ML20126D534

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft Issue E to ASP-III-11, Procedure for Insp
ML20126D534
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Waterford
Issue date: 06/28/1977
From: Getzlaff T
EBASCO SERVICES, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20125A430 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-426, FOIA-84-449, FOIA-84-A-55, FOIA-84-A-65 ASP-III-11-DRFT, NUDOCS 8506150129
Download: ML20126D534 (14)
v • d • e


Text

.

.y...h.j h. m b, EI.CCTRIC STATION - UNIT N0' 3' -Q,'.;;,,h.,.

i h

bfC b "i 9;

_eg^

. c 1s -

..w;p..y.yy d4 b

'~

p m

P U

PROCEDURE NIDGER:

b ASP-III-11 3 i..,j, '

.;;., i f y..D.gf.;4...

W*,

1 J.r._ :

j

~

w.s g -

x <r

_ m... y '. 'W r, -.

~.y' A N > i.,.

.v-J,

+r

s..m;..m.

.,e.. >

.,.r.

.u l

~

~

.s

.J.s

.....a ISSUE /DATE PREPARED APPROVED REARKS m

"A" DRAFT L Co

' ^

~

Original Issua 8/29/75

~.-

Cg

.f C- (M p

"A" 9/12/75 L

J. O. Booth

- u f

~

5 "B" DIAFT y

11-6-75 J

l H

"B" 11-18-75 J

. f=

I.

d lh.

f j

g N

"C" DRAFT j

.h e Quality 3/15/76 W..C. Cri ip ing mode.'

f0.hNA l

.'/

g C 5/1/76 W. C. Grigg,

. Ice I

D DRAFT ns 10-11-76 W. C, Grigg Revis concerning handling o epancy Notices E

and revised Fo No.

i LSP-III-11-1 accordingly.- Added l

S paragraphs 4.7 and 6.6.2.3 Mk regarding Designated Inspections

[* 42, m m_)-

r M

'ff s%

"D" 10-18-76 W.C. Griggs E. Ice-E DRAFI

,T M8#

Revised paragraphs 6.4.1, 6-28-77 T. Getzlaff 6.5.2.5, 6.5.2.6, 6.5.2.7, and

.)

6.5.2.8.

Mded paragraphs 6.4.0 g 's2di. "d d ' = " -

4

, 55 pg N

FORM NO. E-1 (12-12-74) v.

p..

t t

.- mbt ~empeazzamewwwwwsmmc,y E. 'sm!x g

w f $g%y(a)

%.,.::, t Wp.dP d STEst EUDCTRIC STATI0tt ftMIT'lW 9

Q fy

,4.y %.g.ip.thrsgigg'.gg33'gfylge@, Mg;#Wjpy,ggwic 4 7.E p

nocouRE roR:

- InsricrI.

s PROCEURE NUMBER:

ASP-III-11

.(, a:..".m,:c.p. y% *r -k Y$m!l.:. O.g ".s&=. :'.;m ~h Y~..' -

..;.2*p. &':t el?e' V '22:: - '.; r ~

^. f- % f

.. :. 3

. ': W.y

.: ~~ v:.

L&v..;lg....

.-a : -Qnk.'.:. Q'y 4.w i.:4,e ;-Qj o.),i.-

5 *.

a'.C.k e zi. f._

y.r'~

i

u. :(, ~ *

...3...

......s z-4%L>-a,.?)m%.. y y

}n,~

~

',,..y a

r

.J s ;a,?g~e>%La &.q.; b. u.1 -

,,,..m. t.

7,

.;.,e,,,,.- :,

p.w s

.<s-i 9g:4 :,s,t-:.a...,, w :, ~..-ry-n y,...y - -

. - t... m.,,.,..

s, x.: ;:

g gt 4.,.,

.cp.,.3.., v.

q.,.. : ; cts.:..

g

,_.,.......~.,.m

~.,,... _ _

ISSUE /DATE PREFARS AFMOVED REARKS

,l

:ss

. g, " Q: *.

I 8-15-77 T. Gecalaff D.

se g

1 e.

  • [,**

4.q' s

'by* { *% ;*.? '-n

.t.

. =.. ~

ees ': w

.r

<n

  • - ~ ' *

'c -L.' ?%I,th3's;l. $.r,

- a

+

<,h

' 3 ; y ~;:J g, e. '

's. s

~. '.

y,,.

, Y,.* y, < r,~3..

M f.-

..t.,.

g r(-

,.','<j

,,..; s

..g. ; w 4

,a g

y e

s g

~

g.

s.

3 / * * =,., p.%";, 4

. +s,

..,g..

,s. a 3 g_

s..

e

.g,

.g e

= -

Mb s I. -

,.s.4..

~- e j

. g..

g e

E

~~

  • ~""

g.

8 n

M E

3 M

E Sw 4

t I

e e

e e

o G.

, mm 30. Asr-III-1-3 (10-13-75)

,.-..-.--.r--r

,-----.,w

,w

'-,.g...*y.-

., T.,.,

s.. (b.,,,-

5 s

45k@WarJQT4..S:ika';@fNb-iOO M by

$ ]h

~

gd M'g

.SIRVI'CES; DddRPOHATED6 n iiM7/w

+ + w. m w o m e dk.;

y r ISsuu r-c.

MATEMORD STEME!.ECTRIC.:3mIONE-UNIT E 3? MGE.4[OrhP

-N

p. j

.x 1.0 M 4

'1.1 This procedure establishes a program for the performance of inspec-tions of items and services as necessary to verify compliance with applicable doctamented instructions, procedures, specifications, cc drawings, codes and regulatory requirements. Inspection requirements

,...,.p$gand guidelines are intended to assure that. important items are., '.,.; Q p.

c s.MQf tastalled inspected and tested in a menner that will. provide s.

m e. n,, adequate confidence that they will perform satisfactorily in g

g.. -t.s

,,g..

