
' Eeep students in school, untit morum1 dismissal time.$!c . 1r: -
. ... . A6 Atto Enestoney sus BGde tes p3mk M ao.provides =e.; '
..y . y . . M egneuntian af us .it yeare dr. assy.paggueabisomes, = %. .. !
- s, ,
~
t gg ,g' a low tenpresse es gism,
" . . , . i
'V.- k . fhde efe stateskate. tm the Was tht Mrs the deetagen sabere te eensidert s 2 4..the pfie cirodestaaaen ere given denegency before .selasting $he PAR" that -
, y to to implemented. fur schools. ,
. .- the plan statet (Section C of Att$cheeut 3 toeAppendim M that,'if M aupply -
l
.i of buses is limited, the buses will be ssed to owseunte.sehool achildren
- hefore the evacuation of the general publiet.
'.?
'.c .
;- In addition, Westchester Comty has infernally peovided.FEMAite(th.mepted of . !
i$he school plans that are in place Tier use in thr event .af s'ryttelegiemi - .*
. wgency ag Indian Point. FEMA has aete reviewed these cohe9b.33msk hinet m ir .
; i theF are inste to the County plaar whielg,desemibes La detail the meanse -
-) s in Which or otive action ruoammendations uill be developed spid implemented
, .:* for sobools.in Westonetter County. ,
, . J
- i. Womever, during the June (,1986 full-aeale eneroise, it uns.epeerved that
- the eeoced-anift school coordinator at the Westchester Oeunty 30C wea not s
-J trained and daad a long o .te 1961 forsica tbs Schoell procedure portion ?
i . # the Cosetty, plan (Proo ,
- 4) .. FRE.has reo that. sufficient s, W gr,bpopup achool ecordinators aheeld be trained and app with
, WJW
- i i .. ?
f;. + (, b h4s.fausgy Fian states oesters,that =ahaat fenSities, imelodiis eingery , i . i' i}.- . ashes and Way .aere are asagt$ered Abseiel: iteilit&da. igg'_'.erseestime
- j. es (Attachment' 5 to Appendis AR as requifst by WWEEM554. .
Pr Action Recommendations for tIgo songol populatica would to selected .e ,l l
}
.,, feet 't fellewing 4ptions which are speciftelPsin the School Precedure. -
!' . A 45*. 44ert t o.,
l- . l Esep .aobools closed if act Wpeasion -+ ) a -}
'r k-'. -
S ter in place n
.g -
e. 1 4 f,. 9 t - i - 2 J Eid -
. .N
1 l l i j 4 . l At the Site Area RCL, ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ ~
~
, Any of the above * "
' .( .
* .3dpotive evacuation of stadsats under 12 ytare y 1, . . 54 * -
pregunt wesen, mad.others with a 10w.helestaas- h ,44&enF . D
- f. 4% b Genamat h eteoF % -Y. ,
.[}
W d the h ~ ~ ' Y #hNM " b* Move studenta to a ashool 9sopien teater I
' At the May +9,1986 acetirig FBIA poiath out that.(1) the earlyN@, -
eption was not included in the Putnam tounty WLan'and, 2) the' 9'8 3,p. .,
,' evacuate students to a school recepti$ch center ledhd at either the Alert er Site Area M oog EQ.s. ' ,
'.n. -
kJ - i the Putnam Cowity plan is being revisupd to ino19de thage consi
- 9 ' -
When these modificatiete are complete. fb11owing PAR options ter sobools at the 1ert, Site Aree Putnam County plan' h '-
~
, General Energeney ECLs. 'y j .
' Esop soboels closed if not in asesion
; -; ' Early dismissal (Alert SCL) j , ' Shsiter in place '
, ' Mqre students to a aohool reeptses center
's
- W issues related to radiological 6 ergency pewsgretees.fhe'so W e in Putaan These Saesau Gemty fall were identified into too groups during the June 4,1986 Psil.coale i enero(%', * ,'
as fellows: . t
.1 f
- Asfbrastion The availability for schools; ano, and Qs of emergenoy @ - y 2*. * * " "
- n
'".. ~ *
' The alloostian of bus resources to schools. -
8 1
. !, $4 . , acets riguiring corredtive petion taaluded:
( Ig ' tifain had .nson'worided tg stude a of dther the Roehy Arik : ( ' l'or t slig Wid behool-ressrding v " 1
.: noe Putnam-{M65 ur he 1 asian Point. !~ FtNR *.igoeemo,e,ded" 1 "'
./ M in pub 1'id,.
the procedures tf fel bl ad nursery moboola ehdald'be'esee. I' ' ' ,
,p is the evnak of a radiolegical'. ' ' , ,
- ij. gay emeb67 at Indian Pod 4 (PEA, 8 yp slage 126) ? ' *-
1
*qi > h '.
- t- g . .
41 7 -
~
h .
,9
. t
% g ~.
* . ws-k * .
t 1
- 2) the principal of the Putnaa Va31ey' Jgdoc MS Bohest.5mmen*N 7:r.* 5 . - " -
eight (8) buena would be ret t'or avasuntion. Based se fgebte:-( .. ? Astgamment t to Procedure 5, hools of the Pg asCounty.Dnan6'85$F5
- seveh (7) buses have been alloosted to the ta11st.4misp q . . .:s i
- 1. i FEMA roccemended that the al ima of bde sesseees to geheets *-
.+/: j'*
.Wv .
- County should to revietted te are that the sugMy of baseg. :: . r
- ,1. ..h . unto to Joset the demand in .the at of a full ewpeptoe4pBA; : 4 .
1966, pese 136).
/.-p
, ,e I
W W*h:,w. . ts<
.' .: 3te crease county Plan st.ates their school, foo111paty imelodish enreery .
8: l l.' enheels and day care esattes, are eensidered speWal' familities ases . edis'A); Tty poesabp . aseenation planr.ing pstrposes (AtW. 5
. Prot.eot.iue Actions for the school Je9usat a to nelmated wthy ...
2 Sellowing options dich are speaifiel in the School Proceduret - - t
' At the Alert ICL, toep schools olosed if not in messign . . .
s (;- J Shelter in p1poo , l i [ Early Dinatssal
. At the. Site Area EQL,
; Esep schools closed if not in geseien Shelter in piece
)
l .
/, 4t th.e general. smerse.ney EC1.,
[ 3eep school olosed if not it asetton . 9. V . Svelter in place t j ,
, I, Nove students to school receFthen oesters c
4 1 .fte early dissimmal option tras listed ip'the implementing procedure under. h the Site Area and General Bas y response actions. t Since this
,. .s son is specitied only foe late A ECby At idas ausgested<that t a ,
RC p's to avsht possible . maies. . 4 n '. a.' ta's to Weleted fron thasq- two h - r . v. A s'belag.tBenet,ed Sep Site .u i .: , .i- b state cesponmed stating that erby. .< ,.
