ML20125A426

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
FSAR Has Been Reviewed & Chapters 14(Initial Plant Test Progs)& 17(Quarterly Assurances Prog) Are Acceptable for Docketing.Questions for Applicant Re Chapters 13(conduct of Opers)& 14 Are Encl
ML20125A426
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Waterford
Issue date: 10/19/1978
From: Haass W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Baer R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20125A430 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-426, FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 NUDOCS 7810300213
Download: ML20125A426 (3)


Text

f.:].@$595gMW-Ms!W@p=%Wn"23%iik5@Mi$1'M55Whh ew

~

m M.

t

(.

c..

.2,-.

m m

&r w

g g g fi. m+: ::-

q~

,.u.....,....n..

.u.

4g$?

Msq.......a.,

9 a

\\

p Res,s, a s

u..,

N i.!G i l rey, ~1.5 c

rq Fall ens pach, 0.' S b

/

RMcDermott, ~15 g[ '

2.. '..

FOR:

2.. L. St.er, Chief, Light :.'ater T.sS: Ors Er: inch I'o. 2, idvisica of Projc-ct !!ar.cgsnsat i i i

i 1 !

07..':

l'aiter P. Haass, Chiefs Quality Assurance Bran:h, 1

Division of Project Manacenant j

n G

S :.RCT:

/CCEPTANCE REVIEit: L.TEPJORD STEA'i ELECTRIC STATIO!!,

y Q.'.'d.ITY ASSU?.A' ICE, CD:;0UCT GF OPERATIONS, A:;D IliITIAL l F PUciT TEST ??.0GRA!!S l

J... ? ' m t:.:.'.<...cui:M::a ? esr and Light Company

,.r.

,,u

...r-e...;

ni Res;.:::sible Bre.ch:

U!?. !2 Fr: ject :icassr:

R. Een' dict

',l e

.%: es ted. ' :apletion Dcte:

October 19,1973 Pc,ic:: Sta'us:

A:cc; tan:a Review Cc Plete The C ality Assurince Ercnch has ravietted the FSAR secticns describing sa t::e dor.ket of Opsrations (Sections 13.1 arid 13.4), Initial Plant Test g

P.r,ra: s (Chapter 14), and the Quality Assuran:e Progrc:: (Chaptar 17).

C: 3; ties 14

..i l-

.f the FSAR are acceptable for docheting; h:r, aver, ac :thns rhico s :rft:ed for Chaptar 14 during cur review cra cnclosed g

for trans. ittal t ths applicant.

(km 5:-cticr.s 13.1 and 13.4 of the FST.R laci: adaquate information and ccnmit-

,ents up:.n tihich 'o da a detailed revica ar.d are r.:t acceptable. Enclosed is a description cf the findings in our acceptance review: of these sections.

. ]:

T: a lack of sufficient infor:.ation in Sections 13.l and l'3.4 suggests an

~

tction to reje:t this application.

If this application is a:cspted basad up:r. an cya:ili jeg.2nt, then this area requires early and positive action.

3 q

by T:e applictr.t ta c' tain the prer.

inforntion to initiate our riview:

,i; g

.c

)

0/A BV"Y2l* Nl.

oY) 7' '

Odshisir.ed by 8 l4 O

/

.'.'.'alte: P. Hat ss 40 D

l: alter P. Haass, Chiaf q u\\ ;

D p

d U

Q:ality,";surtn:e Grin:h 4

Division of Frojsct.4:nats!=nt e

..-. m es:

~ ~3 ;; hts for Inf0-j a.tien, Sectwns D.1 l

g._

m.

....t.,,.__.,g.......-

'- N 5

_hhb v.n.2..:.y..gn c:p.. a..r. t t---,,!

-~

~~-

f.

,/

a.

p,. 4 W1 c(.1....

.).

n.t

... - 1... e &D c

s. ~ ass

.. y...

. x....

w,,

,,i

- - -.