..y,,...

?

a.y...n : ~p' g~.

.,.., ; y.;g;,.?.x.,,.,

,9,

9... y ;,x.> g..,,,.. y,r. g,m,, w..

. 7. y,.

a-

-..-....c

.. g.2. ~. s g.

.m...

,,c,,._

9 2.0 EDR

  • j.m..9,.

E -.

7-.

t

- p.,,.

M:

~

g

.,./f.2.1 The scope of' the inspection program applies to safety-related 3

.g W.

7 se

'm, ce : items and services at the Construction site.

ae 2.1 Application of scope to other than safety-related items and ser-I>

vices is applicable only if specifically stated in the scope of g

?

'the applicablar quality Control Inspectica Procedure.

' 4 :? -

L-

'g.y;;,y,:,... : g u. p., ;,.,

. 3,. ? ~

M - ",.

).,~

~

17 <-

~

3.0 REFER BCES n

.a

~.

~.,

g 3.1 Ehesco Baclear quality Assurance Program Manual for WSES, Unit 3.

m 3.1 " Corrective Action",, ASF-III-7 f

..c as-4.0 DEFINITIONS e

g 4.1 Accentance Criteria 1 A limit or limits placed on veristion per-

~

p-mitted in the characteristics of an ir m expressed in definite l

engineering terms such as dimensional colorsaces, chemical com-position limits, density and size of defects, temperature ranges, time limits, operating parameters, and other similar characteristics.

O 4.2 Anoroval - An act of endorsing or adding positive authoriaation or both.

E>

4.3 C9rtified Test Report - A written and signed de==nt, approved by

,m.

a qualified party, that contains sufficient data and information g-to verify the actual properties of items and the actual results of o

all required tests.

N 4g 4.4 Cartification - h action of decamining, verifying, and attesting, 3-in writing, to the qualifications of personnel or material.

4.5 Q343, - The tests, measurements, verifications, or controls placed on an activity by means of investigations, comparisons, or exas-inations, to detezmine satisfactory condition, accuracy, safety or performance.

4.6 Defecti.ve Material - A material or component which has one or more characteristics that do not comply with specified requirements.

4.7 Designated Inspection - Selected and scheduled inspections and testing performed by Ebasco Quality Control forces in order to monitor Contractor's performance when first-level quality control 9

activities are performed by a Contractor or Subcontractor.

I meu em r.7 (12-12-74)

.: m :,..: :j.;<.y

.g. y. s,. o.

c.:.

N RD STEAM ELECTRIC' STATION ~ - UNIT HD 3P PAGEEPDF'11A w!

g.

es 4

m

..n. s.. 47 go,,. g.3,.3.;p,7,2

.2

.s;

.,.. ; g g.,,

1- :

4.8 Discr9sancy - A deficiency discovered to be out of tolerance of the specification during routine check points shall be considered

~

.a discrepancy provided:

a) h condition is discovered prior to acceptance of work.

-. ! @ /. 1. b) h condition does not affact work, previously ac'capted. -

J,@f.;t..ygf)L ~Procedureson Codes regulating the work have not been. violat Q

y

'Q-g ; g. w ; g :.9 y ;.. v. 3s; :.. _

c,

. afgidifJe M. '. : o t:"

, 2.;:

.. x._

,...a.-

.- am... ; s. - < s,. cm %

y..,....

T4l.I.i'idtidkdF(Work. does 'not' proceed (beyond 'that check point until the correction '

f

' l./i 7 ' L' i

' 'i.G3 $$. has, been made.. -

w,w,& c s..., y

-I

- t..~c,. G..

as a

g

. %.;43

. ?@'e.f,Rocumentation ' Any writtaa or pictorial information describing

'y.

G. l.

defining, specifying, reporting, or certifying activities..

m

,- requirements, procedures, or results.

s 3

i se 5

+ 2a

====i===ia= - *= 2

= = < i

=ta==== i= =i== a5 = <==.ceia

of materials, components, supplies or services to determine con-E

/

l formance to those specified requirements which can be determined 6 by such investigation. Enemination is usually nondestructive and i

includes simple physical manipulation, gaging, and measurement.

mo 4.11 In-Process Tests

. Tests performed during the course of construction E

to maintain control of structural materials. These tests may be 5

. -q.i performed by the mannifanurer or supplier, but samples for these 4.

' tests must be taken from the lot or batch of materials supplied tar the site for use. -

-~

g

.~

4.12 Inspector - A qualified person whose. duties. include the verifica-l w

z tion of quality related activities or installations or both.

g.

g 4.11 Inanection - A phase of quality control which by means of examina-tion, observation, or' measurement determines the conformance of 5:.

materials, supplies, components, parts, appurtenances, systems, I

processes or structures to prudetenmined quality requirements.

~

m* -

4.14 133 - Any level of unit assembly, including structure, system, I

subsystem, subassembly, component, part or material.

g i

r 4.15 Bonoonformance - A deficiency is characteristic, doci==aration.

l or procedurn which renders the quality of as item or service unacceptable; Ezmeples of nonconformances include: physical defects, -

l test failures, incorrect or inadequate doctamentation, or deviation j

~

from prescribed' processing, inspection or test procedures.

4.16 Obiective Evidence - Any statement of fact, information, or record, either quantitative or qualitative, pertaining to the quality of an iten or service based on observations, measurenants or tests i

which can be verified.

i j

4.17 Procedure - A document that specifies or describes how an activity is to be performed. It may include methods to be employed, equipment or materials to be used and sequence of operations.