- <M/... . -Area see General .Emersoney BCLg. 'htis chaap in aseeptable. 2.
b s.E ' . $ seed as tae results of the J
- 4,-.1$$ full.sealg eneseise..a . . . - f. .. -
daghe -
. .r the M aistrators at anse 2
f l* J.-- Adad$ed t$t inclieded t y $spense procedurte -(PEA, $%
.apest of radiological opr 1
- * ' ~
' 3 %
, t #{:i pop 103). -
, y-3 , -
5 .,.4-U.a; $ . _; ' 6 s wa p . - - -.
ys 4 ,5
~
t 7914 recommended that training 1A radiolagical= emergsasy'respumwygegeseartrrr should be provided to school eff10$S1s (FRA, Septembee %.raams 895)ie.i- t- i. fa : . C. Recepties Centers
.,' anpop9d County .
rien 114sa four restaates as enhoetwoosp = - ..
.... p i $s preget etenans W 4 .i h N ;s 3 ,
ao
;d v. ugs esmaees (preesdee .
[ ,,' ' Son Boano R.S., Semacy, S.J. ,-
- Reaspo Community Colh, Moldah1dl.J. . -
) '
!
- Dergen Community College, . Fargsus, N.J. .
4 ' Orange County Community Coung$, Mi@, N.Y. - . .
-[. .
Since these Taoilities are not winin paklaed Coue,$,g,.and regardtsas of 'tase . - - respintion of Rookland CounW's aprodg$ive aav/ it id sensemahls se stepas .-
} these four facilities which age 3saaticit dg46v Jersey.and Oranje Countyp, 4
Wes 1erk would not be covered by* thp1qql$tM Ceunty egeostive lair.. fterv 2- e
.! p, ietters of agreement are ati}1 poquired witk thaps fWue 44 bene 11141,s.-
l r . I r la the November 28, 1984 full-scale espreise, as area poentring~.ce N otive a ention was identified wh& cts found cW&oaticas betweee 1.be Rochtds6
- T County E0C and the Beresa County 30C d$fficu14' to oseptete, reposf%deg a . .. .-
*
- deficiency observed at the 1983.ederesp er the State Capensating N . +
e' Flan fer Rockland County. Arrangemedta M W a Deesty to tend as . .
! eperatione liaison to the Reckland M B00 have get been besp344ad.ifd . :
; .. dated February 17, 1985, ). recaemended thst repesassmatp pe of $$rgen County and New J representatives of Bev fas4tand -
l it$Aitien g a Bergen Oputer W .4 bookland Cosmty to establians the
- E , liaison and ensure that this function 1%e starred in the Agtese.95 .i
' v
$nted February 27e 1985,page49),
I turing the June 4,1986 fu14-ooalp roies an agua requirise corroative line @ terlikking Bergen County a 4 setten included the dedicated tel ' not operational and was reported and pockland County. The telepho
}ismonth5 FRE reeoomended all J s, i to have been inoperable fee the '
ocemunication equipeont abould be opegitional med tested in ecoordance with . p14ae (PEA, September 1986, page 18% b between Rockland.'and Beegen Countime c.:
.One result of the o$mmunications ters loested in New Josioeyda . -
. o *. is that the opening of the rose difficult to ooordinate with the ation of proteetive acties sweeb e -
of popolataces -(e.g4. 1
* .meadatione that would inves,ve rol r .x
- t,.
; ; . . e - ebrileen) free Rockland County, New Yget.d . This diff$ce3ty saa
! . 3 ,.
i p . both $he 1984 and 1986 full soals Moiese.
, . 3...
' r.
lJ
. } )
t i , .a ibD*4d- i
',7 % ,h j'
.: f a '.'.v.
- 6. -',,. the State roeponded to these unrgeolved plaa sail esieseiseTlegg.13'W D' M Ii'I T
.. July 7,1986 letter by stattag tbs @: ug 1.G 6 ptters of agreement wtWooteol receptico esateve-14!st4&E" t' '
s
, g epen issue; and, -
. g- ._ ' & $0S$stled telephens systeet betenen Berg 4pty endi.it - i-
<f hainkaad County is &m eerftse'.
1 rf'e . .. l
-[. ," FREJinds the issue of gettere of &
re of agreement elre e 44#4N,
, u] . . he udrosolved until all a '
- 83 g e.' ' < * -
. dediopted telephone systes to County d BecklaS U M D- *. * * ' , ,-' '
- l. have to be verified during t$ not observed eteraien 4:.;#p a i: .' -
?, 1katabastar Countiv . . :. d - l The surpaat plan in Table 1 of Atteo64ent 1 to pt'costure'4 ienstiit5ts%% ' -
<i
! there has been a recogdition &f the plapains needs of theischod1 pe$ dis $1aes. - '
i This Table lists the schools withis 0 atle SE, the plaan$ag efta number, , ' -) , the enrollment, the school receptiot r, the asageisted gegerei dis @ mist 1'es ' 1 hl
; reception senter, the nimmber of vehto egeded,: Gat,rtht}tipures or d .'s + -
the evacuation vehicles. A summation of thei ind@v& dual fInciM4F tate" s i
$4 schools with 23,264 enrollment l 45 nursery schools and day care senters with 1824 enrollamet ,::'
h j . 430 evacuation buses - 1
~; 80 evacuation vans
, z.
,i 29 school reception centere .- -
k tousver, an inconsistenay was in . 4, Attenheesti j 4.a. . . Appeneiz. A, Attaohnent 5, with d to the tien at the%4hedW egedytise * " ** ~
. . . esoters. Attachment i to Pr e 4.(Seat 3.13) states that tes:tahSerha t " S' 2 not cellected by parents or others vi g speabas time will to bthed le F oester. Attaoheest 5 to $ppeasta A : "
.t the associated general public recepg l f 4 estates that the school reception cente p wetl remain in operatiest until all
[ ebildren have been reunited with their Basilies. - h Sese sections should be reviewed and emended accordingly. . Attatilipd te.the * ' 's 1 J July 'f.1986 letter from New fort state were proposed p'las etQ *W. .<'r-j .', eerspot this inconsistency. F ^ '
. i'
- e .
~
l,* ( 1s addition, the issue of the assured Ava116b111ty of 4hef fa6144411sted -d i-5', . as'sobool reception senters is-ed gosphately resolygd. ~50may' Wf>4EAbeho6L 6 9' J4 & hhW "i i i I 4tseussed in the January 31
.f
. recep(ton' oentera are ,also 1986 listed og .
