ML20126D852
| ML20126D852 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Waterford |
| Issue date: | 04/20/1978 |
| From: | PEABODY TESTING/X-RAY ENGINEERING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20125A430 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-426, FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 4.7, NUDOCS 8506150225 | |
| Download: ML20126D852 (11) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- m e om, = = ae * =mmm o - e .-m -oe m 3-a. C Pea 38cy-esing {%% Te 75 ks&n 4 *20-78 'Adttiorized fbe use ate ' Effective Date: 2 0 1978 TITLE QUALITY ASSURMCE PLAN OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 4.7 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES ' WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATICN UNIT NO. 3 {, ) l Rev. No. Descrip ton By Date 0 Issued for Use SEK 11/12/76 A rey.fle.( 11 big 4.7-1 and P W gr;ptl,,5 ) Sif 6/07/77 8 Revised Table 4.71 SEX 9/26/77 C % vised Paragrach 4.0 and Taoie 4.7-1 - 5EK 3/20/71 -fo,A@/ V264Vf !BP2?8?P "56* ~ gj tv77 CANDE04-A-55 PDR
.-~... -.-.._.__-..-~s O 's PeabodyTestrg s. OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 1.0 SCOPE All quality records utilized for inspections, testing, examina-tions, and auditing shall be included in this procedure. 2.0 PURPOSE To define the use, maintenance,' and retention of records es-sential to verify and provide objective evidence of quality. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY The Quality Control Monitor is responsible for imple-menting this procedure.
4.0 REFERENCES
a) Quality Assurance Program, Section 17,. b) EBASCO ASP IV-26 5.0 GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS 5.1 Copies of documents pertinent to NCE examinations perfomed by Peabody Testing /X-Ray Engineering Co. shall be submitted to the client for storage and retentien for the period required by the Project. 5.2 At the ccmpletion of our phase of the Project, records and copies of records retained by Peabody Testing /X-Ray Engineering Co. will be shipped to the Home Office. 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 Occurents will be generated in accordance with the applicable procedure. 6.2 Documents will be distributed to and retained by the parties indicated in Table 4.7-1. C NO. fitti A g y, pagg 4.7 QUALITY CCNTROL RECCRDS C 1 of 2
,e Testog OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES TABLE 4.7-1 DOCUMENT DISTRIBlRION AND RETENTION (NO. OF COPIES) 1 PEA 800Y OTHER TESTING CLIENT Q.C. MGR. Q.A. MGR. (SPECIFY) Q. A. Program 2 4 1 1 Q. A. Plan 2-1* 1 1 N.D.E. Reports (other than RT reports) 2 1 Contractor 1 Contractor 1 Radiography Reports 1 1 2 Radiographic Film Personnel Certifi-cations 1 1 1 Vendor 1 Purchase Orders 1 Material Certifica-tions 1 1 1 Receipt Inspection Reports 1 1 1 Nonconfonnance and Corrective Action Reports 1 1 L 1 Certificates of Calibration i 1 1 Audits 1* 1 1 1
- Two (2) uncontrolled copies to client.
G.3 Documents will be transmitted in accordanca with Procedure 2.4. s NO. TITL8 M t v. PAQ8 4,7 QUALITY C0flTROL RECORDS C 2 of 2
.. s. ,4 ,3 .. e Q N **; " " C 3eaKy-~ sim e Y,/Ob dWn D. ' Authorized fo/ use Date Effective Date TITLE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 4.5 NONCO.NFORMMCES AND COR,RECTIVE ACTICH WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNIT NO. 3 C [ J Rev. No. Description By Date A Revised Paragraph 6.6, Coleted Parsgrach 6.7 SEK 4/07/77 0 General Ravision SEX 6/13/77 C Gener31 Revis f on SEK 8/08/77 Deleted Paragracn 6.2.1 a), Ranutrtered b and c as a and D. 0 Respec,tiv,e1 SEK 8/22/,77 ( E Revised Paragraon 5.2, Addad Paragrapn 5.4 SEX 4/20/78 F General Revision dan to Ebasco Audit No RL.78121 pnr 1/gaj73
9 S. ). _....n.-.--... ......, ~... -. , \\ .s. r \\ .= g g- . RECORD OF REVISI0ttS e t 4 ar,, .a . 3 sm e .fr I m ='.. rs srra.' m% e v;.,as e.w.ai r w v e .o. a e e e .ao e.e s
- e. e e m e e.