I FORM NO. E-2 (12-12-74)

....; v..

.g.7

.f,,,,,.e..,.,, q.y.g.3. u.s g ;,,..

s.>

s. y..-. ;

,... e

. _ _ -, 3 3' u g

. -.w.y a

~

50.dASP-EII *IA. g7, g;

.. p.., s.;%

9 REASCWSEERICES;7.NCORPontATED

,: y IRIORD'STEalt.' ELECTRIC"w.ess u p d.'O-ykar.c r_.

,".WX

.,_ 9

..~

.Q

%msm.

STATION N UNITIEr37 PAGEt-5 F052.II-%:,. fr.

M J' EY.'

7

.s,g:f3r&@.?gv&grgp:%gg.y,jg.byggft,f:yyMR.ggg. ap:7,9;g,pp.g;. d 4.18 Ouslification' (Personnen - The characteristics or abilities gained through training or experience or both that enable an individual to perform a required function.

4.19 Qualified Party - A person or organization competent or recognized as knowledgasble to perform certain functions.

3.

eQualified Procedure N:A pr'ocedure a fch incorporates all applicable T

.:.y w.y%.J4.20..p a U codes and standards, manufacturer's parameters,and 1 c l'

.i jfspecifications simi has been proven' adequate for its intended purpose. ( #

"~

.'.:j-.

. Q M &.~- M

  • w &.f- ?:39-Q M.%:5. - wn -?n m.. +..

.-.m.

,,>- n. ;-

" * " as'

. Q.;4 M Oqality Assurance 'All"those planned and systematic actions

-q

'.k

-- ancessary to provide adequate confidence that an item or a facility 4

.,...,,,. swill perform satisfactor$.ly in service.

ig g.

.. B E

.,y

.,o, w 2.

,c. __._. 9 m.

.g'.,.

.....,w

~.u e..,

m,i 4.22 Quality Control

  • Those quality assurance actions which provide a*

means to control and measure the characteristics of an item, l

process, or facility to established requirements.

5

. 4.23 Isas&i - ne procese of restorias a nonconformins characteristie

. A to a esadition such that the capability of'an item to function

-'.k Gre11 ably and safely is =i-paired, even 'though that item still may o> Cast comform to the orginal requirement.

A u

(

4.24' EssaEs. - A doc===e that gives information fbr record purposes.

.c~>-n e.

4.25 gagggk - The procesar by which a nonconforming item is made to conform h

to a prior specified requirement by completion, remachining, g

reassembling or other corrective means.

3 4.26 Safety-Related Item - Any item designated by Ebasco Engineering 1,n g

accordance with the guidelines established by the Ebasco g

Licensing Department, to be ANg Safety Class 1, 2, 3, Seismic Class I or We etrical Class.II.

E 4.27 Safety-Ralated Service - Any service performed that directly g,

affects the quality of a safety-related icas.

E 4.28 Specification - A concise statement of's set of requirements to O

be satisfied by a product, a material or process indicating, U

whomever appropriate, the procedure by means of which it may be l

de*==4=I whether the requirements given are satisfied.

4.29. Standard - Se result of a particular standardization efforr approved by a recognized authority.

4.30 12733. - A group of subsystems united by scue interaction or l

incardependance, perfomaing many duties but functioning as a l

single unit.

4.31 ' System Performance Test - A test perfonned on a comple tad systen including electric, instruentation, controls, fluid and mechanical subsye tems under normal or simulated nor:nal process conditions such as temperature, flow, lev'el, and pressure.

+

l I

ronx no. E.-2..L12-12.74) _.

,. r,,..:. a <.: *; '..,,. ~. :..p:._:-,

,.:k.

.. g.: Q. :.4

..... L - :.

n.. : - ~;-

.;
, c.a:..:....

...- t

.~

[

. SERVICEt'INCORPOREFEBt G MfEbP IbNiY I

a.rmeiw4w.vovw e%es =w

.1

-M Ef E:...

pt W18ATERFORD' STEM ELECTRIC: STATEDFi="tBf1T 'NO.3Y PACE @ wop 01%

1 a_.,

c

. s.y 7

qw:d.egree t rge,$& gMq@ fM.Wre@k.@re,U.c..:. r,xpits:g,8f.3r.

'd

'C r

4.32 Testins - 1he determination or verification of the capability of an item to meet specified requirements by subjecting the item to a set of physical, chemical, environmental.or operating conditions.

i a

n

.w, 4.33 Verification - An act of confirming, substantiating and assuring

~

than an activity or condition has been implemented in conformance

. ith the specified requirements.

w i

. 9,,,. #. *-

- p. w..i., a

.a p.s.. $$m;a.gf 3f.p: yc - L 'f; n. g.. v.w

u..,#,q.. -. o:J.,s..r,1..:.;.,,4,:-
3.,,.,.m

- E w9...

c,,

6 g j,. 3..:..~.,

c.. i..,..qc

--.. :$. 0a. - n.

ese-

t.

n

.e o,c,,m,w. n.. a.g, wnr..u..

. m g,.

-.z. m 7

2.

1..,

s.

$. e, S.L The senior quality Control Supervisor is responsible for ad=4a4=cering

.. f

.
;.,%gr.nd' directing the jobeite. quality Control Activities i d'"'Y a

c.:

. \\.,.. ;. 3x :c ; : n:.;;

.m

. q.. ;,.

~

an g

'5.1.1 Development of site Quality Control Inspection Procedures and

.. 7J... s

' Administrative Site Procedurer which relate to the functions h

e&??N: N~fcy.s :$.*f..theQuality_Cogexokttaff..'+

-/

= -

. _ _.......w.