.e,ta.1. leSt.
general.-.. /4st! publie< .. pse$ Wtjfh J. - e y e + i-
- 4 i
m I. -) i ij . m .- u- . J h. . .a . .*
.'t- W O 1
-10 .,.
.,- . . . e
,, l:
ej -.kF i f, ' : The State responded in theit.891y 7,19M netter. Webs i? '
*?- .: -
1_ . _._
. . . :.6' ?
1 ' ~ ' Yhe operation of neoelkreeption oenters pie toca.sevassed;Y .k, r, ., e i and revisions have ,been made; and.
.n . J.F; .
f: ,
' % transmittal letter datcd June.25,19M #BIA hef popaged:C ? .'. .. a, . -
all of the school reception ao er agreements le eted SW.tz .- . . . .
.-' . Vestchester County. 5pese9er, school reney a .s. .6. .
c setteh are located in Dq s y stigt r Egit is eeSoing to attaga irri c [j .
.h . ,
,s
(, 'is .- V j
,g 1-4 she anuemais list nas toes essested pee two _ ?""4
. -~ N% ..
.4n
- u
i, seem seu rerk state:
'r 960o1 Reception Center L ters of Westen%' : . - ..
+ Yes ..
. ( b ,-
White Plains I.S., White Plains, N.Y. I '-', 4. ~; . . ;. I
,c, 5 '
j Gep(an Sobool of White Plains, J.Y. 1
. Monarogeek. Ave. School, White Plains, N.Y. I .. ksh{,)... , "
3' f
, '. Bades Street School, Port Chester, N,Y. I F i J .I.5 ',1 '."WN
. P4shk111 Plains 5,5,, Fishkill Plaipe, 8.T. - .i .. .
*- Seybes4 3 3., Moposell Junction, N.Y, -
a Corner Rd. Wappinger Falls, N.Y. -
,8 E.S. , Beacon, N .Y. -
Brinker4>off E.S., Fishkill, N.Y. . . i Ridgeway School, White Plains, N.Y. I - John Jay S.H.S., Cross Rivier*, N.Y. 4
!. X- - ..- .
l No. Salon .N.S./M.S. , No. Salem, N.Y. I
,.- 1 Solomon Schooter, White Plains, NgY. I '3- .
l Ardeley 8.3 Ardsley, N.Y. 2 : . ;-
- l
; taPk Ave., Nrt Chester, N.Y. I 3 i -
$' Foz 5.aot US. , Bedford , N.Y. I - .
St. Patrick's, Bedford, N.Y. 1 . 4* . oi '..' ' . . . . - g John Jay J.M.S. , Cross River, N.Y. I .
; , poraes Greenpy M.S.,;Chappaqua, N.Y. I . .. 4. .. . ; t.
31136 Bacok 5.3. , Port Chester, N.Y. - '
' I i Elag Street School, Port Chester, N.Y.
I ..
,f Dohe Ferry M.S., Dobbs Ferry, N.Y. I Pequanakenck Elementary Sobool ' I '
l
?
l hrrison Raph school X
; g@t 9pstne Middle School I .
-] . .
i e ... t g4 found most letters of agreesopt to in plane:ame uilbauettappin'.emeadh fa. ci
' *. 4 : selon'of revised plans to verify t correaktoss'Aer. 4aotestWlaneten.<w.1 - .It
.igithis the procedures have been mado. ;- c t.. . iw -
t . 4 ( ; / c. -
; 4.. ,
i,. .
- y. , . ....
- . . .:r ; .
t . ,- .. . i li 4 g. c.. Trl g, h
, . r ..m
? .
11 3
, s g, dg ...
. A.u. .
- _ n ..t, -
-----r :- -- -
Ths current plan in Table 1 of At$ashment 1 to 14e Schools um 'shoun t' - !
"Whas been a rooognitiam of the planting need of ther pgulat . '; i 1Ms pple lists the schools uithin the 10-pi1ME,-the numbee, -
. 11 ment, the schoo) ree $ 1on se , the asase m "pupplattes' -
, . tien senter, the spader W mtpunt les geodgs,+4ad.4he heuree et
t
. the nation webiensee & WW $ fho1&ity dater. -
. . , , .
- 4 enhoeta 4th gg empel -
4 i 8 s aureery schools and se earo11 at (no encou. ant meus fee i - - a 1 two schools) - - '
' 45 evacuation buses l ' 3 school reception sentere , 1 l - South Avenue Schoold Mod, N.Y. !'
- Sargent School, Boeo, , 5 7 p j - Rombout School, Se , N.Y. 9 -
.Seeever, in reviewing the current p1pa,. SMA found an inoemoistenoy $a table 1 Y '
.- of the School Procedure and Table 9,pr the Transportation Procedure. According )
to the data in the Transport @n Procedure, four of the f1To nursery sebeels ', i l listed do not need transportation.asplatanoe. However, in the Dohesi peeoedM i ' l g the table indicates each of the fite nursery schools required 1'bem. 4h&s l information should be reviewed and scended soooNiagly.
* - 7
. The issue of the assured availability.of thoilities listed as scho4Ltcoobphish "
r eestere is not ocepletely regelved. At this time FRA does met have 'a oopy -
, of a letter of agreement betappen tag p and the gehool-district aparating * '
e the 3 schools in the toun or proose - ton are listed as school. eeeepsteo -
'. eenters. The State ces la % July 7,1986 letter by totati4thatt t b ' School reception oep flee futaan Cotasty school.ehilerta -
o are located in DuteNEks County (3Deson $chool 31str$st):
- As ie '
i of this time, the school board hos not ecovened .to discuss. -
. $his issue and grant approval. The Datohess County Emergency
- I Annagement Director is di Sly working to ensure that these -
- Letters or Agreement are . The Director has indicated-
- that the Letters of Agreens d )e available by 4 1
, 4 August 1, 1986.
-, . ,Wege peoently ,it was indiosted the letters of agreement W110ett se o *3 a l
, 1,, pesilable until October 1, 1986. 4tgas remain upresolved'until the * =
P- n'has been oorrected for tasonstptmeeles and Jetterp of agressent#with a reception osaters are obtaiggd. e .- . a . . ., . . i i ' v J .9 + & __-- l
1 s. . ., '( ,
) . .n .
m . . - - .- -
- c. Ths.eurgwst, plan in Tabla 1 of Procedpre 4 shoue that there bote 4 - . . .
re@.of the planning needs of %be school populattees,;.. .Tehts % *- .- 113% mohools within the 10- 34.4P1, the.planetag ergF r .4 - - s ,o espelament., the school reception spor,theesseeigt ses.4c.'i- t
.. pegsp61sa sentar,.the aumber er. tion te ,tandi$heisouresf 4. a..
