ML20203A005
| ML20203A005 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 04/23/1986 |
| From: | Bajada E, Young J EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202J051 | List:
|
| References | |
| QI-005, QI-5, NUDOCS 8607170158 | |
| Download: ML20203A005 (7) | |
Text
.
4 Pega 1 of 5 O
CONTROLLED COPY EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORARQ) TROL NOSF-COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM QUALITY INSTRUCTION FOR ISSUE SPECIFIC ACTION PLAN I.d.1 INSTRUCTION NO: QI-005 REVISION: 3 ISSUE DATE: 04/23/86 0
Prepared by:
Date:
4-/22//[a
/
l Approved by:
%24 Date:
22 d
l
[
/
Is%ue Coo nator 1/!d 3/8/
Approved by-
. [.
Ghd4 Date:
On-Site QA Represen tive O
9AmC ev1e T.- e.ad.r 8607170159 959,3, DR ADOCK 05000445 s
QI-005 4
Revision 3
(
1.0 PURPOSE This instruction defines the reinspection, documentation, and reporting activities required of the ERC Inspection Group to support completion of the actions defined in Action Plan I.D.I.
2.0 APPLICABILITY This instruction applies to all inspectors in I.d.1, whose qualifications were not satisfactorily substantiated by Phases I &
II.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 CPRT Action Plan I.D.1 Phase III, Revision 2 4.0 GENERAL 4.1 Responsibilities 4.1.1 The ERC Inspection Group is responsible for:
1.
Assuring that all reinspections, identified O
in Phase III, are properly performed and documented.
2.
Assuring that tabulation of reinspection result comparisons are accurate.
3.
Reporting final results, for each identified inspector, to the appropriate Review Team Leaders.
4.1.2 All inspectors will be certified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6-1978 and Reg. Guide 1.58, 4.2 Policy TUGC0 and/or Brown & Root, as applicable, will provide the ERC inspection group with the information defined in paragraph.
4.1.3.2 of the Action Plan. As a minimum ERC will validate the accuracy of those inspections designated "not recreatable" or-
"not accessible", by reviewing approximately 10% of the respective records / installation.
O 2
QI-005 j
Revicion 3 4.0 GENERAL (Cont'd) 4.3 Definitions Since ISAP I.d.1 is intended to evaluate Inspector Performance to historical criteria, th~e term Inaccessible has been broadened to include "without invalidating previous tests / inspections". The meaning defined in the "CPRT App B" was intended to be used in selecting Hardware reinspection samples to be reinspected to current criteria regardless of previous inspection or test.
4.3.1 Reinspection
~~
Reinspection, by a qualified TUGC0 or Brown & Root inspector being overviewed 100% by a qualified ERC inspector, using the same revisions of the inspection procedures and criteria as the original inspection.
4.3.2 Inspection Attribute - Each individual activity within an inspection process which requires an accept / reject decision, i.e. weld length, weld profile, lug crimp location, anchor embedment length, etc.
4.3.3 Not recreatable Inspection - An inspection attribute (s) which cannot be reproduced, (i.e., weld fit-up, cable O
pull tension, etc.) or which has been altered from the originally inspected condition, (i.e., subsequently reworked, replaced, or further construction activity affected, such as a separation).
4.3.4 Objective Attribute - An inspection attribute that is not subject to interpretation and does not require any judgement.
(i.e., conductor landed on correct terminal point).
4.3.5 Subjective Attribute - An inspection attribute that is subject to interpretation and the specific item being inspected may be viewed slightly different by various inspectors.
(i.e., conduit marking visible from floor)*.
4.3.6 Inaccessible - A single attribute, or group of attributes which cannot be properly inspected without extensive dismantling or invalidating previous inspection / test results.
O 3
QI-005 l
Ravision 3 O'
5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 The appropriate ERC Inspection Discipline Level III is responsible for assuring that the appropriate Inspection Procedures and respective IR's are reviewed and the necessary reinspection matrixes developed to effect satisfactory reinspection and results comparison. The reinspection matrixes shall be reviewed and approved by the Level III prior to use.
5.1.1 The reinspection matrix, Attachment 6.1, will compile the following information:
A.
Identification of all inspection attributes either expressed or implied within the Inspection Procedures.
1 B.
Correlation of inspection attributes to procedure instructions and or accept / reject criteria.
C.
Objective / subjective designation of each j
inspection attribute.
D.
Recreatable (A) not recreatable (B) designation of each inspection attribute.
O
E.
Inspection results, of both the original inspection and the reinspection.
F.
Identification of all inspection criteria used during the ERC overview.
5.2 The ERC Inspection Group will assure that all required reinspections are performed and documented in accordance with the reinspection matrix instructions.
5.3 The ERC Discipline Level III will tabulate the reinspection results for each inspector and provide those results to the QA/QC RTL J., Hansel. As a minimum, the results reports will identify:
A. Total number of attributes reinspected.
B. Total number of disagreements per objective attributes.
C. Total number of disagreements per subjective attributes.
D. Results of review per 4.2 above.
5.4 Final reports will be provided to the I.d.1 Issue Coordinator.
O l
l 4
l
i QI-005 Revision 3 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 ERC Reinspection Matrix i
O l
l l
O O ^
Attachmant 6.1 QI-005 Revision 3 Page 1 of 2 O
ERC REINSP CTION MATRIX Action item /s 1
i Page of Reinspected item h
Orig. inspector h Inspection Criteria: Proc /Rev h
DWG/Rev h DCA's Inspection dates: Original b
h Inspection:
ERC POST IN-PhCESS
(
INSPECTION ATTRIBUTES Ql) Qy G Q2)
ORIGINAL 63)
ERC (14) n QQ)
& REFERENCES A
B OBJ SUBJ S
N0/NA LF S
C.D.
U
~
C. D. indicates that the characteristic is either not accessible or not observable for other reasons. All C. D. entries will be explicitly explained in remarks attached to the Matrix.
TUGC0 Inspector, ERC Level III Approval ER Inspector Date 15 Date QI-005.1, Revision 1
..1
~
QI-005 Revision 3
)
ATTACHMENT v
j COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS l
1.
Enter applicable A. I. number.
j 2.
Enter Type of Inspection, Item identification, and appropriate additional information desired for case of tracking or tabulation.
3.
Consecutively number each page of the matrix and attached remarks or other information.
4.
Enter name of original TUGC0 or B&R inspector.
5.
Self explanatory.
6.
Self explanatory.
(
7.
Self explanatory.
8.
Self explanatory.
9.
Enter type of OP.IGINAL inspection.
p 10.
Complete in accordance with paragraph 5.1.1 A & B.
V 11.
Complete in accordance with paragraph 5.1.1 D.
12.
Complete in accordance with paragraph 5.1.1 C.
13.
Enter the original inspection results by checking the SAT /UNSAT block where appropriate. In the case of N/A or NO the ERC entry in that column will be the same, not a checkmark.
14.
Enter a checkmark in the SAT /UNSAT column as appropriate. In the C. D. column, enter a checkmark if reinspection cannot determine sat /unsat, or enter N/A if the item did not apply.
NOTE:
When the attribute is designated as 'B' (not recreatable) the TUGCO, B&R and ERC portions of block 13 & 14 for that attribute will be xxx'd out to prevent comparative entries.
TUGCO/B&R are responsible for documenting all non-conforming conditions noted during these reinspections.
15.
Sign & Date this block when the overview and matrix are complete.
O 2
. -... -., _,,., - - -, _ _, _ _, _. _ _.., _ _ _ _..,. _ _,.