, -cy,$,.y.

3..;p p.% <v?-

na,

~

y

't s.

v g

5.1.2 Performing inspection in areas of construction in accordance with appropriata inspection documents.

R Q. : :., :..

..,. i,....se

^+, p p..

.4

v... ).; ; p

' T 5.1.3 Preparing inspectima reports.

z.y si y:.: m..m m. h f..:<.9 s..

C- -

M.

.e-T

. Identifying and providing reinspection of nonconformance

. > 7 Q 5.I.4

~

5

..to requirements indicated by the drawings, specifications, "k

' codes or y..sessres for material, components or systems, or the stoppass of work until such nonconformance is-g,

7.....,,..~.~.,,,,,,,

d.

' -~

~

6 g

5.1.5 Mai= raining quality control records per established procedures, to provide sufficient documentary evidence that macertal and woriananship fully comply with specifica-I:

tions, drawings, and applicable documents.

k 5.1.6 Scheduling and coordinating on-the-job training for quality g.

control personnel in advance of implementation of the e,.

applicable inspection documents.

z" 5.2 Lead quality control Engineers, reporting to the Senior Quality

{

Control Supervisor, are assigned to various disciplines. Each Lead Quality Control Engineer directs Quality Control Supervisors 5

nd Quazity Comerot==.ineere/S,ecialists of his particuta= assi ned g

discipline and is responsible for the following:

l 5.2.1 Assures that all site tests, cartifications, and====4 nations l

for quality related activities are accomplished in accordance with the applicable documents.

5.2.2 Accepts or rejects work / tests in accordance with specifica-cions, procedures, and doctments.

5.2.3 Reports immediately to the Senior quality Control Supervisor or his designated representative all discrepancias and nonconformances to the drawings, specifications, procedures and applicabla documents.

I poan No. E-2 (12.12__.74_).. _.... _..._ _....

j

.y:s

,~. w t-

... : o, 4t :...;;

3.

s,.

___ m r, - #Mvous.-

y i.

>.a N.... x:w.:.n 4*....-ASF

-SERVICES INC

, %,...:y.w.,.c~u. m.s.DR20NATED NIHMERFORD STEAWELECTRIC'STATIOK' y. UNIT'ho,lPACRF $'. OF"11T ~ 'N mp#. q.

IS a

.. ~

I*, pp r, g g gg g 4 g g g gg g g y py g g y,g g g g g g g y ; g g.g,g_ g yp 7

p gy

- 5.4 " A quality Control Supervisor, reporting. co a particular Lead Quality Control Engineer, is assigned to each construction discipline or area of quality surveillance.such as Civil, Instrumentation, Mechanical, Electrical, Welding, and Material control. Quality control Supervisors are responsible for a supervisory staff which verifies a saffisfactory quality level as defined in applicable documents.

.i

'n-

.t m

a

.~

.-M

~3 c.' + -. -

.e

- +..

'PR

'.. ' jfd.5.S.I quality Control Engineers /Spacialista report to a Lead Qualitiy<

Th.b ;?'

&g 4

.972.ca.xM. Control Bagineer and are assigned to specific-quality control '

--a 2 g fumatises such as concrete testing, soils analysis and other

i.,,@',.f.pquality related activities r-*-

special expertise or

' ; A_ {

~

r.'.. W. t_

. a ns' c;pp.

4 l

-g m.q v W additional coverage.

. -.v7 > v >. a.: w. :m -*

,.n l

' f f 5.driguality Control Inspector and Tasiness (after completion of required-

. sg

- g@t.Pegiadoctrination and training per requirements) report to the Quality G~

Control Supervisor of their disciplina and are responsible for. the as R

< 22 *===

+

E

.J.6.L~ Performing inspectik 'in their areas of responsibility in

" Mff

~

p {$.: %;" gorder to verify quality in accordance with drawings,

g. procedures, speaiMeations, and applicable doctaments.,

z e..

, w o

-J.6.2 Freparing documentation of all operations requiring specific "g

reporta and/or fans completion, and submission of same to their supervisor for review and further action as required.

i

.,... e. c,;.. %..,

m,.4.,

o.

u. a. _..

e.

J

~ 5.6.3 Tamediately report to their supervisor all discrepancies and l.

noncomformances to drawings, specifications, procedures and applicable documentation..

m

~

6.0 PRDCEDURE 8

se; 6.1 Introduction E

o 6.1.1 Inspection activities at the construction site shall be performed by persons who have not performed the activity se* -

to be inspected. Inspection personnel shall not report l

directly to the immediate supervisors who are responsible g

for the work being inspected.

<e l

6.1.2.

Inspections and/or tests of items and services shall be performed for each work operation where necessary to assura quality. All inspections and tests shall be performed to verify compliance with pertinent design instructions, pro-cedures, specifications, drawings, applicable codes and regulatory requirements. When existing inspection doctaments, such as standard specifications and drawings do not provide an adequate basis for inspection, Quality Control Inspection Procedures shall be prepared by the Senior quality Control Supervisor, or his designee. Such written inspection pro-l cadures, where required, shall supplement existing design instructions, procedures, specifications and drawings in order to provide inspection program deca 11s such as hold points, check lists, sample sizes and acceptance criteria when design doctments do not already provide a full basis for the inspectica program. It is not intended that these i

.?omi 10. E-2..(12-32-nL___

....:s.

a

.-..a :,.., 4. w x c x.,..

.s-~

%,emwr$. ;

V w

p N

hkp$,hl.{t

'IRASCOJ5IRVICES - '

RPORATEB6/..

IIATRRIORB STEAlt ELECTRIC' STATION - UNIT Mtp.T.h

. 'u

. 2e w w w u w.e. m m.a L'M ISSUEtt.