*; 3 ef M evneantion vehteles. A e af Sodigi .Jed111tr esta': -foi :-
etenes . .
- 4 geheeLa uttb the eart1M ' :-
.. gr. [~ 1642 4 1- ' -
-
- 1 aureery adhool utth enrollmed 45' 15 ,'
' 26 evacuation buses i
- 1 evacuation van I
; ' 1 ochool reception center . t
- South J.M.8. *
's There is an existing letter of agreeagnt With theggh Citrischeet district fbr use of their theilities in the evoet of.an emergency which m: - <
essures the availability of the schoek reception contem. .
, D. Traneportatico tesouroes *
?
- M .MW11.Y g i Appendiz 4 of NUROO654 (section II saa 31.=) states that the schosanpape.
f lation shall De tvaluated in.the.sps facility. :-j ^ t est&matisg. - -
'. the aumber of people to De evacpted t,he af, M pertatica 4hal1.he b. .
; . described. In the current veswaan of lead Goengy.P .a tattlaties :,d %-
.f* et.the population could not be topstdf. A ione verssen of' plan o '"- '
listed the school population att appro%1F 22,000. 'The eerstal versina of t-
. the plan lists (Procedure DPT 3p AttenbeentL 1) 218 tuses as teles availablet i
- s. Amm primary sources and an additichal 346 Suces as teing available: flram e *.
t -ascendary sources. In the even the *Go Bose Policy' has not been ' f implemented or the decision is'g ~ gede at this option is not, the safest ocurse .
.. er action, the cohool evacuati6n'opti6n augt be implemented. .- .
thattheschoolerneusW1osoptikp be. required s; the procesa er . . .: - .' .E
.. . whereby.the tenilable e peeourso d be assigned 'tetween.4he r. rnv .
- 4. i sehen1 dad general pub 33e eune M eeuld' act.be local,ed da the planF - '
t. J
, la gathering inforseetten Ms Wes 5 the EfPIRO petitiet in MEF 1985i - -
. .. a the State indiosted to FEMA thag 346 hppes would.be e'eqtstred'for %e 'ermounties: 'n, 4* .. .d F et toekland County. 3a age 6tio Stue State indicated that there were~ 3331.1 i.:..Lm e
.A v. buses available,. 333 buses eo6traagt., and e at there were4161 traines n 4 + -
!: j driiers. .. 2': . .' ~. .
; ."~ 7 m
( S. , ;
l i
~ '
-1) b*
i.4
&9 *
~
' Ti e ,; r, data taken hem Procedure $PT-2, Attachment 3 eM V' .
i ,4 44, that there are 7558 peop14 Pequiring bus treasgottamast ged' .-
.. 2 are required W11ch is in agreement with.the.44 ster .. .. -
. .. These figures indicate t the avereeg papae1 9.pser -
figure is used to esties the bus reaOurses needed Lir A..,
,.p.i W.
q.j 3-
, apprt31M981F V10 tueS would be regsstred -Af w
.evacuatine pass fe' scheel epildren. . :g , .4 3 M-
..s' a *.
..ar l t{
, rh - Re ourcent plan atso states.that if * '- . ti .. h
;- e tially esfest, sourse of metdan, haded At=F4
' s popsglisator, the sobool amergency econtt $ rgot"thet - -
J. . *3 ggoons to evacuate to a Scheol Recep41an at4r, Therefera,~ A Iu
.... p's. evacuation plan eteneds ( pne-wave ePraaastion. - ', . '- . - - -
Intgraspion supplied by the State i .May 1985 stated that theen were' 333 [ ke$ss under contract while the plan lieh 564 buses. .Sitt%2 thia - 8
. 3peger vaine may not be entficients' 4epending on the average?ggsdStg.of the; 8 -
guess. Lettere of agreement are recu4 red with the bus providW",Wielgaure ==
,> r
. the availability of the needed resources. The following inic ' i sempiled from the current plan dated May 1,1986 and data' "IDE.<.4 l De New York State on July 7,1984, . ' ?@ . . ;..., (,' ..,
f .;- 5 Trhamportation Companies Vehiclear Yehicles
- Required per Available r f$(5'T 1 ~ IK '
tas? Plan Per LOA 8
; Amt II. 'Breestertat. ion Inc. ? 53b. 32v 5e .
good. s idlaw.,Trhasit Inc. 56 48b, 42v Ay ..
., 14r Barsma) 85aserstawn Central Soh. (primary) 9 Not Identified *:-4 :. .
H
, tavaq,trpw (primary) 73 69b, 65v '
. X .l tiaalpied +
j P Brgsa (primary) 50 5%,4v - ( eby causity -
- 14ad and City'T.R.I # .3, I
- t'c *
( rpl ? Not Identified .:- - 16o " ' *
- ' san i-
- f. 1.ine 90 * * - .
J., i apo Central School District 22 * * -: falley Rapid Transit 40 *
- i l- -
I-t4silan Free Soh. 15 l Sei Orangetown Soh. 12 - Educational Trenaport , 40 -
.I. Additional County Bus Operatore 112 * * - ; i jees p as Dpt-2) '
\ ..ll . l T f 3-1 g.- d ' M '
> - i.- g*t
- .C . s td.;& ' %_
- .. -
- M.
- I i
,. t l * .~ . .
14 . ; 4 .;. % k ,f As stated in " FEMA's . Analysis and Beepomeg Tef Supplement '93.hgygge :i E t
,y4* et , Petition For Suspension of Operation of the Duf1Mt htte e ran&w
-j 7 4y.. .- Igd May 9,1985, in-depth bus-trandportatidy 3, ass see. r g@ww . -
, .i}7.c 4.j finalised by the Trans ion,3tudy Planning Gr$ epi sgn . 1 2-g g. 3= <;. ., .
.t 1985 M gg e'pejeet S$46us repoe4 er the /- N . r ;
Li h . 4 tet September 17,1964 sia (6) ansportaties were Weresseda.Plan Sey ilfer BoeN4ad.fq}:/ 1- t 'jr a. I"* y. ,
. >.c. . . nemend assessment . ,.
t
- Resource Analysis r,..< , .
, ;
- Roadway Network Char b arist J - .
's , " .
~,
- sorties Design ( ;, -
# ..
- Transportstion ResouPoe esent , . .. . :;- '
.
- Training Program . .
. s .