- an o
3 J 4 e bi T. ' MM.4Be %
- W"
. e / ' ' s h '* t s . ' ' T !ssued for Use SEK 11/12/76 s Ray, No. Description Bf Date
.F_ ] _, 5 fess 21g (~: OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 1.0 SCOPE This procedure is established to control nonconformances and deficiencies as detected and to provide for immediate and effective corrective action to prevent nonconformance recurrence. 2.0 PURPOSE To provide the controls necessary to identify and correct nonconformities in the service activities of the project operation. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY The Quality Control Monitor shall be responsible for ootaining a recommended disposition of nonconformances from the Pro-ject Manager and verifying corrective action. 4.0 REFERENCE Quality Assurance Program, Sections 15 and 16. EBASCO ASP-III-7. 5.0 GENERAL INFORMATION MD INSTRUCTIONS 5.1 In order to assure the highest quality level of performance, it is nec-(,' essary to incorporate an effective system for the early detection of nonconformities and which includes the method for corrective action. 5.2 Nonconformance is defined as a condition in characteristic, documen-tation, or procedure which renders the quality of an item unacceptable or indeterminate. Examples of nonconformance include: pnysical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documentation, or deviation from prescribed processing, inspection or test procedures. 5.3 Deficiency is defined as a deviation from specified requirements (in-cluding procedures) that can be readily corrected in accordance wi:h standard soproved operating procedures or specifications based on gcod engineering practice. Deficiencies do not require an engineering evaluation or disposition for correction. They are deviations from good engineering practice and procedures. No. fifts
- asy, paqq 4.5 NCNCONFORM4CES MD CCRRECTIVE ACT!0N F
1 of 7
j ,.n: n~'.. .. = =...: :. :.. ..: :. :.m. : m -- .~ W l -{ OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 6.0 PROGDUE 6.1 Nonconfomances 4.1.1 Detection and identification of nonconfomances shall be accomplished j by: a) Surveillance b) Review of test / inspection data reports 1 6.1.2 Nonconfomances shall be documented and reported in accor d1nce with ASP-!!!-7 on Fom 6009-11. These foms shall be assigned a sequen-tial number and entered on a log maintained at the project (see Fom 4.5-1). 6.1.3 The mcommended corrective action shall be included on Fom 6009-11. The requimd niaber of copies of Fom 6009-11 shall be submitted to ESASCO for review and approval within twenty (20) working days of ,) identification of the nonconfomance. A copy shall also be sent to the Peabody Testing Quality Control Manager at this time. 4.1.4 The corrective action shall be completed within twenty (20) working days after ESA5CO approval. Corrective action shall be documented in accordance with ERASCO ASP-111-7. 6.2 Deficiencies 6.2.1 Detection and identification of deficiencies shall be accomplished by: a) Surveillance b) Review of test / inspection reports 4.2.2 Deficiencies shall be documented and reported on Fom 4.5-2. These fone shall be assigned a sequential nuseer preceded by the Peabody Testing /X-Ray Engineering Job No. (i.e., 1903-1, 1903-2, 190 3-3, etc.) and entered on a log maintained at the Project (see Fom 4.5-3).
- No.
flfl a AG V. P4e8 4.5 NONCONF0MNCES AND CORRICTIVE ACTION F 2 of 7
e 4 ...e .p.s e.'.r s, ,.....-s.s. e, s. ey r, en *. .4..pgg -. e p
- s 1.
.^. ^.. =.y...r a *. e.,
- e....
o-e,g ., t., .. '.,,8 -. = m a.. .. e... -ap __ __ .w....- t. 'Jn s s w. 3 .t.