&, w..

,, I,,g.g:q;~.s pm;py.p.s v.,;i.sgy:;.wi 7AM,vpp.m.+..m. o g ypy.y.u..$..h.'. k u.,.r.yq.9 f

di.jf r-F procedures be prepared in the form of rewrites or sumnaries -----

of design or regulatory doctaments.

6.1 Insoection Procedures 6.2.1 Basic requirements governing inspection and testing at Waterford III shall be included as part of design documents

.- f M '.R i. and when necessary Quality Control. Inspection ' Procedures

'. c ;.'t n :j'.JM!:'.j@,g;iMeha11 be prepared including at least the following:

v.

J m: s.

n

.. yfy g a y,g Q g. g. c g...

.;. c.,. wm.,

.v., p,,,..,..,,..w.. gt,4,1 S:

m,.5%$Ig.pd. a 3Identificacica of what is to be inspected.and who

...., a :: 9.. d g M y p ghas the' responsibility for performing the inspection.

. wp V

....w....

~..... ~

~.

1 T

'b

. Specific precautions to be observed to maintain the

, f, M.Q. f,

. ):tb~s$~;~. v.'$.. integrity of the items, involved.

g M.n

'::..? % ~,

3 en

    • 1

_ e.

Requirements of receiving, handling, storage, fabricating, I

erection and/or. installing that are to be inspected and I

the sequence in which these inspections are to be-s.

5 27 - E ***f**"*d....

..y. u z.,. -

s UJ!' #-K}F d.' ~Inspectica objectives, requiremen'es to complete the repo

~ 6 'i " P

-[.at what frequency, if any, these inspections are to be o

' '~

made and acceptance criteria.

as

,u.,

E; e.

Inspectica and test equipment required. (Note) All h

.s. 6..,.r.: 6.. testing equipment must be identified and periodically se:

' ' ' calibrated -in accordance with ASP-III-13 " Control of Measuring and Test Equipment."

wg.

f.

Specific document reference, where required.

g.

If mandatory inspection hold points are required, the 8

specific hold points shall be indicated in the inspection document exp1 mining the inspection. Work may continue es E!

beyond a hold point only with the written approval of the Senior Quality Control Supervisor.

sr

>4

=

g:

h.

Applicable sample size (in accordance with' standard o-construction practices, successful past experience and K

considering the complexity and function of the activity, r

iten or service to be inspected), for inspections performed M.

by use of a sampling program.

y 1.

Specific points where certification of equipment quality or personnel is required.

6.3 Replaced, reworked, modified or repaired ' items are to be inspected '

at least in accordance with the original requirements. Any additional requirements shall be followed when required by prevailing documents.

l

+

FORM,NO. E-2, (12-12-74)

n 4

4.*

YIbbMRP

' W A5E-III-u'i

,332152.EAy44is ATERIORD STIAN'me.v m,.v.om.w.5

=f-s.

. f fR-Q e.wue

.. m r

Mjg., n..jy, ELECTRIC STATIONY UNIT N0' E PACE:.[OF'Mri 8&i.v ? :4 -

?

6.4 Inspection Reports

~

E 6.4.1 Field inspection results shall be recorded on forms specified 4

- #in Quality Control Inspection Procedures (QCIP's) when l

provided. When prescribed checklists or forms are not provided, a General Quality Control Inspection Report, Form No. ASP-III-n-1 shan be utilized to document inspection m - t

".j..,

'
5a.,E'3[I;fh.:results.-

These reports shall include the followings.

- d.

e.

.<gp,,:: 4%

m-r

.u.

?,.-

Ap

??j.Qs. Items to which the report applies.., j gj;:.ggm..g.g L-v

~ '-

i-

.c.-6

.QJgwp;., b.; Pertinent inspection and test data; including all visualM r..W;h o en 7we bc+. w.,

g

{

4-

, ~,,.,...

.Nl2.-::e.Significantdatesandtimesofallinspections,reinspec l*

M

.U.

iJp3fticos, approvals.

~

l-t*n.

9 i ', 'd. Signature of inspector or tester.

D. W '" '

as

e. Measuring and test. equipment used where required.

g

f. Identification of nonconformances and action taken on other g

/ conditions that were not anticipated.

. 2 7,.. 5 Q

~ -

O C

.,9' '.. t.yQ)w.it*>'.radiention of inspection acceptance or rejection.

+ ', '1;

,a,

?

,g t,

u.

. h. Evaluation of acceptability, when required.

a s

3, E

. 6.4.1 -When required, Quality Control Inspection Report Forme s ah ll m

y 7

be uniquely numbered in manner simitme to that specified for numbering Discrepancy Notices. (Raference Paragraph 6.5.2.2) g g

E 6.4.2(1 Quality Control Supervisors shall each maintain a log of inspection reports as generated by their a

discipline.

6.5 Corrective Action 8

..6.5.1 Any deviation from acceptable quality discovered during any Quality Control inspection shan require corrective action by E

r the responsible party. Notices of a deviation in quality

. shall be documented by the Quality Control Supervisor of the discipline involved or his designee.

[6.5.1 A desiation in quality shan either be reported on site as a p

disc or as a nonconformance3

.e k

6.5.2.1 Discrepancies which are detected during inspectien and testing, shall be reported on a Discrepancy

~

Notice, Form No. ASP-III-11-1 (attached), by the

=*m=4ning inspector and given to the QC Supervisor 1

for his review.