.a- . .
i ocoolusions and reccomendatiens of the jransportation Stuty- . : ar v , 4', - ooluded in the current plan. r, the stitudd to restesed w -
. f amended to olarify the ourrent bF ide try asperately,the.' ...
.. l 4 population transportation resoug and the spe al facilityi
~
g rb , - 4
, ,' .(iseluding school children) tot png resourcea. .This inferas)1de' c. g: 5* - i to assure that sufficient trans rtation resources esist to adMontaty - -
l protest the school children in Rock 1 dad 00anty. ,,
. Also the, information supplied by the, State is May 1965 indleated thyt @hers - -
were then 161 trained bus drivers available la Roaki==t Countyr . No.6ed;4stal.a. .- I has been provided to FEMA to indicate that additional drivers hva ' - trained. In the Movember 24, #954 apt thgt ge 4,1986 fna3Legale sea .h -
.; veral issusa were oited M indtigaspf that thW tr$1aing of Abe-. yera. u
.- *; e act been'ocepletely suooessfnal. be issue concerned Ann 4equa$b. W u.
- ' :rt the school evacuation bus arivera in that they did met know;ther speedfie - ..
! tien of the school recepti4n center (FEA, February 27,1983,, pagar,$7). . . r:p o
.' the June 4, 1986 exercise,.the b$ dispeteher fbr saverstrow Treastt- %'2 W.
. ted that- only 6 of the 95 bus d ra expe 2ted had received tralaims ;' 6 3-i( n using dosimetry (PEA, September be page 83). .* /* ~ .
.; i
~
- - i FEMA recoseended that maps should developed showing the legation (e) of ". 'd A scheel reception centers to whieh. Is are assigned. These maps:ehouldr bb 3.
-l
-l asintained at the bus garages $br "ribution to drivers in the event a.
3 aobool evacuation becomes necessary @E4, February 27, 1965, Dese 67). .6.. i
- " During the June 4,1986 full-scale eWartise it was not.ed that/ there were stip ,
.4 Js apgs available at the Havemtraw Tm it Campany, to 61reat drivera :Frea 44tethp.t:. .., s .
J.) ' ' q
. (saigned schools to the Rooeption r (FRA, September 19M, pageJB2hyihMi14s ;
# .i h'
t'- .
!; .f} ' '
* ' 1 '.:. ,.
t
'.*3 e.
('
,h. , i..-
7 y
. t, 3 - -
b . Ls . N .. .\ .
' L ...t'.. .-C..
, 's
- o. '. '*k . .:
i 1 V .:
. 15- .3
%m&'",-
-- :1
.i -
.- Bee tark state responded te the issus of bus provideeg ty ebahg d' 4. m. T .p . -
. ..$ he$ers.of Agreement with bus previders tiave been ehtsimet ..0t'- if d . .#. .
ty ,,eed Ladioste the mushar* of buses,21eh Md be made meng3eb4sgs:h1' 4. t e. l' , Mu Bete that C3arkstoun School Distries is a bus prorseer but it=E'i "- . rd 1 jy , ta ths osatentico of the coasty that no Lepter er ayeemset Y4 1 1 - d
.c, .f. 7 is required as C1artsstost is a municipali g . 6 af ; fib % ,'a < '. .
V . bus (rivers will be 1 C " ] epteRiorp, 1996.'.i . , i' ' i* l' l
+r (- FM4 finds these issues to te enh are 3 (f$ !
lettere ist the meseseary transportattaa rinatiat, it n *
- et i f e.
am dtdained and a bus driver /gIr obe , aiming schedule is out(si 4e
- g~ 4 .
. > . i for review.
.Maatahmatar County .
The 1ssee of assured availabili4FAf te6001 transportation Pes'ourceiride est : ' P
~ ~
oesplately. resolved. The plan 1 tats tire ocumercial companies. madt%ree r - L i . school districts as being bus ers. One of the ghool disteteDef w n- . O r, .i. been maaigned to the transport nests of their aus soneelsi Emig rn .:...: ... .p t
- 4. . .~ July 12, 1985. letter te FEMA, t State provided ongdes of -d T= %1ng Ns:y-W
.. ) the same cooper.ies listed as supp11 era of buses fer the . pub M '. /L. *..'J/4 .
t evacuation needs. FEMA found thal. thspy letters were eaceptpbKFer 6 -
. Y s, several reasons including not bei$g signed by the County, not bei Mted , .y a not showing effnetive dates of the agreement, not showing the q t.. rt'i a t being provided, etc. In a Jana ry $9, i . n c as ... '.
i assurance that Westchester County ps" pu$6 lettse to FEMA, 4n4 95444,.Pauin '
. agreement with the bue & ==ies.
. t." . .t .,
amanuse the current letters of espont which are available-to'FE'M&ld6 act'..., - 4pg gommitted FDS een not verify the%bsire l'. r always list the number of teses k I i suffigiest buses are available,- ersation supplied by the State to WWE. %- a ii > in May 1985 indicated that la test 4pster County 432 buses vois14 he regatr4 f- - i f 1011 buses were available, TSO busdp were unaer contreet, and that'45 pit , .v m
- i traleed drivers were available.s Copa dedl Lng $he number of bushp listee.a8 . i "t i teing needed for school svaamntion ), ie'the stesle wave sensustdem i e r b. . '. /
- eption is desired, the' auster of bup pequ& red should be reevaluated end. i.- i- l'
{ 1etters of agreement must be obtained to assure the availability er the- . accessary resources. The fellowing infopsatio& was compiled from the t * .~ s'S.Jin. current plan dated September,1985 and este submitted to FEMA from Rev. York . ~5: ,A
) 4,:v .
.~,iL7 4l;.y .
y.y .: ..
' s. .
.{I -
V .- t !f}. f L, *: t t 9 N.~h. w. .
- - .\
d .Y.
~ **
h *
"[. h .
l
- s . y.
isk _ - _ . .
.::W -
1
. A '
'y e l j 7 state on July 7,1986: 7:$ #*
b, 4 a i Transportat,1on Companies Vehicles Tehteles , I t. Reqmiste per Available . . .i . _ _ M an _ pee taA -
- t. ;. , , . . , ,
i Salalaw (tbroorly T;, 'T
- it, .- -
* ) 175b. 47v .450b .; .
^; .A ' . '/- ;
- Sat, t, .4v set % n ~ .. r aphyges 8.D. 846u'3.'4t4.
J Bob . .2 ,4y 4 e Wok Identirimp < ff.b -1.
- qua .- .;
tradriek Nudson 8.D. Notidentifie$.tj ist. i M;<< Naif'
. 95o latters of agreement are regulyed SDP Crotors-Bamon 8.D., timed -
carry their own ohildren. - 4 . '. , . ' . All 3etters of agreement were unstged by the Gounty. Also,iall;:44'Itech >-s .