- * *a - -
e ..* 4 e. d './. ",..d k *...'s.'J.en. 'f ...... * + -. ....._..-.. LOC MONCONFORM.ANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT C. ) ACTION REPORT NO. DATE WRITTEN BY COMPLETED REMARKS e9 ee li a. e e 8 O O M l e S s e b 8 I e Q- .e .e 6 4 9 l l e l y-.. e .e J* A ee g ea b t l l l Fom! 4.5-1 .. e .fase 4 of A
~. ......INSTRUCIIONS FOR CCMPLETING THE - ~ NONCONFORMMCE/ DEFICIENCY REPORT a* Reference type. Revision or date of reference. + Rcforence title. W \\ Type of deficiency. Wh:3 deficiency 1$..*~ ****~."i "~ A - * - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' * " ^ cbrerved.- Name of individual observing Specific description of 2 deficiency. defi;tency. List test l -, - Name of Individual verifying rcports, logs or name s f NCR. Most be a certified eta.which describe Level II, Q. C. Monito r, deft;tency. .\\ Q. C. M,anage r, List suspected cause of L / or Project Manag e r. Evaluation to be com-((f d:flatency. Action to prevent future . leted by Q. C. Monitor, occurronee. .m w x ,C. Manager, and x Pr jccc Manager. N ~ / 's Client review and
- PProval only required on Actic,n to be taken to j
s ccrreet deficiency. j, u... en a i.,1 project locations and Individuais responsib1e ....+.v..i.~. (If not required, place for corrective action & I "N/A" in blank spaces.) preventive action & \\ pr:Jected date of completion. (QC Monitor) Review and approval Actual corrective by Q.C. and Project & preventive action ~~ '-~~ Manisers. accomplished. by Q. C. Monitor. G'.. Page 5 of 7 O L
e g c _;.,,,-., _,,;., NONCONFORMANCEIDUICIENCY REPORT Pomu 4,5-2 NO. ,\\ CEPERENCE: C Somei'ication C Code C Standard C Procedure ' C Other f No. or
Title:
Rev.or Date: 4 OSSERVED DURiNG: C Audit C Surwdience C Work Process C Other C NDE C CMT DESCRIPTION: s l >= K4 085ERVED 8Y: EMPLOYEE No. DATE g '/ERIFIED BY EMPLOYEE NO. DATE 'sw. y-CAUSE: RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION: RECOMMENDED PREVENTIVE ACTION: 2OP< 3 .J D .s l N> tt RESPONSIBILITY: ( KESPON$151UTY: E l TARGET CATE: TARGET DATE: 1 l PTS REVIEW AND APPROVAL CLIENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL l %Mgr. Onee QA Dept. Date QC Mgr. ' Oste Prei. Ene. Date CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN: PREVENTIVE ACTION TAKEN: I g s I [ CORRECIIVE AC'IION VERIFIED BY: E< QC Monitor: Date: AEVIEW AND u'RovAL CLIENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL s E"oj.ME?. Dete CA Dept. Date QC % r. Osse DISTRieUTION: C QA Menegar C cc seinegar C Mo,eet Mmeger C CA Egneer C Cient QA Dana A n# 7
+ OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 6.2.3 Form 4.5-2 shall be completed in accordance with the instructions on Page 5 of this procedure. 6.2.4 To avoid unnecessary delays, approval of the QC Manager for "Recom-mended Corrective Action" may be obtained verbally by telephone. Whenever "telecon" approval is obtained, the Project Manager shall sign for the QC Manager, but annotate the approval with the state-ment "telecon approval on (date) 6.2.5 Reccmended and actual preventive action to prevent recurrence of the deficiency shall be specified on Form 4.5-2. 6.2.6 The QC Monitor shall be responsible for specifying recomended corrective and preventive actions. 6.2.7 Ceficiency disposition (For n 4.5-2, Part 3) shall be completed and documented within twenty (20) working days after approval of "Recomended Corrective Action" by the QC Manager. a) Upon completion of corrective and preventive actiens, veri-fication by QC Monitor and final review /aoproval by the Project Manager, the original Form 4.5-2 shall be submitted to the QC Manager for final review / approval (with interim file copy retained on site). b) After final review and approval by the QC Manager, the original will be retained in the QC (Foster City) office and a copy sent to the Project Manager for retention. The interim file copy may then be destroyed. .i Poo. TITLE REV. PAGE 4.5 NONCONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION F 3 of 7 i}}