6.5.2.2 The Notices shall have unique numbers designating which QC discipline reported the discrepancy.

Symbols used in these unique numbers are:

t 1

t ronN so. ASP-III-1-4 (10-13-75)

l

. : : v.

e

,;, ; s.3.,, 4

~

. #-pew h.2.k}

+

' EB48d'SEE71CI5"INd170t&TED k'4%! :

BONSSP-IZI1f1.'N N O-ISSEEr EPD

  1. T
- w n w m,- m.u ~ W 4

k'.

)Q EEEIf0ED STEst' ELECTRIC' STATION'!/ UNIT NO-3^

PACIs 33 0F%d'& W9f yQy&Q,

.n h.

US

.o y

.xw. w.p..:rg.;-y q,yyg,,,; gg,gy w ysw;m,Yx m (.- a gy 9 &;p gag, 9, 1,

,7,v-

.-a

' E - Electrical

- M - Mechanical

+ ' ~ ~ '

  • I - Instrumentation and Controls

'%~"

F - Welding HC-Material Control id'Aeanexampleofauniquediscrepancynumber.D.N.

M,4,

,.(

M.:' h(gy4 Electrical Discipline Discrepanc A.y4yg,...

J.

.e pNo..E-44 signifies: Discrepancy Notice Number -

C

@M'd,j"dpggf we,@y.b"'!

1 gf 3:

,3 ],

M

. ;M4,

,~

i

';q.2l,- 4,4W.MhfMQuality Control. Supervisors shall each keep a log of, 'j '

..f.b.. '

,.Q.. g.,:..;,.4,A P hqq b discrepancy notices generated by their department, oe

'"N,7/*g$and current status of discrepancies shall also be

,.. A.~.,r.n $.,.a.z,.t..c,.oamintained in accordance with ASP-III-7.

wi,

.w

,o %.

~s, n ;m.~ u.mm,x m,:. :.

. m,.

l

j3ljf*J.h6;5;2.37.The Q;C -Supervisor any provide a recommended disposi-

~ ', '

c.

.w

(",

. @pA 'l tion, or he any transmir the Discrepancy Notice to ne

)

~

' c. the applicable Contractor or other cognizant personnel u -o.+ - for a recommended disposition. After provision of a

~

E d Y.

r=* h ad disposition by the Q.C. Supervisor or at

. 7.R...r#a.4. o the time of transmittal, for a recommended disposition,

.., ~ *

 ; ANM' [ h 3 pj' to the Q.A. Site Supervisor.h"'h-a espy i

9. ;,, l
.?

.U.. ~r,y:

4%

q.,

g

.n

' PG.J.2.k 'If the Q.C. Supervisor considers the discrepancy to 4

'~

g' that a

" 9 y '" W. 3, 4 Q be e nonconformance, he shall r=e - d T*d" Eensonformance Esport be initiated. When a Wenconformance Esport has been or other action is

  1. 'I' ' '

3:

raa-ded, the NCE number or other direction shall _.

_~

be indicated on the Discrepancy Notice by the Q.A.

l

]

Site Supervisor, and the Discrepancy Notice is 5

upgraded to a Nonconformance Esport,.no further 8

processing of the Discrepdacy Notice is required.

m.

F 6.5.2.5 If the Q.C. Supervisor considers the discrepancy not to be a nonconformance and if he provides a recommended disposition, he shall transmit the g

,E Discrepancy Notice to the Senior Easident Engineer or his designee for his disposition.

o m.-

4 6.5.2.6 If the Q.C. Supervisor considers the discrepancy not l'

t.,' -

  • to be a nonconformance and if he does not provide a l J raa - d=d disposition, he shall transmit the Discrepancy Notice to the applicable Contractor or other cognizant personnel for. a recommended dispost-i tion. The recomended disposition shall be provided, 4

and the Discrepancy Notice signed, dated, and returned to the Ibasco Q.C. Supervisor. The Q.C. Supervisor shall transmit the Discrepancy Notice to the Senior E

Easident Engineer or his designes for his disposition.

E 6.5.2.7 After the Senior Resident Enginee,r or his designee has provided the final disposition, he shall indicate to whom the Discrepancy Notice is to be referred for corrective action.

+

$^

FORK NO. ASF-III-1-4 (10 13 75)

I e

--,w-w---,-

,n- - -. -. - - - -..

,,--mga._-_,

GrWWAW4@Ms~d As4T4dw@s on..W.ider@' Discrepancy.%.-n N.$)

Mtu.+g '

eTu.nW.9'@,;.

@ 35

~.2.8 mTha:4.'CL Supervisor shalt transmiCtha

'T-4:

n

. PT@"S/45otice to'the? applicable Contractor or ocher' 44G8g w.; *

^

4 i

J C.

  • indicated personnel who is responsible for corrective -
  • action. This party is to complete the portion of the form indicating the corrective action that was taken

~ and is to returif the Discrepancy Notice to the Ebasco

~

Q.C. Supervisor.

.
. MJ

? c' 3 Qu$d7 6.5J2.9. Upon notification that corrective action has beda p completed, the Q.C. Supervisor shall schedule a

.7 Q?

~

7.k

.. S$d-YdSf$k

.r.w. h grainspection.,j p g.j; 6 gy.p,gJj, 6 ;3,[,3,b 3l,g,,

..c..

,,, m.,+. L4/,,..

.f.j k at

';"f.q:$g%6.E2'.12Uposcompletionofthe, reinspection.~theinspector4Zgshal

^

". Reject, and shall sign and date the Discrepancy i

1,",2.' notice.

.(

'*% 2:

.V_

-l

....v.

-m.49.-

,.2..>y,1. y. - w; ;. y +.. -

w

-q.

.n

., 4 u n.

..m.s

.~

se

.m &

. 6.5.2.11 Isonconformance identification, control, and dispositi'en 5

ar emet i ed i rroced re.ise-zzz.6.

o 6.6 kaspection During' Construction Site Phase

~

~

E

~.,., :..,

a y

z,;,..,. Proconstruction Vgrification.