. of agreement must identify the ausger and typts of veh&olest aQ)d. .L , ! - . . . to state responded sig their July 75 1966 letter as fellowes . b ),,l. M ,.;
- i. ~
., . : : ? .
J Proposed Letters of Agreement are enolosed for 4 of the $ 1de A ' ~ 4 ' '- .
; providers. The one remaining L'etter of Agreement it witJi -
. Lakeland. Lakeland wil.1 sign & Letter of 43reement once sentreet 1 language is completed. i
! All the Letters of Agressent .are caly pro)Neals. These agree- .. ,- - .7 seats have to 30 through a j-ptep process before the Coastty- -
Attorney will sign them. The steps are: t
. 1) Presentation of Lehere of Agreement to the county Bened . . a i of Acquisition and Contract (public Aeeting, possibly i J public hearings); . ,-
, ) 1) Signature of Approval by Commissioner of Transportattegg K . .* , l 3) Signature of County AttorAsy. .- t y. i
.! The time involved in this mas would indicate that amptember. 4986 ;
4 would be the earliest official date letters of agreement would4e - 1
- 1 5 l available.
.t .. l
;. .5 Anne 'trpining issues h speen. En the 1986 asereias, ths bos % %entee us 1. - > -
l *' . . ! e . 5 .0% tbe Imidlaw Bus Garase Out n4rg.did not demonstrate.an iedequ$ po.'!4ilti 3 ,. .' i liti , apparently~because she Was new ap.4beri304; W.r.a ' 1 u q ' . knowledes
- r. 4 -
of herimpieded This sould:have respons protestsen of the publie'because -it souBd 1.+ thy M '
- 9 5 ... > have reonited in the q eggpattget.of evasentisothusee.: 41s teettoa@r Q;,i r ,,- - . -
- y. 9 T .
i 99 *
. , e+
-i-2: -
;4 i ;.
^ ~
s;; h t
..a
- s. . , 1- ,g 7.
FDE fiads that letters of agreemans with treasportaties providops.gMM l'1 k-
.M 5ewever, the training er bei drivers mest ha 1sep&ried by
.ar. tr=i=tne syllabus and traintag eebeginee resa Sew 1erk etasen
) e,a 4 to attens a ammate or these treteing sessioso. '
ry ' 4~ -li, < 'q gr. . & 3 ,Y ff, g,
.s*;
, the 4seen er the assures eve pies lists ese tus campsw.ase er tuefeemuness hao e ;/i4 ,
. .- m er see se rollo w sabest etategety se.9 sing!bes
~
.)
i
,,w...,,...
isle vthseles ' - -
.' l
. Lot- - *-
i i, I j. _17
' 04
.! : 4 she did not demoristrate an adequate knowledge of her responsibilities sor -
ene ncy worker radiological exposure control. Finally, she, had no kncae. e
. 1 of KI and did not distritaste. it eit.her of the'2 bus drivers dio . + a
.]
., i patched from that garage. 1he. o .af allithe faWm*4tas .nispatchers .. - 3-should be reviewed end m ided to all those 44to have 6 . N been trained (or whome training ) on the energency worker re$ioi 41: 4
_3, expansre control i=@res ned Aq the County Plan and the: Plan in r N '" 7'-- 6 .4 general (PEA, September 19s6, 59-R). In aseitian, one of the tus ~ 5 drivers from the Laidlas aus r
.' intervals aru) did not tpde $hpdid het use pecper readof fuer dosimeters atIt.the q(s.i .S. .
the mid-range:URD. recomended that all taid1 pus drivers be trained on the use of all the:, . .
),, e dosimeters sich would be hated 44 then intense of a rp61alggical: >p
- g. - -; '
puergency at Indian Point (PE4, Nester 1986, page W). - 3 . ! ,' 3 FEMA finds these issues to be. Ived until 1) all 1stters of ADrementiate
, obtained arvi the number of tg alla61e can be serified es a~ u fficient to -
i transport the transit dependent ation (including school children) in - Westchester County and 2) a bus ver/ provider training schedule is aut> : : mitted to FEMA for review. "
.i '
} Cranos County
'f the issue of the assured arability M bus resources has toen resolved. - -
4-
. ; 2 the plan lists two causercial bug ccypanies as beim bus provideirs and one r h at e
school district bus providers ,i . T I Mehicle w hicles - -
h 1- -
i Transportation co munies , asquired per Available Ftg)k y . _ Plan per'Im . 3-)mr . '
- .. . 7 - r ge .
W NW W *. N ' *h
&. & - ..1& $*f . \ -
30KH 7 = = se . >g .
..png.3 s Monroe - www1hiry School Distt'let ? "
.g .
,, ., X
- itMf kl 1
o 19 j to,mus4pm the propased changes. ,
,.h~.
E. Puniqs Information. -
.- .W ' . ,9.. .k q.g s.. maskland county Pina precogttes that it.Wu achool craaptQas' sneented, an ses menease sust to 4 pretees.
13 a: .. 4j u; i .e.- *: . c
.. 4 L' (Wooedure Scu-1, Section 5.t.6). SEA R Gew a ses mjg 1 e i;4'; ; er an 41ert or' greater 20., prior PAR, sobool administrators will be
.W4 ed to Sol et
-elastag8 iM .h l '
19p8 t . u .i
,< fat At the Alert or greater 38b's, t@e Goordinator will emeerg tggt:egy;. ,b. cv a '.E informstion imotving the astoty 11dren will be forgsardedb'b 'dv..*
- n. : Publie Internation Officer fbr EBS %setru ion (Procedure SG -t, se 15#.). '
The Rockland County plan adequately puer.t for parents to be met :t 4.
. . school olosing/early dismissal (i.e, Ae Wome' policy) ubich'.ta it . +
. the preferred response option at tage Alert Oc greater ECL's. Boesygm.. la -' - -
response to F2MA omments, the 90/sek aplioy is to be 11 Sited 49 lhe Alert . .- c 83., asoording to proposed chartes $dbettted on Augugt 14,1966. (8sespage.-4 ; - , anote). , unstaapater county ., l
. The Westehester County Plan staten ghat parents will be actified by the local s' f media (radio station) of the situation for response actions at .the..,$ite Arm I . j
. $ and Genormi guergency RCL's (Procailyre 4, Sections 5 513 and 6.5415-). The. 3 ia ! t :' - t t planshouldberevisedtoinclude$.he4amenotificationattheAltet.EG.-
(i.e., in Procedure 4, Section 4 1.3). ,
. W r. aunty l.
The Petnam County Plan states thht pbrente will De .aotified by'an N.hsege. 4 i .c. .,. dieh is appropriate to the respo etion at the Site Area and Gener.nl a s. 4 I l*- - Snorgesty ECL'a (School P , ions ~ 5 5.1 5 and 6.5.t2%. . tale;paan n , .. t
,r theuld be revised to innlede notification at the Alart EG4(i.e.,
.- it
,i la seheel Procedure, Section 5.1 3 e
'.' h County Se statements could be located in the Ortnge County Plan with roepeak to
, , Ipw the parents of the school populati6n would be motified as to tbs respoose ,,
; . r. - ( estion taken for the protect 18h of. his group. The plan should to a8evisse .. :
- , e. requirement that the parentd wes'1d ee .s
- 14 16. . to imelude, in the School Proced
- -
.g ny tetified of the twopones action. .. ,e,, - <
Seu Jed State responded.to thee tastem og July 7,.1966 by stat.AsgY N. . r -:- s , 0' . . .
- a . Parental notificati.an en the gtes 4tf proteoties actie. den* (b>.n '
- a. . ,R' ';;.JJ
- t. - .,.s e
%- ,a .
f % l.
'7 A
s - 9 'i. A yw ' l ':.3 . M.ik.J% ~
.N 9 .
- / . .
,' i
.$ Q ' ' !.
. . .' d . f ?'%* -
~
.t .- -
ehildren who.are in schools loosted la the WE sL11 eeU eb' T f Di e c't' 4
...... . asert BCL. there approgr late, this reevision has shoes *==1=am$ M1sq 4- f eesty school prooedures as a point of information. .=
j%, eif !'
.,. . 1 t.
. 4. v. . Whee pub 11'c information is an overall.ooordiantad reatspoo Aar .Mac-4 3
.,.,el g
. 2.% a.e.eu.het.es ,within the 1t>-e11e .i.EPf,,ahesgh plai abould he.ooeg4GL
.twr. a .. - u p ; ;. .
.< .j' '
4 t r'.1 8 ..k. , WW eill await these pian %,ma6 rettpr then .
, M Infenmat.ian W '. , '4 ..,. . -.. 9. s f...)
6 . . -. .A rev&ow of the eurrent publie teformation.kroebures, dated 1988, *E.,1
- the osordinated response of all four'sounges. The inflernation , .a lW .
. .ta sedh of.the four brochia es seeQqfe& instructions for the prot .) A ".
eebool children with the fo1}owing pPbteetive notion 111pspense- , y -. t .
- ( .. .
. 'Early dianisg& c. M '
' Sheltering a' . .
'Evacunios + R ,p . :
poder the ersountion, response opt $on, the tant ek geek of gne h _ *
.- t l:. *
.I referenets the evacuation route amps contained inf the troebuPWa -
a 3: - - ' l $dentifies the school and the associated school receptibe sett.er,a . f$$la these brochures to be ade@te; 'the 1986 brochudes are to 51443 . '
)sted in late September er early Octobpr 4f this year. FEMA wild httskig ~
arrOa1 and review them accordingly. [ 4 s '-' . vs pt Nava center Procedurea *., ! t .
.t '
I- All counties have agreed to e'toordinated approach to publ46. ' i-
# am8 message release. To sett tidh anordinated role, publio !L y ,
prootsares have been oompiled ib a siteslo Joint' Wews. Cent.or PE 43teta.5'Rtt - r m.. . . < ,; pub 3&o Information/ Education The 1986 version et this L,f "[ dk .t^isi..
' *, ....c .gentates prescripted BBS as a with appropriate arena fter
~
areas where respones actions ape to he et. i .. the desoription or geogr
~~
. Sees prescripted messages ve been parepared to assure that timely i .i -
!- 3 util he available for roles to the puElio once a PAR has beebhfidh14he$ Wyn e' . l j- .the appropriate decision makerg Bowever, there are several peableh4 with <. l p .the orrent messages with regard to bine school populatiota. D,
- She surroat. prescripted messages de inst. appear to preFide infbsual g+ .
fp- t t, k- As encord with FEMA's unders$anding 4f t$ canoept, of operettogs ei$d '= $ .
- i;',.L.
y 8 .'. je reopense actions fer the embool population. It sa FBI 1's- .S t 4 '" 2.. t th44 the Early Dismissal (Go Ross Peitdy),As the proflarred sespahat 3.Nf. . -N . l,'P, . fler the sobool population if that ' posed action aan be ocupleth( ) : i. : ,b
-*. e
.Jther publie FAR's. There are no bor1#ted messages uhjob giW - - F :' D e :
' $nfefeation regarding school responsp motions for situations u% , ',4 - .eq
. '. 4 .; -
'I.,yk',P;f o.2 '..
'i i...[.
L. .h . ?= p -" .< 1 f h.h a _ .- .-_ _. _ . h.k%.s
V #QTri. . l - , 1
'. I l
s- !f.' . 21 Q.t. . ,' )' \ gub11e PAN's are being implemen(ed. . f: C
' 9eu Yost .9. ate responded to this issue by statingt
- ~ ~' r
. . . .. h seed for an EBS trasamissicer,4e indieste status of gtngel ia. .A . -. i'
. ebildrbn will be decided. by the individual Geesty Rasest1Wst ...%.. ,
.- the time a' school prsteetive a '
Sn. .ppropriate Ems a.a a viliisn'is lap 1meented. ne refama Wherefers A. w e a tm.t - we...'.. w.
.1 - W O c. ' fes n w . the state cesseene w 4 . pe en e w n e m . -
' Otal actifteetten nest W eepteet with prorisimas specified in the county ph W. Ja scoe ocuhties, parentai h( nhb'"T i f J' .e' .'
r. 1 notification via ESS my oc WP. $ the Alert, Site Area op '-
, /
General Emersoney. ' -
' It would be helphal RP di fear counties agree on a meane i e4 .
.I 1 of notifying the public ce protective actions for school -
s 3 children. EmerQ so esperieepe has abown that even with - prescripted messages, the ftftpenwsinute requirensat is 'T. *
,)ust barely met. Therefpre,1EMA rqquires that prescriptpd i.a *-'
messages De prepared for all forms aff protective actions ! N ' 8 - for school children.