' 6. 6.1.

f,-J ac s.

i 6.6.I.1 Esquirements for. receiving. handling,and. storage o f o

li items are describ4d in procedure ASP-III-14. In

' addition to these requirements, verification shall..

. E

' ~ ~ be made by visual====4aation of the item at the time 'of installation for proper identification,

' physical damage,' and centamination, and of the' instal-k'"'.

~

~~-

.JIstion location for conditions affecting tha item.

6.6.2-Yerification During Constructiotr-8

6. 6. 2. I' Insp.etion and eastias sulr he verform.d during

~

i

_e the instaflation of items to verify that requirements f.

  • ar.e met in, accoidanga with prescribed, procedures.

~

,... - These activi, ties shall be performed in a. systematic manner in accordance. with prevailing documents in

,- orde'r _to assure.survefilmace throughout the installation g-o' process.

,n, a.

. - g-6.612.1 Inepectica activitius shall include as' appropriate, m

-bu,t are not limited to. the.followidg:

~

al..Contro1*of specf,al processes.

j b) Nondestructive.====f a=tions, when required.

c). Inspections of the work areas and.vork in progress.

l d), Installation checks, inc.luding cleaning, flushing l

and conditioning.

l l

e) Hydr 6scatic testing.i f) Care of items.

+

t FORM NO. ASP-III-1-4 (10-1%70

P NN "b,WATERIORD' STEAlt EECIIIC STATION 1'1RfIT' NO 7hActr 9 Of.th4 %.?l

/ d l

y.. =

4N',

?QQfA f

..u. ~.

mn.. -

>... vn m :..,,x n.

c".q

>. u 9. @'s y* a.4, p g, m..n. g 6r.3.2.8 ; The; n. s.s wSenior' Resident Engineer or his designe J: ;

1 g

'W.g I

hf transmit f.he Discrepancy Notice to the applicable -

Contractor or other indicated personnel who is responsible for corrective " action. This party is to complete the portion of the form indicating the corrective action that was taken and is to return the Discrepancy Notice to the Ebasco Q.C. Supervisor.

i

.Only the completed original will be acceptable,and s.-

w.

l

. 2.G%j;.'.3f.;fC h' a..,d. f this will be completed in black fine point pas on y.

'.'- d,

Qp.v 4 k M p..

y; ;

C W.,yp.ge;c...e... j,.n y, e (...

,,. g. y.;3 q;pq/.5;21 Upos notification that corrective action has been

,. t

&W;c:

t6

..g.( E -

.f'.Q"-@.@yg.Q, completed,'the Q.C. Supervisor shall schedule a,

?. '.;'.pc W [ 6.v.gy cy g. m..reinspeccloa..

a :..

. c... e....s.4.,

.r.

;.u. e

.. g,

.....a.a z

..,w.,,.

..n..,

..~..i

..4.5.2.10 Upon completica of the reinspection, the inspector R

).

1

./, 6:. 7

-w-r, l;r;;'."@@M,7Fi shall indicate the status by checking, Accept or 4 g

-7",

Reject, and shall sign and date the Discrepancy

"' ~'

5-1 5

6.5.2.11 Nonconformance identification, control, and l

{

N.V,;,,.

disposition are explained in Procedure ASP-III-6.

6.6, Inspection' During Construction Site Phase 1

..E r.

i 5

-- ; a 6.6.1. Preconstruction.Yorification

(

5 6.6.1.1 maquiremanes for receiving, handling, and storage of l

items are described in procedure ASP-III-14. In g

l

' ; ffd'd,<,s..I d e,- addittom to these requirements, verification shall j

g

==

' ~ -

, be made by visual azamination of the item at the time I

of installation for proper identification, physical damage,and. contamination, and of the installation location for conditions affecting the item.

g 6.6.2 Verification During Construction

^

6.6.2.1 Inspectica and testing shall be performed during the 3

g installation of items to verify that requirements are met in accordance with prescribed procedures.

These activities shall be performed in a systematic menner in accordance with prevailing documents in order to assure surveillance throughout the k

installation process.

I k

6.6.2.2 Inspection activities shall include as appropriate, but are not limited to the following:

a) Control of special processes.

i i.

l b) Nondestructive====4amtions, when required.

c)

Inspections of the work areas and work in progress.

d)

Installation checks, including c1==ning, flushing I

and conditioning.

j e) Bydrostatic testing.

f f) Care of items.

1 b

f j

. IO.RM NO. ASP-III-1-4 (10-13-75) z :.:.:.....

t 4

-__._-..-.c__-_.,

l

'9

~

$ kWW -

- h?'?M

. M i#. W @t completed sys% M 3. %

~

%%%Yt h

idation.tha tems aret

. g per I,., 1 %32%

.,4 79

" ormances uith: Ypecifiefreguirement sF' j.; %W,v4,pw1q$26pgagy%,

L.

y' 4

j. ?,t'y

.3

E ' 'Thef.4 gy 'h) 'Preoperational Testing i

~'

I

1)
  • Functional Teses

/*

'.c.

.)

a

.s 6.6.2.3 when first-level quality control activities are performed by a Contractor, Designated Inspectiods

. 51, %;.. / M e,,: rig.s.

w J'

shall be performed by Ebasco Quality Control forces

).$$

ri..g.ya.accordancewithstatisticaland/orchronofosical

$dE.NW$RCg[h@ChrWeelectica of items and events as defined in Quality}

' 4 >!.v.;

j:

M Y aii

/

1 ;f,/.4-cs.$9,a.:$.