- l
* . A formal submission of proposed changes to the plan will be requi Md ..- rd . ,
by FEkA. . .- i hY Ensed on the information provided by the S$te of New Eort on July 7, 9988'"-- > 6 and FINA'sirwi&w of the current vogtgbester, Rockland, Orange, and . -
.-.1 i Futaan County's Plans; PdMA found khe following* - - I I
pnekland County
'4
- fratecti f , Actional I ' Proposed plan changes to clarify the Alest BCL as the only BCL : -
in which the "Go Home Policy" (2112 implemented must be . formally submitted to FEMA in Spa next annual submission. v ' Areas requiring correotive sotteli identified during-Sto i t ' . - (e 2-
.2 November 28, '1984 and a deficidioy $4 the-Joe 4,1984 ~ 8 .. .z
$ . r; full-scale enerosses must pe.,resolyed. This would ' - r-
~
. . .. . 7 include the training of aski.en offibials in both publia , .
..r- > .- and non-public sectors to Insure thyt plans and procedums.8 -* v L
I'. are in place.
- r. I
- t 1
- n. -
.4 .
q.
*". s
42- .
- ' temmunication problems identified between Bookland and, '. a. .
Bergen County identified dur'ias both the November.N,1984 - ... e sad June 4,1966 full-soale enereises are still. unresolved. .4 e r.: a .s - Banantiqn Cantara: 4 ; ;y.~ - . .
- Letters of agresigent are still eutstandias for e amostr.)1:;e.i. :. 4.. . i fM0ptten combeet located Am>3gu Jerwer and Grease % A. ' s . 6 a..s...-
M, -~ 4 9 . MT M tson Ramnureant , ,
' The Plan clearly idehtify the transportation resources c ,
totals for school chilh, tbbspecial Ancility population .. . + (including seheel chi 1 W ) t6 assure sufficient transporta= . tion' resources' esist. -
' Adequate training of soh%. eencuation bus drivers must.be i
made. t
' training schedules must be autettled to FsMA. ..
- Lettere of Agreement with Transportation oospanies have -
been submitted to FEMA 3 ho r, they are unsigned by the . ' .. c. . Comty which negates thnae , triots. Maatahantar County Protective Aetions; ,
- '.
- An area requirinC corspotig petion was identified during Abe . - - - .
- Jme 4,1986 full-soale eserfine with regard to the tasuffittimet .. .
- number of backup soboot noordiestors. i.
' Training syllabus and edledeles sust be forwarded:40 FWet'..fer
- 4 :
l ' verification. Receotion Cantera1 4 All Latters of 43reemons are in place fDr school reception . . . esoters loosted in Wes ter C ty.- Five letters et . v: agreement are still as frast a Coung fteilities- ..
- idnich best students ..Wegt,ebester and Putans ca==a* i aa. .r - + ... ,. . : 4 e
.I r-Proposed plan changea gare sukuitted te delett inocesistessies i:. . ..
,. found la the plan in 4 and Appendix 4. .Nowever; tu- . w wr ..
?- !. . these changes must be ted formally to FEMA in ths'mest e ' .- : se .
l 'pnual e submission. -
.t
, , f ... .
. g
.I .
j t c N '.Y*. -
+.*.,ff i
. 3 i
- r. .* ,
, . i
- 7. g.3 m., usa.
~t,* :e *d Tramanertation Remeuroent vi - , ,
' The issue concerning Letters of agreement with Transportetten , . . I ..
Companies is still pending. Agreements have W se'Jaitteer . . . c :') . .. < however, they are unsigned by all perS&G SWi casates . theme < - - 'I ocetracts. ,
? @c ef hgp available seat be included in the Letters of
- r
- r. in-y - .,
at to verify them is d mfficient number to transport ' 4 ,1
.
- W ..a
,1 ansit@ pendent populatagr.
___ _ em. 1, , Pretanhive latiqnat Proposed plan changes to clar4,fy the Alert EC1. as the .etGF- *- - Eg in which the "Go Rome policy" will be implemented rmet be n-formally submitted to FEMA in the 'next. annual submission 43 fi i
. avoid inconsistenor.
A deficiency found dur$ag. the JOne 4, -1986 fu11.sogle: eas'.asias' . - 4 e inolgded $ bat the MainW4mters at same schools more set- - aware of radiqlagical emergency respons procedures. Training - -
.s in these procedures should M previded to school officials.
Ranantina $ahtara; , , All Letters of agreement with School Reception Centers are sie -i t
. place.'
' Qurrest plan procedures p ad6 geste.
. 1
. Trananertation Resoumes j
' Letters of Agreement are in, place with transportatient . j
. providere. l
- Current plan procedures era adegente. .
.- ' Training syllabus and schedules sust es femarded to FlpfA for'
- 3 i
, ver$fiention. 1 l
. I. h %* -
protective Aattena-i. l i ' Proposed plan abanges to heeledW.the 8601bes" option st tee .1 s. .. . : e l Alert EQ. and the optismi 1so evag 364 dents te a sobonia <. . .. i e t .
* *, . . . . ,y 9
. . l
,'...- l . _ _ _- _. -. __ _ -
** 4%.V .- __
t
. I 4
.q reception conter at either the Alert er Site Area hergeoey C '
- E ECLa must be formally submitted to FBE in thetanut anneal tie *
'v '
planirevision suhaission'. *
' ireas requiring corrective action identified dwing the i*: s, June 4, 1986 full-soale exercise must be resolved. These -
cp 7 include the availability.and. awareness of emergemey - . i + planning inforsation for schools and the alloontice of bus i .. .
.'. t i resources to schools.
- Jtecention . Centera r-
- e
' The issue concerning Letters of Agr'5 ament for School '
Reception Centers is still pending, These Reception ' ' contirs are located in DutoMost gounty and; therefore. ' are being obtained by the OBf of Dutchtes County. -
' Plan changes must be made to delete $onsistenoies found '
in the current plan between the M. Procedure and - ' Transportation Precedure. These regisions should be - submitted to FEMA in the next formal submission. I-Trananortatioq Comoanian: '
' Letters of Agreement are in p3 ape wi% Trasaportation. ~
Providers.
.
- Proposed abanges of the plan su9t to enheitted during the - '-
, forma.1 submission to clarify MW of bus requiremente. . ' - i !- 7
- in Inf._ n tion for all h *"* P-- -M--- 4 I
T
- ' Bach county . plan'should be coordianted and amended for . - -
sensistency with each other. FEMt 9Q 1 await these plan revisions in the next formal @ == Tour. -
.' 4 l
- Interia_Findinc - I l
l h-Saeed on F5MA aootain.d .w 's c remaonab M a y sgige ep.,Se v . . ure
=unesopr
$sblic besitt and safety e-i T:
'e 1-of therg s'- t
, scho41 chi &dW m in" . Y EPE et !adian Point aan be .
t s neoted.. - rmf 1 ,
.a z.
- e i
il *
.i}}