Contrg1* Inspection Procedures. Designated Inspections

  • ].,

i 7f:,'pj' :g[N]:;;yN'[W;"*[%shall. be recorded by data reports and/or checklista

.7. 4.2,;.g '

=N

..J N.,M,O.andtheserecords'shallbeproces.sedinaccordance l

. ~ E,

./

.c>

-witir Procedure ASP-I-6 entitled " Quality Assurance E

. ~-.c 4

I E. e g g.

f.ll?.b.T Records". Additiiinal inspections may be performed

..J.

,. 9.U.h,Tc. Won a day to day basis. when there' is indication of m(g;..f.f^wgM ym qs

...q;.,3 f

Wyroblem areas. Regular Designated Inspections y /J.

.m.-

N'

-may be increased when there is indication of need

.L g.

+

v-for greater surveillmace over Contractor's Quality

, 7.' Assurance Program performance and pertin e t Ebasco

c. - n.g : C.,ud. quality Control' Procedures shall be revised accordingly.

- ((.;

' h?.?l.bf;[. khh5Df;sc d -

,E

~ "' '676~.3 Poec Construction Vetificia. tion.

M

'-s "I

g'-

Installed items shall be inspected to verify require-

,6.6.3.1

.. meats such as the following:

,.c

'..d;M;;C ::gf&).:i* ?::..c. ; ; ;f a. Final acceptability status of in-process inspe I' '

.m g-W.

M

. activities.-

'g

, b) That nonconforming items and other discrepancias -

i y

y

~

~

have been satisfactorily resolved.

3

  • ~

, g-

, c.) That appropriate protective. measures are applied for layup after installation, where necessary.

a

~

' ~-

d).That'any temporary conditions, which must remain.

E, an an interia ba' sis, are clearly identified so'

<l.

.that rescoration can be ascertained prior to placing items in service.

g-

.. e} Performancerof any required final teathg, includ-__.

fag equipment, tests and sys, tem eests.

i

~

~

I Data Analysis and Evaluation 6.7

- 6.7.1 The Senior Quality control Supervisor, or his designees, a

shall collect inspection and other test data and shall evaluate such data against acceptance criteria and performance standards.

Data evaluation should provide prospc preliminary review to datermine the validity of the inspection and test results and the appropriateness of.' continuing the inspection or test.

6.7.2 Inspection and test data shall be analyzed and evaluated to verify requirements such as the following:

9 FORM NO. ASP-III.1 4 (10-13-75) l.

rw w.s.+.-,i,--------w,--.

y w-

-,e e.~-v=---v-

~

.~. -

p

,..._.-mm r

9 y g -- -

- - -wn.t e w me.,w wa-t vr - qw nwreyf(

%Ju.irP.g",-

L =

vSTEANIEI.ECTRIC:STATI0tFsUNIT NO O.t PACEY26*fes(MN e,

b.

4,;d 3

a. W..~ W 3 f W W '+3 W.W V % )yJg l@'yy}) "d.'79g, (f

.Ms)

' NCp W' ~ $M

[-i' fc.

,f r

etaneescoL eesuLes.)

m 2

d n., k

'V;.p- '&

I'.k...I[b

' M E [ M M d. @ T M $ N C [c. D$A'yfavemaatj,of,71nsp

" ~85 i43[ @ @"

M

.yy.g J

p.g yti

' I. D

...c)Operationa.1, proficiency of items, where pertinene.

d) Identification of any necessary changes to the installation, inspection or test procedures.

6.7.3 The Senior Quality conerol Supervisor or his designess shall

. m 6,..

6 document tho'results of data analysis and evaluatiqp on the.

l u-

~ y,3;;.;&y%,~~,'}hsh. y16a gepan.

xgs%:f.4.yw:., ;i:l*g%gg,s. isl[C ?.;:.k_ _

2.

7;.;

.y ;;%.YiW?&::;.?#*?.: y..,

GQ.$L. y.

?.

3 q ;., _ _,..

?. **-

y :q;[

- 6

. m"s a

c......,~.o...-.

. n.~

.v..

.m.:..,.s.y 8 ~ Re.c.ords.. ;.:;,~s*. P.am>: m,cm?:,

.:;.y.. a. m m.sv R i s

'.*..y.

.n.< +%c m < y.

= :. %e..n..; :..

.. i.

y c

m

':.c ;:

. w, z g

- M-e 6.8.1. '~ Inspectida records shall be maintained as described ih

' R-88

..jy*QualityAssurance, Records". ASP-I-6.

3

... -... f.

v.

- g.

en 7.O ATTACENEBTS. v ~ c. m e.u e..

,a.

!~. ~,

> a.

l ' ';.m+ g.i.fi,ty~ ^.> a. Mg?4p;.,.

, 4 W-

g. g.g s ;- a p

B 7.1 Discrepency Notice, Form No. ASP-III-11-1.

_.~,

E 7.2 quality Control Inspectice Report', Form.No. ASP-III-11-2.*

, c.. G :..

3 N

.A

... Q4.,Tt L;i V.

iAA...s -q:

  • ( * *" *.y [('M.. [.. W*.$ r?

. 'M* -

2 5

A f.,

"4*-

4 '

}

e

,h.

4 3.

g

  • /.--..',..

. m..,-l

,Q.. -

+

4.

4 '

~.

p

,w g.

~

sr

.." m /r~

v...:

> ;.. w. _. =

w

~

w

~

8 W

w.

m p

..m N

l 0"*

/

../

.,o**

,a,*

s g

g 4

r er N

.g e

I I

t p

I f

g e

g D

FORM NO. ASP-III-1-4 (10-13-75) 3

...---a...

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20126D534&oldid=4276410"